Yak-List Digest Archive

Fri 01/20/17


Total Messages Posted: 6



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 10:18 AM - Re: Nanchang Company, M14P approval (Walter Lannon)
     2. 02:48 PM -  Re: Nanchang Company, M14P approval (Jill Gernetzke)
     3. 03:14 PM - Re: Nanchang Company, M14P approval (cjpilot710@aol.com)
     4. 05:09 PM - Re: Snot Valve Not Snotting... (Gazoo)
     5. 06:49 PM - Re: Nanchang Company, M14P approval (Walter Lannon)
     6. 07:19 PM - Re: Nanchang Company, M14P approval (Walter Lannon)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:18:11 AM PST US
    From: "Walter Lannon" <wlannon@shaw.ca>
    Subject: Re: Nanchang Company, M14P approval
    No sweat Gary, Done the same and have this distressing habit of proof-reading AFTER I hit send ------not getting smarter?? Walt -----Original Message----- From: Gary Gabbard Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 8:37 PM Subject: Re: Yak-List: Nanchang Company, M14P approval Ooops. Sorry Walter. Once again my error. But the beer still sounds. Must be y week for screwing up. LOL. AND YES WARMER WEATHER. Gary Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 19, 2017, at 19:17, Walter Lannon <wlannon@shaw.ca> wrote: > > and --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:48:46 PM PST US
    From: "Jill Gernetzke" <jill@m-14p.com>
    Subject: Re: Nanchang Company, M14P approval
    As long as we are trying to keep the history correct, the prop hub installed on the engine would have to be for a splined shaft. So it would not be a V-530 hub, but the PZL US-122000 hub for the Wilga. Have a great weekend, Jill M-14P, Inc.


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:14:36 PM PST US
    From: cjpilot710@aol.com
    Subject: Re: Nanchang Company, M14P approval
    Actually the original engine the CJ-6 prototype was Czechoslovakia Doris B engine. Evidently the airplane could not reach design speed and the engine / prop wouldn't match up. That engine was use in one other East block aircraft prototype and never any place else. That was 1958, in 59 they changed to the Soviet A-14P, and "F530D35" prop. As far as I can tell, China has never made horizontal opposed aircraft engine. The Chinese designers had a tough time convincing their government (very pro Russia at the time) that the CJ-6 was better than the Yak 18A which th e Soviets were offering. The A-14p (or HS-6) took care of that. Jim "Pappy" Goolsby In a message dated 1/19/2017 7:57:05 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, ggg6@att.net writes: --> Yak-List message posted by: Gary Gabbard <ggg6@att.net> Hi Craig Yes I am aware of the plan to install a six cyl opposed engine in the CJ originally And you very well may be correct on not being an M14-P installed. The paddle prop pic that I saw helped to make me feel the info might be true. But I stand corrected. Thank You for the info. If I stumble over Florida way on e of these days, I owe you a =F0=9F=8D=BA or =F0=9F=8D=BB two. Later. Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 19, 2017, at 11:00, Walter Lannon <wlannon@shaw.ca> wrote: > > --> Yak-List message posted by: "Walter Lannon" <wlannon@shaw.ca> > > Hi Gary; > > That's a really cute story, kind of like a fairy tale, nice, but not to o accurate. > > The original engine intended for the CJ6 was a 6 cyl. horiz. opposed Chinese design. Installed on the first prototype it was quickly found unacceptable and replaced with the early version of the original Ivchenko engine, the AI14R. That engine went into Chinese production as the Huosai 6 and,later, the 6A. > The propellor installation was the stock, original V530 hub and wooden blades. Chinese designed blades eventually replaced them. > About the same time as your friend (1993) I imported the first CJ's int o Canada directly from China (there were two already here but imported from Texas) > > Cheers; > Walt > > > -----Original Message----- From: Gary Gabbard > Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 1:12 AM > To: yak-list@matronics.com > Subject: Re: Yak-List: Nanchang Company, M14P approval > > --> Yak-List message posted by: Gary Gabbard <ggg6@att.net> > > Gentlemen, as I recall. The CJ was first produced for the PLA, and it originally was delivered into Chinese military service with the Russian M14-P engine . But somewhere along the line they decided they didn't need that much horsepower for a trainer. So China made a deal with Wilga of Poland to manufacture their own engine made by Housi of China. Under