Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 01:07 AM - Re: MOGAS APPROVAL (aerostar6)
2. 01:19 AM - engine mount torque values (Elmar & Manuela Hegenauer)
3. 01:44 AM - Re: engine mount torque values (Elmar & Manuela Hegenauer)
4. 02:07 AM - Re: Re: MOGAS APPROVAL (Richard Goode)
5. 05:26 AM - Re: engine mount torque values (Roger Kemp)
6. 10:46 AM - Re: Re: engine mount torque values (Roger Kemp)
7. 01:02 PM - mogas (Jerry Painter)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: MOGAS APPROVAL |
Richard,
Have you any official russian opinion on using the new UL91 unleaded aviation fuel
now becoming available in the UK?
It is basically 100LL with the TEL removed (or rather not added!), with an octane
of 91, which according to my M14P handbook appears to satisfy the octane requirement.
My question is whether the lack of TEL will lead to detonation problems
at high power.
I know that mogas has been widely used outside of the UK. Aside from ethanol/seal
problems, have there been any associated anecdotal detonation or valve guide
wear problems?
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=371694#371694
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | engine mount torque values |
FWIK the engine mounts are not tightened
by torque but rather by measurement, please
see attached picture.
BTW Viperdoc, in the past I have sent you
several times documents regarding some
of your questions on the list but all my emails
bounced, guess you have blocked me - tough luck :-)
cheers
Elmar
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: engine mount torque values |
In the unlikely event the attached
png file doesn't work, here comes
an alternative (low-res pdf).
cheers
Elmar
Message 4
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: MOGAS APPROVAL |
Hi Mark,
It will be fine.
But, to be totally sure, I'd get a couple of cartons of a product called
Tetraboost, which is TEL [no idea how they are allowed to sell it, but it is
for the racing car world!!], and chuck about half a litre in per full tank.
Regards
Richard
Rhodds Farm
Lyonshall
Hereford
HR5 3LW
United Kingdom
Tel: +94 (0) 81 241 5137 (Sri Lanka)
Tel: +44 (0) 1544 340120
Fax: +44 (0) 1544 340129
www.russianaeros.com
I'm currently in Sri Lanka but this Mail is working,and my local phone is
+94 779 132 160.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of aerostar6
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 1:33 PM
Subject: Yak-List: Re: MOGAS APPROVAL
Richard,
Have you any official russian opinion on using the new UL91 unleaded
aviation fuel now becoming available in the UK?
It is basically 100LL with the TEL removed (or rather not added!), with an
octane of 91, which according to my M14P handbook appears to satisfy the
octane requirement. My question is whether the lack of TEL will lead to
detonation problems at high power.
I know that mogas has been widely used outside of the UK. Aside from
ethanol/seal problems, have there been any associated anecdotal detonation
or valve guide wear problems?
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=371694#371694
-----------------------------------------------
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by the Invictawiz MailScanner
and is believed to be clean.
http://www.invictawiz.com
-----------------------------------------------
Message 5
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: engine mount torque values |
Elmar,
Thank you...will over ride the com nazis to let you through the firewall.
Doc
-----Original Message-----
>From: Elmar & Manuela Hegenauer <samira.h@shaw.ca>
>Sent: Apr 24, 2012 3:16 AM
>To: yak-list@matronics.com
>Subject: Yak-List: engine mount torque values
>
>FWIK the engine mounts are not tightened
>by torque but rather by measurement, please
>see attached picture.
>
>BTW Viperdoc, in the past I have sent you
>several times documents regarding some
>of your questions on the list but all my emails
>bounced, guess you have blocked me - tough luck :-)
>
>cheers
>
>Elmar
>
Message 6
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: engine mount torque values |
-----Original Message-----
>From: Elmar & Manuela Hegenauer <samira.h@shaw.ca>
>Sent: Apr 24, 2012 3:41 AM
>To: Yak-List@matronics.com
>Subject: Yak-List: Re: engine mount torque values
>
>In the unlikely event the attached
>png file doesn't work, here comes
>an alternative (low-res pdf).
>
>cheers
>
>Elmar
>
Message 7
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|