Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 07:31 AM - CJ fuel sending unit (keithmckinley)
2. 08:09 AM - Re: CJ fuel sending unit (Roger Kemp M.D.)
3. 09:04 AM - Re: CJ fuel sending unit (Tom Elliott)
4. 09:53 AM - Re: CJ fuel sending unit (Gill Gutierrez)
5. 10:22 AM - Re: HELP! Red Star Member and other flyers in danger of loosing homes (Bitterlich, Mark G CIV Det Cherry Point, MALS-14 64E)
6. 10:55 AM - Re: CJ fuel sending unit (A. Dennis Savarese)
7. 12:52 PM - Re: help! (Jerry Painter)
8. 12:57 PM - Re: CJ fuel sending unit (keithmckinley)
9. 01:43 PM - Re: Re: CJ fuel sending unit (Gill Gutierrez)
10. 02:09 PM - Re: Re: help! (Roger Baker)
11. 02:42 PM - Re: Re: help! (A. Dennis Savarese)
12. 03:31 PM - Re: CJ fuel sending unit (keithmckinley)
13. 07:45 PM - Housai Torque Values (Craig Winkelmann)
14. 08:08 PM - Re: Re: CJ fuel sending unit (cjpilot710@aol.com)
15. 08:20 PM - Re: Re: CJ fuel sending unit (Roger Kemp M.D.)
16. 08:33 PM - Re: CJ fuel sending unit (keithmckinley)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | CJ fuel sending unit |
Is it possible to replace the stock CJ resistance unit with a bendable capacitance
fuel probe that would allow the display of the actual fuel when full vs 60
liters. Has anyone tried this?
--------
Keith McKinley
700 HS
KFIT
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=248900#248900
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | CJ fuel sending unit |
Not to my knowledge...there are a few adaptable probes from boat companies
that are out there that would work.
Doc
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of keithmckinley
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 9:30 AM
Subject: Yak-List: CJ fuel sending unit
Is it possible to replace the stock CJ resistance unit with a bendable
capacitance fuel probe that would allow the display of the actual fuel when
full vs 60 liters. Has anyone tried this?
--------
Keith McKinley
700 HS
KFIT
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=248900#248900
Message 3
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | CJ fuel sending unit |
There are several units available. Try this.
Displaying results 1 - 1 of 1 match (0 seconds)
1. PRINCETON CAPACITANCE FUEL PROBES
PRINCETON CAPACITIVE FUEL PROBES * Easy Push Button Calibration - Simple
push buttons make calibration easy and accurate. No sensitive screw
adjustments to make. Place the probe in tank, ...
http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/inpages/princefuelprobes.php - 3.8kb
Tom Elliott
CJ-6A NX63727
702-595-2680
Result page: 1
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Roger Kemp M.D.
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 8:05 AM
Subject: RE: Yak-List: CJ fuel sending unit
--> <viperdoc@mindspring.com>
Not to my knowledge...there are a few adaptable probes from boat companies
that are out there that would work.
Doc
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of keithmckinley
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 9:30 AM
Subject: Yak-List: CJ fuel sending unit
--> <keith.mckinley@townisp.com>
Is it possible to replace the stock CJ resistance unit with a bendable
capacitance fuel probe that would allow the display of the actual fuel when
full vs 60 liters. Has anyone tried this?
--------
Keith McKinley
700 HS
KFIT
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=248900#248900
Message 4
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | CJ fuel sending unit |
Guys,
Sender probe location and wing dihedral make a full tank reading impossible
with electronic probes. A new hole in your fuel tank at the outboard most
point would be required.
Gill
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of keithmckinley
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 7:30 AM
Subject: Yak-List: CJ fuel sending unit
Is it possible to replace the stock CJ resistance unit with a bendable
capacitance fuel probe that would allow the display of the actual fuel when
full vs 60 liters. Has anyone tried this?
--------
Keith McKinley
700 HS
KFIT
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=248900#248900
Message 5
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | HELP! Red Star Member and other flyers in danger of loosing |
homes
Is the YAK LIST a proper forum for this subject matter?
Mark Bitterlich
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tom Elliott
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 1:13 AM
Subject: RE: Yak-List: HELP! Red Star Member and other flyers in danger
of loosing homes
They need to contact the General Aviation New (GAN) the original
publisher run the "Living with your airplane" I think that what it is
called group. For some reason having a mind fart can not think of his
name. But have meet him and he is a nice guy. ( may be Dave Sinclair ?)
Tom Elliott
CJ-6A NX63727
702-595-2680
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Barry Hancock
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 2:12 PM
Subject: Yak-List: HELP! Red Star Member and other flyers in danger of
loosing homes
--> <bhancock@worldwidewarbirds.com>
Gang,
I've been asked by a friend and customer to send out this plea for help.
He lives in Driggs, ID on a hangar home in a beautiful development.
They have just completed the home only to run into the City who is
threatening, now, to remove their runway access
privileges....essentially destroying not only the value of their homes,
but also their retirement. If you can help or know anyone that has any
experience dealing with FAA/City/Airport issues and would be interested
in supporting this important fight, please contact Dr.
Dave Enrico at skypilot1@silverstar.com
See a summary article here:
http://www.tetonvalleynews.net/articles/2009/06/17/news/
doc4a32cd4de5d97260583468.txt
The question I have, is why is a project like this even necessary
considering the current econo.....uh, well....never mind.
Barry
Message 6
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: CJ fuel sending unit |
Now THAT'S an excellent answer!
Dennis
----- Original Message -----
From: Gill Gutierrez
To: yak-list@matronics.com
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 11:54 AM
Subject: RE: Yak-List: CJ fuel sending unit
Guys,
Sender probe location and wing dihedral make a full tank reading
impossible
with electronic probes. A new hole in your fuel tank at the outboard
most
point would be required.
Gill
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of
keithmckinley
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 7:30 AM
To: yak-list@matronics.com
Subject: Yak-List: CJ fuel sending unit
<keith.mckinley@townisp.com>
Is it possible to replace the stock CJ resistance unit with a bendable
capacitance fuel probe that would allow the display of the actual fuel
when
full vs 60 liters. Has anyone tried this?
--------
Keith McKinley
700 HS
KFIT
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=248900#248900
Message 7
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Tom and Barry--
Having spent many years in the land development business I can tell you it
is a mud hole not for the faint of heart or weak of wallet. Lots of pigs
therein who like the mud. Finding knowledgeable people is not easy, but as
your friend has probably already figured, he needs a good land use attorney.
The chore is to sort through local development regulations and whatever
conditions may have been attached to the land use permits that allowed
development of the airpark in the first place to see what regulations
apply/ied and what permit limitations may have been imposed that could pop
up and bite. Often these sorts of things are done with a legal mechanism
called a "Conditional Use Permit" or something similar, that often are
approved on the "condition" that they be "compatible" with surrounding land
uses--whatever that means. Of course, "compatibility" is a moving target.
Needless to say, politicians, nosy neighbors and money are a big part of the
equation. The FAA is probably not involved unless federal money has been
used for the airport. I can't figure it out, but airports don't generally
engender a lot of support and enthusiasm from surrounding land owners. Hey!
I know! Maybe if you take them all for a ride in one of your nice CJ's they
ll get the picture! You might even sell a few! And, a little proactive PR
and respectful give and take often works wonders. Among other things, most
of us don't like being pushed around by politicians or big money out for a
killing (the usual inferred bad guy motivation) and a little public
education never hurts. 'Course, we're often seen as spoiled rich kids
trying to take over the sand box, average non-flyers not realizing we're
just a bunch of struggling taxpayers like everyone else. But, if you go to
any meetings you should probably leave your jet at home, Barry.
Dave Sclair is/was the publisher of General Aviation News. He was
apparently involved in some airpark development years ago, lives/d on one
near Tacoma, WA, and publishes/d an occasional section in GAN listing
airparks around the country called "Living with your Plane" or some such.
Good luck.
New Subject:
Hey, y'all! The Arlington Fly-in is coming up soon (July 8-12). Hope some
of you'll drop in for some good clean flyin' fun with a view of lakes,
mountains, Puget Sound and the Islands. Saw Pappy's three toed whatever
parked on the warbird ramp a few years ago (but didn't see you, Jim, wish I
had), so if he can come all the way from FLA surely some of you folks a
little closer by can make the trip. WBA is located on the east side of the
field just north of the airport entrance and administrative offices. Can't
miss it! Free dogs 'n brats every Saturday, plus who knows during the
Fly-in--we ain't no Temperance Association. Come on down!
Jerry Painter, PLS (registered Professional Land Surveyor and Land Use
Planner, ret.), CFI, A&P, airport bum
Wild Blue Aviation
425-876-0865
JP@FlyWBA.com
www.FlyWBA.com
Time: 02:12:49 PM PST US
From: Barry Hancock <bhancock@worldwidewarbirds.com>
Subject: Yak-List: HELP! Red Star Member and other flyers in danger of
loosing
Homes
Gang,
I've been asked by a friend and customer to send out this plea for
Help. He lives in Driggs, ID on a hangar home in a beautiful
Development. They have just completed the home only to run into the
City who is threatening, now, to remove their runway access
Privileges....essentially destroying not only the value of their
Homes, but also their retirement. If you can help or know anyone
That has any experience dealing with FAA/City/Airport issues and
Would be interested in supporting this important fight, please
Contact Dr. Dave Enrico at skypilot1@silverstar.com
See a summary article here:
http://www.tetonvalleynews.net/articles/2009/06/17/news/
Doc4a32cd4de5d97260583468.txt
The question I have, is why is a project like this even necessary
Considering the current econo.....uh, well....never mind.
Barry
Time: 10:14:52 PM PST US
From: "Tom Elliott" <N13472@aol.com>
Subject: RE: Yak-List: HELP! Red Star Member and other flyers in danger of
loosing
Homes
They need to contact the General Aviation New (GAN) the original publisher
Run the "Living with your airplane" I think
That what it is called group. For some reason having a mind fart can not
Think of his name. But have meet him and he is
A nice guy. ( may be Dave Sinclair ?)
Tom Elliott
CJ-6A NX63727
702-595-2680
Message 8
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: CJ fuel sending unit |
gill.g(at)gpimail.com wrote:
> Guys,
>
> Sender probe location and wing dihedral make a full tank reading impossible
> with electronic probes. A new hole in your fuel tank at the outboard most
> point would be required.
>
> Gill
>
> --
I got that part figures out that's why I was wondering if anyone had come up with
some and accomplished some alternate method like using the hole that's already
there at the drain.
--------
Keith McKinley
700 HS
KFIT
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=248991#248991
Message 9
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: CJ fuel sending unit |
The drain has minimal space between the wing surface and the tank plus it is
only 3/8 or 1/4 inch NPT fitting. Electronic sender probes require some
space for sealing the electronics from the fuel. Also the internal baffling
could present probe barriers. Using a probe through a tee fitting in the
fuel supply line may work better if the 1/4 diameter probe did not obstruct
the fuel flow and could be threaded through the baffling. The main issue
here then would be support for the probe tip. I think a 33 inch probe
length is available through my supplier and others.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of keithmckinley
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 12:57 PM
Subject: Yak-List: Re: CJ fuel sending unit
gill.g(at)gpimail.com wrote:
> Guys,
>
> Sender probe location and wing dihedral make a full tank reading
impossible
> with electronic probes. A new hole in your fuel tank at the outboard most
> point would be required.
>
> Gill
>
> --
I got that part figures out that's why I was wondering if anyone had come up
with some and accomplished some alternate method like using the hole that's
already there at the drain.
--------
Keith McKinley
700 HS
KFIT
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=248991#248991
Message 10
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
I think that the issue in Driggs, Idaho is basically with the FAA.
The injunction against the city of Driggs is, as I read it, to prevent
the city taking action on the demands of the FAA to deny access to the
"homes in hangars" and the "through the fence" hangar homes group.
The city of Driggs, it appears, has allowed the "through the fence"
and "homes in hangars" use of the airport in spite of the fact that
this is a publicly funded (taxpayer financed) facility Such funding
is done in the form of cash grants from the FAA. It is the position of
the FAA that private homes on such an airport, or access for private
homes/hangars to such a publicly funded airport that are not available
to the general flying public is a violation of the grant compliance
restrictions that the recipients of such grants agree to in accepting
public money to build/maintain/expand their airport in the first place.
Them folks whut dun dunnit (spent their big bucks on homes and
hangars) probly got their collective tits in the wringer...
metaphorically speaking.
Roger
PS Although I strongly support those grant compliance restrictions,
if these people in Driggs want to talk to someone who got away with a
similar deal, they should talk to Bill Allen. He built multi-million
dollar hangar/homes on land leased from a publicly owned and financed
airport (Gillespie Field KSEE) in San Diego. This did not please the
FAA and they demanded action. However, somehow Allen et.al. weaseled
the deal through and the fancy homes/hangars are still
there
On Jun 18, 2009, at 12:48 PM, Jerry Painter wrote:
> <wild.blue@verizon.net>
>
>
> Tom and Barry--
>
> Having spent many years in the land development business I can tell
> you it
> is a mud hole not for the faint of heart or weak of wallet. Lots of
> pigs
> therein who like the mud. Finding knowledgeable people is not easy,
> but as
> your friend has probably already figured, he needs a good land use
> attorney.
> The chore is to sort through local development regulations and
> whatever
> conditions may have been attached to the land use permits that allowed
> development of the airpark in the first place to see what regulations
> apply/ied and what permit limitations may have been imposed that
> could pop
> up and bite. Often these sorts of things are done with a legal
> mechanism
> called a "Conditional Use Permit" or something similar, that often are
> approved on the "condition" that they be "compatible" with
> surrounding land
> uses--whatever that means. Of course, "compatibility" is a moving
> target.
> Needless to say, politicians, nosy neighbors and money are a big
> part of the
> equation. The FAA is probably not involved unless federal money has
> been
> used for the airport. I can't figure it out, but airports don't
> generally
> engender a lot of support and enthusiasm from surrounding land
> owners. Hey!
> I know! Maybe if you take them all for a ride in one of your nice
> CJ's they
> ll get the picture! You might even sell a few! And, a little
> proactive PR
> and respectful give and take often works wonders. Among other
> things, most
> of us don't like being pushed around by politicians or big money out
> for a
> killing (the usual inferred bad guy motivation) and a little public
> education never hurts. 'Course, we're often seen as spoiled rich kids
> trying to take over the sand box, average non-flyers not realizing
> we're
> just a bunch of struggling taxpayers like everyone else. But, if
> you go to
> any meetings you should probably leave your jet at home, Barry.
>
> Dave Sclair is/was the publisher of General Aviation News. He was
> apparently involved in some airpark development years ago, lives/d
> on one
> near Tacoma, WA, and publishes/d an occasional section in GAN listing
> airparks around the country called "Living with your Plane" or some
> such.
>
> Good luck.
>
> New Subject:
>
> Hey, y'all! The Arlington Fly-in is coming up soon (July 8-12).
> Hope some
> of you'll drop in for some good clean flyin' fun with a view of lakes,
> mountains, Puget Sound and the Islands. Saw Pappy's three toed
> whatever
> parked on the warbird ramp a few years ago (but didn't see you, Jim,
> wish I
> had), so if he can come all the way from FLA surely some of you
> folks a
> little closer by can make the trip. WBA is located on the east side
> of the
> field just north of the airport entrance and administrative
> offices. Can't
> miss it! Free dogs 'n brats every Saturday, plus who knows during the
> Fly-in--we ain't no Temperance Association. Come on down!
>
> Jerry Painter, PLS (registered Professional Land Surveyor and Land Use
> Planner, ret.), CFI, A&P, airport bum
> Wild Blue Aviation
> 425-876-0865
> JP@FlyWBA.com
> www.FlyWBA.com
>
> Time: 02:12:49 PM PST US
> From: Barry Hancock <bhancock@worldwidewarbirds.com>
> Subject: Yak-List: HELP! Red Star Member and other flyers in danger of
> loosing
> Homes
>
>
> Gang,
>
> I've been asked by a friend and customer to send out this plea for
> Help. He lives in Driggs, ID on a hangar home in a beautiful
> Development. They have just completed the home only to run into the
> City who is threatening, now, to remove their runway access
> Privileges....essentially destroying not only the value of their
> Homes, but also their retirement. If you can help or know anyone
> That has any experience dealing with FAA/City/Airport issues and
> Would be interested in supporting this important fight, please
> Contact Dr. Dave Enrico at skypilot1@silverstar.com
>
> See a summary article here:
>
> http://www.tetonvalleynews.net/articles/2009/06/17/news/
> Doc4a32cd4de5d97260583468.txt
>
> The question I have, is why is a project like this even necessary
> Considering the current econo.....uh, well....never mind.
>
> Barry
>
>
> Time: 10:14:52 PM PST US
> From: "Tom Elliott" <N13472@aol.com>
> Subject: RE: Yak-List: HELP! Red Star Member and other flyers in
> danger of
> loosing
> Homes
>
>
> They need to contact the General Aviation New (GAN) the original
> publisher
> Run the "Living with your airplane" I think
> That what it is called group. For some reason having a mind fart can
> not
> Think of his name. But have meet him and he is
> A nice guy. ( may be Dave Sinclair ?)
>
> Tom Elliott
> CJ-6A NX63727
> 702-595-2680
>
>
Message 11
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
As a starting point, it might be beneficial for the interested parties
to read Advisory Circular 150/5190-7 which talks about through-the-fence
operations.
http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/advisory_circular/150-5190-7/150
_5190_7.pdf
Dennis
----- Original Message -----
From: Jerry Painter
To: yak-list@matronics.com
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 2:48 PM
Subject: Yak-List: Re: help!
<wild.blue@verizon.net>
Tom and Barry--
Having spent many years in the land development business I can tell
you it
is a mud hole not for the faint of heart or weak of wallet. Lots of
pigs
therein who like the mud. Finding knowledgeable people is not easy,
but as
your friend has probably already figured, he needs a good land use
attorney.
The chore is to sort through local development regulations and
whatever
conditions may have been attached to the land use permits that allowed
development of the airpark in the first place to see what regulations
apply/ied and what permit limitations may have been imposed that could
pop
up and bite. Often these sorts of things are done with a legal
mechanism
called a "Conditional Use Permit" or something similar, that often are
approved on the "condition" that they be "compatible" with surrounding
land
uses--whatever that means. Of course, "compatibility" is a moving
target.
Needless to say, politicians, nosy neighbors and money are a big part
of the
equation. The FAA is probably not involved unless federal money has
been
used for the airport. I can't figure it out, but airports don't
generally
engender a lot of support and enthusiasm from surrounding land owners.
Hey!
I know! Maybe if you take them all for a ride in one of your nice CJ's
they
ll get the picture! You might even sell a few! And, a little
proactive PR
and respectful give and take often works wonders. Among other things,
most
of us don't like being pushed around by politicians or big money out
for a
killing (the usual inferred bad guy motivation) and a little public
education never hurts. 'Course, we're often seen as spoiled rich kids
trying to take over the sand box, average non-flyers not realizing
we're
just a bunch of struggling taxpayers like everyone else. But, if you
go to
any meetings you should probably leave your jet at home, Barry.
Dave Sclair is/was the publisher of General Aviation News. He was
apparently involved in some airpark development years ago, lives/d on
one
near Tacoma, WA, and publishes/d an occasional section in GAN listing
airparks around the country called "Living with your Plane" or some
such.
Good luck.
New Subject:
Hey, y'all! The Arlington Fly-in is coming up soon (July 8-12). Hope
some
of you'll drop in for some good clean flyin' fun with a view of lakes,
mountains, Puget Sound and the Islands. Saw Pappy's three toed
whatever
parked on the warbird ramp a few years ago (but didn't see you, Jim,
wish I
had), so if he can come all the way from FLA surely some of you folks
a
little closer by can make the trip. WBA is located on the east side
of the
field just north of the airport entrance and administrative offices.
Can't
miss it! Free dogs 'n brats every Saturday, plus who knows during the
Fly-in--we ain't no Temperance Association. Come on down!
Jerry Painter, PLS (registered Professional Land Surveyor and Land Use
Planner, ret.), CFI, A&P, airport bum
Wild Blue Aviation
425-876-0865
JP@FlyWBA.com
www.FlyWBA.com
Time: 02:12:49 PM PST US
From: Barry Hancock <bhancock@worldwidewarbirds.com>
Subject: Yak-List: HELP! Red Star Member and other flyers in danger of
loosing
Homes
Gang,
I've been asked by a friend and customer to send out this plea for
Help. He lives in Driggs, ID on a hangar home in a beautiful
Development. They have just completed the home only to run into the
City who is threatening, now, to remove their runway access
Privileges....essentially destroying not only the value of their
Homes, but also their retirement. If you can help or know anyone
That has any experience dealing with FAA/City/Airport issues and
Would be interested in supporting this important fight, please
Contact Dr. Dave Enrico at skypilot1@silverstar.com
See a summary article here:
http://www.tetonvalleynews.net/articles/2009/06/17/news/
Doc4a32cd4de5d97260583468.txt
The question I have, is why is a project like this even necessary
Considering the current econo.....uh, well....never mind.
Barry
Time: 10:14:52 PM PST US
From: "Tom Elliott" <N13472@aol.com>
Subject: RE: Yak-List: HELP! Red Star Member and other flyers in
danger of
loosing
Homes
They need to contact the General Aviation New (GAN) the original
publisher
Run the "Living with your airplane" I think
That what it is called group. For some reason having a mind fart can
not
Think of his name. But have meet him and he is
A nice guy. ( may be Dave Sinclair ?)
Tom Elliott
CJ-6A NX63727
702-595-2680
Message 12
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: CJ fuel sending unit |
I'm finding that after a year of ownership that there are very few modifications
worth doing on an airplane that's been around a while. Seems that if there
was a better way the Chinese probably would have done it.
The few mods that I have; oil filter, auto spark plug kit, air filter and intake
drain seem like no brainers. Messing with an otherwise decent fuel system is
probably not worth the effort. Time and money probably would be better spent
on a FF system.
Keith
--------
Keith McKinley
700 HS
KFIT
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=249022#249022
Message 13
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Housai Torque Values |
Looking for the torque values for spark plugs and the air start valve/nozzle on
the cylinders.
Thanks,
Craig
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=249050#249050
Message 14
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: CJ fuel sending unit |
In a message dated 6/18/2009 6:32:12 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
keith.mckinley@townisp.com writes:
I'll put in my view on this and other subjects.
I've owned my CJ some 15 years now. Going for the extra fuel is one of
the best things I did to my plane. If you do long XC occasionally you find
it more comfortable having the gas on board for reserve. I flew the
airlines for 34 years, believe me being short on gas is not a comfortable feeling.
Than again "short on gas" is individual perception. I did not enjoy
using the VFR fuel minimums and landing with thirty minutes of fuel. You have
less alternatives and few places to divert to. Now I feel quite
comfortable with an one hour plus reserve after my normal 2 hour legs. BTW you
can
adjust the fuel senders in the tank to read very accurately at the low end
of the scale, which for me, is when you really want to know what's left in
the tank.
Airports,
Been to Allen home at SEE for a party one time while out flying the B-24.
VERY NICE!!! It would be interesting to know what kind of deal was made
for his set up.
We just finished (today) resurfacing our runway here on our airpark
(FD44). Basically we remove the top soil, graded, put on a limestone/clay base,
and re sod the whole runway with a tough hybrid grass used for golf
fairways. In 3 weeks time, she'll be ready for use. The nice thing about this,
we
didn't have to get permission or OKs from anyone. Only fighting was
amongst the different homeowners in the association.
BTW I'm now home for a while. Dropped 11 250lb bombs on 2 missions in the
B-24. Heard the rattle of a 50cal from my waist gun position as I flew
the IP to drop point. Had a P-51C for escort. I discovered that I have
claustrophobia while setting in and working the belly turret. Believe me
gentleman there is nothing like it except the real thing and this is the closest
I'll ever be able to get.
Jim "Pappy" Goolsby
<keith.mckinley@townisp.com>
I'm finding that after a year of ownership that there are very few
modifications worth doing on an airplane that's been around a while. Seems that
if there was a better way the Chinese probably would have done it.
The few mods that I have; oil filter, auto spark plug kit, air filter and
intake drain seem like no brainers. Messing with an otherwise decent fuel
system is probably not worth the effort. Time and money probably would be
better spent on a FF system.
Keith
--------
Keith McKinley
700 HS
KFIT
**************Download the AOL Classifieds Toolbar for local deals at your
fingertips.
(http://toolbar.aol.com/aolclassifieds/download.html?ncid=emlcntusdown00000004)
Message 15
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: CJ fuel sending unit |
.
better spent on a FF system.
Keith
What's a FF system. Agree with all said in your post. Just curious what is a
FF system before the imagination runs wild.
Doc
Message 16
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: CJ fuel sending unit |
Doc,
I shouldn't have said "system"... I was referring to a fuel flow transducer and
display unit
Keith
--------
Keith McKinley
700 HS
KFIT
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=249056#249056
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|