Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 08:07 AM - Fw: Re: Is Your CH601XL/650 a 1320 lb Airplane or a 1041 (Sabrina)
2. 09:06 AM - Fw: Re: Is Your CH601XL/650 a 1320 lb Airplane or a 1041 (Gig Giacona)
3. 01:51 PM - EFIS on 701 panel (Clive Richards)
4. 02:09 PM - Re: EFIS on 701 panel (Gig Giacona)
5. 02:36 PM - Re: EFIS on 701 panel (Ken Arnold)
6. 02:49 PM - Re: EFIS on 701 panel (Craig Payne)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Fwd: Re: Is Your CH601XL/650 a 1320 lb Airplane or a 1041 |
Terry,
Do your computer models show, with cables properly tensioned, that the left and
right aileron have an inherent dynamic dampening effect since one is heavier
than the other (trim tab motor) and one is up when the other is down?
Do your computer models show, with loose cables and flying too fast, that the heavy
left aileron starts a flutter that takes the left wing off first?
Could you run a simulation re: a small drag strip on the lower portion of the left
aileron (easily attached to the trim access panel plate or the plate itself
with a new lip) to see if that would aerodynamically balance the left aileron
in a low/no tension scenario as one approached flutter speed?
I think you know my final two questions: does your computer model show that aileron
trim should be deployed during a flutter onset scenario and if so, which
way?
Is there an aileron trim situation (up/down) that contributes to flutter?
Thanking you in advance,
Sabrina
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=235962#235962
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: Fwd: Re: Is Your CH601XL/650 a 1320 lb Airplane or a 1041 |
psm(at)att.net wrote:
> Actually, that is not even close to a true statement.
>
> The LSA definition calls for a maximum indicated (actually
> calibrated) airspeed of 138 mph at sea level and maximum continuous
> power.
Actually that isn't even what the definition calls for 138 mph at sea level in
level flight at maximum continuous power.
So let's say max power on a plane is 3200 rpm and at that speed I get 145 mph CAS
at sea level. If I, as the builder, say that max continuous power is 2800 and
that rpm gives me 138 mph at sea level, I'm LSA legal.
--------
W.R. "Gig" Giacona
601XL Under Construction
See my progress at www.peoamerica.net/N601WR
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=235975#235975
Message 3
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | EFIS on 701 panel |
Hi all
Considering a 701 panel layout it looks like an Enigma is
small enough to fit but a voyage would be to big.
Any one flying with an Enigma or other EFIS in a 701 if so are you
happy with its performance ?
Clive
do not archive
Message 4
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: EFIS on 701 panel |
Have you looked at the Dynon?
--------
W.R. "Gig" Giacona
601XL Under Construction
See my progress at www.peoamerica.net/N601WR
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=236016#236016
Message 5
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | Re: EFIS on 701 panel |
Clive,
I have Dynon D-100 that I'm very pleased with. Futures if desired,
include auto pilot from Dynon.
Ken
CH701 912ULS N701LK
do not archive
----- Original Message -----
From: Clive Richards
To: zenith-list@matronics.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 4:49 PM
Subject: Zenith-List: EFIS on 701 panel
Hi all
Considering a 701 panel layout it looks like an Enigma
is small enough to fit but a voyage would be to big.
Any one flying with an Enigma or other EFIS in a 701 if so are you
happy with its performance ?
Clive
do not archive
Message 6
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
| Subject: | EFIS on 701 panel |
I'm not flying yet but a Voyager fits in my 701 panel. Pictures attached. I
have seen a few 701s with Enigmas. I believe Gus Warren's Corvair-powered
701 is one of them. The attached pictures with the black panel are Gus's
701. I don't recall where I saw the other one, perhaps the Zenith site.
BTW: if you haven't already you might consider joining the MGL user-to-user
group on Yahoo and asking your question there. Among the 700+ members are
the head and chief designer of MGL (Rainier), his second in command (Nicol)
and most of the world-wide dealers:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stratomaster_users_group
-- Craig
From: owner-zenith-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-zenith-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Clive Richards
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 2:49 PM
Subject: Zenith-List: EFIS on 701 panel
Hi all
Considering a 701 panel layout it looks like an Enigma is
small enough to fit but a voyage would be to big.
Any one flying with an Enigma or other EFIS in a 701 if so are you happy
with its performance ?
Clive
do not archive
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|