Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 02:12 AM - Intercom not working (Armin Riekert)
2. 03:58 AM - Re: Yakking in Canada?? (fougapilot)
3. 04:20 AM - Re: Intercom not working (A. Dennis Savarese)
4. 04:58 AM - Re: Yakking in Canada?? (skidmk)
5. 06:52 AM - Owensboro, KY Fun Fly - June 20-21 (David McGirt)
6. 07:49 AM - Re: Ordering a JPI FS-450 fuel flow instrument (tjyak50)
7. 08:26 AM - Re: Fuel Costs (Ron Davis)
8. 09:05 AM - Re: Re: Yakking in Canada?? (doug sapp)
9. 09:12 AM - Re: Re: Fuel Costs (Richard Goode)
10. 09:15 AM - Re: Owensboro, KY Fun Fly - June 20-21 (David McGirt)
11. 11:47 AM - Re: Re: Ordering a JPI FS-450 fuel flow instrument (A. Dennis Savarese)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Intercom not working |
Hi,
I'm having problems with my russian intercom in my Yak52.
Since a while, it fails to work for a while, sometimes just for a portion of
a flight, sometimes for several flights in a row , then again working for
months without failure. There is no fading in or out. It quits or comes back
completely. Tryed with different headsets, no help. Switching and changing
volume at the two selector panels no help either. There is nothing hearable,
neither in front nor in the rear.
Found that the VHF doesn't work without the intercom selected on too. No
sidetone then, and also no change in electrical load when pushing the
VHF-ptt. With both switches on, VHF works ok.
The SPU-9 box (intercom) has power and ground, same goes for the acoustic
warning board. As far as I could find associated points in the wiring
diagram, the cables are fine from connector to connector.
Am I missing something simple like a fuse or switch?
Any comments welcome!
Armin
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Yakking in Canada?? |
Royden,
Good to hear progress is being made with the -55 being able to receive hull coverage.
I have had extensive communications with both the people at Marsh and COPA on this
and unfortunately the CJ6 (and to the best of my knowledge the Yak52 also)
is still black listed as far as hull is concerned. Typical insurance BS. They
are under the impression that since it is a foreign Warbird, repairs would be
outrageously expensive. Now we all know this is not the case, but they simply
don't care to do their home work for such a small market (25 some airplanes).
However, there are other benefits to having an airplane Canadian registered. You
see, here in Canada, Experimental Exhibition does not exist. The regulation
under which these airplanes are authorized clearly says "the purpose of this regulation
is to allow the use of foreign ex-military airplanes for recreational
uses". This is true for any eligible airplane from the simple CJ to the complex
Mig29 (if you win the national lottery). So no 300-600nm play area, no letter
to send to the FAA, no "proficiency". Nothing but play time. Heck, if you
really have $$ to burn, you could put the wife in the back seat of that Mig and
fly across the country just to get better sushi...
The only draw back to not being "experimental" is that you are somewhat limited
on the modifications you can bring to the airplane. Basically, any modification
that will change the performances of the airplane needs to be approved by TC.
But even then, the process is rather simple since it is not a truly certified
aviation product.
D
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=184483#184483
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Intercom not working |
Armin,
It sounds like you have done your homework on the problem. All audio,
including the VHF radio and ADF (normally removed) goes through the
amplifier box which as you know is under the glare shield between the two
cockpits mounted on the left side looking at it from the rear cockpit. Most
likely you have a flakey amplifier box. Finding a schematic for it may be
difficult and then even if you were able to troubleshoot the unit down to
the component level, finding a replacement for the faulty component may be
difficult to say the least.
I can find out what the repair costs will be through Termikas and see if
they have one on the shelf that they would swap with you for the repair cost
plus core charge until your unit is returned to them. Let me know if you'd
like me to do this.
Dennis
----- Original Message -----
From: "Armin Riekert" <armin@jarin.de>
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 4:09 AM
Subject: Yak-List: Intercom not working
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm having problems with my russian intercom in my Yak52.
> Since a while, it fails to work for a while, sometimes just for a portion
> of
> a flight, sometimes for several flights in a row , then again working for
> months without failure. There is no fading in or out. It quits or comes
> back
> completely. Tryed with different headsets, no help. Switching and changing
> volume at the two selector panels no help either. There is nothing
> hearable,
> neither in front nor in the rear.
> Found that the VHF doesn't work without the intercom selected on too. No
> sidetone then, and also no change in electrical load when pushing the
> VHF-ptt. With both switches on, VHF works ok.
> The SPU-9 box (intercom) has power and ground, same goes for the acoustic
> warning board. As far as I could find associated points in the wiring
> diagram, the cables are fine from connector to connector.
> Am I missing something simple like a fuse or switch?
> Any comments welcome!
>
> Armin
>
>
>
Message 4
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Yakking in Canada?? |
Hey, glad to hear you've got insurance on your Yak 55M.
Curious though, WTF! , over. 1 of these aircraft on the Canadian Registry, same
class as Chang's and other yaks, and we cannot get insurance.
What kind of premiums are you paying? (If you don't mind me asking). How did you
get the insurance? (I really would like hull insurance on my ship)
thanks
Mike
--------
Mike "Skidmk" Bourget
Ottawa, Ontario
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=184488#184488
Message 5
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Owensboro, KY Fun Fly - June 20-21 |
FYI ALL ( Will add to the website as well )
Dr. Cannon is having his 2nd annual fun fly-in June 20-21 at Owensboro, KY
(KOWB). We had a great time last year, and he's "kicking it up a notch" this
year. Plans are for arrival Fri. with hamburger cook out at the hanger. Sat.
fly all day, then a shrimp boil (or possibly catfish fry) along with a
Bluegrass band from Nashville (maybe a cameo appearance by Bill (Strings)
Walker. The new airport manager is excited about the fly-in, and is having
an airport appreciation day in conjunction. We will get fuel discounts.
The hotel of choice is the holiday inn express 270-685-2433, and mention the
fly-in. Doc does things right so you won't be disappointed. Contact # for
Dr. Cannon is 270-316-9014. Please pass this along to any warbird guys, all
are welcome.
Message 6
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Ordering a JPI FS-450 fuel flow instrument |
Dennis:
JPI has had a note about the M14 and the 231 transducer on their website for a
few years actually. It is just hard to find.
The 231 transducer is the required transducer no matter what any retailer tells
you.
I have been running this transducer and fuel flow unit in my 50 for 3 years and
they are a fantastic unit.
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=184511#184511
Message 7
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
11 USD per gallon = 440 USD per barrel. The spot price for crude is $130
. Where does the rest go in the U.K.?
From: richard.goode@russianaeros.comTo: yak-list@matronics.comSubject: Re:
Yak-List: Fuel CostsDate: Thu, 22 May 2008 10:04:30 +0100
100LL is already US$11 per US Gallon-not Imperial -in many parts of the UK!
!
Richard
Richard Goode AerobaticsRhodds FarmLyonshallHerefordHR5 3LWUnited Kingdom
Tel: +44 (0) 1544 340120Fax: +44 (0) 1544 340129www.russianaeros.com
----- Original Message -----
From: fish@aviation-tech.com
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 3:40 AM
Subject: Re: Yak-List: Fuel Costs
h.com>Group,I agree fuel prices are probably here to stay and if wewould li
ke to continue flying, we will need to explore othermethods. Some ideas wou
ld be a flying club or fractionalownership. (Berry, yes I like your idea, c
urrently I can notafford the buy in)Using Mike's breakdown, flying 25 hrs p
er year (2.08 hrs amonth). Lets assume there are 12 hours of daylight flyin
gper day (year round average). The aircraft is parked for 350Hrs of day fly
ing per month, where the aircraft is availablefor someone else to fly. A mo
re realestic figure would be to say there are 4 weekendsin a month (24 day
hrs X 4 weekends= 96 flying hrs availableper month). So with 4 partners i
n an aircraft, that leavesone weekend a month for each to fly the aircraft.
Weekendscould be drawn by lotto(aircraft avail wed - tue), givingeveryone
an even chance of getting the aircraft on a weekendthey want. If you did no
t get the weekend you want, youcould then attempt to trade with the others.
This would drop the cost for the individual, and poss allowmore then 2 flig
ht hrs per month. Increasing the utilizationfactor of the aircraft, and dro
pping cost per flight hour.With a club, you could add aditional aircraft (c
rosscountry, STOL, instrument trainer, Multi Eng, Jet, Ect),adding addition
al value to being a member.Anyone want to purchase a 1/4 to 1/2 shares of a
Yak-52?have aircraft (Cessna, Piper, Twin, Jet, Ect) to include ina club?
Fly SafeJohn FischerYak-52, N213YABT-13, ProjectL-5, projectPT-19, Project-
---- Original Message Follows -----From: "CJcanuck" <m_kirk69@hotmail.com>T
o: yak-list@matronics.comSubject: Yak-List: Re: Fuel CostsDate: Wed, 21 May
@hotmail.com>> > Being Canadian I will refrain from commenting on the> poli
tical scene in the United States (unless someone> wishes to discuss NAFTA)
but I do have a few thoughts on> fuel prices.> > Do I think the current pri
ces are here to stay? Yes, I> do. However, both Europe, Canada and the An
tipodians have> been putting up with USD5.00+ per gallon for many years> an
d both have active, if not as prolific, GA communities.> > I see parallel's
with the energy crisis of '79. The daily> consumption rate for the United
States has only recently> matched the daily consumption rate of those days
(see> Energy Information Agency info for detail), and that's> with a much
larger population. The rationalization of> daily oil use (namely, cars) ha
d a tremendous effect back> then and I feel it needs to be revisited. Now,
if the> current prices drive all the H2's and sparklingly clean> F350's of
f the road then I'm all for it. Many of my> neighbours have large ski boat
s with 350HP+ motors that> they go fishing with for Lord's sake.. what are
they> fishing, submarines??> > I rationalize my CJ this way:> > My car (Toy
ota Matrix) driven around 35,000km> (22,000miles) per year = ~800 gallons
. (~30miles per> gallon) 25hours of CJ @14gal per hour = 350gallons.> Tot
al = 1150gallons> > vs> > Toyota 4-Runner (common larger vehicle I see) d
riven same> distance = ~1300gallons (~17miles per gallon)> > vs> > Hummer
H2 (lots on the road in Anchorage) for same> distance = ~2000gallons (~1
1gallons per mile)> > Simply put America, park those ridiculously big cars
(H2's> , F350's), buy a Ford Focus/Honda Civic/Motorbike for your> daily co
mmute (or better yet, take mass transit) and put> the oil where it's needed
most, in the tanks of our> CJ's/Yak's!!!> > Just my 2 (CDN) cents worth.>
> Mike> > > > > Read this topic online here:> > http://forums.matronics.com
/viewtopic.php?p=184280#184280> > > > > > > > ====> > > p;
Navigator Photoshare, and href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-Li
st">http://www.matronicsnbsp; via the Web href="http://forum
===============nbsp; generous bsp;
href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.ma
tronics.com/c=================-----------
------------------------------------------------------------------This mess
age has been scanned for viruses anddangerous content by the http://www.inv
ictawiz.comMailScanner, and is believed to be clean.-----------------------
------------------------------------------------------
_________________________________________________________________
Keep your kids safer online with Windows Live Family Safety.
http://www.windowslive.com/family_safety/overview.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_
Refresh_family_safety_052008
Message 8
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Yakking in Canada?? |
Guys,
During the "early days" almost every one of US. warbird insurers contacted
me (and I assume other resellers also) about parts availability, most
requested a copy of my inventory on hand. I was told that without the
inventory on hand (in the US), they weren't comfortable offering hull
insurance. Evidently they were satisfied with the level of existing parts
inventories because we seem to have a good supply of companies offering the
service. If the folks at Marsh and COPA are willing to spend a bit of time
and look into the parts availability both in the US and Canada, they will be
pleasantly surprised at the level of "parts on hand" which are maintained by
the various Yak and CJ parts houses. New conduits of parts are continually
being opened up between ourselves and the manufacturers in China and
Russia. Just last week we received two aft fuselage assemblies from the
factory in China to replace those damaged in two separate accidents, one in
Australia and one in Texas. While this was a long and arduous process the
fact that this was possible at all should reinforce the notion that ALL
parts are available and not just "expendables". If I can be of service to
the Canadian Yak and CJ community with respect to convincing Marsh or COPA
that the parts required to do a major repair really do exist, please do not
fail to have them contact me.
See you all at OSH.
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 3:55 AM, fougapilot <fougapilot@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Royden,
>
> Good to hear progress is being made with the -55 being able to receive hull
> coverage.
>
> I have had extensive communications with both the people at Marsh and COPA
> on this and unfortunately the CJ6 (and to the best of my knowledge the Yak52
> also) is still black listed as far as hull is concerned. Typical insurance
> BS. They are under the impression that since it is a foreign Warbird,
> repairs would be outrageously expensive. Now we all know this is not the
> case, but they simply don't care to do their home work for such a small
> market (25 some airplanes).
>
> However, there are other benefits to having an airplane Canadian
> registered. You see, here in Canada, Experimental Exhibition does not exist.
> The regulation under which these airplanes are authorized clearly says "the
> purpose of this regulation is to allow the use of foreign ex-military
> airplanes for recreational uses". This is true for any eligible airplane
> from the simple CJ to the complex Mig29 (if you win the national lottery).
> So no 300-600nm play area, no letter to send to the FAA, no "proficiency".
> Nothing but play time. Heck, if you really have $$ to burn, you could put
> the wife in the back seat of that Mig and fly across the country just to get
> better sushi...
>
> The only draw back to not being "experimental" is that you are somewhat
> limited on the modifications you can bring to the airplane. Basically, any
> modification that will change the performances of the airplane needs to be
> approved by TC. But even then, the process is rather simple since it is not
> a truly certified aviation product.
>
> D
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=184483#184483
>
>
--
Always Yakin,
Doug Sapp
Phone 509-826-4610
Fax 509-826-3644
Message 9
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
I believe about 65% is in tax.I'm not in the oil business,but I assume
the rest is shipping; refining; transport; retailing etc.
Our automotive fuel is not far behind at 9 US$ per US Gallon!!
Richard
Richard Goode Aerobatics
Rhodds Farm
Lyonshall
Hereford
HR5 3LW
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 (0) 1544 340120
Fax: +44 (0) 1544 340129
www.russianaeros.com
----- Original Message -----
From: Ron Davis
To: yak-list@matronics.com
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 4:24 PM
Subject: RE: Yak-List: Fuel Costs
11 USD per gallon = 440 USD per barrel. The spot price for crude is
$130. Where does the rest go in the U.K.?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
From: richard.goode@russianaeros.com
To: yak-list@matronics.com
Subject: Re: Yak-List: Fuel Costs
Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 10:04:30 +0100
100LL is already US$11 per US Gallon-not Imperial -in many parts of
the UK!!
Richard
Richard Goode Aerobatics
Rhodds Farm
Lyonshall
Hereford
HR5 3LW
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 (0) 1544 340120
Fax: +44 (0) 1544 340129
www.russianaeros.com
----- Original Message -----
From: fish@aviation-tech.com
To: yak-list@matronics.com
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 3:40 AM
Subject: Re: Yak-List: Fuel Costs
<fish@aviation-tech.com>
Group,
I agree fuel prices are probably here to stay and if we
would like to continue flying, we will need to explore other
methods. Some ideas would be a flying club or fractional
ownership. (Berry, yes I like your idea, currently I can not
afford the buy in)
Using Mike's breakdown, flying 25 hrs per year (2.08 hrs a
month). Lets assume there are 12 hours of daylight flying
per day (year round average). The aircraft is parked for 350
Hrs of day flying per month, where the aircraft is available
for someone else to fly.
A more realestic figure would be to say there are 4 weekends
in a month (24 day hrs X 4 weekends= 96 flying hrs available
per month). So with 4 partners in an aircraft, that leaves
one weekend a month for each to fly the aircraft. Weekends
could be drawn by lotto(aircraft avail wed - tue), giving
everyone an even chance of getting the aircraft on a weekend
they want. If you did not get the weekend you want, you
could then attempt to trade with the others.
This would drop the cost for the individual, and poss allow
more then 2 flight hrs per month. Increasing the utilization
factor of the aircraft, and dropping cost per flight hour.
With a club, you could add aditional aircraft (cross
country, STOL, instrument trainer, Multi Eng, Jet, Ect),
adding additional value to being a member.
Anyone want to purchase a 1/4 to 1/2 shares of a Yak-52?
have aircraft (Cessna, Piper, Twin, Jet, Ect) to include in
a club?
Fly Safe
John Fischer
Yak-52, N213YA
BT-13, Project
L-5, project
PT-19, Project
----- Original Message Follows -----
From: "CJcanuck" <m_kirk69@hotmail.com>
To: yak-list@matronics.com
Subject: Yak-List: Re: Fuel Costs
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 18:36:50 -0700
> <m_kirk69@hotmail.com>
>
> Being Canadian I will refrain from commenting on the
> political scene in the United States (unless someone
> wishes to discuss NAFTA) but I do have a few thoughts on
> fuel prices.
>
> Do I think the current prices are here to stay? Yes, I
> do. However, both Europe, Canada and the Antipodians have
> been putting up with USD5.00+ per gallon for many years
> and both have active, if not as prolific, GA communities.
>
> I see parallel's with the energy crisis of '79. The daily
> consumption rate for the United States has only recently
> matched the daily consumption rate of those days (see
> Energy Information Agency info for detail), and that's
> with a much larger population. The rationalization of
> daily oil use (namely, cars) had a tremendous effect back
> then and I feel it needs to be revisited. Now, if the
> current prices drive all the H2's and sparklingly clean
> F350's off the road then I'm all for it. Many of my
> neighbours have large ski boats with 350HP+ motors that
> they go fishing with for Lord's sake.. what are they
> fishing, submarines??
>
> I rationalize my CJ this way:
>
> My car (Toyota Matrix) driven around 35,000km
> (22,000miles) per year = ~800 gallons. (~30miles per
> gallon) 25hours of CJ @14gal per hour = 350gallons.
> Total = 1150gallons
>
> vs
>
> Toyota 4-Runner (common larger vehicle I see) driven same
> distance = ~1300gallons (~17miles per gallon)
>
> vs
>
> Hummer H2 (lots on the road in Anchorage) for same
> distance = ~2000gallons (~11gallons per mile)
>
> Simply put America, park those ridiculously big cars (H2's
> , F350's), buy a Ford Focus/Honda Civic/Motorbike for your
> daily commute (or better yet, take mass transit) and put
> the oil where it's needed most, in the tanks of our
> CJ's/Yak's!!!
>
> Just my 2 (CDN) cents worth.
>
> Mike
>
>
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=184280#184280
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ===
>
>
> p; Navigator Photoshare, and
href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List">http://www.matronics
nbsp; via the Web
href="http://forums.matronics.com">http:==========n
bsp; generous bsp;
href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c
================
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by the http://www.invictawiz.com
MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
et=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
p://forums.matronics.com
blank>http://www.matronics.com/contribution
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
Keep your kids safer online with Windows Live Family Safety. Help
protect your kids.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by http://www.invictawiz.com
and is believed to be clean.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Message 10
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Owensboro, KY Fun Fly - June 20-21 |
My pee brain just remembered that the Tarheel clinic is that same weekend..
Anyway, be at one of them
On 5/23/08 9:47 AM, "David McGirt" <david@mcgirt.net> wrote:
>
> FYI ALL ( Will add to the website as well )
>
> Dr. Cannon is having his 2nd annual fun fly-in June 20-21 at Owensboro, KY
> (KOWB). We had a great time last year, and he's "kicking it up a notch" this
> year. Plans are for arrival Fri. with hamburger cook out at the hanger. Sat.
> fly all day, then a shrimp boil (or possibly catfish fry) along with a
> Bluegrass band from Nashville (maybe a cameo appearance by Bill (Strings)
> Walker. The new airport manager is excited about the fly-in, and is having
> an airport appreciation day in conjunction. We will get fuel discounts.
>
> The hotel of choice is the holiday inn express 270-685-2433, and mention the
> fly-in. Doc does things right so you won't be disappointed. Contact # for
> Dr. Cannon is 270-316-9014. Please pass this along to any warbird guys, all
> are welcome.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Message 11
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Ordering a JPI FS-450 fuel flow instrument |
You're right about finding anything on the JPI web site. Thanks for the
feedback though. Quite frankly, I have seen absolutely no difference in
fuel flow whatsoever with the 201B vs. 231.
Dennis
----- Original Message -----
From: "tjyak50" <tomjohnson@cox.net>
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 9:46 AM
Subject: Yak-List: Re: Ordering a JPI FS-450 fuel flow instrument
>
> Dennis:
> JPI has had a note about the M14 and the 231 transducer on their website
> for a few years actually. It is just hard to find.
>
> The 231 transducer is the required transducer no matter what any retailer
> tells you.
>
> I have been running this transducer and fuel flow unit in my 50 for 3
> years and they are a fantastic unit.
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=184511#184511
>
>
>
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|