Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 04:46 AM - Re: Romania (Tim Gagnon)
2. 06:36 AM - Aircraft Exhaust Follow Up (Jill Gernetzke)
3. 09:26 AM - Re: Re: Romania (Roger Kemp M.D.)
4. 09:55 AM - 18t oleo (Joe Howse)
5. 11:43 AM - Re: 18t oleo (Bill Geipel)
6. 12:41 PM - Re: 18t oleo (Didier Blouzard)
7. 04:36 PM - Re: 18t oleo (Vic)
8. 06:34 PM - Re: Re: 18t oleo (Joe Howse)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Nope..but we can throw those two over priced airframes into the mix.
400K for a Yak-52...I can see that..especially for a government.
I would be less concerned about what Vietnam is paying for a Yak-52 and more concerned
about parts and spares availability. I would guess that if availability
continues to be an issue, so will value of these airplanes. I know the P-51
community can pretty much make a brand new P-51 these days, it comes at an enormous
cost. A friend of mine had a Mustang that needed one prop blade. If I recall,
it cost him about 20K shipped. Multiply that by 4 plus a hub and spinner......point
is, is it cost effective (or productive) for someone to start making
parts that are simply no longer available?
viperdoc(at)mindspring.co wrote:
> Okay knew you were not referring to the Raptor or the Lightening II.
> Doc
>
> --
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=322334#322334
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Aircraft Exhaust Follow Up |
Guys,
I wanted to let you know that I appreciated your help. One example of why
this list is so great is that I received phone calls and e-mail off-list
offering support for my request. I also received an e-mail from Aircraft
Exhaust - they have had a family emergency and will return to the shop on
December 7th.
Thanks again for your help!
Jill
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Copy, Jack Rouch has a new niche for his NASCAR engine and frame companies.
Not that he needs one. He makes P-51 airframe parts as well as parts for
the Merlin. Glad someone is doing it. With CADD, parts for the YAK can be
machined also at a cost. Question is, will the YAK community support those
costs? I have my doubts after my excursion into making Carbon Monoxide
scrubbers. A company for NASCAR makes them now...they are not cheap but are
effective. Not sure they will sell them to the aviation community with all
the associated liability.
Doc
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tim Gagnon
Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2010 6:44 AM
Subject: Yak-List: Re: Romania
Nope..but we can throw those two over priced airframes into the mix.
400K for a Yak-52...I can see that..especially for a government.
I would be less concerned about what Vietnam is paying for a Yak-52 and more
concerned about parts and spares availability. I would guess that if
availability continues to be an issue, so will value of these airplanes. I
know the P-51 community can pretty much make a brand new P-51 these days, it
comes at an enormous cost. A friend of mine had a Mustang that needed one
prop blade. If I recall, it cost him about 20K shipped. Multiply that by 4
plus a hub and spinner......point is, is it cost effective (or productive)
for someone to start making parts that are simply no longer available?
viperdoc(at)mindspring.co wrote:
> Okay knew you were not referring to the Raptor or the Lightening II.
> Doc
>
> --
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=322334#322334
Message 4
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Does anyone have a drawing for the landing gear oleo struts,
Joe
Message 5
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Yes.
----- Original Message -----
From: Joe Howse
To: Yak-List@Matronics.Com
Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2010 11:53 AM
Subject: Yak-List: 18t oleo
Does anyone have a drawing for the landing gear oleo struts,
Joe
Message 6
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Please could you share.
I am very interested in all technical drawings or information about the 18T.
Thanks very much.
Best rgds
Didier
2010/12/5 Bill Geipel <czech6@mesanetworks.net>
> Yes.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Joe Howse <joeh@shaw.ca>
> *To:* Yak-List@Matronics.Com
> *Sent:* Sunday, December 05, 2010 11:53 AM
> *Subject:* Yak-List: 18t oleo
>
> Does anyone have a drawing for the landing gear oleo struts,
>
> Joe
>
> *
>
> href="http://www.aeroelectric.com">www.aeroelectric.com
> href="http://www.buildersbooks.com">www.buildersbooks.com
> href="http://www.homebuilthelp.com">www.homebuilthelp.com
> href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/chref="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
> href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com*
>
> *
>
>
--
Didier BLOUZARD
didier.blouzard@gmail.com
0624243672
Message 7
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Hello Joe,
maybe some photos could help : For disassembling open top and bottom gas valves,
drain the oil from the top valve. Unscrew the threaded ring at the bottom and
pull the leg out. There are sets of o-rings for static and dynamic sealing,
and a felt "seal" . The damping valve could do with some mod I believe. Watch
this place for my findings.
Cheers
Vic
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=322394#322394
Attachments:
http://forums.matronics.com//files/top_bush_203.jpg
http://forums.matronics.com//files/damping_valve_883.jpg
http://forums.matronics.com//files/bottom_bush_186.jpg
http://forums.matronics.com//files/assembly_190.jpg
Message 8
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
>Vic
Thanks, we have not tied to drop it out yet but your observations are
already a help
Joe
>
>
> maybe some photos could help : For disassembling open top and bottom gas
> valves, drain the oil from the top valve. Unscrew the threaded ring at the
> bottom and pull the leg out. There are sets of o-rings for static and
> dynamic sealing, and a felt "seal" . The damping valve could do with some
> mod I believe. Watch this place for my findings.
>
> Cheers
> Vic
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=322394#322394
>
>
> Attachments:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com//files/top_bush_203.jpg
> http://forums.matronics.com//files/damping_valve_883.jpg
> http://forums.matronics.com//files/bottom_bush_186.jpg
> http://forums.matronics.com//files/assembly_190.jpg
>
>
>
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|