Zenith-List Digest Archive

Tue 07/29/08


Total Messages Posted: 25



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 04:01 AM - Re: Re: Chris Heintz letter (Frank Roskind)
     2. 04:13 AM - Re: Chris Heintz letter (ashontz)
     3. 04:21 AM - Re: CH 650 LS (chris Sinfield)
     4. 06:06 AM - Re: Re: CH 650 LS (LHusky@aol.com)
     5. 06:28 AM - HDS Project For Sale (Gary Boothe)
     6. 06:35 AM - Re: New Panel Design (Gig Giacona)
     7. 06:44 AM - Re: CH 650 LS (Sabrina)
     8. 07:16 AM - Re: CH 650 LS (Scotsman)
     9. 10:16 AM - Re: Corvair Fuel Lines (Terry Phillips)
    10. 01:10 PM - Re: New Panel Design (John Marzulli)
    11. 01:25 PM - New Canopy can be put on a 601XL (Joe Scheibinger)
    12. 01:55 PM - Re: New Canopy can be put on a 601XL (chris Sinfield)
    13. 02:16 PM - Local Newspaper Coverage (PatrickW)
    14. 02:23 PM - Re: New Panel Design (Dan Lykowski)
    15. 02:42 PM - Re: New Canopy can be put on a 601XL (Gig Giacona)
    16. 03:34 PM - Re: Re: ch601 hds BUNGEE HELP!!! (Roger & Lina Hill)
    17. 04:42 PM - Re: New Canopy can be put on a 601XL (Juan Vega)
    18. 05:08 PM - Re: Re: New Canopy can be put on a 601XL (Jay Maynard)
    19. 05:36 PM - Historical uses of the "F" Word per Amelia Earhart (Juan Vega)
    20. 06:51 PM - Rubber wing root moulding (dingfelder)
    21. 07:17 PM - Re: Rubber wing root moulding (Ashley)
    22. 07:37 PM - Re: Rubber wing root moulding (LHusky@aol.com)
    23. 07:41 PM - Re: Ch 650 is now on the Zenith web site (craig@craigandjean.com)
    24. 07:55 PM - Re: New Panel Design (craig@craigandjean.com)
    25. 08:55 PM - 750, 650 and other Zenith aircraft shots from Oshkosh (craig@craigandjean.com)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:01:47 AM PST US
    From: Frank Roskind <frankroskind@HOTMAIL.COM>
    Subject: Re: Chris Heintz letter
    There is no design defect in a plane that is subject to flutter if the cabl es are not tightened in accordance with standard maintenance procedures=2C any more than there was a design defect in the DC-10 which lost an engine a nd crashed because some moron used a forklift to install an engine=2C there by cracking the engine mount. If ordinary care in maintenance can prevent an accident=2C then the design is not flawed.> Date: Mon=2C 28 Jul 2008 21: 51:41 -0400> From: amyvega2005@earthlink.net> To: zenith-list@matronics.com =3B zenith-list@matronics.com> Subject: Re: Zenith-List: Re: Chris Heintz l k.net>> > Its not a high performance plane=2C thats what he is trying to ty ell people. Flutter is not a big deal on this plane as the design does not hit a resonance. Keep the cables tight per the plans and you should be fine . If you got a flutter=2C just slow it down and land and tighten the cables . I don't know where you got that this points the finger at the previous ac cidents. Scratching my head on that one.> > Juan> > -----Original Message-- ---> >From: ashontz <ashontz@nbme.org>> >Sent: Jul 28=2C 2008 4:22 PM> >To: zenith-list@matronics.com> >Subject: Zenith-List: Re: Chris Heintz letter> 'm going to guess this was the problem in the couple of in-flight breakups that occurred. It's possible the XL has more aero-elasticity than the HD or HDS that may make cable tension more critical in the XL=2C not that you sh ould ever have loose cables=2C but the XL may be less forgiving with the fu ll 12' wing panels as opposed to the center wing and shorter outer panels o f the HD and HDS.> >> >I'm thinking the XL may be more suited to push-pull tubes for controls as well as control surface balancing. Between the two of them=2C there'd probably never be a problem related to flutter. It's just a high performance plane.> >> >--------> >Andy Shontz> >> >do not archive> >> >CH601XL - Corvair> >www.mykitlog.com/ashontz> >> >> >> >> >Read this to pic online here:> >> >http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=195403# ===================> > > _________________________________________________________________ With Windows Live for mobile=2C your contacts travel with you. http://www.windowslive.com/mobile/overview.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_mobile_ 072008


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:13:44 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Chris Heintz letter
    From: "ashontz" <ashontz@nbme.org>
    Certainly more high performance than a c-152. The faster you go, the higher the likelihood of flutter. No design defect, that's just the nature of the beast. amyvega2005(at)earthlink. wrote: > Its not a high performance plane, thats what he is trying to tyell people. Flutter is not a big deal on this plane as the design does not hit a resonance. Keep the cables tight per the plans and you should be fine. If you got a flutter, just slow it down and land and tighten the cables. I don't know where you got that this points the finger at the previous accidents. Scratching my head on that one. > > Juan > > -- -------- Andy Shontz do not archive CH601XL - Corvair www.mykitlog.com/ashontz Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=195511#195511


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:21:08 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: CH 650 LS
    From: "chris Sinfield" <chris_sinfield@yahoo.com.au>
    Sabrina There appears to be a new cross support in the wing between the ribs behind the fuel tank. Compare I think that is the support for the wing locker option as I have that in my XL.. I think it would be very easy to add the extra cross L angles in the rear fuse at any time before paint. Zenith have said the new canopy locking system can be fitted to any existing XL with some modifications to get rid of the 2 stage locking system. Chris.. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=195513#195513


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:06:22 AM PST US
    From: LHusky@aol.com
    Subject: Re: CH 650 LS
    Does anyone have enough information to determine if the new wings can be retrofitted to an XL fuselage? Larry Husky Madras, Oregon In a message dated 7/29/2008 4:21:58 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, chris_sinfield@yahoo.com.au writes: --> Zenith-List message posted by: "chris Sinfield" <chris_sinfield@yahoo.com.au> Sabrina There appears to be a new cross support in the wing between the ribs behind the fuel tank. Compare I think that is the support for the wing locker option as I have that in my XL.. I think it would be very easy to add the extra cross L angles in the rear fuse at any time before paint. Zenith have said the new canopy locking system can be fitted to any existing XL with some modifications to get rid of the 2 stage locking system. Chris.. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=195513#195513 **************Get fantasy football with free live scoring. Sign up for FanHouse Fantasy Football today. (http://www.fanhouse.com/fantasyaffair?ncid=aolspr00050000000020)


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:28:19 AM PST US
    From: "Gary Boothe" <gboothe@calply.com>
    Subject: HDS Project For Sale
    List, I hope you don=92t mind that I remind the list from time to time that my project is for sale. The tail group is complete, wings have been sold, and the center section is about =BD done with gear set up for a tail-dragger. Everything is in swinging cradles that store the parts up high in my garage, so they are out of the way while I work on my Piet, in case NOW is not a good time for someone to pick them up or have them shipped. I can be contacted off list at: gboothe5@comcast.net. Engine is not for sale. Gary Boothe Cool, CA 601 HDSTD, WW Conversion 90% done, Tail done, wings done, working on c-section


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:35:37 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: New Panel Design
    From: "Gig Giacona" <wrgiacona@gmail.com>
    I hate you guys. You are releasing those just far enough in the future that they aren't an option for me. Guess I'll just have to live with the 180. Poor, poor pitiful me. lykowdk wrote: > Ok.. So its a selfless plug.. I have been itching to show these off for months.. > > More info at www.dynonavionics.com > > Dan Lykowski > Dynon Avionics -------- W.R. &quot;Gig&quot; Giacona 601XL Under Construction See my progress at www.peoamerica.net/N601WR Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=195528#195528


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:44:52 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: CH 650 LS
    From: "Sabrina" <chicago2paris@msn.com>
    >From what I am told, it is the fuselage that has changed... you seem correct that the cross member is the wing locker support, but it appears to be in there with or without the wing locker. So if the wings are not closed up, the cross support could be added very easily to your wing. It is the consensus of those I have talked to that the ripples and depressions on the leading edge are NOT designed into it, the wings just came out that way. I too, wish CH were here. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=195531#195531


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:16:25 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: CH 650 LS
    From: "Scotsman" <james.roberts@computershare.co.za>
    I think that the new canopy etc is a real improvement on the previous version. Does anyone know if you can, reasonably simply, fit the 650 canopy arrangement to a standard XL as it just looks like a revised canopy with an additional chunk removed from the upper fuselage skin of the XL version? Cheers j Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=195535#195535


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:16:33 AM PST US
    From: Terry Phillips <ttp44@rkymtn.net>
    Subject: Corvair Fuel Lines
    Paul The recommended tubing size for aluminum fuel lines is 3/8". But metal tubes are sold by outside diameter. The rubber tubing supplied by ZAC is sold by inside diameter, so ZAC's tubing is 1/4" i.d., which is about the same i.d. as 3/8" aluminum tubing. The 1/4" ZAC supplied tubing should be just fine. Terry At 08:07 PM 7/28/2008 -0500, you wrote: >Paul; > > >When in doubt, up ya go=85why take a chance=85.go 3/8 all the way !!!! > > >Roger > > >---------- >From: owner-zenith-list-server@matronics.com >[mailto:owner-zenith-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of paulrod36@msn.com >Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 1:58 PM >To: zenith-list >Subject: Zenith-List: Corvair Fuel Lines > > >Now that I'm about to start on the plumbing, I'm wondering aobut the >capacity of the 1/4" fuel lines supplied by Zenith---- Are they sufficient >to feed a Corvair engine at full throttle, or should I move up to 3/8" >lines? Any consensus out there? > > >Paul Rodriguez > >601XL/Corvair Terry Phillips ZBAGer ttp44~at~rkymtn.net Corvallis MT 601XL/Jab 3300 s .. l .. o .. o .. w build kit - Tail, flaps, & ailerons are done; working on the wings http://www.mykitlog.com/N47TP/


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:10:39 PM PST US
    From: "John Marzulli" <john.marzulli@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: New Panel Design
    If it were me... I would move the Dynons ( why not a Grand Rapids ;-) ) further towards the center so you have more edge room on the panels. Looks good though. DO NOT ARCHIVE! John Marzulli http://701Builder.blogspot.com/ http://www.GenevieveMarzulli.org/ http://www.JohnMarzulli.net/ On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:33 PM, lykowdk <engineerguy3737@yahoo.com> wrote: > > So, I spent some time laying out a new panel for my 601.. [Shocked] > Any thoughts? :D > > Dan Lykowski > Dynon Avionics > > > Read this topic online here: > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=195499#195499 > > > Attachments: > > http://forums.matronics.com//files/dscf0512_c_170.jpg > >


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:25:36 PM PST US
    From: "Joe Scheibinger" <backstagelive@gmail.com>
    Subject: New Canopy can be put on a 601XL
    I had the chance to look over the new canopy on the 650 and it is much simpler than the 601. No more cables or aluminum fairings! Much more head room for taller guys. The folks in the tent say that Zenith will make a retro fit canopy kit for 601 builders for a couple of grand that will include the new roll bar! Seeing that I cracked my canopy, this might be the way to go. All I have to do is buy a new rudder and I have a 650! Almost. My hats off to the zodiac gang for making some great new changes. The new 750 also looks like a winner. This sure makes Oshkosh exciting this year! E-mail me if you want me to send you some pictures I took today. Joe in Oshkosh


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:55:48 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: New Canopy can be put on a 601XL
    From: "chris Sinfield" <chris_sinfield@yahoo.com.au>
    Joe Did they say why the rudder changed? did they say why the other improvements at all? Chris Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=195614#195614


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:16:19 PM PST US
    Subject: Local Newspaper Coverage
    From: "PatrickW" <pwhoyt@yahoo.com>
    Reporters from the Minneapolis Star Tribune came over to my house and interviewed me and took some pictures of my project, and put some video on their website. http://www.startribune.com/lifestyle/25898184.html?location_refer=Homepage:highlightModules:7 - Patrick -------- Patrick 601XL/Corvair N63PZ (reserved) Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=195620#195620


    Message 14


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:23:42 PM PST US
    From: Dan Lykowski <engineerguy3737@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: New Panel Design
    Thanks for the suggestion.. Actually a couple people have suggested I move them further in.. LOL.. I honestly just randomly taped them to the panel to show them off. Depending on how things work out, I may start with the 7's and upgrade to a pair of 10's eventually once we release our Com radio and transponder. ( I won't need the panel space for radios ) Why not Grand Rapids? LOL.. Because Dynons are the Best! and the price is right. ;) Just in case anyone out there was wondering how my fuselage just seemed to have appeared.. I was the person who bought the $1500 deal in Lynnwood, WA about a week ago. It was right down the road from me, and the workmanship was excellent. It was just a little more complete than a Quickbuild. Dan Lykowski Dynon Avionics Software Engineer 601XL --- On Tue, 7/29/08, John Marzulli <john.marzulli@gmail.com> wrote: > From: John Marzulli <john.marzulli@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: Zenith-List: New Panel Design > To: zenith-list@matronics.com > Date: Tuesday, July 29, 2008, 4:07 PM > If it were me... > > I would move the Dynons ( why not a Grand Rapids ;-) ) > further towards the > center so you have more edge room on the panels. > > Looks good though. > > DO NOT ARCHIVE! > > John Marzulli > > http://701Builder.blogspot.com/ > http://www.GenevieveMarzulli.org/ > http://www.JohnMarzulli.net/ > > > On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:33 PM, lykowdk > <engineerguy3737@yahoo.com> wrote: > > "lykowdk" <engineerguy3737@yahoo.com> > > > > So, I spent some time laying out a new panel for my > 601.. [Shocked] > > Any thoughts? :D > > > > Dan Lykowski > > Dynon Avionics > > > > > > > > > > Read this topic online here: > > > > > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=195499#195499 > > > > > > > > > > Attachments: > > > > http://forums.matronics.com//files/dscf0512_c_170.jpg > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >


    Message 15


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:42:21 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: New Canopy can be put on a 601XL
    From: "Gig Giacona" <wrgiacona@gmail.com>
    The canopy change is obvious. The current canopy SUCKS. It is complex and hard to build. As far as the rudder they probably did it for the same reason Cessna back in day. It looks better. Just because a company makes a change doesn't mean that there was something wrong with the earlier version. When the 601 was first designed the LSA rules were a dream. When the XL was designed the LSA rules had not been written and factory production of the plane was probably at best an after thought. Nobody asks why when Chevy updates their pick-up truck. chris Sinfield wrote: > Joe > Did they say why the rudder changed? > did they say why the other improvements at all? > Chris -------- W.R. &quot;Gig&quot; Giacona 601XL Under Construction See my progress at www.peoamerica.net/N601WR Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=195623#195623


    Message 16


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:34:49 PM PST US
    From: "Roger & Lina Hill" <hills@sunflower.com>
    Subject: Re: ch601 hds BUNGEE HELP!!!
    Klaus; Thanks for the info, I am getting the "gear change kit" from McFarland, he has pics of it on his site and he has agreed to build me a kit. Thanks again Roger -----Original Message----- From: owner-zenith-list-server@matronics.com [mailto:owner-zenith-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Klaus Truemper Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 10:05 AM Subject: Zenith-List: Re: ch601 hds BUNGEE HELP!!! Hi Roger, While the plane is on the ground, you can remove the top cap since it will not be at the stop. You can also remove the bolts under that wing, holding the gear in place, assuming that you have already disconnected the brake line. Now when you slowly raise the wing with a jack, the gear will come out of the gear box. The reverse process is more difficult, since the bungees preload the gear, and the bungees must be stretched if the gear tube is to stick out a bit above the wing. There are two ways to do this. First, you can use longer bolts with the top retaining cap and gradually pull up the tube from the top. When you cannot turn the bolts any more, you lower the wing so that the weight of the plane holds the gear up, remove one bolt at a time and add washers, and repeat the process until you have pulled up the tube to add the retaining plate with the originial bolts. Another solution that makes subsequent bungee changes really easy, is described on the page http://utdallas.edu/~klaus/Airplane/gear_stop_by_bolt.html Happy flying, Klaus


    Message 17


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:42:35 PM PST US
    From: Juan Vega <amyvega2005@earthlink.net>
    Subject: Re: New Canopy can be put on a 601XL
    JOe, sock it to me! shoot me some pics!. I am jealous of all at OSH.. next year with Josh in the plane is the plane. As the old sayiing goes " if you want to hear God laugh, tell him your plans" Juan -----Original Message----- >From: Joe Scheibinger <backstagelive@gmail.com> >Sent: Jul 29, 2008 4:22 PM >To: zenith-list@matronics.com >Subject: Zenith-List: New Canopy can be put on a 601XL > > >I had the chance to look over the new canopy on the 650 and it is much >simpler than the 601. No more cables or aluminum fairings! Much more head >room for taller guys. The folks in the tent say that Zenith will make a >retro fit canopy kit for 601 builders for a couple of grand that will >include the new roll bar! Seeing that I cracked my canopy, this might be the >way to go. All I have to do is buy a new rudder and I have a 650! Almost. My >hats off to the zodiac gang for making some great new changes. The new 750 >also looks like a winner. This sure makes Oshkosh exciting this year! E-mail >me if you want me to send you some pictures I took today. > >Joe in Oshkosh > >


    Message 18


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:08:31 PM PST US
    From: Jay Maynard <jmaynard@conmicro.com>
    Subject: Re: New Canopy can be put on a 601XL
    On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 02:39:48PM -0700, Gig Giacona wrote: > The canopy change is obvious. The current canopy SUCKS. It is complex and > hard to build. When I first saw the new one, Imy first thought was that homebuilders would love it. I'm still of two minds about it, purely from an owning standpoint: less baggage room, and not hidden from view. -- Jay Maynard, K5ZC http://www.conmicro.com http://jmaynard.livejournal.com http://www.tronguy.net Fairmont, MN (FRM) (Yes, that's me!) AMD Zodiac CH601XLi N55ZC (got it!)


    Message 19


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:36:19 PM PST US
    From: Juan Vega <amyvega2005@earthlink.net>
    Subject: Historical uses of the "F" Word per Amelia Earhart
    Acceptable use of the "F" word Acceptable use of the "F" word The F-word: We all know that it isn't polite to use the F-word. However, there are ten times in history where the "F" word has been acceptable for use: 10. "What the fuck was that?" - Mayor Of Hiroshima, 1945 9. "Look at all them fucking Indians!" - Custer, 1877 8. "Any fucking idiot could understand that." - Einstein, 1938 7. "It does so fucking look like her!" - Picasso, 1926 6. "How the fuck did you work that out?" - Pythagoras, 126 BC 5. "You want WHAT on the fucking ceiling?" - Michelangelo, 1566 4. "Where the fuck are we?" - Amelia Earhart, 1937 3. "Scattered fucking showers, my ass!" - Noah, 4314 BC 2. "Aw c'mon. Who the fuck's going to find out?"- Bill Clinton,1999 And Number 1 . . . drum roll . . . . 1. "Geez, I didn't think they'd get this fucking mad." - Saddam Hussein, 2003


    Message 20


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:51:00 PM PST US
    From: "dingfelder" <ding@tbscc.com>
    Subject: Rubber wing root moulding
    You guys and gals who have completed your wing installation -- Have you glued the rubber root moulding to the wing or just slipped it in place and installed the wing? Lynn Corry, PA 601XL / Corvair


    Message 21


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:17:31 PM PST US
    From: "Ashley" <ashleyw@gvtc.com>
    Subject: Re: Rubber wing root moulding
    Glued mine. Floyd Wilkes 601XL O-200 ----- Original Message ----- From: dingfelder To: zenith-list@matronics.com Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 8:47 PM Subject: Zenith-List: Rubber wing root moulding You guys and gals who have completed your wing installation -- Have you glued the rubber root moulding to the wing or just slipped it in place and installed the wing? Lynn Corry, PA 601XL / Corvair


    Message 22


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:37:29 PM PST US
    From: LHusky@aol.com
    Subject: Re: Rubber wing root moulding
    I came from New Mexico, where a guy was parting out his XL and then destroying the airframe. This was a factory plane and the molding was glued on. I plan on doing mine the same way. Larry Husky Madras, Oregon In a message dated 7/29/2008 6:51:50 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, ding@tbscc.com writes: You guys and gals who have completed your wing installation -- Have you glued the rubber root moulding to the wing or just slipped it in place and installed the wing? Lynn Corry, PA 601XL / Corvair (http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List) (http://www.matronics.com/contribution) **************Get fantasy football with free live scoring. Sign up for FanHouse Fantasy Football today. (http://www.fanhouse.com/fantasyaffair?ncid=aolspr00050000000020)


    Message 23


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:41:06 PM PST US
    From: craig@craigandjean.com
    Subject: Ch 650 is now on the Zenith web site
    > Looks good to me also, I wonder if my 601xl wing kit can be used with > a new 650 fuselage kit. Some Zenith staff member (Caleb?) at Oshkosh said the wings were compatible. Double-check this with them directly after Oshkosh. -- Craig


    Message 24


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:55:47 PM PST US
    From: craig@craigandjean.com
    Subject: Re: New Panel Design
    > Ok.. So its a selfless plug.. I have been itching to show these off > for months.. Congratulations on your new baby. But why don't you design in an MGL Odyssey (shipping since the beginning of the year) or Voyager - then you wouldn't have to wait until 2009 for a large screen EFIS ;-) There were working Voyagers from the first production run in the MGL and SteinAir booths (next to the Dynon demo). Just kidding - I'm sure the new Dynons will be as useful and popular as the current products. -- Craig


    Message 25


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:55:22 PM PST US
    From: craig@craigandjean.com
    Subject: 750, 650 and other Zenith aircraft shots from Oshkosh
    The 750 has streamlined main and jury struts. Also a single picture of the Zenith 6000001 Dream Lifter. -- Craig




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   zenith-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Zenith-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/zenith-list
  • Browse Zenith-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/zenith-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --