Yak-List Digest Archive

Mon 02/21/11


Total Messages Posted: 4



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 03:47 AM - Re: torque settings to lock blades (flyayak)
     2. 04:25 AM - Re: Re: torque settings to lock blades (Eric Wobschall)
     3. 05:54 AM - Re: Re: torque settings to lock blades (A. Dennis Savarese)
     4. 10:04 AM - Re: Re: torque settings to lock blades (Walter Lannon)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:47:54 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: torque settings to lock blades
    From: "flyayak" <sschne3082@aol.com>
    Hi all, sorry, but now Im a bit confused. Is it 60 or 75 lb/ft (the last one seems really a bit high)? And by the way, the 6 nuts behind the prop flange should be tightened with 87 ft/lbs, right? Thanks a lot. Stefan Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=331696#331696


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:25:51 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: torque settings to lock blades
    From: Eric Wobschall <eric@buffaloskyline.com>
    87 is fine for the prop flange. be sure to use the proper calculation if you're using a dogbone extension, which you pretty much have to. Here's a calculator on the internet: http://www.belknaptools.com/extcalc.asp Looking around for the counterweight figure, and it is tight, but not that tight as I recall (more like 40). Plus, it's a castle nut, so you don't get it right on (could be up to 30 degrees to the closest increment). I'll post it if I can find it. On Feb 21, 2011, at 6:45 AM, flyayak wrote: > > Hi all, > > sorry, but now Im a bit confused. Is it 60 or 75 lb/ft (the last one seems really a bit high)? > And by the way, the 6 nuts behind the prop flange should be tightened with 87 ft/lbs, right? > > Thanks a lot. > > Stefan > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=331696#331696 > > > > > > > > > >


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:54:38 AM PST US
    From: "A. Dennis Savarese" <dsavarese0812@bellsouth.net>
    Subject: Re: torque settings to lock blades
    Yes, the torque spec I have for the prop flange nuts (22mm) is 87 ft/lbs. Dennis On 2/21/2011 5:45 AM, flyayak wrote: > --> Yak-List message posted by: "flyayak"<sschne3082@aol.com> > > Hi all, > > sorry, but now Im a bit confused. Is it 60 or 75 lb/ft (the last one seems really a bit high)? > And by the way, the 6 nuts behind the prop flange should be tightened with 87 ft/lbs, right? > > Thanks a lot. > > Stefan > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=331696#331696 > >


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:04:19 AM PST US
    From: Walter Lannon <wlannon@persona.ca>
    Subject: Re: torque settings to lock blades
    Blade clamp (c'weight bracket) bolt/nut torque value is 57 to 63 lb/ft. Torque to approx 55 lb/ft then to next cotter pin hole if within torque limit. Torque values given for castelated nuts USUALLY allow for further tighening to line up the next hole. BUT------- Whether that is true of Russian/Chinese specs. I don't know! I would allow only a very smal overtorque.l Having the advantage of a few spare nuts I can usually get away with selective fitting. When that fails I guage the amount of turn required relative to the thread pitch and machine the nut base accordingly. This is arguably the MOST CRITICAL torque value on the entire engine/airframe combination. Walt. Walt ----- Original Message ----- From: "flyayak" <sschne3082@aol.com> Sent: Monday, February 21, 2011 3:45 AM Subject: Yak-List: Re: torque settings to lock blades > > Hi all, > > sorry, but now Im a bit confused. Is it 60 or 75 lb/ft (the last one > seems really a bit high)? > And by the way, the 6 nuts behind the prop flange should be tightened with > 87 ft/lbs, right? > > Thanks a lot. > > Stefan > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=331696#331696 > > >




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   yak-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Yak-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/yak-list
  • Browse Yak-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/yak-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --