Zenith-List Digest Archive

Fri 03/24/06


Total Messages Posted: 29



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 02:43 AM - Email address for builder N447WB (Clive Richards)
     2. 02:43 AM - Re: Ready to start project (Dave G.)
     3. 03:12 AM - Rivet sources (Jean-Paul Roy)
     4. 04:17 AM - Re: Ready to start project (Bob Unternaehrer)
     5. 06:03 AM - Re: Ready to start project (William Dominguez)
     6. 06:19 AM - Re: Ready to start project (B Johnson)
     7. 07:00 AM - Re: Ready to start project (Jeff Davidson)
     8. 07:38 AM - Re: Ailerons and roll bars (Kelly Meiste)
     9. 07:38 AM - Re: Ready to start project (Ron Butterfield)
    10. 07:38 AM - Re: Ready to start project (Hinde, Frank George (Corvallis))
    11. 07:39 AM - Re: Ready to start project (Kevin Kinney)
    12. 07:48 AM - Re: Ailerons and roll bars (Hinde, Frank George (Corvallis))
    13. 08:30 AM - Re: Ready to start project (LarryMcFarland)
    14. 08:46 AM - Re: Ready to start project (Hinde, Frank George (Corvallis))
    15. 08:46 AM - Re: Rivets (Testing) (Jon Croke)
    16. 08:47 AM - Re: Rivets (Testing) (Jon Croke)
    17. 09:59 AM - Roll bar (Ricchardd@aol.com)
    18. 01:46 PM - Re: Ready to start project (kevinbonds)
    19. 01:58 PM - Re: Ready to start project (Craig Payne)
    20. 02:01 PM - Re: 601-HDS For Sale Amazing Opportunity (kevin-jones)
    21. 03:26 PM - Re: Ailerons and roll bars (Bill+Rose)
    22. 03:59 PM - 801 (Dave Ruddiman)
    23. 04:49 PM - Re: 801 (LarryMcFarland)
    24. 05:07 PM - Re: Ailerons and roll bars (Hinde, Frank George (Corvallis))
    25. 05:22 PM - XL with Jabiru Gascolater Question (Chuck & Lana Maggart)
    26. 07:42 PM - Re: Ailerons and roll bars (Tim Juhl)
    27. 07:57 PM - Forming Nose Splice 7A2-3 (doug kandle)
    28. 08:12 PM - CH-701 wing bottom trailing edge skin trimming at wingtip (Rory Davis)
    29. 10:11 PM - Re: Forming Nose Splice 7A2-3 (Mike Sinclair)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:43:03 AM PST US
    From: "Clive Richards" <stephen@crichards.flyer.co.uk>
    Subject: Email address for builder N447WB
    --> Zenith-List message posted by: "Clive Richards" <stephen@crichards.flyer.co.uk> Hi List Has any one on the list a new email address for Ed Welander builder of N447WB FAA Web site says it was exported to New Zealand Ray has used Eds canopy latch design & woud like to contact him to confirm he has had no problems as we are trying to get our PFA to clear Rays aircraft for flight. Clive Richards for Ray Lasnier G CBDG wating Permit to test from PFA.


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:43:03 AM PST US
    From: "Dave G." <d.goddard@ns.sympatico.ca>
    Subject: Re: Ready to start project
    --> Zenith-List message posted by: "Dave G." <d.goddard@ns.sympatico.ca> What are the differences between the new XL and the HD or even the 601 UL for that matter? I've looked at the site but there is not a direct comparison on construction.


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:12:19 AM PST US
    From: "Jean-Paul Roy" <jean-paul.roy4@tlb.sympatico.ca>
    Subject: Rivet sources
    --> Zenith-List message posted by: "Jean-Paul Roy" <jean-paul.roy4@tlb.sympatico.ca> If I may add to the infos provided by cdgoose yesterday about Avdel rivets, I found a post on another list with more details: Avdel Division of Textron Canada Limited 87 Disco Road Rexdale, Ontario M9W 1M3 Telephone: 1-800-268-9947 or (416) 679-0622 Facsimile: 1-800-594-7661 or (416) 679-0678 sales@avdeltextron.ca You will need the part numbers: A4 (1/8") 01604-00412 A5 (5/32") 01604-00514 prices for 1000: A4 CDN$46.32 A5 CDN$56.10 Hope this helps Jean-Paul


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:17:38 AM PST US
    From: "Bob Unternaehrer" <shilocom@mcmsys.com>
    Subject: Re: Ready to start project
    --> Zenith-List message posted by: "Bob Unternaehrer" <shilocom@mcmsys.com> I think it's about looks you prefer and speed. Bob U. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jimbo" <jimandmandy@yahoo.com> Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 10:12 PM Subject: Zenith-List: Ready to start project > --> Zenith-List message posted by: Jimbo <jimandmandy@yahoo.com> > > Hello, > > Ive been lurking here a while and notice alomost all > the current projects are 601XLs. I got a demo flight > in the factory one at Camarillo last year. I was also > given a demo flight in a Jabiru 3300 powered Sonex > taildragger by one of the members of my EAA chapter, > 96 at CPM. I am a 200hr private pilot, most time in > 152's and some in the Katana. From that experience and > for other reasons, I will not own a Rotax engine. > > The bottom line is that after much study I am ready to > buy plans for the tri-gear 601HD and my current engine > choice is Corvair. Is anyone else here building or > flying this same combination? > > Sonex - best performance for the buck, but not as > comfortable or stable for long flights or insurable > (per Avemco). > > 601XL - More complex, heavier and more costly. > > 601HD - Just right. > > Before I order plans, opinions from this group, > please. > > Jim > > > > > > > > > > > > >


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:03:27 AM PST US
    From: William Dominguez <bill_dom@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Ready to start project
    --> Zenith-List message posted by: William Dominguez <bill_dom@yahoo.com> Jimbo, First off all welcome. Im in the first stages of plans building. I had the same dilemmas that you have before I decided to order the 601XL plans. I favored the XL over the HD because of the following reasons. - The XL have better performance. - While the HD might be easier to attach and remove wings, both of them are laborious enough to make it impractical trailering every time you are going to fly. Ive decided to bring the plane home only once a year during hurricane season for protection, maintenance and check up. None of them are difficult enough for Occasional trailering. The flaps are not difficult to connect, check some of the builder web sites and you will see that no tool is required to connect the flaps. - Header tank make for easy wing removal and reattachment but wing tank are safer. Im uneasy to the idea of a gasoline tank over my feet. - There is not much difference in complexity during building, the only difference will come when making your wing rear ribs, in the HD you will use one set of bending blocks while in the XL you will need 9. - Im 6 with disproportional long legs, the XL have better leg room. - Not a strong reason but the XL looks better. For a while I though that I was going to go with the HD, I dont regret changing my mind to the XL. William Dominguez Plansbuilt 601XL --- Jimbo <jimandmandy@yahoo.com> wrote: > --> Zenith-List message posted by: Jimbo > <jimandmandy@yahoo.com> > > > --- Craig Payne <craig@craigandjean.com> wrote: > > > --> Zenith-List message posted by: "Craig Payne" > > <craig@craigandjean.com> > > > > > > > BTW - I thought the HDS was an "improved" HD. What > > made you choose one over > > the other? > > > > -- Craig > > > The HDS model is not LSA due to the higher speeds, > top > and stall. I think the XL has flaps because of the > slight taper and different airfoil. Wing tanks and > flaps I want to avoid to make trailering the > aircraft > more practical due to fewer things to connect and > disconnect. I am concerned a little about fuel CG > with > the header tank, but a Corvair is supposed to be no > heavier than a Rotax or Subaru. > > Jim > > > > > browse > Subscriptions page, > FAQ, > http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List > > Admin. > > > > > > > > > > >


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:19:33 AM PST US
    From: "B Johnson" <bjohnson@satx.rr.com>
    Subject: Ready to start project
    --> Zenith-List message posted by: "B Johnson" <bjohnson@satx.rr.com> Randy Stout in San Antonio has an HD with a Corvair: http://www.geocities.com/r5t0ut21/ His numbers are (with pilot only) "Top Speed 122mph (that's just over 100 knots) Cruise speed 107mph (that's a dismal 93knots, my buddie's Taylorcraft cruises at that) Check out Randy's web page and see if you can contact him directly. He also participates in the matronics Corvair list if you can't get him any other way. The Sonex is considerably faster, but you're quite right about the cross country comfort level (IMHO). As far as the Sonex being insurable, there are over 110 flying and yea you can get insurance at a reasonable price, (but NOT if you put a Corvair in it..) The XL is the "updated" design of the Zodiac family, you will get "real" LSA performance out of the XL (not Taylorcraft performance). Yes it is a bit more complicated to build with the flaps and wing tanks, but it's quite worth it.. Your resale value will be higher. (Between being the more "updated" design, and the fact that you will get some interest from people looking at buying factory new xls for $85-100K). On those long cross countries you were concerned about, you will arrive 25% faster (at least). And the extra complexity of the wingtanks/flaps will be offset by all the work that William Wynne has been, and continues to do on the Corvair/XL combo to make it a complete FWF "drop in" package, where a lot of the engineering for the HD you will have to do yourself (OK, it's not THAT different, but still). Also I assume, since you are looking at the Corvair you've read all of WW's web page? www.flycorvair.com Short answer: build the XL you'll be MUCH happier in the end.... -Bruce Johnson Scratch building a Sonex near San Antonio,TX but the XL was VERY close on my short list. > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-zenith-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-zenith-list- > server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jimbo > Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 10:12 PM > To: zenith-list@matronics.com > Subject: Zenith-List: Ready to start project > > --> Zenith-List message posted by: Jimbo <jimandmandy@yahoo.com> > > Hello, > > Ive been lurking here a while and notice alomost all > the current projects are 601XLs. I got a demo flight > in the factory one at Camarillo last year. I was also > given a demo flight in a Jabiru 3300 powered Sonex > taildragger by one of the members of my EAA chapter, > 96 at CPM. I am a 200hr private pilot, most time in > 152's and some in the Katana. From that experience and > for other reasons, I will not own a Rotax engine. > > The bottom line is that after much study I am ready to > buy plans for the tri-gear 601HD and my current engine > choice is Corvair. Is anyone else here building or > flying this same combination? > > Sonex - best performance for the buck, but not as > comfortable or stable for long flights or insurable > (per Avemco). > > 601XL - More complex, heavier and more costly. > > 601HD - Just right. > > Before I order plans, opinions from this group, > please. > > Jim > --


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:00:08 AM PST US
    From: "Jeff Davidson" <jeffrey_davidson@earthlink.net>
    Subject: Ready to start project
    --> Zenith-List message posted by: "Jeff Davidson" <jeffrey_davidson@earthlink.net> William Dominguez wrote: First off all welcome. Im in the first stages of plans building. I had the same dilemmas that you have before I decided to order the 601XL plans. I favored the XL over the HD because of the following reasons. <snip> - Header tank make for easy wing removal and reattachment but wing tank are safer. Im uneasy to the idea of a gasoline tank over my feet. - There is not much difference in complexity during building, the only difference will come when making your wing rear ribs, in the HD you will use one set of bending blocks while in the XL you will need 9. <snip> On the header tank question, leading edge wing tanks to fit the HD wings are an available option. I have that option and my fuel system is close to the newer XL fuel system available on the ZAC site. On the complexity item, the HD gear boxes have been considered a difficult part of the HD to build over the years. I built my boxes some time ago and have recently installed the gear legs and the bungee cords. Despite all the discussion, I found it to be less of a problem that I expected. Getting the bolts into the confined space was frustrating, but only for a couple hours. In fact, I took it apart and put it back together without a real problem. I did benefit from all the suggestions available on the list for it. And as far as the canopy is concerned, I simply ordered the front hinged XL canopy as opposed to the side opening canopy. I preferred the HD over the HDS because the stall speed is lower and meets the LSA requirements. Neither the HD or the HDS are fast aircraft. Jeff Davidson 601 HD Jab 3300A


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:38:04 AM PST US
    From: "Kelly Meiste" <kellymeiste@jcwifi.com>
    Subject: Re: Ailerons and roll bars
    --> Zenith-List message posted by: "Kelly Meiste" <kellymeiste@jcwifi.com> My FAA airworthiness inspector told me as he was inspecting my plane (in 2002) that he was recently asked to investigate a fatal accident involving a 601. I believe he said it was in FL were a 601 nosed over after landing (think it went off the runway), killing the pilot. He was asking me if Zenith has since added any type of roll over protection. Sadly I had to tell him no. Kelly Meiste 601 HD ----- Original Message ----- From: "Craig Payne" <craig@craigandjean.com> Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 7:15 PM Subject: RE: Zenith-List: Ailerons and roll bars > --> Zenith-List message posted by: "Craig Payne" <craig@craigandjean.com> > > "The only Zenith I've seen inverted was one that was tied down outside in > really bad weather." > > http://www.ch601.org/stories.htm > > -- Craig > > >


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:38:05 AM PST US
    From: Ron Butterfield <rbutterfield@mebtel.net>
    Subject: Re: Ready to start project
    Cc: d.goddard@ns.sympatico.ca --> Zenith-List message posted by: Ron Butterfield <rbutterfield@mebtel.net> At 05:38 AM 3/24/06, dgoddard wrote: >What are the differences between the new XL and the HD or even the 601 UL >for that matter? I've looked at the site but there is not a direct >comparison on construction. Here is a comparison: www.zenithair.com/zodiac/xl/xl-compare.html The HD is the original design. Straight stub wings, and the relatively thick wing chord is constant all the way out. www.zenithair.com/zodiac/601-hd.html The HDS has as it's only difference shorter, tapered outer wings. This increases both the stall and the top speed. www.zenithair.com/zodiac/601-hds.html The UL was designed to meet the European and Canadian restriction for Advanced Ultralight (gross under 480 kg etc). It has slightly lighter construction than the HD, but is otherwise identical. www.zenithair.com/zodiac/601-ul.html The XL was designed within the limitations of the Sport Pilot category, to be as much plane as possible and still fit the requirements. Among the changes are a different (thinner) slightly tapered wing section, full-length wing panels (no stub wings), some heavier construction for the higher gross, and spring main gear instead of bungee. www.zenithair.com/zodiac/xl/index.html (all below figures with 100hp) HD- gross-1200 stall@1050-44 cruise-120 HDS- gross-1200 stall@1050-54 cruise-135 UL- gross-1058 stall@1050-44 cruise-120 XL- gross-1300 stall@1300-44 cruise-134 Bottom line, if you want to go somewhere and take something with you, the XL is probably the best choice. Otherwise, whatever best fits your specific requirements. Regards, RonB


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:38:05 AM PST US
    Subject: Ready to start project
    From: "Hinde, Frank George (Corvallis)" <frank.hinde@hp.com>
    --> Zenith-List message posted by: "Hinde, Frank George (Corvallis)" <frank.hinde@hp.com> Hello Jim, First off check out the insurance costs...I did'nt and got a nasty surprise when I found that for a while the Subaru conversions were almost uninsurable!...Now we have found ram Performance who can stop the valve guides falling out of the heads these insurance issues have gone away. Not saying the Corvair is a bad choice just make sure you know what you are getting into. Your engine comment is interesting about not owning a Rotax...Why not? It has prven itself to be the most relaible engine out there, not that others are bad...Jabaru I don't think has the same track record, Subarus were a disaster to be quite honest until the builders finally engineered the package properly...(It's a great and cheapish engine now..Ram Performance is the only one I would purchase) and the Corvair conversion does not have the track record either. Really if your trying to stick to what you know I would build an airplane with an o235, 320 or 360 Lycoming....A Corvair may kinda look like these engines but its not the same...Once again not saying its bad...Just not the same. While we are on the subject, have you flown the RV-9(a)? Quite a bit faster and about the same cost (Ok I'm guessing here a little) as long as you compare apples to apples..i.e with an o235 in both airplanes. And the insurance cost would be an interesting comparison. The RV-9 is not a SP airplane of course. Frank 601 HDS 393 hours -----Original Message----- From: owner-zenith-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-zenith-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jimbo Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 8:12 PM Subject: Zenith-List: Ready to start project --> Zenith-List message posted by: Jimbo <jimandmandy@yahoo.com> Hello, Ive been lurking here a while and notice alomost all the current projects are 601XLs. I got a demo flight in the factory one at Camarillo last year. I was also given a demo flight in a Jabiru 3300 powered Sonex taildragger by one of the members of my EAA chapter, 96 at CPM. I am a 200hr private pilot, most time in 152's and some in the Katana. From that experience and for other reasons, I will not own a Rotax engine. The bottom line is that after much study I am ready to buy plans for the tri-gear 601HD and my current engine choice is Corvair. Is anyone else here building or flying this same combination? Sonex - best performance for the buck, but not as comfortable or stable for long flights or insurable (per Avemco). 601XL - More complex, heavier and more costly. 601HD - Just right. Before I order plans, opinions from this group, please. Jim


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:39:28 AM PST US
    From: Kevin Kinney <kkinney@fuse.net>
    Subject: Re: Ready to start project
    --> Zenith-List message posted by: Kevin Kinney <kkinney@fuse.net> Jim, like you, I decided to build an HD. The reason at that time was the XL was just too new. Or so I thought. That changed once I went to the factory rudder workshop. In speaking with Sebastian, I was told the XL was just an HD with all the HD optional equipment designed in. In other words, if you were to take an HD, add 2 axis trim (I recommend this in any 601xx), leading edge gas tanks, top opening canopy, flaps & the spring gear, you'd end up with an XL. (That made it an incremental improvement rather than a new design. That solve my concern about it being too new.) I was skeptical, so I looked at that statement with a critical eye. It was essentially true. I went with the XL. (OK, the 601xx wing is drag-ish, so the flaps *may* be overkill, but it's nice to have them, just in case...) But don't take my word for it. Look at all the HD options and compare for yourself. In addition, instead of a 16 gallon header tank, you can now get a 15 gallon tank in each wing. And as Paul has pointed out, you are the only one who knows your requirements. That should really be your overriding concern. Regards, Kevin Kinney P.S. Eventually you will be concerned about the "heavy left wing." There's a simple & effective solution to this. Simply move the pilots seat slightly to the righ so you straddle the aileron torque tube. You *will* lose one seat out of your airplane, but you'll have a VERY roomy cockpit.


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:48:29 AM PST US
    Subject: Ailerons and roll bars
    From: "Hinde, Frank George (Corvallis)" <frank.hinde@hp.com>
    --> Zenith-List message posted by: "Hinde, Frank George (Corvallis)" <frank.hinde@hp.com> Mine has been inverted several times...But never on the ground....:) Frank Do not archive -----Original Message----- From: owner-zenith-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-zenith-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Craig Payne Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 5:16 PM Subject: RE: Zenith-List: Ailerons and roll bars --> Zenith-List message posted by: "Craig Payne" --> <craig@craigandjean.com> "The only Zenith I've seen inverted was one that was tied down outside in really bad weather." http://www.ch601.org/stories.htm -- Craig


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:30:28 AM PST US
    From: LarryMcFarland <larry@macsmachine.com>
    Subject: Re: Ready to start project
    --> Zenith-List message posted by: LarryMcFarland <larry@macsmachine.com> Jim, LSA performance guidelines can be met by the HDS if it is built correctly. The first HDS to be evaluated in this context was determined not to meet stall requirements. Since then, several HDS builders have found that they do meet the stall requirements and have documented it. Zenith also agrees that it is a plane by plane assesment during testing. The FAA inspector of my aircraft concluded that my 601HDS was compliant, does in fact meet this standard and it's recorded in my POH. It's only because it's very close margin that this is question naturally comes up. It will never be a LSA in the manufacturer's context, but a sport pilot can fly it. Larry McFarland - 601HDS at www.macsmachine.com > >The HDS model is not LSA due to the higher speeds, top >and stall. I think the XL has flaps because of the >slight taper and different airfoil. Wing tanks and >flaps I want to avoid to make trailering the aircraft >more practical due to fewer things to connect and >disconnect. I am concerned a little about fuel CG with >the header tank, but a Corvair is supposed to be no >heavier than a Rotax or Subaru. > >Jim > > > > > > > >


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:46:39 AM PST US
    Subject: Ready to start project
    From: "Hinde, Frank George (Corvallis)" <frank.hinde@hp.com>
    --> Zenith-List message posted by: "Hinde, Frank George (Corvallis)" <frank.hinde@hp.com> Completed my HDS stall testing at gross weight two nights ago and indeed it fits within SP requirements...its close but its in! Frank 601HDS stall @ 50.6mph CAS Do not archive -----Original Message----- From: owner-zenith-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-zenith-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of LarryMcFarland Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 8:26 AM Subject: Re: Zenith-List: Ready to start project --> Zenith-List message posted by: LarryMcFarland --> <larry@macsmachine.com> Jim, LSA performance guidelines can be met by the HDS if it is built correctly. The first HDS to be evaluated in this context was determined not to meet stall requirements. Since then, several HDS builders have found that they do meet the stall requirements and have documented it. Zenith also agrees that it is a plane by plane assesment during testing. The FAA inspector of my aircraft concluded that my 601HDS was compliant, does in fact meet this standard and it's recorded in my POH. It's only because it's very close margin that this is question naturally comes up. It will never be a LSA in the manufacturer's context, but a sport pilot can fly it. Larry McFarland - 601HDS at www.macsmachine.com > >The HDS model is not LSA due to the higher speeds, top and stall. I >think the XL has flaps because of the slight taper and different >airfoil. Wing tanks and flaps I want to avoid to make trailering the >aircraft more practical due to fewer things to connect and disconnect. >I am concerned a little about fuel CG with the header tank, but a >Corvair is supposed to be no heavier than a Rotax or Subaru. > >Jim > > > > > > > >


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:46:39 AM PST US
    From: "Jon Croke" <jon@joncroke.com>
    Subject: Re: Rivets (Testing)
    --> Zenith-List message posted by: "Jon Croke" <jon@joncroke.com> Scott, I want to send you a copy of the Scratch Building Basics starring David and Mark.. I need your mail address! SUPER that you are going to make it to Sun n Fun... am looking forward to meeting you. I still want to get YOU into 'movies' someday... we can talk about this, too! Thanks Jon


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:47:24 AM PST US
    From: "Jon Croke" <jon@joncroke.com>
    Subject: Re: Rivets (Testing)
    --> Zenith-List message posted by: "Jon Croke" <jon@joncroke.com> Sorry everyone, hit the send key too soon! Do not archive ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jon Croke" <jon@joncroke.com> Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 10:45 AM Subject: Re: Zenith-List: Rivets (Testing) > Scott, > >


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:59:21 AM PST US
    From: Ricchardd@aol.com
    Subject: Roll bar
    --> Zenith-List message posted by: Ricchardd@aol.com I really think too much is being worried about upsets. In a past life I had the unfortunate experience of parking a PT22 (open cockpit WW2 monoplane trainer) upside down in a cow pasture. The only thing between my head and the grass was my hat. The only damage was caused by the glare shield, none from ground. I don't think a roll bar would be worth the effort. just my $0.02 Richard


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:46:06 PM PST US
    From: "kevinbonds" <kevinbonds@comcast.net>
    Subject: Ready to start project
    --> Zenith-List message posted by: "kevinbonds" <kevinbonds@comcast.net> Some of Zenith's literature, as I remember, remarked that the XL is the easiest of them all to build. People assume the tapered wing is a big a deal but it's really not. I don't know much about the HD but, a guy I did the workshop with was planning on going with the HD because of more useful load (he's a big guy) seems I remember Nick or Sebastian reiterating that the XL is easier to build (not sure the difference between kit and plans on this). Also The Corvair tends to be a little heavier than the Rotax, Jab etc. and the XL can have installed weight up to 300 pounds. The HD has max 265lbs FWF (including header tank) Also doesn't the XL have larger fuel capacity (30 gal--all in the wing) with or without the header tank. Don't discount the XL just because of a perceived degree of complexity. I would ask the factory about this to clarify. I think the XL being a newer design accounts for the ease of its construction--especially now that we have gone to .025 on the fuse skins (we no longer need all those gussets). Just stuff to think about--It is a hard decision. Kevin Bonds Nashville TN 601XL Corvair powered; Plans building. Empennage done; working on wings and engine. http://home.comcast.net/~kevinbonds do not archive DO NOT ARCHIVE -----Original Message----- From: owner-zenith-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-zenith-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jimbo Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 10:12 PM Subject: Zenith-List: Ready to start project --> Zenith-List message posted by: Jimbo <jimandmandy@yahoo.com> Hello, Ive been lurking here a while and notice alomost all the current projects are 601XLs. I got a demo flight in the factory one at Camarillo last year. I was also given a demo flight in a Jabiru 3300 powered Sonex taildragger by one of the members of my EAA chapter, 96 at CPM. I am a 200hr private pilot, most time in 152's and some in the Katana. From that experience and for other reasons, I will not own a Rotax engine. The bottom line is that after much study I am ready to buy plans for the tri-gear 601HD and my current engine choice is Corvair. Is anyone else here building or flying this same combination? Sonex - best performance for the buck, but not as comfortable or stable for long flights or insurable (per Avemco). 601XL - More complex, heavier and more costly. 601HD - Just right. Before I order plans, opinions from this group, please. Jim


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:58:33 PM PST US
    From: "Craig Payne" <craig@craigandjean.com>
    Subject: Ready to start project
    --> Zenith-List message posted by: "Craig Payne" <craig@craigandjean.com> I bet poor Jim wishes he never went public with his choice: he is either getting annoyed with all the second-guessing or wondering if he made the right choice. ;-) -- Craig


    Message 20


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:01:54 PM PST US
    From: "kevin-jones" <kevin-jones@snet.net>
    Subject: Re: 601-HDS For Sale Amazing Opportunity
    --> Zenith-List message posted by: "kevin-jones" <kevin-jones@snet.net> Steve, How did the sale come out? kevin jones ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Freeman" <stefree601@yahoo.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 10:41 AM Subject: Re: Zenith-List: 601-HDS For Sale Amazing Opportunity > --> Zenith-List message posted by: Steve Freeman <stefree601@yahoo.com> > > Hi Michel, > > Thank you for your kind words. This is not an easy decision on the > emotional or financial side of the balance sheet. But life changes and we > have to roll with it. I didn't think anyone remembered the web site! > > Blue skys and wind at your tail! > > Thanks, > > Steve > > Michel Therrien <mtherr@yahoo.com> wrote: > --> Zenith-List message posted by: Michel Therrien > > There are days when we have good news such as a new > "first flight" and there are days we get messages like > this one. I just saw this this morning. > > Steve, when I started my project, your involvement, > through your web site was a source of inspiration and > profound help for me. I was consulting your web > site every day and your construction log was > invaluable. > > I am sorry that you have to abandon this project. > > Regards, > > Michel > do not archive > > --- Steve Freeman wrote: >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Steve Freeman" >> To: >> Subject: Zenith-List: 601-HDS For Sale Amazing >> Opportunity >> >> >> > --> Zenith-List message posted by: Steve Freeman >> > >> > >> > Hi List, >> > >> > I have been quiet for quite some time as life has >> just gotten too crazy, >> with a return to school (MBA) kids and work. To top >> it off I have just >> received a job offer that will be forcing me to >> relocate from Phoenix, >> Arizona to San Diego, California. >> > >> > Because of this, and the speed with which all of >> this is going to happen, >> I am offering up my 90% completed 601-hds, WITH > > >


    Message 21


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:26:04 PM PST US
    From: "Bill+Rose" <naumuk@alltel.net>
    Subject: Re: Ailerons and roll bars
    --> Zenith-List message posted by: "Bill+Rose" <naumuk@alltel.net> Frank- I can appreciate that. Mine's upside down right now! Maybe it's a phobia I have because in my flying life, (Many moons) I've never flown a low wing. Need the rafters in the ceiling, you know. Consider that fair warning. If I ever get this thing in the air, stay away from Pennsylvania for about 40 hrs!!!!!!!!!! Bill P.S. At the rate I'm going, you'd better warn your great-great grandkids. Do Not Archive ----- Original Message ----- From: "Hinde, Frank George (Corvallis)" <frank.hinde@hp.com> Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 10:46 AM Subject: RE: Zenith-List: Ailerons and roll bars > --> Zenith-List message posted by: "Hinde, Frank George (Corvallis)" > <frank.hinde@hp.com> > > Mine has been inverted several times...But never on the ground....:) > > Frank > > Do not archive > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-zenith-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-zenith-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Craig Payne > Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 5:16 PM > To: zenith-list@matronics.com > Subject: RE: Zenith-List: Ailerons and roll bars > > --> Zenith-List message posted by: "Craig Payne" > --> <craig@craigandjean.com> > > "The only Zenith I've seen inverted was one that was tied down outside > in really bad weather." > > http://www.ch601.org/stories.htm > > -- Craig > > >


    Message 22


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:59:04 PM PST US
    From: "Dave Ruddiman" <pacificpainting@comcast.net>
    Subject: 801
    --> Zenith-List message posted by: "Dave Ruddiman" <pacificpainting@comcast.net> I just signed up for this list since I am beginning to build a CH801. Am I in the right place? Seems like most of the info is about 601's. Hmmmmmmmmm, maybe 801 builders don't need any help. Dave in Salem


    Message 23


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:49:57 PM PST US
    From: LarryMcFarland <larry@macsmachine.com>
    Subject: Re: 801
    --> Zenith-List message posted by: LarryMcFarland <larry@macsmachine.com> Dave, Welcome aboard. We don't hear nearly enough from the 801 builders or questions they might ask. Perhaps it's because the drawings are better or the people building them are better at it. Don't know! There have been some superb 801s built and a very few got bent. The problems are much the same though with Zenith aircraft. You're in the right place Just comment or ask a question and see what happens. Best regards, Larry McFarland - 601HDS at www.macsmachine.com do not archive Dave Ruddiman wrote: >--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Dave Ruddiman" <pacificpainting@comcast.net> > >I just signed up for this list since I am beginning to build a CH801. Am I in the right place? Seems like most of the info is about 601's. Hmmmmmmmmm, maybe 801 builders don't need any help. > >Dave in Salem > > > > > > > > >


    Message 24


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:07:24 PM PST US
    Subject: Ailerons and roll bars
    From: "Hinde, Frank George (Corvallis)" <frank.hinde@hp.com>
    --> Zenith-List message posted by: "Hinde, Frank George (Corvallis)" <frank.hinde@hp.com> Just keep pulling those rivets Bill it will get there!...Of course on the RV list that translates into POUNDING rivets....:) Oh yeas and the 601 will roll quite well...:) Frank Do not archive -----Original Message----- From: owner-zenith-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-zenith-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Bill+Rose Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 3:19 PM Subject: Re: Zenith-List: Ailerons and roll bars --> Zenith-List message posted by: "Bill+Rose" <naumuk@alltel.net> Frank- I can appreciate that. Mine's upside down right now! Maybe it's a phobia I have because in my flying life, (Many moons) I've never flown a low wing. Need the rafters in the ceiling, you know. Consider that fair warning. If I ever get this thing in the air, stay away from Pennsylvania for about 40 hrs!!!!!!!!!! Bill P.S. At the rate I'm going, you'd better warn your great-great grandkids. Do Not Archive ----- Original Message ----- From: "Hinde, Frank George (Corvallis)" <frank.hinde@hp.com> Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 10:46 AM Subject: RE: Zenith-List: Ailerons and roll bars > --> Zenith-List message posted by: "Hinde, Frank George (Corvallis)" > <frank.hinde@hp.com> > > Mine has been inverted several times...But never on the ground....:) > > Frank > > Do not archive > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-zenith-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-zenith-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Craig > Payne > Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 5:16 PM > To: zenith-list@matronics.com > Subject: RE: Zenith-List: Ailerons and roll bars > > --> Zenith-List message posted by: "Craig Payne" > --> <craig@craigandjean.com> > > "The only Zenith I've seen inverted was one that was tied down outside > in really bad weather." > > http://www.ch601.org/stories.htm > > -- Craig > > >


    Message 25


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:22:21 PM PST US
    From: "Chuck & Lana Maggart" <cmaggart@sprintmail.com>
    Subject: XL with Jabiru Gascolater Question
    --> Zenith-List message posted by: "Chuck & Lana Maggart" <cmaggart@sprintmail.com> I would like to locate the gascolater on my Jabiru powered XL forward of the firewall. I don't have the engine installed yet and am not sure what space is available. I have photos of the battery and airbox installations, but they don't really show that portion of the lower firewall very clearly. Another concern is the muffler and exhaust pipes. Where have you all been installing the gascolater? Chuck Maggart, XL/Jabiru installing instruments and fuel system


    Message 26


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:42:54 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Ailerons and roll bars
    From: "Tim Juhl" <juhl@avci.net>
    --> Zenith-List message posted by: "Tim Juhl" <juhl@avci.net> The discussion of the crash-worthiness of the 601 series got me thinking so I checked the AOPA accident database. I only listed accidents involving death or injury - there are others listed on the site where there was damage only. Visit: http://www.aopa.org/asf/ntsb/search_ntsb.cfm --------------- The recent fatal crash in CA when a wing folded A fatal midair in NY MA - Fatal crash when pilot lost control on first flight IN - Fatal crash when AC flew into a radio tower OH - Fatal stall / spin in the traffic pattern. CG slightly aft of rear limit. TX - Fatal stall / spin complicated by loss of engine power IL -Minor injuries when the canopy of an HD opened on takeoff and the pilot nosed it over in a pond adjacent the runway. WA - Serious injuries when engine failed after water takeoff and AC crashed into trees. NC - Serious injury when a radiator burst on takeoff filling the cockpit with smoke and blinding the pilot causing him to crash into trees. WA - Minor injuries when wake turbulence caused the aircraft to roll on takeoff with the result that a wing struck the runway. FL - Minor injuries when engine quit and aircraft flipped after landing in a muddy field. UT - Minor injuries following engine failure. The reports make interesting reading. Tim Juhl -------- CFII Champ L16A flying Zodiac XL - awaiting kit Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=24072#24072


    Message 27


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:57:02 PM PST US
    From: doug kandle <d_kandle@velocitus.net>
    Subject: Forming Nose Splice 7A2-3
    --> Zenith-List message posted by: doug kandle <d_kandle@velocitus.net> Did anyone have an easy way to form the flaperon nose splice (7A2-3). In the kit the part is just a plate that needs to be shaped to match the leading edge of the flaperons. Doug Kandle CH701 Boise ID Rudder & Horiz. Stab. Wings Done Working on Slats & Flaperons Jabiru 2200 From complete kit


    Message 28


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:12:35 PM PST US
    From: Rory Davis <n7cr@bellsouth.net>
    Subject: CH-701 wing bottom trailing edge skin trimming at wingtip
    --> Zenith-List message posted by: Rory Davis <n7cr@bellsouth.net> Question regarding trimming - The 7V7-4 drawing shows the TE skin outboard edge trimmed back 35mm at the rear channel at an angle, while the 7V9 rear skins wing tip trimming table has the aft edge of the bottom skin 370mm from the centerline of rib #6. 7V7-4 has the distance of the edge from the centerline of rib #6 as: 1620 (length of TE skin) - 1200 (distance to inboard side of rib #6 -10 (centerline of rib #6) -35 ------ = 375 mm. That's a 5mm difference, which is what I'm measuring. The question is, do I continue the straight line on 757-3 detailed on the table on page 7V9 all the way to the trailing edge, or do I maintain the total TE skin aft measurement (1620mm) and trim back the fwd edge of the TE skin by 40mm? Rory CH-701SP kit Lacombe, LA


    Message 29


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:11:39 PM PST US
    From: Mike Sinclair <mike.sinclair@ATT.NET>
    Subject: Re: Forming Nose Splice 7A2-3
    --> Zenith-List message posted by: Mike Sinclair <mike.sinclair@att.net> Clamp a small diameter piece of pipe (or something similar) in a vise. Then just take the plate with one hand on either side and force it down. If I remember right, it's only .025 thick and forms real easy. Then minor bending to fit contour of the flaperon. Drill holes, rivet in place, and don't forget to scuff with "Green" scotchbrite. Mike Sinclair N701TD doug kandle wrote: > --> Zenith-List message posted by: doug kandle <d_kandle@velocitus.net> > > Did anyone have an easy way to form the flaperon nose splice > (7A2-3). In the kit the part is just a plate that needs to be shaped > to match the leading edge of the flaperons. > > Doug Kandle > CH701 > Boise ID > Rudder & Horiz. Stab. Wings Done > Working on Slats & Flaperons > Jabiru 2200 > From complete kit > >




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   zenith-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Zenith-List.htm
  • Full Archive Search Engine
  •   http://www.matronics.com/search
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/zenith-list
  • Browse Zenith-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/zenith-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contributions

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --