Yak-List Digest Archive

Fri 04/21/06


Total Messages Posted: 32



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 03:50 AM - Re: Tool Needed for CJ6a (Craig Payne)
     2. 04:53 AM - Re: Good Weather Site (David McGirt)
     3. 04:54 AM - Re: Scott Crossfield (A. Dennis Savarese)
     4. 05:04 AM - Re: Good Weather Site (A. Dennis Savarese)
     5. 05:31 AM - Re: Good Weather Site (Tim Gagnon)
     6. 05:32 AM - Re: Scott Crossfield (Stephen Fox)
     7. 05:34 AM - Re: Re: Air.....in an emergency. (A. Dennis Savarese)
     8. 07:02 AM - Fw: Fw: Good Weather Site (cgalley)
     9. 07:07 AM - Re: Scott Crossfield (Fraser, Gus)
    10. 07:47 AM - Re: Re: Air.....in an emergency. (DaBear)
    11. 07:55 AM - Re: Re: Air.....in an emergency. (A. Dennis Savarese)
    12. 08:05 AM - Re: Scott Crossfield (Ben Marsh)
    13. 08:05 AM - Re: Re: Air.....in an emergency. (Jim Bernier)
    14. 08:15 AM - Re: Air.....in an emergency. (Tim Gagnon)
    15. 08:53 AM - Re: Scott Crossfield (Roger Kemp)
    16. 12:33 PM - Re: Re: Air.....in an emergency. (Bitterlich GS11 Mark G)
    17. 12:35 PM - ARS Bad Boy Blowout (Craig Payne)
    18. 12:42 PM - Re: Re: Tool Needed for CJ6a (doug sapp)
    19. 12:48 PM - Re: Re: Air.....in an emergency. (Bitterlich GS11 Mark G)
    20. 12:55 PM - Re: Re: Air.....in an emergency. (Jim Bernier)
    21. 01:04 PM - Re: Tool Needed for CJ6a (Bitterlich GS11 Mark G)
    22. 01:31 PM - Re: Re: Air.....in an emergency. (Bitterlich GS11 Mark G)
    23. 02:04 PM -  (Bitterlich GS11 Mark G)
    24. 02:13 PM - Re:  (John W. Hilterman Jr.)
    25. 02:27 PM - Re:  (Ben Marsh)
    26. 02:42 PM - Re:  (Francis Butler)
    27. 02:59 PM - RPM failure (Jerome van der Schaar)
    28. 03:09 PM - Re: RPM failure (Bitterlich GS11 Mark G)
    29. 04:20 PM - Hanger Parts Clearance (Craig Payne)
    30. 08:32 PM - Re: RPM failure (A. Dennis Savarese)
    31. 08:32 PM - new helmet (napeone)
    32. 10:04 PM - Re: RPM failure (Jerome van der Schaar)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:50:26 AM PST US
    From: "Craig Payne" <cpayne@joimail.com>
    Subject: Re: Tool Needed for CJ6a
    >--> Yak-List message posted by: "mgdimarco" <mgdimarco@yahoo.com> > >Anyone got a line on a spanner wrench for prop removal? For that matter, how about >an entire tool kit for the CJ or Yak? > Call Doug Sapp. If you are talking about the hub wrench, the same spanner fits the CJ and Russian prop. If you mean the 55mm pulling nut, then a 2-3/8" socket will do in a pinch. Craig Payne


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:53:38 AM PST US
    From: "David McGirt" <david@mcgirt.net>
    Subject: Good Weather Site
    One follow up for all you true geeks - It is worth mentioning that this site (by Dan Checkoway) is also mobile enabled. You can get METARs and TAFs from your phone browser, and there is also a text message feature...send a text message to METAR@rvroject.com with the airport identifier in the subject, and you get a reply with the weather info. _____ From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of David McGirt Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 10:10 AM Subject: Yak-List: Good Weather Site This link is probably worth adding to your bookmarks: http://www.rvproject.com/wx/ It's a privately operated site with a really nice text weather page for airports. Go to the bottom where it lets you Customize Location, and put in your airport with a 50 mile radius. Nice little tool when your trying to quickly assess your chances for flying. And of course, you already know about www.flightcentral.net/superwx


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:54:14 AM PST US
    From: "A. Dennis Savarese" <dsavarese@elmore.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: Scott Crossfield
    --> Yak-List message posted by: "A. Dennis Savarese" <dsavarese@elmore.rr.com> Jerry, THAT was very moving. You should seriously consider sending it to the EAA to be published in the next Sport Aviation magazine. I doubt any editor could say anything more eloquent than that about Scott Crossfield. For those that do not know where Prattville, Alabama is, which is where Scott Crossfield kept his 210, it is just north of Maxwell AFB and just outside the Class D airspace, which is the Montgomery, AL area. Dennis ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jerry Painter" <wild.blue@verizon.net> Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 1:21 AM Subject: Yak-List: Scott Crossfield > --> Yak-List message posted by: "Jerry Painter" <wild.blue@verizon.net> > > When I was a kid in the aftermath of the Big One, when jets were dangerous > New Things and rockets had men for guidance systems, I read avidly about > the > exploits of Bill Bridgeman, Joe Walker, Al White, Mel Apt and many > others--real heroes forging new paths in engineering and > aeronautics--dreaming that some day I would do the same. I, too, wanted to > be an experimental test pilot, the guy in the pointy end, a renaissance > man > of aeronautics, part engineer, part Leonardo, part athlete, part warrior, > a > man of intellect, daring and skill. > > > Scott Crossfield was one of my heroes. I'm a Seattle boy and he had > studied > aeronautical engineering at the University of Washington, in my home town. > Boeing was a bomber and airliner factory, it was the Cold War, Seattle was > a > hard core airplane town and us kids designed and built tons of models, > read > the books and magazines, drew pictures of airplanes all day long in school > and thought "Strategic Air Command" was the best movie ever made. We all > wanted to fly. I even had a hobby shop in the basement because no store > would stock the stuff we needed to build competition models. My AMA > number > was 10124. We were boy engineers, control line and free flight test > pilots, > too poor to afford radio control, longing to grow up and do the real > thing. > > > Two airplanes really caught my attention: the F-104 and the X-15. Those > were the airplanes I hoped to fly someday, or more powerful, faster, > higher > flying successors. I wanted to go Mach 6, too. > > > Years later, dreams partly fulfilled, watching and listening to Crossfield > on TV describing test running the XR-99 rocket engine in the X-15, the > first > throttleable rocket engine, he again personified my idea of what a pilot > and > man should be. He told a story that went something like "the airplane is > firmly chained to the ground, they strap you into the cockpit, get > everything prepared and then all go inside a concrete block house before > you > actually fire the thing off. This is called building the confidence of > the > pilot." Code words describing the potential for violent death that > awaited > the unlucky, unprepared or less skilled. "The Right Stuff" wasn't just > the > title of a book or movie, it was what you hoped would keep you alive and > Scott Crossfield was the man on the leading edge of the the greatest > adventure ever. > > > You've seen the film: after they all go to the block house, Crossfield > fires the XR-99. Everything seems to be going well, then it looks like > he's > throttling it back, but the fire sputters and goes out. After what seems > like a very long pause, the whole thing blows up in no uncertain way. > Miraculously, Crossfield was unhurt. A crewman, mistakenly thinking > Crossfield was in great danger and probably seriously injured, rushed to > the > cockpit. Crossfield tried to wave him off, he was OK, but the crewman > opened the canopy with bare hands, suffering terrible burns and dragged > Crossfield to "safety." > > > Later, during an early test flight, he encountered control problems and > had > to return to land, still heavy with fuel. On final approach he got into > serious pitch PIO, finally landing on the skids attached to the aft > fuselage > then the nose slammed to the ground and the fuselage broke in two just > behind the cockpit. Again, Crossfield was unhurt. > > > When the Wright brothers centennial came around there was Crossfield > again, > working on a replica. He was at Oshkosh. He was in Seattle at the Museum > of Flight. He was on TV. After almost fifty years, almost forgotten, he > had made his way back into the spotlight. He owned a Cessna 210. > > > I was in the hangar when a friend came by to ask if I knew who Scott > Crossfield was. Yes, I knew who he was, why? He was dead. Killed in an > airplane accident, no details. When I checked my email later, EAA had a > bulletin saying it was true. Killed in his 210. He was 84. > > > A lousy way to die. > > > I didn't know you and you didn't know me, but you meant more to me than > you could ever know, Scott, and I will miss you, but I won't forget you. > > >


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:04:08 AM PST US
    From: "A. Dennis Savarese" <dsavarese@elmore.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: Good Weather Site
    I've been using the RVPROJECT weather site for over a year and a half and had no idea it was mobile enabled. WOW! I'm going to immediately give that a try. Thanks Dave. Dennis ----- Original Message ----- From: David McGirt To: yak-list@matronics.com Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 6:51 AM Subject: RE: Yak-List: Good Weather Site One follow up for all you true geeks - It is worth mentioning that this site (by Dan Checkoway) is also mobile enabled. You can get METARs and TAFs from your phone browser, and there is also a text message feature...send a text message to METAR@rvroject.com with the airport identifier in the subject, and you get a reply with the weather info. From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of David McGirt Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 10:10 AM To: yak-list@matronics.com Subject: Yak-List: Good Weather Site This link is probably worth adding to your bookmarks: http://www.rvproject.com/wx/ It's a privately operated site with a really nice text weather page for airports. Go to the bottom where it lets you Customize Location, and put in your airport with a 50 mile radius. Nice little tool when your trying to quickly assess your chances for flying. And of course, you already know about www.flightcentral.net/superwx


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:31:11 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Good Weather Site
    From: "Tim Gagnon" <NiftyYak50@msn.com>
    --> Yak-List message posted by: "Tim Gagnon" <NiftyYak50@msn.com> I use a few of the following. Since I am not a big fan of flying the -50 cross country, I use it more for local weather. When I fly for money (my real job) they give us all the weather and NOTAMS any one man can hope for. www.wunderground.com For some serious geeking out: http://earth.google.com/download-earth.html Then use this plug in for some great WX overlays and other handy aviation features. You will have to go another site but I know this guy personally and he is a solid dude. You will not be directed to some porn site. It will down load a Google Earth Specific file. It is really cool and Yariv put some work into this. Trust me, it will not infect your computer. http://yariv.levin.net/WX-3.kmz Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=29830#29830


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:32:56 AM PST US
    From: Stephen Fox <jsfox@adelphia.net>
    Subject: Re: Scott Crossfield
    --> Yak-List message posted by: Stephen Fox <jsfox@adelphia.net> Allow me to add my praise as well, a very moving and heart felt piece. Dennis is right, I don't think there's a writer out there who can say it any better. Steve Fox On Apr 21, 2006, at 7:53 AM, A. Dennis Savarese wrote: > --> Yak-List message posted by: "A. Dennis Savarese" > <dsavarese@elmore.rr.com> > > Jerry, > THAT was very moving. You should seriously consider sending it to > the EAA to be published in the next Sport Aviation magazine. I > doubt any editor could say anything more eloquent than that about > Scott Crossfield. > > For those that do not know where Prattville, Alabama is, which is > where Scott Crossfield kept his 210, it is just north of Maxwell > AFB and just outside the Class D airspace, which is the Montgomery, > AL area. > Dennis > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jerry Painter" > <wild.blue@verizon.net> > To: <yak-list@matronics.com> > Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 1:21 AM > Subject: Yak-List: Scott Crossfield > > >> --> Yak-List message posted by: "Jerry Painter" >> <wild.blue@verizon.net> >> >> When I was a kid in the aftermath of the Big One, when jets were >> dangerous >> New Things and rockets had men for guidance systems, I read avidly >> about the >> exploits of Bill Bridgeman, Joe Walker, Al White, Mel Apt and many >> others--real heroes forging new paths in engineering and >> aeronautics--dreaming that some day I would do the same. I, too, >> wanted to >> be an experimental test pilot, the guy in the pointy end, a >> renaissance man >> of aeronautics, part engineer, part Leonardo, part athlete, part >> warrior, a >> man of intellect, daring and skill. >> >> >> >> Scott Crossfield was one of my heroes. I'm a Seattle boy and he >> had studied >> aeronautical engineering at the University of Washington, in my >> home town. >> Boeing was a bomber and airliner factory, it was the Cold War, >> Seattle was a >> hard core airplane town and us kids designed and built tons of >> models, read >> the books and magazines, drew pictures of airplanes all day long >> in school >> and thought "Strategic Air Command" was the best movie ever made. >> We all >> wanted to fly. I even had a hobby shop in the basement because no >> store >> would stock the stuff we needed to build competition models. My >> AMA number >> was 10124. We were boy engineers, control line and free flight >> test pilots, >> too poor to afford radio control, longing to grow up and do the >> real thing. >> >> >> >> Two airplanes really caught my attention: the F-104 and the >> X-15. Those >> were the airplanes I hoped to fly someday, or more powerful, >> faster, higher >> flying successors. I wanted to go Mach 6, too. >> >> >> >> Years later, dreams partly fulfilled, watching and listening to >> Crossfield >> on TV describing test running the XR-99 rocket engine in the X-15, >> the first >> throttleable rocket engine, he again personified my idea of what a >> pilot and >> man should be. He told a story that went something like "the >> airplane is >> firmly chained to the ground, they strap you into the cockpit, get >> everything prepared and then all go inside a concrete block house >> before you >> actually fire the thing off. This is called building the >> confidence of the >> pilot." Code words describing the potential for violent death >> that awaited >> the unlucky, unprepared or less skilled. "The Right Stuff" wasn't >> just the >> title of a book or movie, it was what you hoped would keep you >> alive and >> Scott Crossfield was the man on the leading edge of the the greatest >> adventure ever. >> >> >> >> You've seen the film: after they all go to the block house, >> Crossfield >> fires the XR-99. Everything seems to be going well, then it looks >> like he's >> throttling it back, but the fire sputters and goes out. After >> what seems >> like a very long pause, the whole thing blows up in no uncertain way. >> Miraculously, Crossfield was unhurt. A crewman, mistakenly thinking >> Crossfield was in great danger and probably seriously injured, >> rushed to the >> cockpit. Crossfield tried to wave him off, he was OK, but the >> crewman >> opened the canopy with bare hands, suffering terrible burns and >> dragged >> Crossfield to "safety." >> >> >> >> Later, during an early test flight, he encountered control >> problems and had >> to return to land, still heavy with fuel. On final approach he >> got into >> serious pitch PIO, finally landing on the skids attached to the >> aft fuselage >> then the nose slammed to the ground and the fuselage broke in two >> just >> behind the cockpit. Again, Crossfield was unhurt. >> >> >> >> When the Wright brothers centennial came around there was >> Crossfield again, >> working on a replica. He was at Oshkosh. He was in Seattle at >> the Museum >> of Flight. He was on TV. After almost fifty years, almost >> forgotten, he >> had made his way back into the spotlight. He owned a Cessna 210. >> >> >> >> I was in the hangar when a friend came by to ask if I knew who Scott >> Crossfield was. Yes, I knew who he was, why? He was dead. >> Killed in an >> airplane accident, no details. When I checked my email later, EAA >> had a >> bulletin saying it was true. Killed in his 210. He was 84. >> >> >> >> A lousy way to die. >> >> >> >> I didn't know you and you didn't know me, but you meant more to me >> than you could ever know, Scott, and I will miss you, but I won't >> forget you. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List > wiki.matronics.com > >


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:34:18 AM PST US
    From: "A. Dennis Savarese" <dsavarese@elmore.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: Air.....in an emergency.
    Usually if you have less than 20 atmospheres in the tank, the blades won't turn. There are some engines that will start on pure Nitrogen and some, like mine, that absolutely says, "ain't no way I'M going to start on that stuff". Recently someone posted the best explanation I've read on the subject which was related to the timing of the airstart distributor. Dennis ----- Original Message ----- From: Sarah Tobin To: yak-list@matronics.com Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 10:43 PM Subject: Yak-List: Re: Air.....in an emergency. Tank was completely empty. I don't have a gauge to tell you how empty, but I couldn't get a single blade to turn and the air dump didn't have any air to dump. Yup no prob starting it up on pure nitro, after all you breathe 79% of it. Throw the spears, getting used to it now.... Smash "A. Dennis Savarese" <dsavarese@elmore.rr.com> wrote: Smash, Was your air tank completely empty or did you have some air left in it? If there was air in it, how many ATM's. There have been numerous discussions on the List as to whether the M14P will start on pure nitrogen vs. a mixture of Nitrogen and breathing air. I really don't want to open up that can of worms again. Dennis ----- Original Message ----- From: Sarah Tobin To: yak-list@matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 2:25 PM Subject: Re: Yak-List: Air.....in an emergency. Well, since this *just* happened to me...ask the mx dudes for Nitrogen. Filled up the tank and the booger started right up. Smash Tim Gagnon <NiftyYak50@msn.com> wrote: --> Yak-List message posted by: "Tim Gagnon" Say your out on a cross country with one leg home and you have stoped for gas. You get back to the airplane and for some reason your air supply is gone.


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:02:59 AM PST US
    From: "cgalley" <cgalley@qcbc.org>
    Subject: Good Weather Site
    --> Yak-List message posted by: "cgalley" <cgalley@qcbc.org> I am re-posting as the link was mis-spelled. The correct link is METAR@rvproject.com and has been corrected in the body of text as well. Cy Galley - Bellanca Champion Club Newsletter Editor-in-Chief & EAA TC www.bellanca-championclub.com Actively supporting Bellancas every day ----- Original Message ----- From: "cgalley" <cgalley@qcbc.org> Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 7:11 AM Subject: B: Fw: Yak-List: Good Weather Site FYI ----- Original Message ----- From: David McGirt Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 6:51 AM Subject: RE: Yak-List: Good Weather Site One follow up for all you true geeks - It is worth mentioning that this site (by Dan Checkoway) is also mobile enabled. You can get METARs and TAFs from your phone browser, and there is also a text message feature...send a text message to METAR@rvproject.com with the airport identifier in the subject, and you get a reply with the weather info. From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of David McGirt Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 10:10 AM Subject: Yak-List: Good Weather Site This link is probably worth adding to your bookmarks: http://www.rvproject.com/wx/ It's a privately operated site with a really nice text weather page for airports. Go to the bottom where it lets you Customize Location, and put in your airport with a 50 mile radius. Nice little tool when your trying to quickly assess your chances for flying. And of course, you already know about www.flightcentral.net/superwx


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:07:55 AM PST US
    From: "Fraser, Gus" <gus.fraser@gs.com>
    Subject: Scott Crossfield
    --> Yak-List message posted by: "Fraser, Gus" <gus.fraser@gs.com> Two years ago I was at OSH. I was sitting at the tables outside the WB building chatting with my friend Erik Lindbergh (it gets better) just shooting the s &t. Then we noticed a group of older gentlemen to the side on the next table. It was Scott Crossfield, Chuck Yeager, Neil Armstrong & John Glenn. Talk about being in the presence of greatness. Both Erik and I were dumb struck, of course we just wanted to say hi but we held off of that and just enjoyed the moment. These guys and what they did is a large part of why I fly today. I always think that pilot is a verb not a noun. Anyone can fly a plane but it takes a special person to pilot a plane. You can keep all the super aircraft, all the special trips etc etc. You know when you look at something a realize how important it is from a historical perspective, well this was one of those moments. I am sure we will all take a couple of minutes next time we fly to say thanks to Scott for the inspiration he provided. Gus -----Original Message----- From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Fox Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 8:32 AM Subject: Re: Yak-List: Scott Crossfield --> Yak-List message posted by: Stephen Fox <jsfox@adelphia.net> Allow me to add my praise as well, a very moving and heart felt piece. Dennis is right, I don't think there's a writer out there who can say it any better. Steve Fox On Apr 21, 2006, at 7:53 AM, A. Dennis Savarese wrote: > --> Yak-List message posted by: "A. Dennis Savarese" > <dsavarese@elmore.rr.com> > > Jerry, > THAT was very moving. You should seriously consider sending it to the > EAA to be published in the next Sport Aviation magazine. I doubt any > editor could say anything more eloquent than that about Scott > Crossfield. > > For those that do not know where Prattville, Alabama is, which is > where Scott Crossfield kept his 210, it is just north of Maxwell AFB > and just outside the Class D airspace, which is the Montgomery, AL > area. > Dennis > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jerry Painter" > <wild.blue@verizon.net> > To: <yak-list@matronics.com> > Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 1:21 AM > Subject: Yak-List: Scott Crossfield > > >> --> Yak-List message posted by: "Jerry Painter" >> <wild.blue@verizon.net> >> >> When I was a kid in the aftermath of the Big One, when jets were >> dangerous New Things and rockets had men for guidance systems, I read >> avidly about the exploits of Bill Bridgeman, Joe Walker, Al White, >> Mel Apt and many others--real heroes forging new paths in engineering >> and aeronautics--dreaming that some day I would do the same. I, too, >> wanted to be an experimental test pilot, the guy in the pointy end, a >> renaissance man of aeronautics, part engineer, part Leonardo, part >> athlete, part warrior, a man of intellect, daring and skill. >> >> >> >> Scott Crossfield was one of my heroes. I'm a Seattle boy and he had >> studied aeronautical engineering at the University of Washington, in >> my home town. >> Boeing was a bomber and airliner factory, it was the Cold War, >> Seattle was a hard core airplane town and us kids designed and built >> tons of models, read the books and magazines, drew pictures of >> airplanes all day long in school >> and thought "Strategic Air Command" was the best movie ever made. >> We all >> wanted to fly. I even had a hobby shop in the basement because no >> store would stock the stuff we needed to build competition models. >> My AMA number was 10124. We were boy engineers, control line and >> free flight test pilots, too poor to afford radio control, longing to >> grow up and do the real thing. >> >> >> >> Two airplanes really caught my attention: the F-104 and the X-15. >> Those were the airplanes I hoped to fly someday, or more powerful, >> faster, higher flying successors. I wanted to go Mach 6, too. >> >> >> >> Years later, dreams partly fulfilled, watching and listening to >> Crossfield on TV describing test running the XR-99 rocket engine in >> the X-15, the first throttleable rocket engine, he again personified >> my idea of what a pilot and man should be. He told a story that went >> something like "the airplane is firmly chained to the ground, they >> strap you into the cockpit, get everything prepared and then all go >> inside a concrete block house before you actually fire the thing off. >> This is called building the confidence of the pilot." Code words >> describing the potential for violent death that awaited the unlucky, >> unprepared or less skilled. "The Right Stuff" wasn't just the title >> of a book or movie, it was what you hoped would keep you alive and >> Scott Crossfield was the man on the leading edge of the the greatest >> adventure ever. >> >> >> >> You've seen the film: after they all go to the block house, >> Crossfield fires the XR-99. Everything seems to be going well, then >> it looks like he's throttling it back, but the fire sputters and goes >> out. After what seems like a very long pause, the whole thing blows >> up in no uncertain way. >> Miraculously, Crossfield was unhurt. A crewman, mistakenly thinking >> Crossfield was in great danger and probably seriously injured, rushed >> to the cockpit. Crossfield tried to wave him off, he was OK, but the >> crewman opened the canopy with bare hands, suffering terrible burns >> and dragged Crossfield to "safety." >> >> >> >> Later, during an early test flight, he encountered control problems >> and had to return to land, still heavy with fuel. On final approach >> he got into serious pitch PIO, finally landing on the skids attached >> to the aft fuselage then the nose slammed to the ground and the >> fuselage broke in two just behind the cockpit. Again, Crossfield was >> unhurt. >> >> >> >> When the Wright brothers centennial came around there was Crossfield >> again, working on a replica. He was at Oshkosh. He was in Seattle >> at the Museum of Flight. He was on TV. After almost fifty years, >> almost forgotten, he had made his way back into the spotlight. He >> owned a Cessna 210. >> >> >> >> I was in the hangar when a friend came by to ask if I knew who Scott >> Crossfield was. Yes, I knew who he was, why? He was dead. >> Killed in an >> airplane accident, no details. When I checked my email later, EAA >> had a bulletin saying it was true. Killed in his 210. He was 84. >> >> >> >> A lousy way to die. >> >> >> >> I didn't know you and you didn't know me, but you meant more to me >> than you could ever know, Scott, and I will miss you, but I won't >> forget you. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List > wiki.matronics.com > >


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:47:56 AM PST US
    From: DaBear <dabear@damned.org>
    Subject: Re: Air.....in an emergency.
    --> Yak-List message posted by: DaBear <dabear@damned.org> However, before I buy that the air distributor is the issue. I'd like to see an engine that refuses to start on N2 get the airstart distributor adjusted so that it will. Until then, it is all theory. DaBear A. Dennis Savarese wrote: > Usually if you have less than 20 atmospheres in the tank, the blades > won't turn. There are some engines that will start on pure Nitrogen > and some, like mine, that absolutely says, "ain't no way I'M going to > start on that stuff". Recently someone posted the best explanation > I've read on the subject which was related to the timing of the > airstart distributor. > Dennis > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Sarah Tobin <mailto:aerobaticgirl@yahoo.com> > *To:* yak-list@matronics.com <mailto:yak-list@matronics.com> > *Sent:* Thursday, April 20, 2006 10:43 PM > *Subject:* Yak-List: Re: Air.....in an emergency. > > Tank was completely empty. I don't have a gauge to tell you how > empty, but I couldn't get a single blade to turn and the air dump > didn't have any air to dump. > > Yup no prob starting it up on pure nitro, after all you breathe > 79% of it. > > Throw the spears, getting used to it now.... > > Smash > > */"A. Dennis Savarese" <dsavarese@elmore.rr.com > <mailto:dsavarese@elmore.rr.com>>/* wrote: > > Smash, > Was your air tank completely empty or did you have some air > left in it? If there was air in it, how many ATM's. There > have been numerous discussions on the List as to whether the > M14P will start on pure nitrogen vs. a mixture of Nitrogen and > breathing air. I really don't want to open up that can of > worms again. > Dennis > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Sarah Tobin <mailto:aerobaticgirl@yahoo.com> > *To:* yak-list@matronics.com <mailto:yak-list@matronics.com> > *Sent:* Tuesday, April 11, 2006 2:25 PM > *Subject:* Re: Yak-List: Air.....in an emergency. > > Well, since this *just* happened to me...ask the mx dudes > for Nitrogen. Filled up the tank and the booger started > right up. > Smash > > */Tim Gagnon <NiftyYak50@msn.com > <mailto:NiftyYak50@msn.com>>/* wrote: > > --> Yak-List message posted by: "Tim Gagnon" > > Say your out on a cross country with one leg home and > you have stoped for gas. You get back to the airplane > and for some reason your air supply is gone. > > > Love cheap thrills? Enjoy PC-to-Phone calls to 30+ > countries > > > PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates. >


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:55:59 AM PST US
    From: "A. Dennis Savarese" <dsavarese@elmore.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: Air.....in an emergency.
    --> Yak-List message posted by: "A. Dennis Savarese" <dsavarese@elmore.rr.com> Yep! Good point. I think you're right. I for one will not try to adjust the air distributor on my engine just so it MIGHT start on pure Nitrogen. Dennis ----- Original Message ----- From: "DaBear" <dabear@damned.org> Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 9:46 AM Subject: Re: Yak-List: Re: Air.....in an emergency. > --> Yak-List message posted by: DaBear <dabear@damned.org> > > However, before I buy that the air distributor is the issue. I'd like > to see an engine that refuses to start on N2 get the airstart > distributor adjusted so that it will. Until then, it is all theory. > > DaBear > > A. Dennis Savarese wrote: > >> Usually if you have less than 20 atmospheres in the tank, the blades >> won't turn. There are some engines that will start on pure Nitrogen >> and some, like mine, that absolutely says, "ain't no way I'M going to >> start on that stuff". Recently someone posted the best explanation >> I've read on the subject which was related to the timing of the >> airstart distributor. >> Dennis >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> *From:* Sarah Tobin <mailto:aerobaticgirl@yahoo.com> >> *To:* yak-list@matronics.com <mailto:yak-list@matronics.com> >> *Sent:* Thursday, April 20, 2006 10:43 PM >> *Subject:* Yak-List: Re: Air.....in an emergency. >> >> Tank was completely empty. I don't have a gauge to tell you how >> empty, but I couldn't get a single blade to turn and the air dump >> didn't have any air to dump. >> >> Yup no prob starting it up on pure nitro, after all you breathe >> 79% of it. >> >> Throw the spears, getting used to it now.... >> >> Smash >> >> */"A. Dennis Savarese" <dsavarese@elmore.rr.com >> <mailto:dsavarese@elmore.rr.com>>/* wrote: >> >> Smash, >> Was your air tank completely empty or did you have some air >> left in it? If there was air in it, how many ATM's. There >> have been numerous discussions on the List as to whether the >> M14P will start on pure nitrogen vs. a mixture of Nitrogen and >> breathing air. I really don't want to open up that can of >> worms again. >> Dennis >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> *From:* Sarah Tobin <mailto:aerobaticgirl@yahoo.com> >> *To:* yak-list@matronics.com <mailto:yak-list@matronics.com> >> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 11, 2006 2:25 PM >> *Subject:* Re: Yak-List: Air.....in an emergency. >> >> Well, since this *just* happened to me...ask the mx dudes >> for Nitrogen. Filled up the tank and the booger started >> right up. >> Smash >> >> */Tim Gagnon <NiftyYak50@msn.com >> <mailto:NiftyYak50@msn.com>>/* wrote: >> >> --> Yak-List message posted by: "Tim Gagnon" >> >> Say your out on a cross country with one leg home and >> you have stoped for gas. You get back to the airplane >> and for some reason your air supply is gone. >> >> >> Love cheap thrills? Enjoy PC-to-Phone calls to 30+ >> countries >> >> >> >> >> PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates. >> > > >


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:05:01 AM PST US
    From: "Ben Marsh" <ben@designselect.net>
    Subject: Scott Crossfield
    --> Yak-List message posted by: "Ben Marsh" <ben@designselect.net> I had the pleasure of spending a few days with Scott Crossfield in the Sanders pit at the races a couple years ago. From my perspective, Mr. Crossfield was a gentle, unassuming man. He had a sparkle in his eye which communicated that he'd done it all; at the same time he was egoless, a truly unique feature among test pilots or aviators in general. I will not forget meeting and chatting with Mr. Crossfield. Oddly enough, one of the things I remember most vividly about him was his grip. Shaking hands with an 82 year old man is usually a somewhat restrained event. Mr. Crossfield's grip was quite strong. It was clear to me by that singular experience that this was a test pilot. I've met quite a few of the greats in our community, none greater than Scott Crossfield. I will say, however, that coming to one's end in an airplane is not such a lousy way to go, given that they may be no good way. It's a bit like living and dying by the sword. It sure beats forgetting who you are, who your family is or losing your functions slowly, mindful of your past. Aviation is what we do, so it's not such bad a way to go. He was solo, fighting the good fight to the end; I am certain. Still, I too am sorry Scott Crossfield has gone West. Marsh -----Original Message----- From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jerry Painter Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 11:22 PM Subject: Yak-List: Scott Crossfield --> Yak-List message posted by: "Jerry Painter" <wild.blue@verizon.net> When I was a kid in the aftermath of the Big One, when jets were dangerous New Things and rockets had men for guidance systems, I read avidly about the exploits of Bill Bridgeman, Joe Walker, Al White, Mel Apt and many others--real heroes forging new paths in engineering and aeronautics--dreaming that some day I would do the same. I, too, wanted to be an experimental test pilot, the guy in the pointy end, a renaissance man of aeronautics, part engineer, part Leonardo, part athlete, part warrior, a man of intellect, daring and skill. Scott Crossfield was one of my heroes. I'm a Seattle boy and he had studied aeronautical engineering at the University of Washington, in my home town. Boeing was a bomber and airliner factory, it was the Cold War, Seattle was a hard core airplane town and us kids designed and built tons of models, read the books and magazines, drew pictures of airplanes all day long in school and thought "Strategic Air Command" was the best movie ever made. We all wanted to fly. I even had a hobby shop in the basement because no store would stock the stuff we needed to build competition models. My AMA number was 10124. We were boy engineers, control line and free flight test pilots, too poor to afford radio control, longing to grow up and do the real thing. Two airplanes really caught my attention: the F-104 and the X-15. Those were the airplanes I hoped to fly someday, or more powerful, faster, higher flying successors. I wanted to go Mach 6, too. Years later, dreams partly fulfilled, watching and listening to Crossfield on TV describing test running the XR-99 rocket engine in the X-15, the first throttleable rocket engine, he again personified my idea of what a pilot and man should be. He told a story that went something like "the airplane is firmly chained to the ground, they strap you into the cockpit, get everything prepared and then all go inside a concrete block house before you actually fire the thing off. This is called building the confidence of the pilot." Code words describing the potential for violent death that awaited the unlucky, unprepared or less skilled. "The Right Stuff" wasn't just the title of a book or movie, it was what you hoped would keep you alive and Scott Crossfield was the man on the leading edge of the the greatest adventure ever. You've seen the film: after they all go to the block house, Crossfield fires the XR-99. Everything seems to be going well, then it looks like he's throttling it back, but the fire sputters and goes out. After what seems like a very long pause, the whole thing blows up in no uncertain way. Miraculously, Crossfield was unhurt. A crewman, mistakenly thinking Crossfield was in great danger and probably seriously injured, rushed to the cockpit. Crossfield tried to wave him off, he was OK, but the crewman opened the canopy with bare hands, suffering terrible burns and dragged Crossfield to "safety." Later, during an early test flight, he encountered control problems and had to return to land, still heavy with fuel. On final approach he got into serious pitch PIO, finally landing on the skids attached to the aft fuselage then the nose slammed to the ground and the fuselage broke in two just behind the cockpit. Again, Crossfield was unhurt. When the Wright brothers centennial came around there was Crossfield again, working on a replica. He was at Oshkosh. He was in Seattle at the Museum of Flight. He was on TV. After almost fifty years, almost forgotten, he had made his way back into the spotlight. He owned a Cessna 210. I was in the hangar when a friend came by to ask if I knew who Scott Crossfield was. Yes, I knew who he was, why? He was dead. Killed in an airplane accident, no details. When I checked my email later, EAA had a bulletin saying it was true. Killed in his 210. He was 84. A lousy way to die. I didn't know you and you didn't know me, but you meant more to me than you could ever know, Scott, and I will miss you, but I won't forget you.


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:05:01 AM PST US
    From: "Jim Bernier" <JBernier@dart.org>
    Subject: Re: Air.....in an emergency.
    --> Yak-List message posted by: "Jim Bernier" <JBernier@dart.org> Before we off the topic of air start. Does anyone know of a reason not to use the emergency air bottle as supplemental air for starting? If the plane won't start on "the ground" it would seem reasonable to use the air on the right side to support a start. Should be a simple tie in direct to the start solenoid valve through an isolation valve. Might be able to use that little red valve on my right side. I've never used it for anything to this point. After start you could always leave the gear down until a positive fill is observed. Just a thought. Jim B >>> dabear@damned.org 04/21/06 9:46 AM >>> --> Yak-List message posted by: DaBear <dabear@damned.org> However, before I buy that the air distributor is the issue. I'd like to see an engine that refuses to start on N2 get the airstart distributor adjusted so that it will. Until then, it is all theory. DaBear A. Dennis Savarese wrote: > Usually if you have less than 20 atmospheres in the tank, the blades > won't turn. There are some engines that will start on pure Nitrogen > and some, like mine, that absolutely says, "ain't no way I'M going to > start on that stuff". Recently someone posted the best explanation > I've read on the subject which was related to the timing of the > airstart distributor. > Dennis > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Sarah Tobin <mailto:aerobaticgirl@yahoo.com> > *To:* yak-list@matronics.com <mailto:yak-list@matronics.com> > *Sent:* Thursday, April 20, 2006 10:43 PM > *Subject:* Yak-List: Re: Air.....in an emergency. > > Tank was completely empty. I don't have a gauge to tell you how > empty, but I couldn't get a single blade to turn and the air dump > didn't have any air to dump. > > Yup no prob starting it up on pure nitro, after all you breathe > 79% of it. > > Throw the spears, getting used to it now.... > > Smash > > */"A. Dennis Savarese" <dsavarese@elmore.rr.com > <mailto:dsavarese@elmore.rr.com>>/* wrote: > > Smash, > Was your air tank completely empty or did you have some air > left in it? If there was air in it, how many ATM's. There > have been numerous discussions on the List as to whether the > M14P will start on pure nitrogen vs. a mixture of Nitrogen and > breathing air. I really don't want to open up that can of > worms again. > Dennis > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Sarah Tobin <mailto:aerobaticgirl@yahoo.com> > *To:* yak-list@matronics.com <mailto:yak-list@matronics.com> > *Sent:* Tuesday, April 11, 2006 2:25 PM > *Subject:* Re: Yak-List: Air.....in an emergency. > > Well, since this *just* happened to me...ask the mx dudes > for Nitrogen. Filled up the tank and the booger started > right up. > Smash > > */Tim Gagnon <NiftyYak50@msn.com > <mailto:NiftyYak50@msn.com>>/* wrote: > > --> Yak-List message posted by: "Tim Gagnon" > > Say your out on a cross country with one leg home and > you have stoped for gas. You get back to the airplane > and for some reason your air supply is gone. > > > Love cheap thrills? Enjoy PC-to-Phone calls to 30+ > countries > > > PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates. >


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:15:50 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Air.....in an emergency.
    From: "Tim Gagnon" <NiftyYak50@msn.com>
    --> Yak-List message posted by: "Tim Gagnon" <NiftyYak50@msn.com> [quote="JBernier(at)dart.org"]Before we off the topic of air start. Does anyone know of a reason not to use the emergency air bottle as supplemental air for starting? If the plane won't start on "the ground" it would seem reasonable to use the air on the right side to support a start. Should be a simple tie in direct to the start solenoid valve through an isolation valve. Might be able to use that little red valve on my right side. I've never used it for anything to this point. After start you could always leave the gear down until a positive fill is observed. Just a thought. Jim B > >> dabear@damned.org 04/21/06 9:46 AM >>> > However, before I buy that the air distributor is the issue. I'd like to see an engine that refuses to start on N2 get the airstart distributor adjusted so that it will. Until then, it is all theory. DaBear A. Dennis Savarese wrote: > Usually if you have less than 20 atmospheres in the tank, the blades > won't turn. There are some engines that will start on pure Nitrogen > and some, like mine, that absolutely says, "ain't no way I'M going to > start on that stuff". Recently someone posted the best explanation > I've read on the subject which was related to the timing of the > airstart distributor. > Dennis > > > --- Jim, I suspect you will be getting an email concering this very soon..... Tim It will not be me. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=29865#29865


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:53:37 AM PST US
    From: "Roger Kemp" <viperdoc@mindspring.com>
    Subject: Re: Scott Crossfield
    --> Yak-List message posted by: "Roger Kemp" <viperdoc@mindspring.com> Here, Here! Well said expressing the love for aviation that we all have! I too followed the exploits of the test pilots of Muroc. Can't say that Strategic Air Command was my favorite movie though. A great American Aviator has gone West! We will miss you. Doc > [Original Message] > From: Stephen Fox <jsfox@adelphia.net> > To: <yak-list@matronics.com> > Date: 4/21/2006 7:38:34 AM > Subject: Re: Yak-List: Scott Crossfield > > --> Yak-List message posted by: Stephen Fox <jsfox@adelphia.net> > > Allow me to add my praise as well, a very moving and heart felt > piece. Dennis is right, I don't think there's a writer out there who > can say it any better. > > Steve Fox > On Apr 21, 2006, at 7:53 AM, A. Dennis Savarese wrote: > > > --> Yak-List message posted by: "A. Dennis Savarese" > > <dsavarese@elmore.rr.com> > > > > Jerry, > > THAT was very moving. You should seriously consider sending it to > > the EAA to be published in the next Sport Aviation magazine. I > > doubt any editor could say anything more eloquent than that about > > Scott Crossfield. > > > > For those that do not know where Prattville, Alabama is, which is > > where Scott Crossfield kept his 210, it is just north of Maxwell > > AFB and just outside the Class D airspace, which is the Montgomery, > > AL area. > > Dennis > > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jerry Painter" > > <wild.blue@verizon.net> > > To: <yak-list@matronics.com> > > Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 1:21 AM > > Subject: Yak-List: Scott Crossfield > > > > > >> --> Yak-List message posted by: "Jerry Painter" > >> <wild.blue@verizon.net> > >> > >> When I was a kid in the aftermath of the Big One, when jets were > >> dangerous > >> New Things and rockets had men for guidance systems, I read avidly > >> about the > >> exploits of Bill Bridgeman, Joe Walker, Al White, Mel Apt and many > >> others--real heroes forging new paths in engineering and > >> aeronautics--dreaming that some day I would do the same. I, too, > >> wanted to > >> be an experimental test pilot, the guy in the pointy end, a > >> renaissance man > >> of aeronautics, part engineer, part Leonardo, part athlete, part > >> warrior, a > >> man of intellect, daring and skill. > >> > >> > >> > >> Scott Crossfield was one of my heroes. I'm a Seattle boy and he > >> had studied > >> aeronautical engineering at the University of Washington, in my > >> home town. > >> Boeing was a bomber and airliner factory, it was the Cold War, > >> Seattle was a > >> hard core airplane town and us kids designed and built tons of > >> models, read > >> the books and magazines, drew pictures of airplanes all day long > >> in school > >> and thought "Strategic Air Command" was the best movie ever made. > >> We all > >> wanted to fly. I even had a hobby shop in the basement because no > >> store > >> would stock the stuff we needed to build competition models. My > >> AMA number > >> was 10124. We were boy engineers, control line and free flight > >> test pilots, > >> too poor to afford radio control, longing to grow up and do the > >> real thing. > >> > >> > >> > >> Two airplanes really caught my attention: the F-104 and the > >> X-15. Those > >> were the airplanes I hoped to fly someday, or more powerful, > >> faster, higher > >> flying successors. I wanted to go Mach 6, too. > >> > >> > >> > >> Years later, dreams partly fulfilled, watching and listening to > >> Crossfield > >> on TV describing test running the XR-99 rocket engine in the X-15, > >> the first > >> throttleable rocket engine, he again personified my idea of what a > >> pilot and > >> man should be. He told a story that went something like "the > >> airplane is > >> firmly chained to the ground, they strap you into the cockpit, get > >> everything prepared and then all go inside a concrete block house > >> before you > >> actually fire the thing off. This is called building the > >> confidence of the > >> pilot." Code words describing the potential for violent death > >> that awaited > >> the unlucky, unprepared or less skilled. "The Right Stuff" wasn't > >> just the > >> title of a book or movie, it was what you hoped would keep you > >> alive and > >> Scott Crossfield was the man on the leading edge of the the greatest > >> adventure ever. > >> > >> > >> > >> You've seen the film: after they all go to the block house, > >> Crossfield > >> fires the XR-99. Everything seems to be going well, then it looks > >> like he's > >> throttling it back, but the fire sputters and goes out. After > >> what seems > >> like a very long pause, the whole thing blows up in no uncertain way. > >> Miraculously, Crossfield was unhurt. A crewman, mistakenly thinking > >> Crossfield was in great danger and probably seriously injured, > >> rushed to the > >> cockpit. Crossfield tried to wave him off, he was OK, but the > >> crewman > >> opened the canopy with bare hands, suffering terrible burns and > >> dragged > >> Crossfield to "safety." > >> > >> > >> > >> Later, during an early test flight, he encountered control > >> problems and had > >> to return to land, still heavy with fuel. On final approach he > >> got into > >> serious pitch PIO, finally landing on the skids attached to the > >> aft fuselage > >> then the nose slammed to the ground and the fuselage broke in two > >> just > >> behind the cockpit. Again, Crossfield was unhurt. > >> > >> > >> > >> When the Wright brothers centennial came around there was > >> Crossfield again, > >> working on a replica. He was at Oshkosh. He was in Seattle at > >> the Museum > >> of Flight. He was on TV. After almost fifty years, almost > >> forgotten, he > >> had made his way back into the spotlight. He owned a Cessna 210. > >> > >> > >> > >> I was in the hangar when a friend came by to ask if I knew who Scott > >> Crossfield was. Yes, I knew who he was, why? He was dead. > >> Killed in an > >> airplane accident, no details. When I checked my email later, EAA > >> had a > >> bulletin saying it was true. Killed in his 210. He was 84. > >> > >> > >> > >> A lousy way to die. > >> > >> > >> > >> I didn't know you and you didn't know me, but you meant more to me > >> than you could ever know, Scott, and I will miss you, but I won't > >> forget you. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List > > wiki.matronics.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:33:16 PM PST US
    From: Bitterlich GS11 Mark G <BitterlichMG@cherrypoint.usmc.mil>
    Subject: Re: Air.....in an emergency.
    I suggested the same thing about a year ago Tim. It is not hard to do. However remember that the VOLUME in the emergency air tank is much smaller and you are not going to get as many starting attempts as you would with the main bottle. For the YAK-52.... don't worry about flying it back with the gear down. Once you open your little "tie it all together valve", just leave it open and it will end up pressurizing BOTH bottles again after start. After everything is full, just close off your little valve and you are perfectly good to go again. For the YAK-50, you can close off the new little valve immediately. Your emergency air bottle ALWAYS charges off the engine compressor. Which means in your case Tim, all you need to do is to put a by-pass around the existing check valve and you will accomplish what you are talking about. That check valve is on your firewall right near the pop-off valve. Mark Bitterlich N50YK -----Original Message----- From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Tim Gagnon Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 11:15 AM Subject: Yak-List: Re: Air.....in an emergency. --> Yak-List message posted by: "Tim Gagnon" <NiftyYak50@msn.com> [quote="JBernier(at)dart.org"]Before we off the topic of air start. Does anyone know of a reason not to use the emergency air bottle as supplemental air for starting? If the plane won't start on "the ground" it would seem reasonable to use the air on the right side to support a start. Should be a simple tie in direct to the start solenoid valve through an isolation valve. Might be able to use that little red valve on my right side. I've never used it for anything to this point. After start you could always leave the gear down until a positive fill is observed. Just a thought. Jim B > >> dabear@damned.org 04/21/06 9:46 AM >>> > However, before I buy that the air distributor is the issue. I'd like to see an engine that refuses to start on N2 get the airstart distributor adjusted so that it will. Until then, it is all theory. DaBear A. Dennis Savarese wrote: > Usually if you have less than 20 atmospheres in the tank, the blades > won't turn. There are some engines that will start on pure Nitrogen > and some, like mine, that absolutely says, "ain't no way I'M going to > start on that stuff". Recently someone posted the best explanation > I've read on the subject which was related to the timing of the > airstart distributor. > Dennis > > > --- Jim, I suspect you will be getting an email concering this very soon..... Tim It will not be me. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=29865#29865


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:35:14 PM PST US
    From: "Craig Payne" <cpayne@joimail.com>
    Subject: ARS Bad Boy Blowout
    Sooo, all those Left Coast Bad Boy airplanes in one spot....Bill Blackwell Specials with high compression pistons, gap-less rings, supercharger gear hop-up, Focke-Wulf props, Malcom Hoods, extractor exhaust, etc. etc. Why not stage an informal time trial for fastest airplane? Sorta King of the West Coast. That way I'll know who to blast propwash on with my 2-Bladed Beater when I make it out next year. Prizes you ask? Well, I remember (with help from the archive) a certain 6-pack of Tsing Tao that never got delivered to me. Should be a Case by now with interest and inflation. Craig Payne


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:42:26 PM PST US
    From: "doug sapp" <rvfltd@televar.com>
    Subject: Re: Tool Needed for CJ6a
    Mike: yes I have the prop tools Tim: yes I have the 30 amp fuse Am stocking over 150K worth of parts now, give me a call, 99% of the time I can solve your problem. Always Yakin, Doug Sapp -----Original Message----- From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Craig Payne Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 3:48 AM To: yak-list Subject: Yak-List: Re: Tool Needed for CJ6a >--> Yak-List message posted by: "mgdimarco" <mgdimarco@yahoo.com> > >Anyone got a line on a spanner wrench for prop removal? For that matter, how about >an entire tool kit for the CJ or Yak? > Call Doug Sapp. If you are talking about the hub wrench, the same spanner fits the CJ and Russian prop. If you mean the 55mm pulling nut, then a 2-3/8" socket will do in a pinch. Craig Payne


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:48:31 PM PST US
    From: Bitterlich GS11 Mark G <BitterlichMG@cherrypoint.usmc.mil>
    Subject: Re: Air.....in an emergency.
    I am about to make the understatement of the century. If your M-14 air started engine now starts when you push the engine start button, DO NOT take the air distributor apart for any reason what-so-ever. The reason that I stated that it could be easily possible that one engine may start when the bottle is full of nitrogen and another may not.. POSSIBLY being due to the starting distributor being off one or more teeth from one aircraft to another, is simply because I have been there and assisted when one of the best M-14 mechanics on this planet took one off and spent the next DAY trying to get it back in, and get the engine cranking correctly. His first attempt was brilliant... he put it back in, the start button was pushed, and the engine spun around like a happy merry-go round! Only one problem. It was spinning backwards. In the end... just getting it to spin the correct way, and with enough energy to start was considered to be a happy miracle. Others warned me of this before I ever experienced it myself. I am warning every reader here. NEVER pull that darn thing out of the engine unless there is simply no way to avoid it. Mark Bitterlich N50YK p.s. So until then, it very well IS NOTHING BUT THEORY, and it will remain that way. Why? Because the kind of precise adjustment necessary to prove the point correct or incorrect is in my opinion, impossible given the tools available to us now at hand. If you feel that nothing is "impossible"... be my guest... have at it. You won't be flying again anytime soon. -----Original Message----- From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of A. Dennis Savarese Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 10:55 AM Subject: Re: Yak-List: Re: Air.....in an emergency. --> Yak-List message posted by: "A. Dennis Savarese" <dsavarese@elmore.rr.com> Yep! Good point. I think you're right. I for one will not try to adjust the air distributor on my engine just so it MIGHT start on pure Nitrogen. Dennis ----- Original Message ----- From: "DaBear" <dabear@damned.org> Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 9:46 AM Subject: Re: Yak-List: Re: Air.....in an emergency. > --> Yak-List message posted by: DaBear <dabear@damned.org> > > However, before I buy that the air distributor is the issue. I'd like > to see an engine that refuses to start on N2 get the airstart > distributor adjusted so that it will. Until then, it is all theory. > > DaBear > > A. Dennis Savarese wrote: > >> Usually if you have less than 20 atmospheres in the tank, the blades >> won't turn. There are some engines that will start on pure Nitrogen >> and some, like mine, that absolutely says, "ain't no way I'M going to >> start on that stuff". Recently someone posted the best explanation >> I've read on the subject which was related to the timing of the >> airstart distributor. >> Dennis >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> *From:* Sarah Tobin <mailto:aerobaticgirl@yahoo.com> >> *To:* yak-list@matronics.com <mailto:yak-list@matronics.com> >> *Sent:* Thursday, April 20, 2006 10:43 PM >> *Subject:* Yak-List: Re: Air.....in an emergency. >> >> Tank was completely empty. I don't have a gauge to tell you how >> empty, but I couldn't get a single blade to turn and the air dump >> didn't have any air to dump. >> >> Yup no prob starting it up on pure nitro, after all you breathe >> 79% of it. >> >> Throw the spears, getting used to it now.... >> >> Smash >> >> */"A. Dennis Savarese" <dsavarese@elmore.rr.com >> <mailto:dsavarese@elmore.rr.com>>/* wrote: >> >> Smash, >> Was your air tank completely empty or did you have some air >> left in it? If there was air in it, how many ATM's. There >> have been numerous discussions on the List as to whether the >> M14P will start on pure nitrogen vs. a mixture of Nitrogen and >> breathing air. I really don't want to open up that can of >> worms again. >> Dennis >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> *From:* Sarah Tobin <mailto:aerobaticgirl@yahoo.com> >> *To:* yak-list@matronics.com <mailto:yak-list@matronics.com> >> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 11, 2006 2:25 PM >> *Subject:* Re: Yak-List: Air.....in an emergency. >> >> Well, since this *just* happened to me...ask the mx dudes >> for Nitrogen. Filled up the tank and the booger started >> right up. >> Smash >> >> */Tim Gagnon <NiftyYak50@msn.com >> <mailto:NiftyYak50@msn.com>>/* wrote: >> >> --> Yak-List message posted by: "Tim Gagnon" >> >> Say your out on a cross country with one leg home and >> you have stoped for gas. You get back to the airplane >> and for some reason your air supply is gone. >> >> >> >> Love cheap thrills? Enjoy PC-to-Phone calls to 30+ >> countries >> >> <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/postman9/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/ev >> >> >> >> >> <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/postman3/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/ev >> PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates. >> > > >


    Message 20


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:55:07 PM PST US
    From: "Jim Bernier" <JBernier@dart.org>
    Subject: Re: Air.....in an emergency.
    --> Yak-List message posted by: "Jim Bernier" <JBernier@dart.org> Mark, Understood. I would assume that this alternative would be used off home field, after an airshow. The engine should have all cylinders clean and ready to fire. It wouldn't take much to start. and would be cheaper then carrying air around. Better then hand propping and you can never forget it in the hanger. It would seem a shame to have air aboard with the proper psi that you can't use. I'll check the schematics of the CJ and determine the best by-pass and secondary connection. Primary being for the gear. Thanks for the info, glad someone else tried it and it works. Jim >>> BitterlichMG@cherrypoint.usmc.mil 04/21/06 2:30 PM >>> I suggested the same thing about a year ago Tim. It is not hard to do. However remember that the VOLUME in the emergency air tank is much smaller and you are not going to get as many starting attempts as you would with the main bottle. For the YAK-52.... don't worry about flying it back with the gear down. Once you open your little "tie it all together valve", just leave it open and it will end up pressurizing BOTH bottles again after start. After everything is full, just close off your little valve and you are perfectly good to go again. For the YAK-50, you can close off the new little valve immediately. Your emergency air bottle ALWAYS charges off the engine compressor. Which means in your case Tim, all you need to do is to put a by-pass around the existing check valve and you will accomplish what you are talking about. That check valve is on your firewall right near the pop-off valve. Mark Bitterlich N50YK -----Original Message----- From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Tim Gagnon Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 11:15 AM Subject: Yak-List: Re: Air.....in an emergency. --> Yak-List message posted by: "Tim Gagnon" <NiftyYak50@msn.com> [quote="JBernier(at)dart.org"]Before we off the topic of air start. Does anyone know of a reason not to use the emergency air bottle as supplemental air for starting? If the plane won't start on "the ground" it would seem reasonable to use the air on the right side to support a start. Should be a simple tie in direct to the start solenoid valve through an isolation valve. Might be able to use that little red valve on my right side. I've never used it for anything to this point. After start you could always leave the gear down until a positive fill is observed. Just a thought. Jim B > >> dabear@damned.org 04/21/06 9:46 AM >>> > However, before I buy that the air distributor is the issue. I'd like to see an engine that refuses to start on N2 get the airstart distributor adjusted so that it will. Until then, it is all theory. DaBear A. Dennis Savarese wrote: > Usually if you have less than 20 atmospheres in the tank, the blades > won't turn. There are some engines that will start on pure Nitrogen > and some, like mine, that absolutely says, "ain't no way I'M going to > start on that stuff". Recently someone posted the best explanation > I've read on the subject which was related to the timing of the > airstart distributor. > Dennis > > > --- Jim, I suspect you will be getting an email concering this very soon..... Tim It will not be me. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=29865#29865


    Message 21


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:04:18 PM PST US
    From: Bitterlich GS11 Mark G <BitterlichMG@cherrypoint.usmc.mil>
    Subject: Tool Needed for CJ6a
    Michael, Doug Sapp sells the complete set of tools for prop removal, but be careful.... if you merely want to remove the blades, they UNSCREW out of the hub after just loosening up a bolt/nut. That big ole spanner kind of wrench is for taking the hub apart... you do NOT want to do that, even though at first glance it appears that this is the way to remove the blades. Repeat.. the blades UNSCREW from the hub. There are marks on the blade and the hub for pitch alignment as well... be sure you know where they are and where they are set so that you can put things back exactly as they came apart. Mark N50YK -----Original Message----- From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of mgdimarco Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 11:31 PM Subject: Yak-List: Tool Needed for CJ6a --> Yak-List message posted by: "mgdimarco" <mgdimarco@yahoo.com> Anyone got a line on a spanner wrench for prop removal? For that matter, how about an entire tool kit for the CJ or Yak? Thanks -------- Michael Di Marco China Blue 407-348-4798 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=29784#29784


    Message 22


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:31:29 PM PST US
    From: Bitterlich GS11 Mark G <BitterlichMG@cherrypoint.usmc.mil>
    Subject: Re: Air.....in an emergency.
    It works perfectly. It is very easy to do. Brian Lloyd COULD have told you exactly how to do it I am sure. Try looking up his personal email address and writing. He would be glad to help I am sure. Mark Bitterlich N50YK -----Original Message----- From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Jim Bernier Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 3:54 PM Subject: RE: Yak-List: Re: Air.....in an emergency. --> Yak-List message posted by: "Jim Bernier" <JBernier@dart.org> Mark, Understood. I would assume that this alternative would be used off home field, after an airshow. The engine should have all cylinders clean and ready to fire. It wouldn't take much to start. and would be cheaper then carrying air around. Better then hand propping and you can never forget it in the hanger. It would seem a shame to have air aboard with the proper psi that you can't use. I'll check the schematics of the CJ and determine the best by-pass and secondary connection. Primary being for the gear. Thanks for the info, glad someone else tried it and it works. Jim >>> BitterlichMG@cherrypoint.usmc.mil 04/21/06 2:30 PM >>> I suggested the same thing about a year ago Tim. It is not hard to do. However remember that the VOLUME in the emergency air tank is much smaller and you are not going to get as many starting attempts as you would with the main bottle. For the YAK-52.... don't worry about flying it back with the gear down. Once you open your little "tie it all together valve", just leave it open and it will end up pressurizing BOTH bottles again after start. After everything is full, just close off your little valve and you are perfectly good to go again. For the YAK-50, you can close off the new little valve immediately. Your emergency air bottle ALWAYS charges off the engine compressor. Which means in your case Tim, all you need to do is to put a by-pass around the existing check valve and you will accomplish what you are talking about. That check valve is on your firewall right near the pop-off valve. Mark Bitterlich N50YK -----Original Message----- From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Tim Gagnon Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 11:15 AM Subject: Yak-List: Re: Air.....in an emergency. --> Yak-List message posted by: "Tim Gagnon" <NiftyYak50@msn.com> [quote="JBernier(at)dart.org"]Before we off the topic of air start. Does anyone know of a reason not to use the emergency air bottle as supplemental air for starting? If the plane won't start on "the ground" it would seem reasonable to use the air on the right side to support a start. Should be a simple tie in direct to the start solenoid valve through an isolation valve. Might be able to use that little red valve on my right side. I've never used it for anything to this point. After start you could always leave the gear down until a positive fill is observed. Just a thought. Jim B > >> dabear@damned.org 04/21/06 9:46 AM >>> > However, before I buy that the air distributor is the issue. I'd like to see an engine that refuses to start on N2 get the airstart distributor adjusted so that it will. Until then, it is all theory. DaBear A. Dennis Savarese wrote: > Usually if you have less than 20 atmospheres in the tank, the blades > won't turn. There are some engines that will start on pure Nitrogen > and some, like mine, that absolutely says, "ain't no way I'M going to > start on that stuff". Recently someone posted the best explanation > I've read on the subject which was related to the timing of the > airstart distributor. > Dennis > > > --- Jim, I suspect you will be getting an email concering this very soon..... Tim It will not be me. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=29865#29865


    Message 23


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:04:38 PM PST US
    From: Bitterlich GS11 Mark G <BitterlichMG@cherrypoint.usmc.mil>
    Subject:
    I concur with Smash, I thought it was constructive too... and Smash, I took nothing personally.. and further, it did not really degenerate into something that did not make sense. We were debating from two different points of view, that is all. And... I still have just as much respect for you AND your perspective as I did before. Anyway, it's a done deal. That said excuse me, I have something else to add. I consider many on this list to be personal friends, and I would consider it a great loss to lose my friendship with any one of you. But here's the deal. Certain member(s) of this list have already managed to drive one person off... that being the guy who helped start the whole thing to begin with. THAT was reprehensible! His knowledge and ability with YAK and CJ aircraft will not be easily replaced. NO ONE likes to be told off in public. When I or anyone else is involved with a discussion that bothers you, then HEY maybe it is about time for you to read the instruction manual that came with your email program and figure out how to send a message directly to the person you are upset with, instead of trying to see if you can get a gang of like-minded readers to slay your target in public. Doing that is just dirty pool. I NEVER RECEIVED ONE PERSONAL MESSAGE FROM ANY OF YOU CONCERNING THIS TOPIC OF DISCUSSION. Shame on every one of you that has the courage to complain on a list, but not the decency to write a private message. Personally, I got sick and tired of hearing all the nonsense about ACM/BCM WEEKS AGO! If you are in the military and do ACM for a living GREAT! Lucky you. If you feel others should not even try it because it is too dangerous, SHUT YOUR MOUTH, what others do is none of your darn business, and don't try to imply that what I do in my airplane can impact your airplanes value, so therefore it IS your business. Nice try. I'll still do whatever I want to do in MY AIRPLANE, and if that makes others upset. Tough. If that lowers your airplanes value.... tough.... Suck it up, or sell it and buy something else. By the way, I currently do not even DO much ACM in my YAK-50, but when I want to, I will. End of discussion. If the RPA won't sponsor ACM training, fine... I could care less. That said, I take exception to members of the RPA using this list as their public announcement page. If people have the right to come on this list and tell me to cease and desist, then I have the same right...... You RPA folks have your own site, start using it to discuss your RPA issues. Personally, I joined this list because I had something to offer others based on my 700 hours or more of flying my YAK-50, and also working with 52,s Sukhoi 26's, 31,s etc. I think the technical articles I have written prove that. I have been fortunate enough to hang around with people that know these aircraft and have done my best to pass every mistake I have made and every tidbit I have learned to others that look for that knowledge the same as I do. Bottom line, the people complaining are right.... Gary Gabbard, your comments hit home. There's nothing a ham radio operator hates more than to be referred to as a CB radio freak, much less "a child". I will look forward to reading more from you that contributes toward what this site was created for. In fact, I will look forward to reading ANYTHING from you that has contributed towards what this site was created for. Thus I will now HAPPILY limit ALL future submissions to this list to what it was created for...... Just be darn sure if it applies to me... it damn well applies to you too. Let's see how long it lasts... personally my guess is less than 24 hours. Mark Bitterlich YAK-50 Driver -----Original Message----- From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Sarah Tobin Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 11:32 PM Subject: Yak-List: Re: Russians vs. Smash Trust me I'm done. Sorry, thought it was a constructive conversation at first. Too bad it degenerated into something that doesn't even make sense anymore. Smash


    Message 24


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:13:23 PM PST US
    From: "John W. Hilterman Jr." <johnhilterman1@cox.net>
    Subject:
    Well said dude. _____ From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bitterlich GS11 Mark G Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 4:03 PM Subject: Yak-List: I concur with Smash, I thought it was constructive too... and Smash, I took nothing personally.. and further, it did not really degenerate into something that did not make sense. We were debating from two different points of view, that is all. And... I still have just as much respect for you AND your perspective as I did before. Anyway, it's a done deal. That said excuse me, I have something else to add. I consider many on this list to be personal friends, and I would consider it a great loss to lose my friendship with any one of you. But here's the deal. Certain member(s) of this list have already managed to drive one person off... that being the guy who helped start the whole thing to begin with. THAT was reprehensible! His knowledge and ability with YAK and CJ aircraft will not be easily replaced. NO ONE likes to be told off in public. When I or anyone else is involved with a discussion that bothers you, then HEY maybe it is about time for you to read the instruction manual that came with your email program and figure out how to send a message directly to the person you are upset with, instead of trying to see if you can get a gang of like-minded readers to slay your target in public. Doing that is just dirty pool. I NEVER RECEIVED ONE PERSONAL MESSAGE FROM ANY OF YOU CONCERNING THIS TOPIC OF DISCUSSION. Shame on every one of you that has the courage to complain on a list, but not the decency to write a private message. Personally, I got sick and tired of hearing all the nonsense about ACM/BCM WEEKS AGO! If you are in the military and do ACM for a living GREAT! Lucky you. If you feel others should not even try it because it is too dangerous, SHUT YOUR MOUTH, what others do is none of your darn business, and don't try to imply that what I do in my airplane can impact your airplanes value, so therefore it IS your business. Nice try. I'll still do whatever I want to do in MY AIRPLANE, and if that makes others upset. Tough. If that lowers your airplanes value.... tough.... Suck it up, or sell it and buy something else. By the way, I currently do not even DO much ACM in my YAK-50, but when I want to, I will. End of discussion. If the RPA won't sponsor ACM training, fine... I could care less. That said, I take exception to members of the RPA using this list as their public announcement page. If people have the right to come on this list and tell me to cease and desist, then I have the same right...... You RPA folks have your own site, start using it to discuss your RPA issues. Personally, I joined this list because I had something to offer others based on my 700 hours or more of flying my YAK-50, and also working with 52,s Sukhoi 26's, 31,s etc. I think the technical articles I have written prove that. I have been fortunate enough to hang around with people that know these aircraft and have done my best to pass every mistake I have made and every tidbit I have learned to others that look for that knowledge the same as I do. Bottom line, the people complaining are right.... Gary Gabbard, your comments hit home. There's nothing a ham radio operator hates more than to be referred to as a CB radio freak, much less "a child". I will look forward to reading more from you that contributes toward what this site was created for. In fact, I will look forward to reading ANYTHING from you that has contributed towards what this site was created for. Thus I will now HAPPILY limit ALL future submissions to this list to what it was created for...... Just be darn sure if it applies to me... it damn well applies to you too. Let's see how long it lasts... personally my guess is less than 24 hours. Mark Bitterlich YAK-50 Driver -----Original Message----- From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Sarah Tobin Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 11:32 PM Subject: Yak-List: Re: Russians vs. Smash Trust me I'm done. Sorry, thought it was a constructive conversation at first. Too bad it degenerated into something that doesn't even make sense anymore. Smash


    Message 25


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:27:00 PM PST US
    From: "Ben Marsh" <ben@designselect.net>
    Subject:
    Where's Rodney King when we need him? Marsh _____ From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of John W. Hilterman Jr. Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 2:12 PM Subject: RE: Yak-List: Well said dude. _____ From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bitterlich GS11 Mark G Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 4:03 PM Subject: Yak-List: I concur with Smash, I thought it was constructive too... and Smash, I took nothing personally.. and further, it did not really degenerate into something that did not make sense. We were debating from two different points of view, that is all. And... I still have just as much respect for you AND your perspective as I did before. Anyway, it's a done deal. That said excuse me, I have something else to add. I consider many on this list to be personal friends, and I would consider it a great loss to lose my friendship with any one of you. But here's the deal. Certain member(s) of this list have already managed to drive one person off... that being the guy who helped start the whole thing to begin with. THAT was reprehensible! His knowledge and ability with YAK and CJ aircraft will not be easily replaced. NO ONE likes to be told off in public. When I or anyone else is involved with a discussion that bothers you, then HEY maybe it is about time for you to read the instruction manual that came with your email program and figure out how to send a message directly to the person you are upset with, instead of trying to see if you can get a gang of like-minded readers to slay your target in public. Doing that is just dirty pool. I NEVER RECEIVED ONE PERSONAL MESSAGE FROM ANY OF YOU CONCERNING THIS TOPIC OF DISCUSSION. Shame on every one of you that has the courage to complain on a list, but not the decency to write a private message. Personally, I got sick and tired of hearing all the nonsense about ACM/BCM WEEKS AGO! If you are in the military and do ACM for a living GREAT! Lucky you. If you feel others should not even try it because it is too dangerous, SHUT YOUR MOUTH, what others do is none of your darn business, and don't try to imply that what I do in my airplane can impact your airplanes value, so therefore it IS your business. Nice try. I'll still do whatever I want to do in MY AIRPLANE, and if that makes others upset. Tough. If that lowers your airplanes value.... tough.... Suck it up, or sell it and buy something else. By the way, I currently do not even DO much ACM in my YAK-50, but when I want to, I will. End of discussion. If the RPA won't sponsor ACM training, fine... I could care less. That said, I take exception to members of the RPA using this list as their public announcement page. If people have the right to come on this list and tell me to cease and desist, then I have the same right...... You RPA folks have your own site, start using it to discuss your RPA issues. Personally, I joined this list because I had something to offer others based on my 700 hours or more of flying my YAK-50, and also working with 52,s Sukhoi 26's, 31,s etc. I think the technical articles I have written prove that. I have been fortunate enough to hang around with people that know these aircraft and have done my best to pass every mistake I have made and every tidbit I have learned to others that look for that knowledge the same as I do. Bottom line, the people complaining are right.... Gary Gabbard, your comments hit home. There's nothing a ham radio operator hates more than to be referred to as a CB radio freak, much less "a child". I will look forward to reading more from you that contributes toward what this site was created for. In fact, I will look forward to reading ANYTHING from you that has contributed towards what this site was created for. Thus I will now HAPPILY limit ALL future submissions to this list to what it was created for...... Just be darn sure if it applies to me... it damn well applies to you too. Let's see how long it lasts... personally my guess is less than 24 hours. Mark Bitterlich YAK-50 Driver -----Original Message----- From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Sarah Tobin Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 11:32 PM Subject: Yak-List: Re: Russians vs. Smash Trust me I'm done. Sorry, thought it was a constructive conversation at first. Too bad it degenerated into something that doesn't even make sense anymore. Smash


    Message 26


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:42:35 PM PST US
    From: "Francis Butler" <francis_butler@msn.com>
    Subject: E: Yak-List:
    --> Yak-List message posted by: "Francis Butler" <francis_butler@msn.com> Get em Gunny. 700 hours on your 50? When you wear it out, mine is still for sale. Have taken delivery of my new 300L. Freindly reminder for Yak Listers....my Yak 50 is for sale. See link below for details. Will Deliver. Make fair offer and it is yours. http://homepage.mac.com/francisbutler/ DO NOT ARCHIVE >From: Bitterlich GS11 Mark G <BitterlichMG@cherrypoint.usmc.mil> >To: "'yak-list@matronics.com'" <yak-list@matronics.com> >Subject: Yak-List: Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 17:02:43 -0400 > >I concur with Smash, I thought it was constructive too... and Smash, I took >nothing personally.. and further, it did not really degenerate into >something that did not make sense. We were debating from two different >points of view, that is all. And... I still have just as much respect for >you AND your perspective as I did before. Anyway, it's a done deal. > >That said excuse me, I have something else to add. > >I consider many on this list to be personal friends, and I would consider >it >a great loss to lose my friendship with any one of you. But here's the >deal. Certain member(s) of this list have already managed to drive one >person off... that being the guy who helped start the whole thing to begin >with. THAT was reprehensible! His knowledge and ability with YAK and CJ >aircraft will not be easily replaced. > >NO ONE likes to be told off in public. When I or anyone else is involved >with a discussion that bothers you, then HEY maybe it is about time for you >to read the instruction manual that came with your email program and figure >out how to send a message directly to the person you are upset with, >instead >of trying to see if you can get a gang of like-minded readers to slay your >target in public. Doing that is just dirty pool. I NEVER RECEIVED ONE >PERSONAL MESSAGE FROM ANY OF YOU CONCERNING THIS TOPIC OF DISCUSSION. >Shame >on every one of you that has the courage to complain on a list, but not the >decency to write a private message. > >Personally, I got sick and tired of hearing all the nonsense about ACM/BCM >WEEKS AGO! If you are in the military and do ACM for a living GREAT! Lucky >you. If you feel others should not even try it because it is too >dangerous, >SHUT YOUR MOUTH, what others do is none of your darn business, and don't >try >to imply that what I do in my airplane can impact your airplanes value, so >therefore it IS your business. Nice try. I'll still do whatever I want to >do in MY AIRPLANE, and if that makes others upset. Tough. If that lowers >your airplanes value.... tough.... Suck it up, or sell it and buy >something else. By the way, I currently do not even DO much ACM in my >YAK-50, but when I want to, I will. End of discussion. > >If the RPA won't sponsor ACM training, fine... I could care less. That >said, I take exception to members of the RPA using this list as their >public >announcement page. If people have the right to come on this list and tell >me to cease and desist, then I have the same right...... You RPA folks have >your own site, start using it to discuss your RPA issues. > >Personally, I joined this list because I had something to offer others >based >on my 700 hours or more of flying my YAK-50, and also working with 52,s >Sukhoi 26's, 31,s etc. I think the technical articles I have written prove >that. I have been fortunate enough to hang around with people that know >these aircraft and have done my best to pass every mistake I have made and >every tidbit I have learned to others that look for that knowledge the same >as I do. > >Bottom line, the people complaining are right.... Gary Gabbard, your >comments hit home. There's nothing a ham radio operator hates more than to >be referred to as a CB radio freak, much less "a child". I will look >forward to reading more from you that contributes toward what this site was >created for. In fact, I will look forward to reading ANYTHING from you >that >has contributed towards what this site was created for. > >Thus I will now HAPPILY limit ALL future submissions to this list to what >it >was created for...... Just be darn sure if it applies to me... it damn >well applies to you too. Let's see how long it lasts... personally my >guess >is less than 24 hours. > > Mark Bitterlich > YAK-50 Driver > >


    Message 27


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:59:05 PM PST US
    From: "Jerome van der Schaar" <jvds30@hotmail.com>
    Subject: RPM failure
    Hi all, Today my RPM (Russian one) indicator stopped without any particular reason. Does anybody do have a suggestion what could be the reason? I didn't check in the back since I was flying the plane solo. Thanks, Jerome www.yakkes.com


    Message 28


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:09:38 PM PST US
    From: Bitterlich GS11 Mark G <BitterlichMG@cherrypoint.usmc.mil>
    Subject: RPM failure
    Why of course Jerome! Typically any kind of failure with the RPM indicator occurs because of failure to the solder joints in the cannon plug that attaches to the RPM Tach Generator. Usually this causes the RPM indicator to work backwards, or to be grossly inaccurate. If it fails and goes to ZERO... just as if the engine is not running... then it is possible that your tach generator itself sheared the shaft. The Tach Generator is very easy to remove, is on the left side of the M-14 engine, and has a segmented ring that simply unscrews in order to take it off. Same thing with the cannon plug... you can take it apart easily and see if one or more of the wires inside have just fallen off. (Check this at the Tach Gen End) It is UNLIKELY that you have a bad indicator. You did not mention what kind of airplane you are flying, but if it is a two seat model, you can usually just reverse the two indicators if one fails and the other one works.. but regardless.. the indicators rarely fail. 99 times out of 100, it is either the wiring on the Tach Generator cannon plug, or the tach generator itself. There is a very good digital replacement tach that simply connects to the engine P leads inside the cockpit if you decide to replace the original design. Let me know if that is the case, and I will send you to the web site. Mark Bitterlich YAK-50 N50YK -----Original Message----- From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Jerome van der Schaar Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 5:54 PM Subject: Yak-List: RPM failure Hi all, Today my RPM (Russian one) indicator stopped without any particular reason. Does anybody do have a suggestion what could be the reason? I didn't check in the back since I was flying the plane solo. Thanks, Jerome <http://www.yakkes.com> www.yakkes.com


    Message 29


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:20:16 PM PST US
    From: "Craig Payne" <cpayne@joimail.com>
    Subject: Hanger Parts Clearance
    1st round of hanger parts clearance: 1 New prop governor for Huosai engine. 1 decent set of CJ "gills" with center section. Ring and standoffs not included. Off-list for inquiries please. Craig Payne


    Message 30


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:32:09 PM PST US
    From: "A. Dennis Savarese" <dsavarese@elmore.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: RPM failure
    Remove the connector on the Tach Generator. Open the connector and you will most likely find a broken wire. Very common. Dennis ----- Original Message ----- From: Jerome van der Schaar To: yak-list@matronics.com Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 4:53 PM Subject: Yak-List: RPM failure Hi all, Today my RPM (Russian one) indicator stopped without any particular reason. Does anybody do have a suggestion what could be the reason? I didn't check in the back since I was flying the plane solo. Thanks, Jerome www.yakkes.com


    Message 31


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:32:09 PM PST US
    Subject: new helmet
    From: "napeone" <napeone@aol.com>
    --> Yak-List message posted by: "napeone" <napeone@aol.com> I purchased a HGU55 dual visor helmet from Flighthelmet.com a few weeks ago. Good used helmet in good condition. I couldn't hear a thing in th Yak with the ear phones that came with it. I then installed the Oregon Aero Hush Kit. Only marginally better. One more try. I sent it off to Headsets, Inc. for them to install their ENC gear. Pure Magic! The best ENC I have ever experienced. Far better than my David Clark's or Telex. I had previously thought the Clark's couldn't be beaten. Very happy now with my new helmet setup. David H. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=29985#29985


    Message 32


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:04:36 PM PST US
    From: "Jerome van der Schaar" <jvds30@hotmail.com>
    Subject: RPM failure
    --> Yak-List message posted by: "Jerome van der Schaar" <jvds30@hotmail.com> Mark & Dennis, thanks a lot for your answer, will try you suggestions today. Regards, Jerome -------Original Message------- From: Bitterlich GS11 Mark G Subject: RE: Yak-List: RPM failure Why of course Jerome! Typically any kind of failure with the RPM indicator occurs because of failure to the solder joints in the cannon plug that attaches to the RPM Tach Generator. Usually this causes the RPM indicator to work backwards, or to be grossly inaccurate. If it fails and goes to ZERO... just as if the engine is not running... then it is possible that your tach generator itself sheared the shaft. The Tach Generator is very easy to remove, is on the left side of the M-14 engine, and has a segmented ring that simply unscrews in order to take it off. Same thing with the cannon plug... you can take it apart easily and see if one or more of the wires inside have just fallen off. (Check this at the Tach Gen End) It is UNLIKELY that you have a bad indicator. You did not mention what kind of airplane you are flying, but if it is a two seat model, you can usually just reverse the two indicators if one fails and the other one works.. but regardless.. the indicators rarely fail. 99 times out of 100, it is either the wiring on the Tach Generator cannon plug, or the tach generator itself. There is a very good digital replacement tach that simply connects to the engine P leads inside the cockpit if you decide to replace the original design. Let me know if that is the case, and I will send you to the web site Mark Bitterlich YAK-50 N50YK -----Original Message----- From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Jerome van der Schaar Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 5:54 PM Subject: Yak-List: RPM failure Hi all, Today my RPM (Russian one) indicator stopped without any particular reason. Does anybody do have a suggestion what could be the reason? I didn't check in the back since I was flying the plane solo. Thanks, Jerome www.yakkes.com




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   yak-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Yak-List.htm
  • Full Archive Search Engine
  •   http://www.matronics.com/search
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/yak-list
  • Browse Yak-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/yak-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contributions

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --