Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 04:37 AM - Re: Re: FSDO changing operating limitations on pre-moratorium aircra (A. Dennis Savarese)
2. 10:25 AM - Re: Re: FSDO changing operating limitations on pre-moratorium aircra (Bitterlich, Mark G CIV Det Cherry Point, MALS-14 64E)
3. 01:21 PM - Re: Housi pickling procedure (doug sapp)
4. 06:06 PM - Looking for Original Yak Antenna (NebraskaYak)
5. 06:07 PM - Re: CHT probe location. (NebraskaYak)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: FSDO changing operating limitations on pre-moratorium |
aircra
Seems reasonable Pete. Glad you "convinced" them they can not just
arbitrarily rewrite your OL's.
Dennis
----- Original Message -----
From: Pete Fowler
To: yak-list@matronics.com
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 9:51 PM
Subject: Yak-List: Re: FSDO changing operating limitations on
pre-moratorium aircra
So where this has ended up is that the FSDO acknowledges that they
can't add any of 8130s limitations to my operating limitations BUT they
are dead set on adding an arrival/departure route to the first line of
my limitations under the provisions of FAR 91.319 flight over congested
areas:
(c) Unless otherwise authorized by the Administrator in special
operating limitations, no person may operate an aircraft that has an
experimental certificate over a densely populated area or in a congested
airway. The Administrator may issue special operating limitations for
particular aircraft to permit takeoffs and landings to be conducted over
a densely populated area or in a congested airway, in accordance with
terms and conditions specified in the authorization in the interest of
safety in air commerce.
They propose to do this with a (r) revision to my existing
limitations, supposedly being sure that the airworthiness certificate
still retains the original 1991 date (and I'm going to be sure that no
language implies that my operating limitations have been "re-issued"
thus creating the possibility that some future FSDO could say "oh they
were issued in 2010, it's no longer pre-moratorium".
Not sure the point of this but they seem to be within their rights to
do it.
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=301640#301640
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: FSDO changing operating limitations on pre-moratorium |
aircra
I have a suggestion for you based on my recent personal experience with
the FAA over similar issues.
CALL THE EAA AND TALK TO THEIR GOVT. AFFAIRS REPRESENTATIVE.
Do it now. Don't pass go or collect $200. These folks gave me
accurate information, advised me what to put in a letter to the FAA,
gave me contacts to Aviation Lawyers (for free no less) and MUCH more.
Long discussion: Deleted.
Enough said.
Mark Bitterlich
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Pete Fowler
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 10:51 PM
Subject: Yak-List: Re: FSDO changing operating limitations on
pre-moratorium aircra
So where this has ended up is that the FSDO acknowledges that they can't
add any of 8130s limitations to my operating limitations BUT they are
dead set on adding an arrival/departure route to the first line of my
limitations under the provisions of FAR 91.319 flight over congested
areas:
(c) Unless otherwise authorized by the Administrator in special
operating limitations, no person may operate an aircraft that has an
experimental certificate over a densely populated area or in a congested
airway. The Administrator may issue special operating limitations for
particular aircraft to permit takeoffs and landings to be conducted over
a densely populated area or in a congested airway, in accordance with
terms and conditions specified in the authorization in the interest of
safety in air commerce.
They propose to do this with a (r) revision to my existing limitations,
supposedly being sure that the airworthiness certificate still retains
the original 1991 date (and I'm going to be sure that no language
implies that my operating limitations have been "re-issued" thus
creating the possibility that some future FSDO could say "oh they were
issued in 2010, it's no longer pre-moratorium".
Not sure the point of this but they seem to be within their rights to do
it.
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=301640#301640
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Housi pickling procedure |
Dave,
Moisture is the biggest problems with stored engines, rust in the cylinders
,
etc. Coating the cyl walls with oil is a must, rather this is done spray o
r
flooding it should be done if the engine is to be stored for a extended
period of time. Desiccant plugs in the spark plug holes is also a good
idea. They are available from Spruce, but like any desiccant tool it is
useless if not monitored on a regular basis. Exhaust port plugs should be
installed if you have them. Check in your Tech Spec manual, I think I
recall some storage guidelines there.
Good luck,
Doug
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 8:32 PM, <KingCJ6@aol.com> wrote:
> We are acquiring a backup Housi 285 that will be put in storage for some
> time. The engine is currently on an operating a/c , so it can be run
> prior to preserving. Looking for =93best practices=94 recommendations fo
r the
> proper pickling method, as it will be stored horizontally on the shipping
> pallet.
>
>
> Thanks, Dave
>
> *
>
===========
===========
===========
===========
> *
>
>
Message 4
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Looking for Original Yak Antenna |
Anyone know where a guy can get an original Yak 52 radio antenna? Mine is pretty
corroded inside, to the point where it's unfixable. Thanks for any help.
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=301711#301711
Message 5
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: CHT probe location. |
Thanks for all the help guys! Just wanted to confirm it. Cheers.
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=301712#301712
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|