Zenith-List Digest Archive

Fri 12/14/07


Total Messages Posted: 30



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 06:27 AM - Re: Canopy Gas Struts (Springs) (rgeese)
     2. 07:48 AM - Re: Re: Canopy Gas Struts (Springs) (robert stone)
     3. 08:13 AM - Re: Re: Canopy Gas Struts (Springs) (Russell Lassetter)
     4. 09:17 AM - Re: Canopy Gas Struts (Springs) (japhillipsga@aol.com)
     5. 09:44 AM - Canopy Gas Struts (Springs) (Randy L. Thwing)
     6. 10:15 AM - Re: Canopy Gas Struts (Springs) (Jaybannist@cs.com)
     7. 10:39 AM - Re: Canopy Gas Struts (Springs) (Edward Moody II)
     8. 11:19 AM - Re: Metal Spinning (ashontz)
     9. 11:40 AM - Re: Bleeding brake lines (ashontz)
    10. 11:44 AM - Re: Enamel and gas. (ashontz)
    11. 11:50 AM - Re: Fuel Tank Filler Neck (ashontz)
    12. 04:15 PM - Main Spar Bolts and Holes (steve)
    13. 04:28 PM - Re: Main Spar Bolts and Holes (Craig Payne)
    14. 04:36 PM - Re: Main Spar Bolts and Holes (Bryan Martin)
    15. 04:51 PM - Re: Main Spar Bolts and Holes (papaniapatrick@aol.com)
    16. 05:09 PM - Re: Main Spar Bolts and Holes (Larry Winger)
    17. 05:27 PM - Re: Main Spar Bolts and Holes (steve)
    18. 05:39 PM - Re: Main Spar Bolts and Holes (george may)
    19. 06:04 PM - Re: Main Spar Bolts and Holes (Juan Vega)
    20. 06:21 PM - Re: Main Spar Bolts and Holes (JAPhillipsGA@aol.com)
    21. 07:32 PM - 601XL - Riveting HT Attachment Brackets (PatrickW)
    22. 07:43 PM - Re: 601XL - Riveting HT Attachment Brackets (Craig Payne)
    23. 08:05 PM - Re: Main Spar Bolts and Holes (Debo Cox)
    24. 08:25 PM - More on wing spar bolts/holes (steve)
    25. 08:35 PM - Re: Main Spar Bolts and Holes (Jeff)
    26. 08:47 PM - Re: Re: Avex Rivets (David Downey)
    27. 09:03 PM - Re: More on wing spar bolts/holes (Ron Lendon)
    28. 09:13 PM - Re: Main Spar Bolts and Holes (Ron Lendon)
    29. 09:16 PM - Re: 601XL-TD Question (David Downey)
    30. 09:33 PM - Re: Removing metal scratches on Rudder (David Downey)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:27:31 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Canopy Gas Struts (Springs)
    From: "rgeese" <rgeese1@columbus.rr.com>
    Good advice! Although I haven't completed installing my canopy, new springs are on order! Just a minor correction to Roberts original post. The McMaster-Carr stock number for the 60# springs is 9416K123, not 8416K123. Ron Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=152111#152111


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:48:49 AM PST US
    From: "robert stone" <rstone4@hot.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: Canopy Gas Struts (Springs)
    List Members, Ron is right as rain, I don't know how in the hell I failed to notice that I had one number wrong. My only excuse is age. The only thing good about getting old in Texas is my fishing license is free and I can blame all of my stupid errors on it. Sorry guys, from now on I will proof read everything I send out before I hit the send button. Bob Stone ----- Original Message ----- From: "rgeese" <rgeese1@columbus.rr.com> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 8:25 AM Subject: Zenith-List: Re: Canopy Gas Struts (Springs) > > Good advice! Although I haven't completed installing my canopy, new > springs are on order! > > Just a minor correction to Roberts original post. The McMaster-Carr stock > number for the 60# springs is 9416K123, not 8416K123. > > Ron > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=152111#152111 > > >


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:13:47 AM PST US
    From: "Russell Lassetter" <rblassett@alltel.net>
    Subject: Re: Canopy Gas Struts (Springs)
    Bob, Ingenious. Now that you have opened my eyes I too will blame my mistakes on my fishing license:-) I couldn't resist. Merry Christmas. Russ > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-zenith-list-server@matronics.com > [mailto:owner-zenith-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of robert stone > Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 10:45 AM > To: zenith-list@matronics.com > Subject: Re: Zenith-List: Re: Canopy Gas Struts (Springs) > > > > List Members, > Ron is right as rain, I don't know how in the hell I failed > to notice > that I had one number wrong. My only excuse is age. The only thing good > about getting old in Texas is my fishing license is free and I > can blame all > of my stupid errors on it. Sorry guys, from now on I will proof read > everything I send out before I hit the send button. > > Bob Stone > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "rgeese" <rgeese1@columbus.rr.com> > To: <zenith-list@matronics.com> > Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 8:25 AM > Subject: Zenith-List: Re: Canopy Gas Struts (Springs) > > > > > > Good advice! Although I haven't completed installing my canopy, new > > springs are on order! > > > > Just a minor correction to Roberts original post. The > McMaster-Carr stock > > number for the 60# springs is 9416K123, not 8416K123. > > > > Ron > > > > > > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=152111#152111 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:17:36 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Canopy Gas Struts (Springs)
    From: japhillipsga@aol.com
    Bob thanks for in info on the struts. I to have found the ZAC struts unable to hold the canopy forward in even just a lite breeze, but I really haven't looked to replace them. On the same subject, different plane, I am building an RV-8a as a big sister to my XL. The 8 has a baggage door on the forward side of the fuselage that would benefit from a lite strut (s). Would you consider a sale or trade for something for the struts you have excess? Let me know and thanks, Bill of Georgia -----Original Message----- From: robert stone <rstone4@hot.rr.com> Sent: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 2:27 pm Subject: Zenith-List: Canopy Gas Struts (Springs) ???? I found the canopy gas springs or struts were not strong enough to hold the canopy up even in a light breeze.? I inquired as to the strength of the struts furnished in the kit and found them to be 40 pounds.? I replaced them with a pair of 60 pounders and eliminated the problem of my canopy slamming down unexpected. ???? I am sure some of you who are building or have built the ZodiacXL either have the same problem or will have so here is the information on obtaining the stronger struts. McMasters & Company are the people Zenith Aircraft gets the struts from.? Their phone number is 630-833-0300.? The gas struts furnished by Zenith for the ZodiacXL are part number 9416K12 (40 Pound)? the stronger strut is part number 8416K123 (60 Pound)? The cost for two is $19.76, shipping is $5.00 for a total of $24.76.? They come without the attaching ends so you have to use your old ones however the old struts screw out and the new one screws in.? Very easy to change. ? Bob Stone Harker Heights, Tx. ZodiacXL w/Jabiru 3300 ??????? ?N4337G ? ________________________________________________________________________


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:44:22 AM PST US
    From: "Randy L. Thwing" <n4546v@mindspring.com>
    Subject: Canopy Gas Struts (Springs)
    Do not archive Clarification please. Do I understand correctly that in Texas all that's required to fly Light Sport Aircraft is a Fishing License? Would that be a Statewide or County license? Regards, Randy, Las Vegas <rblassett@alltel.net> > > Bob, > > Ingenious. Now that you have opened my eyes I too will blame my mistakes on > my fishing license:-) > > I couldn't resist. Merry Christmas.


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:15:03 AM PST US
    From: Jaybannist@cs.com
    Subject: Canopy Gas Struts (Springs)
    Randy, Come on! You know that merely BEING a Texan gives us license to do whatever we have the cajones to do. Sometimes we have to cow-tow to the Feds to stay out of the jusgow (jail), but we really don't need their permission to get the job done, fer sure. Jay in Dallas Definitely do not archive "Randy L. Thwing" <n4546v@mindspring.com> wrote: > >Do not archive > >Clarification please. > >Do I understand correctly that in Texas all that's required to fly Light >Sport Aircraft is a Fishing License? Would that be a Statewide or County >license? > >Regards, > >Randy, Las Vegas > > ><rblassett@alltel.net> >> >> Bob, >> >> Ingenious. Now that you have opened my eyes I too will blame my mistakes >on >> my fishing license:-) >> >> I couldn't resist. Merry Christmas. > >


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:39:58 AM PST US
    From: "Edward Moody II" <dredmoody@cox.net>
    Subject: Re: Canopy Gas Struts (Springs)
    In SW LA "License" and "Opportunity" are the same thing. Ed Do Not Archive Do Not Dare Me Either ----- Original Message ----- From: Jaybannist@cs.com To: zenith-list@matronics.com Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 12:05 PM Subject: RE: Zenith-List: Canopy Gas Struts (Springs) Randy, Come on! You know that merely BEING a Texan gives us license to do whatever we have the cajones to do. Sometimes we have to cow-tow to the Feds to stay out of the jusgow (jail), but we really don't need their permission to get the job done, fer sure. Jay in Dallas Definitely do not archive "Randy L. Thwing" <n4546v@mindspring.com> wrote: <n4546v@mindspring.com> > >Do not archive > >Clarification please. > >Do I understand correctly that in Texas all that's required to fly Light >Sport Aircraft is a Fishing License? Would that be a Statewide or County >license? > >Regards, > >Randy, Las Vegas > > ><rblassett@alltel.net> >> >> Bob, >> >> Ingenious. Now that you have opened my eyes I too will blame my mistakes >on >> my fishing license:-) >> >> I couldn't resist. Merry Christmas. > > > > > > -- 12/13/2007 9:15 AM


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:19:05 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Metal Spinning
    From: "ashontz" <ashontz@nbme.org>
    Yeah, looks way to hard, as is the restof the building. I'm just going to go ahead and order completed plane and then claim that I built it. LOL do not archive -------- Andy Shontz CH601XL - Corvair www.mykitlog.com/ashontz Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=152164#152164


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:40:22 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Bleeding brake lines
    From: "ashontz" <ashontz@nbme.org>
    I bought one of those vacuum pumps from Pep Boys for bleeding my PU truck clutch. Works great. -------- Andy Shontz CH601XL - Corvair www.mykitlog.com/ashontz Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=152173#152173


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:44:21 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Enamel and gas.
    From: "ashontz" <ashontz@nbme.org>
    Sounds dangerous at first, but actually enamel paint is pretty flamable on it's own, especially if it's thinned with paint thinner. Probably no more dangerous than regular painting. I'm assuming you're using a sprayer? [quote="lrm(at)skyhawg.com"]I decided to try the enamel and gas engine painting process that Great Planes recommends. Other than stinking I was very surprised. I went to scrape some of it off an area that was for a gasket and found it very difficult to remove. It makes me wonder why, how and if it would work on other bare aluminum like a primer. This stuff really stuck. Have any of you tried this? For those who don't know what I am talking about. Great Planes Aircraft recommends to those who wish to paint their engines (VW) that they use a mixture of oil based enamel mixed 50/50 with gasoline. Larry, www.SkyHawg.com, N1345L > [b] -------- Andy Shontz CH601XL - Corvair www.mykitlog.com/ashontz Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=152176#152176


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:50:24 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Fuel Tank Filler Neck
    From: "ashontz" <ashontz@nbme.org>
    Sweet looking fillers Ron. I like that. Do they have locks on them too? Ron Lendon wrote: > I bought mine directly from Zenith about a year ago > > SPRL-2-L-G/S FUEL CAP ASSMBLY $64.75 each. > M142 THREADED BUSHING 2-1/4" $11.60 each. > > After welding is was necessary to run a tap back through the welded ring. They also supplied that N/C other than the shipping back to them. It was actually a kit that included all the tools to fix the situation and directions also. > > They really are good people to deal with. > > Final result below. -------- Andy Shontz CH601XL - Corvair www.mykitlog.com/ashontz Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=152179#152179


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:15:36 PM PST US
    From: "steve" <notsew_evets@frontiernet.net>
    Subject: Main Spar Bolts and Holes
    OK builders here is one for you.... I m about to install my wings on the 601 XL QBK. The other night I wanted to see how tight the main spar bolts would fit into the wing spar ( factory drilled ) holes. Man O man, there is a lot of "slop" in the holes. I emailed Zenith and told them that I was concerned about this critical part. The first answer I got from Zenith was, " Some slop is needed to get the bolts in the holes ".... I disagreed.. Zenith asked me to measure the holes. I did. Used a caliper on the bolts and then the holes. I got a reading of .011.. Eleven thousandths.....difference. I m not a machinist but I aint totally stupit either. Then Zenith emailed and said that I need to increase the spar hole size to an AN-6. Thats 3/8 inch..... Since I m not into dying just yet I asked Zenith engineers to confirm the the AN 6 size is safe. I am worried about the metal removal on the spar. They did....Said that in no way will going to an AN 6 decrease the wing strength..... Sooooo, what I want to know from you builders is this: Tell us about your experience with the spar and bolts. Were yours tight ??? Sloppy ?? Steve W


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:28:46 PM PST US
    From: "Craig Payne" <craig@craigandjean.com>
    Subject: Main Spar Bolts and Holes
    When you enlarge the holes use an undersized drill and then a reamer. -- Craig


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:36:00 PM PST US
    From: Bryan Martin <bryanmmartin@comcast.net>
    Subject: Re: Main Spar Bolts and Holes
    My spar bolts fit very snug, no slop at all. On Dec 14, 2007, at 7:12 PM, steve wrote: > OK builders here is one for you.... > > I m about to install my wings on the 601 XL QBK. > The other night I wanted to see how tight the main spar bolts would > fit into the wing spar ( factory drilled ) holes. > Man O man, there is a lot of "slop" in the holes. > I emailed Zenith and told them that I was concerned about this > critical part. > The first answer I got from Zenith was, " Some slop is needed to get > the bolts in the holes ".... > I disagreed.. > Zenith asked me to measure the holes. I did. Used a caliper on the > bolts and then the holes. I got a reading of .011.. > Eleven thousandths.....difference. > I m not a machinist but I aint totally stupit either. > Then Zenith emailed and said that I need to increase the spar hole > size to an AN-6. Thats 3/8 inch..... > Since I m not into dying just yet I asked Zenith engineers to > confirm the the AN 6 size is safe. I am worried about the metal > removal on the spar. > They did....Said that in no way will going to an AN 6 decrease the > wing strength..... > Sooooo, what I want to know from you builders is this: Tell us > about your experience with the spar and bolts. Were yours tight ??? > Sloppy ?? > > Steve W > > -- Bryan Martin N61BM, CH 601 XL, RAM Subaru, Stratus redrive. do not archive.


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:51:40 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Main Spar Bolts and Holes
    From: papaniapatrick@aol.com
    I am building an XL, but it is not a quick build. My wing spar bolts are a tight fit into the holes. I fitted pins for the wing spars so that I could trial fit the wings during construction and fitting. There was absolutely no slop what so ever. -----Original Message----- From: steve <notsew_evets@frontiernet.net> Sent: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 7:12 pm Subject: Zenith-List: Main Spar Bolts and Holes OK builders here is one for you.... ? I m about to install my wings on the 601 XL QBK. The other night I wanted to see how tight the main spar bolts would fit into the wing spar ( factory drilled ) holes. Man O man, there is a lot of "slop" in the holes. I emailed Zenith and told them that I was concerned about this critical part. The first answer I got from Zenith was, " Some slop is needed to get the bolts in the holes ".... I disagreed.. Zenith asked me to measure the holes.? I did.? Used a caliper on the bolts and then the holes.? I got a reading of .011.. Eleven thousandths.....difference. I m not a machinist but I aint totally stupit either. Then Zenith emailed and said that I need to increase the spar hole size to an AN-6.? Thats 3/8 inch..... Since I m not into dying just yet I asked Zenith engineers to confirm the the AN 6 size is safe.? I am worried about the metal removal on the spar.?? They did....Said that in no way will going to an AN 6 decrease the wing strength..... Sooooo,? what I want to know from you builders is this:? Tell us about your experience with the spar and bolts.? Were yours tight ??? Sloppy ?? ? Steve W ? ________________________________________________________________________


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:09:10 PM PST US
    From: "Larry Winger" <larrywinger@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Main Spar Bolts and Holes
    I scratch built my spars and worked for many, many hours to insure that there was no slop in the bolt/bolt hole interface. If I had known it was allowed, I could have relaxed more (insert goofy looking smiley face here). Larry Winger 601XL/Corvair Tustin, CA


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:27:15 PM PST US
    From: "steve" <notsew_evets@frontiernet.net>
    Subject: Re: Main Spar Bolts and Holes
    Larry, it may be allowed but I m not pleased with slop. Not sure but rumor has it that a 601 lost a wing. Anyone know if thats true ? So thats why I m not happy with loose bolts. SW ----- Original Message ----- From: Larry Winger To: zenith-list@matronics.com Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 6:05 PM Subject: Re: Zenith-List: Main Spar Bolts and Holes I scratch built my spars and worked for many, many hours to insure that there was no slop in the bolt/bolt hole interface. If I had known it was allowed, I could have relaxed more (insert goofy looking smiley face here). Larry Winger 601XL/Corvair Tustin, CA


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:39:37 PM PST US
    From: george may <gfmjr_20@HOTMAIL.COM>
    Subject: Main Spar Bolts and Holes
    mine were tight----------------- George May 601XL 912sdo not archive _________________________________________________________________ Get the power of Windows + Web with the new Windows Live. http://www.windowslive.com?ocid=TXT_TAGHM_Wave2_powerofwindows_122007


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:04:44 PM PST US
    From: Juan Vega <amyvega2005@earthlink.net>
    Subject: Re: Main Spar Bolts and Holes
    I was a quick built Kit and my spar bolt holes were missaligned and tighter. The problem lies in the fact that the spar cassette can slide down when the wings are off. so took oversized screw driver and as wings were placed, I hammered the driver through to realign the bolt holes. A few were tight and we bought the AN 6 size bolts and instead tried to hammer the suppled bolts. That finally worked. AN 6 would work, thicker bolt afterall than an5s. The wings you mentioned fell off the plane because the flyer forgot that manauvering speed was 103, not 130. 6 gs is "utility at manauvering speed. Irrelevant to whether AN6 bolt. When the bolts are bolted in Torgue them to proper speck, AN6 have different Torques. Toirque the rear spar bolt as well. As per Faa documents, "if bolts are torqued per the chart, the default rate is zero". -----Original Message----- >From: papaniapatrick@aol.com >Sent: Dec 14, 2007 7:48 PM >To: zenith-list@matronics.com >Subject: Re: Zenith-List: Main Spar Bolts and Holes > >I am building an XL, but it is not a quick build. My wing spar bolts are a tight fit into the holes. I fitted pins for the wing spars so that I could trial fit the wings during construction and fitting. There was absolutely no slop what so ever. > > >-----Original Message----- >From: steve <notsew_evets@frontiernet.net> >To: zenith-list@matronics.com >Sent: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 7:12 pm >Subject: Zenith-List: Main Spar Bolts and Holes > > >OK builders here is one for you.... > >? > >I m about to install my wings on the 601 XL QBK. > >The other night I wanted to see how tight the main spar bolts would fit into the wing spar ( factory drilled ) holes. > >Man O man, there is a lot of "slop" in the holes. > >I emailed Zenith and told them that I was concerned about this critical part. > >The first answer I got from Zenith was, " Some slop is needed to get the bolts in the holes ".... > >I disagreed.. > >Zenith asked me to measure the holes.? I did.? Used a caliper on the bolts and then the holes.? I got a reading of .011.. > >Eleven thousandths.....difference. > >I m not a machinist but I aint totally stupit either. > >Then Zenith emailed and said that I need to increase the spar hole size to an AN-6.? Thats 3/8 inch..... > >Since I m not into dying just yet I asked Zenith engineers to confirm the the AN 6 size is safe.? I am worried about the metal removal on the spar.?? > >They did....Said that in no way will going to an AN 6 decrease the wing strength..... > >Sooooo,? what I want to know from you builders is this:? Tell us about your experience with the spar and bolts.? Were yours tight ??? Sloppy ?? > >? > >Steve W > >? > > >________________________________________________________________________


    Message 20


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:21:17 PM PST US
    From: JAPhillipsGA@aol.com
    Subject: Re: Main Spar Bolts and Holes
    Steve, my bolts were a good fit. On enlarging the holes and bolts. Do NOT drill to the final size. Buy and use a reemer. Large drill bits make three sided holes. Also on the bolts. If your going to the expense buy NAS bolts. They are much stronger than ANs and closer tolerance. At my next annual I plan on replacing my XL AN spar bolts with NAS bolts. Best of luck, Bill of Georgia ************************************** See AOL's top rated recipes (http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)


    Message 21


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:32:04 PM PST US
    Subject: 601XL - Riveting HT Attachment Brackets
    From: "PatrickW" <pwhoyt@yahoo.com>
    Is there any advantage to NOT riveting the HT Attachment Brackets (6B1-8 and 6B1-9) at the same time that the rest of the lower rear fuselage is riveted...? I'm roughly done with 6-B-4 (lower rear fuselage assembly) and am wondering if any of you guys who are further along found it best to rivet the HT Attachment Brackets at this time, or if it's better to be able to remove them later in the process (like when you are fitting the horizontal stabilizer). Thanks, Patrick XL/Corvair Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=152271#152271


    Message 22


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:43:33 PM PST US
    From: "Craig Payne" <craig@craigandjean.com>
    Subject: 601XL - Riveting HT Attachment Brackets
    Some report that they can fit the horizontal stabilizer with all the brackets and the top rear skin in place and some find they can't. The quick-build kits come with one of the forward brackets uninstalled. -- Craig -----Original Message----- From: owner-zenith-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-zenith-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of PatrickW Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 8:29 PM Subject: Zenith-List: 601XL - Riveting HT Attachment Brackets Is there any advantage to NOT riveting the HT Attachment Brackets (6B1-8 and 6B1-9) at the same time that the rest of the lower rear fuselage is riveted...? I'm roughly done with 6-B-4 (lower rear fuselage assembly) and am wondering if any of you guys who are further along found it best to rivet the HT Attachment Brackets at this time, or if it's better to be able to remove them later in the process (like when you are fitting the horizontal stabilizer). Thanks, Patrick XL/Corvair Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=152271#152271


    Message 23


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:05:42 PM PST US
    From: Debo Cox <sky_ranger161@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: Main Spar Bolts and Holes
    Hey guys, Like Larry, I scratch-built my spars and spent an insane amount of time lining up, drilling, and reaming the spar bolt holes. Mine are what Section 7-39 of the AC43.13-1B says bolt holes of primary connecting elements should be - a "light-drive" fit. Since I know the next question, a "light-drive" fit is defined as "an interference of 0.0006 inch for a 5/8 inch bolt." For those of us (me included) that need further explanation, that's tight. God knows I'm no expert. Just passing along what the book says. Debo Cox Nags Head, NC Scratch-built XL/Corvair www.mykitlog.com/debo Do not archive


    Message 24


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:25:33 PM PST US
    From: "steve" <notsew_evets@frontiernet.net>
    Subject: More on wing spar bolts/holes
    Cant for the life of me figure out how to respond to threads without starting a new message, Oh well. Thank Goodness you guys are here. I ve been looking on the internet for reamers. I see 3/8 inch reamers with a .3750 and I see a .3760 I "assume" I would purchase a .3750.....???? If I undersize the drill bit and then ream, what "exact" size drill bit do I use ?? Anybody have a reamer and drill bit for sale ....??? New are $18, that aint no big deal but I thought I d ask. Steve


    Message 25


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:35:22 PM PST US
    From: "Jeff " <jeffrey_davidson@earthlink.net>
    Subject: Main Spar Bolts and Holes
    Steve, I'm building an HD, but I can tell you that the holes in the splice plate that connects the center wing spar with the outer wing spar are 3/8 and 5/16. I had to replace the rear splice plates from the factory so I drilled those holes. With a drill and then a reamer in a drill press, I got a snug fit that required just a little pressure to get the bolts into the holes through the splice plates and spar caps. They were a tight enough fit that they would not go through unless the plate was exactly flat and lined up with the spar caps. The point is that 3/8 size is normal in the HD/HDS wing spar caps. Jeff Davidson <snip> Then Zenith emailed and said that I need to increase the spar hole size to an AN-6. Thats 3/8 inch..... Since I m not into dying just yet I asked Zenith engineers to confirm the the AN 6 size is safe. I am worried about the metal removal on the spar. They did....Said that in no way will going to an AN 6 decrease the wing strength..... Sooooo, what I want to know from you builders is this: Tell us about your experience with the spar and bolts. Were yours tight ??? Sloppy ?? Steve W


    Message 26


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:47:46 PM PST US
    From: David Downey <planecrazydld@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: Avex Rivets
    I prefer to level the residual pintail by "dusting" it down flush with the rivet head in a series of light touches with a Dotco or similar very high speed grinder (sanding disc grinder). The problem with filing it down is that the pressure and vibration of filing are in cahoots to reduce the pintail retention system of the fastener (not the greatest to start with) John Marzulli <john.marzulli@gmail.com> wrote: I've have some rivets ( Zenith provided ) on my fuselage with the shank not having cleanly torn away and have been trying to figure out what to do about them. Is it safe to leave them, is it OK to "clean them up" with a file, or would it be best to drill them out and re-rivet those holes? Thanks, On Dec 4, 2007 1:11 PM, n801bh@netzero.com <n801bh@netzero.com> wrote: I am going to chime in here. On my 801 I built in 2001 every one of the ZAC supplied Rivets always pulled correctly and out of 14,000+, none ended up with a shank sticking out. The only difficult ones were the Stainless ones used on the firewall. They just broke the air riveter. :<(. Ben Haas N801BH www.haaspowerair.com -- "PatrickW" <pwhoyt@yahoo.com> wrote: dougsnash(at)yahoo.com wrote: > Personally, I'm using the Aircraft Spruce rivets. > > I belive the rivets that Zenith sells are from a certain Avex plant and have amore consistant breakaway of the stem when pulled. > > Occasionally, the Spruce rivets do have a slight protrusion of the broken stem. It happens but not very often. > I also used ACS rivets. I'd also purchased some A6's from ACS and from one other vendor (at Oshkosh) - the ones from ACS had a more consistent appearance and appeared to be of better quality which compares well with the ones supplied from Zenith. I've only used rivets from Zenith and from ACS. I threw away the ones I got from the other vendor. As far as the stems pulling off cleanly, I think that's more "luck of the draw". About 1 out of 4 of my Zenith supplied A5's have a sharp tip sticking up. Run your hand along your wing rivet lines and you'll see what I mean. I'm not too worried about it, but if I were polishing my wings I would be as it would tear up polish pads in short order. Patrick XL/Corvair Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=150395#150395 ========================bsp; -- Please Support Your Lists This Month -- -- John Marzulli http://701Builder.blogspot.com/ "Flying a plane is no different than riding a bicycle... it's just a lot harder to put baseball cards in the spokes. -Airplane The Movie Dave Downey Harleysville (SE) PA 100 HP Corvair --------------------------------- Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.


    Message 27


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:03:13 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: More on wing spar bolts/holes
    From: "Ron Lendon" <rlendon@comcast.net>
    Use a drill about 1/64 smaller than the final size should work in most applications. -------- Ron Lendon, Clinton Township, MI Corvair Zodiac XL, ScrapBuilder ;-) http://www.mykitlog.com/rlendon Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=152289#152289


    Message 28


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:13:52 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Main Spar Bolts and Holes
    From: "Ron Lendon" <rlendon@comcast.net>
    Mine are tight and I reamed them up to 5/16 from 1/4" I kept everything bolted together and only worked one hole at a time. With your QB I'm guessing the wings and fuselage are built. Bolt it together, check your Dihedral and work one hole at a time with a hand drill and vee block. Get a set of reamers to open the holes up a little at a time. You can see the process I used at this link: http://mykitlog.com/users/display_log.php?user=rlendon&project=113&category=0&log=24457&row=228 -------- Ron Lendon, Clinton Township, MI Corvair Zodiac XL, ScrapBuilder ;-) http://www.mykitlog.com/rlendon Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=152290#152290


    Message 29


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:16:46 PM PST US
    From: David Downey <planecrazydld@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: 601XL-TD Question
    or, if you are determined to improve the toughness of the tailcone structure, space the rivet line slightly closer together and add a few percent more rivets into the build. Most of the joints look like they will be head pops or shear rather than bearing failure in the thin sheet. Pay very anal attention to the quality of the hole sizes, citcularity, deburring, and proper setting of those rivets and the basic design is probably OK for a lifetime of minor "learning cycles". Brad, Rivet size is determined by the material and loads that are being supported. To arbitrarily put in A5s you place excessive loading on the thin materials, you limit your options when you miss the size and have to go to the next larger to compensate and you gain none of the material strength by using A5s where A4s are specified. Stay with plan "a" would be my recommendation. Larry McFarland 601HDS at www.macsmachine.com Brad Cohen wrote: > > OK, > this is for those of you with TD's out there; > > I am seriously considering replacing all A4's with A5's in the rear > fuselage. > > My assumption is the following; Yes. using all A5's will increase the > weight. Nominally (5#, maybe 10, but I doubt this much) Maybe not the > entire tail, I guess the turtledeck could be A4's but I am looking at > taking this trade-off for the increased strength. I am thinking about > all the abuse the tailfeathers will take once I start three-point > landings. > > Any thoughts? > > Brad Cohen > > Dave Downey Harleysville (SE) PA 100 HP Corvair --------------------------------- Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.


    Message 30


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:33:52 PM PST US
    From: David Downey <planecrazydld@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Removing metal scratches on Rudder
    I would caution that some areas of skin are more subject to the effects of sonic fatigue than others. The input stimulations can be proprllor pulses, engine exhaust reports, high frequency air buffeting, and anyplace that goes resonant as a result of applied sonic pressures. These possible locations need to have any "sharp bottomed" scratch burnished out (then filled, if desired). If your nail is stuck in it then mild buffing is in order, but since it is on the skin I would not worry too much, the properties of 6061 will allow it to stay resistant to corrosion. If you are buffing your plane then it will come out. If your painting then a small amount of putty will remove all trace. Once again this is for a skin in which we have a scratch that we are not worried about becoming a crack. If this was a spar then all trace would need to be removed. Mark Townsend Alma, Ontario Zodiac 601XL C-GOXL, CH701 just started www.ch601.org / www.ch701.com / www.Osprey2.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-zenith-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-zenith-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of John Reinking Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 11:45 AM Subject: Zenith-List: Removing metal scratches on Rudder Just finished riveting the rudder together. Being a newbie builder, even being careful, have all kinds of very thin scratches on the skin surfaces. Is this deadly? Is there some way to buff them out and (lastly) quick instructions on how to do that? Thanks, gang, John Reinking (starting 601XL) 12/5/2007 8:41 AM 12/5/2007 8:41 AM Dave Downey Harleysville (SE) PA 100 HP Corvair --------------------------------- Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   zenith-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Zenith-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/zenith-list
  • Browse Zenith-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/zenith-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --