Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 03:00 AM - Hydro tests (Jay McIntyre)
2. 05:17 AM - Re: Hydro tests (Bill Geipel)
3. 08:20 AM - Re: Hydro tests (doug sapp)
4. 08:29 AM - Re: Hydro tests (JON BLAKE)
5. 08:41 AM - Re: Hydro tests (George S. Coy)
6. 11:47 AM - Re: Hydro tests (dbflr)
7. 01:17 PM - Prop For Sale : 0 hours SOH, MT 3-Blade MTV-9 Elliptical 'Focke-Wulf' Style (Marco Caflisch)
8. 05:53 PM - Re: Re: Hydro tests (Tom Elliott)
9. 06:36 PM - Re: Re: Hydro tests (William Geipel)
10. 08:48 PM - Re: Hydro tests (dbflr)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
I think the thing is that most governing bodies determine that ANY 'pressure body'
requires hydrostatic test regardless of material or substance in the body...
makes sense to me...
Jay McIntyre
Director / LAME / IA
JEM Aviation Ltd
www.jemaviation.co.nz
Typos courtesy of Apple!
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Agree. Its a pressure vessel.
> On Mar 23, 2018, at 18:59, Jay McIntyre <cjaviator@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> I think the thing is that most governing bodies determine that ANY 'pressure
body' requires hydrostatic test regardless of material or substance in the body...
makes sense to me...
>
> Jay McIntyre
> Director / LAME / IA
> JEM Aviation Ltd
> www.jemaviation.co.nz
>
> Typos courtesy of Apple!
>
>
>
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
I can only quote the mfg. But that being said I learned a long time ago
that what might makes sense to me is often not the case with the various
regulatory agencies.
Doug
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 2:59 AM, Jay McIntyre <cjaviator@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I think the thing is that most governing bodies determine that ANY
> 'pressure body' requires hydrostatic test regardless of material or
> substance in the body... makes sense to me...
>
> Jay McIntyre
> Director / LAME / IA
> JEM Aviation Ltd
> www.jemaviation.co.nz
>
> Typos courtesy of Apple!
>
>
Message 4
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Doug, I think we can all say we've learned that same lesson with respect to those
regulatory agencies. JB
> On March 23, 2018 at 10:20 AM doug sapp <dougsappllc@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I can only quote the mfg. But that being said I learned a long time ago
that what might makes sense to me is often not the case with the various regulatory
agencies.
>
> Doug
>
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 2:59 AM, Jay McIntyre <cjaviator@gmail.com mailto:cjaviator@gmail.com > wrote:
>
I think the thing is that most governing bodies determine that ANY 'pressure body'
requires hydrostatic test regardless of material or substance in the body...
makes sense to me...
Jay McIntyre
Director / LAME / IA
JEM Aviation Ltd
http://www.jemaviation.co.nz
Typos courtesy of Apple!
===================================
List" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
===================================
FORUMS -
eferrer" target="_blank">http://forums.matronics.com
===================================
WIKI -
errer" target="_blank">http://wiki.matronics.com
===================================
b Site -
-Matt Dralle, List Admin.
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
===================================
Message 5
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Guys, I believe it is an ICC (interstate commerce commission?) rule for
any pressure vessel. I believe there are other possible causes of
failure besides corrosion. (Stress related due to many times filling and
emptying the vessel comes to mind).
Geroge Coy
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of JON BLAKE
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2018 11:30 AM
Subject: Re: Yak-List: Hydro tests
Doug, I think we can all say we've learned that same lesson with respect
to those regulatory agencies. JB
On March 23, 2018 at 10:20 AM doug sapp <dougsappllc@gmail.com
<mailto:dougsappllc@gmail.com> > wrote:
I can only quote the mfg. But that being said I learned a long time ago
that what might makes sense to me is often not the case with the various
regulatory agencies.
Doug
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 2:59 AM, Jay McIntyre <cjaviator@gmail.com
<mailto:cjaviator@gmail.com> > wrote:
<mailto:cjaviator@gmail.com> >
I think the thing is that most governing bodies determine that ANY
'pressure body' requires hydrostatic test regardless of material or
substance in the body... makes sense to me...
Jay McIntyre
Director / LAME / IA
JEM Aviation Ltd
www.jemaviation.co.nz <http://www.jemaviation.co.nz>
Typos courtesy of Apple!
List" rel="noreferrer"
target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
FORUMS -
eferrer" target="_blank">http://forums.matronics.com
WIKI -
errer" target="_blank">http://wiki.matronics.com
b Site -
-Matt Dralle, List Admin.
rel="noreferrer"
target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
Message 6
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
DOT regulates pressure vessels use and certification. DOT standard # is written
on each and every tank used by scuba divers, firefighters, airlines, etc. Penalties
are specified as well. instead of pointless discussion "who thinks what
" about hydrotesting - just read CFR
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=478821#478821
Message 7
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Prop For Sale : 0 hours SOH, MT 3-Blade MTV-9 Elliptical 'Focke-Wulf' |
Style
Hi fellow Yak and 'Chang drivers,
Wanted to see if any of you may be interested in the 0 hours since overhaul
MT 3-blade MTV-9-K-C/CL248-63 elliptical 'Focke-Wulf' style propeller my
co-owner and I are selling
The prop was manufactured in 2006 and has just returned from the MT factory
in Germany with 0 hours since a complete overhaul of the hub, blades and
leading edges. This is as close to a new prop as you can get! The prop is
now located at MT in Florida - buyer pays shipping. Asking $9,250.
Contact Marco Caflisch (co-owner) - located Palo Alto, CA USA. Tel:
650-353-1168. Email marco.l.caflisch@gmail.com
Link on Barnstormers:
https://www.barnstormers.com/classified_1351705_MT+3-Blade+Fokke+Wulf+Prop.html
Happy flying!
Marco
Message 8
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
And are you trying to tell me the Chinese's gave a shit what DOT thinks. And
our Russian or Chinese tanks
DO NOT have any DOT numbers on them.
Tom Elliott
CJ-6A NX63727
777 Quartz Ave
PMB 7004
Sandy Valley NV.
89019
Cell 541-297-5497
N13472@AOL.COM
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of dbflr
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2018 11:47 AM
Subject: Yak-List: Re: Hydro tests
DOT regulates pressure vessels use and certification. DOT standard # is
written on each and every tank used by scuba divers, firefighters, airlines,
etc. Penalties are specified as well. instead of pointless discussion "who
thinks what " about hydrotesting - just read CFR
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=478821#478821
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
Message 9
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Im sure the Russians stamped each tank with a DOT standard #.
> On Mar 23, 2018, at 12:47, dbflr <le_vix@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> DOT regulates pressure vessels use and certification. DOT standard # is written
on each and every tank used by scuba divers, firefighters, airlines, etc. Penalties
are specified as well. instead of pointless discussion "who thinks what
" about hydrotesting - just read CFR
>
>
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=478821#478821
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Message 10
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
tell it to NTSB or FAA if your tank explodes. i'm sure they'll be impressed
n13472(at)aol.com wrote:
> And are you trying to tell me the Chinese's gave a shit what DOT thinks. And
> our Russian or Chinese tanks
> DO NOT have any DOT numbers on them.
>
>
> Tom Elliott
> CJ-6A NX63727
> 777 Quartz Ave
> PMB 7004
> Sandy Valley NV.
> 89019
> Cell 541-297-5497
> N13472@AOL.COM
>
>
>
> --
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=478836#478836
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|