Today's Message Index:
----------------------
1. 07:59 AM - 701 or 750? (Brett Hanley)
2. 08:16 AM - Re: 701 or 750? (frank goodnight)
Message 1
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
=0A-My first plane was a 701 with a Subaru EA-81.- Great little one pla
ce STOL.- If =0AI where to build another I would not put more than 65hp o
n it.- Remember it was =0Adesigned originally for a 45hp.- =0A=0A=0AIf
you are dead set on 100hp then there is no reason not to build a 750.- If
you =0Aare building from plans you are only talking about several hundred
dollars in =0Amaterial to make the change.- I am in the process of buildi
ng a 750 from plans.- =0AI will assure you that it is a LOT MORE airplane
.- =0A=0A=0AIn my not so humble opinion the 701 is a great fit if you nee
d to meet the =0AEuropean ultralight rules.- After exposure to both I wou
ld not consider building =0Aanything but a 750 if building under FAA rules.
- The 750 is optimized for sport =0Apilot rules.- It should weigh in at
under 800 pounds and with a 1320 gross =0Aweight you have plenty of utilit
y.- It can also be built in a heaver version =0Athat gives you a 1440 pou
nd gross as an experimental flown with a private pilot =0Alicense.- Do yo
urself a favor and go sit in them both.- You will find it is a no =0Abrai
ner.=0A=0ABrett=0AN7750H =0APlans built=0A30% done
Message 2
| INDEX | Back to Main INDEX |
| PREVIOUS | Skip to PREVIOUS Message |
| NEXT | Skip to NEXT Message |
| LIST | Reply to LIST Regarding this Message |
| SENDER | Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message |
|
Hi Brett.=0A=0AThanks for your reply. I do intend to get a ride in both bef
ore buying.=0AFrank=0A=0Ado not archive=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A_____________________
___________=0AFrom: Brett Hanley <bretttdc@yahoo.com>=0ATo: zenith701801-li
st@matronics.com=0ASent: Wed, January 5, 2011 9:55:59 AM=0ASubject: Zenith7
01801-List: 701 or 750?=0A=0A=0A=0A-My first plane was a 701 with a Subar
u EA-81.- Great little one place STOL.- If =0AI where to build another
I would not put more than 65hp on it.- Remember it was =0Adesigned origin
ally for a 45hp.- =0A=0A=0AIf you are dead set on 100hp then there is no
reason not to build a 750.- If you =0Aare building from plans you are onl
y talking about several hundred dollars in =0Amaterial to make the change.
- I am in the process of building a 750 from plans.- =0AI will assure y
ou that it is a LOT MORE airplane.- =0A=0A=0AIn my not so humble opinion
the 701 is a great fit if you need to meet the =0AEuropean ultralight rules
.- After exposure to both I would not consider building =0Aanything but a
750 if building under FAA rules.- The 750 is optimized for sport =0Apilo
t rules.- It should weigh in at under 800 pounds and with a 1320 gross
=0Aweight you have plenty of utility.- It can also be built in a heaver v
ersion =0Athat gives you a 1440 pound gross as an experimental flown with a
private pilot =0Alicense.- Do yourself a favor and go sit in them both.
- You will find it is a no =0Abrainer.=0A=0ABrett=0AN7750H =0APlans built
===================== =0A
Other Matronics Email List Services
These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.
-- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --
|