Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 03:22 AM - Re: 912S (Pwalsh4539@aol.com)
2. 05:15 AM - Re: 601 Early Flight Update (Grant Corriveau)
3. 05:24 AM - Re: enlogated elevator mount holes was--> Re: 601 EarlyFlight Update (Frank Jones)
4. 07:24 AM - Re: Copperstate 2003 (Hal Rozema)
5. 08:40 AM - 601XL MTOW (Kafka, Jeff)
6. 08:40 AM - Re: enlogated elevator mount holes was--> Re: 601 EarlyFlight U... (JERICKSON03E@aol.com)
7. 09:32 AM - Re: 912S (Dave Pepper)
8. 09:33 AM - Re: 912S (Dave Pepper)
9. 09:54 AM - Re: 601XL MTOW (HINDE,FRANK (HP-Corvallis,ex1))
10. 09:57 AM - Re: enlogated elevator mount holes was--> Re: 601 EarlyFlight U... (CLOJAN@aol.com)
11. 09:59 AM - Re: 601XL MTOW (Chip W Erwin)
12. 06:16 PM - Re: 601XL MTOW (Scott Laughlin)
13. 07:05 PM - Re: enlogated elevator mount holes was--> Re: 601 (xl)
14. 11:41 PM - Re: 912S (Pwalsh4539@aol.com)
Message 1
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Zenith-List message posted by: Pwalsh4539@aol.com
Just a guess, but if you bought the 912 UL version...S or otherwise, it would
not include a manifold, airbox, etc. Those items are for the certified
version as I undsrstand it...that it the F series, I think...for even more
$$....perhaps you have the manual for that engine...
Patrick Walsh
601 HD with 912UL...
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: 601 Early Flight Update |
--> Zenith-List message posted by: Grant Corriveau <grantc@ca.inter.net>
> The change to the attach point is pretty easy really, just need to move
> the rear holes up 3.7mm. This will involve elongating the holes. I'll
> then use a stainless washer with a bent tab (kindof like on a bicycle
> wheel) to keep the bolt in position. Should be no need for a doubler.
Very clever way to measure the tailplane angle! I like it. Please keep us
posted on how it goes.
Thanks,
--
Grant Corriveau
C-GHTF / HDS / CAM100
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Update
--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Frank Jones" <fjones@sympatico.ca>
Joe,
> I hope that you are joking.
> I am not an aeronautical engineer.
> I'm just a another stranger on the bus.
> I'm finishing up my 601XL (set back by a canopy crack).
> Enlongated holes are not good.
> Imagine the bolt moving up and down - and failing.
> Why can't you drill out the mount plate and rivet a longer one.
I share your concern about elongated holes. Solutions I'm considering:
1) what you propose - drill out mount plate and rivet in a new one, 2)
double the top section of the existing mount plate and rivet it to the
existing mount plate, 3) drill the new hole in the existing plate (3.5mm
higher) and use a steel washer with bent tab (kindof like on a bicycle
wheel) to "fill" the old hold and prevent the bolt from going up and
down.
I favor the 2nd option. I don't like drilling out critical rivets and
redoing them. It's impossible to avoid making the holes slightly larger
(i.e. elongated). So I'm likely going to take the doubling approach.
Message 4
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Copperstate 2003 |
--> Zenith-List message posted by: Hal Rozema <hartist1@cox.net>
I spoke with Roger Dubbert by cell phone Monday. He was in Kansas on his way
to Cooperstate. Expected to arrive Wednesday afternoon. He is flying the
factory demo STOLCH701. He will be giving a limited number of demo flights, I
understand by appointment.
Hal Rozema
N701PF
VSTOLCH701/3300
theplanefolks.net
Rick Pitcher wrote:
> --> Zenith-List message posted by: Rick Pitcher <rick.pitcher@verizon.net>
>
> No fly-ins so far huh?
> I see from the exhibitors list that Zenith is gonna be there. I hope
> they bring more that just pamphlets, I'd sure like to get a ride.
> Hmmmm..... maybe I'd better call 'em and see if I can reserve a time slot.
>
> Rick P.
>
Message 5
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Kafka, Jeff" <JKafka@trojanuv.com>
I see ZAC has posted a Sample POH for the 601XL, prepared by Czech Air Works, in
the Builders Updates section of their web page.
Unless I am misreading it, it indicates a Max. Takeoff Weight of 992 lb., as opposed
to the ZAC published gross weight of 1300 lb (with a Rotax 912 ULS). CAW
empty weight is 595 lb. V. ZACs of 700 lb. Maybe the sample has omitted the
engine or something.
Hopefully this is not a real number, part of ensuring this is only a Sample. If
it is, I may have to look for another project, or convert this one into a single-seater.
Any thoughts?
Jeff Kafka
601XL Plans: Tail, Flaps and Ailerons ready for inspection.
Working on parts for Wings.
Do Not Archive
Message 6
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: 601 EarlyFlight |
U...
--> Zenith-List message posted by: JERICKSON03E@aol.com
In a message dated 10/8/2003 7:25:17 AM Central Daylight Time,
fjones@sympatico.ca writes:
> > Enlongated holes are not good.
> > Imagine the bolt moving up and down - and failing.
>
Have you considered a larger bolt? Watch the edge distance, and ask ZAC
before doing it.
J Erickson, 701 SP
<HTML><FONT FACEarial,helvetica><FONT SIZE2>In a message dated 10/8/2=
003 7:25:17 AM Central Daylight Time, fjones@sympatico.ca writes:
<BR>
<BR>
<BR><BLOCKQUOTE TYPECITE style"BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-=
LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">> Enlongated holes are n=
ot good.
<BR>> Imagine the bolt moving up and down - and failing.
<BR></FONT><FONT COLOR"#000000" SIZE3 FAMILY"SANSSERIF" FACE"Ar=
ial" LANG"0"></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR></FONT><FONT COLOR"#000000" SIZE2 FAMILY"SANSSERIF" FACE"Ar=
ial" LANG"0">
<BR>Have you considered a larger bolt? Watch the edge distance, and ask ZAC=20=
before doing it.
<BR>
<BR>J Erickson, 701 SP</FONT></HTML>
Message 7
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Dave Pepper" <rockinrimranch@earthlink.net>
I've seen some of these pictures. They don't make a lot of sense to me
though.
Thanks...Dave
>
> Did you try thr "builder's only section" on the ZAC website?
> They have a bunch of color photo assembly guides for the Rotax 912 and
> the Jabiru 3300 engine installations. They're in with the "XL" updates,
> but they apply to the "HD" too.
>
>
Message 8
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Dave Pepper" <rockinrimranch@earthlink.net>
The manual downloaded was for the 912ULS. That's where I got the info about
what is supposed to be included. Aviation is really a wallet-emptying
enterprise....is it worth it?
Dave
.com
>
> Just a guess, but if you bought the 912 UL version...S or otherwise, it
would
> not include a manifold, airbox, etc. Those items are for the certified
> version as I undsrstand it...that it the F series, I think...for even more
> $$....perhaps you have the manual for that engine...
> Patrick Walsh
> 601 HD with 912UL...
>
>
Message 9
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Zenith-List message posted by: "HINDE,FRANK (HP-Corvallis,ex1)" <frank.hinde@hp.com>
Can't be right...I fly an HDS plated at 1200lbs...I regularly fly at close
to 1300lb (because several planes have come out "heavy" and ZAC has aloowed
the higher weight.
I can tell you it flys like a pregnant duck at this weight but it will fly
and the stall speed is not too high.
You will be fine following ZAC's numbers.
Frank
601 HDS 307 hours (Stratus with Ram heads)
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-zenith-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-zenith-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Kafka, Jeff
Subject: Zenith-List: 601XL MTOW
--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Kafka, Jeff" <JKafka@trojanuv.com>
I see ZAC has posted a Sample POH for the 601XL, prepared by Czech Air
Works, in the Builders Updates section of their web page.
Unless I am misreading it, it indicates a Max. Takeoff Weight of 992 lb., as
opposed to the ZAC published gross weight of 1300 lb (with a Rotax 912 ULS).
CAW empty weight is 595 lb. V. ZACs of 700 lb. Maybe the sample has omitted
the engine or something.
Hopefully this is not a real number, part of ensuring this is only a Sample.
If it is, I may have to look for another project, or convert this one into a
single-seater.
Any thoughts?
Jeff Kafka
601XL Plans: Tail, Flaps and Ailerons ready for inspection.
Working on parts for Wings.
Do Not Archive
advertising on the Matronics Forums.
Message 10
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: 601 EarlyFlight |
U...
--> Zenith-List message posted by: CLOJAN@aol.com
In a message dated 10/8/03 8:25:17 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
fjones@sympatico.ca writes:
> I favor the 2nd option. I don't like drilling out critical rivets and
> redoing them
In this situation you could always drill out to 3/16 and use bolts.
Jack Russell
601xl Jab
fuselage
<HTML><FONT FACEarial,helvetica><FONT SIZE2>In a message dated 10/8/0=
3 8:25:17 AM Eastern Daylight Time, fjones@sympatico.ca writes:
<BR>
<BR>
<BR><BLOCKQUOTE TYPECITE style"BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-=
LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">I favor the 2nd option. I d=
on't like drilling out critical rivets and
<BR>redoing them</FONT><FONT COLOR"#000000" SIZE3 FAMILY"SANSSERIF=
" FACE"Arial" LANG"0"></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR></FONT><FONT COLOR"#000000" SIZE2 FAMILY"SANSSERIF" FACE"Ar=
ial" LANG"0">
<BR>In this situation you could always drill out to 3/16 and use bolts.
<BR>Jack Russell
<BR>601xl Jab
<BR>fuselage</FONT></HTML>
Message 11
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Chip W Erwin" <aircraft@czaw.cz>
Our POH is designed for the European UL rules so the figures match the
regulations, not the real design parameters. And our XL is lighter as we
use composite gear. As you are in the experimental class, you can use
the numbers published by Zenith.
Cheers,
CHIP
Chip W. Erwin
CZECH AIRCRAFT WORKS, S.R.O.
Manufacturer of Sport Aircraft & Aircraft Floats
Lucn 1824, 686 02 Star Mesto, Czech Republic
Tel: +420 572 543 456 Fax: +420 572 543 692
USA Fax: (772) 264 0936
Mobile Tel: (420) 602 342 717
E-mail: aircraft@czaw.cz www.airplane.cz
I see ZAC has posted a Sample POH for the 601XL, prepared by Czech Air
Works, in the Builders Updates section of their web page.
Unless I am misreading it, it indicates a Max. Takeoff Weight of 992
lb., as opposed to the ZAC published gross weight of 1300 lb (with a
Rotax 912 ULS). CAW empty weight is 595 lb. V. ZACs of 700 lb. Maybe
the sample has omitted the engine or something.
Hopefully this is not a real number, part of ensuring this is only a
Sample. If it is, I may have to look for another project, or convert
this one into a single-seater.
Any thoughts?
Jeff Kafka
---
Message 12
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Scott Laughlin" <cookwithgas@hotmail.com>
<snip>
" And our XL is lighter as we use composite gear. "
<endsnip>
Where does one find more information on Composite Gear?
"Do Not Archive"
Add MSN 8 Internet Software to your existing Internet access and enjoy
Message 13
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
EarlyFlight U...
EarlyFlight U...
--> Zenith-List message posted by: xl <xl@prosody.org>
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 CLOJAN@aol.com wrote:
> --> Zenith-List message posted by: CLOJAN@aol.com
> In a message dated 10/8/03 8:25:17 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> fjones@sympatico.ca writes:
>
> > I favor the 2nd option. I don't like drilling out critical rivets and
> > redoing them
>
> In this situation you could always drill out to 3/16 and use bolts.
> Jack Russell
Or use A6 rivets instead of A5.
Joe
Message 14
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
--> Zenith-List message posted by: Pwalsh4539@aol.com
-------------------------------1065649555
I cant speak for the 912uls...I have the standard 912ul...but I have no
manifold or airbox, as is the case with most 601s with the 912, I think....what
is
everyone else with a 912 using???
My manual, which came with the engine did not mention the airbox or
manifold, however I did order a manual for the 912f...and it did have those items
included.
Is avaition worth it??!!...well, that depends on who you talk to and what
you are comparing it to...sort of relative, I think. No doubt, it is expensive,
but least costly when you build your own, and maintain your own. ...
-------------------------------1065649555
<HTML><HEAD>
tutf-8">
<META content"MSHTML 5.50.4134.100" nameGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY style"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; BACKGROUND-COLOR: #fffff=
f">
<DIV>I cant speak for the 912uls...I have the standard 912ul...but I have no=
manifold or airbox, as is the case with most 601s with the 912, I think....=
what is everyone else with a 912 using???</DIV>
<DIV> My manual, which came with the engine did not mention the airbox=20=
or manifold, however I did order a manual for the 912f...and it did have tho=
se items included.</DIV>
<DIV> Is avaition worth it??!!...well, that depends on who you talk to=20=
and what you are comparing it to...sort of relative, I think. No doubt, it i=
s expensive, but least costly when you build your own, and maintain your own=
. ...<BR></DIV></BODY></HTML>
-------------------------------1065649555--
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|