Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 01:50 AM - Re: UK Yak 52 crash (Richard Goode)
2. 05:49 AM - Re: UK Yak 52 crash (JON)
3. 09:39 AM - Re: M14 engine sale (Re: Thread Hi-Jacking (Bitterlich, Mark G CIV NAVAIR, WD)
4. 09:43 AM - Re: [Non-DoD Source] M14 engine sale (Re: Thread Hi-Jacking (Bitterlich, Mark G CIV NAVAIR, WD)
5. 07:05 PM - Yak 50 tailwheel fork upper bushings (John Warwick)
6. 08:28 PM - Re: Yak-18T Part (Patrick Ashura)
7. 09:14 PM - Re: Yak-18T Part (Royden Heays)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
The accident is under investigation by the UK AAIB but what I can say is
that the aircraft was being operated by the Empire Test Pilots School;
it had engine failure and the crew attempted a downwind landing but the
aircraft actually impacted one wing down (possibly stalled) and then
cart wheeled. The front cockpit occupant was thrown out with the impact
and killed, while the rear cockpit occupant suffered leg and other
injuries.
Clearly more information will become available.
Richard Goode Aerobatics
Rhodds Farm
Lyonshall
Hereford
HR5 3LW
Tel: +44 (0) 1544 340120
Fax: +44 (0) 1544 340129
www.russianaeros.com
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Byron Fox
Sent: 11 July 2016 04:34
Subject: Yak-List: UK Yak 52 crash
>From Salisbury newspaper:
"A MAN has died in a plane crash near Dinton today.
The light aircraft came down in a field near the village with two men on
board.
One man was pronounced dead at the scene while a second man was cut free
from the wreckage with a leg injury, South West Ambulance Service
confirmed. It is understood the bright yellow and blue, civilian Yak-52
light aircraft was headed to Boscombe Down after taking off at around
10.15am.
It is also believed the plane was being used by the Empire Test Pilot
School. The survivor was flown to Salisbury District Hospital via air
ambulance".
Blitz Fox
415-307-2405
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by <http://www.mailscanner.info/> MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: UK Yak 52 crash |
Very sad news...
=C2-
As with most accidents, the best thing we can do is learn and try to preven
t the next one.=C2- That said, very curious as to how/why the front seate
r was ejected upon impact.=C2-
=C2-
JB
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Goode" <richard.goode@russianaeros.com>
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2016 3:49:14 AM
Subject: RE: Yak-List: UK Yak 52 crash
The accident is under investigation by the UK AAIB but what I can say is th
at the aircraft was being operated by the Empire Test Pilots School; it had
engine failure and the crew attempted a downwind landing but the aircraft
actually impacted one wing down (possibly stalled) and then cart wheeled. T
he front cockpit occupant was thrown out with the impact and killed, while
the rear cockpit occupant suffered leg and other injuries.
=C2-
Clearly more information will become available.
=C2-
Richard Goode Aerobatics
Rhodds Farm
Lyonshall
Hereford
HR5 3LW
=C2-
Tel:=C2- +44 (0) 1544 340120
Fax: +44 (0) 1544 340129
www.russianaeros.com
=C2-
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@mat
ronics.com] On Behalf Of Byron Fox
Sent: 11 July 2016 04:34
Subject: Yak-List: UK Yak 52 crash
=C2-
>From Salisbury newspaper:
=C2-
"A MAN has died in a plane crash near Dinton today.
The light aircraft came down in a field near the village with two men on bo
ard.
One man was pronounced dead at the scene while a second man was cut free fr
om the wreckage with a leg injury, South West=C2-Ambulance Service confir
med.=C2-It is understood the bright yellow and blue, civilian Yak-52 ligh
t aircraft was headed to Boscombe Down after taking off at around 10.15am.
It is also believed the plane was being used by the Empire Test Pilot Schoo
l. The survivor was flown to Salisbury District Hospital via air ambulance"
.
Blitz Fox
415-307-2405
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner , and is
believed to be clean.
Message 3
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | re: M14 engine sale (re: Thread Hi-Jacking |
Bitterlich Just for your trivial pursuit.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Roger Kemp
Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2016 9:31 PM
Subject: Re: Yak-List: [Non-DoD Source] M14 engine sale (re: Thread Hi-Jacking
We can tell you but then we'll have to kill ya.
Doc
Sent from my iPad
On Jul 8, 2016, at 10:15 PM, Jon Blake <jblake207@comcast.net> wrote:
When he (Bitterlick) replied earlier using official the DoD email the system
(US Navy) it automatically inserted the "Non-DoD Source" statement... this
is intended to alert official email users of unofficial or non DoD traffic.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID
William Geipel <l129bs@gmail.com> wrote:
Not to start any in-breeding or fighting, but what is the reason for the
Non-DoD Source blah blah?
On Jul 8, 2016, at 11:33, KingCJ6@aol.com wrote:
Hopefully while wearing a flight suit!!
In a message dated 7/8/2016 10:29:31 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
f16viperdoc@me.com writes:
Have you decided yet? Offended or not? Relax, sit back,
take a breath, and pop a cap on a cool MMO. Let the aromatic red fluid flow through
your crevasses. Pretty soon those chunks of carbon will be falling and
fouling your filters for elimination from your system with your next change. There
feel better?
Doc
Sent from my iPad
> On Jul 6, 2016, at 2:35 PM, Bitterlich, Mark G CIV NAVAIR,
WD <mark.bitterlich@navy.mil> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> I think I am offended. Let me think about it and I'll
get back to you.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Ernest Martinez
> Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2016 3:25 PM
> To: yak-list
> Subject: Re: Yak-List: [Non-DoD Source] M14 engine sale
(re: Thread Hi-Jacking
>
> The horse lives!
>
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Bitterlich, Mark G CIV
NAVAIR, WD <mark.bitterlich@navy.mil> wrote:
>
>
>
> Regardless of who's feelings got hurt, regardless
of those that do not understand the term "with all due respect", regardless
of those that don't understand "it was a joke", regardless of those that are
afraid to ask questions, regardless of those who feel that their questions were
not answered with the proper "tone of voice"..... all that aside .....
>
> I think the most important question is this:
Of everyone here that asks and answers questions, whether they be brand new,
or old timers .... how many contribute cash money to Matt Dralle every year so
this list (and a ton of others) can be maintained to the benefit of all concerned?
>
> If you have ... GREAT! Because we *ALL* should.
To those that have not contributed one red cent and have the gonads to come
on this list and complain about ANYTHING AT ALL ..... well, good luck with
that and I can guess who you're voting for. And by the way, this is called
"Opening Pandora's Box".
>
> Big smile... Big smile.
>
>
>
>
> ==========
> List" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
> ==========
> FORUMS -
> eferrer" target="_blank">http://forums.matronics.com
> ==========
> WIKI -
> errer" target="_blank">http://wiki.matronics.com
> ==========
> b Site -
> -Matt Dralle, List Admin.
> rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
> ==========
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ========================e ties Day =======================
- MATRONICS WEB FORUMS =======================
- NEW MATRONICS LIST WIKI -
Message 4
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | [Non-DoD Source] M14 engine sale (re: Thread Hi-Jacking |
So is my salary. Appreciate it Bill.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of William Geipel
Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2016 2:00 AM
Subject: Re: Yak-List: [Non-DoD Source] M14 engine sale (re: Thread Hi-Jacking
so all this email is on system we pay for? Hillary?
Oh my.
On Jul 8, 2016, at 21:15, Jon Blake <jblake207@comcast.net> wrote:
When he (Bitterlick) replied earlier using official the DoD email the system
(US Navy) it automatically inserted the "Non-DoD Source" statement... this
is intended to alert official email users of unofficial or non DoD traffic.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID
William Geipel <l129bs@gmail.com> wrote:
Not to start any in-breeding or fighting, but what is the reason for the
Non-DoD Source blah blah?
On Jul 8, 2016, at 11:33, KingCJ6@aol.com wrote:
Hopefully while wearing a flight suit!!
In a message dated 7/8/2016 10:29:31 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
f16viperdoc@me.com writes:
Have you decided yet? Offended or not? Relax, sit back,
take a breath, and pop a cap on a cool MMO. Let the aromatic red fluid flow through
your crevasses. Pretty soon those chunks of carbon will be falling and
fouling your filters for elimination from your system with your next change. There
feel better?
Doc
Sent from my iPad
> On Jul 6, 2016, at 2:35 PM, Bitterlich, Mark G CIV NAVAIR,
WD <mark.bitterlich@navy.mil> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> I think I am offended. Let me think about it and I'll
get back to you.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Ernest Martinez
> Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2016 3:25 PM
> To: yak-list
> Subject: Re: Yak-List: [Non-DoD Source] M14 engine sale
(re: Thread Hi-Jacking
>
> The horse lives!
>
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Bitterlich, Mark G CIV
NAVAIR, WD <mark.bitterlich@navy.mil> wrote:
>
>
>
> Regardless of who's feelings got hurt, regardless
of those that do not understand the term "with all due respect", regardless
of those that don't understand "it was a joke", regardless of those that are
afraid to ask questions, regardless of those who feel that their questions were
not answered with the proper "tone of voice"..... all that aside .....
>
> I think the most important question is this:
Of everyone here that asks and answers questions, whether they be brand new,
or old timers .... how many contribute cash money to Matt Dralle every year so
this list (and a ton of others) can be maintained to the benefit of all concerned?
>
> If you have ... GREAT! Because we *ALL* should.
To those that have not contributed one red cent and have the gonads to come
on this list and complain about ANYTHING AT ALL ..... well, good luck with
that and I can guess who you're voting for. And by the way, this is called
"Opening Pandora's Box".
>
> Big smile... Big smile.
>
>
>
>
> ==========
> List" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
> ==========
> FORUMS -
> eferrer" target="_blank">http://forums.matronics.com <http://forums.matronics.com/>
> ==========
> WIKI -
> errer" target="_blank">http://wiki.matronics.com <http://wiki.matronics.com/>
> ==========
> b Site -
> -Matt Dralle, List Admin.
> rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
> ==========
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ========================e ties Day =======================
- MATRONICS WEB FORUMS =======================
- NEW MATRONICS LIST WIKI -
Message 5
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Yak 50 tailwheel fork upper bushings |
Your Yak 50 tailwheel fork have excessive play ?
Locally-made Yak 50 tailwheel fork upper bushings available.
2 pcs shown. More available. Ships anywhere from CA 92020
Bushing OD going into the tube is a press fit. You will have about .001"
interference to remove off the ID with a hone to achieve the desired fit
onto the fork.
Please contact me off list or 619 933-2571.
John
Message 6
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Yak-18T Part |
Royden,
Thanks so much for your info on sanding the '52 pop off piston to fit the 18
T. Works perfectly!
PJ Ashura
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 8, 2016, at 10:08 AM, doug sapp <dougsappllc@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The valve plunger inside the CJ pop off valve measures 0.4900 tall (12.45m
m) and 0.4680 (11.89mm) dia.
>
> I show 54 in stock, order p/n H2-5502-10 @$20.00 each
>
> Best from here,
> Doug
>
>> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 7:50 AM, A. Dennis Savarese <dsavarese0812@bellsou
th.net> wrote:
outh.net>
>>
>> Now that was a brilliant idea Royden! I mean that sincerely.
>> /-- //
>> /
>> //A. Dennis Savarese //
>> //334-546-8182 (mobile)//
>> //www.yak-52.com //
>> //Skype - Yakguy1//
>>
>>> On 7/8/2016 9:26 AM, Heaysr wrote:
>>>
>>> The Yak55 piston for the pop off valve is slightly smaller that for the Y
ak 52 as supplied by Jill at M14P. I mounted the piston on a wooden dowel an
d put the dowel in an electric drill as spun the piston walls against emery p
aper to turn the piston down to size. It works just fine. It's been 8 years n
ow.
>>>
>>> Royden Heays
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: Patrick Ashura <pjsales@me.com>
>>> To: yak-list@matronics.com
>>> Sent: Thu, 07 Jul 2016 18:43:57 -0600 (MDT)
>>> Subject: Yak-List: Yak-18T Part
>>>
>>>
>>> Guys,
>>>
>>> I need the pop off valve piston (with the rubber end) for my Yak-18T. It
is a slightly smaller diameter than the one for the '52. Any help would be g
reatly appreciated!
>>>
>>> PJ Ashura
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>>
>> ==========
>> List" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navig
ator?Yak-List
>> ==========
>> FORUMS -
>> eferrer" target="_blank">http://forums.matronics.com
>> ==========
>> WIKI -
>> errer" target="_blank">http://wiki.matronics.com
>> ==========
>> b Site -
>> -Matt Dralle, List Admin.
>> rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contributio
n
>> ==========
>
Message 7
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Hi PJ,
Glad to be able to return some help to the Yak community who have helped
me so much over the years.
Regards
Royden
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Patrick Ashura
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2016 8:27 PM
Subject: Re: Yak-List: Yak-18T Part
Royden,
Thanks so much for your info on sanding the '52 pop off piston to fit
the 18T. Works perfectly!
PJ Ashura
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 8, 2016, at 10:08 AM, doug sapp <dougsappllc@gmail.com
<mailto:dougsappllc@gmail.com> > wrote:
The valve plunger inside the CJ pop off valve measures 0.4900 tall
(12.45mm) and 0.4680 (11.89mm) dia.
I show 54 in stock, order p/n H2-5502-10 @$20.00 each
Best from here,
Doug
On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 7:50 AM, A. Dennis Savarese
<dsavarese0812@bellsouth.net <mailto:dsavarese0812@bellsouth.net> >
wrote:
<dsavarese0812@bellsouth.net <mailto:dsavarese0812@bellsouth.net> >
Now that was a brilliant idea Royden! I mean that sincerely.
/-- //
/
//A. Dennis Savarese //
//334-546-8182 <tel:334-546-8182> (mobile)//
//www.yak-52.com <http://www.yak-52.com> //
//Skype - Yakguy1//
On 7/8/2016 9:26 AM, Heaysr wrote:
<mailto:heaysr@telus.net> >
The Yak55 piston for the pop off valve is slightly smaller that for the
Yak 52 as supplied by Jill at M14P. I mounted the piston on a wooden
dowel and put the dowel in an electric drill as spun the piston walls
against emery paper to turn the piston down to size. It works just fine.
It's been 8 years now.
Royden Heays
----- Original Message -----
From: Patrick Ashura <pjsales@me.com <mailto:pjsales@me.com> >
Sent: Thu, 07 Jul 2016 18:43:57 -0600 (MDT)
Subject: Yak-List: Yak-18T Part
<mailto:pjsales@me.com> >
Guys,
I need the pop off valve piston (with the rubber end) for my Yak-18T. It
is a slightly smaller diameter than the one for the '52. Any help would
be greatly appreciated!
PJ Ashura
Sent from my iPad
List" rel="noreferrer"
target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
FORUMS -
eferrer" target="_blank">http://forums.matronics.com
WIKI -
errer" target="_blank">http://wiki.matronics.com
b Site -
-Matt Dralle, List Admin.
rel="noreferrer"
target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|