Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 01:55 PM - uk 601 xl aircraft cleared for flight (GBzodiflyer)
2. 02:11 PM - Re: uk 601 xl aircraft cleared for flight (Jim Belcher)
3. 02:13 PM - Re: uk 601 xl aircraft cleared for flight (LHusky@aol.com)
4. 02:29 PM - Re: uk 601 xl aircraft cleared for flight (countzero)
5. 02:40 PM - Re: uk 601 xl aircraft cleared for flight (Gig Giacona)
6. 02:48 PM - Re: uk 601 xl aircraft cleared for flight (Paul Mulwitz)
7. 02:53 PM - Re: uk 601 xl aircraft cleared for flight (jaybannist@cs.com)
8. 03:17 PM - Re: uk 601 xl aircraft cleared for flight (KARL POLIFKA)
9. 03:19 PM - Re: uk 601 xl aircraft cleared for flight (KARL POLIFKA)
10. 03:20 PM - Re: uk 601 xl aircraft cleared for flight (Jim Belcher)
11. 04:42 PM - Re: Re: uk 601 xl aircraft cleared for flight (Rick Lindstrom)
12. 08:07 PM - Re: Re: uk 601 xl aircraft cleared for flight (Ron Pollock)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | uk 601 xl aircraft cleared for flight |
601 XL AIRCRAFT ARE CLEARED FOR FLIGHT IN THE UK WITH THE FOLLOWING MODIFICATIONS
INCLUDED-
1, Aileron mass balance system.
2, Vertical stiffening of the carry through spar.
3, modified and less sensitive elevator trim modification.
4, Temporary max 0 fuel weight 494 kg until Canadian static load tests are known.
:D
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=259787#259787
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: uk 601 xl aircraft cleared for flight |
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 15:54, GBzodiflyer wrote:
>
> 601 XL AIRCRAFT ARE CLEARED FOR FLIGHT IN THE UK WITH THE FOLLOWING
> MODIFICATIONS INCLUDED- 1, Aileron mass balance system.
> 2, Vertical stiffening of the carry through spar.
> 3, modified and less sensitive elevator trim modification.
> 4, Temporary max 0 fuel weight 494 kg until Canadian static load tests are
> known.
On the one hand, I'm happy that there is a path that will unground 601XLs in
the UK.
On the other, I have the uncomfortable feeling that this may be a little like
trying to swat flying insects: it may not hit the actual problem(s), if any.
We still do not appear to have a firm definition of the actual problem(s).
=============================================
You can check on my aircraft construction
progress at: http://www.mykitlog.com/santaigo
================================================
Jim B. Belcher
BS, MS Physics, math, Computer Science
A&P/IA
Instrument Rated Pilot
General Radio Telephone Certificate
Retired Aerospace Technical Manager
================================================
Message 3
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: uk 601 xl aircraft cleared for flight |
Anybody got their hands on these modifications yet?
Larry Husky
Madras, Oregon
In a message dated 8/26/2009 1:56:37 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
thehighflyer@aol.com writes:
--> Zenith601-List message posted by: "GBzodiflyer" <thehighflyer@aol.com>
601 XL AIRCRAFT ARE CLEARED FOR FLIGHT IN THE UK WITH THE FOLLOWING
MODIFICATIONS INCLUDED-
1, Aileron mass balance system.
2, Vertical stiffening of the carry through spar.
3, modified and less sensitive elevator trim modification.
4, Temporary max 0 fuel weight 494 kg until Canadian static load tests are
known.
:D
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=259787#259787
Message 4
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: uk 601 xl aircraft cleared for flight |
That is great news. Will there be an XL flying to the Sywell Revival rally?
GBzodiflyer wrote:
> 601 XL AIRCRAFT ARE CLEARED FOR FLIGHT IN THE UK WITH THE FOLLOWING MODIFICATIONS
INCLUDED-
> 1, Aileron mass balance system.
> 2, Vertical stiffening of the carry through spar.
> 3, modified and less sensitive elevator trim modification.
> 4, Temporary max 0 fuel weight 494 kg until Canadian static load tests are known.
> :D
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=259800#259800
Message 5
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: uk 601 xl aircraft cleared for flight |
Ready, Fire, Aim.
--------
W.R. "Gig" Giacona
601XL Under Construction
See my progress at www.peoamerica.net/N601WR
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=259802#259802
Message 6
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: uk 601 xl aircraft cleared for flight |
Hi Jim,
While I believe you are correct, I am afraid this is as good as it
will get. The FAA apparently has decided there really is no problem
with the XL, so we can expect nothing more from them. Chris has
promised release of the design changes when the situation in Europe
reached a conclusion, so I guess we can now get the drawings.
I just wrote an email to Sebastian asking for the drawings. When I
get them, I will probably implement some or all of the changes on my
XL and proceed into flight test. My position since the NTSB letter
was released was that my plane would be grounded until their primary
complaints were resolved - aileron mass balance and a control
improvement to eliminate the response problem.
Paul
XL awaiting design changes
At 02:11 PM 8/26/2009, you wrote:
>On the one hand, I'm happy that there is a path that will unground 601XLs in
>the UK.
>
>On the other, I have the uncomfortable feeling that this may be a little like
>trying to swat flying insects: it may not hit the actual problem(s), if any.
>We still do not appear to have a firm definition of the actual problem(s).
Message 7
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: uk 601 xl aircraft cleared for flight |
This is like - A guy comes into the hospital with a sore leg, lacerations and
blurry vision.? Going only by what other people have told him was wrong, they
set and cast his broken leg, clean, suture and bandage his lacerations and remove
the cataracts and insert new lenses.? Only his leg wasn't broken, it was just
sprained.? His lacerations needed only band-aids.? He didn't have cataracts,
and simply needed corrective glasses. The guy goes home satisfied, but later
dies of undiagnosed cancer.? Is this analogous ?
Jay Bannister
Do not archive
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Belcher <z601a@anemicaardvark.com>
Sent: Wed, Aug 26, 2009 4:11 pm
Subject: Re: Zenith601-List: uk 601 xl aircraft cleared for flight
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 15:54, GBzodiflyer wrote:
>
> 601 XL AIRCRAFT ARE CLEARED FOR FLIGHT IN THE UK WITH THE FOLLOWING
> MODIFICATIONS INCLUDED- 1, Aileron mass balance system.
> 2, Vertical stiffening of the carry through spar.
> 3, modified and less sensitive elevator trim modification.
> 4, Temporary max 0 fuel weight 494 kg until Canadian static load tests are
> known.
On the one hand, I'm happy that there is a path that will unground 601XLs in
the UK.
On the other, I have the uncomfortable feeling that this may be a little like
trying to swat flying insects: it may not hit the actual problem(s), if any.
We still do not appear to have a firm definition of the actual problem(s).
Message 8
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: uk 601 xl aircraft cleared for flight |
Paul,
The control response "problem", given the posts I've seen, resides in the h
and on the stick. This is a kabuki dance.
Karl
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Mulwitz
To: zenith601-list@matronics.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 5:44 PM
Subject: Re: Zenith601-List: uk 601 xl aircraft cleared for flight
Hi Jim,
While I believe you are correct, I am afraid this is as good as it
will get. The FAA apparently has decided there really is no problem
with the XL, so we can expect nothing more from them. Chris has
promised release of the design changes when the situation in Europe
reached a conclusion, so I guess we can now get the drawings.
I just wrote an email to Sebastian asking for the drawings. When I
get them, I will probably implement some or all of the changes on my
XL and proceed into flight test. My position since the NTSB letter
was released was that my plane would be grounded until their primary
complaints were resolved - aileron mass balance and a control
improvement to eliminate the response problem.
Paul
XL awaiting design changes
At 02:11 PM 8/26/2009, you wrote:
>On the one hand, I'm happy that there is a path that will unground 601XL
s in
>the UK.
>
>On the other, I have the uncomfortable feeling that this may be a little
like
>trying to swat flying insects: it may not hit the actual problem(s), if
any.
>We still do not appear to have a firm definition of the actual problem(s
).
===========
===========
===========
===========
Message 9
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: uk 601 xl aircraft cleared for flight |
Agree
----- Original Message -----
From: jaybannist@cs.com
To: zenith601-list@matronics.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 5:53 PM
Subject: Re: Zenith601-List: uk 601 xl aircraft cleared for flight
This is like - A guy comes into the hospital with a sore leg, lacerations
and blurry vision. Going only by what other people have told him was wron
g, they set and cast his broken leg, clean, suture and bandage his lacerati
ons and remove the cataracts and insert new lenses. Only his leg wasn't br
oken, it was just sprained. His lacerations needed only band-aids. He did
n't have cataracts, and simply needed corrective glasses. The guy goes home
satisfied, but later dies of undiagnosed cancer. Is this analogous ?
Jay Bannister
Do not archive
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Belcher <z601a@anemicaardvark.com>
To: zenith601-list@matronics.com
Sent: Wed, Aug 26, 2009 4:11 pm
Subject: Re: Zenith601-List: uk 601 xl aircraft cleared for flight
>
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 15:54, GBzodiflyer wrote:
>
>
> 601 XL AIRCRAFT ARE CLEARED FOR FLIGHT IN THE UK WITH THE FOLLOWING
> MODIFICATIONS INCLUDED- 1, Aileron mass balance system.
> 2, Vertical stiffening of the carry through spar.
> 3, modified and less sensitive elevator trim modification.
> 4, Temporary max 0 fuel weight 494 kg until Canadian static load tests ar
e
> known.
On the one hand, I'm happy that there is a path that will unground 601XLs i
n
the UK.
On the other, I have the uncomfortable feeling that this may be a little li
ke
trying to swat flying insects: it may not hit the actual problem(s), if any
We still do not appear to have a firm definition of the actual problem(s).
Message 10
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: uk 601 xl aircraft cleared for flight |
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 16:53, jaybannist@cs.com wrote:
> This is like - A guy comes into the hospital with a sore leg, lacerations
> and blurry vision.? Going only by what other people have told him was
> wrong, they set and cast his broken leg, clean, suture and bandage his
> lacerations and remove the cataracts and insert new lenses.? Only his leg
> wasn't broken, it was just sprained.? His lacerations needed only
> band-aids.? He didn't have cataracts, and simply needed corrective glasses.
> The guy goes home satisfied, but later dies of undiagnosed cancer.? Is
> this analogous ?
...or possibly, by making to corrections to things which may not have been
wrong in the first place, one of the corrections causes new problems.
We really really need to do something to appease people, even if it is wrong.
--
============================================
Do not archive.
============================================
Jim B Belcher
BS, MS Physics, Math, Computer Science
A&P/IA
Retired aerospace technical manager
============================================
Message 11
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: uk 601 xl aircraft cleared for flight |
Exactly.
But, I think this is really the next best thing to finding out the airplane is
bulletproof, no matter what the pilot does to it in flight or in the hangar. (Not
in THIS lifetime!)
We in the US of A have the luxury of implementing some, none, or all of the recommended
"fixes" in our E-AB Zodies.
If the spar stiffening results in a G or two of extra margin, I'll consider that
one. Beyond that, who knows? My personal preference is not to monkey with the
control system, but just maintain cable tensions.
Well, they had to come up with SOMETHING, whether or not a real need was ever proven.
It could've been a lot worse.
Rick Lindstrom
N42KP
-----Original Message-----
>From: Gig Giacona <wrgiacona@gmail.com>
>Sent: Aug 26, 2009 5:40 PM
>To: zenith601-list@matronics.com
>Subject: Zenith601-List: Re: uk 601 xl aircraft cleared for flight
>
>
>Ready, Fire, Aim.
>
>--------
>W.R. "Gig" Giacona
>601XL Under Construction
>See my progress at www.peoamerica.net/N601WR
>
>
>Read this topic online here:
>
>http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=259802#259802
>
>
Message 12
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: uk 601 xl aircraft cleared for flight |
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|