Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 06:55 AM - Re: Digital attitude indicator (keithmckinley)
2. 08:01 AM - Re: Digital attitude indicator (Roger Kemp M.D.)
3. 08:08 AM - Re: gill question on CJ6 (yes I searched the archive) (Roger Kemp M.D.)
4. 01:43 PM - Re: gill question on CJ6 (yes I searched the archive) (skidmk)
5. 10:17 PM - Emailing: PF Fly In 021.jpg (Chris Wise)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Digital attitude indicator |
I believe the dynon D-10a efis will fit as well as a straight attitude indicator
from MGL avionics
--------
Keith McKinley
700HS
KFIT
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=291143#291143
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Digital attitude indicator |
Dynon D 10. You will have to make a back plate that will mount to the
ADI hole the Chinese/Ru ADI comes out of.
Doc
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of
KingCJ6@aol.com
Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2010 7:32 PM
Subject: Yak-List: Digital attitude indicator
About a year ago there was a string discussing a digital attitude
indicator that was a near-exact fit in the CJ=99s existing gyro
panel space. I believe the face was a 4-5=9D square. Anyone have
a brand/model number?
Thanks, Dave
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | gill question on CJ6 (yes I searched the archive) |
Yep, had to replace the 50's gills after a bird strike. The same thing. Just
locked them in the open position and safety wired the inner ring lever. Have
not had time to tweak it because of other time consuming issues with my
office. Will get back to it this spring. They do not move well when the
outer ring is warped.
Even flying in this past cold ass winter once cylinder head temps were up
did not need them.
Doc
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of cjpilot710@aol.com
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 11:53 PM
Subject: Re: Yak-List: gill question on CJ6 (yes I searched the archive)
It is very important that the outer ring is not warped. The stand offs
need to be all the correct length so that the outer ring is not twisted or
bowed. What happens is that the inter ring that moves the vanes is working
against the outer ring. I just replaced my gills vanes and had this very
problem. It turned out that one of the cylinder stand offs, was about 3/8"
short. I sighted from the side and could just make out a slight bow in the
out ring. Once that was fixed, it work smooth as silk.
Jim "Pappy" Goolsby
-----Original Message-----
From: skidmk <skidmk@gmail.com>
Sent: Fri, Mar 19, 2010 8:25 pm
Subject: Yak-List: gill question on CJ6 (yes I searched the archive)
Hi all,
removed the complete gill system of CJ to replace the "weatherstrip". The
vanes were never detached from the center ring, but were removed from the
outer
ring (to enable riviting for weatherstrip) by removing the nut, and then the
long "bolt".
reinstalled today,, and suddenly they are very hard to open and close. The
nuts
were tightened just enough to prevent up and down movement.
any tips? ideas?
thanks
Mike
--------
Mike "Skidmk" Bourget
Ottawa, Ontario
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=290979#290979
===================================
get=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
===================================
tp://forums.matronics.com
===================================
_blank>http://www.matronics.com/contribution
===================================
Message 4
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: gill question on CJ6 (yes I searched the archive) |
another potential gotcha. I was looking though the parts manual for a hint as
to the problem..... 3 of the vanes have shorter bolts than the others... this
may be causing its own set of issues as well.
Back to the hangar tear it apart and go from there.
Mike
--------
Mike "Skidmk" Bourget
Ottawa, Ontario
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=291181#291181
Message 5
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Emailing: PF Fly In 021.jpg |
G'Day All,
Have replaced original prop on our 18T with a GT Propeller.
First impression was the totally different shape than the old V530
First flight onSaturday with new prop produced shorter take off distance
and a surprisingly better climb rate.
Pitch was set to produce 100% at full throttle and on take off roll at
full power went to 103%.
Maybe need a very slight tweak on the angles.
This was with full tanks and 3 big blokes.
Yesterday, Sunday 21st went to fly-in come airshow. 30 min flight along
the coast.
Tailwind there and headwind home but appears to be about 8 to 9 knots
faster at the same settings.
Oh, and by the way, much smoother and a lot less vibration.
Very significant improvement during aero display.
1/2 tanks and 2 POB.
Improved climb and aircraft hung in during manoeuvres and rolls far
better than original Russian prop.
We had a height limitation of 1500 ft due to controlled airspace and
hence could not loop, but feel happy that the prop will deliver the
goods at aeros requiring higher power settings.
Attached photo of inverted during roll may demonstrate the attitude of
increased performance in that the nose does not seem to want to drop
away as much as before.
Rolls at 80/80.
I have been looking at replacing the prop for about a year and looked at
Whirlwind, MT and GT propellers.
Have to say that at this stage I am very pleased with the all round
increase in performance.
Cheers and regards,
Chris.
The message is ready to be sent with the following file or link
attachments:
PF Fly In 021.jpg
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|
