Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 04:21 AM - Re: Re: Re: IFR Qualifications (Paul Mulwitz)
     2. 05:48 AM - Re: Re: Re: IFR Qualifications (Jay Maynard)
     3. 06:43 AM - Re: Re: Re: IFR Qualifications (Jimbo)
     4. 06:47 AM - Re: Re: Re: IFR Qualifications (Juan Vega)
     5. 07:50 AM - Re: Re: Re: IFR Qualifications (Paul Mulwitz)
     6. 09:04 AM - Re: Re: Re: IFR Qualifications (Craig Payne)
     7. 09:16 AM - Re: IFR Qualifications (Gig Giacona)
     8. 09:19 AM - Re: Re: Re: IFR Qualifications (Craig Payne)
     9. 09:25 AM - Re: Re: Re: IFR Qualifications (Jay Maynard)
    10. 09:55 AM - Re: Re: Re: IFR Qualifications (MaxNr@aol.com)
    11. 10:45 AM - Zodiac 650 HD? I Guess That's what I'll Call It (MHerder)
    12. 04:55 PM - Re: News from Magnificent Machine (leinad)
 
 
 
Message 1
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: RE: Re: IFR Qualifications | 
      
      
      Hi Craig,
      
      I'm afraid you still failed to cover all single 
      point failures on your "Dual" system.
      
      What if the plane gets hit by lightning and all 
      the electrics are wiped out?  For this event you 
      still need a VACUUM driven gyro.
      
      Paul
      XL getting close
      do not archive
      
      At 10:55 PM 2/11/2009, you wrote:
      
      >Of course I understand the downside of losing 
      >one EFIS. Thats why my original response 
      >described dual units. For maximum reliability 
      >buy two different brands of EFIS  that 
      >insulates you from seeing the same bug on both displays.
      >
      >
      
      
Message 2
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: RE: Re: IFR Qualifications | 
      
      
      On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 04:19:53AM -0800, Paul Mulwitz wrote:
      > What if the plane gets hit by lightning and all the electrics are wiped 
      > out?  For this event you still need a VACUUM driven gyro.
      
      AMD uses all electric gyros...and their aircraft have all of the lightning
      protection required by the current FAR part 23. There is no vacuum pump in
      my airplane. Vacuum pumps fail much, much more often than aircraft get hit
      by lightning. The FAA apparently doesn't consider it a serious risk, or else
      they wouldn't allow all-electric instruments in an IFR-certified aircraft.
      -- 
      Jay Maynard, K5ZC, PP-ASEL, AGI      http://www.conmicro.com
      http://jmaynard.livejournal.com       http://www.tronguy.net
      Fairmont, MN (KFRM)                        (Yes, that's me!)
      AMD Zodiac CH601XLi N55ZC http://www.tronguy.net/N55ZC.shtml
      
      
Message 3
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: RE: Re: IFR Qualifications | 
      
      If you look at the panel of certified aircraft with "glass" panels, from Boeing
      down to Cirrus, they have "steam gauge" artificial horizon, airspeed and altimeter
      as backups. Maybe not technically required under the FARs, but there.
      
      Jim
      
      --- On Wed, 2/11/09, MaxNr@aol.com <MaxNr@aol.com> wrote:
      From: MaxNr@aol.com <MaxNr@aol.com>
      Subject: Zenith-List: RE: Re: IFR Qualifications
      
      I read the question as:"What is the minimum equipment?" The price tag for dual
      Dynon or MGL = how much? BTW, have you ever experienced a display going black
      like they sometime do in the multi million dollar aircraft with plenty of electrical
      power available? 
      
      
      Bob
      
      
      **************
      The year's hottest artists on the red carpet at the Grammy Awards.  AOL Music takes you there. (http://music.aol.com/grammys?ncid=emlcntusmusi00000002)
      
      
Message 4
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: RE: Re: IFR Qualifications | 
      
      
      on the new ones they dont if the efis has a backup battery.
      
      -----Original Message-----
      >From: Jimbo <jimandmandy@yahoo.com>
      >Sent: Feb 12, 2009 9:41 AM
      >To: zenith-list@matronics.com
      >Subject: Re: Zenith-List: RE: Re: IFR Qualifications
      >
      >If you look at the panel of certified aircraft with "glass" panels, from Boeing
      down to Cirrus, they have "steam gauge" artificial horizon, airspeed and altimeter
      as backups. Maybe not technically required under the FARs, but there.
      >
      >Jim
      >
      >--- On Wed, 2/11/09, MaxNr@aol.com <MaxNr@aol.com> wrote:
      >From: MaxNr@aol.com <MaxNr@aol.com>
      >Subject: Zenith-List: RE: Re: IFR Qualifications
      >To: Zenith-List@matronics.com
      >Date: Wednesday, February 11, 2009, 9:24 PM
      >
      >I read the question as:"What is the minimum equipment?" The price tag for dual
      Dynon or MGL = how much? BTW, have you ever experienced a display going black
      like they sometime do in the multi million dollar aircraft with plenty of electrical
      power available? 
      >
      >
      >Bob
      >
      >
      >**************
      >The year's hottest artists on the red carpet at the Grammy Awards.  AOL Music takes you there. (http://music.aol.com/grammys?ncid=emlcntusmusi00000002)
      >
      >
      
      
Message 5
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: RE: Re: IFR Qualifications | 
      
      
      Hi Jay,
      
      I'm going to ask you to trust me on this one.  I don't want to go 
      into details because they are too awful for this discussion 
      group.  There really are ways all your electrics can be absolutely 
      destroyed all at once.  If you insist, I will inform you off list of 
      how this can happen.
      
      Your point about vacuum pumps being more failure prone than electrics 
      is a good one but not at all related to this "Worst Case" 
      discussion.  The point here is that it is unlikely the vacuum pump 
      will fail under the same circumstances all the electrics fail 
      too.  The vacuum pump can fail every other flight, and still be the 
      only way to stay upright in case of a total electrical failure.
      
      The notion of having no electric equipment working in hard IFR is a 
      very scary one.  Without a non-electric gyro to stay upright it will 
      certainly be fatal.
      
      Paul
      XL getting close
      do not archive
      
      
      At 05:45 AM 2/12/2009, you wrote:
      
      >AMD uses all electric gyros...and their aircraft have all of the lightning
      >protection required by the current FAR part 23. There is no vacuum pump in
      >my airplane. Vacuum pumps fail much, much more often than aircraft get hit
      >by lightning. The FAA apparently doesn't consider it a serious risk, or else
      >they wouldn't allow all-electric instruments in an IFR-certified aircraft.
      
      
Message 6
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: RE: Re: IFR Qualifications | 
      
      
      The vacuum is between my ears. Besides if I get hit by lightening there will
      be no shortage of electricity.
      
      -- Craig
      
      Still do not archive
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-zenith-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-zenith-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Paul Mulwitz
      Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 5:20 AM
      Subject: RE: Zenith-List: RE: Re: IFR Qualifications
      
      
      Hi Craig,
      
      I'm afraid you still failed to cover all single 
      point failures on your "Dual" system.
      
      What if the plane gets hit by lightning and all 
      the electrics are wiped out?  For this event you 
      still need a VACUUM driven gyro.
      
      Paul
      XL getting close
      do not archive
      
      At 10:55 PM 2/11/2009, you wrote:
      
      >Of course I understand the downside of losing 
      >one EFIS. That's why my original response 
      >described dual units. For maximum reliability 
      >buy two different brands of EFIS - that 
      >insulates you from seeing the same bug on both displays.
      >
      >
      
      
Message 7
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: IFR Qualifications | 
      
      
      OK folks, there is IFR and there is IFR. I would never consider taking a 601 into
      what I would consider hard IFR.
      
      But with today's more complex airspace issues such as security TFR it isn't such
      a bad idea to file IFR if you are on a cross-country trip.  But to be able to
      file IFR you have to be able to legally file IFR. 
      
      What it comes down to is that not all  IFR flight needs super redundant back up.
      It is up to the pilot to set their personal minimums for the way their aircraft
      is outfitted and the WX and airspace they are flying in.
      
      And as mentioned upthread the best peice of IFR backup in a 601 or a Citation is
      probably a Garmin 496 or a 696. Kill all the other instruments in the plane
      with a hammer and it is capable of getting you to safety.
      
      --------
      W.R. "Gig" Giacona
      601XL Under Construction
      See my progress at www.peoamerica.net/N601WR
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=229980#229980
      
      
Message 8
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: RE: Re: IFR Qualifications | 
      
      
      Is there a redundant electrical supply for the electric gyros on the AMD
      XLs?
      
      -- Craig
      
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-zenith-list-server@matronics.com
      [mailto:owner-zenith-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jay Maynard
      Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 6:45 AM
      Subject: Re: Zenith-List: RE: Re: IFR Qualifications
      
      
      On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 04:19:53AM -0800, Paul Mulwitz wrote:
      > What if the plane gets hit by lightning and all the electrics are wiped 
      > out?  For this event you still need a VACUUM driven gyro.
      
      AMD uses all electric gyros...and their aircraft have all of the lightning
      protection required by the current FAR part 23. There is no vacuum pump in
      my airplane. Vacuum pumps fail much, much more often than aircraft get hit
      by lightning. The FAA apparently doesn't consider it a serious risk, or else
      they wouldn't allow all-electric instruments in an IFR-certified aircraft.
      -- 
      Jay Maynard, K5ZC, PP-ASEL, AGI      http://www.conmicro.com
      http://jmaynard.livejournal.com       http://www.tronguy.net
      Fairmont, MN (KFRM)                        (Yes, that's me!)
      AMD Zodiac CH601XLi N55ZC http://www.tronguy.net/N55ZC.shtml
      
      
Message 9
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: RE: Re: IFR Qualifications | 
      
      
      On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 10:16:57AM -0700, Craig Payne wrote:
      > Is there a redundant electrical supply for the electric gyros on the AMD
      > XLs?
      
      Yes. There's a second battery, charged through a diode off the alternator,
      and manually activated. In the event of total electrical failure, you switch
      off the master and switch on the alternate battery. It powers the gyros,
      only, for about two hours. It's not connected to the avionics or,
      unfortunately, the Dynon, but it'll keep you upright long enough to land.
      -- 
      Jay Maynard, K5ZC, PP-ASEL, AGI      http://www.conmicro.com
      http://jmaynard.livejournal.com       http://www.tronguy.net
      Fairmont, MN (KFRM)                        (Yes, that's me!)
      AMD Zodiac CH601XLi N55ZC http://www.tronguy.net/N55ZC.shtml
      
      
Message 10
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: RE: Re: IFR Qualifications | 
      
      Come on. Rich asked what was the minimum equipment to launch IFR into 
      clearing VFR conditions. It was my idea to also address the "doomsday" scenario
      to 
      get you down safely in deteriorating conditions. Yes, glass cockpits are 
      mandated to install backup analog instruments. The standby Attitude Display Indicator
      
      (ADI) in an installation that I am familiar with cost almost as much as a 
      Lexus. In a 2 1/4 inch instrument, you also have T&B, VOR/LOC with glide slope
      
      and more.
      If there is any chance of lightning, please keep the 601XLs on the ground.
      
      Bob 
      Plans #6-7791
      Do not archive
      
      
      **************
      The year's hottest artists on the red carpet at 
      the Grammy Awards.  AOL Music takes you there. 
      (http://music.aol.com/grammys?ncid=emlcntusmusi00000002)
      
Message 11
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Zodiac 650 HD? I Guess That's what I'll Call It | 
      
      
      Gentlemen,
      
      I am strongly considering a 650 canopy for my HD project.  In addition to the roll
      protection, I think that the 650 is a little easier to get in and out of bc
      the roll protection makes a nice place to grab on.
      
      I know that the fuselage is slightly narrower (maybe a few cm) from the XL/650
      to the HD and I KNOW that this will take some thinking and some small modifications,
      but I wanted to run this by a few folks to get your opinion and see if
      there are any issues I'm not anticipating that would not be able to be conquered.
      
      I come here for opinions since I know that there is no shortage of them here! :D
      
      
      So, what am I up against?  Many have fitted a tilt up xl canopy to the HD, so my
      assumption is that there must be SOME way to go from xl to 650 on an HD.
      
      --------
      One Rivet at a Time!
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=229996#229996
      
      
      Attachments: 
      
      http://forums.matronics.com//files/p1010214_164.jpg
      
      
Message 12
| 					INDEX |  Back to Main INDEX |  
| 				PREVIOUS |  Skip to PREVIOUS Message |  
| 					NEXT |  Skip to NEXT Message |  
| 	LIST |  Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |  
| 		SENDER |  Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |  
  | 
      
      
| Subject:  | Re: News from Magnificent Machine | 
      
      
      Brady,
      Thanks.  That's a great reply.  Lot's of good information for those considering
      the corvair.  Unrelated, could you post smaller pictures?  I guess that's why
      your post was stretched out a mile wide.  I had to scroll back and forth a lot
      to read it.
      Hope things are coming together.
      Dan
      do not archive
      
      --------
      Scratch building XL with Corvair Engine
      
      
      Read this topic online here:
      
      http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=230034#230034
      
      
 
Other Matronics Email List Services
 
 
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
 
 
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
  
 |