Yak-List Digest Archive

Fri 08/19/16


Total Messages Posted: 24



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 01:19 AM - Re: Yak-52 Max Altitude (Robin Hou)
     2. 06:39 AM - Flour Bombing (Philip Nicholson)
     3. 07:42 AM - Re: Flour Bombing (Mark Davis)
     4. 08:45 AM - Re: Flour Bombing (Jon Blake)
     5. 08:45 AM - Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Yak-52 Max Altitude (Bitterlich, Mark G CIV NAVAIR, WD)
     6. 09:27 AM - Re: WTB: CJ-6 (nylbrooks)
     7. 11:39 AM - Re: Yak-52 Max Altitude (cjpilot710)
     8. 11:42 AM - Re: Yak-52 Max Altitude (cjpilot710)
     9. 11:57 AM - Re: Flour Bombing (cjpilot710)
    10. 01:31 PM - Re: Yak-52 Max Altitude (Roger Kemp)
    11. 01:33 PM - Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Yak-52 Max Altitude (Roger Kemp)
    12. 01:54 PM - Re: Yak-52 Max Altitude (Roger Kemp)
    13. 03:16 PM - Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Flour Bombing (Bitterlich, Mark G CIV NAVAIR, WD)
    14. 03:21 PM - Re: Flour Bombing (Bill Lang)
    15. 03:52 PM - Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Flour Bombing (William Halverson)
    16. 04:32 PM - Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Flour Bombing (Roger Kemp)
    17. 05:39 PM - Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Flour Bombing (Rico Jaeger)
    18. 05:52 PM - Re: WTB: CJ-6 (n38139)
    19. 05:52 PM - Contact Info (n38139)
    20. 06:04 PM - Re: Yak-52 Max Altitude (Tom Elliott)
    21. 07:53 PM - Flower bombing and more (Richard Goode)
    22. 08:34 PM - Re: Yak-52 Max Altitude (William Halverson)
    23. 10:57 PM - Re: Flower bombing and more (Jan Mevis)
    24. 11:01 PM - Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Flour Bombing (Jan Mevis)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:19:22 AM PST US
    From: Robin Hou <rmhou@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: Yak-52 Max Altitude
    Light weight (less than 2000 lb; Nie 17 loaded is only 1232 lb), low wing loading (less than 8 lb/sqft). via CloudMagic Email [https://cloudmagic. com/k/d/mailapp?ct=pa&cv=8.4.40&pv=5.1&source=email_footer_2] On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 10:35 PM, Jan Mevis < jan.mevis@informavia.be [jan. mevis@informavia.be] > wrote: So if it takes a long time to get higher than 14500 feet with a Yak or a CJ, how did the aces in WW I do it with their albatrosses, sopwiths, nieuports and the like, up to 20000 feet or 6 kilometers? From: < owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] > on behalf of Jon Blake < jblake207@comcast.net [jblake207@comcast.net] > yak-list@matronics.com [yak-list@matronics.com] " < yak-list@matronics.com [yak-list@matronics.com] > yak-list@matronics.com [yak-list@matronics.com] > Subject: Re: Yak-List: Yak-52 Max Altitude Well, I've had my stock, 285HP CJ to 14,501 feet and she was willing to go even higher, but I didn't want to embarrass the YAK52 I was flying wing on... JB Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID Dave Jester < wdjester@cox.net [wdjester@cox.net] > wrote: I have been to 14,500 feet in my 52TD Termikas conversion. Sluggish on the controls that high. Or maybe I was suffering from hypoxia and I was the one sluggish! It was neat when a regional jet passed me 500 feet below. :) On Aug 18, 2016, at 2:48 AM, Mike Beresford < mike_beresford@yahoo.co.uk [mike_beresford@yahoo.co.uk] > wrote: Hi all I've seen a maximum operating altitude for the Yak-52 quoted as 4,000 m (13,000 ft). Obviously this requires pilot oxygen, but is the altitude limitation due to operational procedures, or a technical limitation on the aircraft? Someone suggested to me that the fuel mixture compensation may run out of travel above the altitude limit. Anyone have some insight into the behaviour of the engine above 13,000 ft? Blue skies Mike


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:39:20 AM PST US
    From: Philip Nicholson <pednicholson@gmail.com>
    Subject: Flour Bombing
    Hi guys, There=99s a flour bombing competition at the local strip next weekend . Does anyone have any clever ideas on releasing the bag of flour? Surely there=99s a better way than simply heaving it over the side onto the wing and having it slide of. Secondly, does anyone have any tactics they wish to share? i.e., how many feet in front of the target to release wheth er to =98toss=99 it or approach level etc? Any formulas? J Never done it before so any input welcome. Phil N. Nanchang =93 CJ6A C-FEPN - Ottawa


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:42:13 AM PST US
    From: "Mark Davis" <markdavis@wbsnet.org>
    Subject: Flour Bombing
    Phil, It all depends on the shape/weight of the "bomb" and whatever course rules they set up for the bombing, such as minimum altitude, airspeed, dive angle (if any allowed). So the best chance is to find out those parameters, make your own practice "bombs" and go see what works. Chucking them over the side works fine particularly if you have a GIB, but they have to be consistent on how they throw it over the side and make sure it's thrown out the same side every time to be able to predict the effect of prop wash. For YAKs if prefer the left side so the prop wash is pushing down to lessen the chance of hitting the horizontal stab. The pilot has to be very consistent with altitude/airspeed and then look for clues as to wind direction/velocity to make corrections. With a little practice at YAK/CJ speeds you can get pretty accurate. I also suggest taking a roll of masking tape along to reinforce whatever bombs you're given so you don't have to clean flour out of the aft cockpit when one "explodes" prematurely as it enters the slipstream. Fly Navy, Mark Davis N44YK From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Philip Nicholson Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 7:37 AM Subject: Yak-List: Flour Bombing Hi guys, There=99s a flour bombing competition at the local strip next weekend. Does anyone have any clever ideas on releasing the bag of flour? Surely there=99s a better way than simply heaving it over the side onto the wing and having it slide of. Secondly, does anyone have any tactics they wish to share? i.e., how many feet in front of the target to release whether to =98toss=99 it or approach level etc? Any formulas? J Never done it before so any input welcome. Phil N. Nanchang =93 CJ6A C-FEPN - Ottawa


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:45:33 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Flour Bombing
    From: Jon Blake <jblake207@comcast.net>
    UGhpbCwgY29uc3RhbnRzIGFyZSB0aGUga2V5Li4uIGxldmVsIGFsdGl0dWRlIGFuZCBjb25zdGFu dCBncm91bmQgc3BlZWQuIEhhdmluZyBzb21lb25lIG9uIHRoZSBncm91bmQgZ2l2aW5nIHlvdSBh IGJhdHRsZSBkYW1hZ2UgYXNzZXNzbWVudCBpcyB2aXRhbC4gUGljayBhIHNwZWVkICgxMTApIGFu ZCBhbHRpdHVkZSAoMjAwKSBhbmQgYXMgdGhlIHRhcmdldCBkaXNhcHBlYXJzIHVuZGVyIHRoZSBs ZWFkaW5nIGVkZ2Ugd2luZyBpZiByZWxlYXNpbmcgZnJvbSBiYWNrIHNlYXQgb3IgdGhlIG5vc2Ug aWYgZnJvbSBmcm9udCBzZWF0IHRvc3MgZG93biBhbmQgYWZ0Li4uIHRoZW4gYWRqdXN0IGF6aW11 dGggYW5kIHJlbGVhc2UgcG9pbnQgYmFzZWQgb24gQkRBIHJlcG9ydCBmcm9tIHRoZSBncm91bmQg Z3V5LiAgQW5vdGhlciB0ZWNobmlxdWUgaXMgdG8gZGl2ZSB0b3dhcmRzIGEgcG9pbnQganVzdCBi ZXlvbmQgdGhlIHRhcmdldC4uLm1heWJlIDIwLTMwIGZlZXQgYW5kIHRyeSB0byBtYWludGFpbiBh IGNvbnN0YW50IHNwZWVkIGluIHRoZSBkaXZlIGFuZCByZWxlYXNlIGF0IDI1MCBmZWV0IG9yIGp1 c3QgYXMgeW91J3JlIHB1bGxpbmcgb3V0LiBDQVVUSU9OLi4uIFRBUkdFVCBGSVhBVElPTiBJUyBB IFJFQUwgREFOR0VSIEFORCBZT1UnTEwgQlVTVCBUSEUgSEFSRCBERUNLIE9SIFlPVVIgQVNTLiBU aGlzIGRpdmUgYm9tYiB0ZWNobmlxdWUgaXMgbGVzcyBhY2N1cmF0ZSBhbmQgaGlnaGVyIHJpc2sg aW4gbXkgb3Bpbmlvbi4gQW5kIGZpbmFsbHkgdGhlIGJlc3QgdGVjaG5pcXVlIGZvciBhIHdpbm5p bmcgc2NvcmUgaXMgdG8gYnJpYmUgdGhlIGp1ZGdlLi4uIEdvb2QgbHVjay4gU2FiZXIKClNlbnQg ZnJvbSBteSBWZXJpem9uIFdpcmVsZXNzIDRHIExURSBEUk9JRAoKUGhpbGlwIE5pY2hvbHNvbiA8 cGVkbmljaG9sc29uQGdtYWlsLmNvbT4gd3JvdGU6Cgo+SGkgZ3V5cywKPgo+VGhlcmXigJlzIGEg ZmxvdXIgYm9tYmluZyBjb21wZXRpdGlvbiBhdCB0aGUgbG9jYWwgc3RyaXAgbmV4dCB3ZWVrZW5k Lgo+Cj5Eb2VzIGFueW9uZSBoYXZlIGFueSBjbGV2ZXIgaWRlYXMgb24gcmVsZWFzaW5nIHRoZSBi YWcgb2YgZmxvdXI/IFN1cmVseSB0aGVyZeKAmXMgYSBiZXR0ZXIgd2F5IHRoYW4gc2ltcGx5IGhl YXZpbmcgaXQgb3ZlciB0aGUgc2lkZSBvbnRvIHRoZSB3aW5nIGFuZCBoYXZpbmcgaXQgc2xpZGUg b2YuIFNlY29uZGx5LCBkb2VzIGFueW9uZSBoYXZlIGFueSB0YWN0aWNzIHRoZXkgd2lzaCB0byBz aGFyZT8gaS5lLiwgaG93IG1hbnkgZmVldCBpbiBmcm9udCBvZiB0aGUgdGFyZ2V0IHRvIHJlbGVh c2XigKYgd2hldGhlciB0byDigJh0b3Nz4oCZIGl0IG9yIGFwcHJvYWNoIGxldmVsIGV0Yz8gQW55 IGZvcm11bGFzPyBKCj4KPk5ldmVyIGRvbmUgaXQgYmVmb3JlIHNvIGFueSBpbnB1dCB3ZWxjb21l Lgo+Cj7CoAo+Cj5QaGlsIE4uCj4KPk5hbmNoYW5nIOKAkyBDSjZBCj4KPkMtRkVQTiAtIE90dGF3 YQo+Cg=


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:45:45 AM PST US
    From: "Bitterlich, Mark G CIV NAVAIR, WD" <mark.bitterlich@navy.mil>
    Subject: Re: Yak-52 Max Altitude
    I've had my YAK-50 up to 17,500 (on oxygen by the way), just to see if I could do it. It wasn't climbing very fast, but still had way more to go. I stopped because I was too darn cold, and I was not IFR equipped. Of course I've never found a CJ that could keep up with me in any regard, so there is that. :-) Except for the cockpit heater of course. Mark -----Original Message----- From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jon Blake Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 6:01 PM Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Yak-List: Yak-52 Max Altitude Well, I've had my stock, 285HP CJ to 14,501 feet and she was willing to go even higher, but I didn't want to embarrass the YAK52 I was flying wing on... JB Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID Dave Jester <wdjester@cox.net> wrote: I have been to 14,500 feet in my 52TD Termikas conversion. Sluggish on the controls that high. Or maybe I was suffering from hypoxia and I was the one sluggish! It was neat when a regional jet passed me 500 feet below. :) On Aug 18, 2016, at 2:48 AM, Mike Beresford <mike_beresford@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: Hi all I've seen a maximum operating altitude for the Yak-52 quoted as 4,000 m (13,000 ft). Obviously this requires pilot oxygen, but is the altitude limitation due to operational procedures, or a technical limitation on the aircraft? Someone suggested to me that the fuel mixture compensation may run out of travel above the altitude limit. Anyone have some insight into the behaviour of the engine above 13,000 ft? Blue skies Mike


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:27:20 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: WTB: CJ-6
    From: "nylbrooks" <nylbrooks@roadrunner.com>
    Contact Information? Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=459654#459654


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:39:23 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Yak-52 Max Altitude
    From: cjpilot710 <cjpilot710@aol.com>
    CiAgICAKUmVtZW1iZXIgdGhhdCBTaXIgSGlsbGFyeSBhbmQgaGlzIFNoZXJwYSBndWlkZSwgY2xp bWJlZCBNdCBFdmVyZXN0ICgyOSwwMDApIHdpdGggb3V0IHRoZSB1c2Ugb2Ygb3h5Z2VuLiDCoEkg d291bGQgc3RpbGwgZG91YnQgdGhlIGFjY3VyYWN5IG9mIHRoZSBlYXJseSBmbGlnaHQgaW5zdHJ1 bWVudHMuIMKgQnV0IHdhcyBzdGlsbCBwbGF1c2libGUuCgoKU2VudCB2aWEgdGhlIFNhbXN1bmcg R0FMQVhZIFPCriA1LCBhbiBBVCZUIDRHIExURSBzbWFydHBob25lCgotLS0tLS0tLSBPcmlnaW5h bCBtZXNzYWdlIC0tLS0tLS0tCkZyb206IEphbiBNZXZpcyA8amFuLm1ldmlzQGluZm9ybWF2aWEu YmU+IApEYXRlOiA4LzE5LzIwMTYgIDI6MTQgQU0gIChHTVQtMDU6MDApIApUbzogeWFrLWxpc3RA bWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbSAKU3ViamVjdDogUmU6IFlhay1MaXN0OiBZYWstNTIgTWF4IEFsdGl0dWRl IAoKSSBjb25maXJtIGhhdmluZyByZWFkIHRoaXMgaW4gc2V2ZXJhbCBvbGQgYm9va3MgKGUuZy50 aGUgYm9vayB3cml0dGVuIGluIEdvdGhpYyBHZXJtYW4gYnkgTG90aGFyIHZvbiBSaWNodGhvZmVu LCB0aGUgYnJvdGhlciBvZiB0aGUgUmVkIEJhcm9uIHdobyB3YXMgYWxzbyBhIHBpbG90KS7CoFRo ZXkgcm91dGluZWx5IGZsZXcgYXQgYWx0aXR1ZGVzIG9mIDQwMDAgdG8gNTAwMCBtZXRlcnMsIGFj Y29yZGluZyB0byB0aGVzZSBib29rcy4KSSBzdGlsbCBmaW5kIHRoaXMgaW5jcmVkaWJsZSB0byBi ZWxpZXZlLkxldOKAmXMgYXNzdW1lIHRoYXQgdGhlIHBpbG90IGluZGVlZCByZWFkIHRoaXMgYWx0 aXR1ZGUgb24gaGlzIGFsdGltZXRlci5XZXJlIHRob3NlIGVhcmx5IGluc3RydW1lbnRzIHRoYXQg cHJlY2lzZSBvciB3ZWxsIGNhbGlicmF0ZWQ/Ckl04oCZcyBub3QgdmVyeSBpbXBvcnRhbnQgdG8g a25vdyBvZiBjb3Vyc2UsIG9ubHkgZm9yIGFjYWRlbWljIHBsZWFzdXJlLgpKYW4sIFlhayA1MCBG LUFaVUsKRnJvbTogIDxvd25lci15YWstbGlzdC1zZXJ2ZXJAbWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbT4gb24gYmVo YWxmIG9mIFJpY2hhcmQgR29vZGUgPHJpY2hhcmQuZ29vZGVAcnVzc2lhbmFlcm9zLmNvbT4KUmVw bHktVG86ICAieWFrLWxpc3RAbWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbSIgPHlhay1saXN0QG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20+ CkRhdGU6ICBGcmlkYXkgMTkgQXVndXN0IDIwMTYgYXQgMDc6NDQKVG86ICAieWFrLWxpc3RAbWF0 cm9uaWNzLmNvbSIgPHlhay1saXN0QG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20+ClN1YmplY3Q6ICBSRTogWWFrLUxp c3Q6IFlhay01MiBNYXggQWx0aXR1ZGUKCjwhLS0KLyogRm9udCBEZWZpbml0aW9ucyAqLwpAZm9u dC1mYWNlCgl7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6SGVsdmV0aWNhOwoJcGFub3NlLTE6MiAxMSA2IDQgMiAyIDIg MiAyIDQ7fQpAZm9udC1mYWNlCgl7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6IkNhbWJyaWEgTWF0aCI7CglwYW5vc2Ut MToyIDQgNSAzIDUgNCA2IDMgMiA0O30KQGZvbnQtZmFjZQoJe2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OkNhbGlicmk7 CglwYW5vc2UtMToyIDE1IDUgMiAyIDIgNCAzIDIgNDt9Ci8qIFN0eWxlIERlZmluaXRpb25zICov CnAuTXNvTm9ybWFsLCBsaS5Nc29Ob3JtYWwsIGRpdi5Nc29Ob3JtYWwKCXttYXJnaW46MGNtOwoJ bWFyZ2luLWJvdHRvbTouMDAwMXB0OwoJZm9udC1zaXplOjEyLjBwdDsKCWZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiJU aW1lcyBOZXcgUm9tYW4iLHNlcmlmO30KYTpsaW5rLCBzcGFuLk1zb0h5cGVybGluawoJe21zby1z dHlsZS1wcmlvcml0eTo5OTsKCWNvbG9yOmJsdWU7Cgl0ZXh0LWRlY29yYXRpb246dW5kZXJsaW5l O30KYTp2aXNpdGVkLCBzcGFuLk1zb0h5cGVybGlua0ZvbGxvd2VkCgl7bXNvLXN0eWxlLXByaW9y aXR5Ojk5OwoJY29sb3I6cHVycGxlOwoJdGV4dC1kZWNvcmF0aW9uOnVuZGVybGluZTt9CnNwYW4u RW1haWxTdHlsZTE3Cgl7bXNvLXN0eWxlLXR5cGU6cGVyc29uYWwtcmVwbHk7Cglmb250LWZhbWls eToiQ2FsaWJyaSIsc2Fucy1zZXJpZjsKCWNvbG9yOiMxRjQ5N0Q7fQouTXNvQ2hwRGVmYXVsdAoJ e21zby1zdHlsZS10eXBlOmV4cG9ydC1vbmx5OwoJZm9udC1zaXplOjEwLjBwdDt9CkBwYWdlIFdv cmRTZWN0aW9uMQoJe3NpemU6NjEyLjBwdCA3OTIuMHB0OwoJbWFyZ2luOjcyLjBwdCA3Mi4wcHQg NzIuMHB0IDcyLjBwdDt9CmRpdi5Xb3JkU2VjdGlvbjEKCXtwYWdlOldvcmRTZWN0aW9uMTt9Ci0t PlRoZXkgZGVmaW5pdGVseSBkaWQhIEkgc3VzcGVjdCBiZWNhdXNlIHRoZSBhaXJjcmFmdCB3ZXJl IHNvIGluY3JlZGlibHkgbGlnaHQuwqBSaWNoYXJkIEdvb2RlwqBGcm9tOiBvd25lci15YWstbGlz dC1zZXJ2ZXJAbWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbSBbbWFpbHRvOm93bmVyLXlhay1saXN0LXNlcnZlckBtYXRy b25pY3MuY29tXSBPbiBCZWhhbGYgT2YgSmFuIE1ldmlzClNlbnQ6IDE5IEF1Z3VzdCAyMDE2IDA2 OjI1ClRvOiB5YWstbGlzdEBtYXRyb25pY3MuY29tClN1YmplY3Q6IFJlOiBZYWstTGlzdDogWWFr LTUyIE1heCBBbHRpdHVkZcKgU28g4oCmIGlmIGl0IHRha2VzIGEgbG9uZyB0aW1lIHRvIGdldCBo aWdoZXIgdGhhbiAxNDUwMCBmZWV0IHdpdGggYSBZYWsgb3IgYSBDSiwgaG93IGRpZCB0aGUgYWNl cyBpbiBXVyBJIGRvIGl0IHdpdGggdGhlaXIgYWxiYXRyb3NzZXMsIHNvcHdpdGhzLCBuaWV1cG9y dHMgYW5kIHRoZSBsaWtlLCDCoHVwIHRvIDIwMDAwIGZlZXQgb3IgNiBraWxvbWV0ZXJzP8KgRnJv bTogPG93bmVyLXlhay1saXN0LXNlcnZlckBtYXRyb25pY3MuY29tPiBvbiBiZWhhbGYgb2YgSm9u IEJsYWtlIDxqYmxha2UyMDdAY29tY2FzdC5uZXQ+ClJlcGx5LVRvOiAieWFrLWxpc3RAbWF0cm9u aWNzLmNvbSIgPHlhay1saXN0QG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20+CkRhdGU6IEZyaWRheSAxOSBBdWd1c3Qg MjAxNiBhdCAwMDowMApUbzogInlhay1saXN0QG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20iIDx5YWstbGlzdEBtYXRy b25pY3MuY29tPgpTdWJqZWN0OiBSZTogWWFrLUxpc3Q6IFlhay01MiBNYXggQWx0aXR1ZGXCoFdl bGwsIEkndmUgaGFkIG15IHN0b2NrLCAyODVIUCBDSiB0byAxNCw1MDEgZmVldCBhbmQgc2hlIHdh cyB3aWxsaW5nIHRvIGdvIGV2ZW4gaGlnaGVyLCBidXQgSSBkaWRuJ3Qgd2FudCB0byBlbWJhcnJh c3MgdGhlIFlBSzUyIEkgd2FzIGZseWluZyB3aW5nIG9uLi4uIEpCIMKgU2VudCBmcm9tIG15IFZl cml6b24gV2lyZWxlc3MgNEcgTFRFIERST0lECgpEYXZlIEplc3RlciA8d2RqZXN0ZXJAY294Lm5l dD4gd3JvdGU6wqBJIGhhdmUgYmVlbiB0byAxNCw1MDAgZmVldCBpbiBteSA1MlREIFRlcm1pa2Fz IGNvbnZlcnNpb24uIMKgU2x1Z2dpc2ggb24gdGhlIGNvbnRyb2xzIHRoYXQgaGlnaC4gwqBPciBt YXliZSBJIHdhcyBzdWZmZXJpbmcgZnJvbSBoeXBveGlhIGFuZCBJIHdhcyB0aGUgb25lIHNsdWdn aXNoISDCoEl0IHdhcyBuZWF0IHdoZW4gYSByZWdpb25hbCBqZXQgcGFzc2VkIG1lIDUwMCBmZWV0 IGJlbG93LiDCoDopwqDCoE9uIEF1ZyAxOCwgMjAxNiwgYXQgMjo0OCBBTSwgTWlrZSBCZXJlc2Zv cmQgPG1pa2VfYmVyZXNmb3JkQHlhaG9vLmNvLnVrPiB3cm90ZToKCkhpIGFsbMKgSSd2ZSBzZWVu IGEgbWF4aW11bSBvcGVyYXRpbmcgYWx0aXR1ZGUgZm9yIHRoZSBZYWstNTIgcXVvdGVkIGFzIDQs MDAwIG0gKDEzLDAwMCBmdCkuIE9idmlvdXNseSB0aGlzIHJlcXVpcmVzIHBpbG90IG94eWdlbiwg YnV0IGlzIHRoZSBhbHRpdHVkZSBsaW1pdGF0aW9uIGR1ZSB0byBvcGVyYXRpb25hbCBwcm9jZWR1 cmVzLCBvciBhIHRlY2huaWNhbCBsaW1pdGF0aW9uIG9uIHRoZSBhaXJjcmFmdD/CoFNvbWVvbmUg c3VnZ2VzdGVkIHRvIG1lIHRoYXQgdGhlIGZ1ZWwgbWl4dHVyZSBjb21wZW5zYXRpb24gbWF5IHJ1 biBvdXQgb2YgdHJhdmVsIGFib3ZlIHRoZSBhbHRpdHVkZSBsaW1pdC4gQW55b25lIGhhdmUgc29t ZSBpbnNpZ2h0IGludG8gdGhlIGJlaGF2aW91ciBvZiB0aGUgZW5naW5lIGFib3ZlIDEzLDAwMCBm dD/CoEJsdWUgc2tpZXNNaWtlwqAKLS0gClRoaXMgbWVzc2FnZSBoYXMgYmVlbiBzY2FubmVkIGZv ciB2aXJ1c2VzIGFuZCAKZGFuZ2Vyb3VzIGNvbnRlbnQgYnkgTWFpbFNjYW5uZXIsIGFuZCBpcyAK YmVsaWV2ZWQgdG8gYmUgY2xlYW4uIAo


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:42:14 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Yak-52 Max Altitude
    From: cjpilot710 <cjpilot710@aol.com>
    CiAgICAKUGx1cyBJIHNlZW0gdG8gcmVtZW1iZXIgcmVhZGluZyBpbiBhIENoaW5lc2UgbWFudWFs IG9yIEplYW4ncyB0aGUgQ0o2QSB3YXMgY2FwYWJsZSBvZiAxNywwMDAgZmVldC4KCgpTZW50IHZp YSB0aGUgU2Ftc3VuZyBHQUxBWFkgU8KuIDUsIGFuIEFUJlQgNEcgTFRFIHNtYXJ0cGhvbmUKCi0t LS0tLS0tIE9yaWdpbmFsIG1lc3NhZ2UgLS0tLS0tLS0KRnJvbTogSmFuIE1ldmlzIDxqYW4ubWV2 aXNAaW5mb3JtYXZpYS5iZT4gCkRhdGU6IDgvMTkvMjAxNiAgMjoxNCBBTSAgKEdNVC0wNTowMCkg ClRvOiB5YWstbGlzdEBtYXRyb25pY3MuY29tIApTdWJqZWN0OiBSZTogWWFrLUxpc3Q6IFlhay01 MiBNYXggQWx0aXR1ZGUgCgpJIGNvbmZpcm0gaGF2aW5nIHJlYWQgdGhpcyBpbiBzZXZlcmFsIG9s ZCBib29rcyAoZS5nLnRoZSBib29rIHdyaXR0ZW4gaW4gR290aGljIEdlcm1hbiBieSBMb3RoYXIg dm9uIFJpY2h0aG9mZW4sIHRoZSBicm90aGVyIG9mIHRoZSBSZWQgQmFyb24gd2hvIHdhcyBhbHNv IGEgcGlsb3QpLsKgVGhleSByb3V0aW5lbHkgZmxldyBhdCBhbHRpdHVkZXMgb2YgNDAwMCB0byA1 MDAwIG1ldGVycywgYWNjb3JkaW5nIHRvIHRoZXNlIGJvb2tzLgpJIHN0aWxsIGZpbmQgdGhpcyBp bmNyZWRpYmxlIHRvIGJlbGlldmUuTGV04oCZcyBhc3N1bWUgdGhhdCB0aGUgcGlsb3QgaW5kZWVk IHJlYWQgdGhpcyBhbHRpdHVkZSBvbiBoaXMgYWx0aW1ldGVyLldlcmUgdGhvc2UgZWFybHkgaW5z dHJ1bWVudHMgdGhhdCBwcmVjaXNlIG9yIHdlbGwgY2FsaWJyYXRlZD8KSXTigJlzIG5vdCB2ZXJ5 IGltcG9ydGFudCB0byBrbm93IG9mIGNvdXJzZSwgb25seSBmb3IgYWNhZGVtaWMgcGxlYXN1cmUu CkphbiwgWWFrIDUwIEYtQVpVSwpGcm9tOiAgPG93bmVyLXlhay1saXN0LXNlcnZlckBtYXRyb25p Y3MuY29tPiBvbiBiZWhhbGYgb2YgUmljaGFyZCBHb29kZSA8cmljaGFyZC5nb29kZUBydXNzaWFu YWVyb3MuY29tPgpSZXBseS1UbzogICJ5YWstbGlzdEBtYXRyb25pY3MuY29tIiA8eWFrLWxpc3RA bWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbT4KRGF0ZTogIEZyaWRheSAxOSBBdWd1c3QgMjAxNiBhdCAwNzo0NApUbzog ICJ5YWstbGlzdEBtYXRyb25pY3MuY29tIiA8eWFrLWxpc3RAbWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbT4KU3ViamVj dDogIFJFOiBZYWstTGlzdDogWWFrLTUyIE1heCBBbHRpdHVkZQoKPCEtLQovKiBGb250IERlZmlu aXRpb25zICovCkBmb250LWZhY2UKCXtmb250LWZhbWlseTpIZWx2ZXRpY2E7CglwYW5vc2UtMToy IDExIDYgNCAyIDIgMiAyIDIgNDt9CkBmb250LWZhY2UKCXtmb250LWZhbWlseToiQ2FtYnJpYSBN YXRoIjsKCXBhbm9zZS0xOjIgNCA1IDMgNSA0IDYgMyAyIDQ7fQpAZm9udC1mYWNlCgl7Zm9udC1m YW1pbHk6Q2FsaWJyaTsKCXBhbm9zZS0xOjIgMTUgNSAyIDIgMiA0IDMgMiA0O30KLyogU3R5bGUg RGVmaW5pdGlvbnMgKi8KcC5Nc29Ob3JtYWwsIGxpLk1zb05vcm1hbCwgZGl2Lk1zb05vcm1hbAoJ e21hcmdpbjowY207CgltYXJnaW4tYm90dG9tOi4wMDAxcHQ7Cglmb250LXNpemU6MTIuMHB0OwoJ Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6IlRpbWVzIE5ldyBSb21hbiIsc2VyaWY7fQphOmxpbmssIHNwYW4uTXNvSHlw ZXJsaW5rCgl7bXNvLXN0eWxlLXByaW9yaXR5Ojk5OwoJY29sb3I6Ymx1ZTsKCXRleHQtZGVjb3Jh dGlvbjp1bmRlcmxpbmU7fQphOnZpc2l0ZWQsIHNwYW4uTXNvSHlwZXJsaW5rRm9sbG93ZWQKCXtt c28tc3R5bGUtcHJpb3JpdHk6OTk7Cgljb2xvcjpwdXJwbGU7Cgl0ZXh0LWRlY29yYXRpb246dW5k ZXJsaW5lO30Kc3Bhbi5FbWFpbFN0eWxlMTcKCXttc28tc3R5bGUtdHlwZTpwZXJzb25hbC1yZXBs eTsKCWZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiJDYWxpYnJpIixzYW5zLXNlcmlmOwoJY29sb3I6IzFGNDk3RDt9Ci5N c29DaHBEZWZhdWx0Cgl7bXNvLXN0eWxlLXR5cGU6ZXhwb3J0LW9ubHk7Cglmb250LXNpemU6MTAu MHB0O30KQHBhZ2UgV29yZFNlY3Rpb24xCgl7c2l6ZTo2MTIuMHB0IDc5Mi4wcHQ7CgltYXJnaW46 NzIuMHB0IDcyLjBwdCA3Mi4wcHQgNzIuMHB0O30KZGl2LldvcmRTZWN0aW9uMQoJe3BhZ2U6V29y ZFNlY3Rpb24xO30KLS0+VGhleSBkZWZpbml0ZWx5IGRpZCEgSSBzdXNwZWN0IGJlY2F1c2UgdGhl IGFpcmNyYWZ0IHdlcmUgc28gaW5jcmVkaWJseSBsaWdodC7CoFJpY2hhcmQgR29vZGXCoEZyb206 IG93bmVyLXlhay1saXN0LXNlcnZlckBtYXRyb25pY3MuY29tIFttYWlsdG86b3duZXIteWFrLWxp c3Qtc2VydmVyQG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb21dIE9uIEJlaGFsZiBPZiBKYW4gTWV2aXMKU2VudDogMTkg QXVndXN0IDIwMTYgMDY6MjUKVG86IHlhay1saXN0QG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20KU3ViamVjdDogUmU6 IFlhay1MaXN0OiBZYWstNTIgTWF4IEFsdGl0dWRlwqBTbyDigKYgaWYgaXQgdGFrZXMgYSBsb25n IHRpbWUgdG8gZ2V0IGhpZ2hlciB0aGFuIDE0NTAwIGZlZXQgd2l0aCBhIFlhayBvciBhIENKLCBo b3cgZGlkIHRoZSBhY2VzIGluIFdXIEkgZG8gaXQgd2l0aCB0aGVpciBhbGJhdHJvc3Nlcywgc29w d2l0aHMsIG5pZXVwb3J0cyBhbmQgdGhlIGxpa2UsIMKgdXAgdG8gMjAwMDAgZmVldCBvciA2IGtp bG9tZXRlcnM/wqBGcm9tOiA8b3duZXIteWFrLWxpc3Qtc2VydmVyQG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20+IG9u IGJlaGFsZiBvZiBKb24gQmxha2UgPGpibGFrZTIwN0Bjb21jYXN0Lm5ldD4KUmVwbHktVG86ICJ5 YWstbGlzdEBtYXRyb25pY3MuY29tIiA8eWFrLWxpc3RAbWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbT4KRGF0ZTogRnJp ZGF5IDE5IEF1Z3VzdCAyMDE2IGF0IDAwOjAwClRvOiAieWFrLWxpc3RAbWF0cm9uaWNzLmNvbSIg PHlhay1saXN0QG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20+ClN1YmplY3Q6IFJlOiBZYWstTGlzdDogWWFrLTUyIE1h eCBBbHRpdHVkZcKgV2VsbCwgSSd2ZSBoYWQgbXkgc3RvY2ssIDI4NUhQIENKIHRvIDE0LDUwMSBm ZWV0IGFuZCBzaGUgd2FzIHdpbGxpbmcgdG8gZ28gZXZlbiBoaWdoZXIsIGJ1dCBJIGRpZG4ndCB3 YW50IHRvIGVtYmFycmFzcyB0aGUgWUFLNTIgSSB3YXMgZmx5aW5nIHdpbmcgb24uLi4gSkIgwqBT ZW50IGZyb20gbXkgVmVyaXpvbiBXaXJlbGVzcyA0RyBMVEUgRFJPSUQKCkRhdmUgSmVzdGVyIDx3 ZGplc3RlckBjb3gubmV0PiB3cm90ZTrCoEkgaGF2ZSBiZWVuIHRvIDE0LDUwMCBmZWV0IGluIG15 IDUyVEQgVGVybWlrYXMgY29udmVyc2lvbi4gwqBTbHVnZ2lzaCBvbiB0aGUgY29udHJvbHMgdGhh dCBoaWdoLiDCoE9yIG1heWJlIEkgd2FzIHN1ZmZlcmluZyBmcm9tIGh5cG94aWEgYW5kIEkgd2Fz IHRoZSBvbmUgc2x1Z2dpc2ghIMKgSXQgd2FzIG5lYXQgd2hlbiBhIHJlZ2lvbmFsIGpldCBwYXNz ZWQgbWUgNTAwIGZlZXQgYmVsb3cuIMKgOinCoMKgT24gQXVnIDE4LCAyMDE2LCBhdCAyOjQ4IEFN LCBNaWtlIEJlcmVzZm9yZCA8bWlrZV9iZXJlc2ZvcmRAeWFob28uY28udWs+IHdyb3RlOgoKSGkg YWxswqBJJ3ZlIHNlZW4gYSBtYXhpbXVtIG9wZXJhdGluZyBhbHRpdHVkZSBmb3IgdGhlIFlhay01 MiBxdW90ZWQgYXMgNCwwMDAgbSAoMTMsMDAwIGZ0KS4gT2J2aW91c2x5IHRoaXMgcmVxdWlyZXMg cGlsb3Qgb3h5Z2VuLCBidXQgaXMgdGhlIGFsdGl0dWRlIGxpbWl0YXRpb24gZHVlIHRvIG9wZXJh dGlvbmFsIHByb2NlZHVyZXMsIG9yIGEgdGVjaG5pY2FsIGxpbWl0YXRpb24gb24gdGhlIGFpcmNy YWZ0P8KgU29tZW9uZSBzdWdnZXN0ZWQgdG8gbWUgdGhhdCB0aGUgZnVlbCBtaXh0dXJlIGNvbXBl bnNhdGlvbiBtYXkgcnVuIG91dCBvZiB0cmF2ZWwgYWJvdmUgdGhlIGFsdGl0dWRlIGxpbWl0LiBB bnlvbmUgaGF2ZSBzb21lIGluc2lnaHQgaW50byB0aGUgYmVoYXZpb3VyIG9mIHRoZSBlbmdpbmUg YWJvdmUgMTMsMDAwIGZ0P8KgQmx1ZSBza2llc01pa2XCoAotLSAKVGhpcyBtZXNzYWdlIGhhcyBi ZWVuIHNjYW5uZWQgZm9yIHZpcnVzZXMgYW5kIApkYW5nZXJvdXMgY29udGVudCBieSBNYWlsU2Nh bm5lciwgYW5kIGlzIApiZWxpZXZlZCB0byBiZSBjbGVhbi4gCg=


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:57:01 AM PST US
    Subject: Flour Bombing
    From: cjpilot710 <cjpilot710@aol.com>
    CiAgICAKSWYgd2UgdGVsbCB5b3UgaG93IHRvIGRvIGl0IHRoZW4geW91IGJlY29tZSBjb21wZXRp dGlvbiEKSG93ZXZlciBiZWluZyBhIGdvb2Qgc3BvcnQgd2hhdCB5b3Ugd2FudCB0byBkbyBpcyBs aW5lIHRoZSBhaXJwbGFuZSB1cCAoeW91ciBDZW50ZXIgTGluZSB3aXRoIHRoZSB0YXJnZXQpIHdo ZW4geW91IGNhbiBzZWUgaXQsIHBpY2stdXAgYSBwb2ludCBvdXQgb24gb25lIHNpZGUgb2YgdGhl IGFpcnBsYW5lIGV2ZW4gd2l0aCB0aGUgdGFyZ2V0IGZhciBlbm91Z2ggb3V0IHNvIHRoYXQgeW91 IGNhbiBzZWUgaXQgd2hlbiB5b3UgZ28gZGlyZWN0bHkgb3ZlciB0aGUgdGFyZ2V0IC4gwqAgVG9z cyB0aGUgYmFnIG9mIGZsb3VyIG91dCB0aGUgYmFjayBvciBvdXQgdGhlIGZyb250LiDCoCBEbyBz byBhcyB0aGUgcmVmZXJlbmNlIHBvaW50IHlvdSBwaWNrZWQgZXZlbiB3aXRoIHRoZSB0YXJnZXQs IGlzIGFib3V0IGEgZm9vdCBpbiBmcm9udCBvZiB0aGUgTGVhZGluZyBFZGdlIG9mIHRoZSB3aW5n LiDCoFRoaXMgaXMgZ29vZCBmb3IgYSAyMDAtZm9vdCBhbHRpdHVkZSBhdCBjcnVpc2Ugc3BlZWQu IMKgCgoKU2VudCB2aWEgdGhlIFNhbXN1bmcgR0FMQVhZIFPCriA1LCBhbiBBVCZUIDRHIExURSBz bWFydHBob25lCgotLS0tLS0tLSBPcmlnaW5hbCBtZXNzYWdlIC0tLS0tLS0tCkZyb206IFBoaWxp cCBOaWNob2xzb24gPHBlZG5pY2hvbHNvbkBnbWFpbC5jb20+IApEYXRlOiA4LzE5LzIwMTYgIDk6 MzYgQU0gIChHTVQtMDU6MDApIApUbzogWWFrLUxpc3QgPFlhay1MaXN0QG1hdHJvbmljcy5jb20+ IApTdWJqZWN0OiBZYWstTGlzdDogRmxvdXIgQm9tYmluZyAKCgoKSGkgZ3V5cywKClRoZXJl4oCZ cyBhIGZsb3VyIGJvbWJpbmcgY29tcGV0aXRpb24gYXQgdGhlIGxvY2FsIHN0cmlwIG5leHQKd2Vl a2VuZC4KCkRvZXMgYW55b25lIGhhdmUgYW55IGNsZXZlciBpZGVhcyBvbiByZWxlYXNpbmcgdGhl IGJhZyBvZgpmbG91cj8gU3VyZWx5IHRoZXJl4oCZcyBhIGJldHRlciB3YXkgdGhhbiBzaW1wbHkg aGVhdmluZyBpdCBvdmVyIHRoZSBzaWRlIG9udG8KdGhlIHdpbmcgYW5kIGhhdmluZyBpdCBzbGlk ZSBvZi4gU2Vjb25kbHksIGRvZXMgYW55b25lIGhhdmUgYW55IHRhY3RpY3MgdGhleQp3aXNoIHRv IHNoYXJlPyBpLmUuLCBob3cgbWFueSBmZWV0IGluIGZyb250IG9mIHRoZSB0YXJnZXQgdG8gcmVs ZWFzZeKApiB3aGV0aGVyCnRvIOKAmHRvc3PigJkgaXQgb3IgYXBwcm9hY2ggbGV2ZWwgZXRjPyBB bnkgZm9ybXVsYXM/IEoKCk5ldmVyIGRvbmUgaXQgYmVmb3JlIHNvIGFueSBpbnB1dCB3ZWxjb21l LgoKwqAKClBoaWwgTi4KCk5hbmNoYW5nIOKAkyBDSjZBCgpDLUZFUE4gLSBPdHRhd2EKCgo


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:31:02 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Yak-52 Max Altitude
    From: Roger Kemp <f16viperdoc@me.com>
    FL 180 was listed somewhere for the YAK 52. Scotty "Sky King" Patterson got h is YAK up to FL 200. He filed IFR to do it. Pretty much caught the low jet f rom Selma to MGM in 5 min. Good thing since he used most of his fuel to get u p there. Doc Sent from my iPad > On Aug 19, 2016, at 1:41 PM, cjpilot710 <cjpilot710@aol.com> wrote: > > Plus I seem to remember reading in a Chinese manual or Jean's the CJ6A was capable of 17,000 feet. > > > > Sent via the Samsung GALAXY S=C2=AE 5, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone > > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Jan Mevis <jan.mevis@informavia.be> > Date: 8/19/2016 2:14 AM (GMT-05:00) > To: yak-list@matronics.com > Subject: Re: Yak-List: Yak-52 Max Altitude > > I confirm having read this in several old books (e.g.the book written in G othic German by Lothar von Richthofen, the brother of the Red Baron who was a lso a pilot). > They routinely flew at altitudes of 4000 to 5000 meters, according to thes e books. > > I still find this incredible to believe. > Let=99s assume that the pilot indeed read this altitude on his altim eter. > Were those early instruments that precise or well calibrated? > > It=99s not very important to know of course, only for academic pleas ure. > > Jan, Yak 50 F-AZUK > > From: <owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com> on behalf of Richard Goode <ri chard.goode@russianaeros.com> > Date: Friday 19 August 2016 at 07:44 > To: "yak-list@matronics.com" <yak-list@matronics.com> > Subject: RE: Yak-List: Yak-52 Max Altitude > > They definitely did! I suspect because the aircraft were so incredibly lig ht. > > Richard Goode > > From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@ma tronics.com] On Behalf Of Jan Mevis > Sent: 19 August 2016 06:25 > To: yak-list@matronics.com > Subject: Re: Yak-List: Yak-52 Max Altitude > > So if it takes a long time to get higher than 14500 feet with a Y ak or a CJ, how did the aces in WW I do it with their albatrosses, sopwiths, nieuports and the like, up to 20000 feet or 6 kilometers? > > From: <owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com> on behalf of Jon Blake <jblake 207@comcast.net> > Date: Friday 19 August 2016 at 00:00 > To: "yak-list@matronics.com" <yak-list@matronics.com> > Subject: Re: Yak-List: Yak-52 Max Altitude > > Well, I've had my stock, 285HP CJ to 14,501 feet and she was willing to go even higher, but I didn't want to embarrass the YAK52 I was flying wing on. .. JB > > Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID > > > Dave Jester <wdjester@cox.net> wrote: > > I have been to 14,500 feet in my 52TD Termikas conversion. Sluggish on t he controls that high. Or maybe I was suffering from hypoxia and I was the o ne sluggish! It was neat when a regional jet passed me 500 feet below. :) > > > On Aug 18, 2016, at 2:48 AM, Mike Beresford <mike_beresford@yahoo.co.uk> w rote: > > > Hi all > > I've seen a maximum operating altitude for the Yak-52 quoted as 4,000 m (1 3,000 ft). Obviously this requires pilot oxygen, but is the altitude limitat ion due to operational procedures, or a technical limitation on the aircraft ? > > Someone suggested to me that the fuel mixture compensation may run out of t ravel above the altitude limit. Anyone have some insight into the behaviour o f the engine above 13,000 ft? > > Blue skies > Mike > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean.


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:33:00 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Yak-52 Max Altitude
    From: Roger Kemp <f16viperdoc@me.com>
    Sent from my iPad > On Aug 19, 2016, at 10:45 AM, Bitterlich, Mark G CIV NAVAIR, WD <mark.bitterlich@navy.mil> wrote: > > > I've had my YAK-50 up to 17,500 (on oxygen by the way), just to see if I could do it. It wasn't climbing very fast, but still had way more to go. I stopped because I was too darn cold, and I was not IFR equipped. > > Of course I've never found a CJ that could keep up with me in any regard, so there is that. :-) Except for the cockpit heater of course. > > Mark > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jon Blake > Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 6:01 PM > To: yak-list@matronics.com > Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Yak-List: Yak-52 Max Altitude > > Well, I've had my stock, 285HP CJ to 14,501 feet and she was willing to go even higher, but I didn't want to embarrass the YAK52 I was flying wing on... JB > > Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID > > > Dave Jester <wdjester@cox.net> wrote: > > > I have been to 14,500 feet in my 52TD Termikas conversion. Sluggish on the controls that high. Or maybe I was suffering from hypoxia and I was the one sluggish! It was neat when a regional jet passed me 500 feet below. :) > > > On Aug 18, 2016, at 2:48 AM, Mike Beresford <mike_beresford@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > > > Hi all > > I've seen a maximum operating altitude for the Yak-52 quoted as 4,000 m (13,000 ft). Obviously this requires pilot oxygen, but is the altitude limitation due to operational procedures, or a technical limitation on the aircraft? > > Someone suggested to me that the fuel mixture compensation may run out of travel above the altitude limit. Anyone have some insight into the behaviour of the engine above 13,000 ft? > > Blue skies > Mike > > > > > > >


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:54:24 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Yak-52 Max Altitude
    From: Roger Kemp <f16viperdoc@me.com>
    The Brits had a Dolphin that routinely operated at FL 200. The Focker DVII w as good for FL180 so the SEA 5's and Dolphins would lurk above cloud decks w aiting for the Fockers to appear over the FEBA. The SPAD VII-XIII and the Ni euport 28 C1 were capable of FL180-200 on very cold days also but that was n ear their max. The Germans had a two seat observation aircraft, Rumpler, the flew at FL 200 and occasionally on really cold days FL210. All of the WW I drivers had balls. Short lives too. It was the Germans that d eveloped the parachute for fighters near the end of the War. Doc Sent from my iPad > On Aug 19, 2016, at 1:14 AM, Jan Mevis <jan.mevis@informavia.be> wrote: > > I confirm having read this in several old books (e.g.the book written in G othic German by Lothar von Richthofen, the brother of the Red Baron who was a lso a pilot). > They routinely flew at altitudes of 4000 to 5000 meters, according to thes e books. > > I still find this incredible to believe. > Let=99s assume that the pilot indeed read this altitude on his altim eter. > Were those early instruments that precise or well calibrated? > > It=99s not very important to know of course, only for academic pleas ure. > > Jan, Yak 50 F-AZUK > > From: <owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com> on behalf of Richard Goode <ri chard.goode@russianaeros.com> > Date: Friday 19 August 2016 at 07:44 > To: "yak-list@matronics.com" <yak-list@matronics.com> > Subject: RE: Yak-List: Yak-52 Max Altitude > > They definitely did! I suspect because the aircraft were so incredibly lig ht. > > Richard Goode > > From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@ma tronics.com] On Behalf Of Jan Mevis > Sent: 19 August 2016 06:25 > To: yak-list@matronics.com > Subject: Re: Yak-List: Yak-52 Max Altitude > > So if it takes a long time to get higher than 14500 feet with a Y ak or a CJ, how did the aces in WW I do it with their albatrosses, sopwiths, nieuports and the like, up to 20000 feet or 6 kilometers? > > From: <owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com> on behalf of Jon Blake <jblake 207@comcast.net> > Date: Friday 19 August 2016 at 00:00 > To: "yak-list@matronics.com" <yak-list@matronics.com> > Subject: Re: Yak-List: Yak-52 Max Altitude > > Well, I've had my stock, 285HP CJ to 14,501 feet and she was willing to go even higher, but I didn't want to embarrass the YAK52 I was flying wing on. .. JB > > Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID > > > Dave Jester <wdjester@cox.net> wrote: > > I have been to 14,500 feet in my 52TD Termikas conversion. Sluggish on t he controls that high. Or maybe I was suffering from hypoxia and I was the o ne sluggish! It was neat when a regional jet passed me 500 feet below. :) > > > On Aug 18, 2016, at 2:48 AM, Mike Beresford <mike_beresford@yahoo.co.uk> w rote: > > > Hi all > > I've seen a maximum operating altitude for the Yak-52 quoted as 4,000 m (1 3,000 ft). Obviously this requires pilot oxygen, but is the altitude limitat ion due to operational procedures, or a technical limitation on the aircraft ? > > Someone suggested to me that the fuel mixture compensation may run out of t ravel above the altitude limit. Anyone have some insight into the behaviour o f the engine above 13,000 ft? > > Blue skies > Mike > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean.


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:16:53 PM PST US
    From: "Bitterlich, Mark G CIV NAVAIR, WD" <mark.bitterlich@navy.mil>
    Subject: Flour Bombing
    My first flour bombing contest was in a T-34B. Beach N4756 out of Cherry Point Aero Club. Had a good friend and pilot in the back. We came zorching in out of a dive and missed the target by a rather embarrassing amount. Next sack was just as bad. So the decision was, if you can't be good at the bombing, at least look good in the air. On the next pass I came in and went to the runway... mere feet about the concrete. The rules gave a minimum RELEASE altitude, but didn't really specify a hard deck. So, in we came. Somewhat short of the bulls-eye ring, I pulled way too much G for that old beast and up into the vertical we went. Right before the kick for the hammerhead my friend in back threw the bag straight out the top of the canopy. The hammerhead was pretty close to zero airspeed. No arc, and lots of airframe shaking is the give-away. As I reached the vertical downline, I swore I could see that bag heading down in front of me, but it was probably my imagination. After landing, we were banned from further flour bombing. Seems people were running for cover and the bag hit a nearby hangar roof, and the owner was none too pleased. That said, most folks said it was the most awesome flour bombing attempt they had ever seen. Missed by a mile, but got points for style. Of course this was 40 years ago. :-) Mark ________________________________ From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] on behalf of cjpilot710 [cjpilot710@aol.com] Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 2:56 PM Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: Yak-List: Flour Bombing If we tell you how to do it then you become competition! However being a good sport what you want to do is line the airplane up (your Center Line with the target) when you can see it, pick-up a point out on one side of the airplane even with the target far enough out so that you can see it when you go directly over the target . Toss the bag of flour out the back or out the front. Do so as the reference point you picked even with the target, is about a foot in front of the Leading Edge of the wing. This is good for a 200-foot altitude at cruise speed. Sent via the Samsung GALAXY S 5, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: Philip Nicholson <pednicholson@gmail.com> Subject: Yak-List: Flour Bombing Hi guys, Theres a flour bombing competition at the local strip next weekend. Does anyone have any clever ideas on releasing the bag of flour? Surely theres a better way than simply heaving it over the side onto the wing and having it slide of. Secondly, does anyone have any tactics they wish to share? i.e., how many feet in front of the target to release whether to toss it or approach level etc? Any formulas? :) Never done it before so any input welcome. Phil N. Nanchang CJ6A C-FEPN - Ottawa


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:21:36 PM PST US
    From: Bill Lang <billlang@live.com.au>
    Subject: Re: Flour Bombing
    The Australian contingent of Yak/Chang operators, Red Radials Air Brigade ( light expeditionary) or RRABLE, has been doing flour bombing as part of our 6 monthly fly away competitions for several years now. Fully risk assessed , with SOP for that and other exercises including streamer cutting, we have CASA approval (ozFAA). If you don't want to reinvent the wheel, contact me off list and I can email all you need. Bill Sent from my iPad On 20 Aug 2016, at 01:52, Jon Blake <jblake207@comcast.net<mailto:jblake207 @comcast.net>> wrote: Phil, constants are the key... level altitude and constant ground speed. Ha ving someone on the ground giving you a battle damage assessment is vital. Pick a speed (110) and altitude (200) and as the target disappears under th e leading edge wing if releasing from back seat or the nose if from front s eat toss down and aft... then adjust azimuth and release point based on BDA report from the ground guy. Another technique is to dive towards a point just beyond the target...maybe 20-30 feet and try to maintain a constant sp eed in the dive and release at 250 feet or just as you're pulling out. CAUT ION... TARGET FIXATION IS A REAL DANGER AND YOU'LL BUST THE HARD DECK OR YO UR ASS. This dive bomb technique is less accurate and higher risk in my opi nion. And finally the best technique for a winning score is to bribe the ju dge... Good luck. Saber Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID Philip Nicholson <pednicholson@gmail.com<mailto:pednicholson@gmail.com>> wr ote: Hi guys, There's a flour bombing competition at the local strip next weekend. Does anyone have any clever ideas on releasing the bag of flour? Surely the re's a better way than simply heaving it over the side onto the wing and ha ving it slide of. Secondly, does anyone have any tactics they wish to share ? i.e., how many feet in front of the target to release... whether to 'toss ' it or approach level etc? Any formulas? :) Never done it before so any input welcome. Phil N. Nanchang - CJ6A C-FEPN - Ottawa


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:52:54 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Flour Bombing
    From: William Halverson <william@netpros.net>
    Well what did you expect? Zoomies have no sense of humor ... "NAVAIR" says it all. Fly NAVY, let the zoomies clean up the mess ... On 8/19/2016 6:16 PM, Bitterlich, Mark G CIV NAVAIR, WD wrote: > > My first flour bombing contest was in a T-34B. Beach N4756 out of Cherry Point Aero Club. Had a good friend and pilot in the back. We came zorching in out of a dive and missed the target by a rather embarrassing amount. Next sack was just as bad. So the decision was, if you can't be good at the bombing, at least look good in the air. > > > On the next pass I came in and went to the runway... mere feet about the concrete. The rules gave a minimum RELEASE altitude, but didn't really specify a hard deck. So, in we came. > > > Somewhat short of the bulls-eye ring, I pulled way too much G for that old beast and up into the vertical we went. Right before the kick for the hammerhead my friend in back threw the bag straight out the top of the canopy. The hammerhead was pretty close to zero airspeed. No arc, and lots of airframe shaking is the give-away. As I reached the vertical downline, I swore I could see that bag heading down in front of me, but it was probably my imagination. > > > After landing, we were banned from further flour bombing. Seems people were running for cover and the bag hit a nearby hangar roof, and the owner was none too pleased. > > > That said, most folks said it was the most awesome flour bombing attempt they had ever seen. Missed by a mile, but got points for style. > > > Of course this was 40 years ago. :-) > > > Mark > > > ________________________________ > From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] on behalf of cjpilot710 [cjpilot710@aol.com] > Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 2:56 PM > To: yak-list@matronics.com > Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: Yak-List: Flour Bombing > > If we tell you how to do it then you become competition! > > However being a good sport what you want to do is line the airplane up (your Center Line with the target) when you can see it, pick-up a point out on one side of the airplane even with the target far enough out so that you can see it when you go directly over the target . Toss the bag of flour out the back or out the front. Do so as the reference point you picked even with the target, is about a foot in front of the Leading Edge of the wing. This is good for a 200-foot altitude at cruise speed. > > > Sent via the Samsung GALAXY S 5, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone > > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Philip Nicholson <pednicholson@gmail.com> > Date: 8/19/2016 9:36 AM (GMT-05:00) > To: Yak-List <Yak-List@matronics.com> > Subject: Yak-List: Flour Bombing > > > Hi guys, > > Theres a flour bombing competition at the local strip next weekend. > > Does anyone have any clever ideas on releasing the bag of flour? Surely theres a better way than simply heaving it over the side onto the wing and having it slide of. Secondly, does anyone have any tactics they wish to share? i.e., how many feet in front of the target to release whether to toss it or approach level etc? Any formulas? :) > > Never done it before so any input welcome. > > > Phil N. > > Nanchang CJ6A > > C-FEPN - Ottawa > >


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:32:21 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Flour Bombing
    From: Roger Kemp <f16viperdoc@me.com>
    Now that purity funny there, I don't care who you are! Doc Sent from my iPad > On Aug 19, 2016, at 5:16 PM, Bitterlich, Mark G CIV NAVAIR, WD <mark.bitterlich@navy.mil> wrote: > > > My first flour bombing contest was in a T-34B. Beach N4756 out of Cherry Point Aero Club. Had a good friend and pilot in the back. We came zorching in out of a dive and missed the target by a rather embarrassing amount. Next sack was just as bad. So the decision was, if you can't be good at the bombing, at least look good in the air. > > > > On the next pass I came in and went to the runway... mere feet about the concrete. The rules gave a minimum RELEASE altitude, but didn't really specify a hard deck. So, in we came. > > > > Somewhat short of the bulls-eye ring, I pulled way too much G for that old beast and up into the vertical we went. Right before the kick for the hammerhead my friend in back threw the bag straight out the top of the canopy. The hammerhead was pretty close to zero airspeed. No arc, and lots of airframe shaking is the give-away. As I reached the vertical downline, I swore I could see that bag heading down in front of me, but it was probably my imagination. > > > > After landing, we were banned from further flour bombing. Seems people were running for cover and the bag hit a nearby hangar roof, and the owner was none too pleased. > > > > That said, most folks said it was the most awesome flour bombing attempt they had ever seen. Missed by a mile, but got points for style. > > > > Of course this was 40 years ago. :-) > > > > Mark > > > > > > ________________________________ > From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] on behalf of cjpilot710 [cjpilot710@aol.com] > Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 2:56 PM > To: yak-list@matronics.com > Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: Yak-List: Flour Bombing > > If we tell you how to do it then you become competition! > > However being a good sport what you want to do is line the airplane up (your Center Line with the target) when you can see it, pick-up a point out on one side of the airplane even with the target far enough out so that you can see it when you go directly over the target . Toss the bag of flour out the back or out the front. Do so as the reference point you picked even with the target, is about a foot in front of the Leading Edge of the wing. This is good for a 200-foot altitude at cruise speed. > > > > Sent via the Samsung GALAXY S 5, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone > > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Philip Nicholson <pednicholson@gmail.com> > Date: 8/19/2016 9:36 AM (GMT-05:00) > To: Yak-List <Yak-List@matronics.com> > Subject: Yak-List: Flour Bombing > > > Hi guys, > > Theres a flour bombing competition at the local strip next weekend. > > Does anyone have any clever ideas on releasing the bag of flour? Surely theres a better way than simply heaving it over the side onto the wing and having it slide of. Secondly, does anyone have any tactics they wish to share? i.e., how many feet in front of the target to release whether to toss it or approach level etc? Any formulas? :) > > Never done it before so any input welcome. > > > > Phil N. > > Nanchang CJ6A > > C-FEPN - Ottawa > > > > >


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:39:30 PM PST US
    From: Rico Jaeger <rocknpilot@hotmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Flour Bombing
    Mark, Just read your hilarious account of flour bombing to my family! They giggled, but I was in tears! GOOD STUFF, SIR!! Made my night! And on a serious note, hats off to you for the humble disclosure! Nice to see even the "big dogs" can laugh at themselves. Life is too short to never settle for less than awesome. Still smiling... Rico Sent from my iPad > On Aug 19, 2016, at 5:57 PM, William Halverson <william@netpros.net> wrote: > > > Well what did you expect? > > Zoomies have no sense of humor ... > > "NAVAIR" says it all. > > Fly NAVY, let the zoomies clean up the mess ... > > > >> On 8/19/2016 6:16 PM, Bitterlich, Mark G CIV NAVAIR, WD wrote: >> >> My first flour bombing contest was in a T-34B. Beach N4756 out of Cherry Point Aero Club. Had a good friend and pilot in the back. We came zorching in out of a dive and missed the target by a rather embarrassing amount. Next sack was just as bad. So the decision was, if you can't be good at the bombing, at least look good in the air. >> >> >> >> On the next pass I came in and went to the runway... mere feet about the concrete. The rules gave a minimum RELEASE altitude, but didn't really specify a hard deck. So, in we came. >> >> >> >> Somewhat short of the bulls-eye ring, I pulled way too much G for that old beast and up into the vertical we went. Right before the kick for the hammerhead my friend in back threw the bag straight out the top of the canopy. The hammerhead was pretty close to zero airspeed. No arc, and lots of airframe shaking is the give-away. As I reached the vertical downline, I swore I could see that bag heading down in front of me, but it was probably my imagination. >> >> >> >> After landing, we were banned from further flour bombing. Seems people were running for cover and the bag hit a nearby hangar roof, and the owner was none too pleased. >> >> >> >> That said, most folks said it was the most awesome flour bombing attempt they had ever seen. Missed by a mile, but got points for style. >> >> >> >> Of course this was 40 years ago. :-) >> >> >> >> Mark >> >> >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] on behalf of cjpilot710 [cjpilot710@aol.com] >> Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 2:56 PM >> To: yak-list@matronics.com >> Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: Yak-List: Flour Bombing >> >> If we tell you how to do it then you become competition! >> >> However being a good sport what you want to do is line the airplane up (your Center Line with the target) when you can see it, pick-up a point out on one side of the airplane even with the target far enough out so that you can see it when you go directly over the target . Toss the bag of flour out the back or out the front. Do so as the reference point you picked even with the target, is about a foot in front of the Leading Edge of the wing. This is good for a 200-foot altitude at cruise speed. >> >> >> >> Sent via the Samsung GALAXY S 5, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone >> >> >> -------- Original message -------- >> From: Philip Nicholson <pednicholson@gmail.com> >> Date: 8/19/2016 9:36 AM (GMT-05:00) >> To: Yak-List <Yak-List@matronics.com> >> Subject: Yak-List: Flour Bombing >> >> >> Hi guys, >> >> Theres a flour bombing competition at the local strip next weekend. >> >> Does anyone have any clever ideas on releasing the bag of flour? Surely theres a better way than simply heaving it over the side onto the wing and having it slide of. Secondly, does anyone have any tactics they wish to share? i.e., how many feet in front of the target to release whether to toss it or approach level etc? Any formulas? :) >> >> Never done it before so any input welcome. >> >> >> >> Phil N. >> >> Nanchang CJ6A >> >> C-FEPN - Ottawa > > > > >


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:52:40 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: WTB: CJ-6
    From: "n38139" <n38139@yahoo.com>
    n38139@yahoo.com Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=459672#459672


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:52:41 PM PST US
    Subject: Contact Info
    From: "n38139" <n38139@yahoo.com>
    Contact info: n38139@yahoo.com Thanks Steve Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=459671#459671


    Message 20


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:04:56 PM PST US
    From: "Tom Elliott" <n13472@aol.com>
    Subject: Yak-52 Max Altitude
    Cannot speak to the 52, But I had my stock CJ6A at 18,650 ft. verified by ATC going to Kalispell MT. in 2010 on way to Osh. Was up at that altitude for about an hour. Controls were light but responsive. When the cloud deck below broke it was a great VNE decent to the airport!!!!!!!! Just to see how high we could go Hal Morley and I took his plane HANA HOU CJ6A with M14P with fuel injection over the Willamette valley of Or. to 22,500 ft. we were still climbing when we started to get some misfiring . We think it was due to the unpressurized mags ??????????? What a view! Tom Elliott CJ-6A NX63727 777 Quartz Ave PMB 7004 Sandy Valley NV 89019 Cell 541-297-5497 N13472@AOL.COM From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Richard Goode Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 2:07 AM Subject: RE: Yak-List: Yak-52 Max Altitude One doesn't need oxygen for a short trip beyond 13,000 feet =93 pilots in the First World War were patrolling at 20,000 feet! To revert to Yaks, a standard 52 is running out of breath at 13,000 feet, but the real reason is that the Russians don't extend the manuals for an aircraft without oxygen beyond 4000 m. However, nothing to do with the engine capability =93 with a light 18 T; 400 hp; MT prop I was once still climbing (albeit very slowly) at 18,000 feet. Richard Goode Rhodds Farm Lyonshall Hereford HR5 3LW United Kingdom Tel: +94 (0) 81 241 5137 (Sri Lanka) Tel: +44 (0) 1544 340120 Fax: +44 (0) 1544 340129 www.russianaeros.com I=99m currently in Sri Lanka but this Mail is working,and my local phone is +94 779 132 160. From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Mike Beresford Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 1:19 PM Subject: Yak-List: Yak-52 Max Altitude Hi all I've seen a maximum operating altitude for the Yak-52 quoted as 4,000 m (13,000 ft). Obviously this requires pilot oxygen, but is the altitude limitation due to operational procedures, or a technical limitation on the aircraft? Someone suggested to me that the fuel mixture compensation may run out of travel above the altitude limit. Anyone have some insight into the behaviour of the engine above 13,000 ft? Blue skies Mike -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by <http://www.mailscanner.info/> MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.


    Message 21


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:53:10 PM PST US
    From: "Richard Goode" <Richard.goode@russianaeros.com>
    Subject: Flower bombing and more
    I have never posted anything that is non-yak but I think this story is worth it. Probably 25 years ago, at our flying club, a craze for flour-bombing began - initially thrown out of the door of a spam-can, but the technicians became more sophisticated and built a "bomb-rack" under the floor of one of the club Cherokees, so you had, I recollect, four separate "bombs" under the aircraft, and a separate release for each. This led to the idea, since many people want their ashes spread over certain areas after death whereby there was a dispensing funnel in the aircraft going down through some sort of inspection hatch in the floor, the theory being that you would get to the designated area and pour the ashes into the funnel in the aircraft. The system was tried with sand and worked well. For the first real customer, the whole family came to the airfield, and the (adult) daughter, who had never flown before, asked if she could come for the flight, to which the pilot and "bomb-aimer" agreed. They reached the area, and began the ashes-releasing procedure, but of course the dramatic weakness of the technology was that it failed to take into account that ash is somewhat lighter than sand, and there is a noticeable high-pressure area under the aircraft. Within seconds, the entire interior of the aircraft was field with the deceased fellow's ashes, covering everyone, including the daughter. They returned to the airfield; landed and then taxied to the far end where they attempted to clean the plain before they returned to the waiting relatives. They apologised profusely to the daughter who didn't seem to mind and said "no problem - he was a difficult old sod when he was alive!" Richard Goode


    Message 22


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:34:28 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Yak-52 Max Altitude
    From: William Halverson <william@netpros.net>
    Flew my YAK-55 across the Rockies in 2001 or 2 ... the bad forest fire year ... had her up to 14.5k westbound ... no indication she was tired or out of steam. I was surprised at the smell of smoke all the way up to my alt ... a bad year for fires ... Never saw a reason to go higher ... Hal On 8/19/2016 9:04 PM, Tom Elliott wrote: > > Cannot speak to the 52, But I had my stock CJ6A at 18,650 ft. verified > by ATC going to Kalispell MT. > > in 2010 on way to Osh. Was up at that altitude for about an hour. > Controls were light but > > responsive. When the cloud deck below broke it was a great VNE decent > to the airport!!!!!!!! > > Just to see how high we could go Hal Morley and I took his plane HANA > HOU CJ6A with M14P with > > fuel injection over the Willamette valley of Or. to 22,500 ft. we > were still climbing when we started to > > get some misfiring . We think it was due to the unpressurized mags > ??????????? What a view! > > Tom Elliott > CJ-6A NX63727 > 777 Quartz Ave > PMB 7004 > Sandy Valley NV > 89019 > Cell 541-297-5497 > > N13472@AOL.COM > > *From:*owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] *On Behalf Of *Richard Goode > *Sent:* Thursday, August 18, 2016 2:07 AM > *To:* yak-list@matronics.com > *Subject:* RE: Yak-List: Yak-52 Max Altitude > > One doesn't need oxygen for a short trip beyond 13,000 feet pilots > in the First World War were patrolling at 20,000 feet! > > To revert to Yaks, a standard 52 is running out of breath at 13,000 > feet, but the real reason is that the Russians don't extend the > manuals for an aircraft without oxygen beyond 4000 m. However, nothing > to do with the engine capability with a light 18 T; 400 hp; MT prop > I was once still climbing (albeit very slowly) at 18,000 feet. > > Richard Goode > > Rhodds Farm > > Lyonshall > > Hereford > > HR5 3LW > > United Kingdom > > Tel: +94 (0) 81 241 5137 (Sri Lanka) > > Tel: +44 (0) 1544 340120 > > Fax: +44 (0) 1544 340129 > > www.russianaeros.com <http://www.russianaeros.com> > > Im currently in Sri Lanka but this Mail is working,and my local phone > is +94 779 132 160. > > *From:*owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com > <mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com> > [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] *On Behalf Of *Mike Beresford > *Sent:* Thursday, August 18, 2016 1:19 PM > *To:* yak-list@matronics.com <mailto:yak-list@matronics.com> > *Subject:* Yak-List: Yak-52 Max Altitude > > Hi all > > I've seen a maximum operating altitude for the Yak-52 quoted as 4,000 > m (13,000 ft). Obviously this requires pilot oxygen, but is the > altitude limitation due to operational procedures, or a technical > limitation on the aircraft? > > Someone suggested to me that the fuel mixture compensation may run out > of travel above the altitude limit. Anyone have some insight into the > behaviour of the engine above 13,000 ft? > > Blue skies > > Mike > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is > believed to be clean. >


    Message 23


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:57:16 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Flower bombing and more
    From: Jan Mevis <jan.mevis@informavia.be>
    Nice story, thanks!!!! From: <owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com> on behalf of Richard Goode <richard.goode@russianaeros.com> Subject: Yak-List: Flower bombing and more Flower bombing and more I have never posted anything that is non-yak but I think this story is wort h it. Probably 25 years ago, at our flying club, a craze for flour-bombing began =AD initially thrown out of the door of a spam-can, but the technicians became more sophisticated and built a "bomb-rack" under the floor of one of the club Cherokees, so you had, I recollect, four separate "bombs" under the aircraft, and a separate release for each. This led to the idea, since many people want their ashes spread over certai n areas after death whereby there was a dispensing funnel in the aircraft going down through some sort of inspection hatch in the floor, the theory being that you would get to the designated area and pour the ashes into the funnel in the aircraft. The system was tried with sand and worked well. For the first real customer, the whole family came to the airfield, and the (adult) daughter, who had never flown before, asked if she could come for the flight, to which the pilot and "bomb-aimer" agreed. They reached the area, and began the ashes-releasing procedure, but of course the dramatic weakness of the technology was that it failed to take into account that ash is somewhat lighter than sand, and there is a noticeable high-pressure area under the aircraft. Within seconds, the entire interior of the aircraft was field with the deceased fellow=B9s ashes, covering everyone, including the daughter. They returned to the airfield; landed and then taxied to the far end where they attempted to clean the plain before they returned to the waiting relatives. They apologised profusely to the daughter who didn't seem to min d and said "no problem =AD he was a difficult old sod when he was alive!" Richard Goode


    Message 24


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:01:48 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Flour Bombing
    From: Jan Mevis <jan.mevis@informavia.be>
    Nobody filmed this? J. On 20/08/16 00:16, "Bitterlich, Mark G CIV NAVAIR, WD" <owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com on behalf of mark.bitterlich@navy.mil> wrote: ><mark.bitterlich@navy.mil> > >My first flour bombing contest was in a T-34B. Beach N4756 out of Cherry >Point Aero Club. Had a good friend and pilot in the back. We came >zorching in out of a dive and missed the target by a rather embarrassing >amount. Next sack was just as bad. So the decision was, if you can't be >good at the bombing, at least look good in the air. > > >On the next pass I came in and went to the runway... mere feet about the >concrete. The rules gave a minimum RELEASE altitude, but didn't really >specify a hard deck. So, in we came. > > >Somewhat short of the bulls-eye ring, I pulled way too much G for that >old beast and up into the vertical we went. Right before the kick for the >hammerhead my friend in back threw the bag straight out the top of the >canopy. The hammerhead was pretty close to zero airspeed. No arc, and >lots of airframe shaking is the give-away. As I reached the vertical >downline, I swore I could see that bag heading down in front of me, but >it was probably my imagination. > > >After landing, we were banned from further flour bombing. Seems people >were running for cover and the bag hit a nearby hangar roof, and the >owner was none too pleased. > > >That said, most folks said it was the most awesome flour bombing attempt >they had ever seen. Missed by a mile, but got points for style. > > >Of course this was 40 years ago. :-) > > >Mark > > >________________________________ >From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com >[owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] on behalf of cjpilot710 >[cjpilot710@aol.com] >Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 2:56 PM >To: yak-list@matronics.com >Subject: [Non-DoD Source] RE: Yak-List: Flour Bombing > >If we tell you how to do it then you become competition! > >However being a good sport what you want to do is line the airplane up >(your Center Line with the target) when you can see it, pick-up a point >out on one side of the airplane even with the target far enough out so >that you can see it when you go directly over the target . Toss the bag >of flour out the back or out the front. Do so as the reference point >you picked even with the target, is about a foot in front of the Leading >Edge of the wing. This is good for a 200-foot altitude at cruise speed. > > >Sent via the Samsung GALAXY S 5, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone > > >-------- Original message -------- >From: Philip Nicholson <pednicholson@gmail.com> >Date: 8/19/2016 9:36 AM (GMT-05:00) >To: Yak-List <Yak-List@matronics.com> >Subject: Yak-List: Flour Bombing > > >Hi guys, > >Theres a flour bombing competition at the local strip next weekend. > >Does anyone have any clever ideas on releasing the bag of flour? Surely >theres a better way than simply heaving it over the side onto the wing >and having it slide of. Secondly, does anyone have any tactics they wish >to share? i.e., how many feet in front of the target to release whether >to toss it or approach level etc? Any formulas? :) > >Never done it before so any input welcome. > > >Phil N. > >Nanchang CJ6A > >C-FEPN - Ottawa > >




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   yak-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Yak-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/yak-list
  • Browse Yak-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/yak-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --