Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 12:17 AM - Looking for baffed out Left mag (DAVID STROUD)
2. 12:44 AM - Re: Banner towing (Warren Hill)
3. 06:05 AM - CJ-6 Manual (acropilot)
4. 07:39 AM - Re: Banner towing (bill wade)
5. 08:39 AM - Re: Banner towing (Bitterlich, Mark G CIV Det Cherry Point, MALS-14 64E)
6. 09:29 AM - Re: Banner towing (Roger Kemp M.D.)
7. 09:44 AM - Housing update, OSH (Elizabeth Rizzo)
8. 01:59 PM - Banner Towing - Part 2 (Jay McIntyre)
9. 03:59 PM - Re: Banner towing (N642K)
10. 07:05 PM - Re: Banner Towing - Part 2 (Tom Elliott)
11. 07:17 PM - Housai's at high density altitude airports (Pete Fowler)
12. 08:29 PM - Re: Banner Towing - Part 2 (alikatz@mbay.net)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Looking for baffed out Left mag |
Lads, my last lead for a baffed out Huosai mag fell through. Anyone have
any leads
to where I can get one? Doesn't need to be serviceable...just need good
rotating parts
and good rotor and cap. No need for wiring. Thanks.
David Stroud Ottawa, Canada
Christavia C-FDWS
Fairchild 51 replica
under construction C-FYXV
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Banner towing |
Bill,
I'll need to go to the hanger to get copies of the original and updated
operating limitations.
=46rom what I recall in speaking with the examiner, operating
limitations come in the form of numbered paragraphs that are cut from
some source document using a word processor and pasted into what they're
working on. My first "edit" of the new operating limitations was
reviewed by a working airline pilot who noticed that several paragraphs
were not only redundant, but actually superseded others. The examiner
agreed and those were deleted. No drama.
Form this thread I get the impression that some parts of the operating
limitations for an experimental exhibition aircraft are mandatory, while
others may be at the discretion of the examiner. Get the right guy and
things make sense.
Warren
On Jul 12, 2010, at 4:13 PM, bill wade wrote:
> Sure Mark got that 300 mile thing removed and no night flying removed
and no instrument fling removed just had to find the proper inspector he
did want to see the airplane and paperwork. Warren just think of the
lousy inspector the previous owner had if the OL was as screwed up as
you said, so what did the inspector add and remove?
> Bill Wade
> Yak 52
>
> From: "Bitterlich, Mark G CIV Det Cherry Point, MALS-14 64E"
<mark.bitterlich@navy.mil>
> To: yak-list@matronics.com
> Sent: Mon, July 12, 2010 11:39:15 AM
> Subject: RE: Yak-List: Banner towing
>
Point, MALS-14 64E" <mark.bitterlich@navy.mil>
>
> Has anyone had any success at all in getting any original Operating
> Limitations removed?
>
> Mark Bitterlich
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com
> [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of A. Dennis
> Savarese
> Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 8:43 AM
> To: yak-list@matronics.com
> Subject: Re: Yak-List: Banner towing
>
> 100% correct Herb.
> Dennis
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Herb Coussons <mailto:drc@wscare.com>
> To: yak-list@matronics.com
> Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 7:33 AM
> Subject: Re: Yak-List: Banner towing
>
> All I know is - I had a Wilga 35 (experimental exhibition) and
> even though it was approved for such in the POH, I could not get it in
> the OL's. Also since it is a commercial activity I as told it was off
> limits in an expermental exhibition. I assume the same is true in a
Yak
> or CJ.
>
> Herb
>
>
> On Jul 12, 2010, at 3:30 AM, Jay McIntyre wrote:
>
>
> Hi all...
> Just wondering if anyone has ever put a banner towing
> rig on a CJ (or Yak)?
> Personally I don't really want to know about it, but a
> customer has posed the question!
>
> regards, Jay
> New Zealand
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Dr. Herb Coussons, MD
> drc@wscare.com
> 2641 Development Drive
> Green Bay, WI 54311
> Cell 920-639-8434
> Work 920-338-6868
> Fax 920-338-6869
>
>
>
>
>
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>
>
href='3D"http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List"'>http://www.matron
> ics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
>
>
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>
> href='3D"http://forums.matronics.com"'>http://forums.matronics.com
>
>
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>
>
href='3D"http://www.matronics.com/contribution"'>http://www.matronics.co
> m/contribution
>
>
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> 3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-L-> http://forum
- List Contribution Web Site -
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
I am preparing for a checkout in a friend's CJ-6, and don't have access to the
manuals right now... Does anyone have an electronic copy of a "flight manual"
of sorts, or know where to get one?
Thanks for the help.
-Steve Fiegel
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=304658#304658
Message 4
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Banner towing |
The thing that really-concerns me is the no flight over densely populated
thing =0Athat they put in OL, with urban sprawl its kind of hard not to fl
y over someones =0Ahouse, talk to almost any inspector and they feel that t
wo guys standing next to =0Aan outhouse in the Arctic-is considered dense
ly populated (that bit me in the =0Aass many years ago). =0A=0ABill=0A=0A
=0A=0A________________________________=0AFrom: Warren Hill <k7wx@earthlink.
net>=0ATo: yak-list@matronics.com=0ASent: Mon, July 12, 2010 11:36:45 PM=0A
Subject: Re: Yak-List: Banner towing=0A=0ABill, =0A=0AI'll need to go to th
e hanger to get copies of the original and updated =0Aoperating limitations
.-=0A=0AFrom what I recall in speaking with the examiner, operating limit
ations come in =0Athe form of numbered paragraphs that are cut from some so
urce document using a =0Aword processor and pasted into what they're workin
g on. My first "edit" of the =0Anew operating limitations was reviewed by a
working airline pilot who noticed =0Athat several paragraphs were not only
redundant, but actually superseded others. =0AThe examiner agreed and thos
e were deleted. No drama.-=0A=0AForm this thread I get the impression tha
t some parts of the operating =0Alimitations for an experimental exhibition
aircraft are mandatory, while others =0Amay be at the discretion of the ex
aminer. Get the right guy and things make =0Asense.-=0A=0AWarren=0A=0A=0A
=0A=0AOn Jul 12, 2010, at 4:13 PM, bill wade wrote:=0A=0ASure Mark got that
300 mile thing removed and no night flying removed and no =0Ainstrument fl
ing removed just had to find the proper inspector he did want to =0Asee the
airplane and paperwork. Warren just think of the lousy inspector the =0Apr
evious owner had if the OL was as screwed up as you said, so what did the
=0Ainspector add and remove?=0A>Bill Wade=0A>Yak 52=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A_____
___________________________=0AFrom:-"Bitterlich, Mark G CIV Det Cherry Po
int, MALS-14 64E" =0A<mark.bitterlich@navy.mil>=0A>To:-yak-list@matronics
.com=0A>Sent:-Mon, July 12, 2010 11:39:15 AM=0A>Subject:-RE: Yak-List:
V Det Cherry Point, =0A>MALS-14 64E" <mark.bitterlich@navy.mil>=0A>=0A>Has
anyone had any success at all in getting any original Operating=0A>Limitati
ons removed?--=0A>=0A>Mark Bitterlich=0A>=0A>=0A>-----Original Message-
----=0A>From:-owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com=0A>[mailto:owner-yak-li
st-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of A. Dennis=0A>Savarese=0A>Sent: Monday
, July 12, 2010 8:43 AM=0A>To:-yak-list@matronics.com=0A>Subject: Re: Yak
-List: Banner towing=0A>=0A>100% correct Herb.=0A>Dennis=0A>=0A>--- -
---- Original Message ------=0A>--- From: Herb Coussons <mailto:drc
@wscare.com>--=0A>--- To:-yak-list@matronics.com-=0A>--
- Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 7:33 AM=0A>--- Subject: Re: Yak-List:
Banner towing=0A>=0A>--- All I know is - I had a Wilga 35 (experimen
tal exhibition) and=0A>even though it was approved for such in the POH, I c
ould not get it in=0A>the OL's.- Also since it is a commercial activity I
as told it was off=0A>limits in an expermental exhibition.- I assume the
same is true in a Yak=0A>or CJ.-=0A>=0A>--- Herb=0A>=0A>=0A>--
- On Jul 12, 2010, at 3:30 AM, Jay McIntyre wrote:=0A>=0A>=0A>---
--- Hi all...=0A>--- --- Just wondering if anyone has eve
r put a banner towing=0A>rig on a CJ (or Yak)?=0A>--- --- Perso
nally I don't really want to know about it, but a=0A>customer has posed the
question!=0A>--- ----=0A>--- --- regards, Jay=0A
>--- --- New Zealand=0A>--- ----=0A>--- -
---=0A>--- ----=0A>--- ----=0A>=0A>=0A>
--- Dr. Herb Coussons, MD=0A>----drc@wscare.com=0A>---
2641 Development Drive=0A>--- Green Bay, WI- 54311=0A>--- Cel
l 920-639-8434=0A>--- Work 920-338-6868=0A>--- Fax 920-338-6869
-=0A>=0A>----=0A>----=0A>----=0A>3D=3D=3D=3
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D==0A>3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=0A>--
--=0A>href='3D"http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List"'>http://w
ww.matron=0A>ics.com/Navigator?Yak-List=0A>----=0A>3D=3D=3D=3
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D==0A>3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=0A>--
--=0A>href='3D"http://forums.matronics.com"'>http://forums.matronics.
com=0A>----=0A>3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D==0A>3D
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=0A>----=0A>href='3D"http://www.mat
ronics.com/contribution"'>http://www.matronics.co=0A>m/contribution=0A>-
---=0A>3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D==0A>3D=3D=3D
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
=3D=3D=3D=3D=0A>----http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-
L->-http://forum- - - - - - - List =0A>Contribution Web Site
-=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A> face="courier new,courier">http://www.matronics.
com/Navigator?Yak-List =0A>href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://for
ums.matronics.com =0A>href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http:
=========== =0A=0A=0A=0A
Message 5
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Seems like another open ended way for the FAA to "getcha" doesn't it?
I think again that the answer to that is to know more than the FAA.
When asked why you flew over a "certain area", the answer is simply that
you HAD to because of Flight Safety considerations. Other traffic in
the area is a good one. "Mr. FAA, I had to divert over that densely
populated area because of other aircraft that I was trying to avoid in
flight". Or come up with something else. Cloud cover. Thunderstorms.
Etc. Bottom line, Flight Safety over-rides any and all Operating
Limitations, and as long as the FAA can not prove otherwise, they have
to accept what you say. The burden of proof is on them.
Concur on the FAA's description of "densely populated" as well. That
came up when a guy flew at 500 feet over a boat in the water. FAA
claimed the boat represented a densely populated area and he should have
been at 1000 feet. Sigh.... Small "N" numbers on your aircraft... Never
fly low over the same area twice, never circle at a low altitude, always
be aware that every person and his brother now have a camera handy.
But, they usually take a few seconds to realize that they can take a
picture, they have to get it out, and get it on target, at which
point... Hopefully... You're GONE.
Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of bill wade
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 10:35 AM
Subject: Re: Yak-List: Banner towing
The thing that really concerns me is the no flight over densely
populated thing that they put in OL, with urban sprawl its kind of hard
not to fly over someones house, talk to almost any inspector and they
feel that two guys standing next to an outhouse in the Arctic is
considered densely populated (that bit me in the ass many years ago).
Bill
________________________________
From: Warren Hill <k7wx@earthlink.net>
Sent: Mon, July 12, 2010 11:36:45 PM
Subject: Re: Yak-List: Banner towing
Bill,
I'll need to go to the hanger to get copies of the original and updated
operating limitations.
>From what I recall in speaking with the examiner, operating limitations
come in the form of numbered paragraphs that are cut from some source
document using a word processor and pasted into what they're working on.
My first "edit" of the new operating limitations was reviewed by a
working airline pilot who noticed that several paragraphs were not only
redundant, but actually superseded others. The examiner agreed and those
were deleted. No drama.
Form this thread I get the impression that some parts of the operating
limitations for an experimental exhibition aircraft are mandatory, while
others may be at the discretion of the examiner. Get the right guy and
things make sense.
Warren
On Jul 12, 2010, at 4:13 PM, bill wade wrote:
Sure Mark got that 300 mile thing removed and no night flying
removed and no instrument fling removed just had to find the proper
inspector he did want to see the airplane and paperwork. Warren just
think of the lousy inspector the previous owner had if the OL was as
screwed up as you said, so what did the inspector add and remove?
Bill Wade
Yak 52
________________________________
From: "Bitterlich, Mark G CIV Det Cherry Point, MALS-14 64E"
<mark.bitterlich@navy.mil>
To: yak-list@matronics.com
Sent: Mon, July 12, 2010 11:39:15 AM
Subject: RE: Yak-List: Banner towing
Cherry Point, MALS-14 64E" <mark.bitterlich@navy.mil>
Has anyone had any success at all in getting any original
Operating
Limitations removed?
Mark Bitterlich
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of A.
Dennis
Savarese
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 8:43 AM
To: yak-list@matronics.com
Subject: Re: Yak-List: Banner towing
100% correct Herb.
Dennis
----- Original Message -----
From: Herb Coussons <mailto:drc@wscare.com>
To: yak-list@matronics.com
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 7:33 AM
Subject: Re: Yak-List: Banner towing
All I know is - I had a Wilga 35 (experimental exhibition)
and
even though it was approved for such in the POH, I could not get
it in
the OL's. Also since it is a commercial activity I as told it
was off
limits in an expermental exhibition. I assume the same is true
in a Yak
or CJ.
Herb
On Jul 12, 2010, at 3:30 AM, Jay McIntyre wrote:
Hi all...
Just wondering if anyone has ever put a banner towing
rig on a CJ (or Yak)?
Personally I don't really want to know about it, but a
customer has posed the question!
regards, Jay
New Zealand
Dr. Herb Coussons, MD
drc@wscare.com
2641 Development Drive
Green Bay, WI 54311
Cell 920-639-8434
Work 920-338-6868
Fax 920-338-6869
3D=======================
3D====================
href='3D"http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List"'>http://www.matron
ics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
3D=======================
3D====================
href='3D"http://forums.matronics.com"'>http://forums.matronics.com
<http://forums.matronics.com/>
3D=======================
3D====================
href='3D"http://www.matronics.com/contribution"'>http://www.matronics.co
m/contribution
3D=======================
3D====================
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-L-> http://forum
- List Contribution Web Site -
<http://forums.matronics.com/>
<http://forums.matronics.com/>
<http://forums.matronics.com/>
<http://forums.matronics.com/>
face="courier new,courier"> <http://forums.matronics.com/>
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/co
ntribution
-> <http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List>
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
Message 6
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
The element of surprise always works well. Don't fly the same cardinal
headings for the alleged low flight. Re-attaches are never good. Avoid
frequenting the same area on the same days at the same times of the day. Fly
fast and don't linger around.
You can usually expect the locals that you just bombed to be pretty pissed
especially if you have to exit a failing aircraft and join their midst.
Most Kiwis' do not have a clue what altitude you were at when you flew
over. You were just loud so you had to be low. Besides speed can be
converted to altitude if you do have to bail out or select a field to land
in.
Fly safe and always check 6,
Doc
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bitterlich, Mark G
CIV Det Cherry Point, MALS-14 64E
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 10:17 AM
Subject: RE: Yak-List: Banner towing
MALS-14 64E" <mark.bitterlich@navy.mil>
Seems like another open ended way for the FAA to "getcha" doesn't it?
I think again that the answer to that is to know more than the FAA.
When asked why you flew over a "certain area", the answer is simply that
you HAD to because of Flight Safety considerations. Other traffic in
the area is a good one. "Mr. FAA, I had to divert over that densely
populated area because of other aircraft that I was trying to avoid in
flight". Or come up with something else. Cloud cover. Thunderstorms.
Etc. Bottom line, Flight Safety over-rides any and all Operating
Limitations, and as long as the FAA can not prove otherwise, they have
to accept what you say. The burden of proof is on them.
Concur on the FAA's description of "densely populated" as well. That
came up when a guy flew at 500 feet over a boat in the water. FAA
claimed the boat represented a densely populated area and he should have
been at 1000 feet. Sigh.... Small "N" numbers on your aircraft... Never
fly low over the same area twice, never circle at a low altitude, always
be aware that every person and his brother now have a camera handy.
But, they usually take a few seconds to realize that they can take a
picture, they have to get it out, and get it on target, at which
point... Hopefully... You're GONE.
Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of bill wade
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 10:35 AM
Subject: Re: Yak-List: Banner towing
The thing that really concerns me is the no flight over densely
populated thing that they put in OL, with urban sprawl its kind of hard
not to fly over someones house, talk to almost any inspector and they
feel that two guys standing next to an outhouse in the Arctic is
considered densely populated (that bit me in the ass many years ago).
Bill
________________________________
From: Warren Hill <k7wx@earthlink.net>
Sent: Mon, July 12, 2010 11:36:45 PM
Subject: Re: Yak-List: Banner towing
Bill,
I'll need to go to the hanger to get copies of the original and updated
operating limitations.
>From what I recall in speaking with the examiner, operating limitations
come in the form of numbered paragraphs that are cut from some source
document using a word processor and pasted into what they're working on.
My first "edit" of the new operating limitations was reviewed by a
working airline pilot who noticed that several paragraphs were not only
redundant, but actually superseded others. The examiner agreed and those
were deleted. No drama.
Form this thread I get the impression that some parts of the operating
limitations for an experimental exhibition aircraft are mandatory, while
others may be at the discretion of the examiner. Get the right guy and
things make sense.
Warren
On Jul 12, 2010, at 4:13 PM, bill wade wrote:
Sure Mark got that 300 mile thing removed and no night flying
removed and no instrument fling removed just had to find the proper
inspector he did want to see the airplane and paperwork. Warren just
think of the lousy inspector the previous owner had if the OL was as
screwed up as you said, so what did the inspector add and remove?
Bill Wade
Yak 52
________________________________
From: "Bitterlich, Mark G CIV Det Cherry Point, MALS-14 64E"
<mark.bitterlich@navy.mil>
To: yak-list@matronics.com
Sent: Mon, July 12, 2010 11:39:15 AM
Subject: RE: Yak-List: Banner towing
Cherry Point, MALS-14 64E" <mark.bitterlich@navy.mil>
Has anyone had any success at all in getting any original
Operating
Limitations removed?
Mark Bitterlich
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of A.
Dennis
Savarese
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 8:43 AM
To: yak-list@matronics.com
Subject: Re: Yak-List: Banner towing
100% correct Herb.
Dennis
----- Original Message -----
From: Herb Coussons <mailto:drc@wscare.com>
To: yak-list@matronics.com
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 7:33 AM
Subject: Re: Yak-List: Banner towing
All I know is - I had a Wilga 35 (experimental exhibition)
and
even though it was approved for such in the POH, I could not get
it in
the OL's. Also since it is a commercial activity I as told it
was off
limits in an expermental exhibition. I assume the same is true
in a Yak
or CJ.
Herb
On Jul 12, 2010, at 3:30 AM, Jay McIntyre wrote:
Hi all...
Just wondering if anyone has ever put a banner towing
rig on a CJ (or Yak)?
Personally I don't really want to know about it, but a
customer has posed the question!
regards, Jay
New Zealand
Dr. Herb Coussons, MD
drc@wscare.com
2641 Development Drive
Green Bay, WI 54311
Cell 920-639-8434
Work 920-338-6868
Fax 920-338-6869
3D=======================
3D====================
href='3D"http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List"'>http://www.matron
ics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
3D=======================
3D====================
href='3D"http://forums.matronics.com"'>http://forums.matronics.com
<http://forums.matronics.com/>
3D=======================
3D====================
href='3D"http://www.matronics.com/contribution"'>http://www.matronics.co
m/contribution
3D=======================
3D====================
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-L-> http://forum
- List Contribution Web Site -
<http://forums.matronics.com/>
<http://forums.matronics.com/>
<http://forums.matronics.com/>
<http://forums.matronics.com/>
face="courier new,courier"> <http://forums.matronics.com/>
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/co
ntribution
-> <http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List>
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
Message 7
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Housing update, OSH |
Folks,
Just to let you know, the hotel I listed as available several days ago was
taken.
If anyone knows a female needing OSH hotel accomodations July 25-29, I may
be willing to split the hotel. Contact me off-list.
Kind regards to all, fly safe, and see you there.
Elizabeth Rizzo-- -
Message 8
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Banner Towing - Part 2 |
Hi all,
Unfortunately I probably needed to make myself clearer in my question posed
re banner towing with a CJ.
As I live in *New Zealand* our rules are a whole heap different, so all the
BS you guys deal with re limitations and so forth do not apply down here.
(Likewise I do not care for all the American political BS that turns up on
what purports itself to be an international list!)
The question re banner towing has more to do with the practicalities (or
lack of) of installing a banner tow rig on a CJ.
Personally I don't think it is an idea with much merit, but in the interest
of giving my customer the best information I thought would ask the rest of
the community what their thoughts were. Don't worry what the rules say for
now!
regards, Jay
*New Zealand*
Message 9
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Banner towing |
One pass and haul ass.
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=304709#304709
Message 10
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Banner Towing - Part 2 |
I saw a Cj with a remote release tow hook when he stopped for fuel at 3L2.
He told me it came from China with the hook. I can not
remember his name ( Old age and CRS )
Tom Elliott
CJ-6A NX63727
702-595-2680
_____
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jay McIntyre
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 1:51 PM
Subject: Yak-List: Banner Towing - Part 2
Hi all,
Unfortunately I probably needed to make myself clearer in my question posed
re banner towing with a CJ.
As I live in New Zealand our rules are a whole heap different, so all the BS
you guys deal with re limitations and so forth do not apply down here.
(Likewise I do not care for all the American political BS that turns up on
what purports itself to be an international list!)
The question re banner towing has more to do with the practicalities (or
lack of) of installing a banner tow rig on a CJ.
Personally I don't think it is an idea with much merit, but in the interest
of giving my customer the best information I thought would ask the rest of
the community what their thoughts were. Don't worry what the rules say for
now!
regards, Jay
New Zealand
Message 11
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Housai's at high density altitude airports |
Since summer is upon us here in the Southwest, I was wondering if anyone has anything
like a density altitude chart for a Housai Nanchang. There are airports
around here with 10,000 ft. density altitude during much of the summer.
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=304726#304726
Message 12
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Banner Towing - Part 2 |
I had one as well, infact I had two CJ's with the tow hook. I'll
get you some photos of the unit in the next couple of days Jay..
Jim
jalikatz@att.net ( new e-mail address )
Quoting Tom Elliott <N13472@aol.com>:
> I saw a Cj with a remote release tow hook when he stopped for fuel at 3L2.
> He told me it came from China with the hook. I can not
> remember his name ( Old age and CRS )
> Tom Elliott
> CJ-6A NX63727
> 702-595-2680
>
>
> _____
>
> From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com
> [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jay McIntyre
> Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 1:51 PM
> To: yak list
> Subject: Yak-List: Banner Towing - Part 2
>
>
> Hi all,
> Unfortunately I probably needed to make myself clearer in my question posed
> re banner towing with a CJ.
> As I live in New Zealand our rules are a whole heap different, so all the BS
> you guys deal with re limitations and so forth do not apply down here.
> (Likewise I do not care for all the American political BS that turns up on
> what purports itself to be an international list!)
>
> The question re banner towing has more to do with the practicalities (or
> lack of) of installing a banner tow rig on a CJ.
> Personally I don't think it is an idea with much merit, but in the interest
> of giving my customer the best information I thought would ask the rest of
> the community what their thoughts were. Don't worry what the rules say for
> now!
>
> regards, Jay
> New Zealand
>
>
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|