Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 12:00 AM - Manual for 701SP (Jari.Kaija@pkcgroup.com)
2. 02:38 AM - Re: 912S Hard Starting (Phil & Michele Miller)
3. 03:43 AM - Re: Mitchell Instruments... (RoyN9869L@aol.com)
4. 04:11 AM - 601HD Joy Stick (CBRxxDRV@aol.com)
5. 06:16 AM - Re: Flight Service Station (Dave Alberti)
6. 07:13 AM - Re: Mitchell Instruments... (Don Honabach)
7. 07:19 AM - Re: 601HD Joy Stick (Don Honabach)
8. 07:55 AM - Re: 601HD Joy Stick (Don Walker)
9. 08:52 AM - Header tank (Rockin Rim Ranch, Inc.)
10. 09:13 AM - Re: 601HD Joy Stick (Paul Sharpe)
11. 09:17 AM - Re: Header tank (ZodiacBuilder@aol.com)
12. 09:21 AM - Re: Header tank (Paul Sharpe)
13. 09:24 AM - Re: Header tank (Mark A. Wood)
14. 10:39 AM - Re: Get scientific was Too many Zodiacs down! (Garrou, Douglas)
15. 10:46 AM - Re: Header tank (Rockin Rim Ranch, Inc.)
16. 10:46 AM - Re: Header tank (Rockin Rim Ranch, Inc.)
17. 10:47 AM - Re: Header tank (Rockin Rim Ranch, Inc.)
18. 11:33 AM - extra storage behind seat (CLOJAN@aol.com)
19. 11:54 AM - Re: Header tank (Mark A. Wood)
20. 11:59 AM - Re: 601HD Joy Stick (CBRxxDRV@aol.com)
21. 12:34 PM - Re: Header tank (Rockin Rim Ranch, Inc.)
22. 12:35 PM - Re: XL extra storage behind seat (wizard-24@juno.com)
23. 12:45 PM - Re: Mitchell Instruments... (RoyN9869L@aol.com)
24. 01:14 PM - Re: Header tank (Ray Montagne)
25. 01:35 PM - Re: Header tank (Bill Steer)
26. 01:39 PM - silicon carbide (Flydog1966@aol.com)
27. 02:13 PM - Re: silicon carbide (Fred or Sandy Hulen)
28. 02:27 PM - Re: silicon carbide (Flydog1966@aol.com)
29. 02:44 PM - Re: Header tank (Rockin Rim Ranch, Inc.)
30. 02:51 PM - Re: Header tank (Ray Montagne)
31. 02:52 PM - Re: Mitchell Instruments... (Grant Corriveau)
32. 02:54 PM - KAWO - Arlington (Ray Montagne)
33. 02:57 PM - Re: Header tank (Dave Alberti)
34. 03:03 PM - Re: 601HD Joy Stick (Grant Corriveau)
35. 03:05 PM - Re: silicon carbide (Fred or Sandy Hulen)
36. 03:12 PM - Re: extra storage behind seat (Larry McFarland)
37. 03:26 PM - Re: Get scientific was Too many Zodiacs down! (Benford2@aol.com)
38. 03:28 PM - Re: Header tank (Rockin Rim Ranch, Inc.)
39. 03:29 PM - Re: Header tank (Rockin Rim Ranch, Inc.)
40. 03:29 PM - Re: KAWO - Arlington (Frank Stutzman)
41. 03:33 PM - Re: 601HD Joy Stick (Rockin Rim Ranch, Inc.)
42. 03:36 PM - Re: KAWO - Arlington (Kurt Kingston)
43. 03:38 PM - Re: Mitchell Instruments... [bcc][faked-from] (Don Honabach)
44. 03:39 PM - CH 701 float performance (Kurt Kingston)
45. 03:40 PM - 4130 Steel Plate - Cutting... (Don Honabach)
46. 04:01 PM - Re: 4130 Steel Plate - Cutting... (Jim Cullen)
47. 04:11 PM - Re: 601HD Joy Stick (Jackie B. Johnson)
48. 04:20 PM - Re: Header tank (Pwalsh4539@aol.com)
49. 04:20 PM - Re: 4130 Steel Plate - Cutting... (Don Honabach)
50. 04:25 PM - Re: KAWO - Arlington (Ray Montagne)
51. 04:26 PM - Re: Header tank (Pwalsh4539@aol.com)
52. 04:27 PM - Re: 912S Hard Starting (Dave Austin)
53. 04:29 PM - Re: Header tank (Ray Montagne)
54. 04:29 PM - Re: Header tank (Pwalsh4539@aol.com)
55. 05:06 PM - Re: Header tank (Safety concern) (Gary Gower)
56. 05:06 PM - Re: 4130 Steel Plate - Cutting... (Michel Therrien)
57. 05:25 PM - Re: extra storage behind seat (Michel Therrien)
58. 05:43 PM - Re: Header tank (Philip Polstra)
59. 05:44 PM - Re: Header tank (Rockin Rim Ranch, Inc.)
60. 06:15 PM - Re: KAWO - Arlington (Winston Ellis)
61. 06:34 PM - Re: Header tank (Jeff Small)
62. 06:58 PM - Re: Header tank (ZodiacBuilder@aol.com)
63. 07:29 PM - Re: 601HD Joy Stick (CBRxxDRV@aol.com)
64. 07:53 PM - Re: Header tank (Michel Therrien)
65. 08:02 PM - Re: KAWO - Arlington (Scott Laughlin)
66. 08:38 PM - Re: KAWO - Arlington (Ray Montagne)
67. 10:40 PM - Re: Header tank (Gary Gower)
68. 10:47 PM - Re: Header tank (Gary Gower)
69. 11:11 PM - Re: Header tank (Gary Gower)
70. 11:29 PM - Re: Header tank (Murphy's law?) (Gary Gower)
Message 1
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Manual for 701SP |
06/23/2003 09:59:20 AM
--> Zenith-List message posted by: Jari.Kaija@pkcgroup.com
Has anyone a good operators manual or manual template for CH701SP to share?
And if so, I'd like to get link to it. Zenair's example (what I have)
seems to be
only for previous version of 701.
-Jari / CH701SP, OH-XJJ
jari.kaija@pp.inet.fi
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | 912S Hard Starting |
--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Phil & Michele Miller" <millerpg@ps.gen.nz>
Hi, Dave,
912 & 912S engines run at 26 deg BTDC. At less than 1000rpm they fire at
4 deg BTDC. The switching is carried out by the electronic modules. We
were absolutely convinced the problem had to be caused by incorrect
timing but have checked the pulse at all 8 spark plugs at cranking speed
and they all fire at 4 degrees. These engines idle well above 1000rpm so
timing at idle should be 26 degrees.
There is no way to adjust the timing but a very clever friend made up
two offset brackets to retard one pair of the trigger coils. We fitted
them then tried starting on one mag and it fired up almost immediately;
when we shut down and tried again it was back to the old kicking and
bucking and wouldn't start. Not really sure what it proved but it
prompted us to check the timing on all 8 plugs as described above.
Fuel pressure on cranking and zero flow is 4.9psi on the standard Rotax
mechanical pump.
Prop is a 3-blade Warp Drive which I believe is the one recommended by
ZAC.
Cheers,
Phil M
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-zenith-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-zenith-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Dave Austin
Subject: Re: Zenith-List: 912S Hard Starting
--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Dave Austin" <daveaustin2@sprint.ca>
Just one more time, Phil,
After all the checks you have done, the kickback and violent rocking you
describe surely can only be that the ignition is firing too soon before
TDC. I've never enquired of Rotax whether their ignition modules include
a retard function at low or starting rpm. If they do, that could be
failing. If not, I would try retarding the ignition up to five degrees.
I don't recall you mentioning a timing check under idling condition. The
flooding would almost certainly be the shaking disturbing the needle
valves. Which raises one more question.. what fuel pressure are you
seeing when you do these cold start attempts? No more than 4
lbs/sq.in.? I prime with the electric pump, then turn it off. We've
had builders here install incorrect higher pressure pumps, which has
caused all sorts of problems. Are you using an unusually heavy prop, or
a very flexible one which is causing the crankshaft to "pulse"? Bit of a
pig getting to the stage you are and putting the money down. Dave Austin
601HDS - 912
direct advertising on the Matronics Forums.
Message 3
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Mitchell Instruments... |
--> Zenith-List message posted by: RoyN9869L@aol.com
Hi Don,
You didn't say if you had a mounting cluster for those instruments. The
cluster is bought separately, see 2002/2003 ACS catalog page 353, See in fine
print mid page for your situation, Cheers
Regards,
Roger Roy
CH-701
Message 4
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Zenith-List message posted by: CBRxxDRV@aol.com
I have always thought I would like to do away with the "Y" stick
on the 601 and since I ordered my RAC grip have been thinking
of starting on this. Any pointers, ideas or guidence? Length or
angle. I was looking at it yesterday and thought I needed to
keep the same angle rearward as the "Y"stick.
TIA
Sal Capra
Lakeland, FL
<A HREF="http://hometown.aol.com/cbrxxdrv/index.html">My Home Page
http://hometown.aol.com/cbrxxdrv/index.html
Message 5
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Flight Service Station |
--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Dave Alberti" <daberti@execpc.com>
It was 9815L
Do not archive
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-zenith-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-zenith-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Gary Gower
Subject: Re: Zenith-List: Flight Service Station
--> Zenith-List message posted by: Gary Gower <ggower_99@yahoo.com>
This is the data from Landings of the plane involved in the emergency
on the tape:
N-number : N95L
Aircraft Serial Number : 15383
Aircraft Manufacturer : CESSNA
Model : 140A
Engine Manufacturer : CONT MOTOR
Message 6
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Mitchell Instruments... |
--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Don Honabach" <don@pcperfect.com>
Roger,
Thanks for the reply!
I've only got 2 of the instruments and the smallest cluster mount is 4.
It also just seems weird that there isn't any flange on these guys. If
they had a 2 cluster mount, I'd probably pick it up and deal with the
flange issue, but since I have to custom make one, I was curios as to
what others have done.
Thanks!
Don
-----Original Message-----
From: RoyN9869L@aol.com [mailto:RoyN9869L@aol.com]
Subject: Re: Zenith-List: Mitchell Instruments...
--> Zenith-List message posted by: RoyN9869L@aol.com
Hi Don,
You didn't say if you had a mounting cluster for those instruments.
The
cluster is bought separately, see 2002/2003 ACS catalog page 353, See in
fine
print mid page for your situation, Cheers
Regards,
Roger Roy
CH-701
direct advertising on the Matronics Forums.
Message 7
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Don Honabach" <don@pcperfect.com>
>> I have always thought I would like to do away with the "Y" stick on
the 601
I'm just at the phase where I can sit in my plane and make noises
(hopefully no one has a video camera near by) and do make-believe radio
calls (to test my N# and practice the lost skill of flying/comm work).
Any way, the Y stick actually seems to fit just about perfect. I didn't
like it at first and thought it was going to get in the way, but when
seated, it seems literally just about as perfect as you can get. Did you
want to get rid of the co-pilot part of the Y or just got with a basic
straight up and down type stick?
Regards,
Don
-----Original Message-----
From: CBRxxDRV@aol.com [mailto:CBRxxDRV@aol.com]
Subject: Zenith-List: 601HD Joy Stick
--> Zenith-List message posted by: CBRxxDRV@aol.com
I have always thought I would like to do away with the "Y" stick on the
601 and since I ordered my RAC grip have been thinking of starting on
this. Any pointers, ideas or guidence? Length or angle. I was looking at
it yesterday and thought I needed to
keep the same angle rearward as the "Y"stick.
TIA
Sal Capra
Lakeland, FL
<A HREF="http://hometown.aol.com/cbrxxdrv/index.html">My Home Page
http://hometown.aol.com/cbrxxdrv/index.html
direct advertising on the Matronics Forums.
Message 8
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: 601HD Joy Stick |
Seal-Send-Time: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 09:55:25 -0500
--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Don Walker" <dwalk3dw@msn.com>
I contemplated the same thing because it felt foreign to me, but I didn't want
to do any more than necessary before getting airborne back in '99, so I left it.
When I began taxi testing, the difference disappeared immediately. Now I am
very glad I left it. I really enjoy allowing a passenger to be lightly on the
stick with me, to get the feel for the motion (or lack of it). The y makes that
natural. It also fits the arm and wrist well while using the armrest. Don
----- Original Message -----
From: Don Honabach
To: zenith-list@matronics.com
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 9:19 AM
Subject: RE: Zenith-List: 601HD Joy Stick
--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Don Honabach" <don@pcperfect.com>
>> I have always thought I would like to do away with the "Y" stick on
the 601
I'm just at the phase where I can sit in my plane and make noises
(hopefully no one has a video camera near by) and do make-believe radio
calls (to test my N# and practice the lost skill of flying/comm work).
Any way, the Y stick actually seems to fit just about perfect. I didn't
like it at first and thought it was going to get in the way, but when
seated, it seems literally just about as perfect as you can get. Did you
want to get rid of the co-pilot part of the Y or just got with a basic
straight up and down type stick?
Regards,
Don
-----Original Message-----
From: CBRxxDRV@aol.com [mailto:CBRxxDRV@aol.com]
To: zenith-list@matronics.com
Subject: Zenith-List: 601HD Joy Stick
--> Zenith-List message posted by: CBRxxDRV@aol.com
I have always thought I would like to do away with the "Y" stick on the
601 and since I ordered my RAC grip have been thinking of starting on
this. Any pointers, ideas or guidence? Length or angle. I was looking at
it yesterday and thought I needed to
keep the same angle rearward as the "Y"stick.
TIA
Sal Capra
Lakeland, FL
<A HREF"http://hometown.aol.com/cbrxxdrv/index.html">My Home Page
http://hometown.aol.com/cbrxxdrv/index.html
direct advertising on the Matronics Forums.
Message 9
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Rockin Rim Ranch, Inc." <dave@rockinrimranch.com>
I was wondering if anyone has had concerns about the 16-gallon header tank behind
the instrument panel. Would it be better to eliminate this tank, and install
tanks in both wing lockers instead? Is the header tank a safe system?
Tanks for the comments.....Dave
Message 10
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: 601HD Joy Stick |
--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Paul Sharpe" <fly601@rogers.com>
----- Original Message -----
Subject: RE: Zenith-List: 601HD Joy Stick
I wouldn't recommend doing away with the "Y" stick. I thought it looked
strange too at first, but now that I'm flying with it I really like it. It
places your arm and wrist at a very comfortable position. Remember too that
the 601 is very light on the controls; you plant your elbow on the armrest
and really only need to use your fingertips on the stick.
Paul Sharpe
C-IABP / CH601HD
Message 11
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Zenith-List message posted by: ZodiacBuilder@aol.com
In a message dated 6/23/2003 11:53:49 AM Eastern Standard Time,
dave@rockinrimranch.com writes:
> I was wondering if anyone has had concerns about the 16-gallon header tank
> behind the instrument panel. Would it be better to eliminate this tank, and
> install tanks in both wing lockers instead? Is the header tank a safe system?
>
> Tanks for the comments.....Dave
>
>
Nope..........!!!!!!
John W. Tarabocchia
http://www.hometown.aol.com/zodiacbuilder/
N6042T 100hrs. flown
Message 12
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Paul Sharpe" <fly601@rogers.com>
----- Original Message -----
Subject: Zenith-List: Header tank
> I was wondering if anyone has had concerns about the 16-gallon header tank
behind the instrument panel. Would it be better to eliminate this tank, and
install tanks in both wing lockers instead? Is the header tank a safe
system?
I had concerns before building my 601 because of some nasty accidents
several years ago, so I opted for a leading edge tank in each wing, each
with it's own Facet fuel pump, and no header tank. I'm glad I did, and
would do it again if I built another 601.
Paul Sharpe
C-IABP / CH601HD
Message 13
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Mark A. Wood" <Mark.Wood@uvm.edu>
Depends on who you ask.
The header will let you fly when your fuel pump stops. GOOD
It will also be a fire issue in case of a crash. BAD
I have the 8 gal header with wing tanks and like that.
Mark Wood
>--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Rockin Rim Ranch, Inc."
><dave@rockinrimranch.com>
>
>I was wondering if anyone has had concerns about the 16-gallon
>header tank behind the instrument panel. Would it be better to
>eliminate this tank, and install tanks in both wing lockers instead?
>Is the header tank a safe system?
>
>Tanks for the comments.....Dave
>
--
Mark Wood
Assistive Technology Consultant, VT I-Team
Center on Disability and Community Inclusion
University of Vermont
Message 14
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Get scientific was Too many Zodiacs down! |
--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Garrou, Douglas" <dgarrou@hunton.com>
I agree it is a bold statement, but it was boldly borne of my (perhaps
unique) aversion to engine-out landings. Although I would be the first to
admit I am no hotshot stick and rudder man, my flying skills are a separate
question. I think I probably *could* get it down on the salt flats on a
clear day with a BRS and a gun to my head, my point is that don't want to
find out the answer to that question if I can avoid it! :)
The certified manufacturers definitely have had some serious quality control
problems. And when that happens, the ramifications are also likely to be
MUCH more severe than problems with an aftermarket auto conversion, simply
because there are LOTS more certified engines out there (especially, on a
percentage basis, in larger piston-engined passenger planes, all of which
probably use certified engines).
But if the Lycoming crankshaft problem has cost people their lives, the flip
side is that the regulatory regime then *prevented* further injuries,
crashes, or deaths by grounding the fleet. Would a similar review of, say,
recent auto conversion failures result in a grounding of THAT engine,
preventing a FUTURE accident? We'll never know. Would one of these recent
601 crashes -- where injury was averted by skill AND likely by a bit of luck
-- have been prevented if the regulators and their ADs had been on the scene
from the get-go? We'll never know.
Our information about aftermarket auto conversions is completely anecdotal
unless and until their manufacturers choose to put equivalent quality
control and tracking programs in place. And what I was saying in my
admittedly hyperbolic way is that the anecdotal evidence I have seen here is
worrisome to me.
I absolutely appreciate that other people see it differently, and that they
approach the issue from valid and different perspectives on risk, cost, etc.
Put another way, I do not think other people are crazy for flying behind
auto engines -- I only think it would be crazy for ME to do so, since I am
an admitted flying chicken.
Doug
p.s. No offense taken on the Doud thing. :)
-----Original Message-----
That is quite a bold statement to make. If you could not land safely within
the parameters you quote above you might want to rethink your flying skills.
Surely you heard about the Lycoming fiasco last year and this in which the
FAA
Message 15
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Rockin Rim Ranch, Inc." <dave@rockinrimranch.com>
Thanks Mark. I was planning on installing a Facet fuel pump in series or
parallel as a backup. How is your system set up? Do you feed your header
tank by pumping fuel ito it from the wing tanks? Or do all tanks feed the
gascolator through a fuel selector switch?
Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark A. Wood" <Mark.Wood@uvm.edu>
Subject: Re: Zenith-List: Header tank
> --> Zenith-List message posted by: "Mark A. Wood" <Mark.Wood@uvm.edu>
>
> Depends on who you ask.
> The header will let you fly when your fuel pump stops. GOOD
> It will also be a fire issue in case of a crash. BAD
> I have the 8 gal header with wing tanks and like that.
>
> Mark Wood
>
>
> >--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Rockin Rim Ranch, Inc."
> ><dave@rockinrimranch.com>
> >
> >I was wondering if anyone has had concerns about the 16-gallon
> >header tank behind the instrument panel. Would it be better to
> >eliminate this tank, and install tanks in both wing lockers instead?
> >Is the header tank a safe system?
> >
> >Tanks for the comments.....Dave
> >
>
> --
> Mark Wood
> Assistive Technology Consultant, VT I-Team
> Center on Disability and Community Inclusion
> University of Vermont
>
>
Message 16
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Rockin Rim Ranch, Inc." <dave@rockinrimranch.com>
That was short and sweet, John. Thanks...Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: <ZodiacBuilder@aol.com>
Subject: Re: Zenith-List: Header tank
> --> Zenith-List message posted by: ZodiacBuilder@aol.com
>
> In a message dated 6/23/2003 11:53:49 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> dave@rockinrimranch.com writes:
>
>
> > I was wondering if anyone has had concerns about the 16-gallon header
tank
> > behind the instrument panel. Would it be better to eliminate this tank,
and
> > install tanks in both wing lockers instead? Is the header tank a safe
system?
> >
> > Tanks for the comments.....Dave
> >
> >
>
> Nope..........!!!!!!
> John W. Tarabocchia
> http://www.hometown.aol.com/zodiacbuilder/
>
> N6042T 100hrs. flown
>
>
Message 17
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Rockin Rim Ranch, Inc." <dave@rockinrimranch.com>
Thanks Paul. Seems there are lots of opinions on this.
Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Sharpe" <fly601@rogers.com>
Subject: Re: Zenith-List: Header tank
> --> Zenith-List message posted by: "Paul Sharpe" <fly601@rogers.com>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> Subject: Zenith-List: Header tank
>
>
> > I was wondering if anyone has had concerns about the 16-gallon header
tank
> behind the instrument panel. Would it be better to eliminate this tank,
and
> install tanks in both wing lockers instead? Is the header tank a safe
> system?
>
>
> I had concerns before building my 601 because of some nasty accidents
> several years ago, so I opted for a leading edge tank in each wing, each
> with it's own Facet fuel pump, and no header tank. I'm glad I did, and
> would do it again if I built another 601.
>
> Paul Sharpe
> C-IABP / CH601HD
>
>
Message 18
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | extra storage behind seat |
--> Zenith-List message posted by: CLOJAN@aol.com
After building the seat structure on my XL I find that there is quite a bit
of room behind the passenger seat under the luggage shelf. ( The pilot side has
the flap motor.) I was wondering if anyone thought about building a "trunk"
in this area to keep the small stuff concealed that you don't want in public
view? It looks like the back cushion would fold forward for access to this
compartment. Thanks
Jack Russell Clovis,CA
#5000 XL
Message 19
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Mark A. Wood" <Mark.Wood@uvm.edu>
Dave
I have a shut off on the line from each tank as it comes in from the
wing tank (these will both stay open in normal use). They T into a
single Facet fuel pump which pumps to the header. From the header I
have a overflow / return line which returns to my right wing tank.
Also from the header it is gravity feed to the gascolator and then
the Aero-Carb carburetor by Sonex. This carburetor uses very low fuel
pressure, but I would assume that the standard carb on my O-200 would
also work gravity feed on this system.
This is not yet a tested system. I hope to have the air duct work in
my cowl done in the next two weeks and will then be ready to fire it
up for the first time, and give it a test.
Mark
>--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Rockin Rim Ranch, Inc."
><dave@rockinrimranch.com>
>
>Thanks Mark. I was planning on installing a Facet fuel pump in series or
>parallel as a backup. How is your system set up? Do you feed your header
>tank by pumping fuel ito it from the wing tanks? Or do all tanks feed the
>gascolator through a fuel selector switch?
>
>Dave
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Mark A. Wood" <Mark.Wood@uvm.edu>
>To: <zenith-list@matronics.com>
>Subject: Re: Zenith-List: Header tank
>
--
Mark Wood
Assistive Technology Consultant, VT I-Team
Center on Disability and Community Inclusion
University of Vermont
Message 20
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: 601HD Joy Stick |
--> Zenith-List message posted by: CBRxxDRV@aol.com
In a message dated 6/23/03 10:19:58 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
don@pcperfect.com writes:
> Did you
> want to get rid of the co-pilot part of the Y or just got with a basic
> straight up and down type stick?
>
I was going to put the G205 RAC grip on it with the elevator and
aileron trim on the stick. I can do it with the Y as I have seen
it done, but I though I would like the single stick.
Sal Capra
Lakeland, FL
<A HREF="http://hometown.aol.com/cbrxxdrv/index.html">My Home Page
http://hometown.aol.com/cbrxxdrv/index.html
Message 21
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Rockin Rim Ranch, Inc." <dave@rockinrimranch.com>
Thanks for the info, Mark. Sounds like your system works fairly well.
Incidently, do you know why ZAC requires cork between the metal header tank
and the fuselage? I thought all metal parts had to be grounded, including
the fuel tank. When refueling, do you connect the grounding line from the
FBO fuel pump to the headr tank, or to the aircraft itself?
Thanks....Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark A. Wood" <Mark.Wood@uvm.edu>
Subject: Re: Zenith-List: Header tank
> --> Zenith-List message posted by: "Mark A. Wood" <Mark.Wood@uvm.edu>
>
> Dave
>
> I have a shut off on the line from each tank as it comes in from the
> wing tank (these will both stay open in normal use). They T into a
> single Facet fuel pump which pumps to the header. From the header I
> have a overflow / return line which returns to my right wing tank.
> Also from the header it is gravity feed to the gascolator and then
> the Aero-Carb carburetor by Sonex. This carburetor uses very low fuel
> pressure, but I would assume that the standard carb on my O-200 would
> also work gravity feed on this system.
>
> This is not yet a tested system. I hope to have the air duct work in
> my cowl done in the next two weeks and will then be ready to fire it
> up for the first time, and give it a test.
>
> Mark
>
>
> >--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Rockin Rim Ranch, Inc."
> ><dave@rockinrimranch.com>
> >
> >Thanks Mark. I was planning on installing a Facet fuel pump in series or
> >parallel as a backup. How is your system set up? Do you feed your header
> >tank by pumping fuel ito it from the wing tanks? Or do all tanks feed the
> >gascolator through a fuel selector switch?
> >
> >Dave
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Mark A. Wood" <Mark.Wood@uvm.edu>
> >To: <zenith-list@matronics.com>
> >Subject: Re: Zenith-List: Header tank
> >
>
> --
> Mark Wood
> Assistive Technology Consultant, VT I-Team
> Center on Disability and Community Inclusion
> University of Vermont
>
>
Message 22
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: XL extra storage behind seat |
--> Zenith-List message posted by: wizard-24@juno.com
> room behind the passenger seat under the luggage shelf.
I've thought about that too. I'm thinking that maybe it'll be useful
space to store part of a collapsible bike or scooter that I can sue when
I land somewhere. I plan to wait until I can do a weight and balance on
the completed plane to see if that is even a possibility.
Mike Fortunato
601XL
Attaching flaps
The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
Message 23
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Mitchell Instruments... |
--> Zenith-List message posted by: RoyN9869L@aol.com
Don,
I installed a 5 cluster Mitchell system in my Grumman and the cluster had
mounting tabs. In the spruce catalog on the paragraph that I mentioned it
addresses the one or two gage installation. You can call Mitchell at (847)615-2887
and speak with Bob, he is one of the product engineers
RR
Message 24
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Zenith-List message posted by: Ray Montagne <ac6qj@earthlink.net>
On 6/23/03 12:33 PM, "Rockin Rim Ranch, Inc." <dave@rockinrimranch.com>
wrote:
> --> Zenith-List message posted by: "Rockin Rim Ranch, Inc."
> <dave@rockinrimranch.com>
>
> Incidently, do you know why ZAC requires cork between the metal header tank
> and the fuselage? I thought all metal parts had to be grounded, including
> the fuel tank. When refueling, do you connect the grounding line from the
> FBO fuel pump to the headr tank, or to the aircraft itself?
>
Cork is also used on the wing tanks on the XL. The tanks include a tab to
connect a grounding wire.
Best Regards, Ray Montagne
EAA: 697920
AOPA: 039409692
===========================================================================
Zenith Aircraft Zodiac CH-601-XL builder #4939, Jabiru 3300
Construction Log & Photos: <http://home.earthlink.net/~ac6qj/zodiac>
Build Status: Rudder completed
Elevator Completed
Stabilizer Completed
Flaps Completed
Ailerons Completed
Right Wing Under Completed
Right Wing Tip Under Construction
===========================================================================
Message 25
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Bill Steer" <bsteer@gwi.net>
Same thing goes for the HD.
Bill
> Cork is also used on the wing tanks on the XL. The tanks include a tab to
> connect a grounding wire.
Message 26
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Zenith-List message posted by: Flydog1966@aol.com
well group, I have used 3-m trimite wet or dry sand paper when removing
scratches from my wing spars and such, only to learn today that it is made of
silicon carbide. AC43.13-1b has a chart that says not to use it on alum alloys!
Can anyone tell me why, or if it is any real concearn?
Thanks
Phil
Message 27
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: silicon carbide |
--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Fred or Sandy Hulen" <hulens61@birch.net>
Zenith published a whole page in one of there back issues of the news letter
on "acceptable" and "unacceptable" abrasive materials to use on aluminum
construction. According to their list, "silicon" is "acceptable", while the
abrasives with ferrous oxide (iron particles) are not. It was explained to
me that if we sand or scrub aluminum with iron particle based abrasives or
wire brushes, etc, that it is likely that we will embed iron oxide into the
surface of the aluminum which sets up a galvanic ion exchange (corrosion).
Don't get excited, we're talking about "micro corrosion" here. There are
surely many many aluminum aircraft flying around that were unknowingly
sanded with iron oxide abrasives, and we don't here about the paint popping
off all over them, which would be the case if the oxide were a significant
problem. I'd suggest you stick with the "acceptable materials list" from
here on out. I think you can find that chart in the archives under the
discussion of corrosion.
I took my youngest grandson up last week (he's 8 years old) an he had a very
interesting observation looking down at all the houses and cars in
miniature. "Looks like a train set down there Grandpa"....
Fred 47.5 hours on Jabiru 3300 powered 601 HDS 601LX
Message 28
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: silicon carbide |
--> Zenith-List message posted by: Flydog1966@aol.com
Thanks for the reply about abrasives. But is the "carbide" an "iron oxide"?
I'm guessing its some form of carbon. I cant figure out how to work those
archives but I'll check the old newsletters for that chart.
Thanks again
Phil
Message 29
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Rockin Rim Ranch, Inc." <dave@rockinrimranch.com>
Ray,
Question is.......if you're going to ground the tank with a wire, why does
the tank have to be separated from the fuselage with cork? Wouldn't the tank
touching the fuselage be a good ground?
Thanks...Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ray Montagne" <ac6qj@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Zenith-List: Header tank
> --> Zenith-List message posted by: Ray Montagne <ac6qj@earthlink.net>
>
> On 6/23/03 12:33 PM, "Rockin Rim Ranch, Inc." <dave@rockinrimranch.com>
> wrote:
>
> > --> Zenith-List message posted by: "Rockin Rim Ranch, Inc."
> > <dave@rockinrimranch.com>
> >
> > Incidently, do you know why ZAC requires cork between the metal header
tank
> > and the fuselage? I thought all metal parts had to be grounded,
including
> > the fuel tank. When refueling, do you connect the grounding line from
the
> > FBO fuel pump to the headr tank, or to the aircraft itself?
> >
>
> Cork is also used on the wing tanks on the XL. The tanks include a tab to
> connect a grounding wire.
>
>
> Best Regards, Ray Montagne
> EAA: 697920
> AOPA: 039409692
>
>
===========================================================================
>
> Zenith Aircraft Zodiac CH-601-XL builder #4939, Jabiru 3300
> Construction Log & Photos: <http://home.earthlink.net/~ac6qj/zodiac>
> Build Status: Rudder completed
> Elevator Completed
> Stabilizer Completed
> Flaps Completed
> Ailerons Completed
> Right Wing Under Completed
> Right Wing Tip Under Construction
>
>
===========================================================================
>
>
Message 30
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Zenith-List message posted by: Ray Montagne <ac6qj@earthlink.net>
> Ray,
>
> Question is.......if you're going to ground the tank with a wire, why does
> the tank have to be separated from the fuselage with cork? Wouldn't the tank
> touching the fuselage be a good ground?
>
I wouldn't think that relying on mechanical contact would be a reliable form
of grounding. Acceleration forces encountered during flight might lead to
making and breaking the ground connection. The cork provides some padding
that allows a tighter fit to prevent the tank from moving around (it is
essentially a press fit and is not bolted in). It also prevents any
movement of the tank from wearing on the components that it comes in contact
with. The wire bonding will never break the ground path.
DO NOT ARCHIVE
Best Regards, Ray Montagne
===========================================================================
Zenith Aircraft Zodiac CH-601-XL builder #4939, Jabiru 3300
Construction Log & Photos: <http://home.earthlink.net/~ac6qj/zodiac>
Build Status: Rudder completed
Elevator Completed
Stabilizer Completed
Flaps Completed
Ailerons Completed
Right Wing Under Completed
Right Wing Tip Under Construction
===========================================================================
Message 31
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Mitchell Instruments... |
--> Zenith-List message posted by: Grant Corriveau <grantc@ca.inter.net>
> From: "Don Honabach" <don@pcperfect.com>
but since I have to custom make one, I was curios as to
> what others have done.
I installed the Mitchell fuel pressure gauge - maybe it's similar. It also
had no flange, but as I recall there's a back-plate and a securing screw.
I used L-angles to make a little 'tray'/mounting well that the gauge slides
into and is secured at the back with the screw -- at least that's what I
recall. Don't have my aircraft nearby to check or take photo.
--
Grant Corriveau
C-GHTF / HDS / CAM100
Message 32
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | KAWO - Arlington |
--> Zenith-List message posted by: Ray Montagne <ac6qj@earthlink.net>
Any XL's headed to Arlington, WA? I'll be there, albeit in a Cessna. Would
like to talk to other builders and see some completed aircraft.
DO NOT ARCHIVE
Best Regards, Ray Montagne
Cupertino, CA
===========================================================================
Zenith Aircraft Zodiac CH-601-XL, Jabiru 3300
Construction Log & Photos: <http://home.earthlink.net/~ac6qj/zodiac>
Build Status: Rudder completed
Elevator Completed
Stabilizer Completed
Flaps Completed
Ailerons Completed
Right Wing Under Completed
Right Wing Tip Under Construction
===========================================================================
Message 33
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Dave Alberti" <daberti@execpc.com>
Yes, right up to the moment that the vibration induced friction wears a hole
through the tank!. The cork is an anti chafing mechanism.
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-zenith-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-zenith-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Rockin Rim
Ranch, Inc.
Subject: Re: Zenith-List: Header tank
--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Rockin Rim Ranch, Inc."
<dave@rockinrimranch.com>
Ray,
Question is.......if you're going to ground the tank with a wire, why does
the tank have to be separated from the fuselage with cork? Wouldn't the tank
touching the fuselage be a good ground?
Thanks...Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ray Montagne" <ac6qj@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Zenith-List: Header tank
> --> Zenith-List message posted by: Ray Montagne <ac6qj@earthlink.net>
>
> On 6/23/03 12:33 PM, "Rockin Rim Ranch, Inc." <dave@rockinrimranch.com>
> wrote:
>
> > --> Zenith-List message posted by: "Rockin Rim Ranch, Inc."
> > <dave@rockinrimranch.com>
> >
> > Incidently, do you know why ZAC requires cork between the metal header
tank
> > and the fuselage? I thought all metal parts had to be grounded,
including
> > the fuel tank. When refueling, do you connect the grounding line from
the
> > FBO fuel pump to the headr tank, or to the aircraft itself?
> >
>
> Cork is also used on the wing tanks on the XL. The tanks include a tab to
> connect a grounding wire.
>
>
> Best Regards, Ray Montagne
> EAA: 697920
> AOPA: 039409692
>
>
===========================================================================
>
> Zenith Aircraft Zodiac CH-601-XL builder #4939, Jabiru 3300
> Construction Log & Photos: <http://home.earthlink.net/~ac6qj/zodiac>
> Build Status: Rudder completed
> Elevator Completed
> Stabilizer Completed
> Flaps Completed
> Ailerons Completed
> Right Wing Under Completed
> Right Wing Tip Under Construction
>
>
===========================================================================
>
>
Message 34
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: 601HD Joy Stick |
--> Zenith-List message posted by: Grant Corriveau <grantc@ca.inter.net>
> I have always thought I would like to do away with the "Y" stick
> on the 601 and since I ordered my RAC grip have been thinking
> of starting on this. Any pointers, ideas or guidence? Length or
> angle. I was looking at it yesterday and thought I needed to
> keep the same angle rearward as the "Y"stick.
>
> TIA
I chopped the pax side of the 'Y' off before first flight - not planning any
dual training and the Y interferes with my access across the panel/lower
sidewall on the right.
I still don't care for the pilot side of the Y as it tends to get in the way
of my inboard knew - but I am long-legged. I am seriously contemplating one
more 'chop' to remove the Y altogether and install a wooden grip with 1
pitch-trim 'cap' switch.
I don't care for the MAC grip with the small trim buttons - they are not
intuitive; not easy to find with the finger tips without accidently
trimming; and one of the aileron buttons tends to come to rest against my
kneecap when I'm not noticing it ... i.e. Hey? why is the aircraft
banking???? ;-)
--
Grant Corriveau
C-GHTF / HDS / CAM100
Message 35
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: silicon carbide |
--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Fred or Sandy Hulen" <hulens61@birch.net>
> Thanks for the reply about abrasives. But is the "carbide" an "iron
oxide"?
++ Not sure. I did a very quick search in the archives and found several
comments referring to the list that Zenith posted, but didn't find the
entire list. Emery cloth, wire brushes made of steel, and ferrous oxide
abrasives were mentioned as being "prohibited". I did find a reference to
the issue that it was printed in, that being issue # 84, October of 1994.
That date sounds too old as I began my aircraft in 1997 and the list showed
up in one of my newsletter issues after that.
Maybe one of the guys out there is good at looking things up..........
Fred
Message 36
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: extra storage behind seat |
--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Larry McFarland" <larrymc@qconline.com>
Subject: Zenith-List: extra storage behind seat
> --> Zenith-List message posted by: CLOJAN@aol.com
>
> After building the seat structure on my XL I find that there is quite a
bit
> of room behind the passenger seat under the luggage shelf. ( The pilot
side has
> the flap motor.) I was wondering if anyone thought about building a
"trunk"
> in this area to keep the small stuff concealed that you don't want in
public
> view? It looks like the back cushion would fold forward for access to this
> compartment. Thanks
> Jack Russell Clovis,CA
> #5000 XL
Jack,
I'm building a 601hds and found adding a stowage area behind each seat a
very
worth while effort. I framed the periphery of each side between the rear
spar, sides and center and added a
hinged rear bottom that allows access for cable adjustments etc. and
clearances for batteries that are just behind the rear spar on the right
side.
Images can be found on the website. www.macsmachine.com Large
assembly/fuselage to wing.
Larry McFarland
Message 37
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Get scientific was Too many Zodiacs down! |
--> Zenith-List message posted by: Benford2@aol.com
In a message dated 6/23/2003 11:41:16 AM Mountain Daylight Time,
dgarrou@hunton.com writes:
>
> Doug
>
> p.s. No offense taken on the Doud thing. :)
>
>
Peace...And on our first meeting I will buy the first few rounds of adult
beverages.
Ben Haas. N801BH.
Message 38
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Rockin Rim Ranch, Inc." <dave@rockinrimranch.com>
Aha! I knew there had to be a good reason....I'm a new bilder with lots to
learn.
Thanks...Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Alberti" <daberti@execpc.com>
Subject: RE: Zenith-List: Header tank
> --> Zenith-List message posted by: "Dave Alberti" <daberti@execpc.com>
>
> Yes, right up to the moment that the vibration induced friction wears a
hole
> through the tank!. The cork is an anti chafing mechanism.
> Dave
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-zenith-list-server@matronics.com
> [mailto:owner-zenith-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of Rockin Rim
> Ranch, Inc.
> To: zenith-list@matronics.com
> Subject: Re: Zenith-List: Header tank
>
> --> Zenith-List message posted by: "Rockin Rim Ranch, Inc."
> <dave@rockinrimranch.com>
>
> Ray,
>
> Question is.......if you're going to ground the tank with a wire, why does
> the tank have to be separated from the fuselage with cork? Wouldn't the
tank
> touching the fuselage be a good ground?
>
> Thanks...Dave
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ray Montagne" <ac6qj@earthlink.net>
> To: "Zenith List" <zenith-list@matronics.com>
> Subject: Re: Zenith-List: Header tank
>
>
> > --> Zenith-List message posted by: Ray Montagne <ac6qj@earthlink.net>
> >
> > On 6/23/03 12:33 PM, "Rockin Rim Ranch, Inc." <dave@rockinrimranch.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > --> Zenith-List message posted by: "Rockin Rim Ranch, Inc."
> > > <dave@rockinrimranch.com>
> > >
> > > Incidently, do you know why ZAC requires cork between the metal header
> tank
> > > and the fuselage? I thought all metal parts had to be grounded,
> including
> > > the fuel tank. When refueling, do you connect the grounding line from
> the
> > > FBO fuel pump to the headr tank, or to the aircraft itself?
> > >
> >
> > Cork is also used on the wing tanks on the XL. The tanks include a tab
to
> > connect a grounding wire.
> >
> >
> > Best Regards, Ray Montagne
> > EAA: 697920
> > AOPA: 039409692
> >
> >
>
===========================================================================
> >
> > Zenith Aircraft Zodiac CH-601-XL builder #4939, Jabiru 3300
> > Construction Log & Photos: <http://home.earthlink.net/~ac6qj/zodiac>
> > Build Status: Rudder completed
> > Elevator Completed
> > Stabilizer Completed
> > Flaps Completed
> > Ailerons Completed
> > Right Wing Under Completed
> > Right Wing Tip Under Construction
> >
> >
>
===========================================================================
> >
> >
>
>
Message 39
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Rockin Rim Ranch, Inc." <dave@rockinrimranch.com>
Thanks Ray. I'll be needing lots of help in the coming year since I'm a new
builder.
Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ray Montagne" <ac6qj@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Zenith-List: Header tank
> --> Zenith-List message posted by: Ray Montagne <ac6qj@earthlink.net>
>
> > Ray,
> >
> > Question is.......if you're going to ground the tank with a wire, why
does
> > the tank have to be separated from the fuselage with cork? Wouldn't the
tank
> > touching the fuselage be a good ground?
> >
>
> I wouldn't think that relying on mechanical contact would be a reliable
form
> of grounding. Acceleration forces encountered during flight might lead to
> making and breaking the ground connection. The cork provides some padding
> that allows a tighter fit to prevent the tank from moving around (it is
> essentially a press fit and is not bolted in). It also prevents any
> movement of the tank from wearing on the components that it comes in
contact
> with. The wire bonding will never break the ground path.
>
> DO NOT ARCHIVE
>
> Best Regards, Ray Montagne
>
>
===========================================================================
>
> Zenith Aircraft Zodiac CH-601-XL builder #4939, Jabiru 3300
> Construction Log & Photos: <http://home.earthlink.net/~ac6qj/zodiac>
> Build Status: Rudder completed
> Elevator Completed
> Stabilizer Completed
> Flaps Completed
> Ailerons Completed
> Right Wing Under Completed
> Right Wing Tip Under Construction
>
>
===========================================================================
>
>
Message 40
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: KAWO - Arlington |
--> Zenith-List message posted by: Frank Stutzman <stutzman@stutzman.com>
On Mon, 23 Jun 2003, Ray Montagne wrote:
> --> Zenith-List message posted by: Ray Montagne <ac6qj@earthlink.net>
>
> Any XL's headed to Arlington, WA? I'll be there, albeit in a Cessna. Would
> like to talk to other builders and see some completed aircraft.
Indeed, I'm in the same situation, although I am more interested in 701's
and I'll be showing up in a Beech.
DO NOT ARCHIVE
Frank Stutzman
Bonanza N494B "Hula Girl"
Hood River, OR
Message 41
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: 601HD Joy Stick |
--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Rockin Rim Ranch, Inc." <dave@rockinrimranch.com>
Is there any reason you can't just cut off the "Y" completely, and have a
sidestick, which is used on the Airbus? Seems as if control would be better
with the pilot's arm on the armrest holding the stick. Just a thought.
Dave
601HD
----- Original Message -----
From: "Grant Corriveau" <grantc@ca.inter.net>
Subject: Re: Zenith-List: 601HD Joy Stick
> --> Zenith-List message posted by: Grant Corriveau <grantc@ca.inter.net>
>
> > I have always thought I would like to do away with the "Y" stick
> > on the 601 and since I ordered my RAC grip have been thinking
> > of starting on this. Any pointers, ideas or guidence? Length or
> > angle. I was looking at it yesterday and thought I needed to
> > keep the same angle rearward as the "Y"stick.
> >
> > TIA
>
> I chopped the pax side of the 'Y' off before first flight - not planning
any
> dual training and the Y interferes with my access across the panel/lower
> sidewall on the right.
>
> I still don't care for the pilot side of the Y as it tends to get in the
way
> of my inboard knew - but I am long-legged. I am seriously contemplating
one
> more 'chop' to remove the Y altogether and install a wooden grip with 1
> pitch-trim 'cap' switch.
>
> I don't care for the MAC grip with the small trim buttons - they are not
> intuitive; not easy to find with the finger tips without accidently
> trimming; and one of the aileron buttons tends to come to rest against my
> kneecap when I'm not noticing it ... i.e. Hey? why is the aircraft
> banking???? ;-)
>
> --
> Grant Corriveau
> C-GHTF / HDS / CAM100
>
>
Message 42
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | KAWO - Arlington |
--> Zenith-List message posted by: Kurt Kingston <Kurt@cfirepro.com>
Ray, I got this today from the factory XL newsletter list:
ZODIAC Enthusiasts:
<SNIP> Next month we'll have the ZODIAC XL at the NW EAA Arlington fly-in
(July 9-13, Arlington, Washington). Demo flights will be available (by
appointment) at the fly-in. Detail: http://www.zenithair.com/events.htm
O
-----Original Message-----
From: Ray Montagne [mailto:ac6qj@earthlink.net]
Subject: Zenith-List: KAWO - Arlington
--> Zenith-List message posted by: Ray Montagne <ac6qj@earthlink.net>
Any XL's headed to Arlington, WA? I'll be there, albeit in a Cessna. Would
like to talk to other builders and see some completed aircraft.
DO NOT ARCHIVE
Best Regards, Ray Montagne
Cupertino, CA
Message 43
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Mitchell Instruments... [bcc][faked-from] |
--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Don Honabach" <don@pcperfect.com>
Grant,
Thanks! If you ever get the chance to take a photo, it would be much
appreciated.
I went ahead and left a message for Mitchell and hopefully they'll have
a smaller mount for me. The guage didn't have one, and AC&S mentioned
only 4 and up clusters.
Can't wait to finish. Seems soooo close now.
Don
-----Original Message-----
From: Grant Corriveau [mailto:grantc@ca.inter.net]
Subject: Re: Zenith-List: Mitchell Instruments... [bcc][faked-from]
--> Zenith-List message posted by: Grant Corriveau <grantc@ca.inter.net>
> From: "Don Honabach" <don@pcperfect.com>
but since I have to custom make one, I was curios as to
> what others have done.
I installed the Mitchell fuel pressure gauge - maybe it's similar. It
also had no flange, but as I recall there's a back-plate and a securing
screw.
I used L-angles to make a little 'tray'/mounting well that the gauge
slides into and is secured at the back with the screw -- at least that's
what I recall. Don't have my aircraft nearby to check or take photo.
--
Grant Corriveau
C-GHTF / HDS / CAM100
direct advertising on the Matronics Forums.
Message 44
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | CH 701 float performance |
--> Zenith-List message posted by: Kurt Kingston <Kurt@cfirepro.com>
Anyone familiar with what real life cruise speeds the 701 on floats can do
with different engines?
Thanks,
Kurt
Message 45
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | 4130 Steel Plate - Cutting... |
--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Don Honabach" <don@pcperfect.com>
Can any one recommend a good way of cutting a 4130 Steel Plate (1/8"
thick)? I tried an abrasive saw, but didn't like the results or the heat
generated. I've also talked to some local sheet metal shops and they
mentioned that a normal sheer probably wouldn't handle the 4130 very
well. Do I just need to find a cut-off type metal band saw or ?
Thanks!
Don Honabach
PC Perfect, LLC
2740 S. Hardy Drive #1
Tempe, AZ 85282
480-966-0772
480-966-9304 fax
Message 46
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: 4130 Steel Plate - Cutting... |
--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Jim Cullen" <flyingcrownranch@lvcm.com>
Hi Don:
I do this routinely on a small bandsaw -- a 14-inch Delta 3-wheel benchtop.
The key lies in the blade and the blade speed. I use a 14-tpi bimetallic
blade. Standard blades won't cut it -- they'll just get dull in a hurry.
Keep the blade speed fairly slow.
Jim
----- Original Message -----
From: "Don Honabach" <don@pcperfect.com>
Subject: Zenith-List: 4130 Steel Plate - Cutting...
> --> Zenith-List message posted by: "Don Honabach" <don@pcperfect.com>
>
> Can any one recommend a good way of cutting a 4130 Steel Plate (1/8"
> thick)? I tried an abrasive saw, but didn't like the results or the heat
> generated. I've also talked to some local sheet metal shops and they
> mentioned that a normal sheer probably wouldn't handle the 4130 very
> well. Do I just need to find a cut-off type metal band saw or ?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Don Honabach
> PC Perfect, LLC
> 2740 S. Hardy Drive #1
> Tempe, AZ 85282
> 480-966-0772
> 480-966-9304 fax
>
>
Message 47
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: 601HD Joy Stick |
--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Jackie B. Johnson" <zjohnson@ucnsb.net>
My two cents worth...I chopped the "y" and used the MAC handle and have had
no troubles with the ? tiny trim" buttons..works great in my opinion..never
did understand the reason for "y", but I guess you couled get use to
anything if you wish too..
Jackie N5JZ
----- Original Message -----
From: "Grant Corriveau" <grantc@ca.inter.net>
Subject: Re: Zenith-List: 601HD Joy Stick
> --> Zenith-List message posted by: Grant Corriveau <grantc@ca.inter.net>
>
> > I have always thought I would like to do away with the "Y" stick
> > on the 601 and since I ordered my RAC grip have been thinking
> > of starting on this. Any pointers, ideas or guidence? Length or
> > angle. I was looking at it yesterday and thought I needed to
> > keep the same angle rearward as the "Y"stick.
> >
> > TIA
>
> I chopped the pax side of the 'Y' off before first flight - not planning
any
> dual training and the Y interferes with my access across the panel/lower
> sidewall on the right.
>
> I still don't care for the pilot side of the Y as it tends to get in the
way
> of my inboard knew - but I am long-legged. I am seriously contemplating
one
> more 'chop' to remove the Y altogether and install a wooden grip with 1
> pitch-trim 'cap' switch.
>
> I don't care for the MAC grip with the small trim buttons - they are not
> intuitive; not easy to find with the finger tips without accidently
> trimming; and one of the aileron buttons tends to come to rest against my
> kneecap when I'm not noticing it ... i.e. Hey? why is the aircraft
> banking???? ;-)
>
> --
> Grant Corriveau
> C-GHTF / HDS / CAM100
>
>
Message 48
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Zenith-List message posted by: Pwalsh4539@aol.com
Dave,
I have the 601/Rotax 912 w/ 16 gallon header tank. Safer in terms of fuel
flow. Worse in terms of crashworthiness. Simpler in terms of fuel system. Less
room behind panel for instruments...in fact it is not practical or maybe even
possible for vacuum instruments. I had a forced landing a while back, and one
thing on my mind was all that fuel in my lap. Then again, there was a little
gravity flow with the header tank, perhaps that is what kept her sputtering
along just enough for me to keep airspeed up for those few critical seconds.
In other words, it is simply your call, there are plenty of arguments both
pro and con. I guess simplicity is a big one, though.
Happy building and good luck.
Patrick Walsh
601 HD
Message 49
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | 4130 Steel Plate - Cutting... |
--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Don Honabach" <don@pcperfect.com>
Jim,
Thanks - I'll give it a try.
Regards,
Don
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Cullen [mailto:flyingcrownranch@lvcm.com]
Subject: Re: Zenith-List: 4130 Steel Plate - Cutting...
--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Jim Cullen"
--> <flyingcrownranch@lvcm.com>
Hi Don:
I do this routinely on a small bandsaw -- a 14-inch Delta 3-wheel
benchtop. The key lies in the blade and the blade speed. I use a 14-tpi
bimetallic blade. Standard blades won't cut it -- they'll just get dull
in a hurry. Keep the blade speed fairly slow.
Jim
----- Original Message -----
From: "Don Honabach" <don@pcperfect.com>
Subject: Zenith-List: 4130 Steel Plate - Cutting...
> --> Zenith-List message posted by: "Don Honabach" <don@pcperfect.com>
>
> Can any one recommend a good way of cutting a 4130 Steel Plate (1/8"
> thick)? I tried an abrasive saw, but didn't like the results or the
> heat generated. I've also talked to some local sheet metal shops and
> they mentioned that a normal sheer probably wouldn't handle the 4130
> very well. Do I just need to find a cut-off type metal band saw or ?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Don Honabach
> PC Perfect, LLC
> 2740 S. Hardy Drive #1
> Tempe, AZ 85282
> 480-966-0772
> 480-966-9304 fax
>
>
direct advertising on the Matronics Forums.
Message 50
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: KAWO - Arlington |
--> Zenith-List message posted by: Ray Montagne <ac6qj@earthlink.net>
On 6/23/03 3:30 PM, "Kurt Kingston" <Kurt@cfirepro.com> wrote:
> --> Zenith-List message posted by: Kurt Kingston <Kurt@cfirepro.com>
>
> Ray, I got this today from the factory XL newsletter list:
>
> ZODIAC Enthusiasts:
> <SNIP> Next month we'll have the ZODIAC XL at the NW EAA Arlington fly-in
> (July 9-13, Arlington, Washington). Demo flights will be available (by
> appointment) at the fly-in. Detail: http://www.zenithair.com/events.htm
>
> O
Thanks! I've been in communication with the factory and am trying to
schedule a demo ride. I flew down to Copperstate last year for the same
purpose, just prior to purchasing the XL kit, but air traffic conditions
didn't allow for a demo flight in the short time I was there. Still
building "Flight Unseen" and am really looking forward to a factory demo...
Best Regards, Ray Montagne
Cupertino, CA
===========================================================================
Zenith Aircraft Zodiac CH-601-XL, Jabiru 3300
Construction Log & Photos: <http://home.earthlink.net/~ac6qj/zodiac>
Build Status: Rudder completed
Elevator Completed
Stabilizer Completed
Flaps Completed
Ailerons Completed
Right Wing Under Completed
Right Wing Tip Under Construction
===========================================================================
DO NOT ARCHIVE
Message 51
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Zenith-List message posted by: Pwalsh4539@aol.com
Ground the fuel tank to the airframe!!
Message 52
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: 912S Hard Starting |
--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Dave Austin" <daveaustin2@sprint.ca>
One last try, Phil. You seem to have done good diagnostic work.
Is the key on the crankshaft loose, letting the timing wander on cranking?
Is it possible you have a leak from one plug wire (cylinder) to another,
causing the kickback?
Can't think of anything else!
Dave Austin 601HDS - 912
Message 53
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Zenith-List message posted by: Ray Montagne <ac6qj@earthlink.net>
On 6/23/03 4:26 PM, "Pwalsh4539@aol.com" <Pwalsh4539@aol.com> wrote:
> --> Zenith-List message posted by: Pwalsh4539@aol.com
>
> Ground the fuel tank to the airframe!!
>
AMEN!
DO NOT ARCHIVE
Best Regards, Ray Montagne
Cupertino, CA
===========================================================================
Zenith Aircraft Zodiac CH-601-XL, Jabiru 3300
Construction Log & Photos: <http://home.earthlink.net/~ac6qj/zodiac>
Build Status: Rudder completed
Elevator Completed
Stabilizer Completed
Flaps Completed
Ailerons Completed
Right Wing Under Completed
Right Wing Tip Under Construction
===========================================================================
Message 54
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Zenith-List message posted by: Pwalsh4539@aol.com
Seems to me that we don't want that aluminum tank vibrating and rubbing
against the aluminum firewall...or top skin.
Message 55
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Header tank (Safety concern) |
--> Zenith-List message posted by: Gary Gower <ggower_99@yahoo.com>
Gasoline is flamable... taking this in account,where ever you install
the tank(s) there is always danger of fire, any gasoline in the grass
with a short circuit can ignite.
Is one in a million to be so lucky to crush in the middle of 2 trees
exactly the gap of your fuselage, so the gas tanks stay back with the
wings.
The best thing is to aboid bad weather, in case of engine failure, fly
the airplane all the way down, if it falied, will not start, you just
will loose valuave time (and altitude), in the mean time close the
gasoline valve, shut the master switch, and do the best your training
and practice will show your insticts.
Saludos
Gary Gower.
PS. When ever you dont have a special place to go, instead of just
flying around, practice emergency landings with and wthout engine.
This is safer than remote gasoline tanks.
GG
--- Paul Sharpe <fly601@rogers.com> wrote:
> --> Zenith-List message posted by: "Paul Sharpe" <fly601@rogers.com>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> Subject: Zenith-List: Header tank
>
>
> > I was wondering if anyone has had concerns about the 16-gallon
> header tank
> behind the instrument panel. Would it be better to eliminate this
> tank, and
> install tanks in both wing lockers instead? Is the header tank a safe
> system?
>
>
> I had concerns before building my 601 because of some nasty
> accidents
> several years ago, so I opted for a leading edge tank in each wing,
> each
> with it's own Facet fuel pump, and no header tank. I'm glad I did,
> and
> would do it again if I built another 601.
>
> Paul Sharpe
> C-IABP / CH601HD
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
__________________________________
Message 56
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: 4130 Steel Plate - Cutting... |
--> Zenith-List message posted by: Michel Therrien <mtherr@yahoo.com>
Is the heat generated by the cutting wheel really an
issue? I'm asking because when I asked my weldor
about heating the metal during welding or forming, he
told me that there is no problem if you allow it to
cool down by itself (he calls this "normalizing".
Normalized 4130 is called 4130N. He said that if you
sink the metal in the water to cool it rapidly, then
it becomes "tempered".
So I think the concern is not the same as with 6061-T6
which would loose its T6 property if heated.
Michel
do not archive as these are words from a mostly
ignorant of the subject at hand.
--- Don Honabach <don@pcperfect.com> wrote:
> --> Zenith-List message posted by: "Don Honabach"
> <don@pcperfect.com>
>
> Can any one recommend a good way of cutting a 4130
> Steel Plate (1/8"
> thick)? I tried an abrasive saw, but didn't like the
> results or the heat
> generated. I've also talked to some local sheet
> metal shops and they
> mentioned that a normal sheer probably wouldn't
> handle the 4130 very
> well. Do I just need to find a cut-off type metal
> band saw or ?
=====
----------------------------
Michel Therrien CH601-HD
http://mthobby.pcperfect.com/ch601
http://www.zenithair.com/bldrlist/profiles/mthobby
http://pages.infinit.net/mthobby
__________________________________
Message 57
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: extra storage behind seat |
--> Zenith-List message posted by: Michel Therrien <mtherr@yahoo.com>
I've seen this not yet on XLs, but on HD and HDSs.
See this one:
http://mthobby.pcperfect.com/ch601/images/Dcp00267.jpg
The builder made a long compartment that allows him to
bring pairs of skis. Oh... it may take a while to
figure the picture out... it's tilted on the right
side (top is on the right). On left (bottom), this is
the reclined seat cover.
Another person I know made small compartments behind
each of the two seats. It's usefull for storing
headsets, lunch or other things you don't want to
leave on the shelve. See:
http://mthobby.pcperfect.com/ch601/images/pprjgk4.jpg
For my part, I elected not to do this. The "behind
the seat" section is my rear electrical bay where the
master solenoids, battery bus fuse blocs, autopilot
servo, ELT and Strobe power supply are positioned.
See:
http://mthobby.pcperfect.com/ch601/images/Dcp01505.jpg
http://mthobby.pcperfect.com/ch601/images/Dcp01218.jpg
http://mthobby.pcperfect.com/ch601/images/Dcp01144.jpg
I will also install my transponder antenna in that
area.
Finally, all turnbuckles for adjusting the tension of
elevator, rudder and ailerons cables are in that area:
http://mthobby.pcperfect.com/ch601/images/Dcp01463.jpg
Michel
> > > --> Zenith-List message posted by:
CLOJAN@aol.com
I was wondering if anyone thought
> about building a
> "trunk"
> > in this area to keep the small stuff concealed
> that you don't want in
> public
> > view? I
=====
----------------------------
Michel Therrien CH601-HD
http://mthobby.pcperfect.com/ch601
http://www.zenithair.com/bldrlist/profiles/mthobby
http://pages.infinit.net/mthobby
__________________________________
Message 58
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Philip Polstra" <ppolstra@mindspring.com>
My tank didn't rupture that I'm aware in my crash last week. The gas all
leaked out over the course of several hours after the accident. I think it
was because the gascolator was sheared off and/or fuel lines breached by the
crash. This would have been true for wing tanks as well.
--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Rockin Rim Ranch, Inc."
<dave@rockinrimranch.com>
I was wondering if anyone has had concerns about the 16-gallon header tank
behind the instrument panel. Would it be better to eliminate this tank, and
install tanks in both wing lockers instead? Is the header tank a safe
system?
Message 59
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Rockin Rim Ranch, Inc." <dave@rockinrimranch.com>
Thanks, Patrick. Maybe the best bet is to install another fuel shutoff valve
connected to a drain line through the floor, so the fuel can be dumped in
flight after an engine failure.
Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: <Pwalsh4539@aol.com>
Subject: Re: Zenith-List: Header tank
> --> Zenith-List message posted by: Pwalsh4539@aol.com
>
> Dave,
> I have the 601/Rotax 912 w/ 16 gallon header tank. Safer in terms of fuel
> flow. Worse in terms of crashworthiness. Simpler in terms of fuel system.
Less
> room behind panel for instruments...in fact it is not practical or maybe
even
> possible for vacuum instruments. I had a forced landing a while back, and
one
> thing on my mind was all that fuel in my lap. Then again, there was a
little
> gravity flow with the header tank, perhaps that is what kept her
sputtering
> along just enough for me to keep airspeed up for those few critical
seconds.
> In other words, it is simply your call, there are plenty of arguments
both
> pro and con. I guess simplicity is a big one, though.
> Happy building and good luck.
> Patrick Walsh
> 601 HD
>
>
Message 60
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: KAWO - Arlington |
--> Zenith-List message posted by: Winston Ellis <w1mdi@cox-internet.com>
> I am building a 701 and am planning on being at Arlington. We should try and
> have a 701 "get together." Maybe this year there will be a real 701 there!
DO NOT ARCHIVE
Winston Ellis
Ketchum, Idaho
CH701/Suzuki
> Indeed, I'm in the same situation, although I am more interested in 701's
> and I'll be showing up in a Beech.
>
> DO NOT ARCHIVE
>
> Frank Stutzman
> Bonanza N494B "Hula Girl"
> Hood River, OR
>
Message 61
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Seal-Send-Time: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 21:35:34 -0400
--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Jeff Small" <zodiacjeff@msn.com>
> Is the header tank a safe system?
Nope..........!!!!!!
John W. Tarabocchia
Very strong reaction. Six exclamation points!!!!!!
Is this opinion or based on factual evidence? May we have the facts please.
Regards jeff
do not archive
Message 62
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Zenith-List message posted by: ZodiacBuilder@aol.com
In a message dated 6/23/2003 9:36:01 PM Eastern Standard Time,
zodiacjeff@msn.com writes:
> > Is the header tank a safe system?
>
> Nope..........!!!!!!
> John W. Tarabocchia
>
> Very strong reaction. Six exclamation points!!!!!!
>
> Is this opinion or based on factual evidence? May we have the facts
> please.
>
> Regards jeff
>
> do not archive
>
Simply my opinion....If you really need me to clarify.
I have visions of a 16 or 8 gallon fuel tank rupturing on impact. Then being
ignited by an electrical wire tearing loose behind the panel. All this while
the fuel is pouring onto ones lap (Isn't this how napalm works). While one
is trying to unfasten ones seat belt and trying to get the canopy open, ones
cloths and skin are melting. If one does make it out alive, one may wish they
didn't.
Again this is only one pilots opinion...
John W. Tarabocchia
http://www.hometown.aol.com/zodiacbuilder/
N6042T 100hrs. flown
Message 63
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: 601HD Joy Stick |
--> Zenith-List message posted by: CBRxxDRV@aol.com
In a message dated 6/23/03 7:12:11 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
zjohnson@ucnsb.net writes:
> My two cents worth...I chopped the "y" and used the MAC handle and have had
> no troubles with the ? tiny trim" buttons..works great in my opinion..never
> did understand the reason for "y", but I guess you couled get use to
> anything if you wish too..
> Jackie N5JZ
>
Did you add anything to the stick or just mounted the grip to what
was left ?
Sal Capra
Lakeland, FL
<A HREF="http://hometown.aol.com/cbrxxdrv/index.html">My Home Page
http://hometown.aol.com/cbrxxdrv/index.html
Message 64
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Zenith-List message posted by: Michel Therrien <mtherr@yahoo.com>
I keep a news paper picture in my garage to remind me
about safety. This is the one of that plane that had
bagage compartment open in flight. The plane stalled
above the ground and did a hard landing (it was not
referred to as a crash, even though the G load may
have exceeded 9 Gs). Header tank ruptured and plane
(cabin) got in flame.
I decided right at that moment that I did not want a
fuel reservoir above my legs.
Michel
--- ZodiacBuilder@aol.com wrote:
> --> Zenith-List message posted by:
> ZodiacBuilder@aol.com
>
> In a message dated 6/23/2003 9:36:01 PM Eastern
> Standard Time,
> zodiacjeff@msn.com writes:
>
>
> > > Is the header tank a safe system?
> >
> > Nope..........!!!!!!
> > John W. Tarabocchia
> >
> > Very strong reaction. Six exclamation
> points!!!!!!
> >
> > Is this opinion or based on factual evidence?
> May we have the facts
> > please.
> >
> > Regards jeff
> >
> > do not archive
> >
>
> Simply my opinion....If you really need me to
> clarify.
>
> I have visions of a 16 or 8 gallon fuel tank
> rupturing on impact. Then being
> ignited by an electrical wire tearing loose behind
> the panel. All this while
> the fuel is pouring onto ones lap (Isn't this how
> napalm works). While one
> is trying to unfasten ones seat belt and trying to
> get the canopy open, ones
> cloths and skin are melting. If one does make it
> out alive, one may wish they
> didn't.
>
> Again this is only one pilots opinion...
>
=====
----------------------------
Michel Therrien CH601-HD
http://mthobby.pcperfect.com/ch601
http://www.zenithair.com/bldrlist/profiles/mthobby
http://pages.infinit.net/mthobby
__________________________________
Message 65
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: KAWO - Arlington |
--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Scott Laughlin" <cookwithgas@hotmail.com>
Ray:
I was able to fly at my rudder building session at the ZAC factory. You
will be pleasantly surprised at how nice the plane flies. It was tight and
handled well. I was a bit surprised at how nice the finished product looked
and flew. You will enjoy the demo ride (when you get the chance).
You are progressing well - thanks for all the pictures on your web site. I
enjoy looking at them from time to time.
Scott Laughlin
601XL Plans builder
www.cooknwithgas.com
----Original Message Follows----
From: Ray Montagne <ac6qj@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Zenith-List: KAWO - Arlington
--> Zenith-List message posted by: Ray Montagne <ac6qj@earthlink.net>
On 6/23/03 3:30 PM, "Kurt Kingston" <Kurt@cfirepro.com> wrote:
> --> Zenith-List message posted by: Kurt Kingston <Kurt@cfirepro.com>
>
> Ray, I got this today from the factory XL newsletter list:
>
> ZODIAC Enthusiasts:
> <SNIP> Next month we'll have the ZODIAC XL at the NW EAA Arlington fly-in
> (July 9-13, Arlington, Washington). Demo flights will be available (by
> appointment) at the fly-in. Detail: http://www.zenithair.com/events.htm
>
> O
Thanks! I've been in communication with the factory and am trying to
schedule a demo ride. I flew down to Copperstate last year for the same
purpose, just prior to purchasing the XL kit, but air traffic conditions
didn't allow for a demo flight in the short time I was there. Still
building "Flight Unseen" and am really looking forward to a factory demo...
Best Regards, Ray Montagne
Cupertino, CA
===========================================================================
Zenith Aircraft Zodiac CH-601-XL, Jabiru 3300
Construction Log & Photos: <http://home.earthlink.net/~ac6qj/zodiac>
Build Status: Rudder completed
Elevator Completed
Stabilizer Completed
Flaps Completed
Ailerons Completed
Right Wing Under Completed
Right Wing Tip Under Construction
===========================================================================
DO NOT ARCHIVE
Message 66
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: KAWO - Arlington |
--> Zenith-List message posted by: Ray Montagne <ac6qj@earthlink.net>
On 6/23/03 8:01 PM, "Scott Laughlin" <cookwithgas@hotmail.com> wrote:
> --> Zenith-List message posted by: "Scott Laughlin" <cookwithgas@hotmail.com>
>
> Ray:
>
> It was tight and
> handled well. I was a bit surprised at how nice the finished product looked
> and flew.
>
Hi Scott,
Thanks for the flight evaluation. I've seen several. Including an
absolutely fantastic piece of workmanship at RIU last time I flew in to
visit my parents. Looking forward to a ride!
Thanks for the website comments too!
DO NOT ARCHIVE
Best Regards, Ray Montagne
Cupertino, CA
===========================================================================
Zenith Aircraft Zodiac CH-601-XL, Jabiru 3300
Construction Log & Photos: <http://home.earthlink.net/~ac6qj/zodiac>
Build Status: Rudder completed
Elevator Completed
Stabilizer Completed
Flaps Completed
Ailerons Completed
Right Wing Under Completed
Right Wing Tip Under Construction
===========================================================================
Message 67
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Zenith-List message posted by: Gary Gower <ggower_99@yahoo.com>
Cork is insulation from vibration.
The tanks are grounded to the plane by a cable riveted to a tab in the
side of the tank (701).
Saludos
Gary Gower.
--- "Rockin Rim Ranch, Inc." <dave@rockinrimranch.com> wrote:
> --> Zenith-List message posted by: "Rockin Rim Ranch, Inc."
> <dave@rockinrimranch.com>
>
> Thanks for the info, Mark. Sounds like your system works fairly well.
>
> Incidently, do you know why ZAC requires cork between the metal
> header tank
> and the fuselage? I thought all metal parts had to be grounded,
> including
> the fuel tank. When refueling, do you connect the grounding line from
> the
> FBO fuel pump to the headr tank, or to the aircraft itself?
>
> Thanks....Dave
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mark A. Wood" <Mark.Wood@uvm.edu>
> To: <zenith-list@matronics.com>
> Subject: Re: Zenith-List: Header tank
>
>
> > --> Zenith-List message posted by: "Mark A. Wood"
> <Mark.Wood@uvm.edu>
> >
> > Dave
> >
> > I have a shut off on the line from each tank as it comes in from
> the
> > wing tank (these will both stay open in normal use). They T into a
> > single Facet fuel pump which pumps to the header. From the header I
> > have a overflow / return line which returns to my right wing tank.
> > Also from the header it is gravity feed to the gascolator and then
> > the Aero-Carb carburetor by Sonex. This carburetor uses very low
> fuel
> > pressure, but I would assume that the standard carb on my O-200
> would
> > also work gravity feed on this system.
> >
> > This is not yet a tested system. I hope to have the air duct work
> in
> > my cowl done in the next two weeks and will then be ready to fire
> it
> > up for the first time, and give it a test.
> >
> > Mark
> >
> >
> > >--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Rockin Rim Ranch, Inc."
> > ><dave@rockinrimranch.com>
> > >
> > >Thanks Mark. I was planning on installing a Facet fuel pump in
> series or
> > >parallel as a backup. How is your system set up? Do you feed your
> header
> > >tank by pumping fuel ito it from the wing tanks? Or do all tanks
> feed the
> > >gascolator through a fuel selector switch?
> > >
> > >Dave
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: "Mark A. Wood" <Mark.Wood@uvm.edu>
> > >To: <zenith-list@matronics.com>
> > >Subject: Re: Zenith-List: Header tank
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Mark Wood
> > Assistive Technology Consultant, VT I-Team
> > Center on Disability and Community Inclusion
> > University of Vermont
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
__________________________________
Message 68
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Zenith-List message posted by: Gary Gower <ggower_99@yahoo.com>
insulation from vibration, also to prevent any movement betwen the tank
and the wing, like using a file... will eventualy leak fuel.
Saludos
Gary Gower
--- "Rockin Rim Ranch, Inc." <dave@rockinrimranch.com> wrote:
> --> Zenith-List message posted by: "Rockin Rim Ranch, Inc."
> <dave@rockinrimranch.com>
>
> Ray,
>
> Question is.......if you're going to ground the tank with a wire, why
> does
> the tank have to be separated from the fuselage with cork? Wouldn't
> the tank
> touching the fuselage be a good ground?
>
> Thanks...Dave
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ray Montagne" <ac6qj@earthlink.net>
> To: "Zenith List" <zenith-list@matronics.com>
> Subject: Re: Zenith-List: Header tank
>
>
> > --> Zenith-List message posted by: Ray Montagne
> <ac6qj@earthlink.net>
> >
> > On 6/23/03 12:33 PM, "Rockin Rim Ranch, Inc."
> <dave@rockinrimranch.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > --> Zenith-List message posted by: "Rockin Rim Ranch, Inc."
> > > <dave@rockinrimranch.com>
> > >
> > > Incidently, do you know why ZAC requires cork between the metal
> header
> tank
> > > and the fuselage? I thought all metal parts had to be grounded,
> including
> > > the fuel tank. When refueling, do you connect the grounding line
> from
> the
> > > FBO fuel pump to the headr tank, or to the aircraft itself?
> > >
> >
> > Cork is also used on the wing tanks on the XL. The tanks include a
> tab to
> > connect a grounding wire.
> >
> >
> > Best Regards, Ray Montagne
> > EAA: 697920
> > AOPA: 039409692
> >
> >
>
===========================================================================
> >
> > Zenith Aircraft Zodiac CH-601-XL builder #4939, Jabiru 3300
> > Construction Log & Photos:
> <http://home.earthlink.net/~ac6qj/zodiac>
> > Build Status: Rudder completed
> > Elevator Completed
> > Stabilizer Completed
> > Flaps Completed
> > Ailerons Completed
> > Right Wing Under Completed
> > Right Wing Tip Under Construction
> >
> >
>
===========================================================================
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
__________________________________
Message 69
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Zenith-List message posted by: Gary Gower <ggower_99@yahoo.com>
Concentrate in flying the plane down. Once in the correct glide path
and the "target" landing space secured, shut the fuel valve, switch off
the master and as a insurance, a little prayer.
Practice to find the position of both (master and gas valve) without
looking, like when (on the road) we change from main tank to reserve in
the motorcycle.
Saludos
Gary Gower
--- "Rockin Rim Ranch, Inc." <dave@rockinrimranch.com> wrote:
> --> Zenith-List message posted by: "Rockin Rim Ranch, Inc."
> <dave@rockinrimranch.com>
>
> Thanks, Patrick. Maybe the best bet is to install another fuel
> shutoff valve
> connected to a drain line through the floor, so the fuel can be
> dumped in
> flight after an engine failure.
>
> Dave
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <Pwalsh4539@aol.com>
> To: <zenith-list@matronics.com>
> Subject: Re: Zenith-List: Header tank
>
>
> > --> Zenith-List message posted by: Pwalsh4539@aol.com
> >
> > Dave,
> > I have the 601/Rotax 912 w/ 16 gallon header tank. Safer in terms
> of fuel
> > flow. Worse in terms of crashworthiness. Simpler in terms of fuel
> system.
> Less
> > room behind panel for instruments...in fact it is not practical or
> maybe
> even
> > possible for vacuum instruments. I had a forced landing a while
> back, and
> one
> > thing on my mind was all that fuel in my lap. Then again, there was
> a
> little
> > gravity flow with the header tank, perhaps that is what kept her
> sputtering
> > along just enough for me to keep airspeed up for those few critical
> seconds.
> > In other words, it is simply your call, there are plenty of
> arguments
> both
> > pro and con. I guess simplicity is a big one, though.
> > Happy building and good luck.
> > Patrick Walsh
> > 601 HD
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
__________________________________
Message 70
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: Header tank (Murphy's law?) |
--> Zenith-List message posted by: Gary Gower <ggower_99@yahoo.com>
--- ZodiacBuilder@aol.com wrote:
> --> Zenith-List message posted by: ZodiacBuilder@aol.com
>
> In a message dated 6/23/2003 9:36:01 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> zodiacjeff@msn.com writes:
>
>
> > > Is the header tank a safe system?
> >
> > Nope..........!!!!!!
> > John W. Tarabocchia
> >
> > Very strong reaction. Six exclamation points!!!!!!
> >
> > Is this opinion or based on factual evidence? May we have the
> facts
> > please.
> >
> > Regards jeff
> >
> > do not archive
> >
>
> Simply my opinion....If you really need me to clarify.
>
> I have visions of a 16 or 8 gallon fuel tank rupturing on impact.
> Then being
> ignited by an electrical wire tearing loose behind the panel. All
> this while
> the fuel is pouring onto ones lap (Isn't this how napalm works).
> While one
> is trying to unfasten ones seat belt and trying to get the canopy
> open, ones
> cloths and skin are melting. If one does make it out alive, one may
> wish they
> didn't.
>
> Again this is only one pilots opinion...
>
>
> John W. Tarabocchia
> http://www.hometown.aol.com/zodiacbuilder/
>
> N6042T 100hrs. flown
>
In the book "Gift of Wings" by Richard Back, there is a part where he
mentions something like this: "Take care of what you think or wish,
because some day you will get it" "if you want a plane you will own
one some day" not a quote, just what I remember, great book.
In the event of a "regular impact" crash landing, hard enough to brake
the gas tanks (also legs broken maybe), the posibility of the plane
resting a little in one side are big (front wheel and one side landing
gear colapse).
So we will also have gasoline driping fron the higher wing tank to the
neck (in a high wing plane), or in the kidneys area (in a low wing
plane)... or all over the place in the floor (in both cases).
If we manage to shut the master, and dont land in rocks or pavement
(metal friction), the chances of fire are low... I HOPE.
Saludos
Gary Gower.
Why dont we think a little positive from now on? Lots of pilots never
crash in their lives, only a hand full of the forced landing one's wont
survive. Keep calm and react as trained.
__________________________________
http://search.yahoo.com
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|