Yak-List Digest Archive

Wed 01/04/06


Total Messages Posted: 31



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 01:42 AM - Re: Air bottles (fish@aviation-tech.com)
     2. 05:20 AM - Air Bottle Testing (Jeff Linebaugh)
     3. 05:27 AM - Air Bottle Testing (Jeff Linebaugh)
     4. 05:35 AM - Re: Air Bottle Testing (A. Dennis Savarese)
     5. 05:56 AM - Re: Air bottles (Fraser, Gus)
     6. 06:17 AM - Overhead Breaks (MFilucci@aol.com)
     7. 06:40 AM - Re: Air bottles (doug sapp)
     8. 06:44 AM - Re: prop pitch (Scott Kirk)
     9. 07:11 AM - Re: slow air leak (doug sapp)
    10. 07:18 AM - Toolbox pictures (Buzzard Aviation)
    11. 07:26 AM - formation breaks (Mark Jefferies YAK Uk)
    12. 07:34 AM - Re: formation breaks (Jerome Van der Schaar)
    13. 08:00 AM - Re: Air bottles (Brian Lloyd)
    14. 09:25 AM - Re: Air bottles (Walter Lannon)
    15. 10:17 AM - Re: prop pitch (Walter Lannon)
    16. 12:28 PM - aerobatics (FamilyGage@aol.com)
    17. 12:45 PM - FOD CHECK~! (Tom Johnson)
    18. 12:46 PM - Annual Inspection Checklist (Tom Johnson)
    19. 01:06 PM - Re: FOD CHECK~! (Stephen Fox)
    20. 01:44 PM - Re: Annual Inspection Checklist (Roger Kemp)
    21. 02:08 PM - Re: FOD CHECK~! (Bitterlich GS11 Mark G)
    22. 02:30 PM - BOTTLE TEST (JOE HOWSE)
    23. 03:24 PM - Re: Survival Vest (Bitterlich GS11 Mark G)
    24. 04:18 PM - Survival Vest (Frank Haertlein)
    25. 06:08 PM - Survival Vest (Timothy Gagnon)
    26. 06:32 PM - Re: Survival Vest (Roger Kemp)
    27. 07:04 PM - Re: Survival Vest (Bitterlich GS11 Mark G)
    28. 07:12 PM - Re: Survival Vest (Bitterlich GS11 Mark G)
    29. 07:25 PM - Re: Annual Inspection Checklist (A. Dennis Savarese)
    30. 08:02 PM - Re: Survival Vest (Brian Lloyd)
    31. 11:13 PM - Journey complete! (Barry Hancock)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:42:13 AM PST US
    From: fish@aviation-tech.com
    Subject: Re: Air bottles
    --> Yak-List message posted by: fish@aviation-tech.com Yak List, Over the weekend I was watching the Myth Busters, and they did a show on the movie JAWS. One of the things they did was to shoot a hole in a Scuba bottle, and the results were very interesting. The bottle did not blow up, but did have to expend a serious amout of pressure(bounce all over a 40' sea container). They stated the equivilant in explosives, but I do not remember. Be carfull John Fischer Yak-52, N213YA >--> Yak-List message posted by: "Walter Lannon" <wlannon@cablerocket.com> > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Walter Lannon" <wlannon@cablerocket.com> >To: <yak-list@matronics.com> >Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 8:31 PM >Subject: Re: Yak-List: Air bottles > > >> --> Yak-List message posted by: "Walter Lannon" <wlannon@cablerocket.com> >> >> Ignoring the emergency tank and assuming the paintball tank as estimated >> Boyle's Law say's there will be 2800 psi in the CJ main tank. >> >> Walt >> >>> --> Yak-List message posted by: "Walter Lannon" <wlannon@cablerocket.com> >>> >>> Dave; >>> >>> The CJ air tanks are 12 liters (main) and 3 liters (emerg). With the main >>> air valve open both tanks are charged from the external supply (or from >>> the compressor) >>> With the main air valve closed only the small emergency tank will be >>> charged. >>> >>> Arithmetic gives me a headache but here are some numbers for you that >>> suggest you treat that 3000 psi bottle with great respect. >>> >>> 1. Don't know the actual size of your paintball tank but lets call it 6" >>> dia X 24" long. That represents an internal volume of 0.3927 cu. ft. >>> Into that is packed 72 cu ft of air or 183 tank volumes. >>> >>> 2. One paintball tank volume (0.3927 cu ft) = 11.12 liters >>> >>> 3. Without getting too involved in the arithmetic that means when you >>> transfer that 3000 psi to the CJ main you would theoretically have >>> slightly less than 3000 psi in that tank. > > If your paintball tank volume is >>> less than my estimate then you will have more than 3000 psi. > >WRONG. Got that backwards. > The smaller the external tank the lower the pressure. But to stay under the >operating pressure limit of 50 Atm (730psi) the external tank cannot exceed >3 liters in volume at a pressure of 3000 psi for transfer to a 12 liter >tank. > >Theoretically >>> of course since the CJ tank (and/or most of the aircraft) would have >>> exploded long before then. >>> >>> Please be very cautious. You are dealing with a bomb >>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > >


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:20:50 AM PST US
    From: "Jeff Linebaugh" <jefflinebaugh@earthlink.net>
    Subject: Air Bottle Testing
    Get your air bottles tested, YES! Two years ago, I found my CJ emergency bottle in very sad shape, and had to replace it. My main bottle was tested and found to be fine... At that time we postulated that the emergency tank sits "stagnant" more than the main tank. When filling the main air tank, I squirt a bit of air tool oil in the fill line to add a little rust preventative. The emergency tank doesn't benefit from this if still full as the air recharge won't get to it. Using Nitrogen instead of air would help prevent rust. (That is the reason Nitrogen should be used in struts instead of air Dave.) Nitrogen is not too desireable for the main tank in my book (and besides, it would be quickly diluted by the compressor air), but should be just fine for emergency tank use. Fill the emergency tank to a value just slightly higher than the main system operating pressure (but still below normal limits). Then assuming no leaks, your emergency system should remain isolated and full of N2, and be less prone to rust. To do this requires playing with your pressure regulator This method would not be required for Yak 52 folks as their emergency system is completely isolated (cannot be charged by the compressor). Is it common to charge Yak 52 systems with N2? I hope so... Just a thought... Jeff Jeff Linebaugh jefflinebaugh@earthlink.net http://home.earthlink.net/~jefflinebaugh/ CJ-6P N621CJ Memphis, TN


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:27:00 AM PST US
    From: "Jeff Linebaugh" <jefflinebaugh@earthlink.net>
    Subject: Air Bottle Testing
    My personal experience with Tyms for air bottle testing was not too great It took 5 weeks to get my bottles back, and one of the fitting seats was damaged (on my brand new emergency tank). It required 3 phone calls to get my bottles back. A friend had a similar experience just last month. I have since been told that most large cities should have bottle testing companies, as most forklifts are going to propane, and their bottles require regular testing. I have also been told that they should have fittings to fit our bottles... I have not comfirmed this, but was told by a forklift mechanic. Anybody else have an alternative? Tyms, in my book is not a great alternative... Jeff Jeff Linebaugh jefflinebaugh@earthlink.net http://home.earthlink.net/~jefflinebaugh/ CJ-6P N621CJ Memphis, TN


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:35:08 AM PST US
    From: "A. Dennis Savarese" <dsavarese@elmore.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: Air Bottle Testing
    It is possible to charge Yak 52's with Nitrogen particularly if both the main and emergency systems are completely empty. However, I would recommend after doing so to discharge the main air tank and recharge it with dry compressed air (breathing air) to a point just below the pressure relief valve pressure. This technique should prevent the compressed air from diluting the Nitrogen in the emergency tank. Dennis ----- Original Message ----- From: Jeff Linebaugh To: yak-list@matronics. com Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 7:17 AM Subject: Yak-List: Air Bottle Testing Get your air bottles tested, YES! Two years ago, I found my CJ emergency bottle in very sad shape, and had to replace it. My main bottle was tested and found to be fine... At that time we postulated that the emergency tank sits "stagnant" more than the main tank. When filling the main air tank, I squirt a bit of air tool oil in the fill line to add a little rust preventative. The emergency tank doesn't benefit from this if still full as the air recharge won't get to it. Using Nitrogen instead of air would help prevent rust. (That is the reason Nitrogen should be used in struts instead of air Dave.) Nitrogen is not too desireable for the main tank in my book (and besides, it would be quickly diluted by the compressor air), but should be just fine for emergency tank use. Fill the emergency tank to a value just slightly higher than the main system operating pressure (but still below normal limits). Then assuming no leaks, your emergency system should remain isolated and full of N2, and be less prone to rust. To do this requires playing with your pressure regulator. This method would not be required for Yak 52 folks as their emergency system is completely isolated (cannot be charged by the compressor). Is it common to charge Yak 52 systems with N2? I hope so... Just a thought... Jeff Jeff Linebaugh jefflinebaugh@earthlink.net http://home.earthlink.net/~jefflinebaugh/ CJ-6P N621CJ Memphis, TN


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:56:41 AM PST US
    From: "Fraser, Gus" <gus.fraser@gs.com>
    Subject: Air bottles
    --> Yak-List message posted by: "Fraser, Gus" <gus.fraser@gs.com> No problem and I will throw in a Cuban at OSH :) Gus -----Original Message----- From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of doug sapp Subject: RE: Yak-List: Air bottles --> Yak-List message posted by: "doug sapp" <rvfltd@televar.com> Jim, Many thanks for the heads up/correction, I did not check the numbers and am guilty of assuming that they were correct. You owe me a beer Gus! What exactly is Boyles law? Always Yakin, Doug Sapp -----Original Message----- From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Jim Bernier Subject: RE: Yak-List: Air bottles --> Yak-List message posted by: "Jim Bernier" <JBernier@dart.org> Dave, When solving for this pressure drop I get 385 psi final pressure. That is using Doug's 8 liter bottle and Boyles Law. I trust that he is correct. I assumed that the main tank was empty. That turns out to be 27 atm. I have started my plane on the amount. The plus side is that you will have over 9 liters of air at that pressure instead of 8, if you leave the bottle connected. When you empty the tank, then fill it from the paint gun bottle, try to start it cold. That will be the final test. But here in Dallas it isn't really cold, ever. You never know for certain until you try. Jim B >>> rvfltd@televar.com 01/03/06 1:10 PM >>> --> Yak-List message posted by: "doug sapp" <rvfltd@televar.com> Dave, Remember that 750PSI is 51 atms. While this is just 1 ATM over the operating pressure I would recommend that you use a bit of caution if your bottle has not been off and tested recently. If it has been tested recently, I doubt that you have anything to worry about. The CJ6 tech manual says that operating pressure is 50 atms (page 104) and that the 8 liter tank should fill in 22 minutes (page 107). As a group we have been extremely lucky in that we have not had any main air bottles explode yet (that I know of). I would caution you all to not become complacent and feel that because we have not had a failure that this is really not a potentially serious problem. A in-flight failure could have very serious consequences. If your bottle has not been checked, get it done, record it in the log book, it's very cheap insurance. Always Yakin, Doug Sapp -----Original Message----- From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Dave Laird Subject: Re: Yak-List: Air bottles --> Yak-List message posted by: Dave Laird <dave@davelaird.com> On Jan 3, 2006, at 11:20 AM, Fraser, Gus wrote: > --> Yak-List message posted by: "Fraser, Gus" <gus.fraser@gs.com> > > David, > Remember that your 3000PSI will 'expand' to 750 psi in the main tank. > Treat the paintball tank like a capacitor it has a load of charge so > your small tank should give you a full charge of the 6 ltr bottle in > the plane. > > Gus > cool! thanks Gus.... I think I'm going to empty the main air this week and then go ahead and fill it from the paintball tank to try it out! Dave


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:17:15 AM PST US
    From: MFilucci@aol.com
    Subject: Overhead Breaks
    In a message dated 1/3/2006 7:45:52 AM Central Standard Time, cpayne@joimail.com writes: RedStar pilots usually do a good job but seeing it go wrong in slow motion brings home the importance of timing the break, flying the same line and maintaining the interval and glideslope angle. Were there any specific aerial practice maneuvers used in military training to sharpen up the 4-ship break? Practice, practice, practice... A few things do contribute to success: briefing and flying a precise speed on downwind, making sure each aircraft is precisely in line and on altitude on downwind, starting the base turn precisely abeam the numbers (or at a prebriefed reference point) using a shorter break interval (most pilots can count to 2 or 3 pretty well but beyond that we seem to have problems). It also helps to fly with the same pilots over and over again--we all have a natural, internal cadence--flying together regularly will help you get "in sync" with one another and improve your performance. Mike


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:40:49 AM PST US
    From: "doug sapp" <rvfltd@televar.com>
    Subject: Air bottles
    --> Yak-List message posted by: "doug sapp" <rvfltd@televar.com> Walt, Page 107 of the Maint and Tech Specifications for the CJ6 states that the tank is 8 liters. But now that you mention 12 liters I went to the PT-6 Trainer Aircraft Overhaul Manual for Airframe Accessories and find that it calls out 12 liters. Who is buying the beer? I'm getting a sinking feeling that it's me. But Walt is correct on one point for sure, proceed VERY carefully, you are dealing with a bomb. Always Yakin, Doug Sapp -----Original Message----- From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Walter Lannon Subject: Re: Yak-List: Air bottles --> Yak-List message posted by: "Walter Lannon" <wlannon@cablerocket.com> Dave; The CJ air tanks are 12 liters (main) and 3 liters (emerg). With the main air valve open both tanks are charged from the external supply (or from the compressor) With the main air valve closed only the small emergency tank will be charged. Arithmetic gives me a headache but here are some numbers for you that suggest you treat that 3000 psi bottle with great respect. 1. Don't know the actual size of your paintball tank but lets call it 6" dia X 24" long. That represents an internal volume of 0.3927 cu. ft. Into that is packed 72 cu ft of air or 183 tank volumes. 2. One paintball tank volume (0.3927 cu ft) = 11.12 liters 3. Without getting too involved in the arithmetic that means when you transfer that 3000 psi to the CJ main you would theoretically have slightly less than 3000 psi in that tank. If your paintball tank volume is less than my estimate then you will have more than 3000 psi. Theoretically of course since the CJ tank (and/or most of the aircraft) would have exploded long before then. Please be very cautious. You are dealing with a bomb Walt ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Laird" <dave@davelaird.com> Subject: Re: Yak-List: Air bottles > --> Yak-List message posted by: Dave Laird <dave@davelaird.com> > > > On Jan 3, 2006, at 11:20 AM, Fraser, Gus wrote: > >> --> Yak-List message posted by: "Fraser, Gus" <gus.fraser@gs.com> >> >> David, >> Remember that your 3000PSI will 'expand' to 750 psi in the main tank. >> Treat >> the paintball tank like a capacitor it has a load of charge so your >> small >> tank should give you a full charge of the 6 ltr bottle in the plane. >> >> Gus >> > > cool! thanks Gus.... I think I'm going to empty the main air this week > and then go ahead and fill it from the paintball tank to try it out! > > Dave > > > http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List > >


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:44:34 AM PST US
    From: "Scott Kirk" <pilot8kcab@hotmail.com>
    Subject: prop pitch
    --> Yak-List message posted by: "Scott Kirk" <pilot8kcab@hotmail.com> Craig, I'm curious as I have the same symptoms you describe (unable to achieve Cruise 2 settings) on my Yak-55 and we havent been able to pinpoint the cause, does/did your prop pass the normal prop tests during the runup. My prop passes the runup tests just fine but in flight the prop wont pull back to even the Cruise 1 settings without reducing power and in all honesty the Nominal 2 setting (70%) is tough to achieve without a power reduction (reducing MP). Blade angles have been checked and reset, two governors produced the same results. This metal ring you discuss is a glimmer of hope. Scott ----Original Message Follows---- From: "Mark Jefferies YAK Uk" <mark.j@yakuk.com> Subject: Yak-List: prop pitch Craig, I think you will find the one that's least course is for the Yak 50. Still there are very few of those "rings" about. Cheers, mj Time: 04:30:55 AM PST US From: "Craig Payne" <cpayne@joimail.com> Subject: Prop Parts and Pitch I'll admit that I'm always learning something new about these aircraft....no matter how long I'm around them. Since purchasing a brand new Vperiod B-530 TA six years ago I have learned lots of *stuff* about it, which parts interchange with the CJ prop, what is under the paint on the blades, etc. I have always known that the Russian paddle blades came in different blade diameters but I had assumed that everything in the hub was the same between different versions. And, I always wondered why I was unable to reduce RPM down to the Cruise II setting. Turns out that there are different sizes of that little metal ring that is attached to the end of the prop dome piston with those flat cotter pins. "Duh", my brain said when I measured the amount of coarse pitch travel that this removeable ring limits. Just 1/8" difference in ring thickness makes a big difference. Now, I'm going to get some real economy :>) Craig Payne http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:11:35 AM PST US
    From: "doug sapp" <rvfltd@televar.com>
    Subject: slow air leak
    THANK YOU GARY! I have been preaching this for years, but very few would listen to my rantings. Many expensive trouble shooting sorties could have been prevented by simply checking the nose gear retract cly first. But the "red herring" is that there is air escaping from the front cockpit gear valve, and in many cases convinces the owner/mechanic that the valve QSF-2A ($270.00) is going bad. Now, understand I just love selling $270.00 valves, but in many situations it simply will not fix the problem. A full set of nose gear retract cly seals and felts is only $40.00 if you want to tackle it yourself, or I now have all the special tools and will overhaul your cly and Fed Ex it to you for $100.00, or with epoxy primer $115.00. You do the math. I will be at ARS this year with a new ultrasonic leak detector, which I think will find even a very small high pressure leak. These units retail for about $400.00 for the good one with head phones. If it works as well as I expect it to it might be a good item to have at all the Yak gatherings on both coasts and in Nebraska. Always Yakin, Doug Sapp -----Original Message----- From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of ggg6@att.net Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 5:57 PM To: yak-list@matronics.com Subject: Re: Yak-List: slow airleak Hi Phil, Gary in LAS here, My CJ for the first seveal years I owned it, setting with the air valve turned off, would loose no air down stream of the air valve setting for weeks, then a couple of years ago it started loosing air pressure on the gauge when it sat with the air valve turned off, the gauge would read zero, I found out that the leak was because the Nose Gear Retract Cyl. Seals were slowly leaking the air while the acft sat for a number of days. Have since overhauled all the retract Cyls. and it can sit for weeks now and no lose of pressure on the air gauge... this may not be your problem, just a heads up on the retract cyl. seals....Gary Gabbard N22YK -------------- Original message from cjpilot710@aol.com: -------------- '83 CJ6A recent slow leak, 6-10 atmos in 3-4days. Suggestions to limit my search,thanks, [philipdugan1@msn.com] Philip, The first place to look is the main air valve. It could be there or the line coming off the tank. That line - I believe - is one piece from the tank to the main air valve. The valve itself is ordinary steel but the valve seat is aluminum. A natural for rusted up valve or corrosion on the seat. Jim "Pappy" Goolsby


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:18:29 AM PST US
    From: Buzzard Aviation <martin@buzzardaviation.flyer.co.uk>
    Subject: Toolbox pictures
    --> Yak-List message posted by: Buzzard Aviation <martin@buzzardaviation.flyer.co.uk> Hi all, First, a happy new year to you all. May we all fly often, with tailwinds, clear skies and no unpleasant surprises :-) I have three "different" Yak toolboxes and probably 70% of the contents of each. I understand there are photographs of complete toolkits showing what goes where and would love to get a copy of these to see if I can create one complete set of tools. Can anyone help? TIA Happy Landings ____|____ \O/ o'o Martin Robinson Auster AOP 9 G-BKVK (WZ662) Yak 18T HA-YAV --


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:26:47 AM PST US
    From: "Mark Jefferies YAK Uk" <mark.j@yakuk.com>
    Subject: formation breaks
    Someone asked about formation breaks, well take a look at the following and you will see and hear "live" the calls on how to do it, simple as that. Click to watch: Aerostars <http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4232720495256192752&q=mark+jefferi es&pr=goog-sl> in Evora Portugal flying YAK-50 and YAK-52 Mark Jefferies Description: Portugal airshow in September 1999, Pilots Andy Hammond, Mark Jefferies, Jeff Stow, Gene Wilson, Fred Basset, Gary Sharp, Mark Levy, Chris Heames. In cockpit transit flight, airshow flight and general show film. Try this link for more Aeros but they are not all in YAK's http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=mark+jefferies


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:34:06 AM PST US
    From: "Jerome Van der Schaar" <jvds30@hotmail.com>
    Subject: formation breaks
    --> Yak-List message posted by: "Jerome Van der Schaar" <jvds30@hotmail.com> Hey Mark, Did see you've sold a 52 to the Netherlands. Who is the lucky one? Jerome >From: "Mark Jefferies YAK Uk" <mark.j@yakuk.com> >Reply-To: yak-list@matronics.com >To: "'YAK USA LIST'" <yak-list@matronics.com> >Subject: Yak-List: formation breaks >Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 15:24:27 -0000 > >Someone asked about formation breaks, well take a look at the following and >you will see and hear "live" the calls on how to do it, simple as that. > >Click to watch: Aerostars ><http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4232720495256192752&q=mark+jefferi >es&pr=goog-sl> in Evora Portugal flying YAK-50 and YAK-52 Mark Jefferies > >Description: Portugal airshow in September 1999, Pilots Andy Hammond, Mark >Jefferies, Jeff Stow, Gene Wilson, Fred Basset, Gary Sharp, Mark Levy, >Chris >Heames. In cockpit transit flight, airshow flight and general show film. > >Try this link for more Aeros but they are not all in YAK's > >http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=mark+jefferies > >


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:00:06 AM PST US
    From: Brian Lloyd <brian-yak@lloyd.com>
    Subject: Re: Air bottles
    --> Yak-List message posted by: Brian Lloyd <brian-yak@lloyd.com> doug sapp wrote: > What exactly is Boyles law? P1*V1 = P2*V2 P = pressure V = volume For example: if you start with a 1 litre bottle with 100 kg/cm2 and then let that expand into a 10 litre bottle, the final pressure will be 10 Kg/cm2. This assumes that the temperature and total amount of gas remains constant. It is a specific application of the more general formula for the ideal gas law of: PV = nRT where: P = pressure V = volume n = number of moles of a gas (based on Avogadro's constant -- actually the number of molecules of the gas present in the container) R = the universal gas law constant (0.0821 liter-atm / mol-K) T = absolute temperature in degrees Kelvin (0C = 273K) This latter formula will allow you to do calculations where the temperature changes or the amount of gas present changes. If you want to know what temperature will do to the pressure of the gas, you can calculate it with this formula. -- Brian Lloyd 2243 Cattle Dr. brian-yak at lloyd dot com Folsom, CA 95630 +1.916.367.2131 (voice) +1.270.912.0788 (fax) I fly because it releases my mind from the tyranny of petty things . . . - Antoine de Saint-Exupery


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:25:19 AM PST US
    From: "Walter Lannon" <wlannon@cablerocket.com>
    Subject: Re: Air bottles
    --> Yak-List message posted by: "Walter Lannon" <wlannon@cablerocket.com> Hey Doug; We must have different Tech. Specs. manuals. Pg 107 does not mention air tanks. That is on pg. 109 and shows 12 liters. Cheers; Walt ----- Original Message ----- From: "doug sapp" <rvfltd@televar.com> Subject: RE: Yak-List: Air bottles > --> Yak-List message posted by: "doug sapp" <rvfltd@televar.com> > > Walt, > Page 107 of the Maint and Tech Specifications for the CJ6 states that the > tank is 8 liters. But now that you mention 12 liters I went to the PT-6 > Trainer Aircraft Overhaul Manual for Airframe Accessories and find that it > calls out 12 liters. Who is buying the beer? I'm getting a sinking > feeling > that it's me. > > But Walt is correct on one point for sure, proceed VERY carefully, you are > dealing with a bomb. > > Always Yakin, > Doug Sapp > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Walter Lannon > Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 7:53 PM > To: yak-list@matronics.com > Subject: Re: Yak-List: Air bottles > > > --> Yak-List message posted by: "Walter Lannon" <wlannon@cablerocket.com> > > Dave; > > The CJ air tanks are 12 liters (main) and 3 liters (emerg). With the main > air valve open both tanks are charged from the external supply (or from > the > compressor) > With the main air valve closed only the small emergency tank will be > charged. > > Arithmetic gives me a headache but here are some numbers for you that > suggest you treat that 3000 psi bottle with great respect. > > 1. Don't know the actual size of your paintball tank but lets call it 6" > dia > X 24" long. That represents an internal volume of 0.3927 cu. ft. > Into that is packed 72 cu ft of air or 183 tank volumes. > > 2. One paintball tank volume (0.3927 cu ft) = 11.12 liters > > 3. Without getting too involved in the arithmetic that means when you > transfer that 3000 psi to the CJ main you would theoretically have > slightly > less than 3000 psi in that tank. If your paintball tank volume is less > than > my estimate then you will have more than 3000 psi. Theoretically of course > since the CJ tank (and/or most of the aircraft) would have exploded long > before then. > > Please be very cautious. You are dealing with a bomb > > Walt > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dave Laird" <dave@davelaird.com> > To: <yak-list@matronics.com> > Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 9:55 AM > Subject: Re: Yak-List: Air bottles > > >> --> Yak-List message posted by: Dave Laird <dave@davelaird.com> >> >> >> On Jan 3, 2006, at 11:20 AM, Fraser, Gus wrote: >> >>> --> Yak-List message posted by: "Fraser, Gus" <gus.fraser@gs.com> >>> >>> David, >>> Remember that your 3000PSI will 'expand' to 750 psi in the main tank. >>> Treat >>> the paintball tank like a capacitor it has a load of charge so your >>> small >>> tank should give you a full charge of the 6 ltr bottle in the plane. >>> >>> Gus >>> >> >> cool! thanks Gus.... I think I'm going to empty the main air this week >> and then go ahead and fill it from the paintball tank to try it out! >> >> Dave >> >> >> >> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:17:59 AM PST US
    From: "Walter Lannon" <wlannon@cablerocket.com>
    Subject: Re: prop pitch
    --> Yak-List message posted by: "Walter Lannon" <wlannon@cablerocket.com> The "metal ring" is the factory adjustable coarse pitch stop on all V530 type propellors. I do not believe it is the cause of the symptoms described. In my opinion the cause is the low RPM limit stop screw assembly attached to the prop. governor. The governor set-up procedure described in the M14P manual is absolutely correct and is identical to the procedure in the Hamiliton Standard manual for their operationally identical equipment. However, it is quite impossible to set up in accordance with the manual due to the existance of the RPM adjustable stop assy. attached to the governor. The only way that could be accomplished is to cut the low RPM stop off of the assy. to allow the governor full travel to the low RPM position. This stop screw is worse than redundant. The correct low RPM stop assy. is contained in the governor head and is set up at governor overhaul. You cannot just remove the whole assy., the high RPM stop is necessary. With that external stop in place the governor is limiting the blade pitch to a value less than would be allowed by the PROPELLOR coarse pitch stop (the magic ring) so removing or reducing this will have no effect whatever in normal ooperation. Removing or substantially reducing the ring would not be noticed until a failure causing loss of governor oil pressure allowed the blades to go to an angle too high for the engine to handle. Don't mess with the ring. The Chinese use the same totally unnecessary stop screw but revise the manual procedure to accomodate it with no regard to the fact that their procedure is quite wrong. Walt --- Original Message ----- From: "Scott Kirk" <pilot8kcab@hotmail.com> Subject: RE: Yak-List: prop pitch --> Yak-List message posted by: "Scott Kirk" <pilot8kcab@hotmail.com> Craig, I'm curious as I have the same symptoms you describe (unable to achieve Cruise 2 settings) on my Yak-55 and we havent been able to pinpoint the cause, does/did your prop pass the normal prop tests during the runup. My prop passes the runup tests just fine but in flight the prop wont pull back to even the Cruise 1 settings without reducing power and in all honesty the Nominal 2 setting (70%) is tough to achieve without a power reduction (reducing MP). Blade angles have been checked and reset, two governors produced the same results. This metal ring you discuss is a glimmer of hope. Scott ----Original Message Follows---- From: "Mark Jefferies YAK Uk" <mark.j@yakuk.com> Subject: Yak-List: prop pitch Craig, I think you will find the one that's least course is for the Yak 50. Still there are very few of those "rings" about. Cheers, mj Time: 04:30:55 AM PST US From: "Craig Payne" <cpayne@joimail.com> Subject: Prop Parts and Pitch I'll admit that I'm always learning something new about these aircraft....no matter how long I'm around them. Since purchasing a brand new Vperiod B-530 TA six years ago I have learned lots of *stuff* about it, which parts interchange with the CJ prop, what is under the paint on the blades, etc. I have always known that the Russian paddle blades came in different blade diameters but I had assumed that everything in the hub was the same between different versions. And, I always wondered why I was unable to reduce RPM down to the Cruise II setting. Turns out that there are different sizes of that little metal ring that is attached to the end of the prop dome piston with those flat cotter pins. "Duh", my brain said when I measured the amount of coarse pitch travel that this removeable ring limits. Just 1/8" difference in ring thickness makes a big difference. Now, I'm going to get some real economy :>) Craig Payne http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:28:06 PM PST US
    From: FamilyGage@aol.com
    Subject: aerobatics
    Gentlemen: A fiend of mine, here at Spruce Creek, is seriously considering buying a Yak-52. His name is William Gantt. Will is a Southwest pilot and has been involved with competitive competition for years. He asked me to inquire from our members who may have had aerobatic experience in their Yaks to please get in touch with him. His E-mail address is _wgantt@cfl.rr.com_ (mailto:wgantt@cfl.rr.com) Thanks in advance! Ray Gage


