Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 12:39 AM - Re: Yak-52D (Jan Mevis)
2. 08:32 AM - GT new blades parts (ALEXGTPROPELLERS)
3. 08:53 AM - Re: Composite V530 Propeller Blades & Spinners (Tim Gagnon)
4. 10:14 AM - Re: Re: Composite V530 Propeller Blades & Spinners (Eric Wobschall)
5. 11:01 AM - NASTAR Center Research - New Dates (shinden33)
6. 11:38 AM - Fw: Hand propping an airplane (Kelley Monroe)
7. 12:04 PM - Re: Fw: Hand propping an airplane (A. Dennis Savarese)
8. 12:04 PM - Re: NASTAR Center Research - New Dates (Roger Kemp M.D.)
9. 12:49 PM - Re: Composite V530 Propeller Blades & Spinners (Tim Gagnon)
10. 01:10 PM - Re: Re: Composite V530 Propeller Blades & Spinners (Eric Wobschall)
11. 02:16 PM - Re: Composite V530 Propeller Blades & Spinners (Tim Gagnon)
12. 04:47 PM - Re: Fw: Hand propping an airplane (dabear)
13. 07:55 PM - Re: NASTAR Center Research - New Dates (shinden33)
14. 08:32 PM - Re: Re: NASTAR Center Research - New Dates (Roger Kemp)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Yes, but ugly. The aircraft was presented last year in Germany on a fair.
It's not a Yak anymore (very long nose). But impressive though.
It seems that the engine is not too heavy, some 250 kg !
Jan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-
> server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Cpayne
> Sent: woensdag 2 februari 2011 7:35
> To: yak-list
> Subject: Yak-List: Yak-52D
>
>
> That's "D" for Diesel. Just opened up my Sport Aviation and spotted the
> article on the Raikhlin 500HP V-12 Diesel. They put it into a Yak-52
> and it runs on Jet A.
>
> Strong like Ox, Smart like Tractor!
>
> Craig Payne
>
>
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | GT new blades parts |
HI,pics of our blade retentions machined from new.
The small one is for the M-14 blade application and the big one is for the Griffon/Spitfire.
Both blades use same old/modern technology and an evergreen material as wood !!
Bye to all.
Alex
www.gt-propellers.com
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=329451#329451
Attachments:
http://forums.matronics.com//files/dscn2143_132.jpg
Message 3
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Composite V530 Propeller Blades & Spinners |
I had Whirlwind refurbed blades on my -50 and they were beautiful!
Personally, in this economy, I would buy something made here in the United States
by American workers.
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=329455#329455
Message 4
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Composite V530 Propeller Blades & Spinners |
Says the guy with the Russian airplane. Sorry... couldn't resist.
On Feb 3, 2011, at 11:50 AM, Tim Gagnon wrote:
>
> I had Whirlwind refurbed blades on my -50 and they were beautiful!
>
> Personally, in this economy, I would buy something made here in the United States
by American workers.
>
>
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=329455#329455
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Message 5
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | NASTAR Center Research - New Dates |
All,
As mentioned in an earlier post, the National Aerospace Training and Research (NASTAR)
Center in Southampton, PA (north of Philadelphia) is conducting research
into advanced methods of pilot training using high performance simulators capable
of sustaining high g. These are based on articulated, non-traditional
centrifuge devices. In order to conduct this research we are in need of pilots
with current military or aerobatic experience who can visit the center for 5
consecutive days to participate. The next scheduled session is 14 through 18
February, however, there will be future sessions to be scheduled later. If you
are interested in participating or know someone that is please contact me for
more information.
Best Regards,
Scott Glaser
661-754-2732
scott.t.glaser@defiantco.com.
--------
The Defiant Company
www.defiantco.com
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=329476#329476
Message 6
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Fw: Hand propping an airplane |
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul L Anderson
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 1:15 PM
Subject: Fw: Hand propping an airplane
From: B. Anderson
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 10:26 AM
Subject: Fw: Hand propping an airplane
"Common sense isn't as common as it once was!"
"Good judgment comes from experience which comes from bad judgment."
Maybe next time he will give more consideration to the idea of
just purchasing a new battery for his airplane
Instead of doing the hand propping.
Message 7
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Fw: Hand propping an airplane |
Looks like the backs of some of the Manatees I've seen on the
intercoastal waterway down in Florida from powerboat prop strikes. Uggggh.
Really ugly! This definitely got my attention though.
Thanks Kelley.
Dennis
On 2/3/2011 1:26 PM, Kelley Monroe wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Paul L Anderson <mailto:aass5040@fca-net.com>
> *To:* k m <mailto:kelmonroe@comcast.net>
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 03, 2011 1:15 PM
> *Subject:* Fw: Hand propping an airplane
>
> *From:* B. Anderson <mailto:bpajapan@yahoo.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 03, 2011 10:26 AM
> *To:* Paul L Anderson <mailto:aass5040@fca-net.com>
> *Subject:* Fw: Hand propping an airplane
>
>
> "Common sense isn't as common as it once was!"
> "Good judgment comes from experience which comes from bad judgment."
>
> Maybe next time he will give more consideration to the idea of just
> purchasing a new battery for his airplane
>
> Instead of doing the hand propping.
>
Message 8
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: NASTAR Center Research - New Dates |
Scott, so someone has finally hit on the idea that I talked about 20 years ago
while on AD. Putting simulators in the centrfugre.
Doc
Sent from my iPad
On Feb 3, 2011, at 12:58 PM, "shinden33" <scott.t.glaser@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> All,
>
> As mentioned in an earlier post, the National Aerospace Training and Research
(NASTAR) Center in Southampton, PA (north of Philadelphia) is conducting research
into advanced methods of pilot training using high performance simulators
capable of sustaining high g. These are based on articulated, non-traditional
centrifuge devices. In order to conduct this research we are in need of pilots
with current military or aerobatic experience who can visit the center for
5 consecutive days to participate. The next scheduled session is 14 through
18 February, however, there will be future sessions to be scheduled later. If
you are interested in participating or know someone that is please contact me
for more information.
>
> Best Regards,
> Scott Glaser
> 661-754-2732
> scott.t.glaser@defiantco.com.
>
> --------
> The Defiant Company
> www.defiantco.com
>
>
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=329476#329476
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Message 9
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Composite V530 Propeller Blades & Spinners |
touche
That airplane is gone. Did not feel like feeding Russian capitalism anymore when
I can feed US capitalism!! (RV in the future)
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=329491#329491
Message 10
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Composite V530 Propeller Blades & Spinners |
OR... how about a Pitts Special?
On Feb 3, 2011, at 3:46 PM, Tim Gagnon wrote:
>
> touche
>
> That airplane is gone. Did not feel like feeding Russian capitalism anymore when
I can feed US capitalism!! (RV in the future)
>
>
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=329491#329491
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Message 11
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Composite V530 Propeller Blades & Spinners |
Not a Pitts fan....
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=329502#329502
Message 12
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Fw: Hand propping an airplane |
I hope that person is doing better now.
I've hand propped my CJ with the M14P and helped others. There are safe
ways to hand prop. There are people pulling their prop through that put
themselves in more danger than hand propping. At least I know the engine
should start when I'm touching it .
Bear
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Kelley Monroe
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 2:27 PM
Subject: Yak-List: Fw: Hand propping an airplane
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul L Anderson <mailto:aass5040@fca-net.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 1:15 PM
Subject: Fw: Hand propping an airplane
From: B. Anderson <mailto:bpajapan@yahoo.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 10:26 AM
Subject: Fw: Hand propping an airplane
"Common sense isn't as common as it once was!"
"Good judgment comes from experience which comes from bad judgment."
Maybe next time he will give more consideration to the idea of just
purchasing a new battery for his airplane
Instead of doing the hand propping.
Message 13
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: NASTAR Center Research - New Dates |
Doc,
The idea was first tried in the late 60's but what they didn't account for was that the arm had to be extremely stiff and tuned to deal with the motions of the dome sim. It wasn't until the last 10 years that the money and technology were available to develop a viable device. That's why we say it's non-traditional. It is far more advanced and different than the traditional devices the military puts you guys through (the main reason the USAF just bought one and is installing it at WPAFB). The one at NASTAR has been operational for about 4 years and it's a blast to fly. If you go to this link ( http://www.nastarcenter.com/training/military ) there's a video on the left of the Blue Angles wringing it out. Enjoy.
Scott
--------
The Defiant Company
www.defiantco.com
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=329539#329539
Message 14
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: NASTAR Center Research - New Dates |
Scott,
Thanks. Understand the translational motion with the gondola under G. Will watch
how far you guys have come with an idea that was first bounced off then Major
Jim Wintery by this then young Captain as I was completing his guinea pig program
for teaching G lock. Damnedcwhere did the years g!?
Doc
-----Original Message-----
>From: shinden33 <scott.t.glaser@gmail.com>
>Sent: Feb 3, 2011 9:53 PM
>To: yak-list@matronics.com
>Subject: Yak-List: Re: NASTAR Center Research - New Dates
>
>
>Doc,
>
>The idea was first tried in the late 60's but what they didn't account for was that the arm had to be extremely stiff and tuned to deal with the motions of the dome sim. It wasn't until the last 10 years that the money and technology were available to develop a viable device. That's why we say it's non-traditional. It is far more advanced and different than the traditional devices the military puts you guys through (the main reason the USAF just bought one and is installing it at WPAFB). The one at NASTAR has been operational for about 4 years and it's a blast to fly. If you go to this link ( http://www.nastarcenter.com/training/military ) there's a video on the left of the Blue Angles wringing it out. Enjoy.
>
>Scott
>
>--------
>The Defiant Company
>www.defiantco.com
>
>
>Read this topic online here:
>
>http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=329539#329539
>
>
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|