Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 07:49 AM - Re: CJ6 trim cable (Joe Howse)
2. 07:41 PM - Re: L29-List: 8130-2G (Jon Boede)
3. 08:08 PM - Re: L29-List: 8130-2G (Paul)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: CJ6 trim cable |
Daniel
Trim cable routing from Chinese manual
Joe
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | RE: L29-List: 8130-2G |
I called EAA Warbirds today and talked with a nice gentleman who said that
they and CJAA are having a meeting next month to iron some of the nonsense
out.
He said that once that meeting takes place the FAA will issue deviation let
ters for anybody who's caught between April 15th and when 8130.2G Change 1
is published (whenever that is=2C in the distant future).
EAA's and CJAA's position on the changes is exactly what you'd want them to
be... very reasonable and questioning *all* the nonsense in 2G ex/ex opera
ting limitations section=3B they have a long list.
Of course the take-away is Thank Goodness for these guys... if you don't be
long to EAA Warbirds=2C you should. If you don't belong to CJAA=2C you sho
uld. If you don't belong to RPA=2C you should. Don't just sit and be than
kful that it's the Hot Ejection Seat guys and not You that's getting slippe
d the wiener this time -- the "life limited parts" stuff in 2G is the FAA c
amel's nose under our collective skirt. =3B-) As usual=2C it's pretty obv
ious that Yon Administrator thinks the safest warbird is one that's grounde
d... you can see which way the FAA would head in a big hurry if EAA=2C CJAA
and RPA weren't raising holy heck about it. Oh=2C and apparently the Army
Aviation Foundation has their war paint on as well... good guys.
More news as it develops.
Jon
> Date: Wed=2C 23 Mar 2011 18:30:16 -0500
> From: ainut@knology.net
> To: l29-list@matronics.com
> Subject: Re: L29-List: 8130-2G
>
> --> L29-List message posted by: David <ainut@knology.net>
>
> Anyone friends with a Congresscritter that is over the FAA knuckleheads?
>
> David
>
>
> colyergreg@aol.com wrote:
> > All of our ex-military jets will be paper weights or on sticks on our
> > front lawns.
> >
> >
> > Greg
> > 415-531-0970
> > www.AceMakerAirshows.com <http://www.AceMakerAirshows.com>
> >
> > On Mar 23=2C 2011=2C at 9:18 AM=2C Royal Tony <anthony.royal@volvo.com
> > <mailto:anthony.royal@volvo.com>> wrote:
> >
> >> The new 8130-2G addresses the life limited parts issue and allows an
> >> experimental exhibition aircraft to fly without having life limited
> >> parts complied with. More restrictions over congested area and no
> >> passengers. I was told by my FSDO that until Washington proves that
> >> there are life limited parts on an L-29=2C I was free to fly but that
> >> the new 8130 addressed this and was a mute point now.
> >> I just purchased and currently flying the L-29 so I am a newbie. I do
> >> know that if the FAA implements any or all of the life limited parts
> >> on a list I have seen=2C some L-29's may become large paper weights.
> >> The choice may be flying with restrictions or a large lawn ornament?
> >>
> >> */Anthony (Tony) Royal/*
> >>
> >> *
> >>
> >>
> >> *
> > *
> >
> >
> > *
>
> --
> If you're an American=2C just say NO to the Obamanation=2C to socialism
=2C and get rid of Soros.
>
>
===========
===========
===========
===========
>
>
>
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: L29-List: 8130-2G |
Excellent. Thanks Jon.
- Paul
----- Original Message -----
From: Jon Boede
To: l29-list@matronics.com ; l39-list@matronics.com ;
yak-list@matronics.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 10:35 PM
Subject: RE: L29-List: 8130-2G
I called EAA Warbirds today and talked with a nice gentleman who said
that they and CJAA are having a meeting next month to iron some of the
nonsense out.
He said that once that meeting takes place the FAA will issue
deviation letters for anybody who's caught between April 15th and when
8130.2G Change 1 is published (whenever that is, in the distant future).
EAA's and CJAA's position on the changes is exactly what you'd want
them to be... very reasonable and questioning *all* the nonsense in 2G
ex/ex operating limitations section; they have a long list.
Of course the take-away is Thank Goodness for these guys... if you
don't belong to EAA Warbirds, you should. If you don't belong to CJAA,
you should. If you don't belong to RPA, you should. Don't just sit and
be thankful that it's the Hot Ejection Seat guys and not You that's
getting slipped the wiener this time -- the "life limited parts" stuff
in 2G is the FAA camel's nose under our collective skirt. ;-) As
usual, it's pretty obvious that Yon Administrator thinks the safest
warbird is one that's grounded... you can see which way the FAA would
head in a big hurry if EAA, CJAA and RPA weren't raising holy heck about
it. Oh, and apparently the Army Aviation Foundation has their war paint
on as well... good guys.
More news as it develops.
Jon
> Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 18:30:16 -0500
> From: ainut@knology.net
> To: l29-list@matronics.com
> Subject: Re: L29-List: 8130-2G
>
> --> L29-List message posted by: David <ainut@knology.net>
>
> Anyone friends with a Congresscritter that is over the FAA
knuckleheads?
>
> David
>
>
> colyergreg@aol.com wrote:
> > All of our ex-military jets will be paper weights or on sticks on
our
> > front lawns.
> >
> >
> > Greg
> > 415-531-0970
> > www.AceMakerAirshows.com <http://www.AceMakerAirshows.com>
> >
> > On Mar 23, 2011, at 9:18 AM, Royal Tony <anthony.royal@volvo.com
> > <mailto:anthony.royal@volvo.com>> wrote:
> >
> >> The new 8130-2G addresses the life limited parts issue and allows
an
> >> experimental exhibition aircraft to fly without having life
limited
> >> parts complied with. More restrictions over congested area and no
> >> passengers. I was told by my FSDO that until Washington proves
that
> >> there are life limited parts on an L-29, I was free to fly but
that
> >> the new 8130 addressed this and was a mute point now.
> >> I just purchased and currently flying the L-29 so I am a newbie.
I do
> >> know that if the FAA implements any or all of the life limited
parts
> >> on a list I have seen, some L-29's may become large paper
weights.
> >> The choice may be flying with restrictions or a large lawn
ornament?
> >>
> >> */Anthony (Tony) Royal/*
> >>
> >> *
> >>
> >>
> >> *
> > *
> >
> >
> > *
>
> --
> If you're an American, just say NO to the Obamanation, to socialism,
and get rid of Soros.
>
> >======
>
>
>
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|