Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 03:39 AM - Wavier (cpayne@joimail.com)
2. 04:45 AM - Re: Wavier (Daniel Fortin)
3. 05:38 AM - Re: more CHT (Brian Lloyd)
4. 07:19 PM - MTW aerobatic training (MFilucci@aol.com)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Yak-List message posted by: "cpayne@joimail.com" <cpayne@joimail.com>
In theory, could the FAST organization forward a request for
blanket wavier (or exemption) to the FAA for purposes of
allowing FAST qualified aviators to overfly "densely
populated" areas in formation for the purposes of aerial
tribute appropriate to the occasion ? Having a copy of such
a letter in the cockpit, would allow flyovers and missing
man flights held in conjunction with local events. Certain
guidelines would apply of course, minimum altitudes, ATC
clearances when in controlled airspace, etc.
Craig Payne
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Yak-List message posted by: "Daniel Fortin" <fougapilot@hotmail.com>
Just call it "exebition". It is after all the basis of certification for
your airplanes.
Dan Foritn
>From: "cpayne@joimail.com" <cpayne@joimail.com>
>Reply-To: yak-list@matronics.com
>To: yak-list@matronics.com
>Subject: Yak-List: Wavier
>Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 06:39:58 -0400
>
>--> Yak-List message posted by: "cpayne@joimail.com" <cpayne@joimail.com>
>
>In theory, could the FAST organization forward a request for
>blanket wavier (or exemption) to the FAA for purposes of
>allowing FAST qualified aviators to overfly "densely
>populated" areas in formation for the purposes of aerial
>tribute appropriate to the occasion ? Having a copy of such
>a letter in the cockpit, would allow flyovers and missing
>man flights held in conjunction with local events. Certain
>guidelines would apply of course, minimum altitudes, ATC
>clearances when in controlled airspace, etc.
>
>Craig Payne
>
>
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Yak-List message posted by: Brian Lloyd <brianl@lloyd.com>
jay reiter wrote:
> I am working on a CJ6.The cylinder head temperature lead to the rear
> thermocouple is damaged. There is no color code visible and neither
> lead is magnetic. In the parts manual 2-15-2 items 14 & 20 the
> terminal strip studs, the material is listed as NCr10 for one and
> BMn43-05 for the other. Is Nickel Chrome and Barium Manganese a
> known thermocouple material? Are they the chemical formula for other
> trade named thermocouple materials? I am familiar with iron /
> constantan and chromel / alumel systems in either case one of the
> leads is magnetic.
Chromel (NiCr, also known as Nichrome) is a fairly common material used in thermocouples
and is used in type 'K'. The other material is Alumel (NiAl). Nickel
is magnetic.
Type 'J' is iron/constantan (CuNi -- copper and nickel). I would expect both of
these materials to be magnetic.
'N' is nitrogen, 'B' is Boron, and 'Mn' is Manganese. I have never heard of those
being used in a thermocouple. Boron is getting pretty close on the periodic
chart to being a semiconductor and it is pretty hard to nail Nitrogen down
to anything that isn't ultimately an explosive (or at least highly reactive).
But it could be just an error in translating from the Chinese to English.
But it sounds as if you are looking for the extension leads and that is another
story. If you get the wrong leads the calibration will be off. Regardless,
the material in the leads does not have to be the same as the material in the
thermocouple. The materials in the leads are selected to provide cold-junction
compensation and thus allow you to use regular copper wires after the compensating
lead to the instrument itself.
Why don't you get a new lead from Doug and not have to worry about calibration?
And my information is worth every penny you paid for it.
--
Brian Lloyd 6501 Red Hook Plaza
brianl@lloyd.com Suite 201
http://www.lloyd.com St. Thomas, VI 00802
+1.340.998.9447 (voice) +1.360.838.9669 (fax)
There is a time to laud one's country and a time to protest.
A good citizen is prepared to do either as the need arises.
Message 4
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | MTW aerobatic training |
--> Yak-List message posted by: MFilucci@aol.com
Intrepid aviators,
I have heard a rumor that someone has lined up a Russian aerobatic
instructor for Manitowoc but have not been able to determine if it is fact or
fiction.
Does anyone have any info?
If there is no instructor in waiting, we may be able to recruit Sergei
Boriak again this year -- if there is interest in having him back. The arrangement
would be the same: all who participate in the training from this aerobatic
champion and US Aerobatic Team Coach would pay Sergei his hourly fee and pitch
in with the other participants to share his expenses. Those who have done so
in years past have said the money is well spent.
Please let me know "off list" if you are interested.
Regards,
Mike Filucci
_mfilucci@aol.com_ (mailto:mfilucci@aol.com)
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|