Zenith640-List Digest Archive

Fri 04/15/11


Total Messages Posted: 6



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 02:14 AM - Re: A Newbie from Malaysia (stevetosh)
     2. 04:35 AM - Re: cabin space compaired to early Cherokee 140s (super58d)
     3. 04:44 AM - Re: A Newbie from Malaysia (super58d)
     4. 05:18 AM - Re: A Newbie from Malaysia (pilot4pay)
     5. 04:22 PM - Re: A Newbie from Malaysia (Scott Stewart)
     6. 07:58 PM - Re: cabin space compaired to early Cherokee 140s (mcjon77)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 02:14:01 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: A Newbie from Malaysia
    From: "stevetosh" <tosh_lincoln@yahoo.com>
    Hello Guys, Please which one is better about shear, i can found hydraulic which is expensive, and there is manual shear machine. So which one should i go for. But I found a shear plan on 601.org but dont really understand the plan. Any advice? Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=336977#336977


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:35:42 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: cabin space compaired to early Cherokee 140s
    From: "super58d" <smarkburrows@gmail.com>
    I am still on my wings, and haven't actually sat in the back of a 640, but from the one I scrutinized at AMD in Georgia it appears to have about the same dimensions as a Cherokee. I think it's easier to get in and out of than a Cherokee is though because you can get into both sides. I always thought you have to be a contortionist to get into the Cherokee because of only having a right door. -------- Mark s/n 094 My Build Site: http://www.mykitlog.com/stephen363/ Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=336986#336986


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:44:35 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: A Newbie from Malaysia
    From: "super58d" <smarkburrows@gmail.com>
    Scott and gang, I reviewed the errata again and found something of note. I bought those new CAD plans when they came out about a year ago and found something interesting. Here is the errata in question: "Drawing 640V1, Revision 4 - Item 1, Wing Spar Extension. The plans dimension "~405" to the first lightening hole. Change this to 350 mm. 640V2 wing spar extension assembly shows the lightening hole half-way between the two (L) pieces. Adding the dimensions: 25 mm for spar cap overlap + 225 mm from overlap bend to first (L) + 100 mm from first (L) to center of lightening hole = 350 mm." My old plans had the distance at 405 like you said Scott, but the new CAD plans have it as approx 305mm. Not the 350mm The errata page said it is supposed to be. Zenair obviously fixed the mistake (but left the revision number the same) but now we need to figure out if the 305mm or the 350mm is correct. Both pictures of 640-V-2 show the lightening hole slightly closer to the inboard "L" angle than the outer one. There is nothing out there really so I doubt 45mm difference will matter at all though. Scott, I didn't want to update the errata page until we got a resolution on which number is correct. -------- Mark s/n 094 My Build Site: http://www.mykitlog.com/stephen363/ Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=336987#336987


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:18:25 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: A Newbie from Malaysia
    From: "pilot4pay" <pilot4profit@sbcglobal.net>
    stevetosh wrote: > Hello Guys, > > Please which one is better about shear, i can found hydraulic which is expensive, and there is manual shear machine. So which one should i go for. But I found a shear plan on 601.org but dont really understand the plan. Any advice? Unless you plan on making a commercial venture out of your kit building, a manual shear should be just fine. Many get by without a shear at all, but as a scratch builder, it probably would save you time. On thin stock, scoring with an Olfa knife works very well. -------- Craig Smith CH640 builder SN: 0078 &quot;Just think how stupid the average person is, and then realize that half of them are even stupider!&quot; --George Carlin Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=336990#336990


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:22:40 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: A Newbie from Malaysia
    From: "Scott Stewart" <scott_stewart@agilent.com>
    Hi Mark, I went out to the hangar where my wings are stored to measure and photograph the lightening hole. I used a crude measuring tape in the photograph just to demonstrate the distances. (And please forgive the dirt collected in the wing while in storage.) You can see the rivet line versus the position of the lightening hole. I suggest the 350mm dimension, but you can change this +/- 30 mm without affecting anything. Moving it 45 mm is too much. Notice how the hole would overlap the vertical "L" positioned at 250 mm from the edge of the wing spar extension. -------- Scott Stewart s/n: 0092 Building from plans Rudder and Stabilator complete. Wings at 85%. Fuselage at 80%. Construction slowed while I help a friend build his RV-9A. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=337071#337071 Attachments: http://forums.matronics.com//files/dsc00199a_141.jpg http://forums.matronics.com//files/dsc00198a_203.jpg


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:58:11 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: cabin space compaired to early Cherokee 140s
    From: "mcjon77" <mcjon77@yahoo.com>
    Thanks, Mark! The reason why I asked is that I always hear about how small the rear seats are, but they look pretty similar to the rear seat area of the older Cherokees. Good luck on your project! -------- Jon McDonald Building Sonex #1287 Next up CH 701 :D Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=337096#337096




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   zenith640-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Zenith640-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/zenith640-list
  • Browse Zenith640-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/zenith640-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --