Zenith-List Digest Archive

Wed 07/16/08


Total Messages Posted: 47



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 02:34 AM - Re: Over filling during flight? (THOMAS SMALL)
     2. 02:46 AM - Re: Answer: Five Years, Six Months and 16 days (stepinwolf)
     3. 04:04 AM - Re: Over filling during flight? (Paul Mulwitz)
     4. 04:40 AM - Answer: Five Years, Six Months and 16 days (Beckman, Rick)
     5. 05:04 AM - Re: do not assume (jaybannist@cs.com)
     6. 05:04 AM - Re: do not assume (Al Hays)
     7. 06:47 AM - XL canopy open (chris Sinfield)
     8. 07:02 AM - Re: XL canopy open (Juan Vega)
     9. 07:11 AM - Re: XL canopy open (jaybannist@cs.com)
    10. 07:33 AM - Re: XL canopy open (Jay Maynard)
    11. 07:50 AM - Re: XL canopy open (Jonathan Starke)
    12. 07:58 AM - Re: Kuntzleman Streamline Combo Nav/Strobe Lights On 601XL (Dave VanLanen)
    13. 08:00 AM - Re: Re: Was it such a good idea to split the lists?Was it such a good idea to split the lists? (Jim McBurney)
    14. 08:10 AM - Re: Answer: Five Years, Six Months and 16 days (Terry Phillips)
    15. 08:34 AM - Re: Re: Kuntzleman Streamline Combo Nav/Strobe Lights On 601XL (Terry Phillips)
    16. 08:39 AM - Re: Answer: Five Years, Six Months and 16 days (Randy L. Thwing)
    17. 08:52 AM - Re: do not assume ()
    18. 09:35 AM - Re: XL canopy open (Craig Payne)
    19. 10:07 AM - Re: do not assume (Carlos Sa)
    20. 10:52 AM - Strategies for car gas at the airport (Craig Payne)
    21. 11:19 AM - Re: Strategies for car gas at the airport (Beckman, Rick)
    22. 12:48 PM - Re: XL canopy open (Juan Vega)
    23. 01:18 PM - Re: Strategies for car gas at the airport (Paul Mulwitz)
    24. 01:21 PM - Re: Strategies for car gas at the airport (Gig Giacona)
    25. 01:23 PM - Re: Strategies for car gas at the airport (Terry Phillips)
    26. 01:40 PM - Re: Strategies for car gas at the airport (Juan Vega)
    27. 01:58 PM - Re: Strategies for car gas at the airport (Paul Mulwitz)
    28. 02:36 PM - Re: Strategies for car gas at the airport (Dave Austin)
    29. 02:42 PM - Re: Strategies for car gas at the airport (kmccune)
    30. 02:53 PM - Re: Strategies for car gas at the airport (Bruce Johnson)
    31. 03:18 PM - Re: Re: Strategies for car gas at the airport (Juan Vega)
    32. 03:34 PM - Re: do not assume (Bryan Martin)
    33. 03:51 PM - Re: XL canopy open (Bryan Martin)
    34. 03:57 PM - Re: Over filling during flight? (raymondj)
    35. 04:04 PM - Re: Re: Was it such a good idea to split the lists?Was it 	 such a good idea to split the lists? (n801bh@netzero.com)
    36. 04:05 PM - copying holes (Carlos Sa)
    37. 04:25 PM - Re: do not assume (raymondj)
    38. 04:48 PM - 601 cowl and subaru mt (Bill Flick)
    39. 05:20 PM - Re: Strategies for car gas at the airport (LarryMcFarland)
    40. 06:09 PM - Re: Answer: Five Years, Six Months and 16 days (John Reinking)
    41. 07:04 PM - Re: Strategies for car gas at the airport (Craig Spainhower)
    42. 07:24 PM - Re: Answer: Five Years, Six Months and 16 days (cookwithgas)
    43. 09:06 PM - Re: copying holes (Ron Lendon)
    44. 09:14 PM - Re: do not assume (Ron Lendon)
    45. 09:21 PM - Re: Answer: Five Years, Six Months and 16 days (Ron Lendon)
    46. 09:34 PM - Re: Strategies for car gas at the airport (Craig Payne)
    47. 09:59 PM - New seats from Flightcrafters (Dr. Andrew Elliott)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:34:39 AM PST US
    From: "THOMAS SMALL" <tjs22t@verizon.net>
    Subject: RE: Over filling during flight?
    Go back in the archives and use "Pillar Point & Bill Morelli" as he uses one...do not archive Pillar Point Avionics offers an optical in-tank sensor that you could use. Normally this is used to sense when a tank is emptying and the sensor uncovered. But there is no reason why you couldn't use it to sense when it becomes covered. http://www.ppavionics.com/UFSTUFSAN.htm


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:46:45 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Answer: Five Years, Six Months and 16 days
    From: "stepinwolf" <robert.pelland@cgocable.ca>
    Congratulations Scott, now all that is left for you to do, is to enjoy your new toy to the fullest. Not wanting to high jack your thread, I too this week have reached a new milestone. I have not flown for the past thirty years, and although I am turning 65, have had quad by-pass, along with numerous cases of " cut & paste " done to my body, I have just passed my medical, and will be renewing my PPL in the next month or so. Fly safe Bob the 701 scratch Trois Rivieres, Quebec # 7-7143 -------- Live each day, as if it was your last Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=193035#193035


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:04:53 AM PST US
    From: Paul Mulwitz <psm@att.net>
    Subject: Re: Over filling during flight?
    Hi Larry, I've been mulling over your question about filling the header tank. I didn't want to say anything because I really don't have a complete solution to the problem. However, I have a different way of looking at it that might help you. My thought is to design some electronic control that allows the fuel pump to operate only when the header tank has room for fuel. This would allow you to automatically keep the header tank loaded without any conscious effort on your part. Such a circuit would need "Hysterisis" (sp?) which means it would use different levels of fuel in the tank to turn off and turn on. For example it might turn on when the tank is 1/4 full and turn off when it is 9/10 full. While such a control circuit is relatively simple to design, I'm afraid my own experience is not up to the task. The problems are the harsh environment of being in an airplane and the high power needed to drive the fuel pump. My own experience was limited to circuits working in the more benign electrical environment of the innerds of a computer. That means I am not volunteering to do the design but just suggesting the idea. Good luck, Paul XL almost there. At 06:23 PM 7/15/2008, you wrote: >The question would be, is it possible to use the EIS to read the >full point of a common rheostat type tank sensor to set an alarm point? > >Or, should one consider a blinking light that constantly runs when >either of the wing pumps is running. > >Or, does anyone have a good "reminder" that the pump is running or >the tank is nearly full? > >Thanks again, > >Larry McFarland 601HDS at www.macsmachine.com


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:40:28 AM PST US
    Subject: Answer: Five Years, Six Months and 16 days
    From: "Beckman, Rick" <Rick.Beckman@atk.com>
    CONGRATULATIONS, Scott!!!!!! r I did it guys. At 1:30PM Central time today, July 15th, I officially became a certificated sport pilot. Now I can go somewhere an take someone along! Life is good. Scott Laughlin Omaha, Nebraska 601XL/Corvair 77 hours.


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:04:43 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: do not assume
    From: jaybannist@cs.com
    Carlos, Try the hardware store.? Look for a "drywall square".? Jay in Dallas -----Original Message----- From: Carlos Sa <carlossa52@gmail.com> Sent: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 9:46 pm Subject: Zenith-List: do not assume So, you already know the bottom line to this note. Now please bear with me while I vent a little - and share a lesson. Eons ago, when I started building, I obsessed about getting a true straight edge (check archives, around late XXth century). I eventually settled on (1) accepting that the edge of a sheet 4x8 or 4x12 is straight and (2) an 8' melamine shelf as a "ruler". I also (3) assumed that an aluminum sheet, as delivered by the mill/dealer, is rectangular. Weeks ago I cut the (outboard wing) skins from 4x12 sheets, using the assumptions above. I have drilled the (HD) outboard nose skin and the top skin. All nice and clecoed. Today, when I positioned the bottom skin in place, I noticed something was off. About 5 mm off. As if the rear z was offset to one side by 5 mm. Pardon y French, but @#%! So, I disassembled the whole thing, and, to verify if the top and bottom skins were (are) square, I placed them one of top of the other. Well, they disagree. By about 5 mm. I either made a mistake when cutting one of them or assumption (3) above isn't true. Of course, it's now impossible to verify which one is true. (In a few days I might admit it was my mistake, but for now I have to blame somebody/thing else.) So there goes a hundred bucks (or so, we'll see when I buy another sheet) out the window and, more important, umpteen hours (technical term for several evenings) polishing the darn thing. Does anybody know where I can get a precision, real large, square? Carlos CH601-HD, plans (as in "plans to finish someday") One step for man, two steps backwards. ________________________________________________________________________ Email message sent from CompuServe - visit us today at http://www.cs.com


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:04:43 AM PST US
    From: Al Hays <alhays@hickoryhillfarmsheep.com>
    Subject: Re: do not assume
    Carlos, As an alternative to the excellent 3-4-5 triangle measurement Keith suggests, I use a drywall square. It's like a 4 foot version of the thing I've seen used at drafting tables before CAD came along. I also use a carpenter's square for smaller items. I'd be lost at a drafting table and don't know squat about CAD, but I trust the drywall and framing squares. If you find a used drywall square, just be sure it hasn't been bent or gotten loose from rough treatment. Home Depot or Lowe's are convenient places to get new ones at reasonable cost. Al CH701 & 601XL, N701GH & N5892H reserved On Jul 15, 2008, at 10:46 PM, Carlos Sa wrote: > Does anybody know where I can get a precision, real large, square? > > > Carlos > CH601-HD, plans (as in "plans to finish someday") > One step for man, two steps backwards.


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:47:06 AM PST US
    Subject: XL canopy open
    From: "chris Sinfield" <chris_sinfield@yahoo.com.au>
    Guys and Girls, Just writing my emergency procedures for my XL flight manual. This is to those that are up and flying.. 1. If the canopy comes unlatched on one side or open on both sides, can you slow down and close it again? I guess it would rise up a bit. 2. If the canopy breaks or somehow comes off, will the aircraft still fly with all the drag from the fwd turtle deck. I know there are some photos showing open cockpit / sports models but they appear to have a closed turtle deck. I know that someone in a HDS once wrote that he lost his canopy and still did a slower circuit and landed again without much problems, I wonder if thats the same as the XL?? Chris.. Building and writing XL 6337 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=193078#193078


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:02:16 AM PST US
    From: Juan Vega <amyvega2005@earthlink.net>
    Subject: Re: XL canopy open
    the procedure i tested are as follows: 1- in event of canopy unlatch or falure, slow the plane down to below 80 mph. Fly the plane 2- in event of cabin opening, slow the plane at altitude enough to relatch, when relatched resume normal flight, if not relatchable, Land. 3- in event of canopy complete failure, slow to below 80 mph, fly the plane, decend and land. Keep power at landing as plane will slow down much quicker due to drag. In all possible events, don't panic, fly the plane. Juan -----Original Message----- >From: chris Sinfield <chris_sinfield@yahoo.com.au> >Sent: Jul 16, 2008 9:44 AM >To: zenith-list@matronics.com >Subject: Zenith-List: XL canopy open > > >Guys and Girls, >Just writing my emergency procedures for my XL flight manual. This is to those that are up and flying.. > >1. If the canopy comes unlatched on one side or open on both sides, can you slow down and close it again? I guess it would rise up a bit. > >2. If the canopy breaks or somehow comes off, will the aircraft still fly with all the drag from the fwd turtle deck. I know there are some photos showing open cockpit / sports models but they appear to have a closed turtle deck. > >I know that someone in a HDS once wrote that he lost his canopy and still did a slower circuit and landed again without much problems, I wonder if thats the same as the XL?? >Chris.. >Building and writing >XL 6337 > > >Read this topic online here: > >http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=193078#193078 > >


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:11:51 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: XL canopy open
    From: jaybannist@cs.com
    Chris, If I'm not mistaken the canopy that departed in flight was one of the early side opening types.? It would open from either side, so if both latches failed, the canopy could depart.? The XL canopy is securely fastened to the airframe, even when open.? I just can't imagine one simply coming off. Obviously, it could be destroyed by a large bird strike or a mid-air collision, in which case you wouldn't be worrying about whether the turtle deck was open or closed. Jay in Dallas -----Original Message----- From: chris Sinfield <chris_sinfield@yahoo.com.au> Sent: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 8:44 am Subject: Zenith-List: XL canopy open Guys and Girls, Just writing my emergency procedures for my XL flight manual. This is to those that are up and flying.. 1. If the canopy comes unlatched on one side or open on both sides, can you slow down and close it again? I guess it would rise up a bit. 2. If the canopy breaks or somehow comes off, will the aircraft still fly with all the drag from the fwd turtle deck. I know there are some photos showing open cockpit / sports models but they appear to have a closed turtle deck. I know that someone in a HDS once wrote that he lost his canopy and still did a slower circuit and landed again without much problems, I wonder if thats the same as the XL?? Chris.. Building and writing XL 6337 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=193078#193078 ________________________________________________________________________ Email message sent from CompuServe - visit us today at http://www.cs.com


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:33:56 AM PST US
    From: Jay Maynard <jmaynard@conmicro.com>
    Subject: Re: XL canopy open
    On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 06:44:19AM -0700, chris Sinfield wrote: > 1. If the canopy comes unlatched on one side or open on both sides, can > you slow down and close it again? I guess it would rise up a bit. The AMD POH says to slow to 60 knots, fly the airplane, make a normal landing, and close it on the ground. It specifically says not to attempt to close it in flight. > 2. If the canopy breaks or somehow comes off, will the aircraft still fly > with all the drag from the fwd turtle deck. I know there are some photos > showing open cockpit / sports models but they appear to have a closed > turtle deck. Again, I'd expect to fly it at slower speed, and probably have to use more power than normal, but it should fly well enough to make a normal landing. -- Jay Maynard, K5ZC http://www.conmicro.com http://jmaynard.livejournal.com http://www.tronguy.net Fairmont, MN (FRM) (Yes, that's me!) AMD Zodiac CH601XLi N55ZC (got it!)


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:50:01 AM PST US
    From: "Jonathan Starke" <jonathan@entry.co.za>
    Subject: XL canopy open
    Chris wrote.... 1. If the canopy comes unlatched on one side or open on both sides, can you slow down and close it again? I guess it would rise up a bit. I am afraid you will NOT be able to re-latch the canopy, I have tried. The canopy has a 'double' latch, and I once took off with the one side having been latched on the firt latch one, well with all my considerable weight on the window sill, I could NOT latch the canopy further. I could barely move the canopy down, that even when I slowed to 70mph I only realised the latch was on only the first click, was when the wind started tugging at my left hand shirt sleeve. I have dual sticks, so my left arm rests on the sill. Jonathan 601XL 140+ hrs


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:58:26 AM PST US
    From: "Dave VanLanen" <davevanlanen@sbcglobal.net>
    Subject: RE: Kuntzleman Streamline Combo Nav/Strobe Lights On 601XL
    Terry, Yes, I'll plan to take a look at the Jabiru setup. Will you be at Oshkosh? Dave Do Not Archive Time: 03:38:18 PM PST US From: Terry Phillips <ttp44@rkymtn.net> Subject: Re: Zenith-List: RE: Kuntzleman Streamline Combo Nav/Strobe Lights On 601XL Dave It is good to hear that you are going to Oshkosh. While you're there, compare the mount of the GS-Air combos (Thank you Pete--From catalog displays I'd say they are identical to the Kunzleman's) on the Jabiru models with the mount location on the 601XL. I think that you'll conclude (as I did) that, if it's legal on the Jabiru, then it will be legal on the 601XL. That said, it never hurts (except for weight) to err on the side of visibility, so your plan to go with the 3-location light system is sound. Terry At 09:31 AM 7/15/2008 -0500, you wrote: ><davevanlanen@sbcglobal.net> >


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:00:18 AM PST US
    From: "Jim McBurney" <jmcburney@pobox.com>
    Subject: Re: Was it such a good idea to split the lists?Was it
    such a good idea to split the lists? I vote for split lists. Do not archive Blue skies and tailwinds Jim CH-801 DeltaHawk diesel Augusta GA 90% done, 90% left


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:10:58 AM PST US
    From: Terry Phillips <ttp44@rkymtn.net>
    Subject: Re: Answer: Five Years, Six Months and 16 days
    Congratulations Scott! I think you may have established a new world record. Enjoy your 601XL. Terry At 02:01 PM 7/15/2008 -0700, you wrote: >Question: How long does it take a non-flying, married guy with a full >time job and kids to build an airplane, use it to learn to fly, then get >his sport pilot license? > >I did it guys. At 1:30PM Central time today, July 15th, I officially >became a certificated sport pilot. Now I can go somewhere an take someone >along! Life is good. Terry Phillips ZBAGer ttp44~at~rkymtn.net Corvallis MT 601XL/Jab 3300 s .. l .. o .. o .. w build kit - Tail, flaps, & ailerons are done; working on the wings http://www.mykitlog.com/N47TP/


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:34:52 AM PST US
    From: Terry Phillips <ttp44@rkymtn.net>
    Subject: Re: RE: Kuntzleman Streamline Combo Nav/Strobe Lights
    On 601XL Sadly no. Arlington was my Flyin for the year. I hope to go to Oshkosh in my 601XL, some year. Enjoy the show. There is so much to do and so much to learn. Terry At 09:55 AM 7/16/2008 -0500, you wrote: >Terry, > >Yes, I'll plan to take a look at the Jabiru setup. Will you be at Oshkosh? > >Dave > >Do Not Archive Terry Phillips ZBAGer ttp44~at~rkymtn.net Corvallis MT 601XL/Jab 3300 s .. l .. o .. o .. w build kit - Tail, flaps, & ailerons are done; working on the wings http://www.mykitlog.com/N47TP/


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:39:03 AM PST US
    From: "Randy L. Thwing" <n4546v@mindspring.com>
    Subject: Re: Answer: Five Years, Six Months and 16 days
    Do not archive So Scott: After all the advice and comments you requested and received, how about a report on your check ride experience? Regards, Randy, Las Vegas > I did it guys. At 1:30PM Central time today, July 15th, I officially > became a certificated sport pilot. Now I can go somewhere an take > someone along! Life is good. > > Scott Laughlin > Omaha, Nebraska > 601XL/Corvair > 77 hours.


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:52:44 AM PST US
    From: <rsteele@rjsit.com>
    Subject: do not assume
    And don't assume any square you buy will be square, most aren't. In particular framing squares usually need to be adjusted. You do this by peening the corner to open or close the square a bit. Peen the outside to close, the inside to open. I've found drywall squares to be better, but check them regularly. If it makes you feel any better, I'm now fitting my first rear wing skins. The pre-punched holes, done by a cnc machine, are off by 4mm from rr1 to rr9. This, I can tell you is a real pain in the neck. And while we are on the subject, don't trust tape measures either. If you use more than one they should be checked against each other over whatever the maximum length you are using. I've found most I've used to be in agreement, but I've seen at least one that was off an inch in 25ft. Ron -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Zenith-List: do not assume From: jaybannist@cs.com Carlos, Try the hardware store. Look for a "drywall square". Jay in Dallas -----Original Message----- From: Carlos Sa <carlossa52@gmail.com> To: zenith-list@matronics.com Sent: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 9:46 pm Subject: Zenith-List: do not assume So, you already know the bottom line to this note. Now please bear with me while I vent a little - and share a lesson. Eons ago, when I started building, I obsessed about getting a true straight edge (check archives, around late XXth century). I eventually settled on (1) accepting that the edge of a sheet 4x8 or 4x12 is straight and (2) an 8' melamine shelf as a "ruler". I also (3) assumed that an aluminum sheet, as delivered by the mill/dealer, is rectangular. Weeks ago I cut the (outboard wing) skins from 4x12 sheets, using the assumptions above. I have drilled the (HD) outboard nose skin and the top skin. All nice and clecoed. Today, when I positioned the bottom skin in place, I noticed something was off. About 5 mm off. As if the rear z was offset to one side by 5 mm. Pardon y French, but @#%! So, I disassembled the whole thing, and, to verify if the top and bottom skins were (are) square, I placed them one of top of the other. Well, they disagree. By about 5 mm. I either made a mistake when cutting one of them or assumption (3) above isn't true. Of course, it's now impossible to verify which one is true. (In a few days I might admit it was my mistake, but for now I have to blame somebody/thing else.) So there goes a hundred bucks (or so, we'll see when I buy another sheet) out the window and, more important, umpteen hours (technical term for several evenings) polishing the darn thing. Does anybody know where I can get a precision, real large, square? Carlos CH601-HD, plans (as in "plans to finish someday") One step for man, two steps backwards. Email message sent from CompuServe - visit us today at http://www.cs.com


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:35:27 AM PST US
    From: "Craig Payne" <craig@craigandjean.com>
    Subject: XL canopy open
    This is what I have written in the past: Back in December Clive Richards sent out the attached report from the UK PFA magazine of an anonymous pilot testing his (pre-XL?) 601 with an open canopy. He attached a safety cord and intentionally unlatched his canopy. Quoting: "I commenced the test at 3500 ft and 80 knots cruise. I secured the safety cord to the cleat at my elbow with about 1 ft of slack and released the catch. The canopy rapidly popped up about 1 ft at the trailing edge as expected. I then slowly paid out the cord from the cleat and allowed the canopy to rise to a steady state. The canopy adopted a position where the base of the canopy settled to an angle of about 35 degrees to the airflow. Full lateral and pitch control could be maintained but forward speed dropped to about 60 knots and despite increase to full throttle descent was about 300 ft/min. An unexpected problem now presented itself. I was descending quickly and all the strength I could muster with my right arm was only just sufficient to pull the cord down and cleat it progressively. Possibly the slot effect at the front of the canopy open at the front increased the lift (and additionally the gas struts require a cord load of 15 lbs static). I finally, exhausted, got it down to about 6 inches and returned to." Craig again. I had a similar experience in an Evektor SportStar. This LSA resembles the 601XL: low wing, front-hinged bubble canopy. One difference is that the canopy is split behind the seats. There is a cross-bar behind the seats: www.evektoramerica.com/SportStarPlus.htm I was flying left-seat with my instructor. The canopy popped while we were in the pattern. I would estimate that the gap was well over a foot. While the instructor flew I tried to close the canopy. I wrapped my arm around the cross-bar and used all my weight and strength and could not close the canopy. At best I think I got the gap down to 6-8 inches. Evektor redesigned the latch the next year. I believe the upward force was generated by lift and not wind under the canopy as it did not decrease as I closed the gap. -- Craig


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:07:43 AM PST US
    From: "Carlos Sa" <carlossa52@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: do not assume
    Thanks to all that replied. I too found that tape measures aren't to be blindly trusted. Actually, this goes for any measuring tool bought at a hardware store, whether they have an aerospace department or not. Carlos do not archive 2008/7/16 <rsteele@rjsit.com>: > > And don't assume any square you buy will be square, most aren't. In > particular framing squares usually need to be adjusted. You do this by > peening the corner to > open or close the square a bit. Peen the outside to close, the inside > to open. > I've found drywall squares to be better, but check them regularly. > > If it makes you feel any better, I'm now fitting my first rear wing > skins. The pre-punched holes, done by a cnc machine, are off by 4mm > from rr1 to rr9. This, I > can tell you is a real pain in the neck. > > And while we are on the subject, don't trust tape measures either. If > you use more > than one they should be checked against each other over whatever the > maximum length > you are using. I've found most I've used to be in agreement, but I've > seen at least > one that was off an inch in 25ft. > > Ron >


    Message 20


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:52:08 AM PST US
    From: "Craig Payne" <craig@craigandjean.com>
    Subject: Strategies for car gas at the airport
    The Rotax 912 prefers unleaded fuel. But there is none available at my airport. I can burn 100LL if I add Decalin although there will be more deposit build-up and I'll have to change oil more often. So I'm looking at ways to haul car gas to the hanger. Since my 701 holds 20 gallons a couple of 5 gal jerry cans isn't going to do it. And fueling a high-wing by hand will be a challenge. I drive an SUV and not a pickup and I'm not wild about hauling gas inside the car. But I will if I have to. And then there is the whole issue of the shelf life of car gas. How do others do this? One idea is to just fill the car and pump gas from the car's tank. But I think there is an anti-siphon/theft device on most car tank filler necks. -- Craig


    Message 21


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:19:45 AM PST US
    Subject: Strategies for car gas at the airport
    From: "Beckman, Rick" <Rick.Beckman@atk.com>
    Craig, fill the tank on your car with the desired fuel. Stick a siphon hose in the car tank at the plane. Connect the siphon hose to an electric Facet pump with the hose on the other end in the wing tank. Wire the pump with an end that plugs into the "cigar lighter" receptacle in the car and keep an eye on the fuel level in the tanks. Very little work on your part and rather safe, too. Just be careful not to drain the car tank too low! You could, also, use the Gerry cans to supplement the car tank if it is too small. You don't want to have to walk home!! Rick Do NOT archive. The Rotax 912 prefers unleaded fuel. But there is none available at my airport. I can burn 100LL if I add Decalin although there will be more deposit build-up and I'll have to change oil more often. So I'm looking at ways to haul car gas to the hanger. Since my 701 holds 20 gallons a couple of 5 gal jerry cans isn't going to do it. And fueling a high-wing by hand will be a challenge. I drive an SUV and not a pickup and I'm not wild about hauling gas inside the car. But I will if I have to. And then there is the whole issue of the shelf life of car gas. How do others do this? One idea is to just fill the car and pump gas from the car's tank. But I think there is an anti-siphon/theft device on most car tank filler necks. -- Craig


    Message 22


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:48:48 PM PST US
    From: Juan Vega <amyvega2005@earthlink.net>
    Subject: XL canopy open
    Jonathon and Friends: I agree it is difficult to relatch but not impossible,since I relatched mine at 8,000 ft. hence my response earlier was based on what I did during that incident. Basically ,stall the airplane and at apex, seal the latch. I think where Jonathon's situation came in is everyone job sealing tightness is differnt on each plane , which I found in trying 3 different planes. Jonathon is correct though in the safest option is.. just land then fix. Since I was high up, 8,000 ft, I cut the flow of air over the canopy to the point where it relatched, basically yanking back on the yoke to stall. Not the safest, but I was comfortable with myself. If both sides release, all bets are off. safety first, just land. Juan -----Original Message----- >From: Jonathan Starke <jonathan@entry.co.za> >Sent: Jul 16, 2008 10:46 AM >To: zenith-list@matronics.com >Subject: RE: Zenith-List: XL canopy open > > >Chris wrote.... > >1. If the canopy comes unlatched on one side or open on both >sides, can you slow down and close it again? I guess it would >rise up a bit. > > >I am afraid you will NOT be able to re-latch the canopy, I have tried. > >The canopy has a 'double' latch, and I once took off with the one side having >been latched on the firt latch one, well with all my considerable weight on the >window sill, I could NOT latch the canopy further. I could barely move the >canopy down, that even when I slowed to 70mph > >I only realised the latch was on only the first click, was when the wind started >tugging at my left hand shirt sleeve. I have dual sticks, so my left arm rests >on the sill. > >Jonathan >601XL 140+ hrs > >


    Message 23


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:18:47 PM PST US
    From: Paul Mulwitz <psm@att.net>
    Subject: Re: Strategies for car gas at the airport
    Hi Craig, One issue you might like to figure out. If you purchase gas at a gas station and put it in your plane then you have paid a tax for road use that you didn't use. You should be able to get a refund of this tax which can be upwards of $.50 per gallon depending on where you live. Paul XL getting close At 10:49 AM 7/16/2008, you wrote: >How do others do this? One idea is to just fill the car and pump gas from >the car's tank. But I think there is an anti-siphon/theft device on most car >tank filler necks.


    Message 24


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:21:56 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Strategies for car gas at the airport
    From: "Gig Giacona" <wrgiacona@gmail.com>
    If you flying a bunch, which I certainly hope to be doing once I get finished, you might consider mounting a 50 or 75 gallon tank on a small trailer. I'm thinking about doing that as well as mounting a hose and electric pump to the trailer. There is a gas station just a few miles from the airport and I have a hanger to keep it in. Yes it will cost some money but there is a $1.75 spread between the cost of 100LL and 93 mogas around here and at 6 gph it won't take too long to make back the cost. Or you could do what this guy did. http://www.alexisparkinn.com/fuel_truck.htm -------- W.R. &quot;Gig&quot; Giacona 601XL Under Construction See my progress at www.peoamerica.net/N601WR Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=193185#193185


    Message 25


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:23:37 PM PST US
    From: Terry Phillips <ttp44@rkymtn.net>
    Subject: Re: Strategies for car gas at the airport
    Craig Donald Hall gave a talk about fuel systems at the Arlington Flyin. He said that he has been using mogas for 20 years with the two pump systems shown in the attached photos. He said that the large gascolators on the pumps was very important to keep crud out of the gas tank. These photos are my photos of his prints, so, they are not the best. My impression was that he brought gas to the airplane in 5 5-gal containers and pumped from there. Pump_2 is an adaption of a commercial unit with an electrically driven pump. If you Google something like "gas caddy" you'll find items that look like pump_2 (without the gascolator), but they are not cheap. Terry Craig Payne wrote: > > The Rotax 912 prefers unleaded fuel. But there is none available at my > airport. I can burn 100LL if I add Decalin although there will be more > deposit build-up and I'll have to change oil more often. So I'm looking at > ways to haul car gas to the hanger. Since my 701 holds 20 gallons a couple > of 5 gal jerry cans isn't going to do it. And fueling a high-wing by hand > will be a challenge. I drive an SUV and not a pickup and I'm not wild about > hauling gas inside the car. But I will if I have to. And then there is the > whole issue of the shelf life of car gas. > > How do others do this? One idea is to just fill the car and pump gas from > the car's tank. But I think there is an anti-siphon/theft device on most car > tank filler necks. > > -- Craig > -- Terry Phillips ttp44~at~rkymtn.net Corvallis MT 601XL/Jab 3300 slow build kit - Rudder done--finally; working on the stab http://www.mykitlog.com/N47TP/


    Message 26


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:40:41 PM PST US
    From: Juan Vega <amyvega2005@earthlink.net>
    Subject: Re: Strategies for car gas at the airport
    Paul, have you gottena refund from the state for Road tax on the gas? that is great, i want to see if they really do that. juan -----Original Message----- >From: Paul Mulwitz <psm@att.net> >Sent: Jul 16, 2008 4:14 PM >To: zenith-list@matronics.com >Subject: Re: Zenith-List: Strategies for car gas at the airport > > >Hi Craig, > >One issue you might like to figure out. If you purchase gas at a gas >station and put it in your plane then you have paid a tax for road >use that you didn't use. You should be able to get a refund of this >tax which can be upwards of $.50 per gallon depending on where you live. > >Paul >XL getting close > >At 10:49 AM 7/16/2008, you wrote: >>How do others do this? One idea is to just fill the car and pump gas from >>the car's tank. But I think there is an anti-siphon/theft device on most car >>tank filler necks. > >


    Message 27


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:58:42 PM PST US
    From: Paul Mulwitz <psm@att.net>
    Subject: Re: Strategies for car gas at the airport
    Hi Juan, No, I haven;t gotten a refund. Alas, I haven't used mogas in my plane. One reason is my plane isn't finished yet. Another is I plan to use 100LL out of the pump at my local airport. My tax comment was based on what happens to farmers who use auto fuel for agricultural purposes. It seems the same to me - highway taxes paid at the pump wasn't earned by the state. This often isn't enough fuel to make it worth collecting the refund, but airplanes use a lot of fuel. Paul XL almost there do not archive At 01:35 PM 7/16/2008, you wrote: >Paul, >have you gottena refund from the state for Road tax on the >gas? that is great, i want to see if they really do that. > >juan


    Message 28


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:36:34 PM PST US
    From: "Dave Austin" <daveaustin2@primus.ca>
    Subject: Re: Strategies for car gas at the airport
    Up here in the frozen north (Canada) it is possible to get the fuel tax rebate. Dave Austin 601HDS - 912, Spitfire Mk VIII


    Message 29


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:42:42 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Strategies for car gas at the airport
    From: "kmccune" <kmccune@somtel.net>
    Yup you can get the refund, we use to do it "at home on the farm" There is paperwork and such but if you save up your receipts for once a year you could get a pretty nice check 4gph X 50hrs 0 gallons x .$50 =$100.00 I'm sure the paper work has changed, but then Mom did it so I have no idea what it was. Kevin -------- Mark Twain: Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=193213#193213


    Message 30


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:53:29 PM PST US
    From: Bruce Johnson <bjohnson@satx.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: Strategies for car gas at the airport
    For those in Texas, the refund is only 20 cent per gallon..., worth it, I guess depending on how much fuel you actually use.. the form is here: http://www.window.state.tx.us/taxinfo/taxforms/06-106.pdf The specific page I found that indicates that aircraft and boats qualify: http://www.window.state.tx.us/taxinfo/audit/motorfue/2_gasoline.htm#exceptions -Bruce Paul Mulwitz wrote: > > Hi Juan, > > No, I haven;t gotten a refund. Alas, I haven't used mogas in my plane. > One reason is my plane isn't finished yet. Another is I plan to use > 100LL out of the pump at my local airport. > > My tax comment was based on what happens to farmers who use auto fuel > for agricultural purposes. It seems the same to me - highway taxes paid > at the pump wasn't earned by the state. This often isn't enough fuel to > make it worth collecting the refund, but airplanes use a lot of fuel. > > Paul > XL almost there > do not archive > > > At 01:35 PM 7/16/2008, you wrote: >> Paul, >> have you gottena refund from the state for Road tax on the gas? that >> is great, i want to see if they really do that. >> >> juan >


    Message 31


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:18:22 PM PST US
    From: Juan Vega <amyvega2005@earthlink.net>
    Subject: Re: Strategies for car gas at the airport
    Sweat! I am going to check it out for FLorida. JUan -----Original Message----- >From: kmccune <kmccune@somtel.net> >Sent: Jul 16, 2008 5:38 PM >To: zenith-list@matronics.com >Subject: Zenith-List: Re: Strategies for car gas at the airport > > >Yup you can get the refund, we use to do it "at home on the farm" There is paperwork and such but if you save up your receipts for once a year you could get a pretty nice check 4gph X 50hrs 0 gallons x .$50 =$100.00 >I'm sure the paper work has changed, but then Mom did it so I have no idea what it was. > >Kevin > >-------- >Mark Twain: Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover. > > >Read this topic online here: > >http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=193213#193213 > >


    Message 32


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:34:15 PM PST US
    From: Bryan Martin <bryanmmartin@comcast.net>
    Subject: Re: do not assume
    If you want to know if a sheet of metal really is rectangular, measure the distance from diagonally opposite corners. If both diagonal measurements are exactly the same, you have a rectangle. The same method can be used to verify that the rectangle you have marked up for cutting actually is rectangular before you cut it. On Jul 15, 2008, at 10:46 PM, Carlos Sa wrote: > So, you already know the bottom line to this note. > Now please bear with me while I vent a little - and share a lesson. > Eons ago, when I started building, I obsessed about getting a true > straight edge (check archives, around late XXth century). > I eventually settled on (1) accepting that the edge of a sheet 4x8 > or 4x12 is straight and (2) an 8' melamine shelf as a "ruler". > I also (3) assumed that an aluminum sheet, as delivered by the mill/ > dealer, is rectangular. > -- Bryan Martin N61BM, CH 601 XL, RAM Subaru, Stratus redrive. do not archive.


    Message 33


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:51:15 PM PST US
    From: Bryan Martin <bryanmmartin@comcast.net>
    Subject: Re: XL canopy open
    I have had one side come unlatched in flight a few times, always just after takeoff. I believe that all cases were caused by my failure to fully latch the canopy before takeoff. In the first instance, I was able to re-latch it after climbing to a safe, throttling back to idle and slowing down to near stall speed. Later, I installed some foam weather strip under the canopy rail. Unfortunately, this foam got pretty stiff in cold weather and made it difficult to close the canopy fully, which led to a couple more instances. With the weather strip in place, I found it impossible to re-latch the canopy in flight and had to land to do it. I have since removed the foam and am trying out a different method of sealing the gap. I have never had both sides come unlatched in flight and don't think it's very likely, The design of the canopy pretty much assures that at least one side will fully latch, so both sides are not likely to come unlatched unless someone turns the release handle either accidently or intentionally. On Jul 16, 2008, at 9:44 AM, chris Sinfield wrote: > > > > Guys and Girls, > Just writing my emergency procedures for my XL flight manual. This > is to those that are up and flying.. > > 1. If the canopy comes unlatched on one side or open on both sides, > can you slow down and close it again? I guess it would rise up a bit. > > 2. If the canopy breaks or somehow comes off, will the aircraft > still fly with all the drag from the fwd turtle deck. I know there > are some photos showing open cockpit / sports models but they appear > to have a closed turtle deck. > > I know that someone in a HDS once wrote that he lost his canopy and > still did a slower circuit and landed again without much problems, I > wonder if thats the same as the XL?? > Chris.. > Building and writing > XL 6337 -- Bryan Martin N61BM, CH 601 XL, RAM Subaru, Stratus redrive. do not archive.


    Message 34


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:57:41 PM PST US
    From: "raymondj" <raymondj@frontiernet.net>
    Subject: Re: Over filling during flight?
    Would it be practical to run the header tank vent back into the top of wing tank so if the header gets full the excess is pumped back into the wing tank. Raymond Julian Kettle River, MN "Hope for the best, but prepare for the worst." ----- Original Message ----- From: "LarryMcFarland" <larry@macsmachine.com> <aeroelectric-list@matronics.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 8:23 PM Subject: Zenith-List: Over filling during flight? > > Hi Guys, > > July 14 Monday was perfect. I walked Toby our cat, then packed the flight > bag and went to the airport. After a lengthy preflight, the plane was > pulled from the hangar and I did a secondary walk around. All good, the > tower cleared my request for runway 5. I lifted off in a soft downwind, > but still short enough for traffic. I set course for Clinton and climbed > to 3000 ft. On the formerly flooded Mississippi, one could see the river > traffic moving again and a few recreational boaters. Clinton airport was > also visible 8-miles out. I passed over the airport and entered downwind > for 32. Good pattern work, but I flared a foot high and just bounced the > touchdown. I taxied in and parked to check wheel-pants for damage. None > was found, so after visiting with the FBO, I taxied to 32 and took off, > departed west. The header tank was less than full so the left wing pump > was turned on. Engine temps were good for an 85-degrees ambient. EGTs > 1370, oil 220, coolant 198, CHT 210 and oil pressure was 48 psi. On > turning south for the return, I called Quad Cities approach, collected > traffic and guidance and nearly forgot to track the refill. The header was > completely full when I turned off the wing pump and centered the selector > valve. I felt a chill down my spine, because I didn't want to overfill. > I worried that fumes from spilled fuel could trace across the 601s > non-laminar wing to the exhaust pipe's back draft and turn the plane into > a roman candle. I couldn't smell any fuel within the cabin. On landing, > I taxied back and shut down. Inside the header, fuel was 3-inches from the > cap and the overflow tube was dry. This is the tank's max fill limit. Very > relieved, I put the 601 back in the hangar and drove home with this tidbit > chewing on my mind. Nice flight, but the wrong kind of adrenaline rush! > > The question would be, is it possible to use the EIS to read the full > point of a common rheostat type tank sensor to set an alarm point? > > Or, should one consider a blinking light that constantly runs when either > of the wing pumps is running. > > Or, does anyone have a good "reminder" that the pump is running or the > tank is nearly full? > > Thanks again, > > Larry McFarland 601HDS at www.macsmachine.com > > > 270.4.11/1553 - Release Date: 7/15/2008 5:48 AM > > >


    Message 35


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:04:23 PM PST US
    From: "n801bh@netzero.com" <n801bh@netzero.com>
    Subject: Re: Was it such a good idea to split the lists?Was it
    such a good idea to split the lists? You guys are too much..... Matt went to alot of trouble to set up a 701/ 801 list. My take on this is I am a Zenith 801 builder and flyer. I also consider myself a Zenith family member and I am concerned about the 601 " issue" I still subsrcibe to all the Zenith lists to keep up with all the details but this straw poll is an act of futility. If ya want to see all posts subscribe to all the lists. if ya want to see only one then l eave the others out of your list. Trying to get Matt to change things ag ain is rude at best... IMHO. Thanks again Matt for ALL you do. Ben Haas do not archive Ben Haas N801BH www.haaspowerair.com -- "Jim McBurney" <jmcburney@pobox.com> wrote: I vote for split lists. Do not archive Blue skies and tailwinds Jim CH-801 DeltaHawk diesel Augusta GA 90% done, 90% left ======================== =========== ======================== =========== ======================== =========== ======================== =========== ____________________________________________________________ Protect your car's interior with great looking floor mats. Click here! http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2241/fc/Ioyw6i4uZ87SNTP7hnG8uVJjh AXdmPhwlXCX5NduIe8zjn46aDbjyK/


    Message 36


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:05:49 PM PST US
    From: "Carlos Sa" <carlossa52@gmail.com>
    Subject: copying holes
    How have you copied a hole pattern from one part to a new part, without damaging (i.e., making them bigger, oval) the existing holes? In my case, the wing ribs have already been drilled to A4 size, and I am going to discard the old skin. I think the least laborious way of doing this would be to back-drill the skin, from inside the wing. But how do I make sure I won't enlarge the holes on the ribs? Thanks in advance for your comments / suggestions. Carlos


    Message 37


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:25:13 PM PST US
    From: "raymondj" <raymondj@frontiernet.net>
    Subject: Re: do not assume
    This method will work IF you verify that parallel sided are the same length. Raymond Julian Kettle River, MN "Hope for the best, but prepare for the worst." ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bryan Martin" <bryanmmartin@comcast.net> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 5:27 PM Subject: Re: Zenith-List: do not assume > > If you want to know if a sheet of metal really is rectangular, measure > the distance from diagonally opposite corners. If both diagonal > measurements are exactly the same, you have a rectangle. The same method > can be used to verify that the rectangle you have marked up for cutting > actually is rectangular before you cut it. > > > On Jul 15, 2008, at 10:46 PM, Carlos Sa wrote: > >> So, you already know the bottom line to this note. >> Now please bear with me while I vent a little - and share a lesson. >> Eons ago, when I started building, I obsessed about getting a true >> straight edge (check archives, around late XXth century). >> I eventually settled on (1) accepting that the edge of a sheet 4x8 or >> 4x12 is straight and (2) an 8' melamine shelf as a "ruler". >> I also (3) assumed that an aluminum sheet, as delivered by the mill/ >> dealer, is rectangular. >> > > > -- > Bryan Martin > N61BM, CH 601 XL, > RAM Subaru, Stratus redrive. > do not archive. > > > 270.4.11/1553 - Release Date: 7/15/2008 5:48 AM > > >


    Message 38


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:48:27 PM PST US
    From: "Bill Flick" <rflick@ovalinternet.net>
    Subject: 601 cowl and subaru mt
    need a mt for a subaru in a 601hds and a cowl for the same, thanks ralph


    Message 39


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:20:05 PM PST US
    From: LarryMcFarland <larry@macsmachine.com>
    Subject: Re: Strategies for car gas at the airport
    Hi Craig, I purchased four 5-gallon red circular steel cans with a spring lid that's handle actuated. The can comes with a yellow spout that's perpendicular with the sides. These are OSHA compliant gasoline cans, unlike some very unstable plastic types. The spout doesn't leak and protects the splatter of a first pour. Great geometry for a gas can, especially for moving within a car. I need at least two more to equate the volume of my plane and have a spare in case there's ever a leak found or there's a need for fuel transfer, plane to car. Anything after 3 months, I begin to run the stuff through my car and refresh the hangar supply. Never had any trouble with the cans or the 87-octane that's stored in the hangar. http://www.stacksandstacks.com/track/rd.html?id=176&product_page=108984_5-gallon-gas-can-type-1&sku=108985&utm_medium=shoppingengine&utm_source=googlebase I'd recommend the can shown in the above link, Larry McFarland 601HDS at www.macsmachine.com Craig Payne wrote: > > The Rotax 912 prefers unleaded fuel. But there is none available at my > airport. I can burn 100LL if I add Decalin although there will be more > deposit build-up and I'll have to change oil more often. So I'm looking at > ways to haul car gas to the hanger. Since my 701 holds 20 gallons a couple > of 5 gal jerry cans isn't going to do it. And fueling a high-wing by hand > will be a challenge. I drive an SUV and not a pickup and I'm not wild about > hauling gas inside the car. But I will if I have to. And then there is the > whole issue of the shelf life of car gas. > > How do others do this? One idea is to just fill the car and pump gas from > the car's tank. But I think there is an anti-siphon/theft device on most car > tank filler necks. > > -- Craig > > >


    Message 40


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:09:18 PM PST US
    From: John Reinking <reinkings@comcast.net>
    Subject: Re: Answer: Five Years, Six Months and 16 days
    Bravo, Scott!!!! Another Eagle in the sky. John/Woodinville


    Message 41


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:04:41 PM PST US
    From: "Craig Spainhower" <n601xs@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: Strategies for car gas at the airport
    I just picked up a 12v Facet transfer pump from ACS, http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/eppages/facetFuelit.php, they have a special where they include the battery option for free. I have the opposite problem, I need to break in my engine with 100LL and the field I'm at is mostly ultra-lights and LSA's and they don't carry Avgas. I used 2 5-gal cans with my Cessna and just topped the plane off every time I drove to the airport. Craig S. N601XS, 601xl lyc 0-235


    Message 42


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:24:03 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Answer: Five Years, Six Months and 16 days
    From: "cookwithgas" <cookwithgas@HOTMAIL.COM>
    n4546v(at)mindspring.com wrote: > Do not archive > > So Scott: > > After all the advice and comments you requested and received, how about a > report on your check ride experience? > > Regards, > > Randy, Las Vegas > Randy: It was a long day. I got asked a lot of questions about safety and I was quizzed a lot about using a sectional chart. For the practical part, there is a free download from faa.gov called "Sport Pilot Test Standards" or FAA-S-8081-29. It has all of the requirements. Sooo my advice would be to study the FAR/AIM with an emphasis on the AIM. Make tabs in it for the different sections that apply to safety. Study your sectional charts and don't forget the legend area - study the legend - and lastly, read the SPTS over and practice the maneuvers with your solo flight time. Jon Croke asked me to write an article for the upcoming Zenith Newsletter so I will do that and include a lot more detail. Thanks Randy and take care, Scott. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=193276#193276


    Message 43


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:06:19 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: copying holes
    From: "Ron Lendon" <rlendon@comcast.net>
    That happened to me when I had to remake the nose skin. I just back drilled but I might have been at the silver cleco size. I did make a drill bushing to align some A-5's when I was working on the wing lockers. Take a look here: http://mykitlog.com/users/display_log.php?user=rlendon&project=113&category=0&log=59265&row=25 -------- Ron Lendon, Clinton Township, MI Corvair Zodiac XL, ScrapBuilder ;-) http://www.mykitlog.com/rlendon Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=193292#193292


    Message 44


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:14:50 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: do not assume
    From: "Ron Lendon" <rlendon@comcast.net>
    Carlos, The diagonal measure is the quickest and most accurate to find out if it's square. I have been using a full sheet of metal as a straight edge for making cuts, using the factory edge. Just set two sheets up, one is the part the top piece is the cut guide. -------- Ron Lendon, Clinton Township, MI Corvair Zodiac XL, ScrapBuilder ;-) http://www.mykitlog.com/rlendon Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=193295#193295


    Message 45


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:21:05 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Answer: Five Years, Six Months and 16 days
    From: "Ron Lendon" <rlendon@comcast.net>
    Congratulations Scott, I have learned much watching your progress over the years. One day we will meet. Enjoy, -------- Ron Lendon, Clinton Township, MI Corvair Zodiac XL, ScrapBuilder ;-) http://www.mykitlog.com/rlendon Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=193296#193296


    Message 46


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:34:36 PM PST US
    From: "Craig Payne" <craig@craigandjean.com>
    Subject: Strategies for car gas at the airport
    Ah! Good idea to track the date of the gas and put the old in the car. Thanks for the lead on the can. -- Craig -----Original Message----- From: owner-zenith-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-zenith-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of LarryMcFarland Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 6:17 PM Subject: Re: Zenith-List: Strategies for car gas at the airport Hi Craig, I purchased four 5-gallon red circular steel cans with a spring lid that's handle actuated. The can comes with a yellow spout that's perpendicular with the sides. These are OSHA compliant gasoline cans, unlike some very unstable plastic types. The spout doesn't leak and protects the splatter of a first pour. Great geometry for a gas can, especially for moving within a car. I need at least two more to equate the volume of my plane and have a spare in case there's ever a leak found or there's a need for fuel transfer, plane to car. Anything after 3 months, I begin to run the stuff through my car and refresh the hangar supply. Never had any trouble with the cans or the 87-octane that's stored in the hangar. http://www.stacksandstacks.com/track/rd.html?id=176&product_page=108984_5-ga llon-gas-can-type-1&sku=108985&utm_medium=shoppingengine&utm_source=googleba se I'd recommend the can shown in the above link, Larry McFarland 601HDS at www.macsmachine.com Craig Payne wrote: > > The Rotax 912 prefers unleaded fuel. But there is none available at my > airport. I can burn 100LL if I add Decalin although there will be more > deposit build-up and I'll have to change oil more often. So I'm looking at > ways to haul car gas to the hanger. Since my 701 holds 20 gallons a couple > of 5 gal jerry cans isn't going to do it. And fueling a high-wing by hand > will be a challenge. I drive an SUV and not a pickup and I'm not wild about > hauling gas inside the car. But I will if I have to. And then there is the > whole issue of the shelf life of car gas. > > How do others do this? One idea is to just fill the car and pump gas from > the car's tank. But I think there is an anti-siphon/theft device on most car > tank filler necks. > > -- Craig > > >


    Message 47


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:59:33 PM PST US
    From: "Dr. Andrew Elliott" <a.s.elliott@cox.net>
    Subject: New seats from Flightcrafters
    Gang: Got my new-style, gray colored, hot-weather seats from Flightcrafters today. These have a medium gray cloth center section and slightly lighter vinyl outside that on both seat bottom and back. Side panels are vinyl covered and have a matching cloth insert which looks pretty nice. Top of seat backs have the Zenith logo embroidered in place. Center console section is pre-sewn to fit. All the seat parts and console have appropriate Velcro to install in the plane. Appears to be nice workmanship. Came with a small piece (about 1'x3') of extra vinyl material IMHO, a nice option from the all UltraLeather seats, which are just too uncomfortable here in the baking Arizona sun. Also offered in a tan/brown combination. Same price as the UltraLeather set = $985 + shipping. Andy Elliott, Mesa, AZ N601GE (reserved) 601XL/TD, Corvair, building...




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   zenith-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Zenith-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/zenith-list
  • Browse Zenith-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/zenith-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --