Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 07:04 AM - Re: 601 vs 650 (Juan Vega)
2. 07:43 AM - Re: 601 vs 650 (Jay Maynard)
3. 10:20 AM - 650 and BSR chute (mfazio0001@comcast.net)
4. 11:15 AM - Re: 650 and BSR chute (Larry Winger)
5. 11:24 AM - Re: 650 and BSR chute (Gig Giacona)
6. 12:57 PM - Re: 91 octane, time to be heard! (leinad)
7. 01:02 PM - Automotive Conversions Vol 3 (LarryMcFarland)
8. 03:24 PM - fiberglass mold making questions (leinad)
9. 04:33 PM - Re: fiberglass mold making questions (LarryMcFarland)
10. 07:04 PM - Re: 91 octane, time to be heard! (Roger Lee)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Jay,
you hould be concerned on the AMD, every cable on anny plane stretches, AMD does
great work, but cables stretch regardless of maker.
Piece of mind Bro, check them just for that and you will be fine.
Juan
-----Original Message-----
>From: Jay Maynard <jmaynard@conmicro.com>
>Sent: Aug 7, 2008 9:22 PM
>To: zenith-list@matronics.com
>Subject: Re: Zenith-List: 601 vs 650
>
>
>On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 09:06:35PM -0400, Ken Lilja wrote:
>> The cables will stretch and the structure will settle. I will check it
>> every few flights for maybe the first 50 -100 hours. Also checking when
>> the weather warms up and cools down through the year is not a bad idea.
>> Erring to the high side is much better than erring to the low side.
>
>Mathieu Heintz told me he recommended I flip the seat forward and make sure
>the aileron cables twanged when I pluck them on preflight. I've added it to
>the list. (I'm not too concerned about my AMD Zodiac's cables loosening,
>since they're pretensioned when the ends are swaged on, but it's still
>something I'll check.)
>--
>Jay Maynard, K5ZC http://www.conmicro.com
>http://jmaynard.livejournal.com http://www.tronguy.net
>Fairmont, MN (FRM) (Yes, that's me!)
>AMD Zodiac CH601XLi N55ZC (got it!)
>
>
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 10:03:21AM -0400, Juan Vega wrote:
> Jay Maynard wrote:
> >Mathieu Heintz told me he recommended I flip the seat forward and make
> >sure the aileron cables twanged when I pluck them on preflight. I've
> >added it to the list. (I'm not too concerned about my AMD Zodiac's cables
> >loosening, since they're pretensioned when the ends are swaged on, but
> >it's still something I'll check.)
> you hould be concerned on the AMD, every cable on anny plane stretches, AMD
does great work, but cables stretch regardless of maker.
> Piece of mind Bro, check them just for that and you will be fine.
Oh, I know they stretch. I said I'm not too worried, not that I'm not
worried at all...and that's why it goes on the preflight list.
--
Jay Maynard, K5ZC http://www.conmicro.com
http://jmaynard.livejournal.com http://www.tronguy.net
Fairmont, MN (FRM) (Yes, that's me!)
AMD Zodiac CH601XLi N55ZC (got it!)
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | 650 and BSR chute |
I love the new 650 - with the 601 I was considering the possibility of adding a
ballistic chute as Scott has done which was installed in the baggage compartment.
With the new 650 design could a chute be installed? Seems you would have
to mount it up against the canopy, (doesn't seem very practical or attractive)
or move it farther back on the turtle deck ( seems weight and balance would be
an issue).
I tend to think the chute is a bit of overkill as I trust the design but just considering
the options.
Mike
<html><body>
<DIV>I love the new 650 - with the 601 I was considering the possibility of adding
a ballistic chute as Scott has done which was installed in the baggage compartment.
With the new 650 design could a chute be installed? Seems you would
have to mount it up against the canopy, (doesn't seem very practical or attractive)
or move it farther back on the turtle deck ( seems weight and balance would
be an issue). </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I tend to think the chute is a bit of overkill as I trust the design but just
considering the options.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Mike</DIV>
<pre><b><font size=2 color="#000000" face="courier new,courier">
</b></font></pre></body></html>
Message 4
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: 650 and BSR chute |
I spoke with Roger at ZAC today, and he said that AMD is making the 650 with
the BRS behind the new baggage back bulkhead. Yes, it does shift the CG
back a bit, but it also protects the BRS from getting fouled with other
personal baggage. One of the only other issues I'm wondering about is
access for maintenance, but I'm sure they figured it out. When I get
specific installation info from AMD, I'll try to post it here. Hopefully
others will do the same.
Larry Winger
Tustin, CA
Plans building 601XL/650 with Corvair
Fuse 50%
Wings and control surfaces done.
Message 5
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: 650 and BSR chute |
lwinger wrote:
> One of the only other issues I'm wondering about is access for maintenance,
but I'm sure they figured it out.
Just a wild guess but probably through the "bomb bay" access in the floor of the
rear fuselage.
--------
W.R. "Gig" Giacona
601XL Under Construction
See my progress at www.peoamerica.net/N601WR
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=197372#197372
Message 6
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: 91 octane, time to be heard! |
Roger,
I see absolutely nothing wrong with what she has written. It falls in line exactly
with what I was taught 10 years ago when in the ground schooling phase of
pilot training. Avgas has always been made using stricter standards than mogas.
I'm not in favor of requiring the gas i put in my car to be made with the
same high (and costly) standards used in the production of aviation fuel. I
think it's a good idea that these companies from time to time reminder pilots
that if they choose to use mogas, they should no the risks.
Dan
Roger Lee wrote:
> If you are happy with just 100LL stop here. You won't like where this is going.
>
> This effects us all even in other countries because one tends to follow the other
at some point.
> If you are tired of someone saying we can't have 91 octane, read on. It's time
to pick a side and take 5 minutes to email. Our lives as people are good because
someone didn't just say ok. Some took the time to make change and made it
better for all of us. If we choose to sit on the sideline and just go along then
we deserve what we get. I would implore all to take a minute and email these
two people and any other fuel administrator in other companies. I will post
on as many aviation websites as possible and I would you all to pick a side and
stand up to be heard and maybe, just maybe we might effect change. I for one
don't want to roll over. You are about to read a bulletin about the use of Chevron
ground fuel verses aviation fuel. Then I have a response.
>
> Don't sit back and pick my memo apart, use that time to write your own and be
heard. Post this on all your aviation websites. Let them hear a nation wide voice.
>
> Send your emails to:
>
> LIMG(at)chevron.com
> kayalbitz(at)chevron.com
>
> or any other fuel company administrator.
--------
Scratch building XL with Corvair Engine
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=197392#197392
Message 7
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Automotive Conversions Vol 3 |
HI Guys,
Ive just gotten into the 3^rd Volume of Alternative Engines and its
really great read. 56 articles and project studies have a lot of
conversion information on specific automotive, turbine, diesel and turbo
engines, including Subaru. Each includes a complete descriptive of the
electronic ignition, fuel systems, cooling, mechanicals, installation
variations and performance. Special articles on radiators installation
and sizing, evaluating engine performance, re-drives, planetary, geared
and belted are described for large and small engines. Considerably
strong outlines on the EA81 and the EJ22 Subaru are provided to also
compare them with air-cooled TC engines. Both are described as used with
belted or direct drive props for 100 to 130 hp.
The 3^rd Volume's illustrations drawings and photos are 1000-word
quality, well worth the price for someone considering an alternative
engine. The automotive- conversion can save you a whole lot on initial
purchase, fuel and general maintenance.
For those who would ask, its $42.00, ordered thru
www.ContactMagazine.com <http://www.contactmagazine.com/> or by phone at
1-559-584-3306.
Fly Safe,
Larry McFarland 601HDS at www.macsmachine.com
Message 8
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | fiberglass mold making questions |
I've made my form, and have materials to make the mold, but I have some questions.
When laying up fiberglass the instructions I've seen talk about using a paint brush
to apply the resin. Does this mean I need one paint brush (to throw away)
per layer of glass?
I've seen instructions from one source that used only 3 layers of glass for the
mold and 2 for the parts. Another used 14 layers for the mold and didn't say
how many for the parts. For stabilizer tips does someone have a recommendation?
Dan
601XL plans builder
--------
Scratch building XL with Corvair Engine
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=197431#197431
Message 9
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: fiberglass mold making questions |
Hi,
You only need two layers of a 9-ounce cloth to do the product in the
mold. Assumed you've paste waxed the mold several times and buffed it.
A brush is used to wet the mold with activated resin, then lay the
pre-trimmed cloth in the mold,
wet the cloth with more resin, apply the second layer of cloth and wet
the inside until the cloth until both layers are wet. Stipple the
bubbles from the cloth
at each layer and allow only 20-minutes to get all this done. To save
the brush, keep a jar of acetone handy to clean it and wipe it with a
bunch of paper towels.
Don't do this without throw-away latex gloves. I'm assuming your using
a polyester resin , so do use a respirator.
Larry McFarland 601HDS at www.macsmachine.com
leinad wrote:
>
> I've made my form, and have materials to make the mold, but I have some questions.
> When laying up fiberglass the instructions I've seen talk about using a paint
brush to apply the resin. Does this mean I need one paint brush (to throw away)
per layer of glass?
> I've seen instructions from one source that used only 3 layers of glass for the
mold and 2 for the parts. Another used 14 layers for the mold and didn't say
how many for the parts. For stabilizer tips does someone have a recommendation?
> Dan
> 601XL plans builder
>
> --------
> Scratch building XL with Corvair Engine
>
>
>
Message 10
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: 91 octane, time to be heard! |
Hi Dan,
Most pilots are educated to the problems with 91 octane and ethanol. Many Mfgs.
recommend that you use 91 over the 100LL because lead is more damaging to engines.
I believe the EPA has a ruling that 100LL suppliers have to have a new fuel
by 2010 because of the lead you breath and exhaust. ground based fuel has
been in aviation use since the Wright Brother's flew. It is a huge part of the
aviation community today. there are 280 aircraft at my field and over half can
use 91 and they signed a petition saying so. There is a new fuel being tested.
There is a new no lead 100 fuel being tested.
--------
Roger Lee
Tucson, Az.
Light Sport Repairman - Maintenance Rated
Rotax Service Center
520-574-1080
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=197461#197461
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|