Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 02:51 AM - Re: radio/transmittors (Andrew Love)
2. 03:22 AM - Re: radio/transmittors (Jan Mevis)
3. 05:28 AM - Re: radio/transmittors (Roger Kemp M.D.)
4. 08:37 AM - Y52 brake cables (Jill Gernetzke)
5. 12:23 PM - Avionics (jbowerman@fastspot.net)
6. 01:04 PM - Re: Avionics (A. Dennis Savarese)
7. 02:04 PM - Re: Avionics (Roger Kemp M.D.)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | radio/transmittors |
Hi Jan,
Very interesting. I have not had a go in one, but the numbers certainly app
ear to stack up to something of astonishing value and performance!Andy Love
Marketing Manager and PilotJAGAir LtdQueenstown P 03 442 317
7 I F 03 4423176 I M 027 JAG BO
OK (524 2665)
From: jan.mevis@informavia.beTo: yak-list@matronics.comSubject: RE: Yak-Lis
t: radio/transmittorsDate: Tue, 13 May 2008 08:25:31 +0200
Some of these service bulletins, specifically about strength, are very impo
rtant. They were issued after some vital accidents (Gomljajev f.i.). I am
on an airfield with three Yak 52=92s, and in my humble opinion, a Yak 52 se
ems to be stronger built than a Yak 50. Although I think that my Yak 50 is
a good one out of the remaining few, I have much more work to keep it flyin
g than my fellow Yak 52 collegues. But if you=92ve ever flown a Yak 50 than
you know it=92s worth all that effort !
Jan Mevis
YK50 RA2005K
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@mat
ronics.com] On Behalf Of Andrew LoveSent: dinsdag 13 mei 2008 7:34To: yak-l
ist@matronics.comSubject: RE: Yak-List: radio/transmittors
hi folks,First msg on this server. Have had some issues with our radio rece
ntly. I encountered issues whereby I couldn't transmit but could still rece
ive. At the airshow we were at, we swapped transmittors with a fellow '52 p
ilot and found the comms were fine, just wondering how much are these trans
mittors, and the radio unit itself, in the US? We have limited sources here
in New Zealand. Can anyone shed any light, or personal opinions of the yak
50. Are the dramas with all these service bulletins really a big pain in t
he butt to get one of these types registered and certified or is it not suc
h a big deal? I understand they eng/airframe life is significantly limited
compared to the '52. Regards,Andy Love Marketing Manager and PilotJAGAir Lt
dQueenstown P 03 442 3177 I F 03
4423176 I M 027 JAG BOOK (524 2665)
From: jonboede@hotmail.comTo: yak-list@matronics.comSubject: Yak-List: oil
at fly-inDate: Sun, 11 May 2008 23:19:13 -0500Anybody have any planning sug
gestions for what oil I should ask the FBO to stock for a fly-in?If I have
10 Yak/CJs coming, how much 50 weight, 60 weight, 25W60, etc. should I sugg
est that they carry?Thanks,Jon et="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navi
gator?Yak-Listtp://forums.matronics.com_blank">http://www.matronics.com/con
tribution
Click here Find singles in your area with Match. http://www.matronics.com
/Navigator?Yak-Listhttp://forums.matronics.comhttp://www.matronics.com/cont
ribution
_________________________________________________________________
Buy, rent, invest property online today.
2Enz%2Freview%2Fhome%2Dbuying%2Dinfo%2Ehtml%3Frsf%3Dmsnnz%5Ftextlink&_t=2
6000&_r=REA_NZ_tagline&_m=EXT
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | radio/transmittors |
Yes, the Yak 50 is an outstanding aircraft. Mine (with a three bladed prop
and M14P) outperforms an Extra 300L (with four-bladed prop) as for climbing
performance. Not for aerobatics of course, since the roll rate is too low.
But it has the looks, the sound and the behaviour of a small fighter. I love
it, although it is very demanding as for maintenance. And it's an absolute
thrill making low passes at more than 200 knots J
Jan
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Love
Sent: dinsdag 13 mei 2008 11:48
Subject: RE: Yak-List: radio/transmittors
Hi Jan,
Very interesting. I have not had a go in one, but the numbers certainly
appear to stack up to something of astonishing value and performance!
Andy Love
Marketing Manager and Pilot
JAGAir Ltd
Queenstown
P 03 442 3177 I F 03 4423176
I M 027 JAG BOOK (524 2665)
_____
From: jan.mevis@informavia.be
Subject: RE: Yak-List: radio/transmittors
Some of these service bulletins, specifically about strength, are very
important. They were issued after some vital accidents (Gomljajev f.i.). I
am on an airfield with three Yak 52's, and in my humble opinion, a Yak 52
seems to be stronger built than a Yak 50. Although I think that my Yak 50 is
a good one out of the remaining few, I have much more work to keep it flying
than my fellow Yak 52 collegues. But if you've ever flown a Yak 50 than you
know it's worth all that effort !
Jan Mevis
YK50 RA2005K
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Love
Sent: dinsdag 13 mei 2008 7:34
Subject: RE: Yak-List: radio/transmittors
hi folks,
First msg on this server. Have had some issues with our radio recently. I
encountered issues whereby I couldn't transmit but could still receive. At
the airshow we were at, we swapped transmittors with a fellow '52 pilot and
found the comms were fine, just wondering how much are these transmittors,
and the radio unit itself, in the US? We have limited sources here in New
Zealand.
Can anyone shed any light, or personal opinions of the yak 50. Are the
dramas with all these service bulletins really a big pain in the butt to get
one of these types registered and certified or is it not such a big deal? I
understand they eng/airframe life is significantly limited compared to the
'52.
Regards,
Andy Love
Marketing Manager and Pilot
JAGAir Ltd
Queenstown
P 03 442 3177 I F 03 4423176
I M 027 JAG BOOK (524 2665)
_____
From: jonboede@hotmail.com
Subject: Yak-List: oil at fly-in
Anybody have any planning suggestions for what oil I should ask the FBO to
stock for a fly-in?
If I have 10 Yak/CJs coming, how much 50 weight, 60 weight, 25W60, etc.
should I suggest that they carry?
Thanks,
Jon
et="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
tp://forums.matronics.com
_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
_____
Click here Find singles in your area with Match.
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
http://forums.matronics.com
http://www.matronics.com/contribution
et=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
p://forums.matronics.com
blank>http://www.matronics.com/contribution
_____
Click here Buy, rent, invest property online today.
nz%2Freview%2Fhome%2Dbuying%2Dinfo%2Ehtml%3Frsf%3Dmsnnz%5Ftextlink&_t=26000&
_r=REA_NZ_tagline&_m=EXT>
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | radio/transmittors |
Once you have flown a 50, you will not want to go back to the family YAK. As
for maintenance, I have not found mine to be anymore labor intensive than my
52. The 52 was zero timed refurbished in Lithuania and the 50 was IRAN'd at
Shakety. With the 50, I have some issues of my own creating though but time
spent with her down is pretty minimal as is the 52. It has half the systems
of a 52.
Doc
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jan Mevis
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 5:20 AM
Subject: RE: Yak-List: radio/transmittors
Yes, the Yak 50 is an outstanding aircraft. Mine (with a three bladed prop
and M14P) outperforms an Extra 300L (with four-bladed prop) as for climbing
performance. Not for aerobatics of course, since the roll rate is too low.
But it has the looks, the sound and the behaviour of a small fighter. I love
it, although it is very demanding as for maintenance. And it's an absolute
thrill making low passes at more than 200 knots J
Jan
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Love
Sent: dinsdag 13 mei 2008 11:48
Subject: RE: Yak-List: radio/transmittors
Hi Jan,
Very interesting. I have not had a go in one, but the numbers certainly
appear to stack up to something of astonishing value and performance!
Andy Love
Marketing Manager and Pilot
JAGAir Ltd
Queenstown
P 03 442 3177 I F 03 4423176
I M 027 JAG BOOK (524 2665)
_____
From: jan.mevis@informavia.be
Subject: RE: Yak-List: radio/transmittors
Some of these service bulletins, specifically about strength, are very
important. They were issued after some vital accidents (Gomljajev f.i.). I
am on an airfield with three Yak 52's, and in my humble opinion, a Yak 52
seems to be stronger built than a Yak 50. Although I think that my Yak 50 is
a good one out of the remaining few, I have much more work to keep it flying
than my fellow Yak 52 collegues. But if you've ever flown a Yak 50 than you
know it's worth all that effort !
Jan Mevis
YK50 RA2005K
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Love
Sent: dinsdag 13 mei 2008 7:34
Subject: RE: Yak-List: radio/transmittors
hi folks,
First msg on this server. Have had some issues with our radio recently. I
encountered issues whereby I couldn't transmit but could still receive. At
the airshow we were at, we swapped transmittors with a fellow '52 pilot and
found the comms were fine, just wondering how much are these transmittors,
and the radio unit itself, in the US? We have limited sources here in New
Zealand.
Can anyone shed any light, or personal opinions of the yak 50. Are the
dramas with all these service bulletins really a big pain in the butt to get
one of these types registered and certified or is it not such a big deal? I
understand they eng/airframe life is significantly limited compared to the
'52.
Regards,
Andy Love
Marketing Manager and Pilot
JAGAir Ltd
Queenstown
P 03 442 3177 I F 03 4423176
I M 027 JAG BOOK (524 2665)
_____
From: jonboede@hotmail.com
Subject: Yak-List: oil at fly-in
Anybody have any planning suggestions for what oil I should ask the FBO to
stock for a fly-in?
If I have 10 Yak/CJs coming, how much 50 weight, 60 weight, 25W60, etc.
should I suggest that they carry?
Thanks,
Jon
et="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
tp://forums.matronics.com
_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
_____
Click here Find singles in your area with Match.
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
http://forums.matronics.com
http://www.matronics.com/contribution
et=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
p://forums.matronics.com
blank>http://www.matronics.com/contribution
_____
Click here Buy, rent, invest property online today.
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
http://forums.matronics.com
http://www.matronics.com/contribution
Message 4
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Y52 brake cables |
I have Yak 52 brake cables in stock.
Jill Gernetzke
M-14P, Incorporated
4905 Flightline Drive
Kingman, AZ 86401 -7417
(928)-681-4400
Fax(928)681-4404
www.m-14p.com
Message 5
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
I have been told by the local avionics guru that my Russian comm radio is
not repairable (more than likely he doesn't know how). What types of
radios can successfully be placed into the Yak52 instrument panel in place
of the Russian one?
Jim
Message 6
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
A very functional radio that will fit well in the original VHF radio control
panel slot (with an adapter plate of course) is the XCom round VHF radio.
It is a 2 1/4" round (57mm) digital flip-flop radio with the capability to
monitor the standby frequency and with a built in VOX key intercom should
you wish to use the capability. Very cost effective.
http://www.xcom760.com/ You will need a voltage converter (28V to 14V) for
this and most other small, compact VHF radios.
Dennis
----- Original Message -----
From: <jbowerman@fastspot.net>
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 2:20 PM
Subject: Yak-List: Avionics
>
> I have been told by the local avionics guru that my Russian comm radio is
> not repairable (more than likely he doesn't know how). What types of
> radios can successfully be placed into the Yak52 instrument panel in place
> of the Russian one?
>
> Jim
>
>
>
Message 7
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
The Becker radio also works. Has a flip flop function with an internal
intercom. Also needs a 24 to 12 V converter.
Doc
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of A. Dennis Savarese
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 3:02 PM
Subject: Re: Yak-List: Avionics
<dsavarese@elmore.rr.com>
A very functional radio that will fit well in the original VHF radio control
panel slot (with an adapter plate of course) is the XCom round VHF radio.
It is a 2 1/4" round (57mm) digital flip-flop radio with the capability to
monitor the standby frequency and with a built in VOX key intercom should
you wish to use the capability. Very cost effective.
http://www.xcom760.com/ You will need a voltage converter (28V to 14V) for
this and most other small, compact VHF radios.
Dennis
----- Original Message -----
From: <jbowerman@fastspot.net>
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 2:20 PM
Subject: Yak-List: Avionics
>
> I have been told by the local avionics guru that my Russian comm radio is
> not repairable (more than likely he doesn't know how). What types of
> radios can successfully be placed into the Yak52 instrument panel in place
> of the Russian one?
>
> Jim
>
>
>
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|