Yak-List Digest Archive

Sat 12/26/09


Total Messages Posted: 2



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 12:12 AM - Re: Re: Reno FSDO (John Fischer)
     2. 10:12 AM - Re: Reno FSDO (barryhancock)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:12:49 AM PST US
    From: John Fischer <fish@aviation-tech.com>
    Subject: Re: Reno FSDO
    Berry, I have received a letter very similar to the one posted for my Yak-52. I have not yet replied to the letter. It may be that my Yak-52 is still registered in Reno. Since it has not flown since brining it home, I have not completed the transfer. But once again, I hope to have it flying by summer. Laterrrrr John Fischer California City, CA At 10:59 AM 12/23/2009, you wrote: ><bhancock@worldwidewarbirds.com> > >Gang, > >What Craig posted was an internal memo...you will not likely be >getting anything in the mail. I have spoken with the investigators >of the Riggs incident (yes, over a year ago) and they told me this >was coming. > >What you can expect is an increased likelihood of a ramp >check. Have your paperwork in order, and know Part 43. This >directive currently applies to the Western Region only (so >far). Frankly, they do not have the manpower to accomplish their >objectives (check the records of every EE aircraft in 2 years), but >needless to say, we are a more prominent target on their radar and >should be prepared accordingly. > >Happy Flying and Merry Christmas! > >Barry > >-------- >Barry Hancock >Worldwide Warbirds, Inc. >www.worldwidewarbirds.com > > >Read this topic online here: > >http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=278719#278719 > >


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:12:04 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Reno FSDO
    From: "barryhancock" <bhancock@worldwidewarbirds.com>
    Fish, Thanks. I re-read the letter and indeed it is addressed to specific individuals. I was aware that this mandate was an internal Western Region action, but that they are sending letters out is the first tangible step. This confirms to me that they realize they don't have the manpower to implement their original plan, and that was to physically inspect (again) every plane. Yes, this letter presents an administrative annoyance, but we should all have these docs. Be SURE that you understand your Ops Limits and what is required....this review does present the opportunity for the proverbial can of worms. Happy Flying, Barry -------- Barry Hancock Worldwide Warbirds, Inc. www.worldwidewarbirds.com Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=278900#278900




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   yak-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Yak-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/yak-list
  • Browse Yak-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/yak-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --