Yak-List Digest Archive

Tue 05/09/23


Total Messages Posted: 6



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 03:49 PM - CJ6A No7 Aileron Push rod (Ttail)
     2. 04:06 PM - Re: CJ6A No7 Aileron Push rod (Mark Pennington)
     3. 04:35 PM - Re: CJ6A No7 Aileron Push rod (Mark Pennington)
     4. 04:40 PM - Re: CJ6A No7 Aileron Push rod (Mark Pennington)
     5. 05:02 PM - Re: CJ6A No7 Aileron Push rod (Ttail)
     6. 05:14 PM - Re: Re: CJ6A No7 Aileron Push rod (Mark Pennington)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:49:49 PM PST US
    Subject: CJ6A No7 Aileron Push rod
    From: "Ttail" <ttail@internode.on.net>
    Went looking to change some No7 Aileron Push rods Part H2-51316-00 Was informed that there were two variations of it.Maintenance books don't mention two variants. Image below shows the Two variations. the differences on the thickness of the end pieces. Went and looked at 2 difference's6's both had the "FAT" rod installed on the Starboard Aileron and the "THIN" rod installed on the Port aileron. anyone know the deal with this ? https://i.postimg.cc/2j9KrYYY/No7-Aileronpushrodslbl.jpg -------- Sean Trestrail ttail[at]internode.on.net Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=510766#510766


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:06:46 PM PST US
    From: Mark Pennington <pennington.construction.inc.1@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: CJ6A No7 Aileron Push rod
    Sean I have worked with this on my CJ. Feel free to five me a call Mark Pennington N621CJ On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 6:53 PM Ttail <ttail@internode.on.net> wrote: > > Went looking to change some No7 Aileron Push rods Part H2-51316-00 Was > informed that there were two variations of it.Maintenance books don't > mention two variants. > > Image below shows the Two variations. the differences on the thickness of > the end pieces. > > Went and looked at 2 difference's6's both had the "FAT" rod installed on > the Starboard Aileron and the "THIN" rod installed on the Port aileron. > > anyone know the deal with this ? > > https://i.postimg.cc/2j9KrYYY/No7-Aileronpushrodslbl.jpg > > -------- > Sean Trestrail > ttail[at]internode.on.net > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=510766#510766 > > > -- Replied from my iPhone. Please excuse brevity any typos in the content


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:35:45 PM PST US
    From: Mark Pennington <pennington.construction.inc.1@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: CJ6A No7 Aileron Push rod
    Sean My phone number. Left this off of first response 804 399 4224. Mark Pennington On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 6:53 PM Ttail <ttail@internode.on.net> wrote: > > Went looking to change some No7 Aileron Push rods Part H2-51316-00 Was > informed that there were two variations of it.Maintenance books don't > mention two variants. > > Image below shows the Two variations. the differences on the thickness of > the end pieces. > > Went and looked at 2 difference's6's both had the "FAT" rod installed on > the Starboard Aileron and the "THIN" rod installed on the Port aileron. > > anyone know the deal with this ? > > https://i.postimg.cc/2j9KrYYY/No7-Aileronpushrodslbl.jpg > > -------- > Sean Trestrail > ttail[at]internode.on.net > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=510766#510766 > > > -- Replied from my iPhone. Please excuse brevity any typos in the content


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:40:57 PM PST US
    From: Mark Pennington <pennington.construction.inc.1@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: CJ6A No7 Aileron Push rod
    Sean I have worked on the push rod on my CJ. Give me a call 804 399 4224. Mark On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 6:53 PM Ttail <ttail@internode.on.net> wrote: > > Went looking to change some No7 Aileron Push rods Part H2-51316-00 Was > informed that there were two variations of it.Maintenance books don't > mention two variants. > > Image below shows the Two variations. the differences on the thickness of > the end pieces. > > Went and looked at 2 difference's6's both had the "FAT" rod installed on > the Starboard Aileron and the "THIN" rod installed on the Port aileron. > > anyone know the deal with this ? > > https://i.postimg.cc/2j9KrYYY/No7-Aileronpushrodslbl.jpg > > -------- > Sean Trestrail > ttail[at]internode.on.net > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=510766#510766 > > > -- Replied from my iPhone. Please excuse brevity any typos in the content


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:02:03 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: CJ6A No7 Aileron Push rod
    From: "Ttail" <ttail@internode.on.net>
    Gooday Mark. Probably better by Facetime/Zoom or something else. I am in Australia so phone calls not really practical. I have no issues changing the rods just trying to understand why there are two differrent variants. -------- Sean Trestrail ttail[at]internode.on.net Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=510770#510770


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:14:39 PM PST US
    From: Mark Pennington <pennington.construction.inc.1@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: CJ6A No7 Aileron Push rod
    There is no reason. There just are. Typical part variations for long term production of anything. Either should fit in your plane. Either would fit in my 1974 CJ aircraft. Mark On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 8:06 PM Ttail <ttail@internode.on.net> wrote: > > Gooday Mark. > > Probably better by Facetime/Zoom or something else. I am in Australia so > phone calls not really practical. > > I have no issues changing the rods just trying to understand why there are > two differrent variants. > > -------- > Sean Trestrail > ttail[at]internode.on.net > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=510770#510770 > > > -- Replied from my iPhone. Please excuse brevity any typos in the content




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   yak-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Yak-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/yak-list
  • Browse Yak-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/yak-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --