---------------------------------------------------------- Yak-List Digest Archive --- Total Messages Posted Fri 03/23/18: 10 ---------------------------------------------------------- Today's Message Index: ---------------------- 1. 03:00 AM - Hydro tests (Jay McIntyre) 2. 05:17 AM - Re: Hydro tests (Bill Geipel) 3. 08:20 AM - Re: Hydro tests (doug sapp) 4. 08:29 AM - Re: Hydro tests (JON BLAKE) 5. 08:41 AM - Re: Hydro tests (George S. Coy) 6. 11:47 AM - Re: Hydro tests (dbflr) 7. 01:17 PM - Prop For Sale : 0 hours SOH, MT 3-Blade MTV-9 Elliptical 'Focke-Wulf' Style (Marco Caflisch) 8. 05:53 PM - Re: Re: Hydro tests (Tom Elliott) 9. 06:36 PM - Re: Re: Hydro tests (William Geipel) 10. 08:48 PM - Re: Hydro tests (dbflr) ________________________________ Message 1 _____________________________________ Time: 03:00:23 AM PST US Subject: Yak-List: Hydro tests From: Jay McIntyre I think the thing is that most governing bodies determine that ANY 'pressure body' requires hydrostatic test regardless of material or substance in the body... makes sense to me... Jay McIntyre Director / LAME / IA JEM Aviation Ltd www.jemaviation.co.nz Typos courtesy of Apple! ________________________________ Message 2 _____________________________________ Time: 05:17:29 AM PST US From: Bill Geipel Subject: Re: Yak-List: Hydro tests Agree. Its a pressure vessel. > On Mar 23, 2018, at 18:59, Jay McIntyre wrote: > > > I think the thing is that most governing bodies determine that ANY 'pressure body' requires hydrostatic test regardless of material or substance in the body... makes sense to me... > > Jay McIntyre > Director / LAME / IA > JEM Aviation Ltd > www.jemaviation.co.nz > > Typos courtesy of Apple! > > > ________________________________ Message 3 _____________________________________ Time: 08:20:52 AM PST US From: doug sapp Subject: Re: Yak-List: Hydro tests I can only quote the mfg. But that being said I learned a long time ago that what might makes sense to me is often not the case with the various regulatory agencies. Doug On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 2:59 AM, Jay McIntyre wrote: > > I think the thing is that most governing bodies determine that ANY > 'pressure body' requires hydrostatic test regardless of material or > substance in the body... makes sense to me... > > Jay McIntyre > Director / LAME / IA > JEM Aviation Ltd > www.jemaviation.co.nz > > Typos courtesy of Apple! > > ________________________________ Message 4 _____________________________________ Time: 08:29:56 AM PST US From: JON BLAKE Subject: Re: Yak-List: Hydro tests Doug, I think we can all say we've learned that same lesson with respect to those regulatory agencies. JB > On March 23, 2018 at 10:20 AM doug sapp wrote: > > I can only quote the mfg. But that being said I learned a long time ago that what might makes sense to me is often not the case with the various regulatory agencies. > > Doug > > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 2:59 AM, Jay McIntyre wrote: > I think the thing is that most governing bodies determine that ANY 'pressure body' requires hydrostatic test regardless of material or substance in the body... makes sense to me... Jay McIntyre Director / LAME / IA JEM Aviation Ltd http://www.jemaviation.co.nz Typos courtesy of Apple! =================================== List" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List =================================== FORUMS - eferrer" target="_blank">http://forums.matronics.com =================================== WIKI - errer" target="_blank">http://wiki.matronics.com =================================== b Site - -Matt Dralle, List Admin. rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution =================================== ________________________________ Message 5 _____________________________________ Time: 08:41:47 AM PST US From: "George S. Coy" Subject: RE: Yak-List: Hydro tests Guys, I believe it is an ICC (interstate commerce commission?) rule for any pressure vessel. I believe there are other possible causes of failure besides corrosion. (Stress related due to many times filling and emptying the vessel comes to mind). Geroge Coy From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of JON BLAKE Sent: Friday, March 23, 2018 11:30 AM Subject: Re: Yak-List: Hydro tests Doug, I think we can all say we've learned that same lesson with respect to those regulatory agencies. JB On March 23, 2018 at 10:20 AM doug sapp > wrote: I can only quote the mfg. But that being said I learned a long time ago that what might makes sense to me is often not the case with the various regulatory agencies. Doug On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 2:59 AM, Jay McIntyre > wrote: > I think the thing is that most governing bodies determine that ANY 'pressure body' requires hydrostatic test regardless of material or substance in the body... makes sense to me... Jay McIntyre Director / LAME / IA JEM Aviation Ltd www.jemaviation.co.nz Typos courtesy of Apple! List" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List FORUMS - eferrer" target="_blank">http://forums.matronics.com WIKI - errer" target="_blank">http://wiki.matronics.com b Site - -Matt Dralle, List Admin. rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution ________________________________ Message 6 _____________________________________ Time: 11:47:39 AM PST US Subject: Yak-List: Re: Hydro tests From: "dbflr" DOT regulates pressure vessels use and certification. DOT standard # is written on each and every tank used by scuba divers, firefighters, airlines, etc. Penalties are specified as well. instead of pointless discussion "who thinks what " about hydrotesting - just read CFR Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=478821#478821 ________________________________ Message 7 _____________________________________ Time: 01:17:11 PM PST US From: Marco Caflisch Subject: Yak-List: Prop For Sale : 0 hours SOH, MT 3-Blade MTV-9 Elliptical 'Focke-Wulf' Style Hi fellow Yak and 'Chang drivers, Wanted to see if any of you may be interested in the 0 hours since overhaul MT 3-blade MTV-9-K-C/CL248-63 elliptical 'Focke-Wulf' style propeller my co-owner and I are selling The prop was manufactured in 2006 and has just returned from the MT factory in Germany with 0 hours since a complete overhaul of the hub, blades and leading edges. This is as close to a new prop as you can get! The prop is now located at MT in Florida - buyer pays shipping. Asking $9,250. Contact Marco Caflisch (co-owner) - located Palo Alto, CA USA. Tel: 650-353-1168. Email marco.l.caflisch@gmail.com Link on Barnstormers: https://www.barnstormers.com/classified_1351705_MT+3-Blade+Fokke+Wulf+Prop.html Happy flying! Marco ________________________________ Message 8 _____________________________________ Time: 05:53:50 PM PST US From: "Tom Elliott" Subject: RE: Yak-List: Re: Hydro tests And are you trying to tell me the Chinese's gave a shit what DOT thinks. And our Russian or Chinese tanks DO NOT have any DOT numbers on them. Tom Elliott CJ-6A NX63727 777 Quartz Ave PMB 7004 Sandy Valley NV. 89019 Cell 541-297-5497 N13472@AOL.COM -----Original Message----- From: owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of dbflr Sent: Friday, March 23, 2018 11:47 AM Subject: Yak-List: Re: Hydro tests DOT regulates pressure vessels use and certification. DOT standard # is written on each and every tank used by scuba divers, firefighters, airlines, etc. Penalties are specified as well. instead of pointless discussion "who thinks what " about hydrotesting - just read CFR Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=478821#478821 --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com ________________________________ Message 9 _____________________________________ Time: 06:36:54 PM PST US Subject: Re: Yak-List: Re: Hydro tests From: William Geipel Im sure the Russians stamped each tank with a DOT standard #. > On Mar 23, 2018, at 12:47, dbflr wrote: > > > DOT regulates pressure vessels use and certification. DOT standard # is written on each and every tank used by scuba divers, firefighters, airlines, etc. Penalties are specified as well. instead of pointless discussion "who thinks what " about hydrotesting - just read CFR > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=478821#478821 > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ Message 10 ____________________________________ Time: 08:48:50 PM PST US Subject: Yak-List: Re: Hydro tests From: "dbflr" tell it to NTSB or FAA if your tank explodes. i'm sure they'll be impressed n13472(at)aol.com wrote: > And are you trying to tell me the Chinese's gave a shit what DOT thinks. And > our Russian or Chinese tanks > DO NOT have any DOT numbers on them. > > > Tom Elliott > CJ-6A NX63727 > 777 Quartz Ave > PMB 7004 > Sandy Valley NV. > 89019 > Cell 541-297-5497 > N13472@AOL.COM > > > > -- Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=478836#478836 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Other Matronics Email List Services ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Post A New Message yak-list@matronics.com UN/SUBSCRIBE http://www.matronics.com/subscription List FAQ http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Yak-List.htm Web Forum Interface To Lists http://forums.matronics.com Matronics List Wiki http://wiki.matronics.com Full Archive Search Engine http://www.matronics.com/search 7-Day List Browse http://www.matronics.com/browse/yak-list Browse Digests http://www.matronics.com/digest/yak-list Browse Other Lists http://www.matronics.com/browse Live Online Chat! http://www.matronics.com/chat Archive Downloading http://www.matronics.com/archives Photo Share http://www.matronics.com/photoshare Other Email Lists http://www.matronics.com/emaillists Contributions http://www.matronics.com/contribution ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.