Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 03:10 PM - Re: a tip (Carlos Sa)
2. 03:27 PM - Re: a tip (Steve Freeman (SDS))
3. 07:39 PM - Re: a tip ()
4. 08:54 PM - KLEMM Fuel Filter Gascolator (George Inman)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Thanks all for the comments
Having been around the Matronics lists for more than a few years, I'm fully
aware that I am not building a space shuttle.
So much so that I have returned the silica bricks (except a few that I kept
to repair the fireplace) and cancelled the solid fuel boosters order.
Seriously: what I described is quite simple and does not add to the
workload.
On the contrary, I strongly believe that it saves time by avoiding glitches
and associated head-scratching. I have used this process in the wings and
tail feathers (all done) and fuse (past "boat stage").
Happy building
Carlos
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 8:13 PM, Carlos Sa <carlossa52@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I have noticed - through other builders comments, but also through my own
>> experience - that using clecoes to keep parts together sometimes does not
>> quite work.
>> The parts do remain attached, not doubt, but they can be slightly shifted
>> from the original position when they were drilled.
>>
>> Here's why, in case you don't know:
>> The rivet whole is slightly larger than the rivet, and a cleco, having an
>> irregular shape, has plenty of room to move in a rivet hole.
>> For instance an A5 Avex rivet has a diameter between 0.140" and 0.155"
>> (the rivet has "fins", therefore the diameter varies).
>> A solid rivet diameter is 0.155"
>> The corresponding drill bit is 0.160".
>> A black cleco is 0.149" at its widest point - but it is not round.
>> (Note: these are measurements I took from Items I have. You may find
>> slightly different measurements.)
>>
>> In longer parts (more than a foot or two) or assemblies of more than two
>> parts, I find that if parts are not perfectly aligned, it's hard to insert
>> the rivets. And, worse, parts will be warped or difficult to match as I
>> proceed with construction.
>>
>> So, instead of simply trusting the clecoes, I started adding spent drill
>> bits here and there (a solid rivet is better than a cleco, but not as good
>> as a spent drill bit).
>>
>> I eventually started cutting drill bits and grinding one end to make it
>> easier to insert them.
>> (The grinding process consists of putting the drill bit in a drill or
>> drill press and grinding it with a dremel tool.).
>> The opposite end is covered with masking tape - see attached photo.
>>
>> I have a bunch of these, A4 and A5, and use them frequently.
>>
>> Hopefully this can be useful to someone.
>>
>> Blue skies
>>
>>
>>
>> Carlos
>> CH601-HD, plans
>> (CH650 firewall and canopy)
>> http://www.zenith.aero/profile/CarlosSa
>>
>
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
I don't know what you guys are building but I thought mine was a space
shuttle! If you look at page 6-MT-1 through 6-MT-12 these are the
plans for mounting your plane to a 747 to transport to and from your
home airport.
Steve Freeman
602-228-3830
From: owner-zenith-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-zenith-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Carlos Sa
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 3:10 PM
Subject: Re: Zenith-List: a tip
Thanks all for the comments
Having been around the Matronics lists for more than a few years, I'm
fully aware that I am not building a space shuttle.
So much so that I have returned the silica bricks (except a few that I
kept to repair the fireplace) and cancelled the solid fuel boosters
order.
Seriously: what I described is quite simple and does not add to the
workload.
On the contrary, I strongly believe that it saves time by avoiding
glitches and associated head-scratching. I have used this process in the
wings and tail feathers (all done) and fuse (past "boat stage").
Happy building
Carlos
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 8:13 PM, Carlos Sa <carlossa52@gmail.com>
wrote:
I have noticed - through other builders comments, but also
through my own experience - that using clecoes to keep parts together
sometimes does not quite work.
The parts do remain attached, not doubt, but they can be
slightly shifted from the original position when they were drilled.
Here's why, in case you don't know:
The rivet whole is slightly larger than the rivet, and a cleco,
having an irregular shape, has plenty of room to move in a rivet hole.
For instance an A5 Avex rivet has a diameter between 0.140" and
0.155" (the rivet has "fins", therefore the diameter varies).
A solid rivet diameter is 0.155"
The corresponding drill bit is 0.160".
A black cleco is 0.149" at its widest point - but it is not
round.
(Note: these are measurements I took from Items I have. You may
find slightly different measurements.)
In longer parts (more than a foot or two) or assemblies of more
than two parts, I find that if parts are not perfectly aligned, it's
hard to insert the rivets. And, worse, parts will be warped or difficult
to match as I proceed with construction.
So, instead of simply trusting the clecoes, I started adding
spent drill bits here and there (a solid rivet is better than a cleco,
but not as good as a spent drill bit).
I eventually started cutting drill bits and grinding one end to
make it easier to insert them.
(The grinding process consists of putting the drill bit in a
drill or drill press and grinding it with a dremel tool.).
The opposite end is covered with masking tape - see attached
photo.
I have a bunch of these, A4 and A5, and use them frequently.
Hopefully this can be useful to someone.
Blue skies
Carlos
CH601-HD, plans
(CH650 firewall and canopy)
http://www.zenith.aero/profile/CarlosSa
Message 3
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Carlos:
Don=99t let anyone discourage you from trying to achieve
perfection when building anything.
When you are finished you don=99t have to explain any misfits,
wrinkles or misalignments.
Russell Johnson
601-HDS (with misfits, wrinkles & misalignments)
From: Carlos Sa
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 5:09 PM
Subject: Re: Zenith-List: a tip
Thanks all for the comments
Having been around the Matronics lists for more than a few years, I'm
fully aware that I am not building a space shuttle.
So much so that I have returned the silica bricks (except a few that I
kept to repair the fireplace) and cancelled the solid fuel boosters
order.
Seriously: what I described is quite simple and does not add to the
workload.
On the contrary, I strongly believe that it saves time by avoiding
glitches and associated head-scratching. I have used this process in the
wings and tail feathers (all done) and fuse (past "boat stage").
Happy building
Carlos
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 8:13 PM, Carlos Sa <carlossa52@gmail.com>
wrote:
I have noticed - through other builders comments, but also through
my own experience - that using clecoes to keep parts together sometimes
does not quite work.
The parts do remain attached, not doubt, but they can be slightly
shifted from the original position when they were drilled.
Here's why, in case you don't know:
The rivet whole is slightly larger than the rivet, and a cleco,
having an irregular shape, has plenty of room to move in a rivet hole.
For instance an A5 Avex rivet has a diameter between 0.140" and
0.155" (the rivet has "fins", therefore the diameter varies).
A solid rivet diameter is 0.155"
The corresponding drill bit is 0.160".
A black cleco is 0.149" at its widest point - but it is not round.
(Note: these are measurements I took from Items I have. You may find
slightly different measurements.)
In longer parts (more than a foot or two) or assemblies of more than
two parts, I find that if parts are not perfectly aligned, it's hard to
insert the rivets. And, worse, parts will be warped or difficult to
match as I proceed with construction.
So, instead of simply trusting the clecoes, I started adding spent
drill bits here and there (a solid rivet is better than a cleco, but not
as good as a spent drill bit).
I eventually started cutting drill bits and grinding one end to make
it easier to insert them.
(The grinding process consists of putting the drill bit in a drill
or drill press and grinding it with a dremel tool.).
The opposite end is covered with masking tape - see attached photo.
I have a bunch of these, A4 and A5, and use them frequently.
Hopefully this can be useful to someone.
Blue skies
Carlos
CH601-HD, plans
(CH650 firewall and canopy)
http://www.zenith.aero/profile/CarlosSa
Message 4
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | KLEMM Fuel Filter Gascolator |
My plane has a "KLEMM chicago" Fuel Filter /
Gascolator
I cannot find info for it on Internet.
I need to know where to bur a new filter for it.
--
George H. Inman
ghinman@mts.net
204 287 8334
204 799 7062
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|