Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 08:00 AM - HKS and 701 ? (frank goodnight)
2. 09:15 AM - Re: [Probable Spam] HKS and 701 ? (Larry McFarland)
3. 09:36 AM - Re: [Probable Spam] HKS and 701 ? (frank goodnight)
4. 11:50 AM - Re: HKS and 701 ? (Doug MacDonald)
5. 01:15 PM - Re: HKS and 701 ? (frank goodnight)
6. 05:36 PM - Re: HKS and 701 ? (Thomas Longo)
Message 1
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Hi All,=0AI'm new to this list. I now fly a kolb firestar2 with the HKS 700
e engine. Plan =0Ato purchase a 701 or a 750 kit =0A=0Ain the near future.
Will someone on this list help me with information so I can =0Amake the bes
t decision?=0A-If someone has-put a HKS engine on a 701-and it is a g
ood preformer and they =0Aare happy with it, that is=0Athe way I would pref
er to go, simply because I already have the engine ( read =0Aeconomics). Ho
wever if it=0Awould-be a poor preformer. I would bite the bullet and go w
ith the 750 even at a =0Acost of 15 to 20 k more.=0AI have heard that the n
ewer models of the 701 are quite a bit heaver than =0Athe-original 65hp m
od. also=0AI am a large person --6ft 250lb. Please put your heads togeather
and share the =0Aknowledge that will save=0Ame the-time,energy ,money an
d frustation that will be wasted if I-make the wrong =0Achoice. I will be
going to the factory in the next month or so and get a ride =0Ain-oth pl
anes ,but I think they both have 100 hp engines so don"t=0Aknow how much th
at-will help. They-say the-HKS is doable as the 701was designed =0Afo
r 50 to 100 hp,-but don"t encourage -discourage-or support it.=0AThanks
=0AFrank Goodnight--
Message 2
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Hi Frank,
You're a good sized person and I believe you'll see the 750 as a more ideal
aircraft. The HKS is probably a good fit for the 701, but considering
that light plane with a 250 lb. pilot will seem more than a bit
underpowered. The 750 is definitely a great aircraft with a 100 hp. Engine
and you'll think so too
after you've had the chance to sit in one.
Best regards,
Larry McFarland 601hds at www.macsmachine.com
From: owner-zenith701801-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-zenith701801-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of frank
goodnight
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 9:55 AM
Subject: [Probable Spam] Zenith701801-List: HKS and 701 ?
Hi All,
I'm new to this list. I now fly a kolb firestar2 with the HKS 700e engine.
Plan to purchase a 701 or a 750 kit
in the near future. Will someone on this list help me with information so I
can make the best decision?
If someone has put a HKS engine on a 701 and it is a good preformer and
they are happy with it, that is
the way I would prefer to go, simply because I already have the engine (
read economics). However if it
would be a poor preformer. I would bite the bullet and go with the 750 even
at a cost of 15 to 20 k more.
I have heard that the newer models of the 701 are quite a bit heaver than
the original 65hp mod. also
I am a large person --6ft 250lb. Please put your heads togeather and share
the knowledge that will save
me the time,energy ,money and frustation that will be wasted if I make the
wrong choice. I will be going to the factory in the next month or so and get
a ride in oth planes ,but I think they both have 100 hp engines so don"t
know how much that will help. They say the HKS is doable as the 701was
designed for 50 to 100 hp, but don"t encourage -discourage-or support it.
Thanks
Frank Goodnight
Message 3
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: HKS and 701 ? |
Hi=C2- LARRY,=0A=0AThanks for your thoughts.=0AFrank Goodnight=0AFayettvi
lle , AR=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A________________________________=0AFrom: Larry McFar
land <larry@macsmachine.com>=0ATo: zenith701801-list@matronics.com=0ASent:
Tue, January 4, 2011 11:12:37 AM=0ASubject: RE: [Probable Spam] Zenith70180
1-List: HKS and 701 ?=0A=0A=0AHi Frank,=0AYou=99re a good sized perso
n and I believe you=99ll see the 750 as a more ideal =0Aaircraft.=C2
- The HKS is probably a good fit for the 701, but considering=0Athat ligh
t plane with a 250 lb. pilot will seem more than a bit underpowered.=C2-
=0AThe 750 is definitely a great aircraft with a 100 hp. Engine and you
=99ll think so =0Atoo=0Aafter you=99ve had the chance to sit in on
e.=C2- =0A=C2-=0ABest regards,=0ALarry McFarland 601hds at www.macsmach
ine.com=0A=C2-=0AFrom:owner-zenith701801-list-server@matronics.com =0A[ma
ilto:owner-zenith701801-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of frank =0Ago
odnight=0ASent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 9:55 AM=0ATo: zenith701801-list@m
atronics.com=0ASubject: [Probable Spam] Zenith701801-List: HKS and 701 ?=0A
=C2-=0AHi All,=0AI'm new to this list. I now fly a kolb firestar2 with th
e HKS 700e engine. Plan =0Ato purchase a 701 or a 750 kit =0A=0Ain the near
future. Will someone on this list help me with information so I can =0Amak
e the best decision?=0A=C2-If someone has=C2-put a HKS engine on a 701
=C2-and it is a good preformer and they =0Aare happy with it, that is=0At
he way I would prefer to go, simply because I already have the engine ( rea
d =0Aeconomics). However if it=0Awould=C2-be a poor preformer. I would bi
te the bullet and go with the 750 even at a =0Acost of 15 to 20 k more.=0AI
have heard that the newer models of the 701 are quite a bit heaver than
=0Athe=C2-original 65hp mod. also=0AI am a large person --6ft 250lb. Plea
se put your heads togeather and share the =0Aknowledge that will save=0Ame
the=C2-time,energy ,money and frustation that will be wasted if I=C2-ma
ke the wrong =0Achoice. I will be going to the factory in the next month or
so and get a ride =0Ain=C2-oth planes ,but I think they both have 100 hp
engines so don"t=0Aknow how much that=C2-will help. They=C2-say the=C2
-HKS is doable as the 701was designed =0Afor 50 to 100 hp,=C2-but don"t
encourage -discourage-or support it.=0AThanks=0AFrank Goodnight=C2-=C2
-=0A =C2-=0A =C2-=0Ahttp://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith701801-L
ist=0Ahttp://forums.matronics.com=0Ahttp://www.matronics.com/contribution
===================== =0A
Message 4
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: HKS and 701 ? |
Frank, I have a 701 with a 912ul. While the 701 might work with a HKS, I th
ink you will find the 701 pretty tight. Given your dimensions, I think you'
ll find the 750 a much better fit.
Doug MacDonald
CH-701 C-GBQX
Northwestern Ontario, Canada
Phase one
Sent from my iPad
On 2011-01-04, at 9:55 AM, frank goodnight <frank.goodnight@att.net> wrote:
> Hi All,
> I'm new to this list. I now fly a kolb firestar2 with the HKS 700e engine.
Plan to purchase a 701 or a 750 kit
> in the near future. Will someone on this list help me with information so I
can make the best decision?
> If someone has put a HKS engine on a 701 and it is a good preformer and t
hey are happy with it, that is
> the way I would prefer to go, simply because I already have the engine ( r
ead economics). However if it
> would be a poor preformer. I would bite the bullet and go with the 750 eve
n at a cost of 15 to 20 k more.
> I have heard that the newer models of the 701 are quite a bit heaver than t
he original 65hp mod. also
> I am a large person --6ft 250lb. Please put your heads togeather and share
the knowledge that will save
> me the time,energy ,money and frustation that will be wasted if I make the
wrong choice. I will be going to the factory in the next month or so and ge
t a ride in oth planes ,but I think they both have 100 hp engines so don"t
> know how much that will help. They say the HKS is doable as the 701was des
igned for 50 to 100 hp, but don"t encourage -discourage-or support it.
> Thanks
> Frank Goodnight
>
>
==========================
=========
==========================
=========
==========================
=========
==========================
=========
>
Message 5
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: HKS and 701 ? |
Hi Doug,=0AThanks for your thoughts, Useful info.=0AFrank=0Ado not archive
=0A=0A=0A=0A________________________________=0AFrom: Doug MacDonald <dougsn
ash@yahoo.com>=0ATo: "zenith701801-list@matronics.com" <zenith701801-list@m
atronics.com>=0ASent: Tue, January 4, 2011 1:49:03 PM=0ASubject: Re: Zenith
701801-List: HKS and 701 ?=0A=0A=0AFrank, I have a 701 with a 912ul. -Whi
le the 701 might work with a HKS, I think =0Ayou will find the 701 pretty t
ight. -Given your dimensions, I think you'll find =0Athe 750 a much bette
r fit.=0A=0ADoug MacDonald=0ACH-701 C-GBQX=0ANorthwestern Ontario, Canada
=0APhase one-=0A=0ASent from my iPad=0A=0AOn 2011-01-04, at 9:55 AM, fran
k goodnight <frank.goodnight@att.net> wrote:=0A=0A=0AHi All,=0A>I'm new to
this list. I now fly a kolb firestar2 with the HKS 700e engine. Plan =0A>to
purchase a 701 or a 750 kit =0A>=0A>in the near future. Will someone on th
is list help me with information so I can =0A>make the best decision?=0A>
-If someone has-put a HKS engine on a 701-and it is a good preformer
and they =0A>are happy with it, that is=0A>the way I would prefer to go, si
mply because I already have the engine ( read =0A>economics). However if it
=0A>would-be a poor preformer. I would bite the bullet and go with the 75
0 even at a =0A>cost of 15 to 20 k more.=0A>I have heard that the newer mod
els of the 701 are quite a bit heaver than =0A>the-original 65hp mod. als
o=0A>I am a large person --6ft 250lb. Please put your heads togeather and s
hare the =0A>knowledge that will save=0A>me the-time,energy ,money and fr
ustation that will be wasted if I-make the wrong =0A>choice. I will be go
ing to the factory in the next month or so and get a ride =0A>in-oth plan
es ,but I think they both have 100 hp engines so don"t=0A>know how much tha
t-will help. They-say the-HKS is doable as the 701was designed =0A>fo
r 50 to 100 hp,-but don"t encourage -discourage-or support it.=0A>Thanks
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
3D=3D
Message 6
INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Subject: | Re: HKS and 701 ? |
On 1/4/2011 10:55 AM, frank goodnight wrote:
> Hi All,
> I'm new to this list. I now fly a kolb firestar2 with the HKS 700e
> engine. Plan to purchase a 701 or a 750 kit
> in the near future. Will someone on this list help me with information
> so I can make the best decision?
> If someone has put a HKS engine on a 701 and it is a good preformer
> and they are happy with it, that is
> the way I would prefer to go, simply because I already have the engine
> ( read economics). However if it
> would be a poor preformer. I would bite the bullet and go with the 750
> even at a cost of 15 to 20 k more.
> I have heard that the newer models of the 701 are quite a bit heaver
> than the original 65hp mod. also
> I am a large person --6ft 250lb. Please put your heads togeather and
> share the knowledge that will save
> me the time,energy ,money and frustation that will be wasted if I make
> the wrong choice. I will be going to the factory in the next month or
> so and get a ride in oth planes ,but I think they both have 100 hp
> engines so don"t
> know how much that will help. They say the HKS is doable as the 701was
> designed for 50 to 100 hp, but don"t encourage -discourage-or support it.
> Thanks
> Frank Goodnight
> *
>
>
> *
Hi Frank, I remember you from the Kolb list. I had an MK III with a 582
that I sold to Ellery and built the 701 with 912uls which I like very
well, I would go with the 750 in your case.
Tom
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|