Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 01:09 AM - Re: Questions for the Yak 55 operators. (Richard Goode)
2. 06:26 AM - Serial #/Build Date (727gs)
3. 08:22 AM - Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Questions for the Yak 55 operators. (Bitterlich, Mark G CIV NAVAIR, WD)
4. 09:30 AM - Re: Serial #/Build Date (Walter Lannon)
5. 09:59 AM - Re: Serial #/Build Date (William Halverson)
6. 10:12 AM - Re: Serial #/Build Date (Justin Drafts)
7. 11:27 AM - Re: Serial #/Build Date (cjpilot710@aol.com)
8. 11:47 AM - Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Questions for the Yak 55 operators. (cjpilot710@aol.com)
9. 12:20 PM - Re: Serial #/Build Date (cjpilot710@aol.com)
10. 12:50 PM - Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Questions for the Yak 55 operators. (Bitterlich, Mark G CIV NAVAIR, WD)
11. 01:26 PM - (Robert Schwartz)
12. 01:52 PM - Re: (Terry Calloway)
13. 03:03 PM - Re: (Ernest Martinez)
14. 03:55 PM - Re: (Terry Calloway)
15. 06:46 PM - Re: (Ernest Martinez)
16. 07:54 PM - Re: (Dr. Herbert Coussons)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Questions for the Yak 55 operators. |
Again, to make sure I understand: the engine itself has done 1906 hours from
new - have you done any work on it in that time?
Richard Goode Aerobatics
Rhodds Farm
Lyonshall
Hereford
HR5 3LW
Tel: +44 (0) 1544 340120
Fax: +44 (0) 1544 340129
www.russianaeros.com
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of cjpilot710@aol.com
Sent: 19 May 2016 23:03
Subject: Re: Yak-List: Questions for the Yak 55 operators.
Boy did I exaggerated that! (It seem the thing has been on there forever).
Anyway, I installed the M-14p engine our my CJ-6 in 12/97 new from AeroStar.
In 1/2006 at 1,150 hours engine time, I changed to the B&C I-40 alternator
and LSIA. So now at 1,906 hours on the engine the alternator actually has
756 hours on it. I did have to change the (Teflon?) drive gear due to
material failure (B&C gave me new one with changed material because of the
failures) but other than that I've no absolutely no problems with my B&C.
AAMOF, I still have the old generator sitting on a shelf if anybody wants
it. Only changed it to save weight.
PS (As with old pilots, we tend to exaggerated lovers and landings) :-\
Jim "Pappy" Goolsby
In a message dated 5/19/2016 8:35:59 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
<mailto:richard.goode@russianaeros.com> richard.goode@russianaeros.com
writes:
For my interest, is that 1800 hours on the same engine?
Richard Goode Aerobatics
Rhodds Farm
Lyonshall
Hereford
HR5 3LW
Tel: +44 (0) 1544 340120
Fax: +44 (0) 1544 340129
<http://www.russianaeros.com> www.russianaeros.com
From: <mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com>
owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [
<mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com>
mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of
<mailto:cjpilot710@aol.com> cjpilot710@aol.com
Sent: 19 May 2016 12:57
Subject: Re: Yak-List: Questions for the Yak 55 operators.
I've had one on my M14p for over 1,800 hours with NO problems.
Jim "Pappy" Goolsby
In a message dated 5/18/2016 12:53:35 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
<mailto:jbsoar@gmail.com> jbsoar@gmail.com writes:
Who is operating a B&C SD10 alternator? How well does it work?
Also, does anyone have any weight and balance information regarding the
installation of a Scott 3200 tailwheel?
Thank you!
John B
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by <http://www.mailscanner.info/> MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by <http://www.mailscanner.info/> MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Serial #/Build Date |
I remember seeing a CJ serial # graph somewhere that showed a manufacture date
but I don't remember where it was.
My airplane: 4032009
Can someone point me in the right direction?
Thanks in advance.
--------
Steve near Chicago
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=456388#456388
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Questions for the Yak 55 operators. |
Pappy,
If I may bother you ..... you said you had the SD10, which I believe should have
been the SK10. But that small issue aside (it really doesn't matter), the
important thing is that you say here that you are running the LS1A voltage regulator.
That regulator will not work on a SD, or SK10. The LS1A is for the
SK-35 or SK-45 alternator, and also other models but in any case they are all
true alternators with a FIELD winding. The small 10 amp model does not have a
field winding to regulate it. Those others are also the ones that got the new
drive gear that you mentioned.
So since your airplane is the one that has all the hours, I would be curious to
know exactly what is on there. If you have the LS1A, you do not have the 10
amp version from B&C. So?
I cannot find an I-40 model. It may have been discontinued?
Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of cjpilot710@aol.com
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 6:03 PM
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Yak-List: Questions for the Yak 55 operators.
Boy did I exaggerated that! (It seem the thing has been on there forever). Anyway,
I installed the M-14p engine our my CJ-6 in 12/97 new from AeroStar. In
1/2006 at 1,150 hours engine time, I changed to the B&C I-40 alternator and
LSIA. So now at 1,906 hours on the engine the alternator actually has 756 hours
on it. I did have to change the (Teflon?) drive gear due to material failure
(B&C gave me new one with changed material because of the failures) but other
than that I've no absolutely no problems with my B&C. AAMOF, I still have
the old generator sitting on a shelf if anybody wants it. Only changed it to
save weight.
PS (As with old pilots, we tend to exaggerated lovers and landings) :-\
Jim "Pappy" Goolsby
In a message dated 5/19/2016 8:35:59 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, richard.goode@russianaeros.com
writes:
For my interest, is that 1800 hours on the same engine?
Richard Goode Aerobatics
Rhodds Farm
Lyonshall
Hereford
HR5 3LW
Tel: +44 (0) 1544 340120
Fax: +44 (0) 1544 340129
www.russianaeros.com
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of cjpilot710@aol.com
Sent: 19 May 2016 12:57
To: yak-list@matronics.com
Subject: Re: Yak-List: Questions for the Yak 55 operators.
I've had one on my M14p for over 1,800 hours with NO problems.
Jim "Pappy" Goolsby
In a message dated 5/18/2016 12:53:35 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, jbsoar@gmail.com <mailto:jbsoar@gmail.com> writes:
Who is operating a B&C SD10 alternator? How well does it work?
Also, does anyone have any weight and balance information regarding the installation
of a Scott 3200 tailwheel?
Thank you!
John B
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is
believed to be clean.
Message 4
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Serial #/Build Date |
Hi Steve;
Your CJ is # 09 of Batch # 40 from Factory # 320.
There should be a small alum. plate riveted on the forward side of the
firewall on the RH side. It should also show the date of manufacture.
Each major airframe component also has the ID plate.
Walt
-----Original Message-----
From: 727gs
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 6:24 AM
Subject: Yak-List: Serial #/Build Date
I remember seeing a CJ serial # graph somewhere that showed a manufacture
date but I don't remember where it was.
My airplane: 4032009
Can someone point me in the right direction?
Thanks in advance.
--------
Steve near Chicago
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=456388#456388
Message 5
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Serial #/Build Date |
Proof that there is almost no question this group can't answer!
-----Original Message-----
From: Walter Lannon [mailto:wlannon@shaw.ca]
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 12:28 PM
Subject: Re: Yak-List: Serial #/Build Date
of Batch # 40 from Factory # 320.There should be a small alum. plate rive
ted on the forward side of the firewall on the RH side. It should also sh
ow the date of manufacture. Each major airframe component also has the ID
plate.Walt
-----Original Message----- From: 727gsSent: Friday, May 20, 2016 6:24 AM
ist message posted by: "727gs" <727gs@att.net>I remember seeing a CJ seri
al # graph somewhere that showed a manufacture date but I don't remember
where it was.My airplane: 4032009Can someone point me in the right direct
ion?Thanks in advance.--------Steve near ChicagoRead this topic online he
====================
Message 6
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Serial #/Build Date |
I seem to recall that in C Payne's "CJ6 Buyer's Guide", there was a chart
that provided serial #, mfg, reference info... ?
Justin
N280NC
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 8:58 AM, William Halverson <william@netpros.net>
wrote:
> Proof that there is almost no question this group can't answer!
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* Walter Lannon [mailto:wlannon@shaw.ca]
> *Sent:* Friday, May 20, 2016 12:28 PM
> *To:* yak-list@matronics.com
> *Subject:* Re: Yak-List: Serial #/Build Date
>
> of Batch # 40 from Factory # 320. There should be a small alum. plate
> riveted on the forward side of the firewall on the RH side. It should also
> show the date of manufacture. Each major airframe component also has the ID
> plate. Walt
>
>
> -----Original Message----- From: 727gs Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 6:24 AM
> To: yak-list@matronics.com Subject: Yak-List: Serial #/Build Date -->
> CJ serial # graph somewhere that showed a manufacture date but I don't
> remember where it was. My airplane: 4032009 Can someone point me in the
> right direction? Thanks in advance. -------- Steve near Chicago Read this
> topic online here:
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=456388#456388
>
>
Message 7
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Serial #/Build Date |
See the Red Alert - Spring issue 2007 page 5 & 6.
Jim "Pappy" Goolsby
In a message dated 5/20/2016 1:13:33 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
draftsjust417@gmail.com writes:
I seem to recall that in C Payne's "CJ6 Buyer's Guide", there was a chart
that provided serial #, mfg, reference info... ?
Justin
N280NC
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 8:58 AM, William Halverson <_william@netpros.net_
(mailto:william@netpros.net) > wrote:
Proof that there is almost no question this group can't answer!
-----Original Message-----
From: Walter Lannon [mailto:_wlannon@shaw.ca_ (mailto:wlannon@shaw.ca) ]
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 12:28 PM
Subject: Re: Yak-List: Serial #/Build Date
of Batch # 40 from Factory # 320. There should be a small alum. plate
riveted on the forward side of the firewall on the RH side. It should also show
the date of manufacture. Each major airframe component also has the ID
plate. Walt
-----Original Message----- From: 727gs Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 6:24 AM
<_727gs@att.net_ (mailto:727gs@att.net) > I remember seeing a CJ serial # graph
somewhere that showed a manufacture date but I don't remember where it was. My
airplane: 4032009 Can someone point me in the right direction? Thanks in
advance. -------- Steve near Chicago Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=456388#456388
Message 8
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Questions for the Yak 55 operators. |
Mark, and all,
This is what I get for making flippant remarks. Quite frankly it
=99s
embarrassing as hell. First of all in indorsing the B&C alternators - ge
nerally
- I inadvertently left the impression that I had a SD10 (from John B's
question) on my CJ's M-14. Then checking my log book to get the correct
time
in service, (again way over stated in my endorsement) I wrote what was
written (by me BTW) in the log book - a "I-40 alternator". . That turns
out to
be wrong too.
Now with Mark=99s post, I thought I better get my act together and
the
facts. I went out and looked at the damn data plate on the alternator.
You
guessed it - it says "SK-35". Hence why I have the LS1A too. Please don
't
ask me how I got "I-40" (I have no F%$#^'n idea and its been 10 years).
What
I can attest to, is that this alternator - a B&C SK-35 - with the
exception of the coupler - has given me perfect service for 756 hours.
Now for Richard=99s question on the total time of my M-14. I purch
ased my
engine from AeroStar in 96. I was told it was one of the last 3 of the
last
production run. Sam Sax=99s engine is one number different than mi
ne as we
purchased them together.
In July 2000, at the 438 hour mark, I got a chip light. TMALSS we found
#3 piston had a scraper ring in the oil land. That brought into question
were the other pistons wrong also. In removing the rest of the cylinders
we
found them all OK. So I scuffed the barrels, put in all rings and of
course replaced #3 piston. In essence, a =9Ctop overhaul=9D.
At 1,532 hours I replaced #9 piston=99s rings.
At 1,582 hours I did another top over, where I sent the cylinders out
Barrett, who had to replace 3 of them for being out of tolerance.
At 1,805 the oil tank shutoff valve stuck closed (after some 1,000+ hours
)
and because of a distraction, I didn't notice it until starting my run-up
.
The give away was the prop would not cycle. So with some 223 hours on
that top overhaul, I had trashed the engine. I took the engine out to
Barrett where he did a complete zero time overhaul. Several cylinders wer
e
replaced due to damage. Main bearings were changed due to wear. In the
overhaul he installed total seal piston rings and high compression piston
s, which
tested out at 388 hp. There is now 1,975 hours on the engine since new or
170 hours since the overhaul and is running fine.
The biggest and frustrating problem with this engine has been the ignitio
n
system and once a Georgia kid on a crop dusting strip, point that the
harness was shorting out and I order Savorees auto harness, I=99ve
had minimal
problems since. But than again I'm playing with an experimental electron
ic
ignition system right now.
I hope answered those questions and sorry about my rather exaggerated
remarks.
Jim "Pappy" Goolsby
In a message dated 5/20/2016 11:25:03 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
mark.bitterlich@navy.mil writes:
<mark.bitterlich@navy.mil>
Pappy,
If I may bother you ..... you said you had the SD10, which I believe
should have been the SK10. But that small issue aside (it really doesn't
matter), the important thing is that you say here that you are running th
e LS1A
voltage regulator. That regulator will not work on a SD, or SK10. The
LS1A is for the SK-35 or SK-45 alternator, and also other models but in
any
case they are all true alternators with a FIELD winding. The small 10 am
p
model does not have a field winding to regulate it. Those others are als
o
the ones that got the new drive gear that you mentioned.
So since your airplane is the one that has all the hours, I would be
curious to know exactly what is on there. If you have the LS1A, you do
not have
the 10 amp version from B&C. So?
I cannot find an I-40 model. It may have been discontinued?
Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of cjpilot710@aol.
com
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 6:03 PM
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Yak-List: Questions for the Yak 55 operator
s.
Boy did I exaggerated that! (It seem the thing has been on there
forever). Anyway, I installed the M-14p engine our my CJ-6 in 12/97 new
from
AeroStar. In 1/2006 at 1,150 hours engine time, I changed to the B&C I-4
0
alternator and LSIA. So now at 1,906 hours on the engine the alternator
actually has 756 hours on it. I did have to change the (Teflon?) drive
gear due
to material failure (B&C gave me new one with changed material because of
the failures) but other than that I've no absolutely no problems with my
B&C. AAMOF, I still have the old generator sitting on a shelf if anybody
wants it. Only changed it to save weight.
PS (As with old pilots, we tend to exaggerated lovers and landings) :-\
Jim "Pappy" Goolsby
In a message dated 5/19/2016 8:35:59 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
richard.goode@russianaeros.com writes:
For my interest, is that 1800 hours on the same engine?
Richard Goode Aerobatics
Rhodds Farm
Lyonshall
Hereford
HR5 3LW
Tel: +44 (0) 1544 340120
Fax: +44 (0) 1544 340129
www.russianaeros.com
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of cjpilot710@aol.
com
Sent: 19 May 2016 12:57
Subject: Re: Yak-List: Questions for the Yak 55 operators.
I've had one on my M14p for over 1,800 hours with NO problems.
Jim "Pappy" Goolsby
In a message dated 5/18/2016 12:53:35 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
jbsoar@gmail.com <mailto:jbsoar@gmail.com> writes:
Who is operating a B&C SD10 alternator? How well does it work?
Also, does anyone have any weight and balance information regarding the
installation of a Scott 3200 tailwheel?
Thank you!
John B
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is
believed to be clean.
========================
===========
========================
===========
========================
===========
========================
===========
========================
===========
Message 9
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Serial #/Build Date |
Batch 40 was 24 aircraft built between June 1984 and March 1985 at the
Nanchang factory. Airplanes #23 & #24 went to Bangladesh, the remainder to
the PLAF.
Jim "Pappy" Goolsby
In a message dated 5/20/2016 2:25:26 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
cjpilot710@aol.com writes:
See the Red Alert - Spring issue 2007 page 5 & 6.
Jim "Pappy" Goolsby
In a message dated 5/20/2016 1:13:33 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
draftsjust417@gmail.com writes:
I seem to recall that in C Payne's "CJ6 Buyer's Guide", there was a chart
that provided serial #, mfg, reference info... ?
Justin
N280NC
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 8:58 AM, William Halverson <_william@netpros.net_
(mailto:william@netpros.net) > wrote:
Proof that there is almost no question this group can't answer!
-----Original Message-----
From: Walter Lannon [mailto:_wlannon@shaw.ca_ (mailto:wlannon@shaw.ca) ]
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 12:28 PM
Subject: Re: Yak-List: Serial #/Build Date
of Batch # 40 from Factory # 320. There should be a small alum. plate
riveted on the forward side of the firewall on the RH side. It should also show
the date of manufacture. Each major airframe component also has the ID
plate. Walt
-----Original Message----- From: 727gs Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 6:24 AM
<_727gs@att.net_ (mailto:727gs@att.net) > I remember seeing a CJ serial # graph
somewhere that showed a manufacture date but I don't remember where it was. My
airplane: 4032009 Can someone point me in the right direction? Thanks in
advance. -------- Steve near Chicago Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=456388#456388
Message 10
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Questions for the Yak 55 operators. |
Pappy, in no way what-so-ever did I mean to imply you were/are "flippant".
I am happy to know that I was not missing some information on the B&C product
line. I am also very pleased to hear that the model that you have (SK-35) has
lasted as long as it has, as this confirms my experience as well, and it was
NOT an SK-10.
Yes, it broke my heart to hear about the oil shut-off valve. I remember it from
the first time you mentioned it.
You're lucky to have such a good relationship with Barrett!
Ignition: Is this Barrett's design? His fuel injection system also looks extremely
interesting.
Thank you for your extremely informative reply!
Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of cjpilot710@aol.com
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 2:39 PM
Subject: Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Yak-List: Questions for the Yak 55 operators.
Mark, and all,
This is what I get for making flippant remarks. Quite frankly its embarrassing
as hell. First of all in indorsing the B&C alternators - generally - I inadvertently
left the impression that I had a SD10 (from John B's question) on my
CJ's M-14. Then checking my log book to get the correct time in service, (again
way over stated in my endorsement) I wrote what was written (by me BTW) in
the log book - a "I-40 alternator". . That turns out to be wrong too.
Now with Marks post, I thought I better get my act together and the facts. I went
out and looked at the damn data plate on the alternator. You guessed it -
it says "SK-35". Hence why I have the LS1A too. Please don't ask me how I got
"I-40" (I have no F%$#^'n idea and its been 10 years). What I can attest to,
is that this alternator - a B&C SK-35 - with the exception of the coupler -
has given me perfect service for 756 hours.
Now for Richards question on the total time of my M-14. I purchased my engine
from AeroStar in 96. I was told it was one of the last 3 of the last production
run. Sam Saxs engine is one number different than mine as we purchased them
together.
In July 2000, at the 438 hour mark, I got a chip light. TMALSS we found #3 piston
had a scraper ring in the oil land. That brought into question were the other
pistons wrong also. In removing the rest of the cylinders we found them
all OK. So I scuffed the barrels, put in all rings and of course replaced #3
piston. In essence, a top overhaul.
At 1,532 hours I replaced #9 pistons rings.
At 1,582 hours I did another top over, where I sent the cylinders out Barrett,
who had to replace 3 of them for being out of tolerance.
At 1,805 the oil tank shutoff valve stuck closed (after some 1,000+ hours) and
because of a distraction, I didn't notice it until starting my run-up. The give
away was the prop would not cycle. So with some 223 hours on that top overhaul,
I had trashed the engine. I took the engine out to Barrett where he did
a complete zero time overhaul. Several cylinders were replaced due to damage.
Main bearings were changed due to wear. In the overhaul he installed total
seal piston rings and high compression pistons, which tested out at 388 hp. There
is now 1,975 hours on the engine since new or 170 hours since the overhaul
and is running fine.
The biggest and frustrating problem with this engine has been the ignition system
and once a Georgia kid on a crop dusting strip, point that the harness was
shorting out and I order Savorees auto harness, Ive had minimal problems since.
But than again I'm playing with an experimental electronic ignition system
right now.
I hope answered those questions and sorry about my rather exaggerated remarks.
Jim "Pappy" Goolsby
In a message dated 5/20/2016 11:25:03 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, mark.bitterlich@navy.mil
writes:
Pappy,
If I may bother you ..... you said you had the SD10, which I believe should have
been the SK10. But that small issue aside (it really doesn't matter), the
important thing is that you say here that you are running the LS1A voltage regulator.
That regulator will not work on a SD, or SK10. The LS1A is for the
SK-35 or SK-45 alternator, and also other models but in any case they are all
true alternators with a FIELD winding. The small 10 amp model does not have
a field winding to regulate it. Those others are also the ones that got the new
drive gear that you mentioned.
So since your airplane is the one that has all the hours, I would be curious to
know exactly what is on there. If you have the LS1A, you do not have the 10
amp version from B&C. So?
I cannot find an I-40 model. It may have been discontinued?
Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of cjpilot710@aol.com
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 6:03 PM
To: yak-list@matronics.com
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Yak-List: Questions for the Yak 55 operators.
Boy did I exaggerated that! (It seem the thing has been on there forever).
Anyway, I installed the M-14p engine our my CJ-6 in 12/97 new from AeroStar.
In 1/2006 at 1,150 hours engine time, I changed to the B&C I-40 alternator and
LSIA. So now at 1,906 hours on the engine the alternator actually has 756 hours
on it. I did have to change the (Teflon?) drive gear due to material failure
(B&C gave me new one with changed material because of the failures) but other
than that I've no absolutely no problems with my B&C. AAMOF, I still have
the old generator sitting on a shelf if anybody wants it. Only changed it to
save weight.
PS (As with old pilots, we tend to exaggerated lovers and landings) :-\
Jim "Pappy" Goolsby
In a message dated 5/19/2016 8:35:59 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, richard.goode@russianaeros.com
writes:
For my interest, is that 1800 hours on the same engine?
Richard Goode Aerobatics
Rhodds Farm
Lyonshall
Hereford
HR5 3LW
Tel: +44 (0) 1544 340120
Fax: +44 (0) 1544 340129
www.russianaeros.com
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of cjpilot710@aol.com
Sent: 19 May 2016 12:57
To: yak-list@matronics.com
Subject: Re: Yak-List: Questions for the Yak 55 operators.
I've had one on my M14p for over 1,800 hours with NO problems.
Jim "Pappy" Goolsby
In a message dated 5/18/2016 12:53:35 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, jbsoar@gmail.com <mailto:jbsoar@gmail.com> writes:
Who is operating a B&C SD10 alternator? How well does it work?
Also, does anyone have any weight and balance information regarding the
installation of a Scott 3200 tailwheel?
Thank you!
John B
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is
Message 11
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Looking for an experienced yak 52 mechanic in chicago Midwest region. Any s
uggestions.=C2-
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
Message 12
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: e: Yak-List: |
I recommend Avcraft in Columbus, NE. Ask for Keith or Bob. 402-564-7884.
Been using them for years. The do a great job.
Pumper
Sent from my iPad
> On May 20, 2016, at 3:25 PM, Robert Schwartz <schwartzcompany@att.net> wro
te:
>
> Looking for an experienced yak 52 mechanic in chicago Midwest region. Any s
uggestions.
>
>
> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
Message 13
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: e: Yak-List: |
Hmmmm, prior to my purchasing my airplane, those guys injected ACF-50 into
my air system, ultimately dissolving all the rubber in the check valves,
and other air components. No speculation, they thought it was such a good
idea they put in the log book.
Ernie
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Terry Calloway <terrycalloway@mac.com>
wrote:
> I recommend Avcraft in Columbus, NE. Ask for Keith or Bob. 402-564-7884.
> Been using them for years. The do a great job.
> Pumper
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On May 20, 2016, at 3:25 PM, Robert Schwartz <schwartzcompany@att.net>
> wrote:
>
> Looking for an experienced yak 52 mechanic in chicago Midwest region. Any
> suggestions.
>
>
> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
> <https://overview.mail.yahoo.com/mobile/?.src=Android>
>
>
Message 14
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: e: Yak-List: |
I'm sure they appreciate the complement from such a knowledgable source and s
tand by the original recommendation. Avcraft does a great job.
TC
Sent from my iPad
> On May 20, 2016, at 5:02 PM, Ernest Martinez <erniel29@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hmmmm, prior to my purchasing my airplane, those guys injected ACF-50 into
my air system, ultimately dissolving all the rubber in the check valves, an
d other air components. No speculation, they thought it was such a good idea
they put in the log book.
>
> Ernie
>
>> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Terry Calloway <terrycalloway@mac.com> w
rote:
>> I recommend Avcraft in Columbus, NE. Ask for Keith or Bob. 402-564-7884.
>> Been using them for years. The do a great job.
>> Pumper
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>>> On May 20, 2016, at 3:25 PM, Robert Schwartz <schwartzcompany@att.net> w
rote:
>>>
>>> Looking for an experienced yak 52 mechanic in chicago Midwest region. An
y suggestions.
>>>
>>>
>>> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
>
Message 15
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: e: Yak-List: |
Why thank you for that heart felt endorsement of my insights to aircraft
maintenance. I bet you're a Trump Supporter as well =F0=9F=98=AC
On Friday, May 20, 2016, Terry Calloway <terrycalloway@mac.com> wrote:
> I'm sure they appreciate the complement from such a knowledgable source
> and stand by the original recommendation. Avcraft does a great job.
> TC
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On May 20, 2016, at 5:02 PM, Ernest Martinez <erniel29@gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','erniel29@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>
> Hmmmm, prior to my purchasing my airplane, those guys injected ACF-50 int
o
> my air system, ultimately dissolving all the rubber in the check valves,
> and other air components. No speculation, they thought it was such a good
> idea they put in the log book.
>
> Ernie
>
> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Terry Calloway <terrycalloway@mac.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','terrycalloway@mac.com');>> wrote:
>
>> I recommend Avcraft in Columbus, NE. Ask for Keith or Bob. 402-564-7884.
>> Been using them for years. The do a great job.
>> Pumper
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> On May 20, 2016, at 3:25 PM, Robert Schwartz <schwartzcompany@att.net
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','schwartzcompany@att.net');>> wrote:
>>
>> Looking for an experienced yak 52 mechanic in chicago Midwest region. An
y
>> suggestions.
>>
>>
>> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
>> <https://overview.mail.yahoo.com/mobile/?.src=Android>
>>
>>
>
Message 16
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
A little north of you in Wisconsin. Roger Shaddick at KEGV
You may also check with John Shuttleworth at KHHG Indiana
On May 20, 2016, at 4:25 PM, Robert Schwartz <schwartzcompany@att.net<mailt
o:schwartzcompany@att.net>> wrote:
Looking for an experienced yak 52 mechanic in chicago Midwest region. Any s
uggestions.
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android<https://overview.mail.yahoo.com/mobile/?.sr
c=Android>
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|