Zenith701801-List Digest Archive

Tue 01/22/13


Total Messages Posted: 3



Today's Message Index:
----------------------
 
     1. 05:50 AM - Re: fuel pump 701fuel pump 701fuel pump 701 (Joe Spencer)
     2. 06:32 AM - Re: 701 fuel pump (oldjagman@yahoo.com)
     3. 07:00 AM - Re: 701 fuel pump (oldjagman@yahoo.com)
 
 
 


Message 1


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 05:50:42 AM PST US
    From: "Joe Spencer" <jpspencer@cableone.net>
    Subject: Re: fuel pump 701fuel pump 701fuel pump 701
    Not using a backup electric fuel pump for takeoff when one is available...that is the decision of the PIC but also poor judgement that may bite you one day. I don't consider my 701 to reliably gravity feed even in level flight at cruise power due to the flow tests I've done. Much less at takeoff power and climb attitude. But it will be more likely to gravity feed than a low wing with a failed engine driven pump. No way I take off in mine without the electric pump operating. What's the upside?


    Message 2


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 06:32:40 AM PST US
    From: oldjagman@yahoo.com
    Subject: Re: 701 fuel pump
    As you say, a choice of the PIC. However, if I felt my aircraft, couldn't RELIABLY deliver the fuel required f or level flight, I'd be ripping into the fuel system wanting to know why.... . Things, I'd look at would be : blocked filters, Restricted fuel lines (dents, or kinks) the number of 90 degree bends, the "ID" of the fuel lines. I would remove / replace / re-do / change, anything suspect! I would ground the aircraft, until I was sure the fuel delivery was reliable , all by itself. Imagine the cost of having an electrical loss.... On takeoff, at say 75 - 100 feet, at a high angle of attack........ and no p ower... Call me a cheap worry wart... But I have put too much money, time, and energ y, into my life, and into the build, To even risk that scenario.... PLUS.... I don't want to be fodder for the Anti GA group.p Sent from my iPad On Jan 21, 2013, at 18:42, "Roger" <roger.tracy@hotmail.com> wrote: > I don't have a problem with it right now .. but my gf is shorter and it wa s a challenge for her in the other Sonex I had. Also .. since I'm 64 and not getting younger .. at some point I might not be so agile. > I'm thinking something similar to the one Vans sells for the RV-6A .. but I 'm not sure how long it is. > Just need it on the pilot side. > > RT > > --- In sonexplans@yahoogroups.com, "Carl Orton" wrote: > > > > The *only* reason I went with the tailwheel was because I couldn't get u p on the tri-gear wing. Well, unless I crawled up on my hands and knees, and that *definitely* wouldn't be cool. ;-) Wish I'd known someone came up with a step.... > > > > Robert: Walt's email was at the end of Dick's response. > > > > Carl > > > > --- In sonexplans@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Wilson" wrote: > > > > > > Walt ? Got a Last name or A/C number? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: sonexplans@yahoogroups.com [mailto:sonexplans@yahoogroups.com] O n Behalf Of Lester Heim > > > Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 10:58 AM > > > To: sonexplans@yahoogroups.com > > > Subject: Re: [sonexplans] Step? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would like to see that as well. > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > > > On Jan 21, 2013, at 1:14 PM, sonex569@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, contact Walt he has two on his trigear. Good guy but don't tell him I said so. > > > > > > > > Dick > > > > > > > > 569 > > > > > > > > jowalt2@ > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "Roger" roger.tracy@ > > > > > To: sonexplans@yahoogroups.com > > > > Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 12:58:14 PM > > > > Subject: [sonexplans] Step? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Has anyone put a step on the side of a Sonex? Shorter passengers hav e a hard time getting up on to the wing. > > > > > > > > RT > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > __._,_.___ > Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Sta rt a New Topic Messages in this topic (6) > RECENT ACTIVITY: New Members 2 > Visit Your Group > For the latest Sonex News and Information, visit http://www.sonexaircraft .com > > > Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest =A2 Unsubscribe =A2 Terms o f Use =A2 Send us Feedback > . > > __,_._,___


    Message 3


  • INDEX
  • Back to Main INDEX
  • PREVIOUS
  • Skip to PREVIOUS Message
  • NEXT
  • Skip to NEXT Message
  • LIST
  • Reply to LIST Regarding this Message
  • SENDER
  • Reply to SENDER Regarding this Message
    Time: 07:00:10 AM PST US
    From: oldjagman@yahoo.com
    Subject: Re: 701 fuel pump
    Sorry! The unnecessary email somehow got attached, to my prev note... Charlie Sent from my iPad On Jan 22, 2013, at 8:32, oldjagman@yahoo.com wrote: > As you say, a choice of the PIC. > > However, if I felt my aircraft, couldn't RELIABLY deliver the fuel require d for level flight, I'd be ripping into the fuel system wanting to know why. .... > > Things, I'd look at would be : > blocked filters, > Restricted fuel lines (dents, or kinks) > the number of 90 degree bends, > the "ID" of the fuel lines. > > I would remove / replace / re-do / change, anything suspect! > I would ground the aircraft, until I was sure the fuel delivery was reliab le, all by itself. > > Imagine the cost of having an electrical loss.... > On takeoff, at say 75 - 100 feet, at a high angle of attack........ and no power... > > Call me a cheap worry wart... But I have put too much money, time, and ene rgy, > into my life, and into the build, > To even risk that scenario.... > > PLUS.... I don't want to be fodder for the > Anti GA group.p > > Sent from my iPad > > > On Jan 21, 2013, at 18:42, "Roger" <roger.tracy@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> I don't have a problem with it right now .. but my gf is shorter and it w as a challenge for her in the other Sonex I had. Also .. since I'm 64 and no t getting younger .. at some point I might not be so agile. >> I'm thinking something similar to the one Vans sells for the RV-6A .. but I'm not sure how long it is. >> Just need it on the pilot side. >> >> RT >> >> --- In sonexplans@yahoogroups.com, "Carl Orton" wrote: >> > >> > The *only* reason I went with the tailwheel was because I couldn't get u p on the tri-gear wing. Well, unless I crawled up on my hands and knees, and that *definitely* wouldn't be cool. ;-) Wish I'd known someone came up wit h a step.... >> > >> > Robert: Walt's email was at the end of Dick's response. >> > >> > Carl >> > >> > --- In sonexplans@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Wilson" wrote: >> > > >> > > Walt ? Got a Last name or A/C number? >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > From: sonexplans@yahoogroups.com [mailto:sonexplans@yahoogroups.com] O n Behalf Of Lester Heim >> > > Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 10:58 AM >> > > To: sonexplans@yahoogroups.com >> > > Subject: Re: [sonexplans] Step? >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > I would like to see that as well. >> > > >> > > Sent from my iPhone >> > > >> > > On Jan 21, 2013, at 1:14 PM, sonex569@ wrote: >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Yes, contact Walt he has two on his trigear. Good guy but don't tel l him I said so. >> > > > >> > > > Dick >> > > > >> > > > 569 >> > > > >> > > > jowalt2@ >> > > > >> > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> > > > From: "Roger" roger.tracy@ > >> > > > To: sonexplans@yahoogroups.com >> > > > Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 12:58:14 PM >> > > > Subject: [sonexplans] Step? >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Has anyone put a step on the side of a Sonex? Shorter passengers ha ve a hard time getting up on to the wing. >> > > > >> > > > RT >> > > > >> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >> > > >> > >> >> __._,_.___ >> Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Sta rt a New Topic Messages in this topic (6) >> RECENT ACTIVITY: New Members 2 >> Visit Your Group >> For the latest Sonex News and Information, visit http://www.sonexaircraf t.com >> >> >> Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest =A2 Unsubscribe =A2 Terms o f Use =A2 Send us Feedback >> . >> >> __,_._,___




    Other Matronics Email List Services

  • Post A New Message
  •   zenith701801-list@matronics.com
  • UN/SUBSCRIBE
  •   http://www.matronics.com/subscription
  • List FAQ
  •   http://www.matronics.com/FAQ/Zenith701801-List.htm
  • Web Forum Interface To Lists
  •   http://forums.matronics.com
  • Matronics List Wiki
  •   http://wiki.matronics.com
  • 7-Day List Browse
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse/zenith701801-list
  • Browse Zenith701801-List Digests
  •   http://www.matronics.com/digest/zenith701801-list
  • Browse Other Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/browse
  • Live Online Chat!
  •   http://www.matronics.com/chat
  • Archive Downloading
  •   http://www.matronics.com/archives
  • Photo Share
  •   http://www.matronics.com/photoshare
  • Other Email Lists
  •   http://www.matronics.com/emaillists
  • Contributions
  •   http://www.matronics.com/contribution

    These Email List Services are sponsored solely by Matronics and through the generous Contributions of its members.

    -- Please support this service by making your Contribution today! --