Yak-List Digest Archive

Fri 04/06/12


Total Messages Posted: 9



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 06:00 AM - Re: Sad day at Breckenridge TX (Bill Geipel)
     2. 06:44 AM - Re: Sad day at Breckenridge TX (John Fischer)
     3. 09:20 AM - Re: Sad day at Breckenridge TX (Brian Lloyd)
     4. 09:25 AM - Re: Sad day at Breckenridge TX (Brian Lloyd)
     5. 12:11 PM - Re: Sad day at Breckenridge TX (Bitterlich, Mark G CIV Det Cherry Point, MALS-14 64E)
     6. 12:44 PM - Re: Sad day at Breckenridge TX (Bitterlich, Mark G CIV Det Cherry Point, MALS-14 64E)
     7. 01:08 PM - Re: Sad day at Breckenridge TX (Richard Hess)
     8. 01:18 PM - M-14P available (Cpayne)
     9. 09:45 PM - Tragic loss in Tx (Roger Kemp M.D.)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:00:50 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Sad day at Breckenridge TX
    From: Bill Geipel <czech6@mesanetworks.net>
    Really Brian ? U r actually trying to defend yourself? Let's all just let this one go. Brian knows this is a no win argument, none w ill agree with him. Bill On Apr 5, 2012, at 8:09 PM, Brian Lloyd <brian@lloyd.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Bitterlich, Mark G CIV Det Cherry Point, M ALS-14 64E <mark.bitterlich@navy.mil> wrote: > He sure has my admiration. I am sorry that you are angered by the > thought that he not only killed himself, but destroyed an irreplaceable > aircraft Brian, but I have this nagging feeling that he really didn't > much care what your opinion was in the matter, and I have to admit, > neither do I. > > Whether you or he care for my opinion doesn't change the facts. The airpla ne and the laws of physics don't care about anyone's opinion. But three thin gs are for sure: he's dead, the airplane is destroyed, and it didn't have to happen. > > There are so many things we HAVE to risk when we fly: weather, mechanical f ailure, momentary lapses of skill, and plain old bad luck. We don't need to i ntentionally make it worse. We stay alive and give aviation a good name by e xercising GOOD judgement. > > Some people really live life to the fullest, and that > oftentimes means doing things that others consider careless, reckless, > or dangerous. One of the greatest freedoms we can have in this country > is to make those decisions ourselves, although it is well known that > there will ALWAYS be those with 20/20 hindsight. > > Oh, bullshit Mark. There is no 20/20 hindsight in this. We all know that d oing a roll on takeoff is both stupid and unnecessary. There is little quest ion in my mind that I could pull it off too ... until I don't. But it is an u nnecessary risk that gains no one anything ... well, actually, we see what i t gains. > > The bottom line Mark is that there was no need. He was one hell of a Good O l' Boy but he did something stupid, killed himself, and destroyed an irrepla ceable aircraft. All he had to do was choose to exercise good judgement and w e would still be enjoying his company and enjoying that aircraft. But he cho se to exercise poor judgement. Period. That's is an irrefutable fact. > > Spin it however you want. Get pissed off at me for telling it like it is. B ut let me repeat what I said above because what I am saying is 100% true: > He is dead. > The airplane is destroyed. > It didn't have to happen. > -- > Brian Lloyd, WB6RQN/J79BPL > 3191 Western Dr. > Cameron Park, CA 95682 > brian@lloyd.com > +1.767.617.1365 (Dominica) > +1.916.877.5067 (USA) > > > ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= >


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:44:36 AM PST US
    From: John Fischer <fish@aviation-tech.com>
    Subject: Re: Sad day at Breckenridge TX
    Group, First off, I would like to offer my condolences to Mr. Pardue's family and friends. I have seen him many times, at the Reno Air Races I have attended over the last 15+ years. While we do not know what actually happened to Mr. Pardue (mechanical, medical, mistake, ect...), and will probably never know, there are still lessons to be learned. One lesson, is are low level aerobatics unnecessary (if practicing for an airshow/or performing at one, with precautions, yes: if not, no!). If we are going to be able to continue enjoying our aircraft (Yaks, Warbirds, ect....), we must learn from the mistakes of others and not make the same mistakes. Once upon a time there was someone on this form that did low level aerobatics in their Yak-52. His attitude was, it is my aircraft, and I will do as I please! How would you feel if he crashed and made the local public mad, causing your local airport to close? (it has happened) The FAA limited your rights to fly (that was how we got the 300/600 mile limits imposed). This list goes on, and on, and on...... As a flight engineer on C-130's, there are several times, I had to stop the pilots from performing unauthorized (and non briefed), maneuvers! While there are risk involved in aviation, hopefully we are all taking action to mitigate them on every flight we take. Fly safe John Fischer Yak-52 L-5A PT-19A On 4/6/2012 5:58 AM, Bill Geipel wrote: > Really Brian ? U r actually trying to defend yourself? > Let's all just let this one go. Brian knows this is a no win argument, > none will agree with him. > > > Bill > > > On Apr 5, 2012, at 8:09 PM, Brian Lloyd <brian@lloyd.com > <mailto:brian@lloyd.com>> wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Bitterlich, Mark G CIV Det Cherry >> Point, MALS-14 64E <mark.bitterlich@navy.mil >> <mailto:mark.bitterlich@navy.mil>> wrote: >> >> He sure has my admiration. I am sorry that you are angered by the >> thought that he not only killed himself, but destroyed an >> irreplaceable >> aircraft Brian, but I have this nagging feeling that he really didn't >> much care what your opinion was in the matter, and I have to admit, >> neither do I. >> >> >> Whether you or he care for my opinion doesn't change the facts. The >> airplane and the laws of physics don't care about anyone's opinion. >> But three things are for sure: he's dead, the airplane is destroyed, >> and it didn't have to happen. >> >> There are so many things we HAVE to risk when we fly: weather, >> mechanical failure, momentary lapses of skill, and plain old bad >> luck. We don't need to intentionally make it worse. We stay alive and >> give aviation a good name by exercising GOOD judgement. >> >> Some people really live life to the fullest, and that >> oftentimes means doing things that others consider careless, >> reckless, >> or dangerous. One of the greatest freedoms we can have in this >> country >> is to make those decisions ourselves, although it is well known that >> there will ALWAYS be those with 20/20 hindsight. >> >> >> Oh, bullshit Mark. There is no 20/20 hindsight in this. We all know >> that doing a roll on takeoff is both stupid and unnecessary. There is >> little question in my mind that I could pull it off too ... until I >> don't. But it is an unnecessary risk that gains no one anything ... >> well, actually, we see what it gains. >> >> The bottom line Mark is that there was no need. He was one hell of a >> Good Ol' Boy but he did something stupid, killed himself, and >> destroyed an irreplaceable aircraft. All he had to do was choose to >> exercise good judgement and we would still be enjoying his company >> and enjoying that aircraft. But he chose to exercise poor judgement. >> Period. That's is an irrefutable fact. >> >> Spin it however you want. Get pissed off at me for telling it like it >> is. But let me repeat what I said above because what I am saying is >> 100% true: >> >> * He is dead. >> * The airplane is destroyed. >> * It didn't have to happen. >> >> -- >> Brian Lloyd, WB6RQN/J79BPL >> 3191 Western Dr. >> Cameron Park, CA 95682 >> brian@lloyd.com <mailto:brian@lloyd.com> >> +1.767.617.1365 (Dominica) >> +1.916.877.5067 (USA) >> >> * >> >> >> * > * > > > *


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:20:35 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Sad day at Breckenridge TX
    From: Brian Lloyd <brian@lloyd.com>
    On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Bill Geipel <czech6@mesanetworks.net> wrote: > Really Brian ? U r actually trying to defend yourself? > Let's all just let this one go. Brian knows this is a no win argument, > none will agree with him. > I was going to let this go but I am going to post one more time in the hopes that I reach some of the "less-experienced" readers on this list who are still wondering what this is all about. I am sure he was a good pilot. I am sure he was someone to be admired in the warbird community. And I am sure that *I* am sorry that his family is going to have to cope with his loss and that the warbird community has suffered yet another terrible accident and set-back. And lastly, none of us can change any of that. All we can do that is positive is to learn from it and try to assure the rest of the world that it won't happen again. One of the most difficult things to do in this world is to look at information from an undesired source and sift through it for something useful to learn from. Our own air and naval forces finally learned that one and systematically sought to learn from our enemies. I think that it is safe to say that, right now, the overwhelming view on this list is that I am a callous asshole who values an airplane more than the life of a great man and a great flyer, i.e. "The Enemy." No problem. But now, as professional pilots, many of you with military training, I want you to stop, turn off the emotion, get analytical, and place yourself in the cockpit of that F8F, about 230 degrees into that roll, right when you realize that the nose is already going through the horizon. If you are like me, your very first thought is, "Oh shit." If there was time I suspect that his next two thoughts were, "my family," and finally, "oh hell, I'm gonna wreck this airplane." What I don't think was going through his mind was, "Yee haw, I'm going out doing what I love to do." I suspect that, at that moment, if he could have reset to the beginning of the roll he would have continued straight out to a safer altitude before beginning his aerobatics. But, unlike the sim, there is no reset button in the F8F. Getting back to the analytical process here are some key questions. Was the roll on take-off planned? Was it briefed? Had it been repeatedly practiced at altitude to ensure consistency prior to doing it at low-level? Or was it just an ad-hoc spur-of-the-moment cool thing to do? If you are going to do something ad-hoc remember, attitude, airspeed, and altitude are all your friends. Looks like he ran out of at least two and maybe all three of those. How many times have we heard, "Plan the flight and then fly the plan?" Sure we all know that things come up that will require a change of plan but even then, it is possible to build contingencies into our planning. So, I don't know about the rest of you but I sure am tired of burying people who, frankly, didn't need to be buried yet. When it comes from doing something stupid and unthinking I desperately want to be able to yell at them but we all know nothing can come of that. They're dead. All that remains is to yell at everyone else and say, "See! That is what happens when you aren't thinking and planning!" Hopefully it will keep at least one other person from making a bad decision at least one time. -- Brian Lloyd, WB6RQN/J79BPL 3191 Western Dr. Cameron Park, CA 95682 brian@lloyd.com +1.767.617.1365 (Dominica) +1.916.877.5067 (USA)


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:25:14 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Sad day at Breckenridge TX
    From: Brian Lloyd <brian@lloyd.com>
    On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 6:41 AM, John Fischer <fish@aviation-tech.com> wrote: > ** > While we do not know what actually happened to Mr. Pardue (mechanical, > medical, mistake, ect...), and will probably never know, there are still > lessons to be learned. One lesson, is are low level aerobatics unnecessary > (if practicing for an airshow/or performing at one, with precautions, yes: > if not, no!). > > If we are going to be able to continue enjoying our aircraft (Yaks, > Warbirds, ect....), we must learn from the mistakes of others and not make > the same mistakes. > Thank you Mr. Fischer. I sincerely hope the people on this list who have closed their minds to me are listening to you. -- Brian Lloyd, WB6RQN/J79BPL 3191 Western Dr. Cameron Park, CA 95682 brian@lloyd.com +1.767.617.1365 (Dominica) +1.916.877.5067 (USA)


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:11:29 PM PST US
    Subject: Sad day at Breckenridge TX
    From: "Bitterlich, Mark G CIV Det Cherry Point, MALS-14 64E" <mark.bitterlich@navy.mil>
    Thanks John, I am sure the family and friends of Mr. Pardue will be absolutely delighted at the lessons you have espoused at the cost of his death ... which you know absolutely nothing about. Mark Bitterlich -----Original Message----- From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Fischer Sent: Friday, April 06, 2012 6:42 Subject: Re: Yak-List: Sad day at Breckenridge TX Group, First off, I would like to offer my condolences to Mr. Pardue's family and friends. I have seen him many times, at the Reno Air Races I have attended over the last 15+ years. While we do not know what actually happened to Mr. Pardue (mechanical, medical, mistake, ect...), and will probably never know, there are still lessons to be learned. One lesson, is are low level aerobatics unnecessary (if practicing for an airshow/or performing at one, with precautions, yes: if not, no!). If we are going to be able to continue enjoying our aircraft (Yaks, Warbirds, ect....), we must learn from the mistakes of others and not make the same mistakes. Once upon a time there was someone on this form that did low level aerobatics in their Yak-52. His attitude was, it is my aircraft, and I will do as I please! How would you feel if he crashed and made the local public mad, causing your local airport to close? (it has happened) The FAA limited your rights to fly (that was how we got the 300/600 mile limits imposed). This list goes on, and on, and on...... As a flight engineer on C-130's, there are several times, I had to stop the pilots from performing unauthorized (and non briefed), maneuvers! While there are risk involved in aviation, hopefully we are all taking action to mitigate them on every flight we take. Fly safe John Fischer Yak-52 L-5A PT-19A On 4/6/2012 5:58 AM, Bill Geipel wrote: Really Brian ? U r actually trying to defend yourself? Let's all just let this one go. Brian knows this is a no win argument, none will agree with him. Bill On Apr 5, 2012, at 8:09 PM, Brian Lloyd <brian@lloyd.com> wrote: On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Bitterlich, Mark G CIV Det Cherry Point, MALS-14 64E <mark.bitterlich@navy.mil> wrote: He sure has my admiration. I am sorry that you are angered by the thought that he not only killed himself, but destroyed an irreplaceable aircraft Brian, but I have this nagging feeling that he really didn't much care what your opinion was in the matter, and I have to admit, neither do I. Whether you or he care for my opinion doesn't change the facts. The airplane and the laws of physics don't care about anyone's opinion. But three things are for sure: he's dead, the airplane is destroyed, and it didn't have to happen. There are so many things we HAVE to risk when we fly: weather, mechanical failure, momentary lapses of skill, and plain old bad luck. We don't need to intentionally make it worse. We stay alive and give aviation a good name by exercising GOOD judgement. Some people really live life to the fullest, and that oftentimes means doing things that others consider careless, reckless, or dangerous. One of the greatest freedoms we can have in this country is to make those decisions ourselves, although it is well known that there will ALWAYS be those with 20/20 hindsight. Oh, bullshit Mark. There is no 20/20 hindsight in this. We all know that doing a roll on takeoff is both stupid and unnecessary. There is little question in my mind that I could pull it off too ... until I don't. But it is an unnecessary risk that gains no one anything ... well, actually, we see what it gains. The bottom line Mark is that there was no need. He was one hell of a Good Ol' Boy but he did something stupid, killed himself, and destroyed an irreplaceable aircraft. All he had to do was choose to exercise good judgement and we would still be enjoying his company and enjoying that aircraft. But he chose to exercise poor judgement. Period. That's is an irrefutable fact. Spin it however you want. Get pissed off at me for telling it like it is. But let me repeat what I said above because what I am saying is 100% true: * He is dead. * The airplane is destroyed. * It didn't have to happen. -- Brian Lloyd, WB6RQN/J79BPL 3191 Western Dr. Cameron Park, CA 95682 brian@lloyd.com +1.767.617.1365 (Dominica) +1.916.877.5067 (USA) href="3D%22http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List%22">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List href="3D%22http://forums.matronics.com%22">http://forums.matronics.com href="3D%22http://www.matronics.com/contribution%22">http://www.matronics.com/contribution


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:44:04 PM PST US
    Subject: Sad day at Breckenridge TX
    From: "Bitterlich, Mark G CIV Det Cherry Point, MALS-14 64E" <mark.bitterlich@navy.mil>
    And with that ... I'm out of this thread. More comments from me only worsen the problem. Manners: When did we all lose them? Mark Bitterlich -----Original Message----- From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bitterlich, Mark G CIV Det Cherry Point, MALS-14 64E Sent: Friday, April 06, 2012 12:05 Subject: RE: Yak-List: Sad day at Breckenridge TX Thanks John, I am sure the family and friends of Mr. Pardue will be absolutely delighted at the lessons you have espoused at the cost of his death ... which you know absolutely nothing about. Mark Bitterlich -----Original Message----- From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Fischer Sent: Friday, April 06, 2012 6:42 Subject: Re: Yak-List: Sad day at Breckenridge TX Group, First off, I would like to offer my condolences to Mr. Pardue's family and friends. I have seen him many times, at the Reno Air Races I have attended over the last 15+ years. While we do not know what actually happened to Mr. Pardue (mechanical, medical, mistake, ect...), and will probably never know, there are still lessons to be learned. One lesson, is are low level aerobatics unnecessary (if practicing for an airshow/or performing at one, with precautions, yes: if not, no!). If we are going to be able to continue enjoying our aircraft (Yaks, Warbirds, ect....), we must learn from the mistakes of others and not make the same mistakes. Once upon a time there was someone on this form that did low level aerobatics in their Yak-52. His attitude was, it is my aircraft, and I will do as I please! How would you feel if he crashed and made the local public mad, causing your local airport to close? (it has happened) The FAA limited your rights to fly (that was how we got the 300/600 mile limits imposed). This list goes on, and on, and on...... As a flight engineer on C-130's, there are several times, I had to stop the pilots from performing unauthorized (and non briefed), maneuvers! While there are risk involved in aviation, hopefully we are all taking action to mitigate them on every flight we take. Fly safe John Fischer Yak-52 L-5A PT-19A On 4/6/2012 5:58 AM, Bill Geipel wrote: Really Brian ? U r actually trying to defend yourself? Let's all just let this one go. Brian knows this is a no win argument, none will agree with him. Bill On Apr 5, 2012, at 8:09 PM, Brian Lloyd <brian@lloyd.com> wrote: On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Bitterlich, Mark G CIV Det Cherry Point, MALS-14 64E <mark.bitterlich@navy.mil> wrote: He sure has my admiration. I am sorry that you are angered by the thought that he not only killed himself, but destroyed an irreplaceable aircraft Brian, but I have this nagging feeling that he really didn't much care what your opinion was in the matter, and I have to admit, neither do I. Whether you or he care for my opinion doesn't change the facts. The airplane and the laws of physics don't care about anyone's opinion. But three things are for sure: he's dead, the airplane is destroyed, and it didn't have to happen. There are so many things we HAVE to risk when we fly: weather, mechanical failure, momentary lapses of skill, and plain old bad luck. We don't need to intentionally make it worse. We stay alive and give aviation a good name by exercising GOOD judgement. Some people really live life to the fullest, and that oftentimes means doing things that others consider careless, reckless, or dangerous. One of the greatest freedoms we can have in this country is to make those decisions ourselves, although it is well known that there will ALWAYS be those with 20/20 hindsight. Oh, bullshit Mark. There is no 20/20 hindsight in this. We all know that doing a roll on takeoff is both stupid and unnecessary. There is little question in my mind that I could pull it off too ... until I don't. But it is an unnecessary risk that gains no one anything ... well, actually, we see what it gains. The bottom line Mark is that there was no need. He was one hell of a Good Ol' Boy but he did something stupid, killed himself, and destroyed an irreplaceable aircraft. All he had to do was choose to exercise good judgement and we would still be enjoying his company and enjoying that aircraft. But he chose to exercise poor judgement. Period. That's is an irrefutable fact. Spin it however you want. Get pissed off at me for telling it like it is. But let me repeat what I said above because what I am saying is 100% true: * He is dead. * The airplane is destroyed. * It didn't have to happen. -- Brian Lloyd, WB6RQN/J79BPL 3191 Western Dr. Cameron Park, CA 95682 brian@lloyd.com +1.767.617.1365 (Dominica) +1.916.877.5067 (USA) href="3D%22http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List%22">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List href="3D%22http://forums.matronics.com%22">http://forums.matronics.com href="3D%22http://www.matronics.com/contribution%22">http://www.matronics.com/contribution


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:08:13 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Sad day at Breckenridge TX
    From: Richard Hess <hess737@aol.com>
    Guys, It's a tragedy for sure for his family. Someone else said something today t hat was right up my line of thinking. If there was a medical or mechanical issue then we are all sorry for the loss. If it was an intentional maneuver , then I worry every time that happens because like the F-18 crash today, p eople on the ground can and do get hurt or killed. Military must fly. Warbi rds are not so needed. Our privileges are at risk with every such event. Th at alone is reason enough to be careful and make smart decisions. Happy Easter to all... Richard Hess C 404-964-4885 -----Original Message----- From: Bitterlich, Mark G CIV Det Cherry Point, MALS-14 64E, MALS-14 64E <ma rk.bitterlich@navy.mil> Sent: Fri, Apr 6, 2012 2:44 pm Subject: RE: Yak-List: Sad day at Breckenridge TX ALS-14 64E" <mark.bitterlich@navy.mil> And with that ... I'm out of this thread. More comments from me only worse n the roblem. Manners: When did we all lose them? Mark Bitterlich -----Original Message----- rom: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matr onics.com] n Behalf Of Bitterlich, Mark G CIV Det Cherry Point, MALS-14 64E ent: Friday, April 06, 2012 12:05 o: yak-list@matronics.com ubject: RE: Yak-List: Sad day at Breckenridge TX ALS-14 64E" <mark.bitterlich@navy.mil> Thanks John, I am sure the family and friends of Mr. Pardue will be absolutely delighted at he lessons you have espoused at the cost of his death ... which you know bsolutely nothing about. Mark Bitterlich -----Original Message----- rom: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matr onics.com] n Behalf Of John Fischer ent: Friday, April 06, 2012 6:42 o: yak-list@matronics.com ubject: Re: Yak-List: Sad day at Breckenridge TX Group, First off, I would like to offer my condolences to Mr. Pardue's family and riends. have seen him many times, at the Reno Air Races I have attended over the l ast 5+ years. While we do not know what actually happened to Mr. Pardue (mechanical, medi cal, istake, ect...), and will probably never know, there are still lessons to b e earned. One lesson, is are low level aerobatics unnecessary (if practicing for n airshow/or performing at one, with precautions, yes: if not, no!). If we are going to be able to continue enjoying our aircraft (Yaks, Warbird s, ct....), we must learn from the mistakes of others and not make the same istakes. Once upon a time there was someone on this form that did low level aerobati cs in heir Yak-52. is attitude was, it is my aircraft, and I will do as I please! ow would you feel if he crashed and made the local public mad, causing your ocal airport to close? (it has happened) he FAA limited your rights to fly (that was how we got the 300/600 mile lim its mposed). his list goes on, and on, and on...... As a flight engineer on C-130's, there are several times, I had to stop the ilots from performing unauthorized (and non briefed), maneuvers! hile there are risk involved in aviation, hopefully we are all taking actio n to itigate them on every flight we take. Fly safe ohn Fischer ak-52 -5A T-19A On 4/6/2012 5:58 AM, Bill Geipel wrote: Really Brian ? U r actually trying to defend yourself? Let's all just let this one go. Brian knows this is a no win argument, none ill agree with him. Bill On Apr 5, 2012, at 8:09 PM, Brian Lloyd <brian@lloyd.com> wrote: On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Bitterlich, Mark G CIV Det Cherry Poi nt, ALS-14 64E <mark.bitterlich@navy.mil> wrote: He sure has my admiration. I am sorry that you are angered by the thought that he not only killed himself, but destroyed an irreplaceab le aircraft Brian, but I have this nagging feeling that he really didn't much care what your opinion was in the matter, and I have to admit, neither do I. Whether you or he care for my opinion doesn't change the facts. The airp lane nd the laws of physics don't care about anyone's opinion. But three things are or sure: he's dead, the airplane is destroyed, and it didn't have to happen . There are so many things we HAVE to risk when we fly: weather, mechan ical ailure, momentary lapses of skill, and plain old bad luck. We don't need to ntentionally make it worse. We stay alive and give aviation a good name by xercising GOOD judgement. Some people really live life to the fullest, and that oftentimes means doing things that others consider careless, reckless , or dangerous. One of the greatest freedoms we can have in this count ry is to make those decisions ourselves, although it is well known that there will ALWAYS be those with 20/20 hindsight. Oh, bullshit Mark. There is no 20/20 hindsight in this. We all know that doing roll on takeoff is both stupid and unnecessary. There is little question i n my ind that I could pull it off too ... until I don't. But it is an unnecessar y isk that gains no one anything ... well, actually, we see what it gains. The bottom line Mark is that there was no need. He was one hell of a Good Ol' oy but he did something stupid, killed himself, and destroyed an irreplacea ble ircraft. All he had to do was choose to exercise good judgement and we woul d till be enjoying his company and enjoying that aircraft. But he chose to xercise poor judgement. Period. That's is an irrefutable fact. Spin it however you want. Get pissed off at me for telling it like it is. But et me repeat what I said above because what I am saying is 100% true: *He is dead. *The airplane is destroyed. *It didn't have to happen. -- Brian Lloyd, WB6RQN/J79BPL 3191 Western Dr. Cameron Park, CA 95682 brian@lloyd.com +1.767.617.1365 (Dominica) +1.916.877.5067 (USA) href="3D%22http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List%22">http://www.ma tronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List href="3D%22http://forums.matronics.com%22">http://forums.matronics.com href="3D%22http://www.matronics.com/contribution%22">http://www.matronic s.com/contribution -= - The Yak-List Email Forum - -= Use the Matronics List Features Navigator to browse -= the many List utilities such as List Un/Subscription, -= Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, -= Photoshare, and much much more: - -= --> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List - -======================== -= - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS - -= Same great content also available via the Web Forums! - -= --> http://forums.matronics.com - -======================== -= - List Contribution Web Site - -= Thank you for your generous support! -= -Matt Dralle, List Admin. -= --> http://www.matronics.com/contribution -========================


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:18:41 PM PST US
    From: Cpayne <cpayne@joimail.com>
    Subject: M-14P available
    Due to oil leaking out the exhaust valve guides, I'm in the process of removing my M-14P and stuffing in a Zero since OH "spare". Anyone interested in a good candidate for a custom OH, here is a good core. Has 891.3 hours since new and 695.2 since Russian OH where it came off the dyno at 372HP, I have the logs, Russian and US. This is the engine I ran during the Sun 'n Fun races back in the day, kicked mucho butt. Contact OFF-LIST please and let me know if you are interested. I'll accept fair market value and put a good set of M-9F mags back on. Comes with automotive wire/plugs, Stock ringand shipping legs on a pallet. Craig Payne


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:45:30 PM PST US
    Subject: Tragic loss in Tx
    From: "Roger Kemp M.D." <viperdoc@mindspring.com>
    Having served in and around AF/ANG fighter squadrons for 28 of my 32 1/2 years of service as well as being a Safety Investigation Board member (SIB) on 10 different class A aircraft accidents there is a pat process that takes place over the thirty day investigation process. Every effort is made to respect the family during their time of loss. Saying that however there is also an expected flow of information from the board president to the ACC commander and Safety ( then it was TAC headquarters). An 8 hour report,, a 72 hour report, 7 day, 14 day, 21 day were released for dissemination to the squadrons. The final 30 day report was delivered in person by the board president to the CC of TAC. That report explored all of the aspects of the accident. My point is information flowed to the individual squadrons' safety officers and hence the pilots around the world. Why? To help each squadron and each pilot learn from the facts of the accident ( mistakes and/or correct actions taken by the accident pilot along with any mechanical findings). Human factors and mechanical findings were released. Feelings were checked at the door. The facts were given without editorial comment. An asset and a pilot was lost to injury or was dead so information needed to be released so the squadrons could learn from the mistakes of others. The thing I HATE about the FAA's process is information is seldom released and the damned investigation takes a year to complete. When it is completed one has to filter through tons of minutiae to find an answer. So for now check the touchy feelie PC feelings and state the facts. As it stands right now a F9F is a pile of useless burnt metal after becoming a smoking hole. Did the pilot do a snap roll on take off and auger in? Rumor...Yes I said rumor...says he did. Fact...he is dead and his family is grieving. The other fact is we do not have a clue as to why he boxed. Just rumors. So, shut the F#% up and Wait on the painfully slow bureaucratic FAA to grind their way through this investigation. Maybe this time next year we will have an answer as to why this pilot and aircraft was lost. Bet you thought I was going to blame the dead man didn't you? Not yet! I can only speculate for now so I'll shut the F#% up. Doc Sent from my iPad




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   yak-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Yak-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/yak-list
  • Browse Yak-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/yak-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --