Zenith-List Digest Archive

Sat 04/17/04


Total Messages Posted: 6



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 06:08 AM - Re: Zenith-List Digest: 37 Msgs - 04/16/04 (Grant Corriveau)
     2. 08:49 AM - 601 Nosewheel versus tailwheel decision (Graham Kirby)
     3. 10:51 AM - Re: 601 Nosewheel versus tailwheel decision (Mike Fothergill)
     4. 01:13 PM - Re: nose wheel control rods (Fred Sanford)
     5. 06:50 PM - Re: nose wheel control rods (Larry McFarland)
     6. 08:21 PM - Re: N801ZA  (Rich)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:08:56 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Zenith-List Digest: 37 Msgs - 04/16/04
    From: Grant Corriveau <grantc@ca.inter.net>
    QUARANTINE_LEVEL=4.0 KILL_LEVEL=5.0 testsX-Barracuda-Spam-Report": zenith-list@matronics.com --> Zenith-List message posted by: Grant Corriveau <grantc@ca.inter.net> > As far as I know, having two aboard isn't legal in Canada. I believe the regulation reads that the test flight can carry only 'crew members' -- no passengers. My wife (a commercial pilot/flight instructor) flew the test flights with me as co-pilot, which came in handy when my trim fuse burned out on takeoff. She replaced the fuse while I flew and we were able to complete the flight -- also she did the radio work, monitored engine gauges, watched for airport traffic, etc... Our local RAA inspector agreed with my interpretation of the rules that this was legal. (BTW it turned out that the trim fuse burnt out only if I trimmed while the PTT button was being used -- i.e. I'd inadvertantly reversed a wire in the MAC grip ...) -- Grant Corriveau C-GHTF / HDS / CAM100


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:49:13 AM PST US
    From: "Graham Kirby" <gkirby@yahoo.com>
    Subject: 601 Nosewheel versus tailwheel decision
    pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- --> Zenith-List message posted by: "Graham Kirby" <gkirby@yahoo.com> Given the great and frequent discussion of problems/challenges with the 601 nosewheel mechanism I am almost settled on building my 601HD as a taildragger. Has anyone who has built a 601 taildragger had any mechanical issues with the tailwheel arrangement? For example, does the rudder self-center as it should? Thanks Graham Kirby 601HD


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:51:28 AM PST US
    From: Mike Fothergill <mfothergill@sympatico.ca>
    Subject: Re: 601 Nosewheel versus tailwheel decision
    QUARANTINE_LEVEL=4.0 KILL_LEVEL=5.0 --> Zenith-List message posted by: Mike Fothergill <mfothergill@sympatico.ca> Hi Graham; You will need to attach long soft springs from the pedals to the firewall to keep the tension on the cables. The Matco tail wheel works well if the linkage to the rudder is set up so that the tail wheel unlocks just at full rudder travel. Mike C-FRND UHS Spinners Graham Kirby wrote: > > --> Zenith-List message posted by: "Graham Kirby" <gkirby@yahoo.com> > > Given the great and frequent discussion of problems/challenges with the 601 > nosewheel mechanism I am almost settled on building my 601HD as a > taildragger. Has anyone who has built a 601 taildragger had any mechanical > issues with the tailwheel arrangement? For example, does the rudder > self-center as it should? > > Thanks > Graham Kirby > 601HD >


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:13:53 PM PST US
    From: Fred Sanford <sonar1@cox.net>
    Subject: Re: nose wheel control rods
    --> Zenith-List message posted by: Fred Sanford <sonar1@cox.net> Hi Dan: I plan to sew up boots from nomex cloth with kevlar thread - the same stuff that firemen use. We use it in high power rocketry to protect the parachutes from the black powder ejection blast. Simple to use, flexible denim-type cloth. Kevlar thread: http://www.asp-rocketry.com/components.html Nomex: http://www.asp-rocketry.com/recoverydevices.html Fred Sanford Waiting for 701 kit do not archive


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:50:20 PM PST US
    From: "Larry McFarland" <larrymc@qconline.com>
    Subject: Re: nose wheel control rods
    --> Zenith-List message posted by: "Larry McFarland" <larrymc@qconline.com> > I'm just wondering what people are doing for the slots in the firewall where > the nose wheel push rods go through the firewall? > Dan Knezacek > CH 601HD EA81 soob (reductions re-drive) > Do not archive > Dan, I sanwiched two pieces of slotted aluminum either side of a pair of side strips and placed a slider inside with a grommet that fits the rod. The sliding piece of aluminum moves freely, but seals as well as any other method. No drag anywhere on the rod or slider. Larry C. McFarland


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:21:26 PM PST US
    From: "Rich" <rbauer@INTERGATE.COM>
    Subject: Re: N801ZA
    --> Zenith-List message posted by: "Rich" <rbauer@intergate.com> Way to go Jim. Keep us posted & God Speed! Rich ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Frisby" <n801za@hotmail.com> Subject: Zenith-List: N801ZA > --> Zenith-List message posted by: "Jim Frisby" <n801za@hotmail.com> > > To all. > > Today I got the official airworthiness certificate from an Anchorage FSDO > rep. Taxi and "in ground effect" tests indicate good handling > characteristics. I plan to take it around the pattern tomorrow. Watch this > space for flight report. > > Thanks to all participants in the Zenith matronics list, I have gathered > many hints from builders of 801s and other models from reading your > discussions. > > Jim Frisby > N801ZA > Palmer, Alaska > Finished and almost flying... > >




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   zenith-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Zenith-List.htm
  • Full Archive Search Engine
  •   http://www.matronics.com/search
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/zenith-list
  • Browse Zenith-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/zenith-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contributions

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --