Zenith701801-List Digest Archive

Wed 12/26/12


Total Messages Posted: 3



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 09:44 AM - Re: new 701 pilot (sonar1@cox.net)
     2. 12:39 PM - Re: new 701 pilot (Tipton,Paul B)
     3. 01:03 PM - Re: Re: new 701 pilot (frank goodnight)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 09:44:37 AM PST US
    Subject: Re: new 701 pilot
    From: "sonar1@cox.net" <sonar1@cox.net>
    Hi Frank: Congrats on finishing. My patterns at my uncontrolled airport are very close-in. I use 60 mph on final no-flap and pull the power at the threshold. For short field, when I turn final, I slow to 50 so I can get the flaps down - any faster, and it is really hard - and pull off ALL the power. The approach is steep, but is controllable. Don't like ever getting behind the power curve, as some 701 drivers do. If I am going to overshoot the end of the runway, I have discovered that slowing does not steepen the glide angle - I have to dive and pick up speed, and then pull it back to 50. When to flare is obvious, and I have had very few miscalculations. Often will get radio calls about "wow - now that's a short field landing" Fred Sanford - flying since 2003 Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=390976#390976


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 12:39:10 PM PST US
    From: "Tipton,Paul B" <PTIPTON@sw.org>
    Subject: Re: new 701 pilot
    Congratulations on getting up in the air. The 701 is certainly much different than the Cessna's or anything else for that matter. My pattern is flown mostly at cruise speed (90-95 MPH). My p attern is flown pretty close to the runway. Opposite the end of the runway I reduce RPM (on the Rotax 912) to 3,000. I turn my base at a 45 to the e nd of the runway having reduced speed to 60. I will gradually reduce speed to 50 on short final and carry that to the runway. My RPM will remain abo ut 3,000. The less I fool with the throttle the more stabilized approach I make. I can land in 300-500' that way. I don't bother with the flaps. I don't need to land shorter than that. The more flaps are applied the less flair will happen and the more accurate you are going to have to be with h eight above the runway. With full flaps you can land and park it at the sa me time. It simply stops flying and drops in from whatever height you happ en to be. Ask me how I know that! Even without flaps, takeoffs are a 4-5 second deal. Flaps do nothing but s low you down and increase the time you remain in ground effect. The wing + slat works great all by itself. Fly away at 60 to get height quickly or 7 0 for passengers to feel more comfortable. It is a plane with a simple, well thought out design. It is fun to fly... happy flying! Paul Tipton 321PT 300 hours This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the named individual. If you are not the named individual you are strictly pro hibited from disseminating, distributing, or copying this e-mail. Please no tify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by m istake and delete this e-mail from your system. The sender expressly reserv es all privileges and confidentiality which might otherwise be waived as a result of an erroneous or misdirected transmission. E-mail transmission can not be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be interc epted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain vi ruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omi ssions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail t ransmission. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version . No employee or agent is authorized to conclude any binding agreement on b ehalf of Scott & White Healthcare or any affiliated entity with another par ty by email without express written confirmation by the CEO or the Vice Pre sident of Supply Chain Services. Scott & White Healthcare www.sw.org


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 01:03:46 PM PST US
    From: frank goodnight <frank.goodnight@att.net>
    Subject: Re: new 701 pilot
    There were too many responces to my questions for me to thank each person . So I would like to say thanks to everyone that took the time to send me information. The answers gave me a feel for what is the usual way to proceed with my phase 1. Much more confidence inspiring than guessing , like i was doing. Fly safe and fair winds . Frank Goodnight ________________________________ From: jf3sb <jf3sb@yahoo.com> Sent: Tue, December 25, 2012 7:58:41 PM Subject: Zenith701801-List: Re: new 701 pilot I've never flown anything but Cessna 152s and 172's until I started on my 701 Phase I so the transition has taken some time and is still very much ongoing. I've been using 55 KIAS on base and final with no flaps, mainly because there's usually other faster traffic in the Class D that I don't want to hold up. 45-50 works, but its not very polite for the Citation who's hot on my butt... I'm also gradually flying narrower patterns as I get more familiar with it. If I fly the standard "Cessna" pattern, (1/2 mile base and final) I end up having to drag it in with a lot of power. The higher airspeed over the numbers always makes it easier to grease it on and save the tires. On short and soft fields I expect my norm will be full flaps and 40 KIAS or so, but I haven't played with it enough yet to know. I definitely agree that its best to get comfortable with the flaps at altitude first as they really add a lot of drag, and it already can drop out on you even without flaps if you take too much power out too fast. Check out John Marzulli's videos on You-tube and Roger at Zenith has a good one on there too. I mounted a video camera in the cockpit kind of on the same order as John's and plugged the mic into the intercom. That really helped a lot during Phase I testing, especially if you only get a chance to fly every few weeks. Enjoy the ride. If you go into it with the same attitude as building, the flight testing is every bit as fun. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=390950#390950




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   zenith701801-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Zenith701801-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/zenith701801-list
  • Browse Zenith701801-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/zenith701801-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --