Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 08:27 AM - Re: Aircraft Paint Shops (Tim Gagnon)
2. 09:01 AM - Re: Re: weight bal (ROBERT SCHWARTZ)
3. 10:42 AM - Re: Re: weight bal (Genzlinger, Reade)
4. 10:51 AM - Re: weight bal (Mike Bell)
5. 11:42 AM - Re: Re: weight bal (A. Dennis Savarese)
6. 01:20 PM - Re: Re: Radio Troubleshooting (Mike Beresford)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Aircraft Paint Shops |
--> Yak-List message posted by: "Tim Gagnon" <NiftyYak50@msn.com>
File a complaint with the Better Business Bureau....
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=66940#66940
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Yak-List message posted by: "ROBERT SCHWARTZ" <schwartzcompany@worldnet.att.net>
Gentlemen:
I have looked though the log books of my Yak 52 and I am trying to see if
there is a statement regarding weight and balance . I am assuming that these
aircraft were periodically weighted during military use. In my case from
Romanian air force. Has anyone seen weight and balance information in the
logbooks and if so where?
When weighing the aircraft, to perform correctly, should the load pucks go
between jacks and aircraft (at jack points) or scales under the tires? Hope
to hear some good advice. thanks
bob Schwartz
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=66940#66940
>
>
>
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Gus Fraser has a wonderful W/B calculator done in Excel that I will email
you separately. There is a slight difference in CG wheels up vs. wheels
down. Not much to worry about if you've removed all the excess radio gear,
etc. from the rack behind the rear seat.
Reade
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ROBERT SCHWARTZ [mailto:schwartzcompany@worldnet.att.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 11:59 AM
> To: yak-list@matronics.com
> Subject: Re: Yak-List: Re: weight bal
------
Attachments are virus free!
This message has been scanned for viruses at the originating end by
Nemx Anti-Virus for MS Exchange Server/IMC
http://www.nemx.com/products/antivirus
Message 4
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Yak-List message posted by: "Mike Bell" <yakflyr@comcast.net>
If you have the original Romanian logs there is an actual weighing of the finished
airplane. I doubt anybody over there weighed it again.
--------
Mike Bell
Yak 52
Elk Grove, CA
yakflyr@comcastdotnet
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=66974#66974
Message 5
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Yak-List message posted by: "A. Dennis Savarese" <dsavarese@elmore.rr.com>
Robert,
Please remember, in the Russian log books the Yak 52's CG is stated as a
percent of MAC and can be found in section 2 of the aircraft log book. It
will be something like "19.xx" to "25.xx".
Dennis
----- Original Message -----
From: "ROBERT SCHWARTZ" <schwartzcompany@worldnet.att.net>
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 10:59 AM
Subject: Re: Yak-List: Re: weight bal
> --> Yak-List message posted by: "ROBERT SCHWARTZ"
> <schwartzcompany@worldnet.att.net>
>
> Gentlemen:
>
> I have looked though the log books of my Yak 52 and I am trying to see if
> there is a statement regarding weight and balance . I am assuming that
> these aircraft were periodically weighted during military use. In my case
> from Romanian air force. Has anyone seen weight and balance information in
> the logbooks and if so where?
>
> When weighing the aircraft, to perform correctly, should the load pucks go
> between jacks and aircraft (at jack points) or scales under the tires?
> Hope to hear some good advice. thanks
>
> bob Schwartz
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Read this topic online here:
>>
>> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=66940#66940
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
Message 6
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Radio Troubleshooting |
--> Yak-List message posted by: Mike Beresford <mike_beresford@yahoo.co.uk>
Hi all
No great success with adjusting the pots.
I have an idea that the problem is aerial related. Two
radios have given similar problems, so I'm of the
opinion that the fault is outside the actual radio
unit.
Since the intercom is working, I'm assuming that the
problem is not related to the microphone set-up.
Pushing the radio PTT causes a squeeling noise in the
headset, which can only be eliminated by turning the
left hand (looking back) pot on the Baklan radio right
down. Turning the right hand pot alters the pitch of
the sound. (NB radio pots, not the panel controls) Is
this perhaps some form of feedback through the system?
A previous owner had some VHF equipment fitted that is
no longer in the aircraft, save for an American VHF
antenna. If I make a cable with the correct fittings,
is there any reason that I can't connect this antenna
to the BAKLAN-5? This may help determine if the
Russian aerial system is the cause of the problems.
Blue skies
Mike
--- Rob Rowe <yak-list@robrowe.plus.com> wrote:
> --> Yak-List message posted by: "Rob Rowe"
> <yak-list@robrowe.plus.com>
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> You might try adjusting the two slotted pots on the
> front panel of the Baklan 5 transceiver ... sounds
> like you have a -52 so just pop the tray lid off in
> the rear cockpit to access the avionics bay & you'll
> be able to see them (transceiver is the left most
> box, looking rearward).
>
> They're labelled (in Cyrillic, so nearest chars
> shown) "Cn" & "MOA".
>
> "Cn" is receive audio level control.
>
> "MOA" is transmit audio level control.
>
> Your transmit carrier wave only problem might be
> over or under modulation ... so try adjusting "MOA"
> down as well as up to see if this improves the
> quality.
>
> There are some other headset impedance mismatch
> issues on the receive side that might impact
> intercom longevity, but lets try & get the basics
> sorted first.
>
> I'm off-line for a few days so will catch up with
> you later in the week to see how you've got on.
>
> Cheers, Rob Rowe
>
>
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
>
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=66714#66714
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> browse
> Subscriptions page,
> FAQ,
> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
>
> Web Forums!
>
>
> Admin.
>
>
>
>
>
___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - with free PC-PC calling and photo sharing. http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|