license fro m Wilga. So the Airplane and the engine mount are the same as the originall y produced airframe that was originally produced with the M14-P engine. Thi s was learned in a conversation with Ron Bailey of PHX at the time (1995) who was an early importer of the CJ's. He spent a lot of time in China during the time he was importing them to the USA. Since purchasing my CJ from hi m in early (1995). Several years after I purchased the CJ. I lost track of Ron years ago. I believe he moved from PHX years ago, so can't verify thi s by contacting him. I did see a picture of some CJ's with the large paddle blade props on them ! > that I believe Ron took them on one of his trips to China. The large square paddle blades would indicate that it was equipped with the M14-P. And that was before anyone was installing M14-P engines in them here in the USA as I recall. I have had my CJ for 22 years. Ok maybe if anyone has contacts in China you could verify that the Airplane was produced original ly with the M14-P. Good luck on your search. Hope this small amount of info may help you. > Gary. In Las Vegas, Nevada. CJ N22YK. > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Jan 18, 2017, at 19:25, Richard Goode <richard.goode@russianaeros.com> wrote: >> <richard.goode@russianaeros.com> >> >> I'm not an expert on how these things are handled in North America, bu t >> surely an STC is approval for a modification onto a certified aircraft , and >> of course the Nanchang is completely "experimental", and in the USA owners >> have the fantastic good fortune to be able to do pretty much what they like >> in terms of modifications and engine changes. >> >> Interestingly we in the UK are allowed to fly Yak 50 and 52 only on th e >> basis that they are "ex-military", since we do not have any form of an >> experimental category. The Nanchang, similarly, fits into the same category. >> >> We have recently sold an M 14 P to a UK customer to put into his Nanchang, >> but he is having a bureaucratic nightmare with UK CAA to authorise the >> conversion. They have asked for stress calculations on the engine mounts; >> proof that the engine will be sufficiently cooled et cetera. >> >> I would be very doubtful whether there is any "official" documentation from >> China authorising the installation of the Russian engine, but I could be >> wrong! >> >> Richard Goode >> >> Rhodds Farm >> Lyonshall >> Hereford >> HR5 3LW >> United Kingdom >> Tel: +94 (0) 81 241 5137 (Sri Lanka) >> Tel: +44 (0) 1544 340120 >> Fax: +44 (0) 1544 340129 >> www.russianaeros.com >> I=99m currently in Sri Lanka but this Mail is working,and my loc al phone is >> +94 779 132 160. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com >> [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Top Ace >> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 10:38 PM >> To: yak-list@matronics.com >> Subject: Yak-List: Nanchang Company, M14P approval >> >> >> Installation of a M-14P on a CJ.,,, I know many of the CJ owners have >> installed the MP-14P engine in the United States,, which is or was approved >> by the FAA,,, Here in Canada,, Transport Canada does not recognize any other >> motor then the Housai, I would like to install the M14P on my aircraft . >> I would need a field or an STC from them to install it here in Canada, ,, >> >> I am aware of one MP-14 installed here in Canada !!! 1999,, which at the >> time, he was allotted an stc based on a letter that was written from >> Nanchang at the time that this was a approved engine that could be >> installed. ( Lost, filed away, or misplaced copy) >> >> Question if any one can help is,, does anyone have a copy, or have >> documentation from Nanchang that it is allowed. I sure would like to have >> this so I can present my case to Transport Canada. >> Have only owned this Cj since June,,, you folks have had them for 20 years >> plus,, appreciate any help you could send my way. >> David >> >> >> >> >> Read this topic online here: >> >> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=465193#465193 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by >> MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > https://www.avast.com/antivirus > > > > ======================== =========== ======================== =========== ======================== =========== ======================== =========== ======================== ===========


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:09:00 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Snot Valve Not Snotting...
    From: "Gazoo" <stefancorriveau@hotmail.com>
    Thanks for posting Craig. I had the same problem. Annual is next week so snot valve cleaning it is. -------- Stefan Corriveau stefancorriveau@hotmail.com Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=465287#465287


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:49:07 PM PST US
    From: "Walter Lannon" <wlannon@shaw.ca>
    Subject: Re: Nanchang Company, M14P approval
    Jill: The number you are quoting for the PZL Wilga prop. hub is actually the design number of the blade, not the hub. If you could take the time and actually look at one you will see the hub design number is V530 - T35. The M14P uses the same BASIC design number but with a very different dash number. Walt -----Original Message----- From: Jill Gernetzke Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 2:48 PM Subject: Re: Yak-List: Nanchang Company, M14P approval As long as we are trying to keep the history correct, the prop hub installed on the engine would have to be for a splined shaft. So it would not be a V-530 hub, but the PZL US-122000 hub for the Wilga. Have a great weekend, Jill M-14P, Inc. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:19:22 PM PST US
    From: "Walter Lannon" <wlannon@shaw.ca>
    Subject: Re: Nanchang Company, M14P approval
    Thanks Pappy; I had forgotten the name of the Czech engine (Doris B). The final radial engine choice was the AI14R, later AI14RA Translation : Alexander Ivchenco, Model 14, Radial, Air start. There was a later version with electric start: AI14RC. Cylinders manufac tured for the C engine will not work on the A due no provision for air inje ction. Cheers; Walt From: cjpilot710@aol.com Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 3:14 PM Subject: Re: Yak-List: Nanchang Company, M14P approval Actually the original engine the CJ-6 prototype was Czechoslovakia Doris B engine. Evidently the airplane could not reach design speed and the engine / prop wouldn't match up. That engine was use in one other East block air craft prototype and never any place else. That was 1958, in 59 they change d to the Soviet A-14P, and "F530D35" prop. As far as I can tell, China has never made horizontal opposed aircraft engine. The Chinese designers had a tough time convincing their government (very pr o Russia at the time) that the CJ-6 was better than the Yak 18A which the S oviets were offering. The A-14p (or HS-6) took care of that. Jim "Pappy" Goolsby In a message dated 1/19/2017 7:57:05 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, ggg6@att.n et writes: Hi Craig Yes I am aware of the plan to install a six cyl opposed engine in the CJ originally And you very well may be correct on not being an M14-P installed. The pad dle prop pic that I saw helped to make me feel the info might be true. But I stand corrected. Thank You for the info. If I stumble over Florida way on e of these days, I owe you a =F0=9F=8D=BA or =F0=9F=8D=BB two. Later. Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 19, 2017, at 11:00, Walter Lannon <wlannon@shaw.ca> wrote: > > > Hi Gary; > > That's a really cute story, kind of like a fairy tale, nice, but not to o accurate. > > The original engine intended for the CJ6 was a 6 cyl. horiz. opposed Ch inese design. Installed on the first prototype it was quickly found unacc eptable and replaced with the early version of the original Ivchenko engine , the AI14R. That engine went into Chinese production as the Huosai 6 and ,later, the 6A. > The propellor installation was the stock, original V530 hub and wooden blades. Chinese designed blades eventually replaced them. > About the same time as your friend (1993) I imported the first CJ's int o Canada directly from China (there were two already here but imported from Texas) > > Cheers; > Walt > > > -----Original Message----- From: Gary Gabbard > Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 1:12 AM > To: yak-list@matronics.com > Subject: Re: Yak-List: Nanchang Company, M14P approval > > > Gentlemen, as I recall. The CJ was first produced for the PLA, and it originally was delivered into Chinese military service with the Russian M14 -P engine . But somewhere along the line they decided they didn't need that much horsepower for a trainer. So China made a deal with Wilga of Poland to manufacture their own engine made by Housi of China. Under license from Wilga. So the Airplane and the engine mount are the same as the originally produced airframe that was originally produced with the M14-P engine. This was learned in a conversation with Ron Bailey of PHX at the time (1995) who was an early importer of the CJ's. He spent a lot of time in China during the time he was importing them to the USA. Since purchasing my CJ from him in early (1995). Several years after I purchased the CJ. I lost track of R on years ago. I believe he moved from PHX years ago, so can't verify this b y contacting him. I did see a picture of some CJ's with the large paddle bl ade props on them ! > that I believe Ron took them on one of his trips to China. The large sq uare paddle blades would indicate that it was equipped with the M14-P. And that was before anyone was installing M14-P engines in them here in the US A as I recall. I have had my CJ for 22 years. Ok maybe if anyone has contac ts in China you could verify that the Airplane was produced originally with the M14-P. Good luck on your search. Hope this small amount of info may h elp you. > Gary. In Las Vegas, Nevada. CJ N22YK. > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Jan 18, 2017, at 19:25, Richard Goode <richard.goode@russianaeros.c om> wrote: >> aeros.com> >> >> I'm not an expert on how these things are handled in North America, bu t >> surely an STC is approval for a modification onto a certified aircraft , and >> of course the Nanchang is completely "experimental", and in the USA ow ners >> have the fantastic good fortune to be able to do pretty much what they like >> in terms of modifications and engine changes. >> >> Interestingly we in the UK are allowed to fly Yak 50 and 52 only on th e >> basis that they are "ex-military", since we do not have any form of an >> experimental category. The Nanchang, similarly, fits into the same cat egory. >> >> We have recently sold an M 14 P to a UK customer to put into his Nanch ang, >> but he is having a bureaucratic nightmare with UK CAA to authorise the >> conversion. They have asked for stress calculations on the engine moun ts; >> proof that the engine will be sufficiently cooled et cetera. >> >> I would be very doubtful whether there is any "official" documentation from >> China authorising the installation of the Russian engine, but I could be >> wrong! >> >> Richard Goode >> >> Rhodds Farm >> Lyonshall >> Hereford >> HR5 3LW >> United Kingdom >> Tel: +94 (0) 81 241 5137 (Sri Lanka) >> Tel: +44 (0) 1544 340120 >> Fax: +44 (0) 1544 340129 >> www.russianaeros.com >> I=99m currently in Sri Lanka but this Mail is working,and my loc al phone is >> +94 779 132 160. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com >> [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Top Ace >> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 10:38 PM >> To: yak-list@matronics.com >> Subject: Yak-List: Nanchang Company, M14P approval >> >> >> Installation of a M-14P on a CJ.,,, I know many of the CJ owners have >> installed the MP-14P engine in the United States,, which is or was app roved >> by the FAA,,, Here in Canada,, Transport Canada does not recognize any other >> motor then the Housai, I would like to install the M14P on my aircraft =2E >> I would need a field or an STC from them to install it here in Canada, ,, >> >> I am aware of one MP-14 installed here in Canada !!! 1999,, which at t he >> time, he was allotted an stc based on a letter that was written from >> Nanchang at the time that this was a approved engine that could be >> installed. ( Lost, filed away, or misplaced copy) >> >> Question if any one can help is,, does anyone have a copy, or have >> documentation from Nanchang that it is allowed. I sure would like to h ave >> this so I can present my case to Transport Canada. >> Have only owned this Cj since June,,, you folks have had them for 20 y ears >> plus,, appreciate any help you could send my way. >> David >> >> >> >> >> Read this topic online here: >> >> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=465193#465193 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by >> MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > https://www.avast.com/antivirus > > > > ======================= =e ties Day ==================== === - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS ========= ============== - NEW MATRONICS LIST ====================== === --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   yak-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Yak-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/yak-list
  • Browse Yak-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/yak-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --