Zenith601-List Digest Archive

Sat 12/20/08


Total Messages Posted: 8



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 05:16 AM - 601 problems (Russell Bell)
     2. 05:43 AM - Re: ANGRY IN ENGLAND (Tim Juhl)
     3. 11:31 AM - Re: 601 problems (Bryan Martin)
     4. 11:34 AM - Re: 601 problems (aerobat)
     5. 11:50 AM - Re: Re: 601 problems (jaybannist@cs.com)
     6. 01:01 PM - Re: 601 problems (aerobat)
     7. 01:26 PM - Re: Re: 601 problems (Herb Heaton)
     8. 02:13 PM - Re: 601 problems (aerobat)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:16:44 AM PST US
    From: "Russell Bell" <rbe21716@bigpond.net.au>
    Subject: 601 problems
    Well Hi all I wish every one a merry Christmas I would like to make a few observations 1/ OK lack of communication that's a problem ??? Chris and the boys need to let us know more 2/ if there isn't any problems come out and tell the customers that have spent there savings on there kits and that would be the end of the story for me 3/ if there is a problem tell us so we can fix it when its all said and done I want is to be able to put one of my children in the seat next to me and feel safe doing so 4/ so at the end of the day all I want is a yes or no either way I will be able to fix the problems and be happy doing so


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:43:47 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: ANGRY IN ENGLAND
    From: "Tim Juhl" <juhl@avci.net>
    Sabrina, you never cease to amaze me with your insights. I never thought of steps as bracing the fuselage, but how can they not? I believe that several builders have opted not to install the steps for one reason or another. To our friend Gary in England, if you read the archives on this and the Zenith site you will see that the subject has been covered again and again and indeed sometimes emotions have gotten a bit out of hand. While XL's are not grounded in the US, there is still concern and everyone involved with the design is anxiously awaiting final word on what more, if anything, needs to be done. For all our sakes I hope things are resolved soon. In the meantime have a happy xmas and a great new year! Tim -------- ______________ CFII Champ L16A flying Zodiac XL - Jabiru 3300A Working on fuselage Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=220271#220271


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:31:17 AM PST US
    From: Bryan Martin <bryanmmartin@comcast.net>
    Subject: Re: 601 problems
    First of all, this list is not an official outlet for news and information from Zenith Aircraft, so any information you get from Zenith on this list will probably be second hand. The official outlets for information from Zenith are the newsletter and the Zenith website. Through these official channels, some information has been reported about these accidents. Zenith is actively participating with the NTSB and FAA in the investigation of these accidents. Unfortunately, since two of these accidents are still under investigation here in the U. S., the information that can be released is limited. One thing that has been stated is that no common link has been found in these accidents that would point to a design flaw. They have also stated that flutter is suspected in some of the accidents. A big problem with determining the cause of these accidents is that there are many different ways an airplane structure can be made to fail and it's not easy to figure out what exactly happened when all you have to go on is a pile of wreckage. You have to sort out the damage that happened on impact from the damage that happened before impact. Most of the accidents occurred with the airplane loaded near or above gross weight with two people aboard, two accidents occurred with one person aboard. As I recall, two of the accidents that happened in Europe (Spain and France) were linked to structural overload due to pilot error in the official accident investigations. The pilots apparently pulled up hard from shallow dives. This is not from first hand knowledge on my part so it could be in error. The accident in England that was apparently cited in the Dutch grounding was not a 601XL, it was a 601UL. It was also reported as structural overload due to pilot error. The pilot reportedly made a hard pull up to avoid power lines after making a high speed pass. The Canadian, Texas accident occurred after a sport pilot took off into a low ceiling with heavy rain and lightning in the vicinity. It was also linked to pilot error in the NTSB report. The National Transportation Safety Board determines the probable cause(s) of this accident as follows: "The pilot's improper pre-flight planning and decision to depart into deteriorating weather conditions, which resulted in a loss of control and subsequent in-flight break up." NTSB Identification: DFW07LA102, Aircraft: Walker Zenith Zodiac 601 XL, registration: N10028 So about half of the reported accidents have been somehow linked to pilot error. The Oakdale, California accident occurred on the first flight by the new owner after buying the airplane from the original builder. It was also the first flight after a major modification was made to the airplane. A co-pilot brake system was installed requiring removal and reinstallation of the control sticks and rudder bars. A post crash fire destroyed much of the wreckage and no definite cause was found for the crash. If you can believe the eye witness reports though, flutter is a good possibility here. NTSB Identification: LAX07FA026, Aircraft: Hooker Zodiac 601XL, registration: N105RH The NTSB report of the Yuba City accident contains a great deal of information. This accident appears to be very different from most of the others in that the airplane broke up into several major pieces in the air which then impacted separately over a large area on the ground. Based on the description of the wreckage, it appears that the airplane failed from a negative G overload. The reported radar tracking seems to confirm this. Within a half minute or so the plane went from level flight to a 700 ft/min climb to 2000 ft/min descent. This accident is still under investigation. NTSB Identification: LAX07FA026, Aircraft: Aircraft Mfg & Dev. Co. (AMD) CH601XL SLSA, registration: N158MD. The Polk City accident aircraft had one person aboard but may have been heavily loaded because he was on a long cross country trip to the Sun'N'Fun air show, the report doesn't mention weight and balance data. It's still under investigation. NTSB Identification: NYC08FA158, Aircraft: Chech Aircraft Works SPOL SRO CH 601 XL RTF, registration: N357DT. In my opinion, most of the accidents have been strongly linked to abrupt maneuvers or loss of control. As far as I can tell, only the Polk City, Oakdale and Netherlands accidents haven't yet been strongly linked to a possible reason for failure. On Dec 20, 2008, at 8:15 AM, Russell Bell wrote: > Well Hi all I wish every one a merry Christmas > > I would like to make a few observations > > 1/ > OK lack of communication that's a problem ??? > Chris and the boys need to let us know more > > 2/ > if there isn't any problems come out and tell the customers that > have spent there savings on there kits and that would be the end of > the story for me > > 3/ > if there is a problem tell us so we can fix it > when its all said and done I want is to be able to put one of my > children in the seat next to me and feel safe doing so > > 4/ > so at the end of the day all I want is a yes or no either way I > will be able to fix the problems and be happy doing so > > -- Bryan Martin N61BM, CH 601 XL, RAM Subaru, Stratus redrive. do not archive.


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:34:32 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: 601 problems
    From: "aerobat" <rhood2000@hotmail.com>
    I think that deep down, as much as we love our XLs we all know there is a problem. Wings should not fall off aeroplanes, there must be many other types out there with incorrect cable tensions flying without dropping out of the sky. Rumour has it that the UK LAA have voiced their concern to the designer who appears to deny any problem. Unfortunately if something is not done history points to another XL wing failing in flight. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=220324#220324


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:50:02 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: 601 problems
    From: jaybannist@cs.com
    aerobat (whoever you are), Where do you get this "we" stuff?? "We" don't all know there is a problem with the XL.? Maybe there is a problem with some of the XL pilots, but "we" are not all in agreement with you. And please rumor out of any serious discussion of the XL. Jay in Dallas Do not archive -----Original Message----- From: aerobat <rhood2000@hotmail.com> Sent: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 1:34 pm Subject: Zenith601-List: Re: 601 problems I think that deep down, as much as we love our XLs we all know there is a problem. Wings should not fall off aeroplanes, there must be many other types out there with incorrect cable tensions flying without dropping out of the sky. Rumour has it that the UK LAA have voiced their concern to the designer who appears to deny any problem. Unfortunately if something is not done history points to another XL wing failing in flight. ________________________________________________________________________ Email message sent from CompuServe - visit us today at http://www.cs.com


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:01:05 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: 601 problems
    From: "aerobat" <rhood2000@hotmail.com>
    Apologies if I've touched a raw nerve, you may have 100 percent confidence in your XL but a lot of owners that I've talked to do not. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=220331#220331


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:26:07 PM PST US
    From: "Herb Heaton" <Heatonhe36@msn.com>
    Subject: Re: 601 problems
    Mr. Aerobat, Are you, by any chance, familiar with the Bradley Aerobat? No insinuations...Just curious. Regards, Herb 601XL from plans ----- Original Message ----- From: aerobat<mailto:rhood2000@hotmail.com> To: zenith601-list@matronics.com<mailto:zenith601-list@matronics.com> Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2008 2:00 PM Subject: Zenith601-List: Re: 601 problems <rhood2000@hotmail.com<mailto:rhood2000@hotmail.com>> Apologies if I've touched a raw nerve, you may have 100 percent confidence in your XL but a lot of owners that I've talked to do not. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=220331#220331<http://forums .matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=220331#220331> http://www.matronics.com/contribution<http://www.matronics.com/contributi on> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith601-List<http://www.matronics.co m/Navigator?Zenith601-List>


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:13:12 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: 601 problems
    From: "aerobat" <rhood2000@hotmail.com>
    Sorry, no connection whatsoever. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=220338#220338




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   zenith601-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Zenith601-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/zenith601-list
  • Browse Zenith601-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/zenith601-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --