Yak-List Digest Archive

Tue 05/24/11


Total Messages Posted: 9



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 05:03 AM - Re: (Mark Schrick)
     2. 02:34 PM - Re: No Title (N642K)
     3. 05:03 PM - Re: Program Letter (keithmckinley)
     4. 05:22 PM - Re: Re: Program Letter (Bitterlich, Mark G CIV Det Cherry Point, MALS-14 64E)
     5. 06:17 PM - Re: Program Letter (keithmckinley)
     6. 07:02 PM - Re: Program Letter (keithmckinley)
     7. 07:37 PM - Re: Re: Program Letter (Warren Hill)
     8. 07:49 PM - Re: Re: Program Letter (A. Dennis Savarese)
     9. 08:10 PM - Re: Program Letter (keithmckinley)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:03:21 AM PST US
    From: Mark Schrick <schrick@pacbell.net>
    Subject: Re:
    Internet is boring and uninteresting? But not this site!.. http://team.prophet.free.fr/friends_links.php?ghot=10ot6


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:34:32 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: No Title
    From: "N642K" <mdecanio@mac.com>
    I think we should send the author of the above note a thank you note. schrick@pacbell.net Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=340827#340827


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:03:36 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Program Letter
    From: "keithmckinley" <keith.mckinley@townisp.com>
    k7wx wrote: > As you are not REQUIRED to carry a copy > of the letter with you when traveling > > -- I know this subject is beat up but I've looked and can't find anything regarding whether the PL needs to be with the airplane or not. I carry mine but didn't think it was required. Then again, it seems that the PL may be an addendum to the ops limits and that is required..... Keith -------- Keith McKinley 700HS KFIT Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=340846#340846


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:22:49 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Program Letter
    From: "Bitterlich, Mark G CIV Det Cherry Point, MALS-14 64E" <mark.bitterlich@navy.mil>
    Every FISDO interprets rules differently, which is why there are lawyers. Sigh. I asked MY FISDO and they say it is not required to be carried in the aircraft. They also mentioned other FISDO's might not agree with them and if you are traveling outside of your area, it might be wise to carry it. Makes sense to me. Bottom line in my humble opinion is: Your Operating Limitations spell out exactly what you are required to do. Those Operating Limitations tell you that a Program Letter must be written and submitted to the FAA every year. They do not say that you are required to carry that Program Letter with you. It also gets sticky if you still have your 300 mile limit in your Operating Limitations. Do you? If you do, then if where you are going is outside of that limit and your destination is not on your submitted program letter, you must send in a modification to your program letter. If you do that, I would always carry that with me just to prove to the FAA that I did things right. I have had that limitation REMOVED from my Operating Limitations. That said, if I go somewhere distant, I still think I would send in a notification to the FAA of where I was going. You're not asking permission, you're just keeping them informed, and I don't see any reason not to do that and it tends to show you are working with them instead of against them. That said.... there are also those that say that the less the FAA knows about what you do, the better. I suspect the best answer is just to take the path of least resistance. Ask your local FISDO their opinion on the matter. Mark Bitterlich -----Original Message----- From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of keithmckinley Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2011 8:01 PM Subject: Yak-List: Re: Program Letter <keith.mckinley@townisp.com> k7wx wrote: > As you are not REQUIRED to carry a copy > of the letter with you when traveling > > -- I know this subject is beat up but I've looked and can't find anything regarding whether the PL needs to be with the airplane or not. I carry mine but didn't think it was required. Then again, it seems that the PL may be an addendum to the ops limits and that is required..... Keith -------- Keith McKinley 700HS KFIT Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=340846#340846


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:17:24 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Program Letter
    From: "keithmckinley" <keith.mckinley@townisp.com>
    Mark, Thanks for the feedback. No 300 mile restriction. No doubt it is easier to play nice with the Fed's and yes it does pay dividends, but sometimes I think it's important to make sure they interpret things correctly and realize (as inspectors) they don't make the rules. More than anything, I just have an aversion to ass kissing.......but not to protecting my own ass! Semper Fi Keith -------- Keith McKinley 700HS KFIT Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=340860#340860


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:02:46 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Program Letter
    From: "keithmckinley" <keith.mckinley@townisp.com>
    Mark, Thanks for the feedback. No 300 mile restriction. No doubt it is easier to play nice with the Fed's and yes it does pay dividends, but sometimes I think it's important to make sure they interpret things correctly and realize (as inspectors) they don't make the rules. More than anything, I just have an aversion to ass kissing.......but not to protecting my own ass! Semper Fi Keith -------- Keith McKinley 700HS KFIT Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=340874#340874


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:37:32 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Program Letter
    From: Warren Hill <k7wx@earthlink.net>
    Hello Keith, This is actually what I wrote. Warren On Apr 15, 2011, at 12:24 PM, Warren Hill wrote: > When I first got my CJ, one of the local CJ gurus told me to anticipate getting ramp checked at every event attended. Told me to have a plastic folder in the aft cockpit that contained: > > Copy of license and current medical. > Copy from logbook: Last BFR, last annual, warbird FFA inspection logbook entry. > Phase 2 operating limitations. > Current insurance info. > Picture of expiratory date tag(s) of parachute(s). > Program letter for current year. > Registration & special airworthiness certificate. > Copy of FAST card, if you have one. > > Warren On May 24, 2011, at 5:00 PM, keithmckinley wrote: > > > k7wx wrote: >> As you are not REQUIRED to carry a copy >> of the letter with you when traveling >> >> -- > > > I know this subject is beat up but I've looked and can't find anything regarding whether the PL needs to be with the airplane or not. I carry mine but didn't think it was required. Then again, it seems that the PL may be an addendum to the ops limits and that is required..... > > Keith > > -------- > Keith McKinley > 700HS > KFIT > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=340846#340846 > > > > > > > > > >


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:49:18 PM PST US
    From: "A. Dennis Savarese" <dsavarese0812@bellsouth.net>
    Subject: Re: Program Letter
    Here's something to think about. The program letter and modifications which you may send by fax are in fact part of the Operating Limitations for the airplane. We all know you are required to carry the OL's in the airplane at all times. Since the Program Letter is actually a part of the OL's, then IMHO, it is also required to be carried in the airplane. Unfortunately, when the FAA removed the 300/600 NM proficiency area, they failed to include the elimination of the Program Letter, which would have made logical sense. ie: if you don't have any restrictions as to where you can fly, they why do you need a Program Letter to attend an event? When you attend an event that may also be attended by the FAA (typically when there is wavered airspace) and they ask to see your aircraft's paperwork as well as you pilot certificate and current medical form, when you hand him/her the aircraft's Operating Limitations he/she will also ask to see your Program Letter or modification for this specific event. If you do not have your Program Letter with the specific event on it or a modification/update to the program letter which you submitted to your FSDO with you, the FAA person may not permit you to stay at the event. I had this happen to me about 5 years ago. Thus, when I sent my program letter in to the FSDO each year, I automatically put a copy in the airplane along with any modifications. Dennis On 5/24/2011 9:00 PM, keithmckinley wrote: > --> Yak-List message posted by: "keithmckinley"<keith.mckinley@townisp.com> > > Mark, > > Thanks for the feedback. > > No 300 mile restriction. No doubt it is easier to play nice with the Fed's and yes it does pay dividends, but sometimes I think it's important to make sure they interpret things correctly and realize (as inspectors) they don't make the rules. More than anything, I just have an aversion to ass kissing.......but not to protecting my own ass! > > Semper Fi > > Keith > > -------- > Keith McKinley > 700HS > KFIT > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=340874#340874 > >


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:10:57 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Program Letter
    From: "keithmckinley" <keith.mckinley@townisp.com>
    well said. -------- Keith McKinley 700HS KFIT Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=340885#340885




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   yak-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Yak-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/yak-list
  • Browse Yak-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/yak-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --