Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 01:31 PM - Experimental Aircraft AD complience discussion (Bitterlich, Mark G CIV Det Cherry Point, MALS-14 64E)
2. 01:36 PM - Experimental Aircraft AD complience discussion (Bitterlich, Mark G CIV Det Cherry Point, MALS-14 64E)
3. 10:00 PM - Re: Yak 55 B/C alternator installation wiring (mikspin)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Experimental Aircraft AD complience discussion |
Gents, this included paragraph is the response I got from the EAA
concerning this issue and is EXCELLENT INFO for all of us to keep on
hand. I consider this the last word on the matter IMHO.
Have a great Memorial Day weekend.
Mark Bitterlich
"Concerning the AD concerns and applicability. I understand the points
made in the March 26, 2003 memorandum from the FAA New England Region's
acting regional counsel, however I believe that information is outdated
and no longer applicable. I contacted EAA who in turn contacted the
Manager, Aircraft Maintenance Division, AFS-300 for the current FAA
national guidance on the AD vs. experimental aircraft applicability
issue. The current FAA national policy per Mr. Ron Wojnar, AFS-304, is:
"Existing regulations do not support enforcement of ADs on TC, PMA, and
TSO components installed on non-TCed aircraft. Some ADs may apply to
FAA approved products installed on non-TCed aircraft, but compliance is
not mandatory because the aircraft is not TCed. However, the rules in
part 43 governing the maintenance, preventive maintenance, rebuilding,
and alteration of these aircraft do not apply. The owner or operator of
a non-TCed aircraft is responsible for its design and maintenance.
The FAA encourages owners and operators of these aircraft to comply
with ADs, but the operator may mitigate safety risks in some other way,
without obtaining alternative methods of compliance from the FAA." With
this guidance in mind I do plan on reviewing AD's issued against the
engine and propeller installed on my aircraft to determine their flight
safety applicability per FAR 91.319(b). I will also make the following
logbook entry to indicate that a flight safety determination has been
made: "I certify that AD Number _________________ has been reviewed on
______________(date)."
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Experimental Aircraft AD complience discussion |
Gents, this included paragraph is the response I got from the EAA
concerning this issue and is EXCELLENT INFO for all of us to keep on
hand. I consider this the last word on the matter IMHO.
Have a great Memorial Day weekend.
Mark Bitterlich
"Concerning the AD concerns and applicability. I understand the points
made in the March 26, 2003 memorandum from the FAA New England Region's
acting regional counsel, however I believe that information is outdated
and no longer applicable. I contacted EAA who in turn contacted the
Manager, Aircraft Maintenance Division, AFS-300 for the current FAA
national guidance on the AD vs. experimental aircraft applicability
issue. The current FAA national policy per Mr. Ron Wojnar, AFS-304, is:
"Existing regulations do not support enforcement of ADs on TC, PMA, and
TSO components installed on non-TCed aircraft. Some ADs may apply to
FAA approved products installed on non-TCed aircraft, but compliance is
not mandatory because the aircraft is not TCed. However, the rules in
part 43 governing the maintenance, preventive maintenance, rebuilding,
and alteration of these aircraft do not apply. The owner or operator of
a non-TCed aircraft is responsible for its design and maintenance.
The FAA encourages owners and operators of these aircraft to comply
with ADs, but the operator may mitigate safety risks in some other way,
without obtaining alternative methods of compliance from the FAA." With
this guidance in mind I do plan on reviewing AD's issued against the
engine and propeller installed on my aircraft to determine their flight
safety applicability per FAR 91.319(b). I will also make the following
logbook entry to indicate that a flight safety determination has been
made: "I certify that AD Number _________________ has been reviewed on
______________(date)."
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Yak 55 B/C alternator installation wiring |
Shawn,
I've done the B+C conversion on my 55M utilizing a great deal of the existing setup
(original gen warning light, etc.) The system is similar to but not the
same as the -52 or -50 systems (it uses the DMR-200 and other components common
to many Yaks).
I have the diagrams that another -55 owner was gracious enough to send me copies
of. I've made some notes on them that might help you to better understand where
to start.
Contact me off list for more info.
Mike Hastings
acromike@gmail.com
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=299235#299235
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|