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:45:59 PM PST US
    From: "Tom Johnson" <tomjohnson@cox.net>
    Subject: FOD CHECK~!
    --> Yak-List message posted by: "Tom Johnson" <tomjohnson@cox.net> Time for the semi-annual FOD check. Flashlight and mirror and eyeballs in the hellhole. Who gets the prize for the most atrocious piece of FOD they discover? Tj --------------------------- Thomas Johnson Airpower Insurance, LLC 36 West Ocotillo Road Phoenix, AZ 85013-1235 Tel: 602-628-2701 Fax: 623-321-5843 E: tomjohnson@cox.net


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:46:00 PM PST US
    From: "Tom Johnson" <tomjohnson@cox.net>
    Subject: Annual Inspection Checklist
    --> Yak-List message posted by: "Tom Johnson" <tomjohnson@cox.net> Does anybody have an annual inspection checklist for Yak or CJ they could email me? Prefer as a Word Document. tomjohnson@cox.net --------------------------- Thomas Johnson Airpower Insurance, LLC 36 West Ocotillo Road Phoenix, AZ 85013-1235 Tel: 602-628-2701 Fax: 623-321-5843 E: tomjohnson@cox.net


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:06:44 PM PST US
    From: Stephen Fox <jsfox@adelphia.net>
    Subject: Re: FOD CHECK~!
    On Jan 4, 2006, at 3:45 PM, Tom Johnson wrote: > Who gets the prize for the most atrocious piece of FOD they discover? Not sure this worthy of a prize, but right now searching for a nob off my transponder that came floating by my head mid loop the other day. Steve "SOB" Fox Yak 52 N3043R http://homepage.mac.com/steve.fox/PhotoAlbum5.html


    Message 20


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:44:27 PM PST US
    From: Roger Kemp <viperdoc@mindspring.com>
    Subject: Re: Annual Inspection Checklist
    --> Yak-List message posted by: Roger Kemp <viperdoc@mindspring.com> Tom, I have the YAK-52 maintance manuel. It has the required inspection items for 100hrs, 200 hrs ect. Ask Dennis Savarese...He has something he follows from his Maintance course. Doc -----Original Message----- >From: Tom Johnson <tomjohnson@cox.net> >Sent: Jan 4, 2006 2:45 PM >To: "Yak-List@Matronics. Com" <yak-list@matronics.com> >Subject: Yak-List: Annual Inspection Checklist > >--> Yak-List message posted by: "Tom Johnson" <tomjohnson@cox.net> > >Does anybody have an annual inspection checklist for Yak or CJ they could >email me? > >Prefer as a Word Document. >tomjohnson@cox.net > > >--------------------------- >Thomas Johnson >Airpower Insurance, LLC >36 West Ocotillo Road >Phoenix, AZ 85013-1235 >Tel: 602-628-2701 >Fax: 623-321-5843 >E: tomjohnson@cox.net > > > > > > >


    Message 21


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:08:41 PM PST US
    From: Bitterlich GS11 Mark G <BitterlichMG@cherrypoint.usmc.mil>
    Subject: FOD CHECK~!
    I am not sure this qualifies as FOD... but.... I purchased my YAK-50 in 1999, and soon afterwards was happily learning the capabilities of my new airplane. The one thing that bothered me was that I had a really hard time holding the aircraft from entering a spin when performing simple high angle of attack slow flight. The aircraft would BREAK very quickly and enter a spin. I could not "walk it around" using rudder like I could every other aircraft I had every flown. I attributed this to it being a "hot aircraft" and thought no more about it, other than to watch my butt during slow flight. Working into the spin regimes, the airplane kept doing things that were unexpected and sometimes pretty darn violent. Still the light did not go off in my head. A year later, while working on a tail-wheel shimmy problem, I found a 15 POUND LEAD WEIGHT mounted in the tail of the aircraft where it was impossible to see unless you removed the fairings on the elevator. This weight was actually MOUNTED with bolts in the aircraft so thus it does not really qualify as FOD in my mind.... Never-the-less, there was no log book entry for this "modification", and no apparent reason for it, other than it is well known that with an aft CG, an aircraft will SNAP much better than with a forward CG. I can only imagine this was what some one had in mind. Removing this "item" from my aircraft resulted in a dramatic change in how it flew, making it much more normal and predictable as you can imagine. I never did do the math on how far out my CG was... but it had to be so much that I really don't want to ever know about it anyway. Mark Bitterlich -----Original Message----- From: Tom Johnson [mailto:tomjohnson@cox.net] Subject: Yak-List: FOD CHECK~! --> Yak-List message posted by: "Tom Johnson" <tomjohnson@cox.net> Time for the semi-annual FOD check. Flashlight and mirror and eyeballs in the hellhole. Who gets the prize for the most atrocious piece of FOD they discover? Tj --------------------------- Thomas Johnson Airpower Insurance, LLC 36 West Ocotillo Road Phoenix, AZ 85013-1235 Tel: 602-628-2701 Fax: 623-321-5843 E: tomjohnson@cox.net


    Message 22


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:30:08 PM PST US
    From: JOE HOWSE <joeh@shaw.ca>
    Subject: BOTTLE TEST
    YAKKERS I use a local fire extinguisher company, they test and certify according to the CJ specs., label and date the bottles. Joe


    Message 23


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:24:45 PM PST US
    From: Bitterlich GS11 Mark G <BitterlichMG@cherrypoint.usmc.mil>
    Subject: Survival Vest
    Excuse me Tim, but I have to disagree. There is simply nothing in the world wrong with carrying a gun in the United States of America, although I do recommend that everyone should take the time to obtain a Concealed Carry Permit (CCW). The more law abiding people that go armed in this country, the more you will see violent crime decrease on our streets, and this is a proven statistic based on EVERY SINGLE STATE that has passed "shall issue" concealed carry laws. It is simply irrefutable and by the way... really tends to upset anti-gun folks. That said, whether carrying a weapon legally either concealed or in the open, go to: www.packing.org to find out ALL the scoop about what every state has to say about it. I used to have carry permits from a whole slew of states, now-a-days most states honor the permits from others. For example, I have a North Carolina Concealed Carry Permit, and there are only 17 states in CONUS that do NOT have complete reciprocity with North Carolina. If you examine the laws even further, you will find that even in the states where there is no reciprocity, they often will have "Friendly Travel laws" that allow you to have the weapon in baggage. I have ferried aircraft across this country, and have crossed some really desolate places where I felt a lot better carrying a weapon. In fact, I even carry one going from North Carolina to Florida! When I ferried a YAK-50 to California, all I had to do when I landed in California was to take my .45 Kimber, unload it, put it into a locked box, and carry it right into the San Diego airport and declare it to the desk agent at the airlines. She had me open it, make sure it was unloaded, locked it back up again, sealed it, and then I carried it right over to the TSA folks and away it went. No problem what-so-ever. Instead of buying a replacement survival "radio" for the vest, I would instead recommend that a person upgrade the vest in the same way the military is doing, or as close as possible that is! Purchase one of the new model survival radio BEACONS, that includes a built in GPS. These handheld units are registered to you by name and not only broadcast on 121.5 for DF purposes, but also on 406 Mhz with GPS location data, along with a "digital I.D." telling just who it is that is sending the distress call. They are a little "pricey", but how much is your life worth? Sorry for the strong response on the gun issue, but after spending 35 years (and counting)defending our Constitution, I believe people should not be afraid to exercise the rights it guarantees, otherwise... what's the point? I realize too that others may not agree and would rather avoid a possible hassle no matter what. Mark Bitterlich N50YK p.s. As an amusing anecdote, I'd like to mention that I have not had one single person ever question me when walking into an FBO with a holstered .45 strapped to my belt after climbing out of my YAK-50. In fact, I usually get faster line service! Typically though, I suggest just keeping it legally concealed, and if you do that right, you will NEVER get hassled because no one is EVER going to KNOW! -----Original Message----- From: Timothy Gagnon [mailto:NiftyYak50@msn.com] Subject: Yak-List: Survival Vest --> Yak-List message posted by: Timothy Gagnon <NiftyYak50@msn.com> I would say that only the 9mm will cause you some issues. Every state has laws regarding a the carrying of a gun. In Ohio, you can after you have taken the required training and been authorized to carry a concealed (or not) weapon. Some states simply do not allow it. I would leave the pistol at home. By the way, you can find the radio if you look hard enough. The USAF recently switched to newer radios and may be looking to dump the old ones. Check the DRMO or Ebay for one. Tim


    Message 24


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:18:23 PM PST US
    From: "Frank Haertlein" <yak52driver@earthlink.net>
    Subject: Survival Vest
    DO NOT ARCHIVE Don't worry Mark, I agree with ya. Really, I do! And if anybody disagrees well then we'll just have to shoot em' : ) Frank -----Original Message----- Excuse me Tim, but I have to disagree. There is simply nothing in the world wrong with carrying a gun in the United States of America,


    Message 25


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:08:59 PM PST US
    Subject: Survival Vest
    From: Timothy Gagnon <NiftyYak50@msn.com>
    --> Yak-List message posted by: Timothy Gagnon <NiftyYak50@msn.com> Mark, If you took my reply to the survival vest thread as anti-gun, that was not my intent. My point was that if someone chose to carry a weapon with them while they transient multiple states, they may want consider the laws pertaining to each state as to carry a weapon. It may end up not being worth the hassle. You also may run into a not so friendly law enforcement officer that would have no problem liberating the weapon. Just a thought. This has NOTHING to do with Yaks but... I have no problem with Joe Public carrying a weapon as long as that person has been trained in the use of that weapon. Me, I will be pursuing a permit this spring and also hope to attend the Federal Flight Deck Officer program in the late summer. It is taught mostly by former SpecOps and Federal Agency types. You are issued a weapon (an HK USP Sub Compact .40) and tested every six months. The training is rigorous and the testing compares with other federal law enforcement agencies. Happy New Year. Tim If I can be of assistance with some life support issues, I will. We have a great shop (best in the biz) and they are more than happy to help.


    Message 26


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:32:04 PM PST US
    From: "Roger Kemp" <viperdoc@mindspring.com>
    Subject: Survival Vest
    Mark, I'm on your side of the fence on this one. I have to make deposites for my office. I would not dream of walking up to night teller window without an exposed weapon. Not the crowd that generally roams around these days. I alter the banks I go to so as not set up a pattern as well as alter routes to and from, and alter the times as best as possible. I have a concealed weapon permit. I agree if I'm going X/C over unfamilar terittory that is desolate, I will have a weapon. May even look for a way to put my turkey shotgun in aircraft. Never felt uncomfortable about just flying with my Browning 9mm though. Doc ----- Original Message ----- From: Bitterlich GS11 Mark G Subject: RE: Yak-List: Survival Vest Excuse me Tim, but I have to disagree. There is simply nothing in the world wrong with carrying a gun in the United States of America, although I do recommend that everyone should take the time to obtain a Concealed Carry Permit (CCW). The more law abiding people that go armed in this country, the more you will see violent crime decrease on our streets, and this is a proven statistic based on EVERY SINGLE STATE that has passed "shall issue" concealed carry laws. It is simply irrefutable and by the way... really tends to upset anti-gun folks. That said, whether carrying a weapon legally either concealed or in the open, go to: www.packing.org to find out ALL the scoop about what every state has to say about it. I used to have carry permits from a whole slew of states, now-a-days most states honor the permits from others. For example, I have a North Carolina Concealed Carry Permit, and there are only 17 states in CONUS that do NOT have complete reciprocity with North Carolina. If you examine the laws even further, you will find that even in the states where there is no reciprocity, they often will have "Friendly Travel laws" that allow you to have the weapon in baggage. I have ferried aircraft across this country, and have crossed some really desolate places where I felt a lot better carrying a weapon. In fact, I even carry one going from North Carolina to Florida! When I ferried a YAK-50 to California, all I had to do when I landed in California was to take my .45 Kimber, unload it, put it into a locked box, and carry it right into the San Diego airport and declare it to the desk agent at the airlines. She had me open it, make sure it was unloaded, locked it back up again, sealed it, and then I carried it right over to the TSA folks and away it went. No problem what-so-ever. Instead of buying a replacement survival "radio" for the vest, I would instead recommend that a person upgrade the vest in the same way the military is doing, or as close as possible that is! Purchase one of the new model survival radio BEACONS, that includes a built in GPS. These handheld units are registered to you by name and not only broadcast on 121.5 for DF purposes, but also on 406 Mhz with GPS location data, along with a "digital I.D." telling just who it is that is sending the distress call. They are a little "pricey", but how much is your life worth? Sorry for the strong response on the gun issue, but after spending 35 years (and counting)defending our Constitution, I believe people should not be afraid to exercise the rights it guarantees, otherwise... what's the point? I realize too that others may not agree and would rather avoid a possible hassle no matter what. Mark Bitterlich N50YK p.s. As an amusing anecdote, I'd like to mention that I have not had one single person ever question me when walking into an FBO with a holstered .45 strapped to my belt after climbing out of my YAK-50. In fact, I usually get faster line service! Typically though, I suggest just keeping it legally concealed, and if you do that right, you will NEVER get hassled because no one is EVER going to KNOW! -----Original Message----- From: Timothy Gagnon [mailto:NiftyYak50@msn.com] Subject: Yak-List: Survival Vest --> Yak-List message posted by: Timothy Gagnon <NiftyYak50@msn.com> I would say that only the 9mm will cause you some issues. Every state has laws regarding a the carrying of a gun. In Ohio, you can after you have taken the required training and been authorized to carry a concealed (or not) weapon. Some states simply do not allow it. I would leave the pistol at home. By the way, you can find the radio if you look hard enough. The USAF recently switched to newer radios and may be looking to dump the old ones. Check the DRMO or Ebay for one. Tim browse Subscriptions page, Chat, FAQ, ">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List support! ">http://www.matronics.com/contribution


    Message 27


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:04:06 PM PST US
    From: Bitterlich GS11 Mark G <BitterlichMG@cherrypoint.usmc.mil>
    Subject: Survival Vest
    No Tim, honestly I did not take your reply as "Anti-Gun". I would find it hard to believe that anyone with military experience would ever have that view, and I know you have a lot of time in the Air Force, so I never even thought that for an instant. I am also sure that you are correct in that there are a number of "not so bright" law enforcement types that could indeed make your life miserable should they so choose. The fact is, I ran into one just like that once! (But never in an airplane) I say a prayer that such officers are a very small minority, and to date that has seemed to be the case. I guess the only point I was trying to make was that even if there is the possibility of a hassle.... I believe that those of us in this country that accept the responsibility of carrying a firearm (which is soon to be you too) need to do so whenever possible. To exercise your rights or privileges in a responsible manner is to me... a way of making sure you will keep them and keep acting responsibly when doing so. Carrying a gun indeed has little to do with flying.... but carrying it WHILE flying I do think qualifies as a reasonable subject for discussion even on the YAK list. If someone chews my butt and disagrees, I'll respect that too! Regardless, I thought it worth talking about and discussing at least once. I applaud your obtaining a CCW permit, and most especially in taking the time to attend and to qualify for a Federal Flight Deck Officer endorsement! We need as many good people/Aircrew as we can to do this and it is a program that has long been overdue. Good Luck! Happy Holidays, Mark Bitterlich -----Original Message----- From: Timothy Gagnon [mailto:NiftyYak50@msn.com] Subject: Yak-List: Survival Vest --> Yak-List message posted by: Timothy Gagnon <NiftyYak50@msn.com> Mark, If you took my reply to the survival vest thread as anti-gun, that was not my intent. My point was that if someone chose to carry a weapon with them while they transient multiple states, they may want consider the laws pertaining to each state as to carry a weapon. It may end up not being worth the hassle. You also may run into a not so friendly law enforcement officer that would have no problem liberating the weapon. Just a thought. This has NOTHING to do with Yaks but... I have no problem with Joe Public carrying a weapon as long as that person has been trained in the use of that weapon. Me, I will be pursuing a permit this spring and also hope to attend the Federal Flight Deck Officer program in the late summer. It is taught mostly by former SpecOps and Federal Agency types. You are issued a weapon (an HK USP Sub Compact .40) and tested every six months. The training is rigorous and the testing compares with other federal law enforcement agencies. Happy New Year. Tim If I can be of assistance with some life support issues, I will. We have a great shop (best in the biz) and they are more than happy to help.


    Message 28


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:12:02 PM PST US
    From: Bitterlich GS11 Mark G <BitterlichMG@cherrypoint.usmc.mil>
    Subject: Survival Vest
    DO NOT ARCHIVE No Frank.... if we shoot them it will make guns look bad. Too many people think that guns are evil anyway... except those people in England, Canada and Australia... who have seen around a 600% increase in violent crime since (most if not all) firearms were made illegal. Never-the-less, if anyone disagrees we need to kill them with a weapon without the evil reputation that guns have. Say a CHAINSAW for instance... heck, they might even make a movie about it. The YAK LIST CHAINSAW MASSACRE. Has kind of a nice ring to it...... mgb p.s. Sorry... this was probably over the top. -----Original Message----- From: Frank Haertlein [mailto:yak52driver@earthlink.net] Subject: Yak-List: Survival Vest DO NOT ARCHIVE Don't worry Mark, I agree with ya. Really, I do! And if anybody disagrees well then we'll just have to shoot em' : ) Frank -----Original Message----- Excuse me Tim, but I have to disagree. There is simply nothing in the world wrong with carrying a gun in the United States of America,


    Message 29


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:25:48 PM PST US
    From: "A. Dennis Savarese" <dsavarese@elmore.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: Annual Inspection Checklist
    --> Yak-List message posted by: "A. Dennis Savarese" <dsavarese@elmore.rr.com> Tom, I have an 18 page comprehensive Yak inspection guide that I sell for $30. It is a Word document on CD. Let me know if you want it. Happy new year, Dennis ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Johnson" <tomjohnson@cox.net> Subject: Yak-List: Annual Inspection Checklist > --> Yak-List message posted by: "Tom Johnson" <tomjohnson@cox.net> > > Does anybody have an annual inspection checklist for Yak or CJ they could > email me? > > Prefer as a Word Document. > tomjohnson@cox.net > > > --------------------------- > Thomas Johnson > Airpower Insurance, LLC > 36 West Ocotillo Road > Phoenix, AZ 85013-1235 > Tel: 602-628-2701 > Fax: 623-321-5843 > E: tomjohnson@cox.net > > >


    Message 30


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:02:30 PM PST US
    From: Brian Lloyd <brian-yak@lloyd.com>
    Subject: Re: Survival Vest
    --> Yak-List message posted by: Brian Lloyd <brian-yak@lloyd.com> Bitterlich GS11 Mark G wrote: > No Tim, honestly I did not take your reply as "Anti-Gun". I would find > it hard to believe that anyone with military experience would ever have > that view, and I know you have a lot of time in the Air Force, so I > never even thought that for an instant. > > I am also sure that you are correct in that there are a number of "not > so bright" law enforcement types that could indeed make your life > miserable should they so choose. The fact is, I ran into one just like > that once! (But never in an airplane) I say a prayer that such officers > are a very small minority, and to date that has seemed to be the case. I unfortunately experienced that with the boys from Customs/DHS at Ft. Lauderdale Hollywood airport. I had my 1911A1 with me as I was on my way to a class in NV when one of them looked at my gun case and asked very pointedly asked if I had a firearm and, if so, why I did not declare my firearm (my own airplane). I tried to point out that, based on the Firearm Owner's Protection Act of 1986, I was in transit from a place where my weapon was legal (USVI) to a place where my firearm was legal (Nevada) and therefore was within the law. I also pointed out that the standard customs paperwork had no place to declare a firearm. It went down hill from there with the customs boys calling both the FAA and BATF trying to figure out what law I had broken. It was ugly. They held me for two hours, the longest they can hold you without arresting you, before turning me out with a warning that they would be annotating my record and that they would be watching me more closely in the future. (No lie!) Oh, and they tried to get me for not having a permit in FL. (I didn't have my FL CCW then as I was on my way to take the class to get that!) Oh, and they tried to get me for stealing government property as my 1911A1 said "property of the US Government" on it. It was my father's sidearm from WW-II. > I guess the only point I was trying to make was that even if there is > the possibility of a hassle.... I believe that those of us in this > country that accept the responsibility of carrying a firearm (which is > soon to be you too) need to do so whenever possible. To exercise your > rights or privileges in a responsible manner is to me... a way of making > sure you will keep them and keep acting responsibly when doing so. I agree and it sure sounds good. Still, there are many law-enforcement personnel who are clueless as to the firearm laws in the US. This should not come as a surprise as regulation of firearms tends to be more of a function of state law than federal and with conflicting state laws to boot. > Carrying a gun indeed has little to do with flying.... but carrying it > WHILE flying I do think qualifies as a reasonable subject for discussion > even on the YAK list. If someone chews my butt and disagrees, I'll > respect that too! Regardless, I thought it worth talking about and > discussing at least once. I agree. I carry a firearm on many flights, especially when flying a single-engine aircraft across parts of the country that are less than hospitable should I be forced to land. This comes under normal aircraft survival equipment in my book. (It may be big and clunky but as handguns go, I just like the 1911A1. If I am ever forced to shoot someone I want them to stay shot. I think that the .45acp round will do a better job of that than the 9mm Luger round. And I wouldn't expect even a .45acp round to have much effect on an angry bear. YMMV.) > I applaud your obtaining a CCW permit, and most especially in taking the > time to attend and to qualify for a Federal Flight Deck Officer > endorsement! We need as many good people/Aircrew as we can to do this > and it is a program that has long been overdue. Good Luck! I agree. The current administration fought this tooth and nail. Now that you have the opportunity to carry in the cockpit, you should. And you should get good training to go with it. Frankly, the best defensive firearm training I have encountered is at Front Sight near Las Vegas. I recommend it highly. -- Brian Lloyd 2243 Cattle Dr. brian-yak at lloyd dot com Folsom, CA 95630 +1.916.367.2131 (voice) +1.270.912.0788 (fax) I fly because it releases my mind from the tyranny of petty things . . . - Antoine de Saint-Exupery


    Message 31


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:13:53 PM PST US
    From: Barry Hancock <barry@flyredstar.org>
    Subject: Journey complete!
    --> Yak-List message posted by: Barry Hancock <barry@flyredstar.org> Gang, I'm pleased to say that 2 CJ's were offloaded from the container at Chino this evening with no dings, dents, damage or blood! ;) It was dark when we were finished, but I'm impressed beyond expectation with these aircraft. Hundreds of new and IRAN'd parts, each and every one clearly documented, right down to bolts and screws. The workmanship on the stainless firewalls is better than I had hoped for. Frankly, after 4 years and I don't want to tell you how much money on my CJ, I'm really jealous of these airplanes! I'll have pictures on our web site (www.cj6.com) shortly. As a guys aside, it was also one impressive rig that delivered the container and unloaded the planes. Journey complete, now the transformation from Chinese stock to US refinement begins. If you'd like more info on these airplanes, visit our web site and/or contact me directly at bhancock@worldwidewarbirds.com. Cheers, Barry Barry Hancock President Worldwide Warbirds, Inc. 1-866-L39-JETS cell (949) 300-5510 www.worldwidewarbirds.com www.sharedsquadrons.com www.cj6.com




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   yak-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Yak-List.htm
  • Full Archive Search Engine
  •   http://www.matronics.com/search
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/yak-list
  • Browse Yak-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/yak-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contributions

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --