Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 08:51 AM - Re: Pressure testing housai hoses (Richard Goode)
2. 09:05 AM - Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Yak 52 Operating Limitations (Bitterlich, Mark G CIV NAVAIR, WD)
3. 09:14 AM - Re: Pressure testing housai hoses (doug sapp)
4. 09:39 AM - AirVenture Invitation (Rico Jaeger)
5. 09:45 AM - Re: [Non-DoD Source] Yak tailwheel (Bitterlich, Mark G CIV NAVAIR, WD)
6. 10:02 AM - (Delfindriver)
7. 10:03 AM - Re: [Non-DoD Source] Yak tailwheel (Jan Mevis)
8. 02:26 PM - (schwartzcompany@att.net)
9. 02:50 PM - Re: (Robin Hou)
10. 03:58 PM - Re: (A. Dennis Savarese)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Pressure testing housai hoses |
We make new hoses for our customers, with our partner, Aerometal in Hungary,
and I assume the Russians use very similar operating pressures as the
Chinese. However we test new hoses at 100 bar (1500 PSI) - dramatically more
than the pressure in service, but we feel that is prudent.
Richard Goode Aerobatics
Rhodds Farm
Lyonshall
Hereford
HR5 3LW
Tel: +44 (0) 1544 340120
Fax: +44 (0) 1544 340129
www.russianaeros.com
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Harv
Sent: 05 June 2016 17:13
Subject: Yak-List: Pressure testing housai hoses
Looking for some info regarding pressure testing the flexible oil hoses on a
CJ6
What pressure would these require testing at in PSI?
Any tips and procedure you may have would I'd be interested to hear details.
Tia
Harv
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=456874#456874
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Yak 52 Operating Limitations |
First, let me say I am not disagreeing with anything Greg wrote. His stories and
advice are extremely accurate. But let me add what I believe is a good suggestion.
The very best thing a person can do when faced with this problem is to join the
EAA and go to them for help. For example: It is possible to remove the 300
mile limit on the Operating Limitations without changing anything else, if you
go about doing it properly and know exactly what is legal and what is not.
The FAA is very good at "interpreting" rules and regs in many different ways
depending on the FISDO. Thus it is best to never ask the FAA *ANYTHING*. Do
not ASK them to tell you how to do something. Know in advance and be prepared
to tell *THEM*. Of course be polite and if the conversation starts going south,
end it politely, then get your ducks in a row and call back with everything
right in front of you for reference. And who will help you with all this?
The Experimental Aircraft Association. If the FAA tells you some nonsense (and
they can), just relay that to the EAA and they will quote you paragraph and
verse, tell you where to find it, and if it gets REALLY bad, they will actually
call their FAA friends in D.C., and have THEM pass the correct info to the
particular FISDO. That is of course a last resort, but it is a POWERFUL resort
should you need it.
I'm willing to take it on the chin if someone really disagrees, but I am going
to go so far as to say that anyone with a Yak or CJ that is not a member of the
EAA really needs to rethink his or her logic. This organization is there to
support the exact kind of thing we all have spent a lot of money on and are basically
in love with. They are ready and willing to help every one of us, and
already have many times.
Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Greg Wrobel
Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2016 8:45 AM
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Yak-List: Yak 52 Operating Limitations
You can be in for a Bag of Worms. The FAR says you need to notify the Local FISDO
within 30 days that the aircraft has a new home base. As far as your operating
limitations, here is the rub. Depending on how your Operating Limitations
read, you may want to change them or you may want to leave them alone. Based on
what you wrote, I would change them. Remember, every FISDO is different and
none of them are consistent!! Three examples. I changed my "N" number. It required
new Operating Limitations and Airworthiness Certificate and an inspection
of my aircraft and logbooks by the FISDO . When my Limitations were redone,
I was able to remove my 300 mile limitation and the Limitations were brought
in line with the current regs. It was not a bad experience but you need to have
a good FISDO and be involved! Second example. A friend of mine brought a CJ
in from Washington state to Indiana. He notified the FISDO within 30 days of the
aircraft's new home and although the FISDO wanted to reissue the limitations,
my friend elected not to and I believe has the old 300 mile limitation. Third
example. Another friend of mine brought an aircraft in Florida and brought
it back to Tennessee. We notified the local FISDO within 30 days and they wanted
to see the limitations. Although we were OK with what was written, when they
were approved years prior, the FISDO for some reason put the owners name on
the Limitations. Our Local FISDO said we needed a new Operating Limitations
issued to remove the previous owners name (We could accept that reasoning). Well,
they brought them up to date with the current rules and my buddy jumped through
more hoops than a dog and clown act at a circus! The FISDO came out, inspected
the aircraft, logbooks, made some suggestions, asked a lot of questions
and the list goes on but in the end we "got er done". Remember, every FISDO
is different. Some are reasonable and use common sense and some think they
have been working for the FAA of Europe! Get together with someone in your area
that mi!
ght have
a CJ or YAK and go over the limitations. Read what the new 8130H has to say and
gets your ducks lined up. Be prepared to "Stand your ground" if necessary. My
local FISDO wanted me to comply with European AD's because there were none in
the Good Old U.S.A. I had to say that there was no requirement to comply with
Europe's AD's and he backed down but he initially had included them when he
rewrote my limitations!! Good luck. Be prepared and be educated before you start
the process. Congratulations on your new purchase. Your going to enjoy the
aircraft the the YAK / CJ Redstar community.
On Jun 3, 2016 6:49 PM, "ggtyler" <ggtyler@gmail.com> wrote:
Hey guys! New 52TW owner here, and trying to get everything sorted for moving
my plane to it's new home base in Placerville, CA.
I've done my research, but can't seem to find a definite answer on the operating
limitations.
I've filed the new program letter with my FSDO, but as far as I can tell FAA Memorandum
Deviation to order 8130.2G Section 10 states that I do not need to modify
or change the operating limitations to reflect the new home base.
http://www.warbirds-eaa.org/forms/7Deviation%20Memo%20PDF.pdf
According to Part 4107 (D) "All previously issued airworthiness certificates and
operating limitations will remain valid".
Question 1: Do I need to file an amendment to the operation limitations to show
me as the the new pilot? Or is my program letter sufficient for that? The operating
limitations to not list a home base.
Question 2: The operation limitations state that "proficiency flights are limited
to a nonstop flight that begin and end at the aircraft's home base airport.
An alternate airport selection is not permitted for this aircraft. (exceptions
are made for formation flying, training or pilot checkout, as long as I notify
my local FSDO) Does this mean I can not fly to another local airport for
takeoff and landing practice? Do I need to notify my FSDO ever time I intend
to land at another airport?
Thanks for any help or advise you can offer. Really appreciate I've already learned
by lurking here on these forums.
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=456827#456827
==========
List" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
==========
FORUMS -
eferrer" target="_blank">http://forums.matronics.com
==========
WIKI -
errer" target="_blank">http://wiki.matronics.com
==========
b Site -
-Matt Dralle, List Admin.
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
==========
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Pressure testing housai hoses |
I would have to agree with Richard, any hose assemblies or valves which we
make or overhaul "in house" are tested to at least 1000 psi. That said, I
would not recommend such a test to determine the airworthiness of old hoses.
Doug
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Richard Goode <
richard.goode@russianaeros.com> wrote:
> richard.goode@russianaeros.com>
>
> We make new hoses for our customers, with our partner, Aerometal in
> Hungary,
> and I assume the Russians use very similar operating pressures as the
> Chinese. However we test new hoses at 100 bar (1500 PSI) - dramatically
> more
> than the pressure in service, but we feel that is prudent.
>
> Richard Goode Aerobatics
> Rhodds Farm
> Lyonshall
> Hereford
> HR5 3LW
>
> Tel: +44 (0) 1544 340120
> Fax: +44 (0) 1544 340129
> www.russianaeros.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com
> [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Harv
> Sent: 05 June 2016 17:13
> To: yak-list@matronics.com
> Subject: Yak-List: Pressure testing housai hoses
>
>
> Looking for some info regarding pressure testing the flexible oil hoses on
> a
> CJ6
>
> What pressure would these require testing at in PSI?
>
> Any tips and procedure you may have would I'd be interested to hear
> details.
>
> Tia
> Harv
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=456874#456874
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
> MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
>
>
Message 4
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | AirVenture Invitation |
Redstars,
Just a quick reminder to RSVP regarding the Formation Clinic in Wausau, WI
(AUW) the week / weekend prior to AirVenture - THE MORE - THE MERRIER!! It'
s a blast and they treat us like gold!
AND the following week...
...when you're soaking up all that is AirVenture, be sure to visit the infa
mous SOS BEER TENT where honest-to-goodness fighter pilots rub elbows w/ al
l of us who fly in their shadows! They fly SORTIES, and I fly, well...SORTA
. But stop-in there ESPECIALLY on Tuesday evening when my band, "Sonic Circ
us" is playing! If you DO make it, say "hi" to the lead singer (me) and let
's have a toast to "the most wonderful time of the year!" Always great to m
eet old and new aviation friends!
https://www.facebook.com/soniccircusband/
Sonic Circus - Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/soniccircusband/>
www.facebook.com
Sonic Circus. 3,286 likes =B7 24 talking about this. Three time WAMI winnin
g Cover Band of the Year!
The honor would be all MINE!
Blue skies, tailwinds and cheap gas,
Rico Jaeger
915 S. 11th Ave.
Wausau, WI. 54401
715.529.7426
//
1966 Cessna 150F ^/---//-X
N8558G //
Hangar #35 / AUW
//
1992 Yakovlev Yak 52 ^/---//-X
N21YK //
Hangar #21 / AUW
Message 5
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Dan, it's been awhile since I have done it and I remember it stumped me too.
My memory says, you let all the air out of the tire as well as removing the valve
so there is NO air in the tire. Then you can use a vise (or even in some
cases two hands, or some BIG Channel Lock pliers) and squeeze the wheel from both
sides. When you do this, a round steel ring retainer will fall out of the
one side. When this happens, the wheel will just come apart in two halves.
You do NOT "unscrew it". It just pulls apart evenly.
Once you see it happen, you will slap yourself on the forehead! At least I did.
Glad to see someone else has a hard time figuring it out. If you look carefully,
you should see the steel ring on one side that we are talking about.
Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Dan caldwell
Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2016 11:15 PM
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Yak-List: Yak tailwheel
I am stumped as to how the Yak 55M tailwheel hub comes apart. My tire is worn and
I need to change it.
I took both circlips off but they only seem to retain the roller bearings. There
is a retainer ring with three indentations on it.
Do I need a special tool to unscrew it?
Dan Caldwell
Message 6
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Can someone post the emergency gear blow down test procedure to avoid the
gear slamming down or up. I recall first bleed main air to equal or lower
than emergency side
Bob
Message 7
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Yak tailwheel |
Ive seen East-bloc mechanics put a girder on the wheel (flat on the
ground of course) and then advance with a car on that girder
Jan
On 06/06/16 18:45, "Bitterlich, Mark G CIV NAVAIR, WD"
<owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com on behalf of
mark.bitterlich@navy.mil> wrote:
><mark.bitterlich@navy.mil>
>
>Dan, it's been awhile since I have done it and I remember it stumped me
>too. My memory says, you let all the air out of the tire as well as
>removing the valve so there is NO air in the tire. Then you can use a
>vise (or even in some cases two hands, or some BIG Channel Lock pliers)
>and squeeze the wheel from both sides. When you do this, a round steel
>ring retainer will fall out of the one side. When this happens, the
>wheel will just come apart in two halves. You do NOT "unscrew it". It
>just pulls apart evenly.
>
>Once you see it happen, you will slap yourself on the forehead! At least
>I did. Glad to see someone else has a hard time figuring it out. If
>you look carefully, you should see the steel ring on one side that we are
>talking about.
>
>Mark
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com
>[mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Dan caldwell
>Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2016 11:15 PM
>To: Yak-List Digest List
>Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Yak-List: Yak tailwheel
>
>
>I am stumped as to how the Yak 55M tailwheel hub comes apart. My tire is
>worn and I need to change it.
>I took both circlips off but they only seem to retain the roller
>bearings. There is a retainer ring with three indentations on it.
>Do I need a special tool to unscrew it?
>Dan Caldwell
>
>
Message 8
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Can someone post the emergency gear blow down test on jacks procedure to avoid
the gear slamming down or up. I recall first bleed main air to equal or lower
than emergency side
Bob
Get Outlook for Android
Message 9
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: e: Yak-List: |
For Dennis website:Maintenance
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
| |
Maintenance
| |
|
|
On Monday, June 6, 2016 2:39 PM, "schwartzcompany@att.net" <schwartzcompany@att.net>
wrote:
Can someone post the emergency gear blow down test on jacks procedure to avoid
the gear slamming down or up. I recall first bleed main air to equal or lower
than emergency side
Bob
Get Outlook for Android
Message 10
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Go to my web site, www.yak-52.com and download it.
Dennis
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 6, 2016, at 5:23 PM, schwartzcompany@att.net wrote:
>
>
> Can someone post the emergency gear blow down test on jacks procedure to a
void the gear slamming down or up. I recall first bleed main air to equal or
lower than emergency side
> Bob
>
>
> Get Outlook for Android
==========================
==========================
==========================
==========================
==========================
==========================
==========================
============
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|