Zenith701801-List Digest Archive

Fri 06/20/08


Total Messages Posted: 13



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 05:21 AM - Empty weight of 701 (Damien and Kathy)
     2. 07:10 AM - Re: How to avoid a smashed fuselage? (Coloradodan)
     3. 08:06 AM - Re: Empty weight of 701 (ricklach)
     4. 08:14 AM - Re: How to avoid a smashed fuselage? (n85ae)
     5. 08:21 AM - Re: How to avoid a smashed fuselage? (Coloradodan)
     6. 08:32 AM - Re: How to avoid a smashed fuselage? (n85ae)
     7. 09:29 AM - Re: Empty weight of 701 (sonar1@cox.net)
     8. 10:50 AM - Re: Re: How to avoid a smashed fuselage? (Gary Gower)
     9. 11:13 AM - 701 weight? (Zed Smith)
    10. 01:54 PM - Re: Empty weight of 701 (Damien and Kathy)
    11. 03:36 PM - Re: Left Turning Tendency in the Flare (Tommy Walker)
    12. 04:13 PM - Re: Re: Left Turning Tendency in the Flare (Dan)
    13. 05:17 PM - Re: Zenith701801-List Digest: 2 Msgs - 06/19/08 (Phil Owens)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:21:15 AM PST US
    From: "Damien and Kathy" <dgraham7@twcny.rr.com>
    Subject: Empty weight of 701
    Group: I am looking at a completed 701 and it has an empty weight of 519 pounds. It is a 2006 model with the 80 HP Rotax and no paint. The Zenith company website gives an empty weight of 580, but they don't seem to specify for which engine. Does the 519 pounds empty weight sound right ? Thanks.


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:10:51 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: How to avoid a smashed fuselage?
    From: "Coloradodan" <dfanning1@gmail.com>
    The hard landing was crushed up the starboard side from the bottom frame into the side reinforcement. The ditch incident had only bent the bottom frame on the port side just behind the main gear. I guess I'm wondering about a more robust bottom frame for landing in the rough. -------- Don't go looking for happiness...we'll find you. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=188754#188754


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:06:01 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Empty weight of 701
    From: "ricklach" <rick@ravengear.us>
    Sounds very light to me. Most every 701 I've seen in over 570LB and if the builder likes goodies over 600LB is not unusual. Rick Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=188759#188759


    Message 4


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:14:48 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: How to avoid a smashed fuselage?
    From: "n85ae" <n85ae@yahoo.com>
    Any photo's? When you say side reinforcement, are you referring to the channels that go between the rear wing attach brackets, and the gear attach? Jeff Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=188762#188762


    Message 5


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:21:57 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: How to avoid a smashed fuselage?
    From: "Coloradodan" <dfanning1@gmail.com>
    Unfortunately both aircraft were already repaired. The one repair was up the entire side the other was just a small patch on the bottom. The descriptions were given to me by the owners. I hope the list would provide some feed back if this was common? -------- Don't go looking for happiness...we'll find you. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=188763#188763


    Message 6


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 08:32:43 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: How to avoid a smashed fuselage?
    From: "n85ae" <n85ae@yahoo.com>
    I don't think there's a huge number of 801's out there to really know. I just walked out to the shop and looked at mine, as I am getting ready to join the front/rear sections. It is fairly stout in the area of the gear attach, and the forward sides are .032. The one place I could see being a weak area is those side channels. It would not be too difficult to make a 4130 steel subassembly that connected for example the Rear wing attach to the gear attach fittings. better piloting would also take of the problem as well. :) By the way I'm from Wondervu Colo off Hwy 72, Mom lives in Longmont. Currently I'm in the Chicago area. Jeff Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=188766#188766


    Message 7


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:29:02 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: Empty weight of 701
    From: "sonar1@cox.net" <sonar1@cox.net>
    Mine was 583 pounds with 80 hp rotax and very few changes to the plans, but with the seats in. 519 sounds too light. Is it a misprint? perhaps 619?? do no archive Fred Sanford N9701 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=188775#188775


    Message 8


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 10:50:15 AM PST US
    From: Gary Gower <ggower_99@yahoo.com>
    Subject: Re: How to avoid a smashed fuselage?
    I think, something has to give up.--this bending will lower the inertia of a hard-landing instread of the pilot or passengers bones...- - -Remember the cars from the '50s- (DeSoto, Plymouth, Studebaker, etc.)? --This-cars-were -dificult to crush (compared to new ones), will hardly bend- when a new-ones is almost total lost,-but how about the driver and passengers. - Nothing can-be better than practice the landings...-- - Hope some of the old timers in the list can-remeber about a pilot that us ed to land very often-his 701 in areas with lots of rocks near the sea sh ore.- - This pilot added a cable from the landing gear (bolts of the axle)- to th e lower support in the engine mount, where the floats bolt on.- This was intneded to lower the handle force from the landing gear over the gear supp ort in the fuselage in vry bumpy strips. - We had made a couple of "bouncy" landings with no harm to the airplane.- To bend something- has to be very violent...-- - Saludos Gary Gower 701 912S- 197 hrs and counting. --- On Fri, 6/20/08, Coloradodan <dfanning1@gmail.com> wrote: From: Coloradodan <dfanning1@gmail.com> Subject: Zenith701801-List: Re: How to avoid a smashed fuselage? <dfanning1@gmail.com> Unfortunately both aircraft were already repaired. The one repair was up the entire side the other was just a small patch on t he bottom. The descriptions were given to me by the owners. I hope the list would provide some feed back if this was common? -------- Don't go looking for happiness...we'll find you. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=188763#188763 ============0A=0A=0A


    Message 9


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 11:13:11 AM PST US
    From: Zed Smith <zsmith3rd@earthlink.net>
    Subject: 701 weight?
    do not archive There is another possibility.....the scales themselves. The half-dozen or so weighings I have been associated with (I did the hard part...held the clipboard & pencil)used several types of scales. Bathroom scales are not the most accurate things on the planet. Once, a Cub got weighed four times on four different scales and we got four results. The difference was nearly 100 pounds, lightest to heaviest. Biggest problm is that these scales are not "linear"....they may be close at 50#, and again at 75#, but way out in left field thereafter. If a real "platform" (beam) scale can be located this would be the better approach. One fellow I know has three platforms, has several pieces of plate steel for calibrators, and also has several empty 5-gallon plastic buckets that can be filled with gravel. There is enough room on one of these feed store platform scales to stack several buckets of gravel. The process is to start with one KNOWN 50-pound weight; replace it with a bucket of gravel...removing or replacing pebbles until it weighs exactly as much as the known item. Several calibrated buckets, all on the scale at the same time, should indicate on the scale the sum of all the buckets placed there. This proves the scale from light to heavy loads. Not sure I'd want to do a Weight & Balance without being sure of the scales. You can usually get the U S Post Office to weigh an item and tell you, to the ounce, its weight. There are probably other places with accurate scales.....maybe your medical doctor. Any decent "beam" scale is probably much more accurate than spring scales. Rocket science! Hope this is helpful, Zed


    Message 10


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:54:20 PM PST US
    From: "Damien and Kathy" <dgraham7@twcny.rr.com>
    Subject: Re: Empty weight of 701
    Thanks for the replies about the empty weight. I will do more investigating about it. Regards, Damien Do Not Archive ----- Original Message ----- From: Damien and Kathy To: zenith701801-list@matronics.com Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 8:19 AM Subject: Zenith701801-List: Empty weight of 701 Group: I am looking at a completed 701 and it has an empty weight of 519 pounds. It is a 2006 model with the 80 HP Rotax and no paint. The Zenith company website gives an empty weight of 580, but they don't seem to specify for which engine. Does the 519 pounds empty weight sound right ? Thanks.


    Message 11


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 03:36:12 PM PST US
    Subject: Re: Left Turning Tendency in the Flare
    From: "Tommy Walker" <twalker@cableone.net>
    Builders, Here's a single short video of N8701 turning final and landing this morning at our country airport. I made this by holding my cheap Sony digital camera up and pointing it at the nose. This time, as you can see there was no left turning tendency. touchdown was about 45 mph at around 2500 rpm. No Flare! Just land. You can hear a chattering sound after touchdown. The nose wheel is out of balance. I am going to pull it off and take it to a motorcycle shop and get it balanced. The mpg file is 23 MB so it takes a few minutes to load. I don't know how to do streaming video. http://myweb.cableone.net/twalker/june08.mpg Happy Flying, Tommy Walker in Alabama N8701 -------- Tommy Walker Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=188827#188827


    Message 12


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 04:13:01 PM PST US
    From: Dan <dwilde@clearwire.net>
    Subject: Re: Left Turning Tendency in the Flare
    Tommy Walker wrote: > > Builders, > > Here's a single short video of N8701 turning final and landing this morning at our country airport. I made this by holding my cheap Sony digital camera up and pointing it at the nose. > > This time, as you can see there was no left turning tendency. touchdown was about 45 mph at around 2500 rpm. > > No Flare! Just land. > > You can hear a chattering sound after touchdown. The nose wheel is out of balance. I am going to pull it off and take it to a motorcycle shop and get it balanced. > > The mpg file is 23 MB so it takes a few minutes to load. I don't know how to do streaming video. > > http://myweb.cableone.net/twalker/june08.mpg > > Happy Flying, > > Tommy Walker in Alabama > N8701 > I noticed the left turn last weekend only when the nose was pointed up in a steeper flare. Dan Wilde


    Message 13


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:17:10 PM PST US
    From: "Phil Owens" <powens@tds.net>
    Subject: Re: Zenith701801-List Digest: 2 Msgs - 06/19/08




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   zenith701801-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Zenith701801-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/zenith701801-list
  • Browse Zenith701801-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/zenith701801-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --