Yak-List Digest Archive

Mon 07/14/14


Total Messages Posted: 17



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 08:52 AM - Re: Yak 50 spades (Bitterlich, Mark G CIV NAVAIR, WD)
     2. 09:01 AM - Re: Yak 50 spades (Todd McCutchan)
     3. 10:15 AM - Oil (Ernest Martinez)
     4. 10:32 AM - Re: Oil (Jan Mevis)
     5. 12:39 PM - Re: Oil (DaBear)
     6. 02:21 PM - Re: Oil (Jim)
     7. 03:14 PM - Re: Oil (Ernest Martinez)
     8. 04:09 PM - Housai / Nanchang 285 hp engine, prop, SS exhaust for sale (david stroud)
     9. 04:22 PM - Re: Oil (Jon Blake)
    10. 05:12 PM - Re: Oil (keithmckinley)
    11. 05:15 PM - Re: Re: Oil (Ernest Martinez)
    12. 05:22 PM - Re: Oil (keithmckinley)
    13. 05:28 PM - Re: Re: Oil (Ernest Martinez)
    14. 06:48 PM - Re: Re: Oil (Roger Kemp)
    15. 08:38 PM - Re: Re: Oil (cjpilot710@aol.com)
    16. 11:35 PM - Re: Re: Oil (Jan Mevis)
    17. 11:37 PM - Re: Oil (Walter Lannon)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:52:22 AM PST US
    From: "Bitterlich, Mark G CIV NAVAIR, WD" <mark.bitterlich@navy.mil>
    Subject: Yak 50 spades
    Todd, are you speaking Spades or Shovels? The shovels go on the end of the aileron, and spades of course attach underneath the aileron vis--vis how it works on the Sukhoi's. FYI, no original Russian designed YAK-50 ever had spades attached, as the structure of the aileron was not intended to carry that loading. Shovels on the other hand, were installed by the factory. Since spare ailerons are not all that easy to find these days, I'd advise caution in installing Spades. Mark Bitterlich -----Original Message----- From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Todd McCutchan Sent: Friday, July 11, 2014 1:23 PM Subject: Yak-List: Yak 50 spades I am looking for aileron spades for the Yak 50. Please contact me if you have or know of any for sale. My info is below. Kind regards, Todd McCutchan T-34A & Yak-50 Cell: (260) 402-1740 E-mail: todd@fastaircraft.com www.fastaircraft.com


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:01:10 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Yak 50 spades
    From: Todd McCutchan <todd@fastaircraft.com>
    Sorry. I should have been more accurate. The "load removing aileron" or "shovels" which attach to the end of the aile ron. As you pointed out Mark I am not aware of any traditional "spades" mounting t o the top or bottom of the aileron; only the end of them. Agree with your as sessment. Cheers! Todd McCutchan T-34A & Yak-50 Cell: (260) 402-1740 E-mail: todd@fastaircraft.com www.fastaircraft.com > On Jul 14, 2014, at 8:50 AM, "Bitterlich, Mark G CIV NAVAIR, WD" <mark.bit terlich@navy.mil> wrote: > bitterlich@navy.mil> > > Todd, are you speaking Spades or Shovels? > > The shovels go on the end of the aileron, and spades of course attach unde rneath the aileron vis-=C3--vis how it works on the Sukhoi's. > > FYI, no original Russian designed YAK-50 ever had spades attached, as the s tructure of the aileron was not intended to carry that loading. > > Shovels on the other hand, were installed by the factory. > > Since spare ailerons are not all that easy to find these days, I'd advise c aution in installing Spades. > > Mark Bitterlich > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@ma tronics.com] On Behalf Of Todd McCutchan > Sent: Friday, July 11, 2014 1:23 PM > To: yak-list@matronics.com > Subject: Yak-List: Yak 50 spades > > I am looking for aileron spades for the Yak 50. > > Please contact me if you have or know of any for sale. > > My info is below. > > Kind regards, > Todd McCutchan > T-34A & Yak-50 > Cell: (260) 402-1740 > E-mail: todd@fastaircraft.com > www.fastaircraft.com > > > > > > > > ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= ========================== ========= > > >


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:15:54 AM PST US
    Subject: Oil
    From: Ernest Martinez <erniel29@gmail.com>
    In my previous CJ I used to use the Phillips 25/60 Radial Engine Oil and was happy with it. My new plane has been running AeroShell all of it's US life ( 12+ years) and it's a strong, very dry, motor thats working just fine with excellent oil analysis trends. My first thought was to switch to the Phillips at next oil change, but then my 2nd thought was "if it aint broke don't fix it". I was hoping to get some thoughts on this, since I'm not sure what makes "Radial Engine Oil" any different than flat engine oil. Ernie


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:32:32 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Oil
    From: Jan Mevis <jan.mevis@informavia.be>
    Here in Europe we can't readily find the Phillips 25/60 Radial Engine Oil, but we use Aeroshell W100 also specially made for radials. Total D100 in France, but that's the same. Radial Engine Oil has absolutely no synthetic parts. It is single grade. It is very important NOT to use any semi-synthetic oil on a radial: the pressures caused by the main piston in the crankshaft (the nr 4 in M14P) are so high that they would crack the synthetic oil molecules, making the oil "less lubricating". Only my 2 cents, Jan From: Ernest Martinez <erniel29@gmail.com> Subject: Yak-List: Oil In my previous CJ I used to use the Phillips 25/60 Radial Engine Oil and was happy with it. My new plane has been running AeroShell all of it's US life ( 12+ years) and it's a strong, very dry, motor thats working just fine with excellent oil analysis trends. My first thought was to switch to the Phillips at next oil change, but then my 2nd thought was "if it aint broke don't fix it". I was hoping to get some thoughts on this, since I'm not sure what makes "Radial Engine Oil" any different than flat engine oil. Ernie


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:39:27 PM PST US
    From: "DaBear" <dabear@damned.org>
    Subject: Oil
    Ernie, I=99ve used the 25/60 multi-weight oil for both of my M14=99s and I did switch from the 100W that the previous owner used to the 25w60 for the Housai. That said, I wouldn=99t switch from 100W unless you really had a reason. One thing with the 100w is that since many of the flat engine airplanes use it, it is easier to find while travelling. Good luck with the new CJ Bear From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Ernest Martinez Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 1:15 PM Subject: Yak-List: Oil In my previous CJ I used to use the Phillips 25/60 Radial Engine Oil and was happy with it. My new plane has been running AeroShell all of it's US life ( 12+ years) and it's a strong, very dry, motor thats working just fine with excellent oil analysis trends. My first thought was to switch to the Phillips at next oil change, but then my 2nd thought was "if it aint broke don't fix it". I was hoping to get some thoughts on this, since I'm not sure what makes "Radial Engine Oil" any different than flat engine oil. Ernie


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:21:09 PM PST US
    From: Jim <jim@jimivey.com>
    Subject: Re: Oil
    Ernie, You didn't specify if the Aeroshell your airplane has been using was W100, W120 or a multi-grade . I use Aeroshell W120 and found it best for my high temperature environment. Years ago I got smart and tried multi-weight and even worse added Lenkite. The thing leaked out oil like shit out of a Christmas goose. Went back to Aeroshell W120 and haven't looked back. Even more important would be an engine (unlike yours) that had been run on non-detergent mineral oil. A good way to die would be switching from straight mineral oil to detergent oil (AD). I know somebody that had a total catastrophic failure when he switched to AD oil and the detergent did it's job and loosened up all the "sleeping" gunk and deposits in the engine which plugged the oil system. Over Lake Washington. It is never a good idea to switch horses midstream (say after 100SMOH or so) when it comes to oil. Jim On 7/14/2014 1:37 PM, DaBear wrote: > > Ernie, > > Ive used the 25/60 multi-weight oil for both of my M14s and I did > switch from the 100W that the previous owner used to the 25w60 for the > Housai. That said, I wouldnt switch from 100W unless you really had > a reason. One thing with the 100w is that since many of the flat > engine airplanes use it, it is easier to find while travelling. > > Good luck with the new CJ > > Bear > > *From:*owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] *On Behalf Of *Ernest > Martinez > *Sent:* Monday, July 14, 2014 1:15 PM > *To:* yak-list > *Subject:* Yak-List: Oil > > In my previous CJ I used to use the Phillips 25/60 Radial Engine Oil > and was happy with it. My new plane has been running AeroShell all of > it's US life ( 12+ years) and it's a strong, very dry, motor thats > working just fine with excellent oil analysis trends. > > My first thought was to switch to the Phillips at next oil change, but > then my 2nd thought was "if it aint broke don't fix it". > > I was hoping to get some thoughts on this, since I'm not sure what > makes "Radial Engine Oil" any different than flat engine oil. > > Ernie > > * * > * * > ** > ** > ** > ** > ** > *http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List* > ** > ** > *http://forums.matronics.com* > ** > ** > ** > ** > *http://www.matronics.com/contribution* > ** > * * > * > > > *


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:14:32 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Oil
    From: Ernest Martinez <erniel29@gmail.com>
    I'm currently on Aeroshell W100. But I'm in Florida and wondering if W120 would be better for the hot weather here. But I have to say that this is one of the driest Housai motors I've seen. Ernie On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Jim <jim@jimivey.com> wrote: > Ernie, > > You didn't specify if the Aeroshell your airplane has been using was W100 , > W120 or a multi-grade . I use Aeroshell W120 and found it best for my hi gh > temperature environment. Years ago I got smart and tried multi-weight an d > even worse added Lenkite. The thing leaked out oil like shit out of a > Christmas goose. Went back to Aeroshell W120 and haven't looked back. > > Even more important would be an engine (unlike yours) that had been run o n > non-detergent mineral oil. A good way to die would be switching from > straight mineral oil to detergent oil (AD). I know somebody that had a > total catastrophic failure when he switched to AD oil and the detergent d id > it's job and loosened up all the "sleeping" gunk and deposits in the engi ne > which plugged the oil system. Over Lake Washington. > > It is never a good idea to switch horses midstream (say after 100SMOH or > so) when it comes to oil. > > Jim > > > On 7/14/2014 1:37 PM, DaBear wrote: > > Ernie, > > > I=99ve used the 25/60 multi-weight oil for both of my M14=99s and I did switch > from the 100W that the previous owner used to the 25w60 for the Housai. > That said, I wouldn=99t switch from 100W unless you really had a re ason. One > thing with the 100w is that since many of the flat engine airplanes use i t, > it is easier to find while travelling. > > > Good luck with the new CJ > > > Bear > > > *From:* owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [ > mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com > <owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com>] *On Behalf Of *Ernest Martinez > *Sent:* Monday, July 14, 2014 1:15 PM > *To:* yak-list > *Subject:* Yak-List: Oil > > > In my previous CJ I used to use the Phillips 25/60 Radial Engine Oil and > was happy with it. My new plane has been running AeroShell all of it's US > life ( 12+ years) and it's a strong, very dry, motor thats working just > fine with excellent oil analysis trends. > > > My first thought was to switch to the Phillips at next oil change, but > then my 2nd thought was "if it aint broke don't fix it". > > > I was hoping to get some thoughts on this, since I'm not sure what makes > "Radial Engine Oil" any different than flat engine oil. > > > Ernie > > > *http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List <http://www.matronics.c om/Navigator?Yak-List>* > > *http://forums.matronics.com <http://forums.matronics.com>* > > *http://www.matronics.com/contribution <http://www.matronics.com/cont ribution>* > > > * > =========== nics.com/Navigator?Yak-List> =========== =========== om/contribution> =========== > > * > >


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:09:45 PM PST US
    From: "david stroud" <dwstroud@xplornet.com>
    Subject: Housai / Nanchang 285 hp engine, prop, SS exhaust for sale
    Hope I post this right lads. I have an engine, prop and exhaust for sale. Removed about 4 years ago and replaced with MP14 by Victoria Air Mtce in BC, Canada. No logs....reportedly 350 hrs. Engine complete. in Ottawa, Canada and I could deliver to a reasonable distance for cost or get it to Forward Air in upstate, NY. This engine needs to be sold, my project is abandoned due to health etc. any reasonable offer considered. Thanks... Dave Stroud dwstroud@xplornet.com 613-227-8852


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:22:18 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Oil
    From: Jon Blake <jblake207@comcast.net>
    RG9uJ3QgZml4IGl0IGl0IGFpbid0IGJyb2tlLi4uCgpTZW50IGZyb20gbXkgVmVyaXpvbiBXaXJl bGVzcyA0RyBMVEUgRFJPSUQKCkVybmVzdCBNYXJ0aW5leiA8ZXJuaWVsMjlAZ21haWwuY29tPiB3 cm90ZToKCj5JJ20gY3VycmVudGx5IG9uIEFlcm9zaGVsbCBXMTAwLiBCdXQgSSdtIGluIEZsb3Jp ZGEgYW5kIHdvbmRlcmluZyBpZiBXMTIwIHdvdWxkIGJlIGJldHRlciBmb3IgdGhlIGhvdCB3ZWF0 aGVyIGhlcmUuIEJ1dCBJIGhhdmUgdG8gc2F5IHRoYXQgdGhpcyBpcyBvbmUgb2YgdGhlIGRyaWVz dCBIb3VzYWkgbW90b3JzIEkndmUgc2Vlbi4KPgo+Cj5Fcm5pZQo+Cj4KPgo+T24gTW9uLCBKdWwg MTQsIDIwMTQgYXQgNToyMCBQTSwgSmltIDxqaW1AamltaXZleS5jb20+IHdyb3RlOgo+Cj5Fcm5p ZSwKPgo+WW91IGRpZG4ndCBzcGVjaWZ5IGlmIHRoZSBBZXJvc2hlbGwgeW91ciBhaXJwbGFuZSBo YXMgYmVlbiB1c2luZyB3YXMgVzEwMCwgVzEyMCBvciBhIG11bHRpLWdyYWRlIC7CoCBJIHVzZSBB ZXJvc2hlbGwgVzEyMCBhbmQgZm91bmQgaXQgYmVzdCBmb3IgbXkgaGlnaCB0ZW1wZXJhdHVyZSBl bnZpcm9ubWVudC7CoCBZZWFycyBhZ28gSSBnb3Qgc21hcnQgYW5kIHRyaWVkIG11bHRpLXdlaWdo dCBhbmQgZXZlbiB3b3JzZSBhZGRlZCBMZW5raXRlLsKgIFRoZSB0aGluZyBsZWFrZWQgb3V0IG9p bCBsaWtlIHNoaXQgb3V0IG9mIGEgQ2hyaXN0bWFzIGdvb3NlLsKgIFdlbnQgYmFjayB0byBBZXJv c2hlbGwgVzEyMCBhbmQgaGF2ZW4ndCBsb29rZWQgYmFjay4KPgo+RXZlbiBtb3JlIGltcG9ydGFu dCB3b3VsZCBiZSBhbiBlbmdpbmUgKHVubGlrZSB5b3VycykgdGhhdCBoYWQgYmVlbiBydW4gb24g bm9uLWRldGVyZ2VudCBtaW5lcmFsIG9pbC7CoCBBIGdvb2Qgd2F5IHRvIGRpZSB3b3VsZCBiZSBz d2l0Y2hpbmcgZnJvbSBzdHJhaWdodCBtaW5lcmFsIG9pbCB0byBkZXRlcmdlbnQgb2lsIChBRCku wqAgSSBrbm93IHNvbWVib2R5IHRoYXQgaGFkIGEgdG90YWwgY2F0YXN0cm9waGljIGZhaWx1cmUg d2hlbiBoZSBzd2l0Y2hlZCB0byBBRCBvaWwgYW5kIHRoZSBkZXRlcmdlbnQgZGlkIGl0J3Mgam9i IGFuZCBsb29zZW5lZCB1cCBhbGwgdGhlICJzbGVlcGluZyIgZ3VuayBhbmQgZGVwb3NpdHMgaW4g dGhlIGVuZ2luZSB3aGljaCBwbHVnZ2VkIHRoZSBvaWwgc3lzdGVtLsKgIE92ZXIgTGFrZSBXYXNo aW5ndG9uLgo+Cj5JdCBpcyBuZXZlciBhIGdvb2QgaWRlYSB0byBzd2l0Y2ggaG9yc2VzIG1pZHN0 cmVhbSAoc2F5IGFmdGVyIDEwMFNNT0ggb3Igc28pIHdoZW4gaXQgY29tZXMgdG8gb2lsLgo+Cj5K aW0KPgo+Cj4KPk9uIDcvMTQvMjAxNCAxOjM3IFBNLCBEYUJlYXIgd3JvdGU6Cj4KPkVybmllLAo+ Cj7CoAo+Cj5J4oCZdmUgdXNlZCB0aGUgMjUvNjAgbXVsdGktd2VpZ2h0IG9pbCBmb3IgYm90aCBv ZiBteSBNMTTigJlzIGFuZCBJIGRpZCBzd2l0Y2ggZnJvbSB0aGUgMTAwVyB0aGF0IHRoZSBwcmV2 aW91cyBvd25lciB1c2VkIHRvIHRoZSAyNXc2MCBmb3IgdGhlIEhvdXNhaS7CoCBUaGF0IHNhaWQs IEkgd291bGRu4oCZdCBzd2l0Y2ggZnJvbSAxMDBXIHVubGVzcyB5b3UgcmVhbGx5IGhhZCBhIHJl YXNvbi7CoCBPbmUgdGhpbmcgd2l0aCB0aGUgMTAwdyBpcyB0aGF0IHNpbmNlIG1hbnkgb2YgdGhl IGZsYXQgZW5naW5lIGFpcnBsYW5lcyB1c2UgaXQsIGl0IGlzIGVhc2llciB0byBmaW5kIHdoaWxl IHRyYXZlbGxpbmcuCj4KPsKgCj4KPkdvb2QgbHVjayB3aXRoIHRoZSBuZXcgQ0oKPgo+wqAKPgo+ QmVhcgo+Cj7CoAo+Cj5Gcm9tOiBvd25lci15YWstbGlzdC1zZXJ2ZXJAbWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbSBb bWFpbHRvOm93bmVyLXlhay1saXN0LXNlcnZlckBtYXRyb25pY3MuY29tXSBPbiBCZWhhbGYgT2Yg RXJuZXN0IE1hcnRpbmV6Cj5TZW50OiBNb25kYXksIEp1bHkgMTQsIDIwMTQgMToxNSBQTQo+VG86 IHlhay1saXN0Cj5TdWJqZWN0OiBZYWstTGlzdDogT2lsCj4KPsKgCj4KPkluIG15IHByZXZpb3Vz IENKIEkgdXNlZCB0byB1c2UgdGhlIFBoaWxsaXBzIDI1LzYwIFJhZGlhbCBFbmdpbmUgT2lsIGFu ZCB3YXMgaGFwcHkgd2l0aCBpdC4gTXkgbmV3IHBsYW5lIGhhcyBiZWVuIHJ1bm5pbmcgQWVyb1No ZWxsIGFsbCBvZiBpdCdzIFVTIGxpZmUgKCAxMisgeWVhcnMpIGFuZCBpdCdzIGEgc3Ryb25nLCB2 ZXJ5IGRyeSwgbW90b3IgdGhhdHMgd29ya2luZyBqdXN0IGZpbmUgd2l0aCBleGNlbGxlbnQgb2ls IGFuYWx5c2lzIHRyZW5kcy7CoAo+Cj7CoAo+Cj5NeSBmaXJzdCB0aG91Z2h0IHdhcyB0byBzd2l0 Y2ggdG8gdGhlIFBoaWxsaXBzIGF0IG5leHQgb2lsIGNoYW5nZSwgYnV0IHRoZW4gbXkgMm5kIHRo b3VnaHQgd2FzICJpZiBpdCBhaW50IGJyb2tlIGRvbid0IGZpeCBpdCIuCj4KPsKgCj4KPkkgd2Fz IGhvcGluZyB0byBnZXQgc29tZSB0aG91Z2h0cyBvbiB0aGlzLCBzaW5jZSBJJ20gbm90IHN1cmUg d2hhdCBtYWtlcyAiUmFkaWFsIEVuZ2luZSBPaWwiIGFueSBkaWZmZXJlbnQgdGhhbiBmbGF0IGVu Z2luZSBvaWwuCj4KPsKgCj4KPkVybmllCj4KPsKgIMKgIGh0dHA6Ly93d3cubWF0cm9uaWNzLmNv bS9OYXZpZ2F0b3I/WWFrLUxpc3QgaHR0cDovL2ZvcnVtcy5tYXRyb25pY3MuY29tIGh0dHA6Ly93 d3cubWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbS9jb250cmlidXRpb24gwqAgCj4KPgo+ZXQ9Il9ibGFuayI+aHR0cDov L3d3dy5tYXRyb25pY3MuY29tL05hdmlnYXRvcj9ZYWstTGlzdCB0cDovL2ZvcnVtcy5tYXRyb25p Y3MuY29tIF9ibGFuayI+aHR0cDovL3d3dy5tYXRyb25pY3MuY29tL2NvbnRyaWJ1dGlvbiAKPgo+ Cj5fLT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PSBfLT0gLSBUaGUgWWFrLUxpc3QgRW1haWwgRm9ydW0gLSBfLT0gVXNlIHRoZSBNYXRy b25pY3MgTGlzdCBGZWF0dXJlcyBOYXZpZ2F0b3IgdG8gYnJvd3NlIF8tPSB0aGUgbWFueSBMaXN0 IHV0aWxpdGllcyBzdWNoIGFzIExpc3QgVW4vU3Vic2NyaXB0aW9uLCBfLT0gQXJjaGl2ZSBTZWFy Y2ggJiBEb3dubG9hZCwgNy1EYXkgQnJvd3NlLCBDaGF0LCBGQVEsIF8tPSBQaG90b3NoYXJlLCBh bmQgbXVjaCBtdWNoIG1vcmU6IF8tPSBfLT0gLS0+IGh0dHA6Ly93d3cubWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbS9O YXZpZ2F0b3I/WWFrLUxpc3QgXy09IF8tPT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09IF8tPSAtIE1BVFJPTklDUyBXRUIgRk9SVU1TIC0g Xy09IFNhbWUgZ3JlYXQgY29udGVudCBhbHNvIGF2YWlsYWJsZSB2aWEgdGhlIFdlYiBGb3J1bXMh IF8tPSBfLT0gLS0+IGh0dHA6Ly9mb3J1bXMubWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbSBfLT0gXy09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT0gXy09IC0g TGlzdCBDb250cmlidXRpb24gV2ViIFNpdGUgLSBfLT0gVGhhbmsgeW91IGZvciB5b3VyIGdlbmVy b3VzIHN1cHBvcnQhIF8tPSAtTWF0dCBEcmFsbGUsIExpc3QgQWRtaW4uIF8tPSAtLT4gaHR0cDov L3d3dy5tYXRyb25pY3MuY29tL2NvbnRyaWJ1dGlvbiBfLT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PSA


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:12:30 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Oil
    From: "keithmckinley" <cetopfed@gmail.com>
    I'd like to know what the "driest housai I've ever seen" has to do with oil type. yawn.... -------- Keith McKinley 700HS X26 Sebastian, FL Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=426678#426678


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:15:27 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Oil
    From: Ernest Martinez <erniel29@gmail.com>
    Which part don't you understand? On Monday, July 14, 2014, keithmckinley <cetopfed@gmail.com> wrote: > <javascript:;>> > > I'd like to know what the "driest housai I've ever seen" has to do with > oil type. yawn.... > > -------- > Keith McKinley > 700HS > X26 Sebastian, FL > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=426678#426678 > >


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:22:21 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Oil
    From: "keithmckinley" <cetopfed@gmail.com>
    see the don't fix it if ain't broke post or maybe search past posts. Lots of info out there. lighten up. -------- Keith McKinley 700HS X26 Sebastian, FL Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=426680#426680


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:28:29 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Oil
    From: Ernest Martinez <erniel29@gmail.com>
    Thanks for your valuable post. Sorry to bore you. Ernie On Monday, July 14, 2014, keithmckinley <cetopfed@gmail.com> wrote: > <javascript:;>> > > see the don't fix it if ain't broke post or maybe search past posts. Lots > of info out there. lighten up. > > -------- > Keith McKinley > 700HS > X26 Sebastian, FL > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=426680#426680 > >


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:48:41 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Oil
    From: Roger Kemp <f16viperdoc@me.com>
    Ditto. VD Sent from my iPad > On Jul 14, 2014, at 7:11 PM, keithmckinley <cetopfed@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I'd like to know what the "driest housai I've ever seen" has to do with oil type. yawn.... > > -------- > Keith McKinley > 700HS > X26 Sebastian, FL > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=426678#426678 > > > > > > > > > >


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:38:56 PM PST US
    From: cjpilot710@aol.com
    Subject: Re: Oil
    Guys, I've been flying airplanes for over 50 years, and the only shit I really know for certain about is that IF you keep your engine on mineral oil, NEVER mix in a detergent oil. It use to be that mineral oil was used to break-in an engine after overhaul, than you either continued to use mineral oil or you switch to a detergent oil. Times change and you very seldom find mineral oil in stock at FBOs anymore. If you happened to run into a place that didn't have detergent oil - you could add mineral oil to get to you next stop. NOT SO if you used just mineral oil. I've always used a straight grade detergent oil in my M14p (SAE100 winter 120 summer). You can mix the two grades in a pinch. My experience with multi grade oils (beside being expensive) was always the engine suddenly seem to be leaking oil all over the place. I DO NOT KNOW WHY, but except with normal leaks one always finds on radials (mostly push rod tubes and rocker covers) my engine stayed pretty clean most of the time. But one oil change I went to multi grade, and I had oil every where in an engine that was dry before. When it comes to which oil is better, I'm no expert but what will extend the life of an engine are four things. A good pre-oiler. A good oil filter (20 micros or less). Regular oil changes. And keep 'back loading" to a minimum and reduced max power operation. ( I guess that's 5) The engines on the B-17 and B-24 I get to fly are more sensitive to handling than they are to oil (however the foundation does use multi grade) and because the engines USE oil precociously ( 1 gal/hr ) we don't do oil changes. (besides have you ever tried to dispose of 30 gals at one time?) But we regularly get 1,500 hours on them between overhauls. I believe its mostly because we use pre-oilers religiously and have really fine oil filters. Plus how we operate the engines has a significant effect. I am sure one could make an argument on the advantages/disadvantages of one oil over the other. I personally prefer a straight grade. Jim "Pappy" Goolsby In a message dated 7/14/2014 9:48:56 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, f16viperdoc@me.com writes: --> Yak-List message posted by: Roger Kemp <f16viperdoc@me.com> Ditto. VD Sent from my iPad > On Jul 14, 2014, at 7:11 PM, keithmckinley <cetopfed@gmail.com> wrote: > > --> Yak-List message posted by: "keithmckinley" <cetopfed@gmail.com> > > I'd like to know what the "driest housai I've ever seen" has to do with oil type. yawn.... > > -------- > Keith McKinley > 700HS > X26 Sebastian, FL > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=426678#426678 > > > > > > > > > >


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:35:25 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Oil
    From: Jan Mevis <jan.mevis@informavia.be>
    Actually, the term detergent oil is an obsolete term, ashless dispersant is more accurate. Detergent oils were traditionally the heavy truck engine oils containing ashless dispersants AND ash containing detergents. Because of the negative effect on aircraft engine performance, ash-containing oils must not be used on aircraft piston engines. The reverse is also true: never use an aircraft piston engine oil in a modern car or heavy duty truck because of the hughe differences in metallurgy, operating conditions and fuel specifications. The straight mineral oil Aeroshell 100 is absolutely "pure": no additives, straight mineral oil. The Aeroshell W100 has a non ash forming, polymeric additive. This polymeric additive is to compensate the (early) demand for additives on mineral oil for the high performance aircraft piston engines. The ancient additives were based on metallic salts of barium (I think). And thus caused ash deposits in the combustion chambers. But they were needed for additional thermal stability. A multigrade oil like the Aeroshell W 15W-50 (lycoming etc) is about 50/50 straight mineral oil and synthetic hydrocarbons plus ashless dispersant additives. They must not be used on radials because the synthetic hydrocarbons can't stand the high pressures in the cranckshaft of a radial. I personally use Aeroshell W 100 PLUS, that is Aeroshell W100 plus the Lycoming LW 16702 anti-wear additive. This helps when you don't run the engine very often. Jan Yak 50 with M14R engine From: <cjpilot710@aol.com> Subject: Re: Yak-List: Re: Oil Guys, I've been flying airplanes for over 50 years, and the only shit I really know for certain about is that IF you keep your engine on mineral oil, NEVER mix in a detergent oil. It use to be that mineral oil was used to break-in an engine after overhaul, than you either continued to use mineral oil or you switch to a detergent oil. Times change and you very seldom find mineral oil in stock at FBOs anymore. If you happened to run into a place that didn't have detergent oil - you could add mineral oil to get to you next stop. NOT SO if you used just mineral oil. I've always used a straight grade detergent oil in my M14p (SAE100 winter 120 summer). You can mix the two grades in a pinch. My experience with multi grade oils (beside being expensive) was always the engine suddenly seem to be leaking oil all over the place. I DO NOT KNOW WHY, but except with normal leaks one always finds on radials (mostly push rod tubes and rocker covers) my engine stayed pretty clean most of the time. But one oil change I went to multi grade, and I had oil every where in an engine that was dry before. When it comes to which oil is better, I'm no expert but what will extend the life of an engine are four things. A good pre-oiler. A good oil filter (20 micros or less). Regular oil changes. And keep 'back loading" to a minimum and reduced max power operation. ( I guess that's 5) The engines on the B-17 and B-24 I get to fly are more sensitive to handling than they are to oil (however the foundation does use multi grade) and because the engines USE oil precociously ( 1 gal/hr ) we don't do oil changes. (besides have you ever tried to dispose of 30 gals at one time?) But we regularly get 1,500 hours on them between overhauls. I believe its mostly because we use pre-oilers religiously and have really fine oil filters. Plus how we operate the engines has a significant effect. I am sure one could make an argument on the advantages/disadvantages of one oil over the other. I personally prefer a straight grade. Jim "Pappy" Goolsby In a message dated 7/14/2014 9:48:56 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, f16viperdoc@me.com writes: > --> Yak-List message posted by: Roger Kemp <f16viperdoc@me.com> > > Ditto. > VD > > Sent from my iPad > >> > On Jul 14, 2014, at 7:11 PM, keithmckinley <cetopfed@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > --> Yak-List message posted by: "keithmckinley" <cetopfed@gmail.com> >> > >> > I'd like to know what the "driest housai I've ever seen" has to do with >> oil type. yawn.... >> > >> > -------- >> > Keith McKinley >> > 700HS >> > X26 Sebastian, FL >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Read this topic online here: >> > >> > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=426678#426678 >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > ies ay - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS - List >> Contribution Web Site p; > > >


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:37:26 PM PST US
    From: "Walter Lannon" <wlannon@shaw.ca>
    Subject: Re: Oil
    Hi Ernie; I would recommend that you stay with the Aeroshell W oils. Your location does not experience severe temperature changes so W100 winter and W120 summer should be just fine. With just one exception all of the approved aviation (piston) engine oils are mineral oils. This includes the Phillips X/C 20W50 and 25W60. As far as I know, the only difference (if you can refer to it as such) between radial and opposed engine oils is the recommended viscosity. There is no such thing as an aviation detergent oil (though I believe there was, briefly, some 60 + years ago). There are three basic varieties of aviation mineral oils. 1. No additives (straight) e.g: 100 SUS or 50 SAE. 2. An ashless dispersant additive (AD oils) e.g: W100/ W50. ( the W is used by Aeroshell & Phillips other companies may have different designators) 3. Multi-Grade AD oils with a viscosity modifier added e.g: Phillips X/C 25W60, Aeroshell 15W50. Both use SAE viscosity numbers (60 SAE = 120 SUS). The exception referred to above is the Aeroshell multi-grade. It is a 50% synthetic. It appears to be a very good oil for relatively modern opposed engines but I would not use it in any radial. Apparently it has been improved over the years but:- I used it in an E225 Continental years ago and found (compared to the previous W100) the oil pressure dropped, oil temp. increased and, over time, it seeped right through the crankcase! About the same time a friend put it in his Harvard (R1340) and shortly after parked it for about 3 months. When he returned there was no oil left. Personally I have been using 25W60 for some time in CJ=99s and Harvard=99s primarily due to the seasonal temperature change ( =9310C to 40C). Walt From: Ernest Martinez Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 3:13 PM Subject: Re: Yak-List: Oil I'm currently on Aeroshell W100. But I'm in Florida and wondering if W120 would be better for the hot weather here. But I have to say that this is one of the driest Housai motors I've seen. Ernie On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Jim <jim@jimivey.com> wrote: Ernie, You didn't specify if the Aeroshell your airplane has been using was W100, W120 or a multi-grade . I use Aeroshell W120 and found it best for my high temperature environment. Years ago I got smart and tried multi-weight and even worse added Lenkite. The thing leaked out oil like shit out of a Christmas goose. Went back to Aeroshell W120 and haven't looked back. Even more important would be an engine (unlike yours) that had been run on non-detergent mineral oil. A good way to die would be switching from straight mineral oil to detergent oil (AD). I know somebody that had a total catastrophic failure when he switched to AD oil and the detergent did it's job and loosened up all the "sleeping" gunk and deposits in the engine which plugged the oil system. Over Lake Washington. It is never a good idea to switch horses midstream (say after 100SMOH or so) when it comes to oil. Jim On 7/14/2014 1:37 PM, DaBear wrote: Ernie, I=99ve used the 25/60 multi-weight oil for both of my M14=99s and I did switch from the 100W that the previous owner used to the 25w60 for the Housai. That said, I wouldn=99t switch from 100W unless you really had a reason. One thing with the 100w is that since many of the flat engine airplanes use it, it is easier to find while travelling. Good luck with the new CJ Bear From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Ernest Martinez Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 1:15 PM To: yak-list Subject: Yak-List: Oil In my previous CJ I used to use the Phillips 25/60 Radial Engine Oil and was happy with it. My new plane has been running AeroShell all of it's US life ( 12+ years) and it's a strong, very dry, motor thats working just fine with excellent oil analysis trends. My first thought was to switch to the Phillips at next oil change, but then my 2nd thought was "if it aint broke don't fix it". I was hoping to get some thoughts on this, since I'm not sure what makes "Radial Engine Oil" any different than flat engine oil. Ernie http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-Listhttp://forums.matronics.comhtt p://www.matronics.com/contribution et="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List tp://forums.matronics.com _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   yak-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Yak-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/yak-list
  • Browse Yak-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/yak-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --