Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 03:02 AM - Re: Re: Best Aerobatic Aircraft (Jan Mevis)
2. 04:46 AM - Re: Re: Best Aerobatic Aircraft (Roger Kemp M.D.)
3. 06:51 AM - Re: Re: Overvoltage (darn), Alternator for the CJ (david stroud)
4. 08:15 AM - Re: Re: Overvoltage (darn), Alternator for the CJ (doug sapp)
5. 08:25 AM - Re: Re: Best Aerobatic Aircraft (Herb Coussons)
6. 09:35 AM - dynon100 (ronald wasson)
7. 09:45 AM - Re: Re: Best Aerobatic Aircraft (Andy Hawes)
8. 09:54 AM - Re: Re: Best Aerobatic Aircraft (Brian Lloyd)
9. 01:12 PM - Re: Best Aerobatic Aircraft (Tim Gagnon)
10. 06:07 PM - CJ-6 panel (matt salkeld)
11. 07:19 PM - Re: Re: Best Aerobatic Aircraft (Roger Kemp M.D.)
12. 07:27 PM - Re: Re: Best Aerobatic Aircraft (Roger Kemp M.D.)
13. 07:35 PM - Re: Re: Best Aerobatic Aircraft (Roger Kemp M.D.)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Best Aerobatic Aircraft |
Question of taste. I find the Pitts S2A with the front cockpit covered a
beautiful airplane. It has earned it's place in history.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-
> server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tim Gagnon
> Sent: zaterdag 23 februari 2008 7:17
> To: yak-list@matronics.com
> Subject: Yak-List: Re: Best Aerobatic Aircraft
>
>
> The Pitts, Extra....just do not look as cool as a Suk or Yak....isnt
> that the important part?
>
>
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=165682#165682
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Best Aerobatic Aircraft |
Now if we are going to get into the flat head bipes, then add the Christian
Eagle too! She is a little less squirrelly to land than the Pitts S1 or S2.
And she looks just as good on the ground as in the air as does the Pitts.
Bottom line is, we love our airplanes and we love flying them. As one of my
hanger mates said last evening as we were closing up the hanger about to
turn out the lights, "can you just walk away from them without looking back
for that one last glimpse?" No! They are our steel mistresses! They come
close to sex!
Doc
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jan Mevis
Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2008 4:58 AM
Subject: RE: Yak-List: Re: Best Aerobatic Aircraft
Question of taste. I find the Pitts S2A with the front cockpit covered a
beautiful airplane. It has earned it's place in history.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-
> server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tim Gagnon
> Sent: zaterdag 23 februari 2008 7:17
> To: yak-list@matronics.com
> Subject: Yak-List: Re: Best Aerobatic Aircraft
>
>
> The Pitts, Extra....just do not look as cool as a Suk or Yak....isnt
> that the important part?
>
>
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=165682#165682
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Overvoltage (darn), Alternator for the CJ |
Craig, who sells the M-14 mounting plate..any idea of cost ? Thanks.
David Stroud Ottawa, Canada
C-FDWS Christavia
Fairchild 51 under construction
----- Original Message -----
From: "Craig Winkelmann, CFI" <capav8r@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 9:59 AM
Subject: Yak-List: Re: Overvoltage (darn), Alternator for the CJ
>
> Elmar:
>
> The B&C alternator and VR will set you back between $900 and $1000. If you install
yourself, then there is no install cost,
otherwise, add about 10 hours or so to install. For the Housai engine, you also
need the M-14 mounting plate with the shaft seal or
you'll be spending another $700 real soon to replace the alternator once it gets
loaded with oil.
>
> Simple solution is to keep generator and put overvoltage protection on it. Thanks
to Brian, Aeroelectric has a unit designed.
Bob at Aeroelectric will be producing some soon!
>
> Craig
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=165556#165556
>
>
> --
>
>
Message 4
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Overvoltage (darn), Alternator for the CJ |
Guys,
I have some on order from China, don't know if I can meet your time line
though as mine are about 60 days away.
Contact me off list if you have an interest.
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 6:51 AM, david stroud <dstroud@storm.ca> wrote:
>
> Craig, who sells the M-14 mounting plate..any idea of cost ? Thanks.
>
> David Stroud Ottawa, Canada
> C-FDWS Christavia
> Fairchild 51 under construction
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Craig Winkelmann, CFI" <capav8r@gmail.com>
> To: <yak-list@matronics.com>
> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 9:59 AM
> Subject: Yak-List: Re: Overvoltage (darn), Alternator for the CJ
>
>
> capav8r@gmail.com>
> >
> > Elmar:
> >
> > The B&C alternator and VR will set you back between $900 and $1000. If
> you install yourself, then there is no install cost,
> otherwise, add about 10 hours or so to install. For the Housai engine,
> you also need the M-14 mounting plate with the shaft seal or
> you'll be spending another $700 real soon to replace the alternator once
> it gets loaded with oil.
> >
> > Simple solution is to keep generator and put overvoltage protection on
> it. Thanks to Brian, Aeroelectric has a unit designed.
> Bob at Aeroelectric will be producing some soon!
> >
> > Craig
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Read this topic online here:
> >
> > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=165556#165556
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
>
>
--
Always Yakin,
Doug Sapp
Phone 509-826-4610
Fax 509-826-3644
Message 5
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Best Aerobatic Aircraft |
Have you been talking to my wife?
She always says she knows when I've been to see my girlfrind because
I'm smiling and smell like her - oil and gas ;)
Herb
On Feb 23, 2008, at 6:43 AM, Roger Kemp M.D. wrote:
> >
>
> Now if we are going to get into the flat head bipes, then add the
> Christian
> Eagle too! She is a little less squirrelly to land than the Pitts S1
> or S2.
> And she looks just as good on the ground as in the air as does the
> Pitts.
> Bottom line is, we love our airplanes and we love flying them. As
> one of my
> hanger mates said last evening as we were closing up the hanger
> about to
> turn out the lights, "can you just walk away from them without
> looking back
> for that one last glimpse?" No! They are our steel mistresses! They
> come
> close to sex!
> Doc
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com
> [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jan Mevis
> Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2008 4:58 AM
> To: yak-list@matronics.com
> Subject: RE: Yak-List: Re: Best Aerobatic Aircraft
>
>
> Question of taste. I find the Pitts S2A with the front cockpit
> covered a
> beautiful airplane. It has earned it's place in history.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-
>> server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tim Gagnon
>> Sent: zaterdag 23 februari 2008 7:17
>> To: yak-list@matronics.com
>> Subject: Yak-List: Re: Best Aerobatic Aircraft
>>
>>
>> The Pitts, Extra....just do not look as cool as a Suk or Yak....isnt
>> that the important part?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Read this topic online here:
>>
>> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=165682#165682
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Message 6
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Has anyone put a dynon 100 in a CJ with a new panel from doug
Message 7
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Best Aerobatic Aircraft |
Nothing looks as cool as this www.radialrocket.com, well, save for my Pitts
S1.
Andy Hawes
www.radialrocketman.com
On 2/23/08 12:16 AM, "Tim Gagnon" <NiftyYak50@fuse.net> wrote:
>
> The Pitts, Extra....just do not look as cool as a Suk or Yak....isnt that the
> important part?
>
>
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=165682#165682
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Message 8
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Best Aerobatic Aircraft |
On Feb 23, 2008, at 4:43 AM, Roger Kemp M.D. wrote:
> >
>
> Now if we are going to get into the flat head bipes, then add the
> Christian
> Eagle too! She is a little less squirrelly to land than the Pitts S1
> or S2.
Do you really think that the Pitts is squirrelly on landing? Quick,
yes, but it didn't feel squirrelly to me. OTOH, I liked my Piper
Clipper too.
> turn out the lights, "can you just walk away from them without
> looking back
> for that one last glimpse?" No! They are our steel mistresses! They
> come
> close to sex!
Sorry Doc but flying is better than sex. I can still make several hops
in one day and each hop lasts an hour. (Well, when I am doing full-on
acro I can't last for an hour but I can still make two or three hops.)
And anyone on this list who tells me that he can have sex several
times per day for an hour at a time, well ... I promise not to laugh
too hard.
--
Brian Lloyd 3191 Western Drive
brian HYPHEN 1927 AT lloyd DOT com Cameron Park, CA 95682
+1.916.367.2131 (voice) +1.270.912.0788 (fax)
I fly because it releases my mind from the tyranny of petty things . . .
Antoine de Saint-Exupry
PGP key ID: 12095C52A32A1B6C
PGP key fingerprint: 3B1D BA11 4913 3254 B6E0 CC09 1209 5C52 A32A 1B6C
Message 9
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Best Aerobatic Aircraft |
> Nothing looks as cool as this www.radialrocket.com, well, save for my Pitts
> S1.
Thats a cute airplane.
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=165810#165810
Message 10
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
On the CJ's belly, not too far from the emergency air bottle drain access,
is a small hinged panel, dzus'd on. When opened theres no access to anythin
g, but on the back of it is another dzus that can be used to hold the panel
open. I'm suspecting it's to deal with exhaust gases and the low pressure
area in the cockpit.... Any thoughts on this?
Matt Salkeld
_________________________________________________________________
Message 11
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Best Aerobatic Aircraft |
Naw, but it is a common language between women of aviators!
Doc Kemp
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Herb Coussons
Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2008 10:23 AM
Subject: Re: Yak-List: Re: Best Aerobatic Aircraft
Have you been talking to my wife?
She always says she knows when I've been to see my girlfrind because
I'm smiling and smell like her - oil and gas ;)
Herb
On Feb 23, 2008, at 6:43 AM, Roger Kemp M.D. wrote:
> >
>
> Now if we are going to get into the flat head bipes, then add the
> Christian
> Eagle too! She is a little less squirrelly to land than the Pitts S1
> or S2.
> And she looks just as good on the ground as in the air as does the
> Pitts.
> Bottom line is, we love our airplanes and we love flying them. As
> one of my
> hanger mates said last evening as we were closing up the hanger
> about to
> turn out the lights, "can you just walk away from them without
> looking back
> for that one last glimpse?" No! They are our steel mistresses! They
> come
> close to sex!
> Doc
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com
> [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jan Mevis
> Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2008 4:58 AM
> To: yak-list@matronics.com
> Subject: RE: Yak-List: Re: Best Aerobatic Aircraft
>
>
> Question of taste. I find the Pitts S2A with the front cockpit
> covered a
> beautiful airplane. It has earned it's place in history.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-
>> server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tim Gagnon
>> Sent: zaterdag 23 februari 2008 7:17
>> To: yak-list@matronics.com
>> Subject: Yak-List: Re: Best Aerobatic Aircraft
>>
>>
>> The Pitts, Extra....just do not look as cool as a Suk or Yak....isnt
>> that the important part?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Read this topic online here:
>>
>> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=165682#165682
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Message 12
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Best Aerobatic Aircraft |
Danged, I was going to add that but decided not to!
Still waiting for the 4 hour Viagra moment!
Doc
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Brian Lloyd
Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2008 11:52 AM
Subject: Re: Yak-List: Re: Best Aerobatic Aircraft
On Feb 23, 2008, at 4:43 AM, Roger Kemp M.D. wrote:
> >
>
> Now if we are going to get into the flat head bipes, then add the
> Christian
> Eagle too! She is a little less squirrelly to land than the Pitts S1
> or S2.
Do you really think that the Pitts is squirrelly on landing? Quick,
yes, but it didn't feel squirrelly to me. OTOH, I liked my Piper
Clipper too.
> turn out the lights, "can you just walk away from them without
> looking back
> for that one last glimpse?" No! They are our steel mistresses! They
> come
> close to sex!
Sorry Doc but flying is better than sex. I can still make several hops
in one day and each hop lasts an hour. (Well, when I am doing full-on
acro I can't last for an hour but I can still make two or three hops.)
And anyone on this list who tells me that he can have sex several
times per day for an hour at a time, well ... I promise not to laugh
too hard.
--
Brian Lloyd 3191 Western Drive
brian HYPHEN 1927 AT lloyd DOT com Cameron Park, CA 95682
+1.916.367.2131 (voice) +1.270.912.0788 (fax)
I fly because it releases my mind from the tyranny of petty things . . .
Antoine de Saint-Exupry
PGP key ID: 12095C52A32A1B6C
PGP key fingerprint: 3B1D BA11 4913 3254 B6E0 CC09 1209 5C52 A32A 1B6C
Message 13
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Best Aerobatic Aircraft |
Needs to fold her feet up and the tail needs to look more like a YAK's.
IMHO
Doc
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tim Gagnon
Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2008 3:08 PM
Subject: Yak-List: Re: Best Aerobatic Aircraft
> Nothing looks as cool as this www.radialrocket.com, well, save for my
Pitts
> S1.
Thats a cute airplane.
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=165810#165810
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|