Yak-List Digest Archive

Fri 10/07/11


Total Messages Posted: 18



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 06:27 AM - Re: Recommendation M-14 engines (Yak Pilot)
     2. 06:39 AM - Re: Recommendation M-14 engines (A. Dennis Savarese)
     3. 07:00 AM - Re: Recommendation M-14 engines (George Coy)
     4. 09:49 AM - Re: Recommendation M-14 engines (Walter Lannon)
     5. 10:23 AM - Re: Recommendation M-14 engines (Yak Pilot)
     6. 10:43 AM - Re:8 (Mark Schrick)
     7. 11:16 AM - Re: Recommendation M-14 engines (mikspin)
     8. 11:38 AM - Re: Re: Recommendation M-14 engines (Yak Pilot)
     9. 12:07 PM - Re: Re: Recommendation M-14 engines (A. Dennis Savarese)
    10. 12:29 PM - Re: Re:8 (doug sapp)
    11. 12:37 PM - Re: Recommendation M-14 engines (mikspin)
    12. 01:06 PM - Re: Re: Recommendation M-14 engines (Didier Blouzard)
    13. 02:07 PM - Re: Recommendation M-14 engines (Elmar Hegenauer)
    14. 02:58 PM - Re: Re: Recommendation M-14 engines (A. Dennis Savarese)
    15. 03:04 PM - Re: Re: Recommendation M-14 engines (A. Dennis Savarese)
    16. 03:54 PM - Re: Recommendation M-14 engines (Elmar Hegenauer)
    17. 03:59 PM - Re: Re: Electric Fuel Pump (Paul Lewis)
    18. 04:56 PM - Worldwide Warbirds alive and well! (barryhancock)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:27:53 AM PST US
    From: Yak Pilot <yakplt@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: Recommendation M-14 engines
    That's an interesting discussion Walt.- Basically from what I read, you a re saying in a nutshell that due to piston TDC dwell, the TIMERITE is not a ccurate for determining TDC, and I see that logic perfectly.- =0A-=0AYo u made a comment that "a few" of the M-14P engines use the M9F mag but most others use mags with auto-advance.--That's intesting because every M-1 4 that I have worked on use the M9F fixed timing mags.- That includes fiv e M-14P's, and seven M14PF's.- From that LESS than broad experiece I came to the conclusion (which could easily be wrong) that most M-14P and PF eng ines that came stock with the YAK-50, YAK-52, YAK-55, Sukhoi-26,29,31 serie s came with the M9F mag stock.- Those are the models I have direct experi ence with, but admittedly only one or two of each model.- I own two YAK-5 0's (one wrecked) with M-14P engines, one 1974 model with original engine a nd one 1984- model with original engine, both with M9F mags.- =0A-=0A That said, I have heard that the mags with mechanical advance will work equ ally was well.- Dennis, can you add to this?- George or Cliff Coy?- W hat are the usual mag configurations (stock) on M-14's?- =0A-=0AYou've used this device on an M-14, and I have not.- So excuse a stupid question if I may.- If you can determine the total piston dwell by coming up to t he point of no movement (Before TDC) and then where it starts to move again (after TDC), determine total number of "no movement degrees" then divide b y 2, would you not get a reasonable point of accuracy for TDC?- Just wond ering.- This problem has perplexed me for quite some time, as with a spin ner on the aircraft, measuring prop angle is next to impossible, and even w ith the spinner off, the spinner backplate also adds to the problem.- I h ave experimented with laser measuring, with a modicum of success, but refle ction from the piston often refracts and- without putting a reflector on the piston I've given up on that.- =0A-=0ASo at this point I guess my s uggestion to have TIMERITE make arms and scales for the M-14 might only app ly to those that use M9F mags.- =0A-=0AHmmm.- =0A-=0AThanks Walt. =0A-=0AMark=0A-=0A=0AFrom: Walter Lannon <wlannon@shaw.ca>=0ATo: yak-li st@matronics.com=0ASent: Friday, October 7, 2011 12:16 AM=0ASubject: Re: Ya k-List: Recommendation M-14 engines=0A=0A=0AHi Mark=0A-=0AHaving already -fabricated an arm and scale for my-TIMERITE to accommodate the Ivchenc o series engines I can tell you it is barely worth the effort.=0A-=0AThe -TIMERITE is an excellent timing device but like any other magneto timing system that-utilizes piston position it becomes increasingly less accura te as the timing specification approaches TDC.=0A-=0AThis of course is a result of piston dwell where the piston is stationary-through an-angle of- 4 to 5 degs. either side of TDC.- In that area the TIMERITE is tota lly useless.=0A-=0AHaving said that the M14P engine-WITH the specified fixed spark M9F magneto is-good candidate for the TIMERITE since the timi ng angle (and therefore the setting angle) is 23 degs.(crankshaft) BTDC.=0A -=0AHowever a few M14P's and (as far as I know) all other variants of the Ivchenko line utilize the M9, M9-25M or M9-35M.- =0AThese of course are all auto advance mags and, varying with engine model,-are timed with sett ing angles in the area of-10 degs. BTDC to 10 degs. ATDC-and therefore must be timed by direct reference to the crankshaft (or corresponding prop shaft) angle.=0A-=0AAnd NO, my arm and scale are not available under any circumstance.- They were just a test for my own personal-information. - The TIMERITE is a patented, currently available device and if ATS think there is an acceptable market they will design and manufacture as necessar y.=0A-=0ACheers; =0AWalt- =0A=0A-=0A----- Original Message ----- =0A> From: Yak Pilot =0A>To: yak-list@matronics.com =0A>Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2011 12:41 PM=0A>Subject: Yak-List: Recommendation M-14 engines=0A>=0A> =0A>This should probably be on the M-14 engine list, (which I will get arou nd to doing), but for now just a recommendation for every M-14 engine owner on this list.- (Of course this might-equally apply to-Housai engines as well!-)=0A>=0A>As anyone knows who has timed an M-14, it is not exact ly an easy process and it is very difficult to get dead nuts accurate.- T ypically we finish, hope for the best and check mag drop as a confidence fa ctor.- =0A>=0A>There are several ways to "do this better" when attempting the process, but one of the easier ways to time an engine is with the Airc raft Tool and Supply Company TIMERITE device.- This is actually the same way the Russians attempt it, but with a much more accurate instrument.- =0A>=0A>Apparent;ly the TIMERITE timing tool does not have gauge arms and s cales developed for the M-14 engine, which actually is kind of odd since th ere are more of these engines in this country flying than there are some of the older radial engine designs that they have developed scales for. =0A> =0A>One of the ways to influence this is simply to call these folks up, tel l them that you have an M-14, and would like to see them develop their prod uct so it can be used on YOUR engine.- Heck, it's a toll free call:- 1- 800-248-0638- =0A>=0A>I am not saying there are not better methods than t he TIMERITE (A Laser scale comes to mind), but being able to purchase and u se this instrument on M-14 engines would be of benefit to all of us.- So consider giving these folks a call sometime and tell them you'd love to see them develop their product to be used on our M-14 engines.-- Can't hur t.- =0A>=0A>Mark =0A>=0A>href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-L ist">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-Listhref="http://forums.ma tronics.com">http://forums.matronics.comhref="http://www.matronics.com ===


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:39:18 AM PST US
    From: "A. Dennis Savarese" <dsavarese0812@bellsouth.net>
    Subject: Re: Recommendation M-14 engines
    Mark, For those engines that have spinners and back plates that cover the timing marks on the M14, the easiest way to check or set the timing is to use this device available from ATS. http://www.aircraft-tool.com/shop/detail.aspx?PRODUCT_ID5 Secure it to the front of the spinner and set the disc to "0" once you get #4 cylinder at TDC. Works just like having the spinner off and seeing the timing marks on the prop flange. A. Dennis Savarese 334-285-6263 334-546-8182 (cell) Skype: Yakguy1 www.yak-52.com On 10/7/2011 8:25 AM, Yak Pilot wrote: > That's an interesting discussion Walt. Basically from what I read, > you are saying in a nutshell that due to piston TDC dwell, the > TIMERITE is not accurate for determining TDC, and I see that logic > perfectly. > You made a comment that "a few" of the M-14P engines use the M9F mag > but most others use mags with auto-advance. That's intesting because > every M-14 that I have worked on use the M9F fixed timing mags. That > includes five M-14P's, and seven M14PF's. From that LESS than broad > experiece I came to the conclusion (which could easily be wrong) that > most M-14P and PF engines that came stock with the YAK-50, YAK-52, > YAK-55, Sukhoi-26,29,31 series came with the M9F mag stock. Those are > the models I have direct experience with, but admittedly only one or > two of each model. I own two YAK-50's (one wrecked) with M-14P > engines, one 1974 model with original engine and one 1984 model with > original engine, both with M9F mags. > That said, I have heard that the mags with mechanical advance will > work equally was well. Dennis, can you add to this? George or Cliff > Coy? What are the usual mag configurations (stock) on M-14's? > You've used this device on an M-14, and I have not. So excuse a > stupid question if I may. If you can determine the total piston dwell > by coming up to the point of no movement (Before TDC) and then where > it starts to move again (after TDC), determine total number of "no > movement degrees" then divide by 2, would you not get a reasonable > point of accuracy for TDC? Just wondering. This problem has > perplexed me for quite some time, as with a spinner on the aircraft, > measuring prop angle is next to impossible, and even with the spinner > off, the spinner backplate also adds to the problem. I have > experimented with laser measuring, with a modicum of success, but > reflection from the piston often refracts and without putting a > reflector on the piston I've given up on that. > So at this point I guess my suggestion to have TIMERITE make arms and > scales for the M-14 might only apply to those that use M9F mags. > Hmmm. > Thanks Walt. > Mark > > *From:* Walter Lannon <wlannon@shaw.ca> > *To:* yak-list@matronics.com > *Sent:* Friday, October 7, 2011 12:16 AM > *Subject:* Re: Yak-List: Recommendation M-14 engines > > Hi Mark > Having already fabricated an arm and scale for my TIMERITE to > accommodate the Ivchenco series engines I can tell you it is barely > worth the effort. > The TIMERITE is an excellent timing device but like any other magneto > timing system that utilizes piston position it becomes increasingly > less accurate as the timing specification approaches TDC. > This of course is a result of piston dwell where the piston is > stationary through an angle of 4 to 5 degs. either side of TDC. In > that area the TIMERITE is totally useless. > Having said that the M14P engine WITH the specified fixed spark M9F > magneto is good candidate for the TIMERITE since the timing angle (and > therefore the setting angle) is 23 degs.(crankshaft) BTDC. > However a few M14P's and (as far as I know) all other variants of the > Ivchenko line utilize the M9, M9-25M or M9-35M. > These of course are all auto advance mags and, varying with engine > model, are timed with setting angles in the area of 10 degs. BTDC to > 10 degs. ATDC and therefore must be timed by direct reference to the > crankshaft (or corresponding prop shaft) angle. > And NO, my arm and scale are not available under any circumstance. > They were just a test for my own personal information. The TIMERITE > is a patented, currently available device and if ATS think there is an > acceptable market they will design and manufacture as necessary. > Cheers; > Walt > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Yak Pilot <mailto:yakplt@yahoo.com> > *To:* yak-list@matronics.com <mailto:yak-list@matronics.com> > *Sent:* Thursday, October 06, 2011 12:41 PM > *Subject:* Yak-List: Recommendation M-14 engines > > This should probably be on the M-14 engine list, (which I will get > around to doing), but for now just a recommendation for every M-14 > engine owner on this list. (Of course this might equally apply > to Housai engines as well! ) > As anyone knows who has timed an M-14, it is not exactly an easy > process and it is very difficult to get dead nuts accurate. > Typically we finish, hope for the best and check mag drop as a > confidence factor. > There are several ways to "do this better" when attempting the > process, but one of the easier ways to time an engine is with the > Aircraft Tool and Supply Company TIMERITE device. This is > actually the same way the Russians attempt it, but with a much > more accurate instrument. > Apparent;ly the TIMERITE timing tool does not have gauge arms and > scales developed for the M-14 engine, which actually is kind of > odd since there are more of these engines in this country flying > than there are some of the older radial engine designs that they > have developed scales for. > One of the ways to influence this is simply to call these folks > up, tell them that you have an M-14, and would like to see them > develop their product so it can be used on YOUR engine. Heck, > it's a toll free call: 1-800-248-0638 > I am not saying there are not better methods than the TIMERITE (A > Laser scale comes to mind), but being able to purchase and use > this instrument on M-14 engines would be of benefit to all of us. > So consider giving these folks a call sometime and tell them you'd > love to see them develop their product to be used on our M-14 > engines. Can't hurt. > Mark > > * > > href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List > href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com > href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c > * > > * > > > * > > > * > > > *


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:00:12 AM PST US
    From: "George Coy" <george.coy@gmail.com>
    Subject: Recommendation M-14 engines
    The M9=E6 magneto with the high voltage type of shower of sparks was pretty much standard for the M14P on Yaks. The M9-35M magneto with the vibrator coil type shower of sparks was pretty much standard on the M14-V26 Kamov engines and M9B engines. Either works equally well. Most Yak 52W and 52TW had the M9-35M magnetos as new production M9=E6 magnetos were not available at the time and new Mp-35m type were available. I use the just a screw driver or awl to feel TDC. It is probably as accurate as the Russian gage or TIMERIGHT. If I cannot get to the propeller flange due to a spinner I use one of the Timing Indicator TP102 Tools (Aircraft spruce 12-01187) and time it to 15 deg BTC (24 deg X .63). From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Yak Pilot Sent: Friday, October 07, 2011 9:25 AM Subject: Re: Yak-List: Recommendation M-14 engines That's an interesting discussion Walt. Basically from what I read, you are saying in a nutshell that due to piston TDC dwell, the TIMERITE is not accurate for determining TDC, and I see that logic perfectly. You made a comment that "a few" of the M-14P engines use the M9F mag but most others use mags with auto-advance. That's intesting because every M-14 that I have worked on use the M9F fixed timing mags. That includes five M-14P's, and seven M14PF's. From that LESS than broad experiece I came to the conclusion (which could easily be wrong) that most M-14P and PF engines that came stock with the YAK-50, YAK-52, YAK-55, Sukhoi-26,29,31 series came with the M9F mag stock. Those are the models I have direct experience with, but admittedly only one or two of each model. I own two YAK-50's (one wrecked) with M-14P engines, one 1974 model with original engine and one 1984 model with original engine, both with M9F mags. That said, I have heard that the mags with mechanical advance will work equally was well. Dennis, can you add to this? George or Cliff Coy? What are the usual mag configurations (stock) on M-14's? You've used this device on an M-14, and I have not. So excuse a stupid question if I may. If you can determine the total piston dwell by coming up to the point of no movement (Before TDC) and then where it starts to move again (after TDC), determine total number of "no movement degrees" then divide by 2, would you not get a reasonable point of accuracy for TDC? Just wondering. This problem has perplexed me for quite some time, as with a spinner on the aircraft, measuring prop angle is next to impossible, and even with the spinner off, the spinner backplate also adds to the problem. I have experimented with laser measuring, with a modicum of success, but reflection from the piston often refracts and without putting a reflector on the piston I've given up on that. So at this point I guess my suggestion to have TIMERITE make arms and scales for the M-14 might only apply to those that use M9F mags. Hmmm. Thanks Walt. Mark From: Walter Lannon <wlannon@shaw.ca> Sent: Friday, October 7, 2011 12:16 AM Subject: Re: Yak-List: Recommendation M-14 engines Hi Mark Having already fabricated an arm and scale for my TIMERITE to accommodate the Ivchenco series engines I can tell you it is barely worth the effort. The TIMERITE is an excellent timing device but like any other magneto timing system that utilizes piston position it becomes increasingly less accurate as the timing specification approaches TDC. This of course is a result of piston dwell where the piston is stationary through an angle of 4 to 5 degs. either side of TDC. In that area the TIMERITE is totally useless. Having said that the M14P engine WITH the specified fixed spark M9F magneto is good candidate for the TIMERITE since the timing angle (and therefore the setting angle) is 23 degs.(crankshaft) BTDC. However a few M14P's and (as far as I know) all other variants of the Ivchenko line utilize the M9, M9-25M or M9-35M. These of course are all auto advance mags and, varying with engine model, are timed with setting angles in the area of 10 degs. BTDC to 10 degs. ATDC and therefore must be timed by direct reference to the crankshaft (or corresponding prop shaft) angle. And NO, my arm and scale are not available under any circumstance. They were just a test for my own personal information. The TIMERITE is a patented, currently available device and if ATS think there is an acceptable market they will design and manufacture as necessary. Cheers; Walt ----- Original Message ----- From: Yak Pilot <mailto:yakplt@yahoo.com> Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2011 12:41 PM Subject: Yak-List: Recommendation M-14 engines This should probably be on the M-14 engine list, (which I will get around to doing), but for now just a recommendation for every M-14 engine owner on this list. (Of course this might equally apply to Housai engines as well! ) As anyone knows who has timed an M-14, it is not exactly an easy process and it is very difficult to get dead nuts accurate. Typically we finish, hope for the best and check mag drop as a confidence factor. There are several ways to "do this better" when attempting the process, but one of the easier ways to time an engine is with the Aircraft Tool and Supply Company TIMERITE device. This is actually the same way the Russians attempt it, but with a much more accurate instrument. Apparent;ly the TIMERITE timing tool does not have gauge arms and scales developed for the M-14 engine, which actually is kind of odd since there are more of these engines in this country flying than there are some of the older radial engine designs that they have developed scales for. One of the ways to influence this is simply to call these folks up, tell them that you have an M-14, and would like to see them develop their product so it can be used on YOUR engine. Heck, it's a toll free call: 1-800-248-0638 I am not saying there are not better methods than the TIMERITE (A Laser scale comes to mind), but being able to purchase and use this instrument on M-14 engines would be of benefit to all of us. So consider giving these folks a call sometime and tell them you'd love to see them develop their product to be used on our M-14 engines. Can't hurt. Mark href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List">http://www.matronics .com/ Navigator?Yak-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:49:39 AM PST US
    From: "Walter Lannon" <wlannon@shaw.ca>
    Subject: Re: Recommendation M-14 engines
    No Mark that is NOT what I wrote! I wrote " A few M14P's and all other variants of the Ivchenko line utilize the M9, M9-25M or M9-35M" And yes you have appeared to miss the point entirely. The TIMERITE is not a TDC indicating tool. It is, as the name implies, a timing too. One establishes the TDC reference by simply setting the adjustable scale to "0" after positioning the piston at the top of it's compression stroke. Whether the crank is precisely at "0" degs is totally irrelevant to the process. The TIMERITE measures piston position relative to the TDC position of the PISTON and displays that position as a function of crankshaft rotation. You are correct the TIMERITE is of use ONLY with the M9F magneto. ----- Original Message ----- From: Yak Pilot To: yak-list@matronics.com Sent: Friday, October 07, 2011 6:25 AM Subject: Re: Yak-List: Recommendation M-14 engines That's an interesting discussion Walt. Basically from what I read, you are saying in a nutshell that due to piston TDC dwell, the TIMERITE is not accurate for determining TDC, and I see that logic perfectly. You made a comment that "a few" of the M-14P engines use the M9F mag but most others use mags with auto-advance. That's intesting because every M-14 that I have worked on use the M9F fixed timing mags. That includes five M-14P's, and seven M14PF's. From that LESS than broad experiece I came to the conclusion (which could easily be wrong) that most M-14P and PF engines that came stock with the YAK-50, YAK-52, YAK-55, Sukhoi-26,29,31 series came with the M9F mag stock. Those are the models I have direct experience with, but admittedly only one or two of each model. I own two YAK-50's (one wrecked) with M-14P engines, one 1974 model with original engine and one 1984 model with original engine, both with M9F mags. That said, I have heard that the mags with mechanical advance will work equally was well. Dennis, can you add to this? George or Cliff Coy? What are the usual mag configurations (stock) on M-14's? You've used this device on an M-14, and I have not. So excuse a stupid question if I may. If you can determine the total piston dwell by coming up to the point of no movement (Before TDC) and then where it starts to move again (after TDC), determine total number of "no movement degrees" then divide by 2, would you not get a reasonable point of accuracy for TDC? Just wondering. This problem has perplexed me for quite some time, as with a spinner on the aircraft, measuring prop angle is next to impossible, and even with the spinner off, the spinner backplate also adds to the problem. I have experimented with laser measuring, with a modicum of success, but reflection from the piston often refracts and without putting a reflector on the piston I've given up on that. So at this point I guess my suggestion to have TIMERITE make arms and scales for the M-14 might only apply to those that use M9F mags. Hmmm. Thanks Walt. Mark From: Walter Lannon <wlannon@shaw.ca> To: yak-list@matronics.com Sent: Friday, October 7, 2011 12:16 AM Subject: Re: Yak-List: Recommendation M-14 engines Hi Mark Having already fabricated an arm and scale for my TIMERITE to accommodate the Ivchenco series engines I can tell you it is barely worth the effort. The TIMERITE is an excellent timing device but like any other magneto timing system that utilizes piston position it becomes increasingly less accurate as the timing specification approaches TDC. This of course is a result of piston dwell where the piston is stationary through an angle of 4 to 5 degs. either side of TDC. In that area the TIMERITE is totally useless. Having said that the M14P engine WITH the specified fixed spark M9F magneto is good candidate for the TIMERITE since the timing angle (and therefore the setting angle) is 23 degs.(crankshaft) BTDC. However a few M14P's and (as far as I know) all other variants of the Ivchenko line utilize the M9, M9-25M or M9-35M. These of course are all auto advance mags and, varying with engine model, are timed with setting angles in the area of 10 degs. BTDC to 10 degs. ATDC and therefore must be timed by direct reference to the crankshaft (or corresponding prop shaft) angle. And NO, my arm and scale are not available under any circumstance. They were just a test for my own personal information. The TIMERITE is a patented, currently available device and if ATS think there is an acceptable market they will design and manufacture as necessary. Cheers; Walt ----- Original Message ----- From: Yak Pilot To: yak-list@matronics.com Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2011 12:41 PM Subject: Yak-List: Recommendation M-14 engines This should probably be on the M-14 engine list, (which I will get around to doing), but for now just a recommendation for every M-14 engine owner on this list. (Of course this might equally apply to Housai engines as well! ) As anyone knows who has timed an M-14, it is not exactly an easy process and it is very difficult to get dead nuts accurate. Typically we finish, hope for the best and check mag drop as a confidence factor. There are several ways to "do this better" when attempting the process, but one of the easier ways to time an engine is with the Aircraft Tool and Supply Company TIMERITE device. This is actually the same way the Russians attempt it, but with a much more accurate instrument. Apparent;ly the TIMERITE timing tool does not have gauge arms and scales developed for the M-14 engine, which actually is kind of odd since there are more of these engines in this country flying than there are some of the older radial engine designs that they have developed scales for. One of the ways to influence this is simply to call these folks up, tell them that you have an M-14, and would like to see them develop their product so it can be used on YOUR engine. Heck, it's a toll free call: 1-800-248-0638 I am not saying there are not better methods than the TIMERITE (A Laser scale comes to mind), but being able to purchase and use this instrument on M-14 engines would be of benefit to all of us. So consider giving these folks a call sometime and tell them you'd love to see them develop their product to be used on our M-14 engines. Can't hurt. Mark href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List">http://www.matronics .com/Navigator?Yak-List href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:23:06 AM PST US
    From: Yak Pilot <yakplt@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: Recommendation M-14 engines
    WALT!- Sorry, if I-misunderstood and missed the point entirely=0A-=0A So, if I understand it now, most of the M-14P and PF engines came with the M9F mag, and thus the TIMERITE device will be of use to them.--Got it. =0A-=0AI think that was what I was trying to say from the gitgo, but.... whatever.--..... thanks.=0A-=0AMags that use mechanical advance requi re the set timing point to be set very close to TDC, which is hard to deter mine with the TIMERITE due to piston dwell.- For example, a mechanical ad vance M9-35M mag with 35 stamped on it, would have a set point of seven deg rees past top dead center of crankshaft angle, which would be difficult to determine with the TIMERITE.-- Would you agree that I understand the po int now?- Thanks.- =0A-=0AThe only thing I was suggesting was that th e TIMERITE would be a nice thing to have on M-14 engines.- Since most M-1 4 engines use the M9F mag, I guess we are in agreement on that point.- =0A-=0ASo, if you have an M9F mag on an M-14 engine, please give those fo lks a call if you would.- It's always nice to have another option, even t hough it appears that the E25 timing indicator might be a better way to go. - =0A-=0ASorry for misreading what you wrote Walt.- It was not meant to upset you.- =0A-=0AMark=0A-=0A-=0A-=0A-=0A-=0A=0AFrom: Wal ter Lannon <wlannon@shaw.ca>=0ATo: yak-list@matronics.com=0ASent: Friday, O ctober 7, 2011 12:47 PM=0ASubject: Re: Yak-List: Recommendation M-14 engine s=0A=0A=0ANo Mark that is NOT what I wrote!=0A-=0AI wrote " A few M14P's -and all other variants of the Ivchenko line-utilize the M9, M9-25M or M9-35M"=0A-=0AAnd yes you have appeared to miss the point entirely.- Th e TIMERITE is not a TDC indicating tool. -It is, as the name implies, a t iming too.=0A-=0AOne establishes the TDC reference by simply setting the adjustable scale to "0" after positioning the piston at the top of it's com pression stroke.- Whether the crank is precisely at "0" degs is totally i rrelevant to the process.- The-TIMERITE measures-piston position-re lative to the TDC position of the PISTON and displays that position as a fu nction of crankshaft rotation.=0A-=0AYou are correct the TIMERITE is of u se ONLY with the M9F magneto.--=0A----- Original Message ----- =0A>From : Yak Pilot =0A>To: yak-list@matronics.com =0A>Sent: Friday, October 07, 20 11 6:25 AM=0A>Subject: Re: Yak-List: Recommendation M-14 engines=0A>=0A>=0A >That's an interesting discussion Walt.- Basically from what I read, you are saying in a nutshell that due to piston TDC dwell, the TIMERITE is not accurate for determining TDC, and I see that logic perfectly.- =0A>-=0A >You made a comment that "a few" of the M-14P engines use the M9F mag but m ost others use mags with auto-advance.--That's intesting because every M-14 that I have worked on use the M9F fixed timing mags.- That includes five M-14P's, and seven M14PF's.- From that LESS than broad experiece I c ame to the conclusion (which could easily be wrong) that most M-14P and PF engines that came stock with the YAK-50, YAK-52, YAK-55, Sukhoi-26,29,31 se ries came with the M9F mag stock.- Those are the models I have direct exp erience with, but admittedly only one or two of each model.- I own two YA K-50's (one wrecked) with M-14P engines, one 1974 model with original engin e and one 1984- model with original engine, both with M9F mags.- =0A> -=0A>That said, I have heard that the mags with mechanical advance will w ork equally was well.- Dennis, can you add to this?- George or Cliff Co y?- What are the usual mag configurations (stock) on M-14's?- =0A>- =0A>You've used this device on an M-14, and I have not.- So excuse a stup id question if I may.- If you can determine the total piston dwell by com ing up to the point of no movement (Before TDC) and then where it starts to move again (after TDC), determine total number of "no movement degrees" th en divide by 2, would you not get a reasonable point of accuracy for TDC? - Just wondering.- This problem has perplexed me for quite some time, a s with a spinner on the aircraft, measuring prop angle is next to impossibl e, and even with the spinner off, the spinner backplate also adds to the pr oblem.- I have experimented with laser measuring, with a modicum of succe ss, but reflection from the piston often refracts and- without putting a reflector on the piston I've given up on that.- =0A>-=0A>So at this poi nt I guess my suggestion to have TIMERITE make arms and scales for the M-14 might only apply to those that use M9F mags.- =0A>-=0A>Hmmm.- =0A> -=0A>Thanks Walt. =0A>-=0A>Mark=0A>-=0A>=0A>=0A>From: Walter Lannon < wlannon@shaw.ca>=0A>To: yak-list@matronics.com=0A>Sent: Friday, October 7, 2011 12:16 AM=0A>Subject: Re: Yak-List: Recommendation M-14 engines=0A>=0A> =0A>Hi Mark=0A>-=0A>Having already-fabricated an arm and scale for my -TIMERITE to accommodate the Ivchenco series engines I can tell you it is barely worth the effort.=0A>-=0A>The-TIMERITE is an excellent timing d evice but like any other magneto timing system that-utilizes piston posit ion it becomes increasingly less accurate as the timing specification appro aches TDC.=0A>-=0A>This of course is a result of piston dwell where the p iston is stationary-through an-angle of- 4 to 5 degs. either side of TDC.- In that area the TIMERITE is totally useless.=0A>-=0A>Having said that the M14P engine-WITH the specified fixed spark M9F magneto is-goo d candidate for the TIMERITE since the timing angle (and therefore the sett ing angle) is 23 degs.(crankshaft) BTDC.=0A>-=0A>However a few M14P's and (as far as I know) all other variants of the Ivchenko line utilize the M9, M9-25M or M9-35M.- =0A>These of course are all auto advance mags and, va rying with engine model,-are timed with setting angles in the area of-1 0 degs. BTDC to 10 degs. ATDC-and therefore must be timed by direct refer ence to the crankshaft (or corresponding prop shaft) angle.=0A>-=0A>And N O, my arm and scale are not available under any circumstance.- They were just a test for my own personal-information.- The TIMERITE is a patente d, currently available device and if ATS think there is an acceptable marke t they will design and manufacture as necessary.=0A>-=0A>Cheers; =0A>Walt - =0A>=0A>-=0A>----- Original Message ----- =0A>>From: Yak Pilot =0A>>T o: yak-list@matronics.com =0A>>Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2011 12:41 PM=0A >>Subject: Yak-List: Recommendation M-14 engines=0A>>=0A>>=0A>>This should probably be on the M-14 engine list, (which I will get around to doing), bu t for now just a recommendation for every M-14 engine owner on this list. - (Of course this might-equally apply to-Housai engines as well!-) =0A>>=0A>>As anyone knows who has timed an M-14, it is not exactly an easy process and it is very difficult to get dead nuts accurate.- Typically we finish, hope for the best and check mag drop as a confidence factor.- =0A>>=0A>>There are several ways to "do this better" when attempting the pr ocess, but one of the easier ways to time an engine is with the Aircraft To ol and Supply Company TIMERITE device.- This is actually the same way the Russians attempt it, but with a much more accurate instrument.- =0A>>=0A >>Apparent;ly the TIMERITE timing tool does not have gauge arms and scales developed for the M-14 engine, which actually is kind of odd since there ar e more of these engines in this country flying than there are some of the o lder radial engine designs that they have developed scales for. =0A>>=0A>>O ne of the ways to influence this is simply to call these folks up, tell the m that you have an M-14, and would like to see them develop their product s o it can be used on YOUR engine.- Heck, it's a toll free call:- 1-800-2 48-0638- =0A>>=0A>>I am not saying there are not better methods than the TIMERITE (A Laser scale comes to mind), but being able to purchase and use this instrument on M-14 engines would be of benefit to all of us.- So con sider giving these folks a call sometime and tell them you'd love to see th em develop their product to be used on our M-14 engines.-- Can't hurt. - =0A>>=0A>>Mark =0A>>=0A>>href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak -List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-Listhref="http://forums. matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.comhref="http://www.matronics.c om/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c =0A>=0A>=0A>href="http://www. matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-Li sthref="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.comhre f="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c =0A_ -======================== =============


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:43:47 AM PST US
    From: Mark Schrick <schrick@pacbell.net>
    Subject: Re:8
    .. http://lalimpiezadegraffitis.com/dfijleoiw.html?ulinkFriend=7xit2


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:16:40 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Recommendation M-14 engines
    From: "mikspin" <acromike@gmail.com>
    http://buy1.snapon.com/catalog/item.asp?search=true&item_ID=75273&PartNo=YAL866&group_id=19865&supersede=&store=snapon-store&tool=all This tool makes it possible to time the mags, regardless of model, accurately and consistently, regardless of a spinner, backing plate etc. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354298#354298


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:38:53 AM PST US
    From: Yak Pilot <yakplt@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: Recommendation M-14 engines
    I respectfully disagree, but that's nothing new. Mark From: mikspin <acromike@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, October 7, 2011 2:14 PM Subject: Yak-List: Re: Recommendation M-14 engines http://buy1.snapon.com/catalog/item.asp?search=true&item_ID=75273&PartNo=YAL866&group_id=19865&supersede=&store=snapon-store&tool=all This tool makes it possible to time the mags, regardless of model, accurately and consistently, regardless of a spinner, backing plate etc. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354298#354298


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:07:28 PM PST US
    From: "A. Dennis Savarese" <dsavarese0812@bellsouth.net>
    Subject: Re: Recommendation M-14 engines
    I think what was mean was the tool makes it possible to find TDC. I have one that I use all the time to find TDC and it works fine. Had to make one small modification though because when the tool is screwed into the spark plug hole properly, the moveable section will jam or bind on the sleeve because of the angle between the moveable section and the piston. All I did was put a VERY slight bend in the moveable section which changed the angle just enough to permit it to move up and down easily. Dennis A. Dennis Savarese 334-285-6263 334-546-8182 (cell) Skype: Yakguy1 www.yak-52.com On 10/7/2011 1:35 PM, Yak Pilot wrote: > --> Yak-List message posted by: Yak Pilot<yakplt@yahoo.com> > > I respectfully disagree, but that's nothing new. > > Mark > > > From: mikspin<acromike@gmail.com> > To: yak-list@matronics.com > Sent: Friday, October 7, 2011 2:14 PM > Subject: Yak-List: Re: Recommendation M-14 engines > > --> Yak-List message posted by: "mikspin"<acromike@gmail.com> > > http://buy1.snapon.com/catalog/item.asp?search=true&item_ID=75273&PartNo=YAL866&group_id=19865&supersede=&store=snapon-store&tool=all > > This tool makes it possible to time the mags, regardless of model, accurately and consistently, regardless of a spinner, backing plate etc. > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354298#354298 > >


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:29:29 PM PST US
    Subject: Re:8
    From: doug sapp <dougsappllc@gmail.com>
    Mark, What is this? Doug On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Mark Schrick <schrick@pacbell.net> wrote: > > .. http://lalimpiezadegraffitis.com/dfijleoiw.html?ulinkFriend=7xit2 > >


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:37:16 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Recommendation M-14 engines
    From: "mikspin" <acromike@gmail.com>
    Yep Dennis that's the case and thank you. I should have further stated that you need a pointer (or the Aircraft Spruce tool mentioned) along with this TDC finder. The marki ngson the tool allow you to easily bracket the dwell at TDC. I use a pointer as described in the Yak mx manual and have timed -9F and -35's without issue. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354306#354306


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:06:44 PM PST US
    From: Didier Blouzard <didier.blouzard@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Recommendation M-14 engines
    Hi gents excuse me but I perhaps missed something, but why not use the TDC tool provided in the original russian tools??? Or even try to reproduce it ??? If this is a good solution???? I have one but I don't have the knowledge to use it. One day perhaps. Sorry for this stupid question but ... Thanks and best regards Didier 2011/10/7 mikspin <acromike@gmail.com> > > Yep Dennis that's the case and thank you. > > I should have further stated that you need a pointer (or the Aircraft > Spruce tool mentioned) along with this TDC finder. The marki ngson the tool > allow you to easily bracket the dwell at TDC. I use a pointer as described > in the Yak mx manual and have timed -9F and -35's without issue. > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354306#354306 > > -- ____________________________ Didier BLOUZARD Portable : +33 6 24 24 36 72 Email: didier.blouzard@gmail.com <didier.blouzard@anolistech.fr>


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:07:52 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Recommendation M-14 engines
    From: Elmar Hegenauer <samira.h@shaw.ca>
    There is always a hard or an easy way to solve a problem. I personally prefer the easy method and set my magneto timing by using a chopstick, a bendable ruler and a household elastic. And no, I will not interfere with the pros of the list and leave you with that hint. cheers Elmar


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:58:30 PM PST US
    From: "A. Dennis Savarese" <dsavarese0812@bellsouth.net>
    Subject: Re: Recommendation M-14 engines
    I have had 2 bad experiences with the original Russian TDC tool. In each case the "hook" jammed in the horizontal position and I could not release it. Twice I had to use a Dremel tool cutting wheel to cut the mechanism above the spark plug hole and pray the center section with the hook would not drop into the cylinder. I was lucky twice. Needless to say I am not going to try for 3 times. So I refuse to use it under any circumstances. The problem is the quality of the manufacturing regarding the hook and arm that slides in and out of the section that screws into the spark plug hole. If it jams and you can't release it so the hook points straight up and down, your screwed. Use at your own risk! Dennis A. Dennis Savarese 334-285-6263 334-546-8182 (cell) Skype: Yakguy1 www.yak-52.com On 10/7/2011 3:03 PM, Didier Blouzard wrote: > Hi gents > > excuse me but I perhaps missed something, but why not use the TDC tool > provided in the original russian tools??? > Or even try to reproduce it ??? > If this is a good solution???? > > I have one but I don't have the knowledge to use it. One day perhaps. > > Sorry for this stupid question but ... > > Thanks and best regards > > Didier > > 2011/10/7 mikspin <acromike@gmail.com <mailto:acromike@gmail.com>> > > <mailto:acromike@gmail.com>> > > Yep Dennis that's the case and thank you. > > I should have further stated that you need a pointer (or the > Aircraft Spruce tool mentioned) along with this TDC finder. The > marki ngson the tool allow you to easily bracket the dwell at TDC. > I use a pointer as described in the Yak mx manual and have timed > -9F and -35's without issue. > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354306#354306 > > > ========== > rget="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List > ========== > http://forums.matronics.com > ========== > le, List Admin. > ="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution > ========== > > > -- > ____________________________ > Didier BLOUZARD > Portable : +33 6 24 24 36 72 > Email: didier.blouzard@gmail.com <mailto:didier.blouzard@anolistech.fr> > > * > > > *


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:04:59 PM PST US
    From: "A. Dennis Savarese" <dsavarese0812@bellsouth.net>
    Subject: Re: Recommendation M-14 engines
    For those that don't want to pay the Snap On prices, here's the exact same tool for under $20. http://www.amazon.com/Innovative-Products-America-7880-Indicator/dp/B002XMOMA2 A. Dennis Savarese 334-285-6263 334-546-8182 (cell) Skype: Yakguy1 www.yak-52.com On 10/7/2011 4:55 PM, A. Dennis Savarese wrote: > <dsavarese0812@bellsouth.net> > > I have had 2 bad experiences with the original Russian TDC tool. In > each case the "hook" jammed in the horizontal position and I could not > release it. Twice I had to use a Dremel tool cutting wheel to cut the > mechanism above the spark plug hole and pray the center section with > the hook would not drop into the cylinder. I was lucky twice. > Needless to say I am not going to try for 3 times. So I refuse to use > it under any circumstances. > > The problem is the quality of the manufacturing regarding the hook and > arm that slides in and out of the section that screws into the spark > plug hole. If it jams and you can't release it so the hook points > straight up and down, your screwed. > > Use at your own risk! > Dennis > > A. Dennis Savarese > 334-285-6263 > 334-546-8182 (cell) > Skype: Yakguy1 > www.yak-52.com > > > On 10/7/2011 3:03 PM, Didier Blouzard wrote: >> Hi gents >> >> excuse me but I perhaps missed something, but why not use the TDC >> tool provided in the original russian tools??? >> Or even try to reproduce it ??? >> If this is a good solution???? >> >> I have one but I don't have the knowledge to use it. One day perhaps. >> >> Sorry for this stupid question but ... >> >> Thanks and best regards >> >> Didier >> >> 2011/10/7 mikspin <acromike@gmail.com <mailto:acromike@gmail.com>> >> >> <mailto:acromike@gmail.com>> >> >> Yep Dennis that's the case and thank you. >> >> I should have further stated that you need a pointer (or the >> Aircraft Spruce tool mentioned) along with this TDC finder. The >> marki ngson the tool allow you to easily bracket the dwell at TDC. >> I use a pointer as described in the Yak mx manual and have timed >> -9F and -35's without issue. >> >> >> >> >> Read this topic online here: >> >> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354306#354306 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ========== >> rget="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List >> ========== >> http://forums.matronics.com >> ========== >> le, List Admin. >> ="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution >> ========== >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> ____________________________ >> Didier BLOUZARD >> Portable : +33 6 24 24 36 72 >> Email: didier.blouzard@gmail.com <mailto:didier.blouzard@anolistech.fr> >> >> * >> >> >> * > >


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:54:47 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Recommendation M-14 engines
    From: Elmar Hegenauer <samira.h@shaw.ca>
    Dennis, if you put an o-ring in the upper part of the original TDC tool it will not turn accidentally and save you the headache. If you like I could send you a picture. cheers Elmar


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:59:31 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Electric Fuel Pump
    From: Paul Lewis <okanoganlew@gmail.com>
    Hi Barry, this is not one of your kits. Thanks for the info. Paul On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 9:16 PM, barryhancock <bhancock@worldwidewarbirds.com > wrote: > bhancock@worldwidewarbirds.com> > > Hi Paul, > > You need to keep the check valve in the system. Paul, is this our kit? We > should have included installation instructions... If not, I will email them > to you. > > Happy Flying, > > Barry > > -------- > Barry Hancock > Worldwide Warbirds, Inc. > (909) 606-4444 > www.worldwidewarbirds.com > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354160#354160 > >


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:56:26 PM PST US
    Subject: Worldwide Warbirds alive and well!
    From: "barryhancock" <bhancock@worldwidewarbirds.com>
    Gang, It has come to my attention that there is some misunderstanding in the community about the disposition of Worldwide Warbirds, Inc. I want to take a minute to tell you that we are still here and happily engaged, albeit in slightly different form and locale. We have relocated to Springville, UT (approx. 40 miles south of Salt Lake City) and offer the following services: 1) Aircraft Brokering. Whether looking to buy or sell an aircraft, we can assist you in your efforts. We have well established programs for both sellers and buyers looking in to the CJ/Yak/jet warbird market. With the closing of our restoration and maintenance business, one of our primary focuses is growing our efforts in these areas. Over Red Star 30 aircraft sold.... 2) Parts support. We have developed many useful upgrades to the CJ over the years and are still producing these kits including: ignition harnesses, exhaust systems, intake drain kits, rudder pedal mods, custom brake handles and stick grip adapters, refurbished gauges, canopy glass including our exclusive one piece rear canopy, electric prime/boost pump, strut adapters, and more. Many of these kits took extensive time to develop and have parts machined, etc. We wanted to put out the best quality kits on the market and do things right to enhance safety and ease of use. Most of the above we have in stock ready to ship. 3) Pre-purchase inspection and test flight services. We will travel anywhere in the country and put our years of CJ restoration, maintenance and flying experience to good use for you when looking to buy a CJ/Yak/L-29/39, etc. 4) Pilot services. If you need a plane delivered anywhere in the US, we will do it. Pre-purchase test flights, post restoration first flights, transition checkouts, aerobatic critiques, etc. Fees are daily plus expenses. 5) Divorce counseling. All personal experience aside, I'm just kidding. 6) Demo flights. If you've never flown a CJ, we're happy to take you up in "Panda Monium" one of the most highly restored and modern CJs in existence. With over 1000 hrs. in CJs and Yaks, we'll show you every corner of the envelope and get it all on our 4 camera HD video system. 7) Speaking of video systems, we are authorized dealers for the following: Data Toys video systems, Dynon Avionics, Zaon Flight Systems, Advanced Flight Systems, and Strong Parachutes. Get a Red Star discount on any of these systems plus installation tips from us. So, there you have it. Like the ad I used to run when I was a radio talk show host said "tell your friends and spread the word, because our advertising budget sucks!" Happy Flying, Barry -------- Barry Hancock Worldwide Warbirds, Inc. (909) 606-4444 www.worldwidewarbirds.com Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=354348#354348




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   yak-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Yak-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/yak-list
  • Browse Yak-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/yak-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --