Yak-List Digest Archive

Sat 08/13/11


Total Messages Posted: 3



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 03:57 PM - Re: Yak/CJ minimum requirements (CD 2.0)
     2. 06:06 PM - Yak/CJ minimum requirements (Jon Boede) (Jerry Painter)
     3. 06:15 PM - Warning - New Bose Line Power Cables Only 3' Long! (Matt Dralle)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:57:33 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Yak/CJ minimum requirements
    From: "CD 2.0" <dbowie2007@hotmail.com>
    well said... in other words.... there is a difference between minimum requirements and competitive qualifications to fly any aircraft... Minimum criterion will generally consist of quantitative data, i.e., hours, aircraft, ratings, education, etc. ....but this doesn't guarantee a pilot's readability to safely fly a specific type of airplane after several hours of training. Certainly having a minimum requirement list is a way to start... but each pilot should keep in the agenda a periodic review of his/her competitive qualification levels and look up for performance check-rides with a certified instructor to assure there is total proficiency. For a qualified instructor, it may be relatively easy to find out who is ready to fly a Yak/Cj and what the remaining general competitive qualifications be for a safe operation under unknown circumstances. All pilots are different and it's better not to compare yourself to others or base your knowledge on a standard number of hours required to all. Each pilot should keep in consideration that what works for others may not be enough for himself, even if he/she does have a large number of flying hours in other types. Start out by meeting the recommended minimums for the insurance company and the specific association and strive to be the best pilot you can be so that you will one day become competitive. If you believe you are already competitive, get out there and find ways to get your skills reviewed. Continue to update your knowledge with practice and further study making sure that "all the fields are filled in" which demonstrate that you meet the requirements to fly safe. This should be fun and not considered as an obligation... after all we love learning anything related to aviation. Carl cjpilot710(at)aol.com wrote: > The minima amount of time has always (to me anyway) depended on the person. (Some people should never get in an airplane). But ten 10 hours seem to be normal to me for a typical rated pilot. The CJ & Yak require a little more time for a zero time guys to learn than say a Cub/Champ, requiring better understanding of their systems. However one thing for certain, an instructor who does not cover the total stall series in either aircraft is tantamount to being a killer. > > In all the military around the world, usually the ones whom are taught to fly are above average. Most military's have carefully controlled training programs to get students to the solo phase, with integrated steps, to advanced levels. Here that isn't always true in our private sector. Something are missed or skipped. I really believe that we've suffered some fatalities because of lapes in training. These like almost all other aircraft are slow, cross controled, low altitude, spin entries. The bain of the low time pilot, miss trained pilot. > > Jim "Pappy" Goolsby > > Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=349334#349334


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:06:35 PM PST US
    From: "Jerry Painter" <wild.blue@frontier.com>
    Subject: Yak/CJ minimum requirements (Jon Boede)


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:15:39 PM PST US
    From: Matt Dralle <dralle@matronics.com>
    Subject: Warning - New Bose Line Power Cables Only 3' Long!
    Just a heads up to those installing or planning on installing Bose X or A20 Active NR headsets using the inline power jacks. Specifically these units: http://www.bose.com/controller?url=/shop_online/headphones/aviation_headsets/accessories/headset_installkit_acc.jsp They now come with only 3 feet of cable! Three years ago they came with 6 feet of cable and I thought at the time that 6 feet seemed a little short. Now 3 feet? What idiot penny pincher in Bose marketing decided "three feet should be plenty". Here's quote from the Bose web page above: "Three-foot wiring harness with six pin female connector allows for *placement in locations throughout aircraft*." WTF? On what planet will a 3-foot hardness reach "locations throughout the aircraft". That's just plain stupid. If these were third rate, el-cheapo headsets, I'd write it off to penny pinching, but for a >$1000 product that you then have to spend an additional $32 for an installation cable, cheaping out on the cable length is just simply unacceptable. I have the jacks mounted in the center of the RV-8, and the cables don't even reach to the righthand control console. What does Bose expect people to do; splice the wire? That's ridiculous! What would somebody installing in the back seats of a 4 or 6 place airplane do? Of course I wrote a scathing email to Bose Support just now. I'm sure they will write back with "for most of our customers, three feet is sufficient". Given this direction within Bose, I'd definitely consider the new Sennheiser S1 if I had to do it over again. Additionally, the Sennheiser's Bluetooth supports the A2DP, AVRCP STEREO profiles. The Bose A20's Bluetooth does NOT support stereo. It must have been the same marketing moron that dictated 3' cables that decided not to include stereo Bluetooth profiles. Unbelievable. Matt - Matt "Red Dawg" Dralle RV-8 #82880 N998RV "Ruby Vixen" http://www.mattsrv8.com - Matt's Complete RV-8 Construction Log http://www.mattsrv8.com/Mishap - Landing Mishap Rebuild Log http://www.youtube.com/MattsRV8 - Matt's RV-8 HDTV YouTube Channel Status: 170+ Hours TTSN - Rebuilding Fuselage After Landing Mishap...




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   yak-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Yak-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/yak-list
  • Browse Yak-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/yak-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --